error: Consider using an AtomicBool instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
--> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:9:5
|
9 | Mutex::new(true);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D mutex-atomic` implied by `-D warnings`
error: Consider using an AtomicUsize instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
--> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:10:5
|
10 | Mutex::new(5usize);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: Consider using an AtomicIsize instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
--> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:11:5
|
11 | Mutex::new(9isize);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: Consider using an AtomicPtr instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
--> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:13:5
|
13 | Mutex::new(&x as *const u32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: Consider using an AtomicPtr instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
--> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:14:5
|
14 | Mutex::new(&mut x as *mut u32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: Consider using an AtomicUsize instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
--> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:15:5
|
15 | Mutex::new(0u32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D mutex-integer` implied by `-D warnings`
error: Consider using an AtomicIsize instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
--> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:16:5
|
16 | Mutex::new(0i32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 7 previous errors