Skip to main content

makeover_webview/
lib.rs

1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet
19//!
20//! The stylesheet half needs no markup of the app's to change: an app that
21//! writes its own markup keeps every line of it and gains the classes, which is
22//! why adopting the generated stylesheet is not a migration.
23//!
24//! Adoption is not a deletion either. A rule loses its depth declarations and
25//! gains a variant selector next to it, so an app's file stays about the same
26//! size. What moves is where depth is defined, not how much CSS exists.
27//!
28//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
29//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
30//!
31//! Some of what phase A emits is not a look but the withdrawal of one. A
32//! renderer that picks its element from the description inherits that element's
33//! user-agent chrome, and [`reset`] is where a primitive says which parts of it
34//! were never asked for.
35//!
36//! # Phase B: the markup, one description at a time
37//!
38//! [`form`] renders [`makeover_layout::Field`], which is the half of phase B
39//! whose description is settled. It emits strings, because both apps
40//! interpolate their fields into larger string-built forms and returning nodes
41//! would rewrite those too. It owns its own escaping, on the reasoning in that
42//! module: a Rust encoder can cover element text and attribute values with one
43//! function, where the apps need four and have to choose correctly at every
44//! call site.
45//!
46//! [`facet`] renders `makeover_layout::Facet`: a dimension a set is narrowed by,
47//! and the one phase-B emitter whose markup an app is not keeping, because the
48//! markup it replaces was two mechanisms rather than one. A tag's selection and
49//! a tag's browse position were separate state on MNW's discover page, which is
50//! why every filter row there carries a tick box *and* a chevron; one gesture
51//! doing both is what lets the second one go.
52//!
53//! [`list`] is the other half: column tracks, the narrowing rules, and the cell
54//! containers a row is made of. It stops at the cell boundary and does not
55//! render what goes inside one, on the reasoning in that module. So phase B is
56//! now the frame around content in both directions, and what an app still owns
57//! is the content itself.
58//!
59//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
60//!
61//! Measured against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a component
62//! list: `.btn`, `.card` and `.tag, .badge` each hand-write the same
63//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
64//!
65//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
66//! not be described as a pure deletion:
67//!
68//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
69//!   [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
70//!   will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
71//!   and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
72//!   where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
73//!   hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
74//!   that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
75//!   answer is there and not here.
76//! - **Badges go flat.** See `token_rules`.
77//!
78//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
79//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
80//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
81//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
82//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
83//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
84//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
85//!
86//! # Interaction states
87//!
88//! [`interactive_rules`] emits four states, in emission order, and the order is
89//! load-bearing: they are all specificity (0,2,0), so disabled beats hover by
90//! coming last and by nothing else. Nothing here reaches for `:not(:disabled)`,
91//! which would raise a selector this crate wraps in its own layer.
92//!
93//! Emitting the states here is what keeps an app from completing the primitive
94//! from outside, by out-specifying a rule it does not own. Those overrides are
95//! also what breaks under cascade layers: an app that declares `@layer` puts
96//! its own rules in a named layer, and unlayered declarations outrank every
97//! named layer regardless of specificity.
98//!
99//! Hover sits inside a capability query. `makeover-touch` answers whether a
100//! fingertip has hover and `makeover-geometry` spells the condition; this crate
101//! asks and does not decide, so no app has to take the hover state back on
102//! touch.
103//!
104//! # The layer contract
105//!
106//! [`stylesheet`] emits into the `makeover` cascade layer ([`CSS_LAYER`], which
107//! lives in `makeover-geometry` because that is the one crate every CSS emitter
108//! in the family already depends on). `makeover-geometry` does the same for
109//! `geometry.css`.
110//!
111//! The cascade resolves origin and importance, then layer, then specificity,
112//! then source order, and **unlayered normal declarations outrank every named
113//! layer**. An unlayered generated file therefore beats every rule an app owns,
114//! regardless of specificity and regardless of loading last. Nothing errors when
115//! that happens: the CSS is valid, the minifier is happy, and buttons and badges
116//! look subtly wrong. The layer belongs here rather than in each app, because an
117//! app cannot fix it from its own stylesheet: the fix is to layer the file it
118//! does not own.
119//!
120//! An app should declare the order once, or the layer's position is decided by
121//! whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:
122//!
123//! ```css
124//! @layer makeover, base, components, responsive;
125//! ```
126//!
127//! [`in_css_layer`] is re-exported for an app that assembles its own stylesheet
128//! from this crate's pieces: rules an app generates from them are as generated
129//! as the ones here, so they belong in the same layer and this crate cannot put
130//! them there on the app's behalf.
131//!
132//! # Suggestions
133//!
134//! `Outcome::Suggestions` carries `Candidate` rather than `Choice`, and a
135//! candidate has no `unavailable`: a suggestion that cannot be picked is a row
136//! a route should not have offered. What it has instead is a `detail`, the line
137//! that tells it from a row reading the same, and it is drawn in
138//! `--content-muted` rather than in the disabled token. A detail orients rather
139//! than refuses, and every other secondary line in this crate reads the same
140//! way. The class is `.form-suggestion-detail`.
141//!
142//! # An interval is one question with two ends
143//!
144//! [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Interval`] emits a `role="group"` named by the
145//! field's label, holding one `<input type="number">` per end.
146//!
147//! - **The group carries the error and the descriptions**, on the split
148//!   [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Radio`] already uses here: what is wrong is
149//!   the answer, and a crossed interval is not the fault of either end.
150//! - **Both boxes take the whole extent.** `min`, `max` and `step` describe the
151//!   axis, so they are written twice. The crossing rule is not emitted, because
152//!   HTML has no attribute for it and the description does not carry it: it
153//!   comes back as an error on the group, like every other refusal.
154//! - **Which end is which is `aria-label` and nothing more.** The description
155//!   states direction structurally, by which member holds which name, and never
156//!   in words. Visible Min and Max captions are a page's own and reach the
157//!   group through [`form::Filling::trailing`].
158//!
159//! [`Value::Between`](makeover_layout::Value::Between) is the second value. A separator inside one string
160//! would make this crate the owner of a delimiter that either end could contain.
161//!
162//! # A number's unit is adjacent text
163//!
164//! HTML has no unit attribute and inventing one would be markup nothing reads,
165//! so `Field::unit` is a `<span>` after the control. It is named in
166//! `aria-describedby` rather than left as decoration, because a number and what
167//! it is measured in are one fact and reading the first without the second is
168//! reading it wrong. What that buys is a unit a consumer can read back rather
169//! than a suffix on a label it would have to parse.
170//!
171//! # A curve this renderer can carry, and one it declines
172//!
173//! A range takes its granularity from the curve (`Field::curve.step()`), every
174//! other kind keeps `Field::step`, and `Curve::Linear` emits a plain range.
175//!
176//! **A constant-ratio curve emits a linear track, and that is the answer, not a
177//! debt.** HTML has no logarithmic range input, so a described screen asking
178//! for one is asking the browser for something it does not have, the same class
179//! of request as [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Date`] on a host with no
180//! calendar. The renderer answers with the nearest control the host really
181//! offers and keeps every fact that survives the translation: the extent, the
182//! granularity, and the value's own units. What does not survive is resolution
183//! at the small end. The value submitted is still a value in the field's own
184//! units, which is what every handler on this path reads.
185//!
186//! The alternatives are worse in the specific way this stack exists to avoid.
187//! Shipping JS that maps thumb position to value puts app code back in the
188//! renderer. Changing what the control submits from a value to a fraction moves
189//! the mapping to whoever reads the form, and a server reading these forms with
190//! its own handlers would take a fraction where a value is expected, silently.
191//!
192//! When this reopens: the day a described screen on the webview path asks for a
193//! non-linear range. The answer then is mapping in `quasi-router`, where one
194//! implementation serves every host, not JS here.
195//!
196//! # A markdown field gets a preview
197//!
198//! A [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Rich`] field is marked
199//! `data-format="markdown"`, and `form::editor_rules` is what spends that
200//! mark. The Write/Preview pair is a segmented control, so it takes the depth,
201//! the focus ring and the chosen state from rules that already exist; the
202//! preview pane is a well, because it stands where the control stood. Both are
203//! gated on the attribute rather than on a class, which is what the attribute is
204//! for. A permission taken and not spent turns every conversion into a
205//! regression.
206//!
207//! **This crate renders no markdown.** The pane arrives empty and is filled by
208//! whatever binds the editor, which is where the host's sanitiser already is. A
209//! converter here would move that guarantee into a crate with no view of the
210//! host's content-security posture.
211//!
212//! # Ranges, ghost text, and an option that cannot be picked
213//!
214//! - `FieldKind::Range` emits `<input type="range">`, and `Field::step` emits
215//!   `step`. The step is emitted only when the description carries one: the
216//!   browser's own default is `step="1"`, which is what a description means by
217//!   saying nothing, and is also what turns a 0-to-1 threshold into a
218//!   two-position control.
219//! - A select with nothing chosen emits a disabled, selected, valueless first
220//!   option carrying `Field::placeholder`. HTML has no placeholder attribute on
221//!   `<select>`; this is the idiom, and `required` keeps working through it
222//!   because the option's value is empty.
223//! - `Choice::unavailable` emits `disabled` plus the reason. Where it goes
224//!   differs by control and the difference is forced: a radio group gets a
225//!   `.form-option-reason` span beside the label, and a `<select>` option has
226//!   room for no element at all, so the reason runs into its text.
227//! - `Choice::detail` takes the same split for the same reason: a
228//!   `.form-option-detail` span in a radio group, run into the text of a
229//!   `<select>`'s option. An option carrying both reads what it is before why it
230//!   cannot be picked.
231//!
232//! # A cell says what it holds
233//!
234//! [`CellPart`] names the four things a cell holds,
235//! and `table_rules` turns them into `.cell-value`, `.cell-tokens`,
236//! `.cell-actions` and `.cell-link`. The value and the link take a colour: a
237//! token carries its own tone and an action is a control rather than text.
238//!
239//! The colour goes on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell`. On the container it
240//! cascades into the parts that are not text, and a control in a cell is painted
241//! as text, which is the drift
242//! [`RowPart::intent`](makeover_layout::RowPart) prevents for list rows.
243//!
244//! [`list::Cell::part`] is `Option<CellPart>` and never `Option<RowPart>`: the
245//! two answer different questions, and only one of them is about a cell.
246//!
247//! # A table narrows itself
248//!
249//! A table a description produced knows its columns at render time, so no rule
250//! can be written per table: it would have to travel with the markup, as a
251//! `<style>` element that needs `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` or in a head an htmx
252//! fragment swap does not carry. `table_rules` lays every table out as flex
253//! rows instead, each column starting at its declared floor and giving up room
254//! by its [`Priority`](makeover_layout::Priority), so the browser narrows a
255//! table at the width its floors add up to. [`list::column_classes`] is what
256//! puts the column's classes on a cell, and every cell's contents go in
257//! [`list::CELL_IN`]. **A header row emitted by a renderer's own code has to do
258//! both too**, or the header and the body disagree about which column just
259//! closed and how wide the rest are.
260//!
261//! `.button` takes the four tones as colour, off `data-tone`, the way the badge
262//! does, so a destructive button has somewhere for its tone to land. A list is
263//! reset rather than left as a bulleted list.
264//!
265//! `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` is not honoured. Hiding a row's actions until
266//! hover hides them from pointer users alone, who are the ones scanning a list
267//! to learn what can be done to a row, and every escape the rule grows
268//! (`focus-within` for the keyboard, a capability gate for a fingertip) is a
269//! report that hiding was wrong for somebody.
270//!
271//! # The depth classes are not controls
272//!
273//! `.raised` is a statement about shape and carries no interactive set, so the
274//! vocabulary has a raised surface that is merely an object. An app that wants
275//! one does not have to take a control class and cancel the control half.
276//!
277//! `.button` is the same depth *and* a control, and takes its states from
278//! `surface_rules`, which is where a state belongs: on the thing that claims
279//! to answer a pointer. `.card` is a raised object, and it answers a pointer
280//! only when the element it is written on is a control, `a`, `button`,
281//! `label`, or anything carrying `data-act`, so one name serves the card
282//! that is read and the card that is pressed.
283//!
284//! # Substitution, three ways
285//!
286//! A theme with no `surface-well` is answered differently by each renderer,
287//! which is why substitution belongs to a renderer and not to the description:
288//!
289//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
290//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
291//!   terminal would quantise the two together.
292//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
293//!   var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
294//!   decides anything.
295
296#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
297
298pub mod chart;
299pub mod facet;
300pub mod figure;
301pub mod form;
302pub mod list;
303pub mod meter;
304pub mod placeholder;
305pub mod reset;
306pub mod vocabulary;
307
308mod table;
309use table::table_rules;
310
311/// A render of every emitter, scraped for the classes it wrote.
312///
313/// Test-only, and the guard behind [`vocabulary::names`]. See the module's own
314/// header for why the check renders rather than reads the source.
315#[cfg(test)]
316mod corpus;
317
318use crate::list::{cell_part_class, part_class};
319use crate::reset::{Chrome, Reset};
320use makeover_geometry::{Density, SizeClass};
321// Re-exported rather than redefined. An app assembling its own stylesheet out
322// of this crate's pieces needs the same layer name, and most such apps depend
323// on this crate and not on `makeover-geometry` directly.
324pub use makeover_geometry::{CSS_LAYER, in_css_layer};
325
326/// This crate's version, as the generated stylesheet reports it.
327///
328/// A consumer whose lockfile still pins an old `makeover-webview` gets a
329/// well-formed sheet with components missing and no error anywhere, so the
330/// emitter has to name itself in what it writes. Read by
331/// `makeover_build::layout_css` through [`stylesheet`].
332pub const VERSION: &str = env!("CARGO_PKG_VERSION");
333use makeover_layout::{
334    Bevel, CellPart, Depth, Fallback, Fill, Flow, Intent, RowPart, Selector, Sort, State, Token,
335    Tone,
336};
337use makeover_touch::Affordance;
338use std::fmt::Write as _;
339
340/// How the emitted CSS and markup are shaped, and the copy they carry.
341///
342/// Built with [`Emit::new`] and its setters. `#[non_exhaustive]`, so a new
343/// knob is not a breaking change for anyone who configures one.
344#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
345#[non_exhaustive]
346pub struct Emit {
347    /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
348    ///
349    /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: this crate names no sizes of its
350    /// own.
351    pub border_width: &'static str,
352    /// Focus ring thickness, as a CSS length.
353    ///
354    /// Separate from [`border_width`](Self::border_width), and never derived
355    /// from it: a bevel and a focus indicator answer different questions, and
356    /// only one of them has to be noticed from across a desk.
357    ///
358    /// The default, 2px, is what every consumer had chosen for its own ring.
359    pub focus_width: &'static str,
360    /// The smallest a pointer target may be drawn, as a CSS length.
361    ///
362    /// A value for [`border_width`](Self::border_width)'s reason: a floor is a
363    /// size, and this crate names no sizes of its own.
364    ///
365    /// The default is WCAG 2.2's target minimum. It is an absolute rather than
366    /// a step off the geometry base, and that is deliberate on two counts: a
367    /// floor that scales with the reader's root size is not a floor, and the
368    /// touch density opens the gaps *between* targets rather than licensing a
369    /// smaller one for a pointer.
370    pub target_min: &'static str,
371    /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
372    pub class_prefix: &'static str,
373    /// What marks a compulsory field, appended to its label.
374    ///
375    /// `makeover-tui`'s `PieceStyle::required_marker` and
376    /// `makeover-immediate`'s `FieldStyle::required_marker`, said here for the
377    /// third renderer, with their default. A knob for their reason: it is the
378    /// one piece of *copy* this crate emits, and copy is not a renderer's
379    /// call.
380
381    ///
382    /// # Why it is hidden from the accessibility tree here and nowhere else
383    ///
384    /// The control already carries `required`, which a screen reader
385    /// announces. A marker read out beside it is the same fact twice, so the
386    /// span is `aria-hidden`. The other two renderers have no such attribute
387    /// to lean on, which is why the marker is part of the label string there
388    /// and an element here.
389    pub required_marker: &'static str,
390    /// The accessible name's lead on a facet value's exclude button, before
391    /// the value's own label: "Exclude Drums". Copy, for
392    /// [`required_marker`](Self::required_marker)'s reason.
393    pub exclude_label: &'static str,
394    /// The markdown editor's two modes, as the segments say them.
395    pub write_label: &'static str,
396    /// See [`write_label`](Self::write_label).
397    pub preview_label: &'static str,
398    /// The accessible names of an interval's two boxes.
399    pub lower_label: &'static str,
400    /// See [`lower_label`](Self::lower_label).
401    pub upper_label: &'static str,
402}
403
404impl Emit {
405    /// The defaults: the measured widths above, no prefix, and English copy.
406    #[must_use]
407    pub const fn new() -> Self {
408        Self {
409            border_width: "1px",
410            focus_width: "2px",
411            target_min: "24px",
412            class_prefix: "",
413            required_marker: "*",
414            exclude_label: "Exclude",
415            write_label: "Write",
416            preview_label: "Preview",
417            lower_label: "lower",
418            upper_label: "upper",
419        }
420    }
421}
422
423/// One setter per field, named after it, for building an [`Emit`] outside this
424/// crate: `Emit::new().class_prefix("mk-")`.
425macro_rules! setters {
426    ($($field:ident),* $(,)?) => {
427        impl Emit {
428            $(
429                #[doc = concat!("Set [`", stringify!($field), "`](Self::", stringify!($field), ").")]
430                #[must_use]
431                pub const fn $field(mut self, value: &'static str) -> Self {
432                    self.$field = value;
433                    self
434                }
435            )*
436        }
437    };
438}
439
440setters!(
441    border_width,
442    focus_width,
443    target_min,
444    class_prefix,
445    required_marker,
446    exclude_label,
447    write_label,
448    preview_label,
449    lower_label,
450    upper_label,
451);
452
453impl Default for Emit {
454    fn default() -> Self {
455        Self::new()
456    }
457}
458
459/// A string as CSS escapes, for a `content` value.
460///
461/// `\u{25B2}` becomes `\25B2`. Emitted escaped rather than literally so the
462/// stylesheet is ASCII whatever the description spells: a `content` string is
463/// read by whatever encoding the consumer serves the file as, and a caret that
464/// depends on that is a caret that works on one machine.
465///
466/// Terminated by the closing quote at every site here. A CSS hex escape takes
467/// up to six digits and ends at the first character that cannot be one, so an
468/// escape followed by more text would need a space that these do not.
469fn css_escape(text: &str) -> String {
470    text.chars().fold(String::new(), |mut out, c| {
471        let _ = write!(out, "\\{:X}", c as u32);
472        out
473    })
474}
475
476/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
477#[must_use]
478pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
479    match bevel {
480        Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
481        Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
482        Bevel::RaisedOpen => "--bevel-raised-open",
483        // An edge added to the description since this renderer was last
484        // built. The raised edge rather than no edge: a control with no
485        // box-shadow reads as flat, which is a different claim, where a
486        // closed edge is at worst the same shape drawn one run too many.
487        _ => "--bevel-raised",
488    }
489}
490
491/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
492/// the intent may be absent.
493///
494/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
495/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
496#[must_use]
497pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
498    match fill {
499        Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
500        other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
501    }
502}
503
504/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
505///
506/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
507/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
508/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
509/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
510#[must_use]
511pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
512    let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
513    let w = opts.border_width;
514    // The shaded run's vertical offset is what puts it on the bottom edge. At
515    // zero it lands on the right edge alone, which is the open bevel: three
516    // sides drawn and the fourth left for the surface below to continue
517    // through. Same two shadows either way, so nothing downstream has to know
518    // which it got.
519    // The sign belongs to the value rather than to the template: writing
520    // `-{down}` against a zero emits `-0`, which is a length no stylesheet
521    // should carry even where a parser accepts it.
522    let down = if bevel.draws_bottom() {
523        format!("-{w}")
524    } else {
525        "0".to_string()
526    };
527    format!(
528        "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} {down} 0 var(--{})",
529        top_left.token(),
530        bottom_right.token()
531    )
532}
533
534/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
535///
536/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
537/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
538/// without the fill reads the property directly.
539#[must_use]
540pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
541    let mut css = String::new();
542    for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset, Bevel::RaisedOpen] {
543        let _ = writeln!(
544            css,
545            "    {}: {};",
546            bevel_var(bevel),
547            bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
548        );
549    }
550    css.push_str(ELEVATION_PROPERTY);
551    css
552}
553
554/// The cast shadow of a surface that floats over the page.
555///
556/// Composed here for the reason the bevel pair is: `makeover` derives the tone,
557/// this crate owns the geometry, and neither has to know the other's numbers.
558///
559/// **Only for a surface that overlays the page.** A menu, a toast, a popover, a
560/// dropdown. A surface *in* the page takes `.raised` and its bevel, and a rule
561/// that reaches for this on a card or a plate has renamed a literal rather than
562/// replaced it.
563///
564/// Two lengths rather than one, because a single blur reads as a smudge at
565/// plate size and as a halo at menu size. The offset is small and downward: a
566/// Platinum-era menu sits just off the page rather than hovering above it.
567const ELEVATION_PROPERTY: &str =
568    "    --elevation-overlay: 0 2px 4px var(--elevation), 0 8px 24px var(--elevation);\n";
569
570/// The class name for a depth.
571#[must_use]
572pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
573    let name = match depth {
574        Depth::Flat => return None,
575        Depth::Raised => "raised",
576        Depth::Well => "well",
577        Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
578        // A depth added to the description since this renderer was last
579        // built. No class, on the same footing as Flat: emitting a name
580        // whose rule body we cannot write would put a class in the markup
581        // that the stylesheet never defines.
582        _ => return None,
583    };
584    Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
585}
586
587/// A prefixed class name.
588///
589/// Public, for the renderers that emit markup this crate does not. A screen
590/// renderer writing `class="row"` has to prefix it the way the stylesheet half
591/// does, or a prefixed app gets rules matching everything except the elements
592/// that renderer wrote, and the failure is invisible: the CSS stays valid and
593/// one element is unstyled. Call this rather than copying it.
594#[must_use]
595pub fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
596    let mut out = String::with_capacity(opts.class_prefix.len() + name.len());
597    push_class(&mut out, name, opts);
598    out
599}
600
601/// A prefixed class name, written into a buffer the caller already has.
602///
603/// The form the emitters use, and the reason it exists is [`escape_into`]'s:
604/// putting every class on every element through a `format!` allocates even in
605/// the default case, where the prefix is empty and the answer is the argument.
606/// A described table row carries roughly eighty transient allocations that way,
607/// and this and the escaper are most of them.
608///
609/// [`class`] stays for callers holding a name rather than a buffer.
610///
611/// [`escape_into`]: crate::form::escape_into
612pub fn push_class(out: &mut String, name: &str, opts: &Emit) {
613    out.push_str(opts.class_prefix);
614    out.push_str(name);
615}
616
617/// The attribute an element's custom properties ride in, instead of `style`.
618///
619/// A number this crate hands the stylesheet, a bar's value and its axis, a
620/// facet's depth, a meter's fill, is a custom property the rules divide or
621/// multiply. A `style-src` without `'unsafe-inline'` refuses every style
622/// attribute, so a page under that policy would draw every chart flat from
623/// `style="--value: 4210"`. The same text in this
624/// attribute is data a policy does not police, and the host's script sets each
625/// property through the CSSOM, which the policy allows: [`VARS_JS`].
626///
627/// The value is `--name: value` pairs separated by `;`, the declaration syntax
628/// the `style` attribute already had, so the numbers still reach the markup as
629/// themselves. That is the property the residual seam needs: see the
630/// [`chart`] module header.
631///
632/// Only custom properties. A script that applied any declaration from markup
633/// would hand the policy's refusal straight back.
634pub const VARS_ATTR: &str = "data-vars";
635
636/// The script that applies [`VARS_ATTR`], for a host to serve beside its other
637/// assets.
638///
639/// Without it every number the rules read from that attribute is missing: bars
640/// and charts flat, tree rows unindented, a split screen at even halves. Serve
641/// it as a classic script in the head, not deferred, so its observer is
642/// running before the parser reaches the body and the first paint already has
643/// every property.
644///
645/// ```no_run
646/// # fn main() -> std::io::Result<()> {
647/// std::fs::write("static/vars.js", makeover_webview::VARS_JS)?;
648/// # Ok(())
649/// # }
650/// ```
651pub const VARS_JS: &str = include_str!("vars.js");
652
653/// The class an option of a selector carries, which is what the rules key off.
654///
655/// Named for the option and not for the group: `selector_rules` styles the
656/// thing that gets picked, so `Selector::Tabs` is `tab` and not `tabs`. The
657/// distinction is not pedantry. quasi-webview spelled these `tabs`, `segmented`
658/// and `option`, put `toggle` on the wrapping element rather than on the
659/// buttons inside it, and every described selector in that renderer came out
660/// with no depth, no focus ring and no chosen state, while the toggle group got
661/// a bevel meant for its buttons.
662///
663/// The chosen option additionally carries `chosen`, the same way a latched chip
664/// carries `latched`. That name is this crate's too; there is no reason for a
665/// caller to spell it, and `selector_rules` is where it is written down.
666#[must_use]
667pub fn option_class(selector: Selector) -> &'static str {
668    match selector {
669        Selector::Tabs => "tab",
670        Selector::Segmented => "segment",
671        Selector::Toggle => "toggle",
672        // A selector this crate has not learned draws as tabs, the plainest
673        // of the three, rather than as nothing.
674        _ => "tab",
675    }
676}
677
678/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
679///
680/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
681/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
682/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
683/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
684///
685/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
686/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both would silently drop the fill for exactly
687/// that case. Independent does not
688/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
689/// disagree about what the region is.
690#[must_use]
691pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
692    let mut css = String::new();
693    if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
694        let _ = writeln!(css, "    background: {};", fill_var(fill));
695    }
696    if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
697        let _ = writeln!(css, "    box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
698    }
699    css
700}
701
702/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
703/// nothing.
704#[must_use]
705pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
706    let body = depth_declarations(depth);
707    if body.is_empty() {
708        return String::new();
709    }
710    format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
711}
712
713/// The media condition a hover rule has to sit inside, or `None` if hover is
714/// unconditional.
715///
716/// Two crates answer this and neither answer is made here. `makeover-touch`
717/// owns *whether* hover exists at a density, and `makeover-geometry` owns how
718/// that capability is spelled as a media condition. Asking both is what stops
719/// this renderer minting a third opinion, which is what all three apps did:
720/// goingson sniffed the user agent, Balanced Breakfast used `(hover: none)`
721/// alone, and the MNW server had no gate at all.
722///
723/// [`SizeClass`] is required by [`Affordance::available`] and ignored by this
724/// member, which reports as much through `reads_size`. Passing Compact is not
725/// a claim about width; the test below pins that every class agrees.
726pub(crate) fn hover_condition() -> Option<&'static str> {
727    if Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact) {
728        // A fingertip grew a hover state. Nothing to gate, and this renderer
729        // should not invent a reason to gate anyway.
730        None
731    } else {
732        Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition())
733    }
734}
735
736/// Put a rule inside a media query, or leave it alone.
737pub(crate) fn gated(condition: Option<&str>, rule: &str) -> String {
738    let Some(condition) = condition else {
739        return rule.to_string();
740    };
741    let mut css = format!("@media {condition} {{\n");
742    for line in rule.lines() {
743        // Blank lines stay blank. Indenting one leaves trailing whitespace,
744        // which is the sort of thing a formatter later reverts and calls a diff.
745        if line.is_empty() {
746            css.push('\n');
747        } else {
748            let _ = writeln!(css, "    {line}");
749        }
750    }
751    css.push_str("}\n");
752    css
753}
754
755/// The keyboard focus ring, placed by the depth it lands on.
756///
757/// This is the webview's **focus ring** and nothing more. **Reach** and
758/// **focus** are both the browser's, the document decides what is reachable
759/// and `:focus-visible` decides which reached thing wears the ring, and no
760/// description states either. The three terms are defined once in
761/// `makeover_layout`'s crate header, "Reach, focus and the focus ring".
762///
763/// One ring for the whole system, because a focus ring's job is to be
764/// recognised and three apps having three of them is the failure. What varies
765/// is where it sits, and that comes off [`Depth`] rather than off a per-
766/// component choice: a well takes the ring inside its own edge, and anything
767/// standing proud of the page takes it outside.
768///
769/// `outline` rather than the composed `box-shadow` the invalid-field ring at
770/// `field_rules` uses, and deliberately the one place the two rings are built
771/// differently. A `box-shadow` ring has to restate the bevel beside it, because
772/// `box-shadow` is not additive and a lone ring silently drops the well out
773/// from under the element. That restatement is a second copy of the depth,
774/// living in a different function from the first, and it is exactly the
775/// duplication `Depth` exists to prevent. `outline` occupies its own property,
776/// so the bevel survives untouched and there is nothing to keep in agreement.
777/// They render the same: both are a flush ring one border-width wide.
778#[must_use]
779pub fn focus_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
780    let w = opts.focus_width;
781    // Same magnitude either way, and only the sign comes off the depth. Both
782    // values are what the consumers had already converged on independently:
783    // 2px out is what all three wrote, and 2px in is the MNW server's own
784    // answer for the one inset ring it had.
785    let offset = match depth.bevel() {
786        // Inside the well, clear of its edge rather than painted over it.
787        Some(Bevel::Inset) => format!("calc(-1 * {w})"),
788        // Raised, or no edge at all. Outside, standing off by its own width.
789        _ => w.to_string(),
790    };
791    // The token by name. It is `makeover`'s, derived from the action colour,
792    // and reaching it through a description member was a second path to the
793    // same variable for as long as one existed.
794    format!(
795        ".{selector}:focus-visible {{\n    outline: {w} solid var(--focus-ring);\n    outline-offset: {offset};\n}}\n"
796    )
797}
798
799/// A rest depth said out loud on both axes, for a rule that has to beat the
800/// states above it.
801///
802/// [`depth_declarations`] states an axis only when the depth has something to
803/// say about it, which is right for a rest rule: a [`Depth::Flat`] region
804/// inherits what it sits on, and asserting `background: none` there would be
805/// the difference between level-with and painted-transparent. It is wrong for
806/// a rule whose whole job is to take a state back. An axis left unstated is an
807/// axis the state above keeps, so `Flat` re-asserted nothing at all and a
808/// disabled control kept whatever hover had given it.
809///
810/// So the axes the depth is silent on are withdrawn rather than skipped, and
811/// the withdrawal is spelled by [`reset`] rather than here, so a disabled
812/// control and a flat one say the same words. Reaches further than the fill:
813/// [`Depth::Sunken`] and [`Depth::Overlay`] have no bevel either, and the
814/// pressed rule above hands out an inset one.
815fn rest_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
816    let mut css = String::new();
817    match depth.fill() {
818        Some(fill) => {
819            let _ = writeln!(css, "    background: {};", fill_var(fill));
820        }
821        None => css.push_str(&Reset::NOTHING.and(Chrome::Fill).declarations()),
822    }
823    match depth.bevel() {
824        Some(bevel) => {
825            let _ = writeln!(css, "    box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
826        }
827        None => css.push_str(&Reset::NOTHING.and(Chrome::Shadow).declarations()),
828    }
829    css
830}
831
832/// Present, visible, and not answering.
833///
834/// Matches the ARIA attribute as well as the pseudo-class, because `:disabled`
835/// only matches form elements and half the things this crate emits are not
836/// one: a `div` carrying `.chip` or `.tab` can never be `:disabled`. Keying on
837/// the accessible state is the pattern `field_rules` already establishes for
838/// `aria-invalid`, on the reasoning that one fact read by both the styling and
839/// the accessibility tree cannot drift from itself.
840///
841/// The rest depth is re-asserted rather than assumed, because this rule has to
842/// beat the hover and pressed rules above it. It does that on source order at
843/// equal specificity, not by out-specifying them: every rule this function's
844/// caller emits is (0,2,0), and adding a `:not(:disabled)` anywhere would raise
845/// one of them and have to be unpicked when this output moves inside its own
846/// cascade layer.
847///
848/// Re-asserted on **both** axes, through `rest_declarations`.
849/// `depth_declarations` alone is empty for [`Depth::Flat`], so a flat control
850/// would win the contest with nothing to say and keep the hover surface
851/// underneath a control that had stopped answering.
852#[must_use]
853pub fn disabled_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
854    format!(
855        ".{selector}:disabled,\n.{selector}[aria-disabled=\"true\"] {{\n{}    color: var(--{});\n    cursor: not-allowed;\n}}\n",
856        rest_declarations(depth),
857        State::Disabled.token()
858    )
859}
860
861/// Every state a selector that answers a click implies: hover, pressed, focus
862/// and disabled, in that order.
863///
864/// Order is the whole cascade mechanism here. All four selectors are
865/// specificity (0,2,0), so disabled wins over hover and pressed by coming last
866/// and by nothing else.
867///
868/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
869/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
870/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
871/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
872/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
873/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
874///
875/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
876/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
877/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
878/// consumed until now. What it *is* gated on is capability, via
879/// `hover_condition`. Before that gate existed the apps each wrote their own:
880/// goingson's section 60 exists solely to take back the hover state this
881/// function had just handed it, by out-specifying a rule it does not own.
882///
883/// `depth` is the selector's **rest** depth, used to place the focus ring and
884/// to restore the surface under a disabled control. The pressed rule keeps
885/// inverting from [`Depth::Raised`] regardless: a tab's unchosen depth is
886/// [`Depth::Sunken`], and `Sunken.pressed()` is `Sunken`, so deriving the press
887/// from the rest depth would leave a tab with no press at all.
888#[must_use]
889pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
890    let mut css = gated(
891        hover_condition(),
892        &format!(".{selector}:hover {{\n    background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n"),
893    );
894    css.push_str(&depth_rule(
895        &format!("{selector}:active"),
896        Depth::Raised.pressed(),
897    ));
898    css.push_str(&focus_rule(selector, depth, opts));
899    css.push_str(&disabled_rule(selector, depth));
900    css
901}
902
903/// The compound a card's interactive states are written against: the class
904/// on an element that is itself a control.
905///
906/// `label` for a card wrapping a choice, `[data-act]` for an act a renderer
907/// drew on some other element. Without the class prefix, the way every
908/// selector handed to [`interactive_rules`] is.
909#[must_use]
910pub fn pressable_card(card: &str) -> String {
911    format!("{card}:is(a, button, label, [data-act])")
912}
913
914/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
915///
916/// A depth and nothing else. `.raised` says a surface sits on what is behind
917/// it, which is a statement about the shape and not about what happens when a
918/// pointer arrives, so it emits no hover, press, focus or disabled rule. The
919/// named surfaces are where interaction lives: `.button`, and `.card` written
920/// on a control, get their states from `surface_rules`.
921///
922/// Giving this class the interactive set leaves the vocabulary with no raised
923/// surface that is merely an object, so a consumer that needs one has to take a
924/// control class and cancel half of it.
925#[must_use]
926pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
927    let mut css = String::new();
928    for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
929        let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
930            continue;
931        };
932        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
933    }
934    css
935}
936
937/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
938///
939/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
940/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
941/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
942/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
943/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
944/// drifting apart again.
945///
946/// A card's states hang off [`pressable_card`] rather than the bare class. A
947/// card is a raised object that answers a pointer only when it is written on a
948/// control, which is what lets one name cover both: a store tile that is one
949/// link, a tier picker that is a label round a radio, and a use-case card that
950/// does nothing and so has no hover to cancel.
951fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
952    let mut css = String::new();
953    let button = class("button", opts);
954    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&button, Depth::Raised));
955    css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&button, Depth::Raised, opts));
956
957    let card = class("card", opts);
958    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&card, Depth::Raised));
959    css.push_str(&interactive_rules(
960        &pressable_card(&card),
961        Depth::Raised,
962        opts,
963    ));
964
965    let field = class("field", opts);
966    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
967
968    // A field takes focus and refuses input like everything else here, and got
969    // neither until now, which is why all three apps hand-write a focus ring
970    // for it and no two of them match. No hover or pressed: a text field does
971    // not light up under the pointer and does not invert when clicked, so the
972    // two states `interactive_rules` would add are the two it does not have.
973    css.push_str(&focus_rule(&field, Depth::Well, opts));
974    css.push_str(&disabled_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
975
976    // A file field's own button is a button. `::file-selector-button` is the
977    // one part of an `<input type="file">` a stylesheet reaches, and without a
978    // rule the platform's grey control sits inside a well drawn in the theme's.
979    // Raised, with the hover and the press a button has; no focus ring, because
980    // the focus belongs to the input the pseudo-element is part of, and the
981    // field's own ring already draws it.
982    let chooser = format!("{field}::file-selector-button");
983    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chooser, Depth::Raised));
984    let _ = writeln!(
985        css,
986        ".{chooser} {{\n    border: none;\n    color: inherit;\n    font: inherit;\n    padding: var(--gap-bound) var(--gap-peer);\n    margin-inline-end: var(--gap-peer);\n    cursor: pointer;\n}}"
987    );
988    css.push_str(&gated(
989        hover_condition(),
990        &format!(".{chooser}:hover {{\n    background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n"),
991    ));
992    css.push_str(&depth_rule(
993        &format!("{chooser}:active"),
994        Depth::Raised.pressed(),
995    ));
996
997    // Keyed on the ARIA attribute rather than on a class, so the visual state
998    // and the accessible state cannot drift apart: there is one fact and both
999    // read it. goingson already drove its invalid styling this way and was
1000    // right to; the `.invalid` class this emitted before 0.5.0 was a second
1001    // place to forget.
1002    //
1003    // The ring composes *after* the bevel rather than replacing it. box-shadow
1004    // is not additive, so a lone ring silently dropped the well out from under
1005    // an invalid field. Flat and unlit: this edge is saying "wrong", and
1006    // lighting one side would have it say "raised" at the same time.
1007    let _ = writeln!(
1008        css,
1009        ".{field}[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {{\n    box-shadow: var({}), 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
1010        bevel_var(Bevel::Inset),
1011        opts.border_width
1012    );
1013
1014    // The default-button ring, on the one control that commits
1015    // (`makeover_layout::Act::commits`, wiki `explicit-commit-affordance`).
1016    // A flush frame twice the border width, composed after the bevel for the
1017    // invalid ring's reason, and outside the element, so the focus outline,
1018    // which stands off by its own width, lands beside it rather than over it.
1019    // Pressed keeps the ring and inverts only the bevel. Disabled drops the
1020    // ring and the weight together: the ring says "this is what Return does",
1021    // and a control Return cannot reach is not the default. goingson's bulk
1022    // bars are the site: Complete and Delete stand disabled until a row is
1023    // ticked, and ringed they read as the strongest controls on a page with
1024    // nothing selected.
1025    //
1026    // An attribute rather than a class, for `data-tone`'s reason: it is a fact
1027    // about the act, and a renderer writes it beside the tone.
1028    let ring = format!("0 0 0 calc(2 * {})", opts.border_width);
1029    let _ = writeln!(
1030        css,
1031        ".{button}[data-commits] {{\n    box-shadow: var({}), {ring} var(--border-strong);\n    font-weight: bold;\n}}",
1032        bevel_var(Bevel::Raised)
1033    );
1034    let _ = writeln!(
1035        css,
1036        ".{button}[data-commits]:active {{\n    box-shadow: var({}), {ring} var(--border-strong);\n}}",
1037        bevel_var(Bevel::Inset)
1038    );
1039    let _ = writeln!(
1040        css,
1041        ".{button}[data-commits]:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled=\"true\"]) {{\n    box-shadow: var({});\n    font-weight: inherit;\n}}",
1042        bevel_var(Bevel::Raised)
1043    );
1044
1045    // The act the screen is for (`makeover_layout::Act::leading`).
1046    //
1047    // **Leading fills and committing outlines**, which is what lets a control
1048    // wear both. The ring above is a frame outside the bevel and this is the
1049    // ground inside it, so the two compose rather than compete: a form that is
1050    // the screen's own work draws a filled button with the default ring round
1051    // it, and a sub-form's Add keeps the ring alone.
1052    //
1053    // `--content-on-action` rather than a hand-picked ink. The theme derives it
1054    // with `readable_on(action)`, so a theme whose action hue is pale gets dark
1055    // text without this file knowing which themes those are.
1056    //
1057    // The bevel stays. A leading control is still a button, and dropping its
1058    // raise to signal importance would make the one control a reader most needs
1059    // to press the one that least looks pressable.
1060    // `:not([data-tone])` is load-bearing, and a render caught it missing.
1061    // A toned control already says what pressing it means, and that outranks
1062    // how badly the screen wants it pressed, the rule `makeover-tui` states
1063    // and this file did not. Without the guard, goingson's compose drew Queue
1064    // with the Success tone's pale ground under `--content-on-action`'s near
1065    // white ink, which is a label nobody can read.
1066    //
1067    // The tone keeps the control; `leading` adds nothing to it. That is a
1068    // deliberate loss: a screen whose primary act is destructive or toned has
1069    // to lead by order and by what the tone already says.
1070    let _ = writeln!(
1071        css,
1072        ".{button}[data-leading]:not([data-tone]) {{\n    background: var(--action);\n    color: var(--content-on-action);\n}}"
1073    );
1074    // Hover keeps the derived pair, so the fill does not fall back to the
1075    // ordinary button's ground mid-hover and leave `--content-on-action`
1076    // stranded on a surface it was never measured against.
1077    //
1078    // Gated through `hover_condition` like every other hover rule here: whether
1079    // a hover state exists at a density is `makeover-touch`'s to answer, and a
1080    // rule written outside the gate is this renderer inventing a second answer.
1081    // The vocabulary test catches exactly that, and caught this.
1082    css.push_str(&gated(
1083        hover_condition(),
1084        &format!(
1085            ".{button}[data-leading]:not([data-tone]):hover {{\n    background: var(--action-hover);\n    color: var(--content-on-action);\n}}\n"
1086        ),
1087    ));
1088    // Disabled drops to the muted ink on the ordinary button ground: a filled
1089    // control that cannot be pressed still reads as the thing to press, which
1090    // is the one thing the fill must not say when it cannot be pressed.
1091    //
1092    // Through `fill_var` rather than naming the token, so this follows the
1093    // ordinary button if the raised fill is ever re-pointed.
1094    let _ = writeln!(
1095        css,
1096        ".{button}[data-leading]:not([data-tone]):is(:disabled, [aria-disabled=\"true\"]) {{\n    background: {};\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}",
1097        fill_var(Fill::Raised)
1098    );
1099    css
1100}
1101
1102/// Badges and chips.
1103///
1104/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
1105/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
1106/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
1107/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
1108/// decide which of the two it always was.
1109///
1110/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
1111/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
1112/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
1113/// Text that goes somewhere.
1114///
1115/// The one inline control. A table cell carries `cell-link` instead, which
1116/// reads as its row's title rather than as a link; this is the same thing
1117/// outside a table, which is what a described run holds when a sentence
1118/// contains a link.
1119///
1120/// Colour and underline only. Whether a link is inline in a sentence or sitting
1121/// on its own line is the app's layout, and how much room it takes is
1122/// `makeover-geometry`'s. What is here is the pair of signals that say "this
1123/// goes somewhere" and nothing that says where it sits.
1124///
1125/// The visited arm is deliberately absent. A link inside an app points at the
1126/// app's own screens, which the user is expected to have been to, so painting
1127/// them differently marks almost everything and distinguishes nothing.
1128fn link_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1129    let mut css = String::new();
1130    let link = class("link", opts);
1131
1132    let _ = writeln!(
1133        css,
1134        ".{link} {{\n    color: var(--action);\n    \
1135         text-decoration: underline;\n}}"
1136    );
1137    // The pointer-target floor, and the scope is the whole of the design in it.
1138    //
1139    // A bare `.link` is its own line box, 21px at the body size, under the 24
1140    // that `makeover_geometry::TARGET_LEAST` names. Applied to every `.link`
1141    // that floor would reach an anchor set in running prose, where growing the
1142    // box sets the leading of the paragraph around it: the fix would cost more
1143    // than the defect. So it is scoped to a link laid out as a piece rather
1144    // than set in text, which in the emitted markup is one inside a run or a
1145    // cell, a footer strip, a row of places, a table cell.
1146    //
1147    // `min-block-size` rather than padding: padding adds to the line box and
1148    // grows whatever holds the link, where a minimum lets the anchor take room
1149    // its container usually already has. `inline-flex` is what makes the
1150    // minimum apply to an inline element at all, and `align-items: center`
1151    // keeps the text on the box's centre line rather than its top.
1152    let run = class("run", opts);
1153    let cell = class("cell", opts);
1154    let least = makeover_geometry::TARGET_LEAST.token();
1155    let _ = writeln!(
1156        css,
1157        ".{run} .{link},\n.{cell} .{link} {{\n    display: inline-flex;\n    \
1158         align-items: center;\n    min-block-size: var(--{least});\n}}"
1159    );
1160    // The hover step is the same one every other control takes, and it is a
1161    // colour rather than a surface: a link has no box to raise.
1162    css.push_str(&gated(
1163        hover_condition(),
1164        &format!(".{link}:hover {{\n    color: var(--action-hover);\n}}\n"),
1165    ));
1166    // The one ring, placed as on anything standing level with the page.
1167    css.push_str(&focus_rule(&link, Depth::Flat, opts));
1168    // A link is often a `<button>` rather than an `<a>`: a renderer picks the
1169    // element from the method, so a link that writes is a button that has to
1170    // stop looking like one. What that costs is named in [`reset`].
1171    css.push_str(&Reset::TEXT_BUTTON.rule(&format!("button.{link}")));
1172    css
1173}
1174
1175fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1176    let mut css = String::new();
1177
1178    // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
1179    // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
1180    let badge = class("badge", opts);
1181    // `content-muted` literally, not `Tone::Neutral.token()`. What makes a
1182    // badge quiet is `Token::Badge` answering no click, which this crate holds
1183    // and `Tone` genuinely does not know. Routing it through Neutral put the
1184    // claim where the evidence was not, and the bill arrived on the figure
1185    // value: it took the same muting from the same call and read as its own
1186    // caption. Neutral answers `content`.
1187    //
1188    // A badge is a chip, wiki `table-model`: an opaque fill inside an edge, in
1189    // the theme's own ink at normal weight. Coloured text was never ratified
1190    // and measured 1.34:1 on goingson's warning; muted text 2.78:1 on
1191    // solarized-dark. So the ink is `content` and what says which kind of
1192    // token it is moves to the fill and the edge: the table's raised ground for
1193    // a neutral chip, makeover's `*-surface` for a status, edged in its tone.
1194    // Still no bevel: a label with a raised edge says it can be pressed.
1195    let bw = opts.border_width;
1196    let _ = writeln!(
1197        css,
1198        ".{badge} {{\n    display: inline-flex;\n    align-items: center;\n    \
1199         padding: 0 var(--step-snug);\n    border: {bw} solid var(--border);\n    \
1200         border-radius: var(--radius-fine);\n    background: var(--surface-raised);\n    \
1201         color: var(--content);\n    font-weight: normal;\n}}"
1202    );
1203    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1204        let _ = writeln!(
1205            css,
1206            ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    background: var(--{0}-surface);\n    \
1207             border-color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1208            tone.token()
1209        );
1210    }
1211
1212    // A button carries the four tones a badge does. It had none, on the reading
1213    // that a control's colour is its surface rather than its text, and that
1214    // reading has one hole big enough to matter: the button that destroys
1215    // something. Every consumer had written that rule itself, and a description
1216    // that says `Tone::Danger` on an act had nowhere for it to land.
1217    //
1218    // A fill and not the text, matching the badge exactly. Coloured text is
1219    // the shape wiki `table-model` ruled out for status text, and
1220    // `{tone}-surface`'s own derivation comment says why: the tone colours are
1221    // fills, and a fill used as
1222    // ink measures 3.36:1 for danger and 1.84:1 for success on goingson's
1223    // theme. Both are under the 4.5:1 floor, and success is under it by more
1224    // than the floor itself.
1225    //
1226    // It read as ratified for longer than it was because goingson set
1227    // `color` on `.button` in a later layer, so no described tone ever reached
1228    // a button and nobody saw the colour it would have drawn.
1229    //
1230    // The earlier note here said a red surface belongs to an app's own layer.
1231    // That argument was against a *saturated* fill, and it still holds: this is
1232    // the ground with 12 percent of the tone in it, which is the same tint a
1233    // status chip carries and is not something an app would draw over.
1234    //
1235    // The fill and NOT the edge, which is where this differs from the badge.
1236    // A badge's border is makeover's, so the badge tones it. A button's is the
1237    // app's: goingson writes `border: ... solid var(--border)` on `.button` in
1238    // a later layer, and a shorthand cancels a generated `border-color` the
1239    // same way its `color` cancelled the tone for months. goingson's own drift
1240    // check caught it on the first build. An edge an app silently overrides is
1241    // worse than no edge, so the tint carries the tone alone.
1242    let button = class("button", opts);
1243    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1244        let _ = writeln!(
1245            css,
1246            ".{button}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    background: var(--{0}-surface);\n}}",
1247            tone.token()
1248        );
1249        // The pointer answer, at the specificity the tone rule just took. The
1250        // plain `.button:hover` is (0,2,0) and sits earlier in this sheet, so
1251        // without this a toned button is the one control on the screen that
1252        // does not move under a pointer.
1253        //
1254        // The fallback is for the version skew, and it is not decoration: the
1255        // hover tint is a `makeover` 3.8 token and this sheet is emitted from a
1256        // crate an app can upgrade on its own. An unresolved custom property
1257        // makes the whole declaration invalid at computed-value time rather
1258        // than dropping to the cascade, so without it a toned button on an
1259        // older theme would hover to `transparent`.
1260        css.push_str(&gated(
1261            hover_condition(),
1262            &format!(
1263                ".{button}[data-tone=\"{0}\"]:hover {{\n    background: \
1264                 var(--{0}-surface-hover, var(--hover-surface));\n}}\n",
1265                tone.token()
1266            ),
1267        ));
1268    }
1269
1270    // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
1271    // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
1272    // markup and waits for phase B.
1273    let chip = class("chip", opts);
1274    let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
1275
1276    // The pointer floor, and the one number in this file that does not scale.
1277    // A chip drawn from its padding alone came out 23px at every width and
1278    // every density in goingson: 36 of one ui-fuzz run's 51 target findings
1279    // were this single rule. The length arrives from the caller, the way every
1280    // other length in this crate does, see `Emit::target_min` for why the
1281    // floor is an absolute rather than a `--step-*`.
1282    //
1283    // A floor and not a height: a chip with two lines of text or a larger root
1284    // size still grows. `.chip` is already `inline-flex` with its items
1285    // centred, from quasi-webview's box rules, so the extra block size opens
1286    // around the label rather than under it. `.chip.latched` takes it through
1287    // the same class; `.badge` is a separate class and deliberately does not,
1288    // because a badge is a label and never a target.
1289    let _ = writeln!(
1290        css,
1291        ".{chip} {{\n    min-block-size: {};\n}}",
1292        opts.target_min
1293    );
1294
1295    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
1296    css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip, unlatched.depth(false), opts));
1297    css.push_str(&depth_rule(
1298        &format!("{chip}.latched"),
1299        unlatched.depth(true),
1300    ));
1301    css
1302}
1303
1304/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
1305///
1306/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
1307/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
1308/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
1309/// three are not one member with a flag.
1310///
1311/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
1312/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
1313///
1314/// Both states emit. Naming only the chosen option leaves an unchosen one
1315/// falling through to [`Depth::Flat`] with nothing drawn for it, so an app has
1316/// to hand-write the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
1317fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1318    let mut css = String::new();
1319    for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
1320        let c = class(option_class(selector), opts);
1321        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
1322        css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, selector.unchosen(), opts));
1323        if selector.joins_its_pane() {
1324            // Every tab in a folder strip rounds at the top and stays square
1325            // at the bottom, chosen or not: the corners belong to the strip's
1326            // shape rather than to which option is up. On the base class and
1327            // not only on the chosen arm, so that an app has no reason left to
1328            // carry a radius of its own. goingson's unlayered `.tab` rule beat
1329            // a chosen-only version of this outright, an unlayered rule being
1330            // ahead of every layer whatever its specificity.
1331            let _ = writeln!(
1332                css,
1333                ".{c} {{\n    border-radius: var(--radius-control) var(--radius-control) 0 0;\n}}"
1334            );
1335            css.push_str(&joined_rule(&c, selector.chosen(), opts));
1336        } else {
1337            css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
1338        }
1339    }
1340    css
1341}
1342
1343/// The chosen option of a selector that joins what it opens.
1344///
1345/// [`depth_rule`] draws a closed box, which is right for anything standing on
1346/// its own and wrong for a folder tab: a closed bottom run reads as a chip
1347/// resting near its pane rather than as the front of it. Three things make the
1348/// join, and all three are needed, which is why this is one rule rather than a
1349/// property added to the depth:
1350///
1351/// - The depth's own fill, so the tab and the pane are the same surface. Taken
1352///   from [`Depth::fill`] rather than named here, so the pairing rule holds.
1353/// - [`Bevel::RaisedOpen`], so the run between the two is not drawn.
1354/// - A pull down by one border width, so the tab covers the pane's own top
1355///   run where it passes underneath. Without it the pane's lit edge draws
1356///   straight across the join and the tab reads as sitting on a line.
1357///
1358/// The corners round at the top and stay square at the bottom for the same
1359/// reason: a rounded bottom corner puts a notch of page colour either side of
1360/// the join. `makeover-geometry` has no per-corner member and does not need
1361/// one, since which corners round is a consequence of the join rather than a
1362/// scale a consumer picks.
1363fn joined_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
1364    let mut body = String::new();
1365    if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
1366        let _ = writeln!(body, "    background: {};", fill_var(fill));
1367    }
1368    let _ = writeln!(
1369        body,
1370        "    box-shadow: var({});",
1371        bevel_var(Bevel::RaisedOpen)
1372    );
1373    // No radius here. Every tab in a joining strip already rounds at the top
1374    // from the base rule, chosen or not, and repeating it on this arm would be
1375    // a second copy of one decision.
1376    let _ = writeln!(
1377        body,
1378        "    margin-block-end: calc(-1 * {});",
1379        opts.border_width
1380    );
1381    // And it has to paint above what it overlaps. Both the tab and the pane are
1382    // in flow, the pane is the later sibling, so without this the pane draws
1383    // over the run the pull-down just covered and the join is undone by the
1384    // pane's own lit edge. Positioned, not raised by `z-index`: being
1385    // positioned is enough to paint above an unpositioned sibling, and a stack
1386    // index here would be a number this crate has no way to keep true against
1387    // whatever an app stacks around it.
1388    let _ = writeln!(body, "    position: relative;");
1389    let mut css = format!(".{selector}.chosen {{\n{body}}}\n");
1390
1391    // A strip that runs down its pane joins it on the side, and the join above
1392    // is written for a strip that runs across. Which way a strip runs is not
1393    // on [`Selector`], and it should not be: it is the arrangement, and the
1394    // renderer drawing the arrangement is the one that knows.
1395    //
1396    // `aria-orientation` is how that renderer has to say it anyway. It is
1397    // ARIA's word rather than a private attribute, required on any vertical
1398    // tablist for a screen reader, so keying on it couples this to the
1399    // standard and not to one caller's markup. Until the side join is drawn,
1400    // a vertical strip takes the closed edge back and reads as a raised chip
1401    // beside its pane, which is what it drew before this rule existed.
1402    let _ = writeln!(
1403        css,
1404        "[aria-orientation=\"vertical\"] .{selector}.chosen {{\n    \
1405         box-shadow: var({});\n    border-radius: var(--radius-control);\n    \
1406         margin-block-end: 0;\n}}",
1407        bevel_var(Bevel::Raised)
1408    );
1409    css
1410}
1411
1412/// The parts of a list row.
1413///
1414/// The list is written out rather than derived because `RowPart` is
1415/// `#[non_exhaustive]`, so there is nothing to iterate. A member added upstream emits no rule until it is named here, which
1416/// is the trade `non_exhaustive` makes: a silent gap instead of a build break.
1417/// [`part_class`] carries the same list and the same obligation.
1418fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1419    let mut css = String::new();
1420
1421    // The container the rows sit in, giving back what a `<ul>` brought. Not a
1422    // size: there is no magnitude in it, which is the line this crate holds.
1423    css.push_str(&Reset::BULLETS.rule(&format!(".{}", class("list", opts))));
1424
1425    for part in [
1426        RowPart::Primary,
1427        RowPart::Secondary,
1428        RowPart::Meta,
1429        RowPart::Actions,
1430        RowPart::Tokens,
1431        RowPart::Proportion,
1432    ] {
1433        let c = class(part_class(part), opts);
1434
1435        // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
1436        // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
1437        // would be louder than saying nothing. Tokens answer alike, for their
1438        // own reason: each token carries its own tone, and a colour on the
1439        // strip would fight the things sitting in it. A proportion is the same
1440        // case again: the meter inside carries the tone.
1441        if !matches!(
1442            part,
1443            RowPart::Actions | RowPart::Tokens | RowPart::Proportion
1444        ) {
1445            let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n    color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
1446        }
1447
1448        // A row's actions are shown at rest. `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` said
1449        // otherwise and was not honoured here from 0.23.0; makeover-layout
1450        // 0.13.0 retired the method, so there is no longer a description saying
1451        // one thing and a renderer doing another.
1452        //
1453        // The rule was `opacity: 0` gated to pointer devices, revealed on
1454        // `:hover` and on `:focus-within`. Each escape it needed was a report
1455        // that hiding was wrong for somebody: `focus-within` because tabbing
1456        // could never reach an action; the gate because a fingertip had no way
1457        // to unhide, which both webview apps had already hand-written
1458        // `opacity: 1` to undo. What was left was a control hidden from
1459        // exactly one group: people using a pointer, who are also the group
1460        // scanning a list to find out what can be done to a row.
1461        //
1462        // A settings screen is where that reads worst: the whole reason to be
1463        // on it is to remove a key, and the button doing so was invisible
1464        // until pointed at. A table cell's actions were never hidden, so the
1465        // two arrangements now agree.
1466    }
1467
1468    // A part that may take two lines. `Flow::Tight` gets no rule: one line is
1469    // what a run already does, and restating it here would put a declaration on
1470    // every part in every row to say nothing.
1471    //
1472    // This is the shape both webview apps had already written by hand and
1473    // commented, Balanced Breakfast on a feed row's title, goingson on a
1474    // problem's body, which is the whole argument for the description
1475    // carrying it. `-webkit-` prefixed and unprefixed together: the prefixed
1476    // trio is what every engine actually implements, and `line-clamp` is the
1477    // standard property landing behind it.
1478    let _ = writeln!(
1479        css,
1480        ".{} {{\n    display: -webkit-box;\n    -webkit-box-orient: vertical;\n    -webkit-line-clamp: {lines};\n    line-clamp: {lines};\n    overflow: hidden;\n}}",
1481        class("row-relaxed", opts),
1482        lines = Flow::Relaxed.lines()
1483    );
1484
1485    // A row inside a hierarchy: a tree, an outline, a threaded list.
1486    // makeover-layout names the concept `Nesting`, deliberately not `Depth`,
1487    // which is surface bevel in that crate, and this is the rule. Without it a
1488    // described outline in a browser is a flat list with chevrons in it: the
1489    // folding works and the indent does not exist.
1490    //
1491    // The magnitude is a custom property with a fallback, which is this crate's
1492    // own shape: `--awaiting-gap` above is the precedent, and an app overriding
1493    // `--row-indent` is how a level becomes worth more or less. What a level IS
1494    // stays the description's; what it is WORTH is a renderer's, and a terminal
1495    // spending columns for the same fact is not disagreeing.
1496    //
1497    // Here rather than in each app, and that was a live option rather than an
1498    // oversight. `row-select`, `row-current` and `row-chosen` are app-styled by
1499    // design; the indent is not decoration, it is what the description MEANS,
1500    // and three apps agreeing about it by accident is not agreement.
1501    //
1502    // `padding` and not `margin`: a row is a box that can be selected and
1503    // hovered, and indenting with margin would take the indent out of the
1504    // highlight, so the shading under a nested row would start where its text
1505    // does rather than where its row does.
1506    let _ = writeln!(
1507        css,
1508        ".{} {{\n    padding-inline-start: calc(var(--row-depth, 0) * var(--row-indent, 1.5ch));\n}}",
1509        class("row-nested", opts)
1510    );
1511
1512    // The two halves of a branch, emitted by quasi-webview and unstyled until
1513    // now for the same reason.
1514    //
1515    // A branch row is the one a reader can fold, and the chevron is its hit
1516    // target. The chevron is drawn by the app or the description, this says
1517    // where it sits and how big the target is, which is the accessibility fact
1518    // rather than the decorative one: a control smaller than this is one a
1519    // finger misses.
1520    let _ = writeln!(
1521        css,
1522        ".{} {{\n    display: flex;\n    align-items: baseline;\n    gap: var(--row-disclose-gap, 0.5ch);\n}}",
1523        class("row-branch", opts)
1524    );
1525    let _ = writeln!(
1526        css,
1527        ".{} {{\n    flex: none;\n    min-inline-size: var(--tap-target, 2rem);\n    min-block-size: var(--tap-target, 2rem);\n    background: none;\n    border: 0;\n    color: inherit;\n    cursor: pointer;\n}}",
1528        class("row-disclose", opts)
1529    );
1530
1531    // How a part holds what is in it, for a row and for a table cell. Here
1532    // rather than in quasi-webview's arrangement sheet because these are names
1533    // this crate emits, so a row an app writes by hand gets them too. The row
1534    // itself stays quasi-webview's: where a part sits in the line is the screen
1535    // renderer's arrangement, and nothing here says it.
1536    //
1537    // A token or a control never breaks across two lines. What gives when the
1538    // line runs short is the row's text.
1539    let tokens = class(part_class(RowPart::Tokens), opts);
1540    let actions = class(part_class(RowPart::Actions), opts);
1541    let proportion = class(part_class(RowPart::Proportion), opts);
1542    let fallback = class("row-part", opts);
1543    let cell_tokens = class(cell_part_class(CellPart::Tokens), opts);
1544    let cell_actions = class(cell_part_class(CellPart::Actions), opts);
1545    let cell_fallback = class("cell-part", opts);
1546    let _ = writeln!(
1547        css,
1548        ".{fallback},\n.{cell_fallback} {{\n    min-width: 0;\n}}"
1549    );
1550    let _ = writeln!(
1551        css,
1552        ".{tokens} {{\n    display: flex;\n    flex-wrap: wrap;\n    align-items: center;\n    gap: var(--gap-bound);\n}}"
1553    );
1554    let _ = writeln!(
1555        css,
1556        ".{actions} {{\n    display: flex;\n    flex: none;\n    align-items: center;\n    gap: var(--gap-bound);\n}}"
1557    );
1558    // A cell's parts sit inside the cell's own box, so they are inline: the
1559    // cell's alignment, which the column kind sets, still places them.
1560    let _ = writeln!(
1561        css,
1562        ".{cell_tokens},\n.{cell_actions} {{\n    display: inline-flex;\n    align-items: center;\n    gap: var(--gap-bound);\n}}"
1563    );
1564    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{cell_tokens} {{\n    flex-wrap: wrap;\n}}");
1565    let _ = writeln!(
1566        css,
1567        ".{tokens} > *,\n.{actions} > *,\n.{cell_tokens} > *,\n.{cell_actions} > * {{\n    white-space: nowrap;\n}}"
1568    );
1569    // A proportion is a meter, and a meter is as wide as the row lets it be.
1570    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{proportion} {{\n    flex: 1 1 auto;\n}}");
1571
1572    css
1573}
1574
1575/// A row of things that share their space, and what each fallback gets here.
1576///
1577/// Ruling: wiki `layout-room-and-fallback`, Max. Rule 1 is that every described
1578/// member is in flow, and these rules are how that is kept rather than asked
1579/// for. A member taken out of flow with `position: absolute` contributes zero
1580/// width to the row it shares, so nothing can collide with it and nothing
1581/// prevents the collision.
1582///
1583/// # The floor, which is most of the fix
1584///
1585/// `.run > *` gets `min-width: min-content`. That is the derived minimum the
1586/// ruling asks for, in this renderer's own unit and stated by the browser
1587/// rather than by anybody: a member cannot be squeezed narrower than what is
1588/// in it, so members in one flow push each other instead of overlapping. It
1589/// costs no query and no number, and it is what fixes all four measured widths
1590/// whichever fallback the group declared.
1591///
1592/// # A member that asks to fill
1593///
1594/// `.run > [data-width="fill"]` gets `flex: 1 1 0`, which is the second half of
1595/// what a column has always been able to say, reaching a row of regions.
1596/// `flex-basis: 0` and not `auto` is what makes several fills divide the room
1597/// equally rather than dividing the leftovers in proportion to their contents;
1598/// equal division is [`makeover_layout::Width::Fill`]'s own stated rule. The
1599/// floor above still applies, so a fill cannot shrink under what is in it.
1600///
1601/// A member that says nothing gets nothing, because a flex item with the floor
1602/// and no grow is already content-sized. That is why the omitted value here is
1603/// `Content` while a control omits `Fill`: each position leaves out what it
1604/// already did.
1605///
1606/// # What each fallback gets, exactly
1607///
1608/// [`Fallback::Wrap`] is `flex-wrap: wrap`, and a member that asks to fill gets
1609/// a stated room to start from.
1610///
1611/// Wrapping on its own is not exact. A flex line
1612/// breaks on each member's hypothetical size, a fill member's basis is `0`, and
1613/// the floor above is `min-content`, so the line breaks only once the members'
1614/// intrinsic widths no longer fit. A member holding a table reports almost
1615/// nothing for that: a table's headings and cells are `container-type:
1616/// inline-size`, so the size container refuses to be measured through and a few
1617/// headings are all that is left. Two fill members each holding a table drew as
1618/// two slivers side by side at 420 while both tables overflowed, and the page
1619/// scrolled sideways.
1620///
1621/// So under `Wrap` a fill member's `flex-basis` is
1622/// `min(100%, var(--run-room, 20rem))` rather than `0`: room the description
1623/// states, rather than room measured through a container that will not report
1624/// it. `min(100%, ...)` is what keeps a lone member from overflowing a run
1625/// narrower than the room, and it is the shape quasi's own `main.list-detail`
1626/// regions already fold on. The custom property is how an app says what the
1627/// room is, because the number is a size and sizes are the app's; the fallback
1628/// is a default rather than this crate settling a width.
1629///
1630/// Only under `Wrap`. A fill member in a run that does not wrap keeps
1631/// `flex: 1 1 0`, where equal division is the whole of what it asked for and
1632/// there is no line to break.
1633///
1634/// [`Fallback::Stack`] is wrap plus `flex: 1 1 max-content` on the members, so
1635/// a member that cannot sit beside its sibling takes a line of its own and
1636/// fills it. For the two-member run this was ruled on, a tab strip and a
1637/// band, that is precisely "a row becomes a column".
1638///
1639/// [`Fallback::Shed`] and [`Fallback::Menu`] get wrap, and this renderer is
1640/// honouring less than the description says. **CSS cannot express either one
1641/// without breaking the ruling's own first constraint.** Both need to know that
1642/// the run is out of room in order to take a member out of it, a container
1643/// query is the only construct that can ask, and `@container` compares against
1644/// a `<length>`, there is no `@container (inline-size < min-content)`. So
1645/// every honest spelling of Shed here needs an authored breakpoint, which is
1646/// the thing the ruling exists to forbid, and the dishonest ones are worse: a
1647/// clamped height clips by document order rather than by [`Priority`], and
1648/// `display: none` under a viewport `@media` is the `nth-child(n+5)` bug the
1649/// vocabulary replaced.
1650///
1651/// Wrapping is the right thing to do instead. It keeps every member reachable,
1652/// which is the property that was actually broken, goingson's new-contact
1653/// button left the viewport entirely at 560, and it keeps rule 1. A renderer
1654/// answering with less than was described is precedented and deliberate here:
1655/// [`makeover_layout::Region::Columns`] says a terminal stacking a board's
1656/// columns is honouring the description rather than degrading it.
1657///
1658/// The real mechanism needs the shed members to have somewhere to go, which is
1659/// markup and belongs to quasi-webview: an overflow control is a member of the
1660/// run, and the description does not yet say that a member *is* one.
1661///
1662/// # Menu, once a script is measuring
1663///
1664/// That is now built, in `quasi-webview`'s `menu.js`, and this crate's half of
1665/// it is two classes and one override. A script that has taken a menu run over
1666/// marks it `data-menu`, and a marked run goes back to `nowrap`: wrapping is
1667/// what hides the overflow condition the script is trying to measure. The
1668/// unmarked rule above is untouched, so a page that ships no script still
1669/// wraps, which is rule 1, every member reachable, rather than a strip with
1670/// tabs squeezed off the end.
1671///
1672/// `.run-overflow` is the control the shed members move into and
1673/// `.run-overflow-items` is where they land. The geometry is this crate's the
1674/// way every other surface's is; what is *in* it is the script's, because which
1675/// members no longer fit is a measurement and not a description.
1676fn run_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1677    let run = class("run", opts);
1678    let mut css = String::new();
1679
1680    // `flex-wrap: nowrap` is stated rather than left to the default, because
1681    // the fallbacks below are read as overrides of this line and a reader
1682    // should not have to know which way flexbox leans to see that.
1683    //
1684    // No gap. Spacing between members is the app's, the same way this crate
1685    // states no margins anywhere else; a gap here would be a size, and the one
1686    // hardcoded size in the mechanism is makeover-geometry's contact patch.
1687    let _ = writeln!(
1688        css,
1689        ".{run} {{\n    display: flex;\n    flex-wrap: nowrap;\n    align-items: center;\n}}"
1690    );
1691
1692    // The derived minimum, and the whole reason a member can no longer be
1693    // overlapped. `min-width: auto` is flexbox's default for a flex item and is
1694    // *not* the same thing: auto lets an item be compressed below its content
1695    // in a nowrap run, which is how a toolbar ends up drawn over a tab strip
1696    // even without anything leaving the flow.
1697    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{run} > * {{\n    min-width: min-content;\n}}");
1698
1699    // A member that absorbs what is left. `flex-basis: 0` rather than `auto` is
1700    // what makes several fills divide the room equally instead of dividing the
1701    // leftovers in proportion to what is already in them, which is
1702    // `Width::Fill`'s own rule and the one thing that type states about more
1703    // than one of them.
1704    //
1705    // The `min-width: min-content` floor above is deliberately not overridden.
1706    // A fill that could shrink below its contents would overlap its neighbour,
1707    // which is rule 1, and equal division under a floor is still equal division
1708    // everywhere the floor is not reached.
1709    //
1710    // Attribute rather than class, because the width is a fact the description
1711    // carried rather than a hook this crate invented: the same division
1712    // `data-tone` and `data-selector` are on the right side of. It beats the
1713    // `Stack` rule below on specificity whichever order they are written in,
1714    // which is what a member asking to fill should do to a blanket.
1715    let _ = writeln!(
1716        css,
1717        ".{run} > [data-width=\"fill\"] {{\n    flex: 1 1 0;\n}}"
1718    );
1719
1720    for fallback in [
1721        Fallback::Wrap,
1722        Fallback::Stack,
1723        Fallback::Shed,
1724        Fallback::Menu,
1725    ] {
1726        let name = fallback_class(fallback);
1727        let c = class(name, opts);
1728        let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n    flex-wrap: wrap;\n}}");
1729        if matches!(fallback, Fallback::Stack) {
1730            let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} > * {{\n    flex: 1 1 max-content;\n}}");
1731        }
1732        // The stated room, and only here. Written after the blanket fill rule
1733        // above so it overrides the basis it set; the grow and shrink that rule
1734        // states are deliberately left alone, so several fills still divide one
1735        // line equally and the min-content floor still stops any of them
1736        // shrinking under its contents.
1737        if matches!(fallback, Fallback::Wrap) {
1738            let _ = writeln!(
1739                css,
1740                ".{c} > [data-width=\"fill\"] {{\n    \
1741                 flex-basis: min(100%, var(--run-room, 20rem));\n}}"
1742            );
1743        }
1744    }
1745
1746    // A menu run a script has taken over. The mark is the script's and this is
1747    // the only rule that reads it: wrapping is what a run does when nothing is
1748    // measuring, and it is also what makes the overflow unmeasurable, since a
1749    // wrapped run always fits. The two cannot both be on.
1750    let menu = class(fallback_class(Fallback::Menu), opts);
1751    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{menu}[data-menu] {{\n    flex-wrap: nowrap;\n}}");
1752
1753    // The overflow control, and it is a member of the run like any other: in
1754    // flow, at the end, taking the width of what is in it. `relative` is what
1755    // the items hang off.
1756    let overflow = class("run-overflow", opts);
1757    let items = class("run-overflow-items", opts);
1758    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{overflow} {{\n    position: relative;\n}}");
1759
1760    // Overlaid rather than in flow, for the reason every menu is: a control
1761    // that pushed the page down when it opened would change the layout it was
1762    // opened to escape. `inset-inline-end: 0` rather than a left, so the panel
1763    // stays on the page in both writing directions.
1764    //
1765    // No width, no padding and no border. All three are sizes and sizes are
1766    // makeover-geometry's; what is stated here is placement, the surface and
1767    // the shadow that separates it from the page, which is the same division
1768    // `figure_rules` and the timeline entry make. The elevation shadow is what
1769    // an overlaid surface takes instead of an edge, see `ELEVATION_PROPERTY`.
1770    let _ = writeln!(
1771        css,
1772        ".{items} {{\n    \
1773         position: absolute;\n    \
1774         inset-block-start: 100%;\n    \
1775         inset-inline-end: 0;\n    \
1776         z-index: 1;\n    \
1777         display: flex;\n    \
1778         flex-direction: column;\n    \
1779         align-items: stretch;\n    \
1780         background: var(--surface-raised);\n    \
1781         box-shadow: var(--elevation-overlay);\n\
1782         }}"
1783    );
1784
1785    // `hidden` is how the script closes it, and a flex display would otherwise
1786    // beat the attribute's own `display: none`.
1787    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{items}[hidden] {{\n    display: none;\n}}");
1788
1789    css
1790}
1791
1792/// Every class [`fallback_class`] can return, plus the run itself.
1793///
1794/// [`ROW_PART_CLASSES`](crate::list::ROW_PART_CLASSES)'s reasoning and the same
1795/// obligation: a `match` over a `#[non_exhaustive]` enum cannot be enumerated
1796/// from outside, so the list sits beside it and a test holds the two together.
1797/// `run` is in it because it is emitted in its own right rather than only as a
1798/// fallback's fallback.
1799pub const RUN_CLASSES: &[&str] = &[
1800    "run",
1801    "run-wrap",
1802    "run-stack",
1803    "run-shed",
1804    "run-menu",
1805    // Not returned by `fallback_class`: these two are the overflow control a
1806    // measuring renderer builds, and they are in the list because the list is
1807    // what a host seals its vocabulary against. A class emitted by a script and
1808    // missing from here is a control with no surface and no edge.
1809    "run-overflow",
1810    "run-overflow-items",
1811];
1812
1813/// The class a run carries for what it does when it is tight.
1814///
1815/// A run always carries `.run` as well, so an unrecognised fallback, the enum
1816/// is `#[non_exhaustive]`, lands as a plain nowrap row with the min-content
1817/// floor still under it. That is the safe failure: every member in flow and
1818/// none overlapped, which is the property, with only the rearrangement missing.
1819#[must_use]
1820pub fn fallback_class(fallback: Fallback) -> &'static str {
1821    match fallback {
1822        Fallback::Wrap => "run-wrap",
1823        Fallback::Stack => "run-stack",
1824        Fallback::Shed => "run-shed",
1825        Fallback::Menu => "run-menu",
1826        _ => "run",
1827    }
1828}
1829
1830/// What a wait looks like, for the attribute that has been describing one to
1831/// nobody.
1832///
1833/// Wiki `loading-and-progress-standard`, phase 2. `data-awaiting` is emitted
1834/// as `data-awaiting="determinate"` with a `data-awaiting-amount` beside it, or
1835/// `data-awaiting="indeterminate"` alone. This is the half that styles them,
1836/// without which the two render identically.
1837///
1838/// # Why it is keyed on `aria-busy` and not on the attribute alone
1839///
1840/// `data-awaiting` is a fact about the control: pressing this waits. It is true
1841/// when the page is painted and it stays true. Whether a wait is *running* is
1842/// true only between two events, so it is the binder's to set, and `aria-busy`
1843/// is the standard spelling of it, announced as well as drawn, which a class
1844/// of our own would not be.
1845///
1846/// That also keeps this crate out of any one client library's vocabulary.
1847/// `quasi-webview` sets `aria-busy` from htmx's request events; a host driving
1848/// the same markup another way sets it the same way and gets the same drawing.
1849///
1850/// # The two drawings
1851///
1852/// One pseudo-element either way, so no renderer has to emit an extra node.
1853///
1854/// Indeterminate is the activity mark of rule 2: a small square that blinks.
1855/// Determinate is a trough with a fill, drawn as a single gradient whose stop is
1856/// `--awaiting-share`, a plain number from 0 to 1 that the binder sets from
1857/// bytes it has actually watched land. A determinate control with nothing
1858/// setting the share draws an empty trough rather than a full one, which is the
1859/// honest reading: the size is known and the delivery is not.
1860///
1861/// **What the bar may not do**, from rule 1 and from `Awaiting`'s own docs:
1862/// what is done over what there is, and never a remaining time, an arrival time
1863/// or a rate extrapolated forward. Nothing here can express one, which is
1864/// deliberate, the only input is a share of a measured payload.
1865///
1866/// # Sizes, and the deferral rule
1867///
1868/// `progress_rules` emits the tones and never the width, because the width is
1869/// not this crate's to know. A pseudo-element has no intrinsic size at all, so
1870/// the same treatment would render nothing anywhere. Both sizes are therefore
1871/// custom properties with defaults: an app that wants a different mark sets
1872/// `--awaiting-mark` and `--awaiting-bar` once, and one that says nothing gets a
1873/// mark that is visible.
1874///
1875/// # The cadence, and what happens without it
1876///
1877/// `--cadence-activity` comes from `makeover-timing` through `makeover-build`,
1878/// and is a half-period, so a full cycle is twice it. It is used bare rather
1879/// than with a fallback: a number written here would be a second heartbeat for
1880/// a mark three renderers draw.
1881///
1882/// A sheet assembled without the time axis leaves `animation-duration` invalid,
1883/// which resolves to `0s`, which runs no animation and leaves the base style ,
1884/// a lit, still mark. That is also exactly what the reduced-motion block does,
1885/// since it sets the cadence to `0ms`. Both fall out of one rule because the
1886/// base style is lit and the keyframes do the dimming, which is the ordering
1887/// `makeover_timing::reduced_motion_css` asks its consumers for by name.
1888fn awaiting_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1889    let mut css = String::new();
1890
1891    // Dimming rather than lighting, so a zero-length animation leaves a lit
1892    // mark rather than a blank one. See `makeover_timing::reduced_motion_css`.
1893    css.push_str(
1894        "@keyframes makeover-activity {\n    \
1895         0%, 49.99% {\n        background: var(--action);\n    }\n    \
1896         50%, 100% {\n        background: var(--surface-sunken);\n    }\n\
1897         }\n",
1898    );
1899
1900    // Nothing is drawn until something is waiting. `content` on the base rule
1901    // rather than on the busy one keeps the box the same box across the
1902    // transition, so a mark appearing does not reflow the line it is in.
1903    let _ = writeln!(
1904        css,
1905        "[data-awaiting]::after {{\n    \
1906         content: \"\";\n    \
1907         display: none;\n    \
1908         margin-inline-start: var(--awaiting-gap, 0.5ch);\n    \
1909         vertical-align: baseline;\n\
1910         }}"
1911    );
1912
1913    let _ = writeln!(
1914        css,
1915        "[data-awaiting][aria-busy=\"true\"]::after {{\n    \
1916         display: inline-block;\n    \
1917         inline-size: var(--awaiting-mark, 0.5em);\n    \
1918         block-size: var(--awaiting-mark, 0.5em);\n    \
1919         background: var(--action);\n    \
1920         opacity: 1;\n    \
1921         animation: makeover-activity calc(var(--cadence-activity) * 2) \
1922         step-end infinite;\n\
1923         }}"
1924    );
1925
1926    // The measured half. A wider box, no blink, and a gradient whose stop is
1927    // the share: the fill and the trough in one paint, so the markup stays one
1928    // pseudo-element on both branches.
1929    //
1930    // `--awaiting-share` unset is an empty trough, not a full one. A bar that
1931    // read full because nobody was counting would be the confidently-wrong
1932    // drawing rule 1 exists to forbid.
1933    //
1934    // The trough takes an edge for the reason a well does: a bar at zero share
1935    // is otherwise a rectangle of the surface it sits on, which is nothing at
1936    // all. `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` and
1937    // `track_rules` write theirs.
1938    let _ = writeln!(
1939        css,
1940        "[data-awaiting=\"determinate\"][aria-busy=\"true\"]::after {{\n    \
1941         inline-size: var(--awaiting-bar, 6em);\n    \
1942         animation: none;\n    \
1943         outline: {} solid var(--border);\n    \
1944         outline-offset: -{};\n    \
1945         background: linear-gradient(\n        \
1946         to inline-end,\n        \
1947         var(--action) 0 calc(var(--awaiting-share, 0) * 100%),\n        \
1948         var(--surface-sunken) 0\n    \
1949         );\n\
1950         }}",
1951        opts.border_width, opts.border_width
1952    );
1953
1954    css
1955}
1956
1957/// A strip of figures, and the two spans inside each one.
1958///
1959/// Colour only, which is the deferral rule applied to a component that badly
1960/// wants to break it. A figure reads as a figure because the value is set large
1961/// over a small caption, and that is a size: `makeover-geometry` answers how
1962/// much space and this crate answers what the thing is. Emitting `font-size`
1963/// here would be this crate naming a value, which is the one thing it is defined
1964/// by not doing, and `progress_rules` is the precedent, it emits the tones and
1965/// never the width, because the width is not its to know.
1966///
1967/// So the type scale is the app's, and what is generated is the part an app
1968/// cannot get right by itself: which of the two spans carries the tone, and,
1969/// from 0.82.0, the strip the figures sit in.
1970/// A definition list, and the two tracks that make its values line up.
1971///
1972/// **The alignment is the whole member.** Five goingson panes were saying
1973/// labelled facts as a row each, and rendered that way every value started
1974/// after its own label, so no column formed and the eye had nothing to run
1975/// down. A grid with one label track sized to the longest label is the fix, and
1976/// it is something only the set can do, which is why `Node::Facts` carries
1977/// the set rather than each pair.
1978///
1979/// `max-content` on the first track and not a fixed width: the label column is
1980/// as wide as the longest label and no wider, which is what keeps a pane of
1981/// short labels from leaving a canyon before the values.
1982///
1983/// The value takes `content` and the label reads back. goingson had that the
1984/// other way round, muted values against unmuted labels, so the part a
1985/// person came for was the quieter of the two. Same rule `figure_rules` states
1986/// for a value against its caption, and `row` for primary against meta.
1987fn facts_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1988    let facts = class("facts", opts);
1989    let label = class("facts-label", opts);
1990    let value = class("facts-value", opts);
1991    let mut css = String::new();
1992
1993    let _ = writeln!(
1994        css,
1995        ".{facts} {{\n    display: grid;\n    grid-template-columns: max-content 1fr;\n    \
1996         column-gap: var(--gap-section);\n    row-gap: var(--gap-peer);\n    margin: 0;\n}}"
1997    );
1998    // `dt` and `dd` both carry a browser margin that would break the tracks.
1999    let _ = writeln!(
2000        css,
2001        ".{facts} > .{label} {{\n    margin: 0;\n    color: var(--content-secondary);\n}}"
2002    );
2003    let _ = writeln!(
2004        css,
2005        ".{facts} > .{value} {{\n    margin: 0;\n    color: var(--content);\n}}"
2006    );
2007    css
2008}
2009
2010/// A picture, its frame and its caption.
2011///
2012/// # The frame is a border, and this is the one place a bevel is wrong
2013///
2014/// Emitting [`Depth::Raised`] here through [`depth_rule`], the same call
2015/// `button` and `card` make, is wrong, and MNW's landing page is where it
2016/// showed: **the frames had no visible edge at all.**
2017///
2018/// `Depth::Raised`'s edge is `--bevel-raised`, which is an *inset* shadow, a
2019/// 1px light run at the top-left and a dark one at the bottom-right, drawn
2020/// **inside** the element's box. On a button or a card that box is a surface
2021/// this crate owns, so an inset edge reads as the surface catching the light.
2022/// On a picture it is drawn on top of the picture, over whatever pixels the
2023/// image happens to have at its border. MNW's screenshots are light-on-light
2024/// parchment, so the light half landed on a light image and the frame
2025/// disappeared.
2026///
2027/// **You cannot bevel a surface you do not own.** A picture's content is the
2028/// app's, arrives at request time, and can be any colour, so its edge has to
2029/// sit *outside* the content rather than on it. That is a border.
2030///
2031/// The fill stays, and it is not decoration: it is what shows through a
2032/// transparent PNG and what stands in the frame's place while the image is
2033/// still loading.
2034///
2035/// This is a real limit on [`Depth`] rather than a special case. Every other
2036/// consumer of a depth draws its own surface; a picture is the first member
2037/// whose surface belongs to someone else.
2038///
2039/// # No size
2040///
2041/// `width: 100%` and nothing else. How large a picture is depends on the box it
2042/// was put in, which is the app's arrangement and `makeover-geometry`'s scales,
2043/// and a renderer that picked one would be answering for every consumer at
2044/// once. This is where `figure_rules` landed for the same reason.
2045fn picture_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2046    let picture = class("picture", opts);
2047    let img = class("picture-img", opts);
2048    let caption = class("picture-caption", opts);
2049    let mut css = String::new();
2050
2051    // Block, or an inline image sits on the text baseline and carries a
2052    // descender's worth of space under it that no app ever wants and every app
2053    // deletes by hand. The border is the frame; see the type docs for why it is
2054    // not the bevel every other surface here gets.
2055    let _ = writeln!(
2056        css,
2057        ".{img} {{\n    display: block;\n    width: 100%;\n    height: auto;\n    \
2058         background: var(--{});\n    border: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
2059        Fill::Raised.token(),
2060        opts.border_width
2061    );
2062
2063    // The two fits that need a rule. `Fit::Natural` emits no attribute at all,
2064    // so it is the bare rule above and needs nothing here.
2065    let _ = writeln!(
2066        css,
2067        ".{img}[data-fit=\"cover\"] {{\n    height: 100%;\n    object-fit: cover;\n}}"
2068    );
2069    let _ = writeln!(
2070        css,
2071        ".{img}[data-fit=\"contain\"] {{\n    height: 100%;\n    object-fit: contain;\n}}"
2072    );
2073
2074    // A caption reads back one step, which is `figure-caption`'s answer and the
2075    // same claim: it says what the thing above it is, and it is not the thing.
2076    let _ = writeln!(
2077        css,
2078        ".{picture} > .{caption} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
2079    );
2080
2081    css
2082}
2083
2084/// A region showing one child at a time, and the chrome that moves between them.
2085///
2086/// [`makeover_layout::Showing`] lets a description say that a region holds
2087/// several children and shows some of them. A renderer derives its own chrome
2088/// from that, which is what stops every renderer growing a `match` on a widget
2089/// name; these are the rules the derived chrome needs.
2090///
2091/// # Why the default is every child, and the enhancement takes them away
2092///
2093/// The controls are a lie until something binds them. A prev button rendered
2094/// into a document with no script is a control that looks live and answers
2095/// nothing, and the reader it lies to is exactly the one who cannot see the
2096/// other children either, the collapsing and the moving are the same half.
2097///
2098/// So the rules run in the direction the enhancement does. Nothing here hides a
2099/// child and nothing here shows a control. Whatever binds the region sets
2100/// `data-ready` on it, and that is what collapses the stack to one and reveals
2101/// the row that moves it. A reader with no script gets every child in order and
2102/// no controls, which is more content rather than less, and a reader with
2103/// script gets a settled page rather than a stack that jumps to one frame after
2104/// load.
2105///
2106/// MNW proved this shape by hand, a `<noscript>` stylesheet opening its
2107/// carousel back out, and it is here rather than there because the property is
2108/// the description's, not one app's.
2109///
2110/// # Not spacing
2111///
2112/// The row's gaps are `makeover-geometry`'s question and are absent for
2113/// [`row_rules`]'s reason. What is here is `display`, which carries no
2114/// magnitude, and the muted readout, which is the same claim `picture-caption`
2115/// makes: it says where you are among the children and it is not one of them.
2116fn showing_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2117    let controls = class("showing", opts);
2118    let position = class("showing-position", opts);
2119    let frame = class("showing-frame", opts);
2120    let mut css = String::new();
2121
2122    // Hidden until something binds it, which is the whole argument above.
2123    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{controls} {{\n    display: none;\n}}");
2124    // Block, and nothing about how the three sit in it. A button and a span are
2125    // inline already, so they make a row without this crate saying so, and
2126    // saying so is where `align-items` and a gap would follow, both spacing,
2127    // both `makeover-geometry`'s, and `row_rules` refuses them for the same
2128    // reason.
2129    let _ = writeln!(
2130        css,
2131        "[data-ready] > .{controls} {{\n    display: block;\n}}"
2132    );
2133
2134    // A child is in flow until the region is bound, and then only the current
2135    // one is. `.current` is a modifier for the reason `.chosen` and `.latched`
2136    // are: one name for the state, set by whoever knows it.
2137    let _ = writeln!(
2138        css,
2139        "[data-ready] > .{frame}:not(.current) {{\n    display: none;\n}}"
2140    );
2141
2142    // Reads back one step. `picture-caption`'s rule and its reason.
2143    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{position} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
2144
2145    css
2146}
2147
2148/// A time axis: the container, its gridlines and ruler, and the placed things.
2149///
2150/// [`Track`](makeover_layout::Track), the one member here whose whole point is
2151/// *position*. That makes the magnitude line this crate keeps worth restating
2152/// rather than assuming.
2153///
2154/// # Where the numbers come from
2155///
2156/// Every value that varies per item is a custom property the caller sets
2157/// inline, and every rule here reads one. `--track-at` and `--track-for` are
2158/// percentages of the span, which
2159/// [`Track::fraction`](makeover_layout::Track::fraction) computes once so three
2160/// renderers cannot disagree about it. Nothing here knows a pixel.
2161///
2162/// That is what lets the stylesheet stay static while the items move: an entry
2163/// carries `style="--track-at: 37.5%; --track-for: 4.166%"` and the rule below
2164/// turns it into a box. The alternative was emitting a rule per item, which is
2165/// a stylesheet that grows with the data.
2166///
2167/// **The height of the track is the app's**, not this crate's. 96 quarter-hour
2168/// slots at some slot height is a size, and a size is `makeover-geometry`'s
2169/// question, the same refusal `figure_rules` and `placeholder_rules` make.
2170/// Percentages need a resolved height above them, so `.track` gets
2171/// `position: relative` and nothing else; the app says how tall a day is.
2172///
2173/// # Overlap
2174///
2175/// Two things at the same time is intrinsic to an axis and has no analogue in a
2176/// list. The description does not declare it, `Placement::overlaps` derives it
2177/// from the times, so what arrives here is a lane index and a lane count, and
2178/// the rule divides the width. A renderer that would rather stack them ignores
2179/// both properties and the defaults give it one full-width lane.
2180fn track_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2181    let track = class("track", opts);
2182    let slot = class("track-slot", opts);
2183    let tick = class("track-tick", opts);
2184    let entry = class("track-entry", opts);
2185    let mut css = String::new();
2186
2187    // The positioning context every entry resolves against, and the whole of
2188    // what this crate says about the container. No height: see the doc above.
2189    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{track} {{\n    position: relative;\n}}");
2190
2191    // Gridlines and the ruler are the axis reading itself back, which is
2192    // `picture-caption` and `showing-position`'s claim: about the thing rather
2193    // than one of the things.
2194    //
2195    // `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` writes its
2196    // edge. A gridline is the one place a timeline would most naturally reach
2197    // for a hardcoded 1px, and a hardcoded 1px is this crate naming a size.
2198    let _ = writeln!(
2199        css,
2200        ".{slot} {{\n    border-top: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
2201        opts.border_width
2202    );
2203    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{tick} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
2204
2205    // The one rule that does real work. Top and height are the placement;
2206    // left and width are the lane. Both lane properties default so an entry
2207    // that names neither is full width, which is the common case and the one a
2208    // renderer gets for free.
2209    let _ = writeln!(
2210        css,
2211        ".{entry} {{\n    \
2212         position: absolute;\n    \
2213         top: var(--track-at, 0%);\n    \
2214         height: var(--track-for, 100%);\n    \
2215         left: calc(var(--track-lane, 0) / var(--track-lanes, 1) * 100%);\n    \
2216         width: calc(100% / var(--track-lanes, 1));\n\
2217         }}"
2218    );
2219
2220    css
2221}
2222
2223/// A region's stand-in, and the header of a table that can be reordered.
2224///
2225/// Both are colour and affordance only, the same place `figure_rules` lands:
2226/// emitting a type scale is not this crate's. How much room
2227/// a stand-in gets is a size, goingson has the same one at three, as
2228/// `--compact`, `--dashboard` and `--padded`, and a size is
2229/// `makeover-geometry`'s question.
2230///
2231/// The caret is the one thing here that is neither colour nor affordance, and it
2232/// is a renderer's own expression rather than a value the description named:
2233/// `aria-sort` is what the table actually says, and this turns it into something
2234/// visible for everyone not using a screen reader. A terminal draws its own; an
2235/// immediate-mode painter draws its own.
2236fn state_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2237    let placeholder = class("placeholder", opts);
2238    let text = class("placeholder-text", opts);
2239    let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
2240    let mut css = String::new();
2241
2242    let _ = writeln!(
2243        css,
2244        ".{placeholder} > .{text} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
2245    );
2246    // Only the failure is toned. An empty list is the normal state of a new
2247    // install, and `Readiness::tone` is what says so.
2248    let _ = writeln!(
2249        css,
2250        ".{placeholder}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{text} {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
2251        Tone::Danger.token()
2252    );
2253    // The way out stands a group apart from the sentence it answers. A gap
2254    // step rather than a size: how much room the stand-in gets is still the
2255    // app's.
2256    let _ = writeln!(
2257        css,
2258        ".{placeholder} > .{} {{\n    margin-block-start: var(--gap-group);\n}}",
2259        class("placeholder-action", opts)
2260    );
2261
2262    // A header that reorders the table is a control, and the pointer is the
2263    // only part of saying so that is not the app's own type and spacing.
2264    let _ = writeln!(
2265        css,
2266        ".{heading}[data-sortable] {{\n    cursor: pointer;\n}}"
2267    );
2268    // The caret carries its own leading space, the way `makeover-tui` and
2269    // `makeover-immediate` both write `" \u{25B2}"`. An app adding the gap
2270    // itself would do it the obvious way, as `content`, and app CSS outranks
2271    // this crate's cascade layer, so it would win over the glyph and leave the
2272    // heading with no caret at all. With the space emitted here there is
2273    // nothing left for one to add.
2274    //
2275    // Three states, three tones, on the convention in wiki
2276    // `three-tone-convention`. A column in force is `content`; a column offering
2277    // to reorder and not doing it now is `content-secondary`, because it still
2278    // answers a press; a column that is not sortable emits no caret at all and
2279    // takes nothing. The idle arm draws its glyph rather than hiding it and
2280    // reserving the box, so there is no reservation to get right.
2281    //
2282    // The glyph is `Sort::glyph`, escaped rather than written: a CSS `content`
2283    // string cannot carry the character literally through this file's own
2284    // escaping, and spelling it here as well would put the third copy back that
2285    // `makeover-layout` 0.27.5 exists to remove.
2286    //
2287    // On the heading's `.cell-in`, so the caret sits beside the label inside
2288    // its padding rather than at the far edge of a column that grew.
2289    let cell_in = class("cell-in", opts);
2290    let _ = writeln!(
2291        css,
2292        ".{heading}[data-sortable] > .{cell_in}::after \
2293         {{\n    content: \" {}\";\n    color: var(--content-secondary);\n}}",
2294        css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())
2295    );
2296    for direction in [Sort::Ascending, Sort::Descending] {
2297        let _ = writeln!(
2298            css,
2299            ".{heading}[aria-sort=\"{}\"] > .{cell_in}::after \
2300             {{\n    content: \" {}\";\n    color: var(--content);\n}}",
2301            direction.as_str(),
2302            css_escape(direction.glyph())
2303        );
2304    }
2305    css
2306}
2307
2308/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
2309///
2310/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
2311/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
2312/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
2313#[must_use]
2314pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2315    let mut css = String::new();
2316    css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
2317    css.push_str(&link_rules(opts));
2318    css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
2319    css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
2320    css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
2321    css.push_str(&run_rules(opts));
2322    css.push_str(&meter::progress_rules(opts));
2323    css.push_str(&chart::rules(opts));
2324    css.push_str(&awaiting_rules(opts));
2325    css.push_str(&figure::figure_rules(opts));
2326    css.push_str(&facts_rules(opts));
2327    css.push_str(&picture_rules(opts));
2328    css.push_str(&showing_rules(opts));
2329    css.push_str(&track_rules(opts));
2330    css.push_str(&state_rules(opts));
2331    css.push_str(&table_rules(opts));
2332    css.push_str(&facet::facet_rules(opts));
2333    css.push_str(&form::group_rules(opts));
2334    css.push_str(&form::editor_rules(opts));
2335    css.push_str(&form::suggestion_rules(opts));
2336    css.push_str(&form::unit_rules(opts));
2337    css.push_str(&form::option_detail_rules(opts));
2338    css.push_str(&form::note_rules(opts));
2339    css.push_str(&leaving_rules());
2340    css
2341}
2342
2343/// How a transient notice goes away.
2344///
2345/// `makeover-timing` says that `Intent::Dismiss` is how long a notice lives
2346/// *before it starts to leave*, and that the leaving itself is `Motion::Fade`.
2347/// `makeover-build` writes `--motion-fade` into every consumer's `timing.css`,
2348/// and this is the rule that reads it. Removing the node the moment the dismiss
2349/// is up skips the leaving entirely.
2350///
2351/// # Why an attribute and not a class
2352///
2353/// [`Emit`]'s prefix moves every class this crate writes, so a class here would
2354/// have to be resolved through `class()` by whoever sets it, and the party
2355/// setting it is a script, which has no prefix to hand. `data-leaving` is
2356/// outside that namespace, so a renderer can set it from JavaScript with no
2357/// coordination.
2358///
2359/// The transition sits on the notice and the opacity on the leaving state, so
2360/// the element is transitionable before the attribute arrives; a transition
2361/// declared in the same rule as the value it changes has nothing to animate
2362/// from.
2363///
2364/// # Reduced motion is handled by the token, not by a second rule here
2365///
2366/// `timing.css` already zeroes `--motion-fade` under `prefers-reduced-motion`.
2367/// The reader who asked for less motion gets an instant change rather than a
2368/// fade, and the renderer that sets the attribute must still remove the node on
2369/// a timer rather than on `transitionend`, a zero-length transition may fire
2370/// no event at all, and a node waiting on one that never comes stays forever.
2371///
2372/// The fallback is `0ms` and not a guessed duration: a page with no timing
2373/// sheet has not opted into this vocabulary, and the honest answer there is the
2374/// behaviour it had before, which is the notice going away at once.
2375fn leaving_rules() -> String {
2376    let mut css = String::new();
2377    let _ = writeln!(
2378        css,
2379        "[data-notice] {{\n    transition: opacity var(--motion-fade, 0ms) \
2380         ease-out;\n}}"
2381    );
2382    let _ = writeln!(css, "[data-notice][data-leaving] {{\n    opacity: 0;\n}}");
2383    css
2384}
2385
2386/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, in
2387/// [`CSS_LAYER`], under a generated-file banner.
2388///
2389/// The banner sits outside the layer, because a comment participates in no
2390/// cascade and a reader opening the file should see what it is before seeing
2391/// an at-rule.
2392#[must_use]
2393pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2394    let body = in_css_layer(&format!(
2395        ":root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
2396        bevel_properties(opts),
2397        depth_rules(opts),
2398        component_rules(opts)
2399    ));
2400    // Counted from the body rather than through `vocabulary::names`, which
2401    // calls back into here.
2402    let classes = vocabulary::classes_in_css(&body).len();
2403    let version = VERSION;
2404    format!(
2405        "/* Generated by makeover-webview {version} from makeover-layout, \
2406         {classes} classes.\n   \
2407         Do not edit. The version and the count are here because a stale\n   \
2408         lockfile fails silently: an older emitter writes a well-formed sheet\n   \
2409         with components missing, and nothing else in the file says so. If\n   \
2410         this version trails what the manifest asks for, re-resolve.\n\n   \
2411         Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n   \
2412         them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout.\n\n   \
2413         Everything below is in the `{CSS_LAYER}` cascade layer. Declare the\n   \
2414         order once in your own stylesheet, or this layer's position is decided\n   \
2415         by whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:\n\n   \
2416         @layer {CSS_LAYER}, base, components, responsive; */\n{body}"
2417    )
2418}
2419
2420#[cfg(test)]
2421mod tests;