omni-dev 0.46.0

//! Ancestor folder-chain resolution for `crate::drive::write_gate` (issue
//! #1574).
//!
//! Impure sibling to `write_gate` — mirrors `crate::drive::file_move`'s
//! role relative to `crate::drive::visibility`: this module does the
//! fetching, `write_gate` does the (pure) classifying.
//!
//! Despite the name it is not only about folders: since issue #1612 a rule
//! may name a **file id**, and [`resolve_decision_for_file_target`] is the
//! single entry point for a file target — it checks that rule before
//! walking (or, for a target with no visible parents, instead of walking)
//! any ancestor chain.

use anyhow::Result;

use crate::drive::files_api::FilesApi;
use crate::drive::types::DriveFile;
use crate::drive::write_gate::{self, Decision, DriveOperation, FolderPermissionRule};

/// Defensive cap against a cyclic or pathological parent chain, mirroring
/// `crate::drive::permissions_api::MAX_PERMISSIONS`'s rationale.
const MAX_CHAIN_DEPTH: usize = 100;

/// A target folder's resolved ancestor chain.
///
/// `folders[0]` is the target folder itself, `folders[1]` its parent, and
/// so on up to Drive's root (whose `parents` is empty).
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct AncestorChain {
    /// The chain, in walk order (depth 0 first).
    pub folders: Vec<DriveFile>,
}

impl AncestorChain {
    /// The folder ids in walk order, ready for `write_gate::resolve`.
    #[must_use]
    pub fn folder_ids(&self) -> Vec<String> {
        self.folders.iter().map(|f| f.id.clone()).collect()
    }
}

/// Walks `start_folder_id` → parent → grandparent → ... via `files.get`,
/// stopping at Drive's root (a folder with no `parents`).
///
/// **Any** failure — a `files.get` error, or exceeding [`MAX_CHAIN_DEPTH`]
/// — is an `Err`, never a silently truncated `Ok` chain: a truncated chain
/// could hide a deny/allow rule configured above the truncation point.
/// This is the same hard invariant [ADR-0070](../../docs/adrs/adr-0070.md)
/// §3 established for `permissions.list` fetch failures (no
/// `unwrap_or_default()` empty-set fallback) — callers must turn this
/// `Err` into a refusal, never a silent default-allow.
///
/// v1 boundary: a folder with a legacy multi-parent (rare — Drive no
/// longer permits creating new multi-parent folders) walks its *first*
/// parent only, beyond depth 0.
pub async fn resolve_ancestor_chain(
    files_api: &FilesApi<'_>,
    start_folder_id: &str,
) -> Result<AncestorChain> {
    let mut folders = Vec::new();
    let mut current_id = start_folder_id.to_string();
    loop {
        anyhow::ensure!(
            folders.len() < MAX_CHAIN_DEPTH,
            "folder ancestry for '{start_folder_id}' exceeds {MAX_CHAIN_DEPTH} levels; \
             refusing to resolve a possibly-cyclic or pathological chain rather than \
             truncating it"
        );
        let folder = files_api.get_metadata(&current_id).await?;
        let next_parent = folder.parents.first().cloned();
        folders.push(folder);
        match next_parent {
            Some(parent_id) => current_id = parent_id,
            None => break,
        }
    }
    Ok(AncestorChain { folders })
}

/// Resolves `op` against `start_folder_id`'s ancestor chain under `rules`,
/// walking one `files.get` at a time and stopping as soon as some depth
/// decides it.
///
/// [`write_gate::resolve`]'s "closest ancestor wins" tie-break means that
/// once *any* depth in the chain has a matching rule, nothing farther up
/// can ever produce a closer match — so unlike [`resolve_ancestor_chain`]
/// (which a caller wanting the *full* chain, e.g. for display, should keep
/// using), this never walks past the first decisive depth. Equivalent to
/// `write_gate::resolve(&resolve_ancestor_chain(..).await?.folder_ids(), op, rules)`,
/// but touches only as many ancestors as necessary instead of always
/// walking to Drive's root. The same fetch-failure-is-always-`Err`
/// invariant [`resolve_ancestor_chain`] documents applies here too.
pub async fn resolve_decision(
    files_api: &FilesApi<'_>,
    start_folder_id: &str,
    op: DriveOperation,
    rules: &[FolderPermissionRule],
) -> Result<Decision> {
    let start = files_api.get_metadata(start_folder_id).await?;
    resolve_decision_from(files_api, start, op, rules).await
}

/// [`resolve_decision`], but for a caller that already has the starting
/// folder's metadata in hand.
///
/// Avoids re-fetching `start` as this walk's own first `files.get`.
/// Shared by the private `resolve_decision_for_parents` and `drive
/// permissions check`'s folder-target path.
pub async fn resolve_decision_from(
    files_api: &FilesApi<'_>,
    start: DriveFile,
    op: DriveOperation,
    rules: &[FolderPermissionRule],
) -> Result<Decision> {
    let start_id = start.id.clone();
    let mut next_parent = start.parents.first().cloned();
    let mut folder_ids = vec![start.id];
    loop {
        // Re-resolving against the whole chain fetched so far on every
        // iteration is O(chain_len × rules_len) instead of O(rules_len)
        // once — negligible against a typically-small configured rule
        // list, and it's what lets this reuse `write_gate::resolve`
        // verbatim rather than re-implementing its tie-break logic here.
        let decision = write_gate::resolve(&folder_ids, op, rules);
        if decision.decided_by.is_some() {
            return Ok(decision);
        }
        let Some(parent_id) = next_parent else {
            return Ok(decision);
        };
        anyhow::ensure!(
            folder_ids.len() < MAX_CHAIN_DEPTH,
            "folder ancestry for '{start_id}' exceeds {MAX_CHAIN_DEPTH} levels; refusing to \
             resolve a possibly-cyclic or pathological chain rather than truncating it"
        );
        let folder = files_api.get_metadata(&parent_id).await?;
        next_parent = folder.parents.first().cloned();
        folder_ids.push(folder.id);
    }
}

/// How a file target's verdict was reached.
///
/// Matched exhaustively by every caller, so a future source cannot be
/// silently mishandled.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub enum DecisionSource {
    /// A `file_id` rule named the target itself. No `files.get` on any
    /// parent was issued — and none could have changed the verdict, since
    /// a file rule sits at depth −1.
    FileRule,
    /// The target's current parent chain(s) decided it, or fell through to
    /// the default policy with a chain actually resolved.
    FolderChain,
    /// The target has no parents this account can see **and** no file rule
    /// named this operation — the one case where no folder id the operator
    /// could name would ever help. `decision` is the bare default policy,
    /// *not* a forced refusal: `Read` still defaults to allow, so a
    /// caller that wants to refuse must check the verdict too.
    NoVisibleParents,
}

/// The full evaluation of a **file** target.
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct FileTargetDecision {
    /// The verdict, and the rule that decided it.
    pub decision: Decision,
    /// The single folder the chain resolved through, when the target had
    /// exactly one parent. Always `None` for `FileRule` and
    /// `NoVisibleParents`, neither of which walks a chain.
    pub resolved_folder_id: Option<String>,
    /// How the verdict was reached.
    pub source: DecisionSource,
    /// Whether a write acting on `decision` needs a valid Drive write lease
    /// ([`write_gate::decided_rule_requires_lease`], ADR-0080 §1/§13).
    ///
    /// Computed **here**, not by re-deriving it from `decision.decided_by`
    /// after the fact: for a legacy multi-parent target,
    /// [`write_gate::combine_across_parents`] keeps only the *winning*
    /// parent's `decided_by`, discarding every other parent's — including
    /// one whose rule required a lease. Re-querying
    /// `decided_rule_requires_lease` against the single surviving
    /// `decided_by` would silently drop that requirement whenever the
    /// winning parent's own rule happened to opt out. This field is instead
    /// the OR of each contributing parent's own requirement, computed
    /// before its `decided_by` is folded away — see
    /// [`resolve_decision_for_parents`].
    ///
    /// Meaningless on its own for an operation that can never take a
    /// lease in the first place (`Read`/`Create`/`Upload`/`Trash` —
    /// [`DriveOperation::ever_requires_lease`], issue #1917): this field
    /// answers only "does a matching rule opt out", never "can this
    /// operation be asked at all". The Trash engine ignores this field
    /// under ADR-0092. `drive permissions check`, whose `op` is
    /// caller-supplied, applies
    /// `ever_requires_lease` on top of this field rather than trusting
    /// it alone. A future caller that also accepts an arbitrary `op`
    /// must do the same.
    pub requires_lease: bool,
}

/// Resolves `op` for a file target whose metadata the caller already has.
///
/// **This is the only entry point for a file target**, and the reason
/// `resolve_decision_for_parents` below is private rather than `pub`: this
/// function owns the ordering — a `file_id` rule first, then the
/// current-parent chains, then the no-visible-parents case — so `drive
/// sheets write`, `drive edit` and `drive permissions check` cannot drift
/// apart on it.
///
/// The short-circuit is exact rather than an optimization: a file rule
/// sits at depth −1, so no folder rule at any depth of any parent chain
/// can beat it, and skipping the walk cannot change the verdict. That is
/// the same argument that already licenses [`resolve_decision_from`]'s
/// early return — and it is what makes a file **shared by link or email**
/// grantable at all, since such a target has no chain to walk.
///
/// The fetch-failure-is-always-`Err` invariant [`resolve_ancestor_chain`]
/// documents applies to the chain-walking branch.
pub async fn resolve_decision_for_file_target(
    files_api: &FilesApi<'_>,
    target: &DriveFile,
    op: DriveOperation,
    rules: &[FolderPermissionRule],
) -> Result<FileTargetDecision> {
    if let Some(decision) = write_gate::resolve_file_rule(&target.id, op, rules) {
        let requires_lease =
            write_gate::decided_rule_requires_lease(decision.decided_by.as_ref(), op, rules);
        return Ok(FileTargetDecision {
            decision,
            resolved_folder_id: None,
            source: DecisionSource::FileRule,
            requires_lease,
        });
    }
    if target.parents.is_empty() {
        let decision = write_gate::resolve(&[], op, rules);
        let requires_lease =
            write_gate::decided_rule_requires_lease(decision.decided_by.as_ref(), op, rules);
        return Ok(FileTargetDecision {
            decision,
            resolved_folder_id: None,
            source: DecisionSource::NoVisibleParents,
            requires_lease,
        });
    }
    let (decision, resolved_folder_id, requires_lease) =
        resolve_decision_for_parents(files_api, &target.parents, op, rules).await?;
    Ok(FileTargetDecision {
        decision,
        resolved_folder_id,
        source: DecisionSource::FolderChain,
        requires_lease,
    })
}

/// Resolves `op` against `parents` (a target's *current* parent ids).
///
/// Combines the per-parent [`Decision`]s via
/// [`write_gate::combine_across_parents`] for a legacy multi-parent target
/// (deny wins across parents). Also returns the single resolved folder id
/// when there's exactly one parent — `None` for an orphan target or a
/// multi-parent target, where no single folder id would be accurate.
///
/// Also returns whether the combined decision needs a lease, computed as
/// the OR of **every** parent's own `decided_rule_requires_lease` result —
/// each evaluated against that parent's own `decided_by`, before
/// [`write_gate::combine_across_parents`] discards every `decided_by` but
/// the winning one. Re-deriving the requirement from only the combined
/// `Decision` afterward would silently drop it whenever the surviving
/// parent's rule happened to opt out, even though a losing (but still
/// `Allow`) parent's rule required one — the safe direction this gate takes
/// everywhere else.
///
/// **Private on purpose** (issue #1612): every file target must go through
/// [`resolve_decision_for_file_target`], which consults `file_id` rules
/// first. A caller reaching this primitive directly would skip that step
/// and silently refuse a file that was explicitly granted — so the
/// restriction is a compile error rather than a convention.
async fn resolve_decision_for_parents(
    files_api: &FilesApi<'_>,
    parents: &[String],
    op: DriveOperation,
    rules: &[FolderPermissionRule],
) -> Result<(Decision, Option<String>, bool)> {
    let Some((first_parent, rest_parents)) = parents.split_first() else {
        let decision = write_gate::resolve(&[], op, rules);
        let requires_lease =
            write_gate::decided_rule_requires_lease(decision.decided_by.as_ref(), op, rules);
        return Ok((decision, None, requires_lease));
    };
    let mut combined = resolve_decision(files_api, first_parent, op, rules).await?;
    let mut requires_lease =
        write_gate::decided_rule_requires_lease(combined.decided_by.as_ref(), op, rules);
    for parent_id in rest_parents {
        let decision = resolve_decision(files_api, parent_id, op, rules).await?;
        requires_lease |=
            write_gate::decided_rule_requires_lease(decision.decided_by.as_ref(), op, rules);
        combined = write_gate::combine_across_parents(combined, [decision]);
    }
    let resolved_folder_id = rest_parents.is_empty().then(|| first_parent.clone());
    Ok((combined, resolved_folder_id, requires_lease))
}

#[cfg(test)]
#[allow(clippy::unwrap_used, clippy::expect_used)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;
    use crate::drive::auth::{DriveCredentials, DriveGrantedScopes};
    use crate::drive::client::DriveClient;
    use crate::utils::secret::Secret;

    fn test_credentials() -> DriveCredentials {
        DriveCredentials {
            client_id: "client-1".to_string(),
            client_secret: Secret::new("secret-1"),
            refresh_token: Secret::new("refresh-1"),
            scope: DriveGrantedScopes::READONLY,
        }
    }

    async fn client_with_bootstrapped_token(server: &wiremock::MockServer) -> DriveClient {
        wiremock::Mock::given(wiremock::matchers::method("POST"))
            .and(wiremock::matchers::path("/token"))
            .respond_with(
                wiremock::ResponseTemplate::new(200).set_body_json(serde_json::json!({
                    "access_token": "test-token",
                    "expires_in": 3600,
                })),
            )
            .mount(server)
            .await;

        let mut client = DriveClient::new(&server.uri(), &test_credentials()).unwrap();
        crate::drive::client::test_support::replace_session(
            &mut client,
            &test_credentials(),
            &format!("{}/token", server.uri()),
        );
        client
    }

    fn mount_folder(id: &str, parent: Option<&str>) -> wiremock::Mock {
        let parents: Vec<&str> = parent.into_iter().collect();
        wiremock::Mock::given(wiremock::matchers::method("GET"))
            .and(wiremock::matchers::path(format!("/drive/v3/files/{id}")))
            .respond_with(
                wiremock::ResponseTemplate::new(200).set_body_json(serde_json::json!({
                    "id": id,
                    "name": id,
                    "mimeType": "application/vnd.google-apps.folder",
                    "parents": parents,
                })),
            )
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn resolves_a_single_folder_with_no_parent_as_a_one_element_chain() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        mount_folder("root", None).mount(&server).await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);

        let chain = resolve_ancestor_chain(&files_api, "root").await.unwrap();
        assert_eq!(chain.folder_ids(), vec!["root".to_string()]);
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn walks_the_full_ancestor_chain_via_files_get() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        mount_folder("child", Some("parent")).mount(&server).await;
        mount_folder("parent", Some("grandparent"))
            .mount(&server)
            .await;
        mount_folder("grandparent", None).mount(&server).await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);

        let chain = resolve_ancestor_chain(&files_api, "child").await.unwrap();
        assert_eq!(
            chain.folder_ids(),
            vec![
                "child".to_string(),
                "parent".to_string(),
                "grandparent".to_string(),
            ]
        );
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn legacy_multi_parent_folder_walks_the_first_parent_only() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        wiremock::Mock::given(wiremock::matchers::method("GET"))
            .and(wiremock::matchers::path("/drive/v3/files/child"))
            .respond_with(
                wiremock::ResponseTemplate::new(200).set_body_json(serde_json::json!({
                    "id": "child",
                    "name": "child",
                    "mimeType": "application/vnd.google-apps.folder",
                    "parents": ["first-parent", "second-parent"],
                })),
            )
            .mount(&server)
            .await;
        mount_folder("first-parent", None).mount(&server).await;
        // Deliberately no mock for "second-parent" — asserting it's never
        // fetched proves the documented v1 boundary (first-parent-only).
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);

        let chain = resolve_ancestor_chain(&files_api, "child").await.unwrap();
        assert_eq!(
            chain.folder_ids(),
            vec!["child".to_string(), "first-parent".to_string()]
        );
    }

    /// The single highest-value test in this module (mirrors ADR-0070 §3's
    /// `permissions.list`-failure precedent): a fetch failure mid-walk must
    /// be an explicit `Err`, never a chain silently truncated at the point
    /// of failure — a truncated chain could hide a deny/allow rule
    /// configured on an ancestor above the failure point, manufacturing a
    /// false "no rule applies here" reading.
    #[tokio::test]
    async fn ancestor_chain_fetch_failure_returns_err_not_a_truncated_chain() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        mount_folder("child", Some("parent")).mount(&server).await;
        wiremock::Mock::given(wiremock::matchers::method("GET"))
            .and(wiremock::matchers::path("/drive/v3/files/parent"))
            .respond_with(wiremock::ResponseTemplate::new(500).set_body_string("server error"))
            .mount(&server)
            .await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);

        let result = resolve_ancestor_chain(&files_api, "child").await;
        assert!(
            result.is_err(),
            "a mid-walk fetch failure must be Err, not an Ok chain truncated at \"child\""
        );
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn missing_start_folder_is_an_error() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        wiremock::Mock::given(wiremock::matchers::method("GET"))
            .and(wiremock::matchers::path("/drive/v3/files/missing"))
            .respond_with(wiremock::ResponseTemplate::new(404).set_body_string("not found"))
            .mount(&server)
            .await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);

        let result = resolve_ancestor_chain(&files_api, "missing").await;
        assert!(result.is_err());
    }

    // ── resolve_decision / resolve_decision_from ───────────────────────

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn resolve_decision_stops_walking_once_a_rule_decides_it() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        mount_folder("child", Some("parent")).mount(&server).await;
        // Deliberately no mock for "parent" — "child" already has a
        // matching rule, so a correctly short-circuiting walk never fetches
        // it; wiremock panics with "no matching mock" if it does.
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);
        let rules = [FolderPermissionRule {
            folder_id: Some("child".to_string()),
            file_id: None,
            recursive: false,
            allow: std::iter::once(DriveOperation::Create).collect(),
            deny: std::collections::HashSet::default(),
            require_lease: true,
        }];

        let decision = resolve_decision(&files_api, "child", DriveOperation::Create, &rules)
            .await
            .unwrap();
        assert_eq!(decision.verdict, write_gate::Verdict::Allow);
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn resolve_decision_walks_to_root_when_nothing_matches() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        mount_folder("child", Some("parent")).mount(&server).await;
        mount_folder("parent", Some("grandparent"))
            .mount(&server)
            .await;
        mount_folder("grandparent", None).mount(&server).await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);

        let decision = resolve_decision(&files_api, "child", DriveOperation::Create, &[])
            .await
            .unwrap();
        assert_eq!(decision.verdict, write_gate::Verdict::Deny);
        assert_eq!(decision.decided_by, None);
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn resolve_decision_fetch_failure_returns_err_not_allow() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        mount_folder("child", Some("parent")).mount(&server).await;
        wiremock::Mock::given(wiremock::matchers::method("GET"))
            .and(wiremock::matchers::path("/drive/v3/files/parent"))
            .respond_with(wiremock::ResponseTemplate::new(500).set_body_string("server error"))
            .mount(&server)
            .await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);

        let result = resolve_decision(&files_api, "child", DriveOperation::Create, &[]).await;
        assert!(result.is_err());
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn resolve_decision_from_never_refetches_the_supplied_start() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        // Deliberately no mock at all — proves resolve_decision_from never
        // issues a files.get for the folder its caller already fetched.
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);
        let start = DriveFile {
            id: "child".to_string(),
            name: "child".to_string(),
            mime_type: "application/vnd.google-apps.folder".to_string(),
            parents: vec![],
            ..Default::default()
        };
        let rules = [FolderPermissionRule {
            folder_id: Some("child".to_string()),
            file_id: None,
            recursive: false,
            allow: std::iter::once(DriveOperation::Read).collect(),
            deny: std::collections::HashSet::default(),
            require_lease: true,
        }];

        let decision = resolve_decision_from(&files_api, start, DriveOperation::Read, &rules)
            .await
            .unwrap();
        assert_eq!(decision.verdict, write_gate::Verdict::Allow);
    }

    // ── resolve_decision_for_parents ────────────────────────────────────

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn resolve_decision_for_parents_empty_parents_uses_default_policy() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);

        let (decision, resolved_folder_id, requires_lease) =
            resolve_decision_for_parents(&files_api, &[], DriveOperation::Edit, &[])
                .await
                .unwrap();
        assert_eq!(decision.verdict, write_gate::Verdict::Deny);
        assert_eq!(resolved_folder_id, None);
        assert!(requires_lease, "no decided_by defaults to requiring one");
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn resolve_decision_for_parents_single_parent_reports_its_folder_id() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        mount_folder("parent-1", None).mount(&server).await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);
        let rules = [FolderPermissionRule {
            folder_id: Some("parent-1".to_string()),
            file_id: None,
            recursive: false,
            allow: std::iter::once(DriveOperation::Edit).collect(),
            deny: std::collections::HashSet::default(),
            require_lease: true,
        }];

        let (decision, resolved_folder_id, _requires_lease) = resolve_decision_for_parents(
            &files_api,
            &["parent-1".to_string()],
            DriveOperation::Edit,
            &rules,
        )
        .await
        .unwrap();
        assert_eq!(decision.verdict, write_gate::Verdict::Allow);
        assert_eq!(resolved_folder_id, Some("parent-1".to_string()));
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn resolve_decision_for_parents_deny_wins_across_parents_and_reports_no_single_folder() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        mount_folder("allow-parent", None).mount(&server).await;
        mount_folder("deny-parent", None).mount(&server).await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);
        let rules = [
            FolderPermissionRule {
                folder_id: Some("allow-parent".to_string()),
                file_id: None,
                recursive: false,
                allow: std::iter::once(DriveOperation::Edit).collect(),
                deny: std::collections::HashSet::default(),
                require_lease: true,
            },
            FolderPermissionRule {
                folder_id: Some("deny-parent".to_string()),
                file_id: None,
                recursive: false,
                allow: std::collections::HashSet::default(),
                deny: std::iter::once(DriveOperation::Edit).collect(),
                require_lease: true,
            },
        ];

        let (decision, resolved_folder_id, _requires_lease) = resolve_decision_for_parents(
            &files_api,
            &["allow-parent".to_string(), "deny-parent".to_string()],
            DriveOperation::Edit,
            &rules,
        )
        .await
        .unwrap();
        assert_eq!(decision.verdict, write_gate::Verdict::Deny);
        assert_eq!(resolved_folder_id, None);
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn resolve_decision_for_parents_lease_requirement_is_the_or_of_every_parent_even_though_only_one_decides_the_verdict(
    ) {
        // Regression test: `combine_across_parents` keeps only the winning
        // parent's `decided_by` (issue #1664's multi-parent lease-bypass
        // fix). Here both parents Allow — `lenient-parent` opts out of the
        // lease and, because `combine_across_parents` folds left-to-right
        // and keeps the *later* decision on an Allow/Allow tie, its
        // decision is what the combined `Decision` reports. `strict-parent`
        // still requires a lease, and it must not be silently dropped.
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        mount_folder("strict-parent", None).mount(&server).await;
        mount_folder("lenient-parent", None).mount(&server).await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);
        let rules = [
            FolderPermissionRule::folder("strict-parent").allowing([DriveOperation::Edit]),
            FolderPermissionRule::folder("lenient-parent")
                .allowing([DriveOperation::Edit])
                .requiring_lease(false),
        ];

        let (decision, _resolved_folder_id, requires_lease) = resolve_decision_for_parents(
            &files_api,
            &["strict-parent".to_string(), "lenient-parent".to_string()],
            DriveOperation::Edit,
            &rules,
        )
        .await
        .unwrap();
        assert_eq!(decision.verdict, write_gate::Verdict::Allow);
        assert!(
            requires_lease,
            "strict-parent's lease requirement must survive even though \
             lenient-parent's decision is the one the combined verdict reports"
        );
    }

    // ── file targets (issue #1612) ────────────────────────────────────

    fn target_file(id: &str, parents: &[&str]) -> DriveFile {
        DriveFile {
            id: id.to_string(),
            name: format!("{id}-name"),
            parents: parents.iter().map(|p| (*p).to_string()).collect(),
            ..DriveFile::default()
        }
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn a_file_rule_decides_without_fetching_any_parent() {
        // The load-bearing test for issue #1612. The target names a parent
        // that is deliberately NOT mounted: if the walk happens at all,
        // wiremock panics with "no matching mock". That is what makes the
        // short-circuit an assertion rather than a claim — and it is the
        // same property that lets a link-shared file with *no* visible
        // parent be granted.
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);
        let rules = [FolderPermissionRule::file("target").allowing([DriveOperation::SheetsWrite])];

        let evaluated = resolve_decision_for_file_target(
            &files_api,
            &target_file("target", &["never-mounted"]),
            DriveOperation::SheetsWrite,
            &rules,
        )
        .await
        .unwrap();

        assert_eq!(evaluated.decision.verdict, write_gate::Verdict::Allow);
        assert_eq!(evaluated.source, DecisionSource::FileRule);
        assert_eq!(evaluated.resolved_folder_id, None);
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn a_parentless_target_with_no_file_rule_reports_no_visible_parents() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);

        let evaluated = resolve_decision_for_file_target(
            &files_api,
            &target_file("orphan", &[]),
            DriveOperation::SheetsWrite,
            &[],
        )
        .await
        .unwrap();

        assert_eq!(evaluated.source, DecisionSource::NoVisibleParents);
        assert_eq!(evaluated.decision.verdict, write_gate::Verdict::Deny);
        assert_eq!(evaluated.decision.decided_by, None);
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn no_visible_parents_still_allows_read_by_default_policy() {
        // `NoVisibleParents` is a *why*, not a verdict: forcing it to deny
        // would break reading a shared file, which defaults to allow.
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);

        let evaluated = resolve_decision_for_file_target(
            &files_api,
            &target_file("orphan", &[]),
            DriveOperation::Read,
            &[],
        )
        .await
        .unwrap();

        assert_eq!(evaluated.source, DecisionSource::NoVisibleParents);
        assert_eq!(evaluated.decision.verdict, write_gate::Verdict::Allow);
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn a_file_allow_beats_a_denying_parent() {
        // `combine_across_parents`' deny-wins is a tie-break among peers.
        // A file rule is not a peer — it sits at depth −1 — so it wins.
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);
        let rules = [
            FolderPermissionRule::folder("deny-parent").denying([DriveOperation::Edit]),
            FolderPermissionRule::file("target").allowing([DriveOperation::Edit]),
        ];

        let evaluated = resolve_decision_for_file_target(
            &files_api,
            &target_file("target", &["deny-parent"]),
            DriveOperation::Edit,
            &rules,
        )
        .await
        .unwrap();

        assert_eq!(evaluated.decision.verdict, write_gate::Verdict::Allow);
        assert_eq!(evaluated.source, DecisionSource::FileRule);
    }

    #[tokio::test]
    async fn a_target_with_parents_and_no_file_rule_walks_the_chain_as_before() {
        let server = wiremock::MockServer::start().await;
        let client = client_with_bootstrapped_token(&server).await;
        mount_folder("parent", None).mount(&server).await;
        let files_api = FilesApi::new(&client);
        let rules = [FolderPermissionRule::folder("parent").allowing([DriveOperation::Edit])];

        let evaluated = resolve_decision_for_file_target(
            &files_api,
            &target_file("target", &["parent"]),
            DriveOperation::Edit,
            &rules,
        )
        .await
        .unwrap();

        assert_eq!(evaluated.decision.verdict, write_gate::Verdict::Allow);
        assert_eq!(evaluated.source, DecisionSource::FolderChain);
        assert_eq!(evaluated.resolved_folder_id.as_deref(), Some("parent"));
    }
}