What is splintr?
Splintr loads a tokenizer from three sources and dispatches it to four backends, all behind a single AnyTokenizer type — the calling code never changes with the vocabulary:
| Source | What it is | Backends it can produce |
|---|---|---|
Bundled (from_pretrained) |
8 vocabularies compiled in: OpenAI, Llama 3, DeepSeek, Mistral, Whisper | byte-level BPE, SPM-BPE |
tokenizer.json (from_json) |
Any HuggingFace file — normalizers, pre-tokenizers, decoders and all | byte-level BPE, Unigram, WordPiece |
GGUF vocab (from_gguf_vocab) |
The tokenizer.ggml.* keys, filled by your runtime's GGUF parser |
byte-level BPE, SPM-BPE, Unigram, WordPiece |
Correctness is established differentially, not by unit tests alone: every family is fuzzed id-for-id against its reference implementation using strings built from each vocabulary's own added and special tokens — the shape prose corpora never reach, and where the bugs actually live. See differential testing.
Why it exists
Tokenization sits on the hot path of every LLM application — prompts, training corpora, RAG chunks, token counting for billing. Python-based tokenizers cannot use the cores you paid for, so batch preprocessing turns into wall-clock you wait through.
The usual escape is one fast library per format: tiktoken for OpenAI, sentencepiece for Mistral and T5, tokenizers for everything else — three dependencies, three APIs, three sets of edge cases, and no answer at all for a GGUF vocabulary. Splintr's answer is one handle over every format, at Rust speed, with the reference implementations as the correctness oracle.

| Configuration | Splintr | Tiktoken | HuggingFace | TokenDagger | vs tiktoken |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 texts | 56.4 MB/s | 5.8 MB/s | 14.7 MB/s | 4.7 MB/s | 9.8x |
| 500 texts | 65.1 MB/s | 5.5 MB/s | 14.8 MB/s | 5.4 MB/s | 11.9x |
| 100 texts | 50.3 MB/s | 4.0 MB/s | 11.3 MB/s | 3.8 MB/s | 12.7x |
10-12x faster than tiktoken. 4x faster than HuggingFace. Built in Rust, accessible from Python.
Produced by benchmarks/benchmark_batch.py on the machine described under Performance Deep Dive. The absolute MB/s move with the hardware and with the versions of the libraries being compared against; the ratio is the durable part. Re-run the script to get the figures for your own machine. The chart above is from an earlier run on different hardware — the table is the measured one.
Quick Start
Python
# Load a pretrained vocabulary
= # OpenAI GPT-4/3.5
# tokenizer = Tokenizer.from_pretrained("llama3") # Meta Llama 3 family
# tokenizer = Tokenizer.from_pretrained("deepseek_v3") # DeepSeek V3/R1
# tokenizer = Tokenizer.from_pretrained("mistral_v1") # Mistral 7B v0.1/v0.2
# tokenizer = Tokenizer.from_pretrained("mistral_v2") # Mistral 7B v0.3, Codestral
# tokenizer = Tokenizer.from_pretrained("mistral_v3") # Mistral NeMo, Large 2
# tokenizer = Tokenizer.from_pretrained("whisper_v3") # OpenAI Whisper multilingual (v1/v2/v3)
# `from_pretrained` delegates to the same loader the Rust API uses, so a name
# means the same thing on both sides: it returns an `AnyTokenizer` for every
# bundled vocabulary, and `.family` names the backend it dispatched to.
# Encode and decode
=
=
# Batch encode (10-12x faster than tiktoken)
=
=
See the API Guide for complete documentation and examples.
Rust
[]
= "*" # or pin to a specific version
use from_pretrained;
// `from_pretrained` returns an `AnyTokenizer` — the universal loaded-tokenizer
// handle — for every bundled vocabulary, so the same code works whether the
// vocabulary needs the byte-level BPE backend or the SPM-BPE one (Mistral V1/V2).
let tokenizer = from_pretrained?;
let tokens = tokenizer.encode;
let batch_tokens = tokenizer.encode_batch;
let text = tokenizer.decode?;
encode, encode_raw, encode_with, encode_batch and decode are inherent methods on AnyTokenizer — no use splintr::Tokenize needed. The trait is still exported and still implemented by AnyTokenizer, for code generic over the tokenizer type.
To build a tokenizer from your own vocabulary rather than a bundled one, use Tokenizer::new(encoder, special_tokens, pattern) with one of the exported patterns (CL100K_BASE_PATTERN, O200K_BASE_PATTERN, LLAMA3_PATTERN, MISTRAL_V3_PATTERN, GPT2_PATTERN, QWEN2_PATTERN, …).
See the API Guide and docs.rs for complete Rust documentation.
Key Features
Performance where it matters:
- 10-12x faster batch encoding than tiktoken - Parallel processing across multiple texts using Rayon
- ~2-2.6x faster single text encoding than tiktoken - Optimized sequential algorithm for typical use cases
- Smart parallelization - Sequential for small texts (<1MB), parallel for large datasets
- LRU caching - Avoid redundant encoding of frequently seen text chunks
Built for production:
- Four backends, one handle - Byte-level/raw BPE, SentencePiece BPE, Unigram and WordPiece all load as an
AnyTokenizer, so the calling code is the same whichever the vocabulary needs - Three sources - Bundled vocabularies (below), any HuggingFace
tokenizer.json, or a GGUF vocabulary - Compatible vocabularies - Supports cl100k_base, o200k_base (OpenAI), Llama 3 family (Meta), DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek), Mistral V1/V2/V3 (Mistral AI), and Whisper multilingual (OpenAI)
- Streaming decoders - Real-time LLM output display with proper UTF-8 handling (guide)
- 54 agent tokens - Built-in support for chat, CoT reasoning, ReAct agents, tool calling, RAG citations (docs), appended above the reference vocabulary so no original id moves
- Special-token policy -
encode_ordinary/encode_allowed_specialso untrusted text cannot forge a control token (details) - Battle-tested algorithms - Regexr with JIT (pure Rust), Aho-Corasick for special tokens, linked-list BPE, SentencePiece BPE, SentencePiece unigram, WordPiece for BERT-family models
Cross-platform:
- Python bindings via PyO3 (Linux, macOS, Windows) — abi3 wheels, one per platform, CPython 3.8+
- Native Rust library for maximum performance
Performance Deep Dive
Every number on this page was measured by the scripts in benchmarks/ — benchmark_batch.py for the batch figures, benchmark_single.py for the single-text ones — on Linux (7.0.10-arch1-1), an AMD Ryzen 9 5900X with 24 logical cores, against tiktoken 0.8.0 (the reference Python implementation), Hugging Face tokenizers 0.22.1, and TokenDagger 0.1.1 on CPython 3.12. Absolute throughput moves with the hardware and with the versions of those libraries; the ratios are the part that carries across machines. Run the scripts yourself to get your own figures — see Running Benchmarks Yourself.
Every figure is the default pure-Rust regexr backend — what pip install splintr-rs gives you, since the published wheels are built without the optional pcre2 feature. The benchmark scripts report the optional PCRE2 backend as a separate splintr-pcre2 row and skip it when the feature is absent, so a figure labelled splintr is never a PCRE2 one. See Regex Backends for what PCRE2 changes.
The charts below were plotted from an earlier run, on different hardware and against different versions of the comparison libraries, so their absolute axes do not match the figures quoted in the text. Where the two disagree, the numbers in the text are the measured ones; the charts are kept for the shape they show, not their values.
Single Text Encoding
For single texts, splintr encodes ~2-2.6x faster than tiktoken across the five text types benchmark_single.py covers (short prose, medium prose, long prose, Python code, multilingual):

Latency by content type:

Consistent low latency across Python code, JSON, English prose, and Chinese text makes splintr ideal for interactive applications and real-time processing.
Batch Encoding
The real magic happens with batches. Splintr parallelizes across texts to achieve 10-12x speedup:

Higher speedups on larger batches where parallelization overhead is amortized. Perfect for:
- Training data preprocessing
- Bulk document tokenization
- API batch processing
- Data pipeline throughput
Design Decision: Sequential by Default
Splintr uses sequential encoding for single texts and parallel encoding across batches based on empirical benchmarking:

Key findings:
- Sequential is faster for texts up to ~1MB (typical LLM prompts and documents)
- Rayon's parallelization overhead only pays off at ~1MB+ text sizes
- Most real-world inputs are well under 1MB
encode()uses sequential processing for optimal single-text performanceencode_batch()parallelizes across multiple texts for maximum throughputencode_rayon()available for the rare cases where you have >1MB single texts
This architecture ensures splintr is optimized for the most common tokenization patterns in LLM applications.
Running Benchmarks Yourself
# Clone and install
# The two scripts that produced the figures above
# The broader suite, written to a file
benchmark.py covers single text encoding, batch encoding, streaming decoder performance, and special token handling across various content types. Expect different absolute numbers on different hardware and with different versions of the comparison libraries — record which you ran against before quoting a figure.
Regex Backends
Splintr uses a pure-Rust regex engine (regexr) by default, with optional PCRE2 support.
The two are not equally fast, and every performance figure on this page is the default one. Measured on the machine described above, PCRE2 encodes a single text about 1.1-1.5x faster than regexr — the gap widens on multilingual input — and is level on batch encoding, where Rayon rather than the regex engine sets the pace. Both produce identical token ids; the choice is a speed/dependency trade, not a correctness one. Quote a PCRE2 number only as a PCRE2 number: the published wheels do not carry the feature.
Default Backend (regexr):
- Pure Rust implementation (no C dependencies)
- JIT compilation and SIMD acceleration
- Native UTF-8 and Unicode property support
Optional PCRE2 Backend:
# Default: regexr backend (pure Rust)
=
# Optional: switch to PCRE2 (requires --features pcre2)
=
To enable PCRE2, build with the feature flag:
python has to be listed alongside it: --features replaces the default set rather than adding to it, and dropping the PyO3 feature leaves maturin with no binding to build.
Benchmarking:
# Compare backends (requires PCRE2 feature)
# Visual comparison with charts
Streaming Decoder
For real-time LLM applications where tokens arrive one at a time, Splintr provides a streaming decoder that handles UTF-8 boundary alignment:
# One decoder, built by the tokenizer itself — every vocabulary, every backend
=
# Process tokens as they arrive
Why streaming decoders? BPE tokens don't align with UTF-8 character boundaries. A multi-byte character like "世" might split across tokens. The streaming decoder buffers incomplete sequences and only outputs complete characters.
Why only one? There is no decoder to choose. streaming_decoder() takes every spelling rule from the tokenizer that built it — the ByteLevel alphabet (deepseek_v3, GPT-2), <0xNN> byte fallback, the ▁ metaspace substitution, and the special=true ids decode drops — so "".join(chunks) + flush() equals decode(ids) for any tokenizer. Pairing a decoder with the wrong kind of vocabulary, which used to yield mojibake silently, is not expressible.
See the API Guide for detailed usage, examples, and best practices.
Special Tokens in Untrusted Text
A tokenizer that matches special tokens will happily promote text that spells a control token to that token's real id. <|im_start|> typed by a user becomes the same id the server emits when it opens a turn — and downstream, nothing can tell the two apart. That is how a user message forges a system turn. Denylisting the literal spelling beforehand does not close it: the spelling is not the only thing that maps to the id.
So encoding takes an explicit mode. Rust calls it SpecialMode (All | Ordinary | Allow(&FxHashSet<String>)) and passes it to encode_with, which every backend and AnyTokenizer provide — inherently and through the Tokenize trait, which all five implement. Python exposes it as methods:
| Mode | Behaviour |
|---|---|
encode_with_special(text) / All |
Match every configured special token found in the text |
encode_ordinary(text) / Ordinary |
Match none — special spellings stay ordinary content |
encode_allowed_special(text, allowed) / Allow |
Match only the named tokens; raise on any other |
All three are on every Python tokenizer type — Tokenizer, AnyTokenizer, SpmTokenizer, SentencePieceTokenizer, WordPieceTokenizer — alongside encode (model-ready: boundary template applied, HF's default add_special_tokens=True), encode_raw (content tokens only, HF's add_special_tokens=False) and encode_batch. The same six methods mean the same thing on every class.
=
=
# Default: a literal control token in the text becomes the real control-token id.
# [128000, 128006, 9125, 128007, 198, 2675, 527, 3789, 13]
# Ordinary: never match a special token. The model's own boundary tokens
# (here BOS 128000) still come from the template — those two are independent.
# [128000, 27, 91, 2527, 8932, 851, 91, 29, 9125, 27, 91, 408, 8932, 851, 91,
# 397, 2675, 527, 3789, 13]
# Allow-list: anything outside it is rejected, naming the token and its offset.
# ValueError: special token "<|start_header_id|>" at byte offset 0 is not in
# the caller's allow-list
In Rust the same three modes, with PolicyError::DisallowedSpecial { token, offset } as the error (SpecialMode::Allow borrows the set, so one allow-list per endpoint costs no per-request allocation — it takes an FxHashSet, which splintr re-exports so you need no version-matched rustc-hash dependency of your own):
use ;
let tokenizer = from_pretrained?;
let ids = tokenizer.encode_with?;
let allowed: = .into_iter.collect;
let ids = tokenizer.encode_with?;
Every loader — from_pretrained in Rust and in Python, from_json, the GGUF loader — returns an AnyTokenizer that matches special tokens by default, so encode there is the All behaviour. (A Tokenizer you build yourself from a vocabulary file starts with matching off, since nothing has told it which added tokens exist.) Rather than reason about which handle you hold, say encode_ordinary or encode_allowed_special explicitly whenever the text is untrusted.
Supported Vocabularies
| Vocabulary | Used By | base_vocab_size |
Special Tokens | Pre-tokenizer (pretrained::patterns) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
cl100k_base |
GPT-4, GPT-3.5-turbo | 100,277 | 5 + 54 agent | CL100K_BASE_PATTERN |
o200k_base |
GPT-4o | 200,019 | 2 + 54 agent | O200K_BASE_PATTERN |
llama3 |
Llama 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 (Meta) | 128,256 | 11 + 54 agent | LLAMA3_PATTERN |
deepseek_v3 |
DeepSeek V3, DeepSeek R1 | 128,815 | 17 + 54 agent | DEEPSEEK_V3_PATTERNS (three passes) |
mistral_v1 |
Mistral 7B v0.1/v0.2, Mixtral 8x7B | 32,000 | 3 + 54 agent | none — SPM-BPE, no split regex |
mistral_v2 |
Mistral 7B v0.3, Codestral, 8x22B | 32,768 | 10 + 54 agent | none — SPM-BPE, no split regex |
mistral_v3 |
Mistral NeMo, Large 2, Pixtral | 131,072 | 10 + 54 agent | MISTRAL_V3_PATTERN |
whisper / whisper_v1 / whisper_v2 / whisper_v3 |
OpenAI Whisper multilingual (tiny..large-v3) | 51,865 (v1/v2), 51,866 (v3) | 1608 (no agent) | GPT2_PATTERN |
pretrained::patterns(vocab) returns Option<&'static [&'static str]>. It is None for Mistral V1/V2 — not "unknown", but "this vocabulary does not pre-tokenize with a regex": both run on the SPM-BPE backend, which segments by merging pieces and never applies a split pattern.
Whisper is a speech model, so it carries no agent tokens — its special tokens are the standard Whisper set (
<|startoftranscript|>, language tokens,<|transcribe|>/<|translate|>, 1501 timestamp tokens). Barewhisperresolves to v2. The English-only checkpoints (*.en) use a different base BPE and are not bundled; load those withfrom_json(below).
Loading any model from tokenizer.json
For models not bundled above, point splintr.from_json at a HuggingFace tokenizer.json. It returns an AnyTokenizer — the universal loaded-tokenizer handle, which dispatches internally to the right backend for the file's model.type while keeping everything else the file declares: the special-token policy, the decoder pipeline, and the ids to skip on decode:
= # BERT, T5, Gemma, Qwen, Whisper.en, ...
= # + [CLS]/[SEP]/<s> etc. (post_processor)
= # content tokens only
=
# "BPE" | "Unigram" | "WordPiece"
encode applies the model's post_processor template (HF's default encode); encode_raw returns content tokens alone (HF's add_special_tokens=False). decode runs the file's declared decoder chain (Replace, ByteFallback, Fuse, Strip, Metaspace, ByteLevel, WordPiece, BPEDecoder, Sequence) after dropping special=true ids, so files whose decoding is that chain — Mistral, Llama, Gemma — come back as text rather than raw pieces. Honored end-to-end: the multi-stage pre-tokenizer pipeline (ByteLevel, Split incl. invert, Digits, Punctuation/Contiguous, Sequence, add_prefix_space/prepend_scheme), the full ordered normalizer (Replace, Strip, Prepend, NFC/NFD/NFKC/NFKD, Precompiled charsmap, …), BPE merge order, and added_tokens matching. Verified id-for-id (content and with special tokens) against GPT-2, RoBERTa, Qwen, Whisper, T5, Albert, XLNet, BERT, DistilBERT, Falcon, StarCoder2, DeepSeek-Coder, GPT-NeoX.
Every family comes back as the same AnyTokenizer type; family names the backend it dispatches to internally (in Rust, AnyTokenizer::backend() borrows it as a Backend enum when you need a backend-specific API):
model.type |
tok.family |
Internal backend | Example models |
|---|---|---|---|
BPE (byte-level) |
"BPE" |
Tokenizer |
GPT-2, Whisper, Llama 3, Qwen, DeepSeek |
Unigram |
"Unigram" |
SentencePieceTokenizer |
T5, Gemma, Albert, XLNet |
WordPiece |
"WordPiece" |
WordPieceTokenizer |
BERT, DistilBERT, Electra |
A fourth backend, SpmTokenizer (family == "Spm"), covers llama.cpp-style SPM vocabularies — SentencePiece BPE, merge-by-rank rather than Viterbi. It is not reachable from tokenizer.json: it is what the bundled Mistral V1/V2 vocabularies use, and what the GGUF loader below produces for a llama vocabulary.
The split regex, byte-level flag, merge order, normalizer (including SentencePiece's Precompiled charsmap), and special tokens are all read from the file itself. Output is verified id-for-id against HuggingFace tokenizers across every family — GPT-2, RoBERTa, BART, Qwen, Whisper (BPE); T5, Albert, XLNet (Unigram); BERT, DistilBERT (WordPiece). (Rust: splintr::from_json_path / from_json_bytes.)
Strict by design. Rather than silently approximate a config it doesn't fully support (which would emit wrong tokens with no signal), from_json raises — UnsupportedModelType, UnsupportedNormalizer, InvalidNormalizerRegex, or UnsupportedPreTokenizer (a declared pre-tokenizer with no recognized split, so the pattern is never guessed).
OpenAI standard tokens:
- cl100k_base:
<|endoftext|>,<|fim_prefix|>,<|fim_middle|>,<|fim_suffix|>,<|endofprompt|> - o200k_base:
<|endoftext|>,<|endofprompt|>
Meta Llama 3 standard tokens:
- llama3:
<|begin_of_text|>,<|end_of_text|>,<|start_header_id|>,<|end_header_id|>,<|eot_id|>,<|eom_id|>(3.1+),<|python_tag|>(3.1+),<|step_id|>(3.2-Vision),<|image|>(3.2-Vision)
DeepSeek V3 standard tokens:
- deepseek_v3:
<|begin▁of▁sentence|>,<|end▁of▁sentence|>,<think>,</think>,<|User|>,<|Assistant|>,<|EOT|>, FIM tokens (<|fim▁hole|>,<|fim▁begin|>,<|fim▁end|>), tool calling tokens (<|tool▁calls▁begin|>,<|tool▁call▁begin|>, etc.)
Mistral standard tokens:
- mistral_v1:
<unk>,<s>,</s>(SentencePiece native) - mistral_v2: Same as V1 + control tokens:
[INST],[/INST],[TOOL_CALLS],[AVAILABLE_TOOLS],[/AVAILABLE_TOOLS],[TOOL_RESULTS],[/TOOL_RESULTS] - mistral_v3:
<unk>,<s>,</s>+ control tokens (Tekken/Tiktoken-based, NOT SentencePiece)
Loading a GGUF vocabulary
Splintr never opens a GGUF container. Parsing the header, the metadata key-value block and the tensor table is the model runtime's job, and pulling a GGUF parser into a tokenizer crate would make every consumer pay for it. What splintr owns is the tokenizer half: the caller fills a GgufVocab — one field per tokenizer.ggml.* key — and hands it to splintr::from_gguf_vocab, which returns the same AnyTokenizer every other loader does. (Rust-only; there is no Python binding for this loader.)
use ;
// Fields mirror the GGUF keys with the `tokenizer.ggml.` prefix dropped; every
// one but `tokens` is optional exactly as the key is, and `None` means "the
// file does not say" — never "false" or "zero", because the defaults differ per
// dialect and the loader is the one that knows them.
let tokenizer = from_gguf_vocab?;
tokenizer.ggml.model names the algorithm, and the four values in circulation are genuinely different algorithms over superficially similar data. The loader dispatches on it and rejects what it cannot honour rather than guessing:
tokenizer.ggml.model |
Backend | Algorithm |
|---|---|---|
gpt2 |
Tokenizer |
byte-level BPE over the explicit merges list |
llama |
SpmTokenizer |
SentencePiece BPE — scores are merge ranks |
t5 |
SentencePieceTokenizer |
Unigram, Viterbi — scores are log-probabilities |
bert |
WordPieceTokenizer |
greedy longest match with ## |
Collapsing these is not a rounding error, and the failure is invisible downstream: run Unigram Viterbi over a llama vocabulary and its ranks maximise the wrong objective (▁sourdough → ▁s|ou|rd|ou|gh); the ids stay in range, the embedding shapes stay right, and retrieval quietly degrades.
Boundary tokens live in the returned SpecialPolicy, not in the backend, so add_bos_token / add_eos_token are honoured in exactly one place. A bert vocabulary is wrapped in the [CLS] A [SEP] template built from the ids it names, through the same internal cls/sep policy constructor the tokenizer.json path uses — so encode on a GGUF and on the same model's tokenizer.json agree, instead of the GGUF returning bare content tokens for a CLS-pooling consumer to misread a content token as the sentence vector. Measured on all-MiniLM-L6-v2: "hello world" → [101, 7592, 2088, 102]. A vocabulary naming neither id keeps the identity policy — inventing one would be worse than placing none.
Because the template is applied after encoding, a caller enforcing a maximum length must truncate the content first: SpecialPolicy::single_overhead() (reachable as tokenizer.policy().single_overhead()) reports how many slots the single-sequence template adds, so the content budget is max_len - single_overhead().
Agent Tokens (54 per model)
Splintr extends all vocabularies with 54 specialized tokens for building agent systems:
=
=
=
# 100282
# 100292
| Category | Example Tokens | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Conversation | system, user, assistant, im_start, im_end |
ChatML format |
| Thinking | think |
Chain-of-Thought reasoning |
| ReAct | plan, step, act, observe |
Agent action loops |
| Tools | function, result, error |
Function calling |
| RAG | context, quote, cite, source |
Citations |
Agent tokens never disturb the original vocabulary. They are appended strictly above every id the reference vocabulary uses, so no original id is shifted and none can collide — ordinary text encodes to exactly the ids the reference tokenizer produces. cl100k_base's reference tops out at 100276 and its agent tokens occupy 100277–100330; llama3's tops out at 128255 with agent tokens at 128256–128353.
Sizing against the reference vocabulary
base_vocab_size reports a vocabulary's size as its upstream reference defines it — without splintr's agent tokens. That is the number you need to size a model's embedding or logit layer, or to identify which vocabulary a checkpoint uses from the shape of its token-embedding tensor: both must match the checkpoint's vocabulary, not splintr's extended one. Because agent tokens sit above everything, it is also exactly the id at which splintr's additions begin.
=
# 100331 — extended (base + 54 agent)
# 100277 — what tiktoken reports
# 128256
# 131072
It is not vocab_size - 54: several reference vocabularies leave gaps below their nominal size (llama3 is 128256 against an extended 128354; deepseek_v3 is 128815 against 128954), so the difference varies per vocabulary. In Rust: splintr::pretrained::base_vocab_size(vocab) (or base_vocab_size_by_name).
See docs/special_tokens.md for the complete list and API Guide for usage examples.
How It Works
Splintr implements several optimizations that make tokenization faster:
- Regexr with JIT compilation: Pure Rust regex engine with SIMD acceleration
- Rayon parallelism: Leverages multiple CPU cores for batch encoding
- Linked-list BPE algorithm: Avoids O(N²) complexity on pathological inputs
- SentencePiece Unigram: Viterbi maximum-score segmentation (true Unigram, not greedy) with byte fallback, for T5/Gemma-style models loaded via
from_json - SentencePiece BPE: merge-by-score segmentation with byte fallback, for Mistral V1/V2
- WordPiece tokenizer: BERT-compatible subword tokenization with
##continuation prefix, BasicTokenizer preprocessing (lowercase, accent stripping, punctuation splitting). Accent stripping is its own setting (with_strip_accents), seeded fromlowercaseand overridable independently — HuggingFace'sstrip_accents.unwrap_or(lowercase), which is what cased multilingual BERT (strip_accents: false) needs - FxHashMap: Faster lookups than default SipHash for non-adversarial contexts
- Aho-Corasick for special tokens: Fast multi-pattern matching without regex alternation
- LRU cache: Avoids redundant BPE encoding of frequently seen chunks
Use Cases
LLM Applications:
- Tokenizing prompts with ~2-2.6x lower latency than tiktoken
- Streaming decoder for real-time output display
- Token counting for API cost estimation
Agent Systems:
- Building ReAct agents with structured reasoning tokens
- Tool-calling systems with function tokens
- Chain-of-Thought reasoning with thinking tokens
Training Pipelines:
- Fast batch encoding of large datasets (10-12x speedup)
- Preprocessing millions of documents efficiently
- Parallel tokenization across distributed systems
RAG Applications:
- Structured context injection with citation tokens
- Document chunking with section markers
- Source tracking through tokenization
Data Processing:
- Bulk document tokenization
- Multi-language text processing
- Real-time text preprocessing
Contributing
Contributions are welcome! Here's how you can help:
- Report bugs: Open an issue with a minimal reproduction case
- Suggest features: Describe your use case and why the feature would be helpful
- Submit pull requests:
- Add tests for new functionality
- Run the checks below before submitting — they are the same gates CI runs
- Update documentation as needed, and add a
## [Unreleased]entry in CHANGELOG.md for anything user-visible
Development Setup
# Clone the repository
# Install pre-commit hook (recommended)
# Build the Rust library
# Minimal build: no Rayon, no regexr JIT/SIMD
# Build Python bindings
# Run tests
# Lint, docs and dependency gates
RUSTDOCFLAGS="-D warnings"
The pre-commit hook automatically runs formatting, clippy, and tests before each commit.
CI runs all of the above on Linux, macOS and Windows, plus a wasm32-unknown-unknown / wasm32-wasip1 compile check and every feature combination that ships. Releases go through Release Prepare (tag → version and changelog validation → full suite → wheels + sdist) and then a manually dispatched Release that publishes exactly those artifacts.
Release ordering: regexr ships first. Cargo.toml requires regexr = "0.1.5", which is not yet on crates.io — it resolves here only through a gitignored .cargo/config.toml [patch.crates-io] entry pointing at a sibling checkout, and the committed Cargo.lock carries no source or checksum for it. Nothing resolves on a clean machine until that version is published, so splintr 0.12.0 cannot be released — and CI cannot go green on a fresh checkout — until regexr 0.1.5 is on crates.io.
Differential testing against the reference implementations
Unit tests fix the behaviour splintr already knows about; correctness against the real tokenizers is established differentially, on three levels.
In CI, with no model files and no Python. tests/reference_parity.rs diffs every bundled vocabulary against committed fixtures in tests/fixtures/pretrained/, on both token ids and decoded text — encode and decode are separate pipelines, and pinning only ids leaves byte-level unmapping, byte fallback and the SentencePiece dummy-prefix strip unpinned. Each fixture is captured by scripts/extract_reference_cases.py from whichever tool is authoritative for that vocabulary, and the script refuses to write one unless the reference provably is the vocabulary splintr embeds:
# OpenAI vocabularies: the `tiktoken` package, gated on every mergeable rank
# HF-published vocabularies: `tokenizers`, gated on vocab size + a 256-id sample
# SentencePiece vocabularies: `sentencepiece`, gated on every piece and score
tests/decode_agreement.rs runs alongside it and needs no reference at all: it asserts that for every bundled vocabulary, every backend reachable from it and every chunk size, streaming decode concatenated with flush() equals whole-sequence decode/decode_lossy, and that reset() leaves a decoder byte-identical to a fresh one.
Before a release, against the real models on your machine. scripts/verify_external_models.py sweeps splintr's from_json loader and its bundled SentencePiece vocabularies across a shelf of published model tokenizers, printing one pass/fail row per target. It never skips: an absent model directory, an absent target file, or an installed splintr wheel that is not this checkout's version each abort or fail the run rather than shrinking it to whatever happened to be present.
To find new bugs. scripts/fuzz_reference.py diffs splintr against tokenizers, transformers (slow, sentencepiece-backed) or tiktoken — auto-detected per target — using random strings assembled from each vocabulary's own added and special tokens, joined with no separator. That is the shape prose corpora cannot reach and where the bugs actually live (lstrip/rstrip on added tokens, the SentencePiece dummy prefix, decoder pipelines). Runs are deterministic via --seed, and a failing case is shrunk fragment-by-fragment to a minimal reproducer before it is printed.
# a HuggingFace tokenizer.json (reference auto-detected as `tokenizers`)
# a bundled vocabulary against a local reference model dir (`transformers`)
# bundled OpenAI vocabularies (`tiktoken`)
# GGUF loader against llama.cpp's own .inp/.out fixtures
Measured baselines, all zero failures (totals are cases × modes): bge-m3 25,000/25,000, Mistral V1 + V2 8,056/8,056, DeepSeek V3 8,000/8,000. The GGUF loader passes every vocabulary examples/verify_gguf.rs covers: llama.cpp's own 13 at 46/46 cases each, plus embeddinggemma, mistral-7b and bge-m3 at 74/74 against sentencepiece/tokenizers. A drop below any of those at the same --seed/--cases is a regression.
Acknowledgments
Splintr builds upon concepts from:
- tiktoken - OpenAI's reference BPE tokenizer
- SentencePiece - Google's unsupervised text tokenizer
- tokenizers - Hugging Face's tokenization library
The performance optimizations are informed by profiling real-world usage patterns in LLM applications.
Citation
If you use Splintr in your research, please cite:
License
MIT — see LICENSE.