makeover_webview/lib.rs
1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet
19//!
20//! This module emits component CSS and no markup, deliberately. GoingsOn has
21//! 145 `innerHTML` sites and Balanced Breakfast 175 `createElement` sites, so
22//! moving markup is a migration where adopting a generated stylesheet is not.
23//! The apps keep every line of their markup and gain the classes.
24//!
25//! It is not a deletion either, which this header claimed until the measurement
26//! came in. Adoption across goingson removed 49 declarations net and *added* 25
27//! lines: a rule loses its depth declarations and gains a variant selector next
28//! to it, so the file stays the same size. What phase A moves is where depth is
29//! defined, not how much CSS exists. Numbers and method in the wiki note under
30//! "The deletion test, run".
31//!
32//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
33//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
34//!
35//! # Phase B: the markup, one description at a time
36//!
37//! [`form`] renders [`makeover_layout::Field`], which is the half of phase B
38//! whose description is settled. It emits strings, because both apps
39//! interpolate their fields into larger string-built forms and returning nodes
40//! would rewrite those too. It owns its own escaping, on the reasoning in that
41//! module: a Rust encoder can cover element text and attribute values with one
42//! function, where the apps need four and have to choose correctly at every
43//! call site.
44//!
45//! [`facet`] renders `makeover_layout::Facet`: a dimension a set is narrowed by,
46//! and the one phase-B emitter whose markup an app is not keeping, because the
47//! markup it replaces was two mechanisms rather than one. A tag's selection and
48//! a tag's browse position were separate state on MNW's discover page, which is
49//! why every filter row there carries a tick box *and* a chevron; one gesture
50//! doing both is what lets the second one go.
51//!
52//! [`list`] is the other half: column tracks, the narrowing rules, and the cell
53//! containers a row is made of. It stops at the cell boundary and does not
54//! render what goes inside one, on the reasoning in that module. So phase B is
55//! now the frame around content in both directions, and what an app still owns
56//! is the content itself.
57//!
58//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
59//!
60//! Decided 2026-07-29 against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a
61//! component list. The useful finding there was that `.btn` (line 644),
62//! `.card` (768) and `.tag, .badge` (882) each hand-write the same
63//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
64//!
65//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
66//! not be described as a pure deletion:
67//!
68//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
69//! [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
70//! will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
71//! and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
72//! where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
73//! hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
74//! that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
75//! answer is there and not here.
76//! - **Badges go flat.** See [`token_rules`].
77//!
78//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
79//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
80//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
81//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
82//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
83//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
84//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
85//!
86//! # 0.10.0: the states this crate used to leave to its consumers
87//!
88//! [`interactive_rules`] emitted hover and pressed and stopped, because
89//! `makeover-layout` modelled no interaction state. Focus and disabled were
90//! therefore unsayable, and every app completed the primitive from outside the
91//! only way that works: by out-specifying a rule it does not own. goingson
92//! carries 19 such rules and the MNW server 21, and the three focus rings do
93//! not match each other.
94//!
95//! That also blocked the cascade-layer work outright. An app that declares
96//! `@layer` puts its own rules in a named layer, and unlayered declarations
97//! outrank every named layer regardless of specificity, so all of those
98//! overrides lose in the commit that adopts layers. They cannot simply be
99//! deleted, because they are the only thing supplying the missing states.
100//! Emitting the states here is what turns that adoption into a deletion.
101//!
102//! Four states now, in emission order, and the order is load-bearing: they are
103//! all specificity (0,2,0), so disabled beats hover by coming last and by
104//! nothing else. Nothing here reaches for `:not(:disabled)`, which would raise
105//! a selector this crate will shortly be wrapping in its own layer.
106//!
107//! Hover additionally sits inside a capability query now. `makeover-touch`
108//! answers whether a fingertip has hover and `makeover-geometry` spells the
109//! condition; this crate asks and does not decide. goingson's section 60 exists
110//! solely to take the hover state back on touch, which is a fight it should
111//! never have been handed.
112//!
113//! # 0.11.0: the layer contract
114//!
115//! [`stylesheet`] emits into the `makeover` cascade layer ([`CSS_LAYER`], which
116//! lives in `makeover-geometry` because that is the one crate every CSS emitter
117//! in the family already depends on). `makeover-geometry` 0.6.0 does the same
118//! for `geometry.css`.
119//!
120//! The cascade resolves origin and importance, then layer, then specificity,
121//! then source order, and **unlayered normal declarations outrank every named
122//! layer**. So before this, an app that declared `@layer base, components,
123//! responsive` put every rule it owns into a named layer and lost all of them to
124//! this unlayered file, regardless of specificity and regardless of loading
125//! last. Nothing errors when that happens: the CSS is valid, the minifier is
126//! happy, and buttons and badges look subtly wrong.
127//!
128//! That is why the layer belongs here rather than in each app. An app cannot fix
129//! it from its own stylesheet, because the fix is to layer the file it does not
130//! own.
131//!
132//! **What it flips**, and the reason each app wants a look when it bumps the
133//! pin: a generated rule that currently beats an app rule by being more specific
134//! stops beating it. The direction is always "the app wins", which is what the
135//! apps already assume, but a hand-written rule an app thought was dead can come
136//! back to life.
137//!
138//! An app should declare the order once, or the layer's position is decided by
139//! whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:
140//!
141//! ```css
142//! @layer makeover, base, components, responsive;
143//! ```
144//!
145//! [`in_css_layer`] is re-exported for an app that assembles its own stylesheet
146//! from this crate's pieces. goingson builds `tables.css` in its own `build.rs`
147//! out of [`list::narrowing_css`] and [`list::grid_template_columns`], and those
148//! rules are as generated as the ones here, so they belong in the same layer and
149//! this crate cannot put them there on the app's behalf.
150//!
151//! # 0.12.0: the ring gets its own width
152//!
153//! [`focus_rule`] reused [`Emit::border_width`] and emitted a 1px ring. That was
154//! an implementation convenience dressed as consistency with the invalid-field
155//! ring: a bevel and a focus indicator answer different questions, and only one
156//! of them has to be noticed from across a desk.
157//!
158//! Caught while adopting 0.11.0 into goingson, by the check the adoption tasks
159//! ask for. Every consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose
160//! at least 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
161//! goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve selectors. The
162//! design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px, so deleting the app
163//! rules in favour of it would have thinned the focus indicator everywhere.
164//!
165//! [`Emit::focus_width`] now carries it, defaulting to `2px`, and the offset is
166//! the same magnitude with its sign off the depth. Both values are the measured
167//! consensus rather than a new opinion.
168//!
169//! # 0.57.0: a suggestion's second line, in place of a reason it cannot be picked
170//!
171//! `1fcf2e9b`, ruled by Max 2026-08-21. `Outcome::Suggestions` now carries
172//! `Candidate` rather than `Choice`, and a candidate has no `unavailable`: a
173//! suggestion that cannot be picked is a row a route should not have offered.
174//! What it has instead is a `detail`, the line that tells it from a row reading
175//! the same -- "Format" under audio, software, writing and video.
176//!
177//! So `.form-suggestion-why` is gone and `.form-suggestion-detail` is here, and
178//! the difference is not only the name. `why` was drawn in the disabled token,
179//! which said the row was refusing. A detail orients rather than refuses, so it
180//! is `--content-muted`, which is what every other secondary line in this crate
181//! reads as.
182//!
183//! No consumer is affected: the only emitter is `quasi-webview`, which moves in
184//! the same cascade.
185//!
186//! # 0.56.0: an interval, as the group MNW already wrote by hand
187//!
188//! [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Interval`] emits a `role="group"` named by the
189//! field's label, holding one `<input type="number">` per end. That is not a
190//! shape invented here: MNW's discover sidebar has a `role="group"` with
191//! `aria-labelledby` over `min_price` and `max_price` today, written by hand
192//! because nothing in the description could say the two boxes were one
193//! question. The markup is what the measurement found, and this emits it.
194//!
195//! - **The group carries the error and the descriptions**, on the split
196//! [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Radio`] already uses here: what is wrong is
197//! the answer, and a crossed interval is not the fault of either end.
198//! - **Both boxes take the whole extent.** `min`, `max` and `step` describe the
199//! axis, so they are written twice. The crossing rule is not emitted, because
200//! HTML has no attribute for it and the description does not carry it: it
201//! comes back as an error on the group, like every other refusal.
202//! - **Which end is which is `aria-label` and nothing more.** The description
203//! states direction structurally, by which member holds which name, and never
204//! in words. Visible Min and Max captions are a page's own and reach the
205//! group through [`form::Filling::trailing`].
206//!
207//! [`form::Value::Between`] is the second value. A separator inside one string
208//! would have made this crate the owner of a delimiter that either end could
209//! contain.
210//!
211//! # 0.55.0: a number's unit, as adjacent text
212//!
213//! `makeover-layout` 0.33.0's `Field::unit`. HTML has no unit attribute and
214//! inventing one would be markup nothing reads, so it is a `<span>` after the
215//! control -- and it is named in `aria-describedby` rather than left as
216//! decoration, because a number and what it is measured in are one fact and
217//! reading the first without the second is reading it wrong.
218//!
219//! This is the renderer the member costs something. egui already had somewhere
220//! better than the label to put a unit; here the two placements are equally
221//! adjacent, and what is bought is that the unit is a value a consumer can read
222//! back rather than a suffix on a label it would have to parse.
223//!
224//! # 0.54.0: a curve this renderer can carry, and one it cannot
225//!
226//! `makeover-layout` 0.32.0's `Curve`. A range takes its granularity from the
227//! curve now (`Field::curve.step()`), every other kind keeps `Field::step`, and
228//! `Curve::Linear` emits exactly what it emitted before.
229//!
230//! **A constant-ratio curve still emits a linear track, and that is a
231//! shortfall rather than a decision.** HTML has no logarithmic range input, so
232//! honouring one here means either shipping JS that maps the thumb position to
233//! a value -- renderer-side app code, which is the thing this stack exists to
234//! delete -- or changing what the control submits from a value to a fraction,
235//! and then something has to map it on the way back in. That something is not
236//! this crate: the MNW server reads these forms with its own handlers, so a
237//! fraction arriving where a value is expected would be silent. Filed rather
238//! than guessed at.
239//!
240//! What is not lost: the extent, the granularity, and the value's own units.
241//! What is lost is resolution at the small end, which is exactly the reason an
242//! app asked for a ratio in the first place. No consumer is affected today --
243//! every described range on this path is linear.
244//!
245//! # 0.52.0: a markdown field gets the preview it was permitted
246//!
247//! 0.50.0 marked a [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Rich`] field with
248//! `data-format="markdown"` and stopped there, and nothing read the mark: no
249//! rule, no markup, no selector anywhere in the tree. So a described editor was
250//! a plain textarea carrying an attribute, and MNW converting its four
251//! hand-written section editors onto the member would have *lost* the
252//! Write/Preview pair one of them already has. A permission taken and not spent
253//! turns every conversion into a regression.
254//!
255//! [`form::editor_rules`] and the chrome beside it are the spending. The pair is
256//! a segmented control, so it takes the depth, the focus ring and the chosen
257//! state from rules that already existed; the preview pane is a well, because it
258//! stands where the control stood. Both are gated on the attribute rather than
259//! on a class, which is what the attribute was for.
260//!
261//! **This crate still renders no markdown.** The pane arrives empty and is
262//! filled by whatever binds the editor, which is where the host's sanitiser
263//! already is. A converter here would have moved that guarantee into a crate
264//! with no view of the host's content-security posture.
265//!
266//! # 0.47.0: a range, a chooser's ghost text, and an option that cannot be
267//! picked yet
268//!
269//! `makeover-layout` 0.28.0's three form findings, all of them cheap here and
270//! none of them cheap in the app that found them.
271//!
272//! - `FieldKind::Range` emits `<input type="range">`, and `Field::step` emits
273//! `step`. The step is emitted only when the description carries one: the
274//! browser's own default is `step="1"`, which is what a description means by
275//! saying nothing, and is also what turns a 0-to-1 threshold into a
276//! two-position control.
277//! - A select with nothing chosen emits a disabled, selected, valueless first
278//! option carrying `Field::placeholder`. HTML has no placeholder attribute on
279//! `<select>`; this is the idiom, and `required` keeps working through it
280//! because the option's value is empty.
281//! - `Choice::unavailable` emits `disabled` plus the reason. Where it goes
282//! differs by control and the difference is forced: a radio group gets a
283//! `.form-option-reason` span beside the label, and a `<select>` option has
284//! room for no element at all, so the reason runs into its text.
285//!
286//! # 0.25.0: a cell says what it holds
287//!
288//! 0.23.0 gave a table its layout and left every cell the same. One `.cell`
289//! carried the whole thing, so a cell holding text and a cell holding a button
290//! were one class and one content colour, and a control in a cell was painted
291//! as text. That is the drift [`RowPart::intent`](makeover_layout::RowPart)
292//! has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented for nothing here.
293//!
294//! makeover-layout 0.14.0's [`CellPart`](makeover_layout::CellPart) names the
295//! four things a cell holds, and [`table_rules`] turns them into
296//! `.cell-value`, `.cell-tokens`, `.cell-actions` and `.cell-link`. Only the
297//! first takes a colour: a token carries its own tone, an action is a control
298//! rather than text, and a link takes the action colour from the anchor it is.
299//!
300//! The colour going on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell` is the fix rather
301//! than an implementation detail. On the container it cascades into the parts
302//! that are not text, which is the bug said in one rule.
303//!
304//! [`list::Cell::part`] is `Option<CellPart>` here, where it was
305//! `Option<RowPart>`. A table cell borrowing the list row's vocabulary was the
306//! drift with a type on it: the two answer different questions, and only one of
307//! them was ever about a cell.
308//!
309//! # 0.23.0: a table lays itself out, and a row shows its controls
310//!
311//! Three things a description could say and this renderer had no rule for,
312//! found together by rendering the MNW server's SSH-keys settings tab through
313//! `quasi` and preferring the hand-written Askama original.
314//!
315//! **A table had no layout at all.** [`list::narrowing_css`] emits the track
316//! list, and it has to be called with the columns, so it works where the
317//! columns are known at build time: goingson builds `tables.css` in its own
318//! `build.rs` and is untouched. A table a description produced knows its
319//! columns at render time, and the rules would have had to travel with the
320//! markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs `style-src
321//! 'unsafe-inline'` that the MNW server is working to drop, or the head, which
322//! an htmx fragment swap does not carry. [`table_rules`] lays a table out with
323//! `display: table` instead, which aligns columns across rows knowing nothing
324//! about how many there are. [`Priority`](makeover_layout::Priority) hiding
325//! moves from a generated rule per dropped column to one rule per drop class,
326//! and [`list::column_classes`] is what puts those classes on a cell. A header
327//! row emitted by a renderer's own code should call it too, or the header and
328//! the body disagree about which column just dropped.
329//!
330//! **A destructive button had nowhere for its tone to land.** `.button` carried
331//! no tone, on the reading that a control's colour is its surface. Every
332//! consumer had written the danger rule itself. It joins the badge in taking
333//! the four tones as colour, off `data-tone`.
334//!
335//! **A list rendered as a bulleted list**, because nothing here reset the `ul`
336//! a renderer emits for one.
337//!
338//! `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` also stops being honoured, which its own doc
339//! sanctioned: a renderer decides. It was retired outright in makeover-layout
340//! 0.13.0, once this had been its only consumer for a release. The rule hid a
341//! row's actions until hover,
342//! and every escape it grew was a report that hiding was wrong for somebody:
343//! `focus-within` for the keyboard, the capability gate for a fingertip with no
344//! way to unhide. What survived hid the controls from pointer users alone, who
345//! are the ones scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
346//!
347//! # 0.17.0: the depth classes stop being controls
348//!
349//! [`depth_rules`] gave `.raised` the whole interactive set. A depth is a
350//! statement about shape, so that left the vocabulary with no raised surface
351//! that is merely an object, and an app wanting one had two moves: write its
352//! own class from tokens, or take a control class and cancel the control half.
353//! goingson took the second, in three variants over sixteen elements
354//! (`.card--static` at 14 call sites, `.card--muted` at 2, `.card--shell` at 1),
355//! each re-asserting the resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`.
356//!
357//! Measured before changing it: `.raised` is emitted into goingson, Balanced
358//! Breakfast and the MNW server, and none of the three has a single call site.
359//! The states were unasked-for everywhere at once, and dropping them costs no
360//! migration anywhere.
361//!
362//! `.card` and `.button` are unchanged. They are the same depth *and* controls,
363//! and they take their states from [`surface_rules`], which is where a state
364//! belongs: on the thing that claims to answer a pointer.
365//!
366//! # Substitution, three ways
367//!
368//! `Fill::Well` has no colour on makeover before 2.3.0, and each renderer
369//! answers that differently, which is the evidence that dropping
370//! `Fill::fallback` from the description was right:
371//!
372//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
373//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
374//! terminal would quantise the two together.
375//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
376//! var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
377//! decides anything.
378
379#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
380
381pub mod facet;
382pub mod figure;
383pub mod form;
384pub mod list;
385pub mod meter;
386pub mod placeholder;
387pub mod vocabulary;
388
389/// A render of every emitter, scraped for the classes it wrote.
390///
391/// Test-only, and the guard behind [`vocabulary::names`]. See the module's own
392/// header for why the check renders rather than reads the source.
393#[cfg(test)]
394mod corpus;
395
396use crate::list::{cell_part_class, part_class};
397use makeover_geometry::{Density, SizeClass};
398// Re-exported rather than redefined. An app assembling its own stylesheet out
399// of this crate's pieces needs the same layer name, and most such apps depend
400// on this crate and not on `makeover-geometry` directly: goingson builds
401// `tables.css` in its own build.rs from [`list::narrowing_css`], and those
402// rules are as generated as the ones here.
403pub use makeover_geometry::{CSS_LAYER, in_css_layer};
404use makeover_layout::{
405 Bevel, CellPart, Depth, Fallback, Fill, Flow, Intent, RowPart, Selector, Sort, State, Token,
406 Tone,
407};
408use makeover_touch::Affordance;
409use std::fmt::Write as _;
410
411/// How the emitted CSS is shaped.
412#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
413pub struct Emit {
414 /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
415 ///
416 /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: border widths belong to
417 /// `makeover-geometry` and will come from there once it carries them.
418 pub border_width: &'static str,
419 /// Focus ring thickness, as a CSS length.
420 ///
421 /// Separate from [`border_width`](Self::border_width), which it reused
422 /// until 0.12.0. That reuse was an implementation convenience dressed as
423 /// consistency, and it emitted a 1px ring: a bevel and a focus indicator
424 /// are answering different questions, and only one of them has to be
425 /// noticed from across a desk.
426 ///
427 /// The default is the measured consensus rather than a new opinion. Every
428 /// consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose at least
429 /// 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
430 /// goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve
431 /// selectors. The design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px.
432 pub focus_width: &'static str,
433 /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
434 pub class_prefix: &'static str,
435}
436
437impl Default for Emit {
438 fn default() -> Self {
439 Self {
440 border_width: "1px",
441 focus_width: "2px",
442 class_prefix: "",
443 }
444 }
445}
446
447/// A string as CSS escapes, for a `content` value.
448///
449/// `\u{25B2}` becomes `\25B2`. Emitted escaped rather than literally so the
450/// stylesheet is ASCII whatever the description spells: a `content` string is
451/// read by whatever encoding the consumer serves the file as, and a caret that
452/// depends on that is a caret that works on one machine.
453///
454/// Terminated by the closing quote at every site here. A CSS hex escape takes
455/// up to six digits and ends at the first character that cannot be one, so an
456/// escape followed by more text would need a space that these do not.
457fn css_escape(text: &str) -> String {
458 text.chars().fold(String::new(), |mut out, c| {
459 let _ = write!(out, "\\{:X}", c as u32);
460 out
461 })
462}
463
464/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
465#[must_use]
466pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
467 match bevel {
468 Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
469 Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
470 }
471}
472
473/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
474/// the intent may be absent.
475///
476/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
477/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
478#[must_use]
479pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
480 match fill {
481 Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
482 other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
483 }
484}
485
486/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
487///
488/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
489/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
490/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
491/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
492#[must_use]
493pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
494 let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
495 let w = opts.border_width;
496 format!(
497 "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} -{w} 0 var(--{})",
498 top_left.token(),
499 bottom_right.token()
500 )
501}
502
503/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
504///
505/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
506/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
507/// without the fill reads the property directly.
508#[must_use]
509pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
510 let mut css = String::new();
511 for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset] {
512 let _ = writeln!(
513 css,
514 " {}: {};",
515 bevel_var(bevel),
516 bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
517 );
518 }
519 css.push_str(ELEVATION_PROPERTY);
520 css
521}
522
523/// The cast shadow of a surface that floats over the page.
524///
525/// Composed here for the reason the bevel pair is: `makeover` derives the tone,
526/// this crate owns the geometry, and neither has to know the other's numbers.
527///
528/// **Only for a surface that overlays the page.** A menu, a toast, a popover, a
529/// dropdown. A surface *in* the page takes `.raised` and its bevel, and a rule
530/// that reaches for this on a card or a plate has renamed a literal rather than
531/// replaced it.
532///
533/// Two lengths rather than one, because a single blur reads as a smudge at
534/// plate size and as a halo at menu size. The offset is small and downward: a
535/// Platinum-era menu sits just off the page rather than hovering above it.
536const ELEVATION_PROPERTY: &str =
537 " --elevation-overlay: 0 2px 4px var(--elevation), 0 8px 24px var(--elevation);\n";
538
539/// The class name for a depth.
540#[must_use]
541pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
542 let name = match depth {
543 Depth::Flat => return None,
544 Depth::Raised => "raised",
545 Depth::Well => "well",
546 Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
547 // A depth added to the description since this renderer was last
548 // built. No class, on the same footing as Flat: emitting a name
549 // whose rule body we cannot write would put a class in the markup
550 // that the stylesheet never defines.
551 _ => return None,
552 };
553 Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
554}
555
556/// A prefixed class name.
557///
558/// Public since 0.27.0, for the renderers that emit markup this crate does not.
559/// A screen renderer writing `class="row"` has to prefix it the way the
560/// stylesheet half does or a prefixed app gets rules matching everything except
561/// the elements that renderer wrote, and the failure is invisible: the CSS
562/// stays valid and one element is unstyled. quasi-webview carried a byte
563/// identical copy of this function until it could call this one.
564#[must_use]
565pub fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
566 let mut out = String::with_capacity(opts.class_prefix.len() + name.len());
567 push_class(&mut out, name, opts);
568 out
569}
570
571/// A prefixed class name, written into a buffer the caller already has.
572///
573/// The form the emitters use, and the reason it exists is [`escape_into`]'s:
574/// every class on every element went through a `format!` before 0.40.0,
575/// including the default case where the prefix is empty and the answer is the
576/// argument. A described table row carried roughly eighty transient
577/// allocations, and this and the escaper were most of them.
578///
579/// [`class`] stays for callers holding a name rather than a buffer.
580///
581/// [`escape_into`]: crate::form::escape_into
582pub fn push_class(out: &mut String, name: &str, opts: &Emit) {
583 out.push_str(opts.class_prefix);
584 out.push_str(name);
585}
586
587/// The class an option of a selector carries, which is what the rules key off.
588///
589/// Named for the option and not for the group: [`selector_rules`] styles the
590/// thing that gets picked, so `Selector::Tabs` is `tab` and not `tabs`. The
591/// distinction is not pedantry. quasi-webview spelled these `tabs`, `segmented`
592/// and `option`, put `toggle` on the wrapping element rather than on the
593/// buttons inside it, and every described selector in that renderer came out
594/// with no depth, no focus ring and no chosen state, while the toggle group got
595/// a bevel meant for its buttons.
596///
597/// The chosen option additionally carries `chosen`, the same way a latched chip
598/// carries `latched`. That name is this crate's too; there is no reason for a
599/// caller to spell it, and [`selector_rules`] is where it is written down.
600#[must_use]
601pub fn option_class(selector: Selector) -> &'static str {
602 match selector {
603 Selector::Tabs => "tab",
604 Selector::Segmented => "segment",
605 Selector::Toggle => "toggle",
606 }
607}
608
609/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
610///
611/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
612/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
613/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
614/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
615///
616/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
617/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both, which this did before makeover-layout
618/// 0.3.0, silently dropped the fill for exactly that case. Independent does not
619/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
620/// disagree about what the region is.
621#[must_use]
622pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
623 let mut css = String::new();
624 if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
625 let _ = writeln!(css, " background: {};", fill_var(fill));
626 }
627 if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
628 let _ = writeln!(css, " box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
629 }
630 css
631}
632
633/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
634/// nothing.
635#[must_use]
636pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
637 let body = depth_declarations(depth);
638 if body.is_empty() {
639 return String::new();
640 }
641 format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
642}
643
644/// The media condition a hover rule has to sit inside, or `None` if hover is
645/// unconditional.
646///
647/// Two crates answer this and neither answer is made here. `makeover-touch`
648/// owns *whether* hover exists at a density, and `makeover-geometry` owns how
649/// that capability is spelled as a media condition. Asking both is what stops
650/// this renderer minting a third opinion, which is what all three apps did:
651/// goingson sniffed the user agent, Balanced Breakfast used `(hover: none)`
652/// alone, and the MNW server had no gate at all.
653///
654/// [`SizeClass`] is required by [`Affordance::available`] and ignored by this
655/// member, which reports as much through `reads_size`. Passing Compact is not
656/// a claim about width; the test below pins that every class agrees.
657fn hover_condition() -> Option<&'static str> {
658 if Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact) {
659 // A fingertip grew a hover state. Nothing to gate, and this renderer
660 // should not invent a reason to gate anyway.
661 None
662 } else {
663 Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition())
664 }
665}
666
667/// Put a rule inside a media query, or leave it alone.
668fn gated(condition: Option<&str>, rule: &str) -> String {
669 let Some(condition) = condition else {
670 return rule.to_string();
671 };
672 let mut css = format!("@media {condition} {{\n");
673 for line in rule.lines() {
674 // Blank lines stay blank. Indenting one leaves trailing whitespace,
675 // which is the sort of thing a formatter later reverts and calls a diff.
676 if line.is_empty() {
677 css.push('\n');
678 } else {
679 let _ = writeln!(css, " {line}");
680 }
681 }
682 css.push_str("}\n");
683 css
684}
685
686/// The keyboard focus ring, placed by the depth it lands on.
687///
688/// This is the webview's **focus ring** and nothing more. **Reach** and
689/// **focus** are both the browser's — the document decides what is reachable
690/// and `:focus-visible` decides which reached thing wears the ring — and no
691/// description states either. The three terms are defined once in
692/// `makeover_layout`'s crate header, "Reach, focus and the focus ring".
693///
694/// One ring for the whole system, because a focus ring's job is to be
695/// recognised and three apps having three of them is the failure. What varies
696/// is where it sits, and that comes off [`Depth`] rather than off a per-
697/// component choice: a well takes the ring inside its own edge, and anything
698/// standing proud of the page takes it outside.
699///
700/// `outline` rather than the composed `box-shadow` the invalid-field ring at
701/// [`field_rules`] uses, and deliberately the one place the two rings are built
702/// differently. A `box-shadow` ring has to restate the bevel beside it, because
703/// `box-shadow` is not additive and a lone ring silently drops the well out
704/// from under the element. That restatement is a second copy of the depth,
705/// living in a different function from the first, and it is exactly the
706/// duplication `Depth` exists to prevent. `outline` occupies its own property,
707/// so the bevel survives untouched and there is nothing to keep in agreement.
708/// They render the same: both are a flush ring one border-width wide.
709#[must_use]
710pub fn focus_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
711 let w = opts.focus_width;
712 // Same magnitude either way, and only the sign comes off the depth. Both
713 // values are what the consumers had already converged on independently:
714 // 2px out is what all three wrote, and 2px in is the MNW server's own
715 // answer for the one inset ring it had.
716 let offset = match depth.bevel() {
717 // Inside the well, clear of its edge rather than painted over it.
718 Some(Bevel::Inset) => format!("calc(-1 * {w})"),
719 // Raised, or no edge at all. Outside, standing off by its own width.
720 _ => w.to_string(),
721 };
722 // The token by name. It is `makeover`'s, derived from the action colour,
723 // and reaching it through a description member was a second path to the
724 // same variable for as long as one existed.
725 format!(
726 ".{selector}:focus-visible {{\n outline: {w} solid var(--focus-ring);\n outline-offset: {offset};\n}}\n"
727 )
728}
729
730/// Present, visible, and not answering.
731///
732/// Matches the ARIA attribute as well as the pseudo-class, because `:disabled`
733/// only matches form elements and half the things this crate emits are not
734/// one: a `div` carrying `.chip` or `.tab` can never be `:disabled`. Keying on
735/// the accessible state is the pattern [`field_rules`] already establishes for
736/// `aria-invalid`, on the reasoning that one fact read by both the styling and
737/// the accessibility tree cannot drift from itself.
738///
739/// The rest depth is re-asserted rather than assumed, because this rule has to
740/// beat the hover and pressed rules above it. It does that on source order at
741/// equal specificity, not by out-specifying them: every rule this function's
742/// caller emits is (0,2,0), and adding a `:not(:disabled)` anywhere would raise
743/// one of them and have to be unpicked when this output moves inside its own
744/// cascade layer.
745#[must_use]
746pub fn disabled_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
747 format!(
748 ".{selector}:disabled,\n.{selector}[aria-disabled=\"true\"] {{\n{} color: var(--{});\n cursor: not-allowed;\n}}\n",
749 depth_declarations(depth),
750 State::Disabled.token()
751 )
752}
753
754/// Every state a selector that answers a click implies: hover, pressed, focus
755/// and disabled, in that order.
756///
757/// Order is the whole cascade mechanism here. All four selectors are
758/// specificity (0,2,0), so disabled wins over hover and pressed by coming last
759/// and by nothing else.
760///
761/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
762/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
763/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
764/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
765/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
766/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
767///
768/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
769/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
770/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
771/// consumed until now. What it *is* gated on is capability, via
772/// [`hover_condition`]. Before that gate existed the apps each wrote their own:
773/// goingson's section 60 exists solely to take back the hover state this
774/// function had just handed it, by out-specifying a rule it does not own.
775///
776/// `depth` is the selector's **rest** depth, used to place the focus ring and
777/// to restore the surface under a disabled control. The pressed rule keeps
778/// inverting from [`Depth::Raised`] regardless, which is what every caller got
779/// before this parameter existed: a tab's unchosen depth is
780/// [`Depth::Sunken`], and `Sunken.pressed()` is `Sunken`, so deriving the press
781/// from the rest depth would leave a tab with no press at all.
782#[must_use]
783pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
784 let mut css = gated(
785 hover_condition(),
786 &format!(".{selector}:hover {{\n background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n"),
787 );
788 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
789 &format!("{selector}:active"),
790 Depth::Raised.pressed(),
791 ));
792 css.push_str(&focus_rule(selector, depth, opts));
793 css.push_str(&disabled_rule(selector, depth));
794 css
795}
796
797/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
798///
799/// A depth and nothing else. `.raised` says a surface sits on what is behind
800/// it, which is a statement about the shape and not about what happens when a
801/// pointer arrives, so it emits no hover, press, focus or disabled rule. The
802/// named surfaces are where interaction lives: `.card` and `.button` are the
803/// same depth *and* controls, and they get their states from
804/// [`surface_rules`].
805///
806/// This class carried the interactive set until 0.17.0, which left the
807/// vocabulary with no raised surface that is merely an object. Consumers that
808/// needed one took a control class and cancelled half of it instead: sixteen
809/// elements in goingson across three `.card--*` variants, each re-asserting the
810/// resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`. Nothing anywhere used
811/// `.raised` itself, so the states were unasked-for in every consumer at once.
812#[must_use]
813pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
814 let mut css = String::new();
815 for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
816 let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
817 continue;
818 };
819 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
820 }
821 css
822}
823
824/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
825///
826/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
827/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
828/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
829/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
830/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
831/// drifting apart again.
832fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
833 let mut css = String::new();
834 for name in ["button", "card"] {
835 let c = class(name, opts);
836 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, Depth::Raised));
837 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, Depth::Raised, opts));
838 }
839
840 let field = class("field", opts);
841 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
842
843 // A field takes focus and refuses input like everything else here, and got
844 // neither until now, which is why all three apps hand-write a focus ring
845 // for it and no two of them match. No hover or pressed: a text field does
846 // not light up under the pointer and does not invert when clicked, so the
847 // two states `interactive_rules` would add are the two it does not have.
848 css.push_str(&focus_rule(&field, Depth::Well, opts));
849 css.push_str(&disabled_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
850
851 // Keyed on the ARIA attribute rather than on a class, so the visual state
852 // and the accessible state cannot drift apart: there is one fact and both
853 // read it. goingson already drove its invalid styling this way and was
854 // right to; the `.invalid` class this emitted before 0.5.0 was a second
855 // place to forget.
856 //
857 // The ring composes *after* the bevel rather than replacing it. box-shadow
858 // is not additive, so a lone ring silently dropped the well out from under
859 // an invalid field. Flat and unlit: this edge is saying "wrong", and
860 // lighting one side would have it say "raised" at the same time.
861 let _ = writeln!(
862 css,
863 ".{field}[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {{\n box-shadow: var({}), 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
864 bevel_var(Bevel::Inset),
865 opts.border_width
866 );
867 css
868}
869
870/// Badges and chips.
871///
872/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
873/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
874/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
875/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
876/// decide which of the two it always was.
877///
878/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
879/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
880/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
881/// Text that goes somewhere.
882///
883/// The one inline control, and the vocabulary had no word for it until a
884/// description layer needed one. A table cell has carried `cell-link` since
885/// 0.14.0's part list, deliberately unruled because the cell's own rule covers
886/// it; what was missing is the same thing outside a table, which is what a
887/// described run holds when a sentence contains a link.
888///
889/// Colour and underline only. Whether a link is inline in a sentence or sitting
890/// on its own line is the app's layout, and how much room it takes is
891/// `makeover-geometry`'s. What is here is the pair of signals that say "this
892/// goes somewhere" and nothing that says where it sits.
893///
894/// The visited arm is deliberately absent. A link inside an app points at the
895/// app's own screens, which the user is expected to have been to, so painting
896/// them differently marks almost everything and distinguishes nothing.
897fn link_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
898 let mut css = String::new();
899 let link = class("link", opts);
900
901 let _ = writeln!(
902 css,
903 ".{link} {{\n color: var(--action);\n \
904 text-decoration: underline;\n}}"
905 );
906 // The hover step is the same one every other control takes, and it is a
907 // colour rather than a surface: a link has no box to raise.
908 let _ = writeln!(
909 css,
910 "@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine) {{\n .{link}:hover \
911 {{\n color: var(--action-hover);\n }}\n}}"
912 );
913 let _ = writeln!(
914 css,
915 ".{link}:focus-visible {{\n outline: {} solid var(--focus-ring);\n \
916 outline-offset: 2px;\n}}",
917 opts.focus_width
918 );
919 // A link is often a `<button>` rather than an `<a>`: a renderer picks the
920 // element from the method, so a link that writes is a button that has to
921 // stop looking like one.
922 let _ = writeln!(
923 css,
924 "button.{link} {{\n background: none;\n border: none;\n \
925 padding: 0;\n font: inherit;\n cursor: pointer;\n}}"
926 );
927 css
928}
929
930fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
931 let mut css = String::new();
932
933 // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
934 // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
935 let badge = class("badge", opts);
936 let _ = writeln!(
937 css,
938 ".{badge} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
939 Tone::Neutral.token()
940 );
941 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
942 let _ = writeln!(
943 css,
944 ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
945 tone.token()
946 );
947 }
948
949 // A button carries the four tones a badge does. It had none, on the reading
950 // that a control's colour is its surface rather than its text, and that
951 // reading has one hole big enough to matter: the button that destroys
952 // something. Every consumer had written that rule itself, and a description
953 // that says `Tone::Danger` on an act had nowhere for it to land.
954 //
955 // Colour and not a fill, matching the badge. A red surface is a decision
956 // about emphasis that belongs to an app's own layer, and two of them
957 // fighting is worse than neither.
958 let button = class("button", opts);
959 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
960 let _ = writeln!(
961 css,
962 ".{button}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
963 tone.token()
964 );
965 }
966
967 // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
968 // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
969 // markup and waits for phase B.
970 let chip = class("chip", opts);
971 let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
972 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
973 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip, unlatched.depth(false), opts));
974 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
975 &format!("{chip}.latched"),
976 unlatched.depth(true),
977 ));
978 css
979}
980
981/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
982///
983/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
984/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
985/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
986/// three are not one member with a flag.
987///
988/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
989/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
990///
991/// Both states emit as of makeover-layout 0.3.0. Before it the description
992/// named only the chosen option, so an unchosen one fell through to
993/// [`Depth::Flat`] and nothing was drawn for it, which left goingson's tab
994/// strip hand-writing the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
995fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
996 let mut css = String::new();
997 for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
998 let c = class(option_class(selector), opts);
999 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
1000 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, selector.unchosen(), opts));
1001 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
1002 }
1003 css
1004}
1005
1006/// The parts of a list row.
1007///
1008/// The list is written out rather than derived because `RowPart` is
1009/// `#[non_exhaustive]` as of makeover-layout 0.9.0, so there is nothing to
1010/// iterate. A member added upstream emits no rule until it is named here, which
1011/// is the trade `non_exhaustive` makes: a silent gap instead of a build break.
1012/// [`part_class`] carries the same list and the same obligation.
1013fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1014 let mut css = String::new();
1015
1016 // The container the rows sit in. Three zeroes and a keyword, all of them
1017 // undoing a browser default the description never asked for: a described
1018 // list of SSH keys is not a bulleted list, and it rendered as one because
1019 // nothing here said otherwise. Not a size: there is no magnitude in it,
1020 // which is the line this crate holds.
1021 let _ = writeln!(
1022 css,
1023 ".{} {{\n list-style: none;\n margin: 0;\n padding: 0;\n}}",
1024 class("list", opts)
1025 );
1026
1027 for part in [
1028 RowPart::Primary,
1029 RowPart::Secondary,
1030 RowPart::Meta,
1031 RowPart::Actions,
1032 RowPart::Tokens,
1033 RowPart::Proportion,
1034 ] {
1035 let c = class(part_class(part), opts);
1036
1037 // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
1038 // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
1039 // would be louder than saying nothing. Tokens answer alike, for their
1040 // own reason: each token carries its own tone, and a colour on the
1041 // strip would fight the things sitting in it. A proportion is the same
1042 // case again: the meter inside carries the tone.
1043 if !matches!(
1044 part,
1045 RowPart::Actions | RowPart::Tokens | RowPart::Proportion
1046 ) {
1047 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
1048 }
1049
1050 // A row's actions are shown at rest. `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` said
1051 // otherwise and was not honoured here from 0.23.0; makeover-layout
1052 // 0.13.0 retired the method, so there is no longer a description saying
1053 // one thing and a renderer doing another.
1054 //
1055 // The rule was `opacity: 0` gated to pointer devices, revealed on
1056 // `:hover` and on `:focus-within`. Each escape it needed was a report
1057 // that hiding was wrong for somebody: `focus-within` because tabbing
1058 // could never reach an action; the gate because a fingertip had no way
1059 // to unhide, which both webview apps had already hand-written
1060 // `opacity: 1` to undo. What was left was a control hidden from
1061 // exactly one group: people using a pointer, who are also the group
1062 // scanning a list to find out what can be done to a row.
1063 //
1064 // A settings screen is where that reads worst: the whole reason to be
1065 // on it is to remove a key, and the button doing so was invisible
1066 // until pointed at. A table cell's actions were never hidden, so the
1067 // two arrangements now agree.
1068 }
1069
1070 // A part that may take two lines. `Flow::Tight` gets no rule: one line is
1071 // what a run already does, and restating it here would put a declaration on
1072 // every part in every row to say nothing.
1073 //
1074 // This is the shape both webview apps had already written by hand and
1075 // commented -- Balanced Breakfast on a feed row's title, goingson on a
1076 // problem's body -- which is the whole argument for the description
1077 // carrying it. `-webkit-` prefixed and unprefixed together: the prefixed
1078 // trio is what every engine actually implements, and `line-clamp` is the
1079 // standard property landing behind it.
1080 let _ = writeln!(
1081 css,
1082 ".{} {{\n display: -webkit-box;\n -webkit-box-orient: vertical;\n -webkit-line-clamp: {lines};\n line-clamp: {lines};\n overflow: hidden;\n}}",
1083 class("row-relaxed", opts),
1084 lines = Flow::Relaxed.lines()
1085 );
1086
1087 css
1088}
1089
1090/// A row of things that share their space, and what each fallback gets here.
1091///
1092/// Ruling: wiki `layout-room-and-fallback`, Max 2026-08-18. The bug it answers
1093/// is goingson's `styles.css:702`, which pinned every `.page-header` over the
1094/// pill strip with `position: absolute` and so took the toolbar out of flow:
1095/// zero width contributed to the row it shared, nothing able to collide with
1096/// it, and therefore nothing preventing the collision. Rule 1 of the ruling is
1097/// that every described member is in flow, and these rules are how that is kept
1098/// rather than asked for.
1099///
1100/// # The floor, which is most of the fix
1101///
1102/// `.run > *` gets `min-width: min-content`. That is the derived minimum the
1103/// ruling asks for, in this renderer's own unit and stated by the browser
1104/// rather than by anybody: a member cannot be squeezed narrower than what is
1105/// in it, so members in one flow push each other instead of overlapping. It
1106/// costs no query and no number, and it is what fixes all four measured widths
1107/// whichever fallback the group declared.
1108///
1109/// # What each fallback gets, exactly
1110///
1111/// [`Fallback::Wrap`] is `flex-wrap: wrap`, which is exact. The browser wraps
1112/// the run when the members no longer fit, deciding that from their own
1113/// intrinsic widths, which is the derived minimum doing the whole job.
1114///
1115/// [`Fallback::Stack`] is wrap plus `flex: 1 1 max-content` on the members, so
1116/// a member that cannot sit beside its sibling takes a line of its own and
1117/// fills it. For the two-member run this was ruled on -- a tab strip and a
1118/// band -- that is precisely "a row becomes a column".
1119///
1120/// [`Fallback::Shed`] and [`Fallback::Menu`] get wrap, and this renderer is
1121/// honouring less than the description says. **CSS cannot express either one
1122/// without breaking the ruling's own first constraint.** Both need to know that
1123/// the run is out of room in order to take a member out of it, a container
1124/// query is the only construct that can ask, and `@container` compares against
1125/// a `<length>` -- there is no `@container (inline-size < min-content)`. So
1126/// every honest spelling of Shed here needs an authored breakpoint, which is
1127/// the thing the ruling exists to forbid, and the dishonest ones are worse: a
1128/// clamped height clips by document order rather than by [`Priority`], and
1129/// `display: none` under a viewport `@media` is the `nth-child(n+5)` bug the
1130/// vocabulary replaced.
1131///
1132/// Wrapping is the right thing to do instead. It keeps every member reachable,
1133/// which is the property that was actually broken -- goingson's new-contact
1134/// button left the viewport entirely at 560 -- and it keeps rule 1. A renderer
1135/// answering with less than was described is precedented and deliberate here:
1136/// [`makeover_layout::Region::Columns`] says a terminal stacking a board's
1137/// columns is honouring the description rather than degrading it.
1138///
1139/// The real mechanism needs the shed members to have somewhere to go, which is
1140/// markup and belongs to quasi-webview: an overflow control is a member of the
1141/// run, and the description does not yet say that a member *is* one. Filed
1142/// rather than guessed at.
1143fn run_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1144 let run = class("run", opts);
1145 let mut css = String::new();
1146
1147 // `flex-wrap: nowrap` is stated rather than left to the default, because
1148 // the fallbacks below are read as overrides of this line and a reader
1149 // should not have to know which way flexbox leans to see that.
1150 //
1151 // No gap. Spacing between members is the app's, the same way this crate
1152 // states no margins anywhere else; a gap here would be a size, and the one
1153 // hardcoded size in the mechanism is makeover-geometry's contact patch.
1154 let _ = writeln!(
1155 css,
1156 ".{run} {{\n display: flex;\n flex-wrap: nowrap;\n align-items: center;\n}}"
1157 );
1158
1159 // The derived minimum, and the whole reason a member can no longer be
1160 // overlapped. `min-width: auto` is flexbox's default for a flex item and is
1161 // *not* the same thing: auto lets an item be compressed below its content
1162 // in a nowrap run, which is how a toolbar ends up drawn over a tab strip
1163 // even without anything leaving the flow.
1164 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{run} > * {{\n min-width: min-content;\n}}");
1165
1166 for fallback in [
1167 Fallback::Wrap,
1168 Fallback::Stack,
1169 Fallback::Shed,
1170 Fallback::Menu,
1171 ] {
1172 let name = fallback_class(fallback);
1173 let c = class(name, opts);
1174 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n flex-wrap: wrap;\n}}");
1175 if matches!(fallback, Fallback::Stack) {
1176 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} > * {{\n flex: 1 1 max-content;\n}}");
1177 }
1178 }
1179
1180 css
1181}
1182
1183/// Every class [`fallback_class`] can return, plus the run itself.
1184///
1185/// [`ROW_PART_CLASSES`](crate::list::ROW_PART_CLASSES)'s reasoning and the same
1186/// obligation: a `match` over a `#[non_exhaustive]` enum cannot be enumerated
1187/// from outside, so the list sits beside it and a test holds the two together.
1188/// `run` is in it because it is emitted in its own right rather than only as a
1189/// fallback's fallback.
1190pub const RUN_CLASSES: &[&str] = &["run", "run-wrap", "run-stack", "run-shed", "run-menu"];
1191
1192/// The class a run carries for what it does when it is tight.
1193///
1194/// A run always carries `.run` as well, so an unrecognised fallback -- the enum
1195/// is `#[non_exhaustive]` -- lands as a plain nowrap row with the min-content
1196/// floor still under it. That is the safe failure: every member in flow and
1197/// none overlapped, which is the property, with only the rearrangement missing.
1198#[must_use]
1199pub fn fallback_class(fallback: Fallback) -> &'static str {
1200 match fallback {
1201 Fallback::Wrap => "run-wrap",
1202 Fallback::Stack => "run-stack",
1203 Fallback::Shed => "run-shed",
1204 Fallback::Menu => "run-menu",
1205 _ => "run",
1206 }
1207}
1208
1209/// The progress trough these rules fill.
1210///
1211/// This was renderer-local chrome with nothing behind it until makeover-layout
1212/// 0.10.0, which is the unusual order: the tones below were emitted for every
1213/// bar in the tree while the only way to describe one was to concatenate the
1214/// numbers into a heading. `Meter` is the word that arrived late, and
1215/// [`meter::meter_html`](crate::meter::meter_html) is what now fills these.
1216///
1217/// The rules stay a superset of what a description can ask for. An app drawing
1218/// its own bar keeps these classes, which is what the four goingson grew
1219/// independently were adopted onto.
1220///
1221/// The trough is a [`Depth::Well`], the same reading a text field gets:
1222/// something with its content down inside it.
1223fn progress_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1224 let progress = class("progress", opts);
1225 // `progress-fill` rather than a bare `fill`: an unprefixed build claims
1226 // these names in the app's own stylesheet, and `.fill` is grabby enough to
1227 // catch things that have nothing to do with progress. goingson already
1228 // calls it `.progress-fill`, so this is also the name that deletes.
1229 let fill = class("progress-fill", opts);
1230 let mut css = depth_rule(&progress, Depth::Well);
1231
1232 // The untoned bar is `--action`, not [`Tone::Neutral`]. That is the one
1233 // place this differs from the badge rules, and deliberately: a badge with
1234 // no status is a muted label, while a bar with no status is still
1235 // reporting progress, and `content-muted` would read as disabled.
1236 let _ = writeln!(
1237 css,
1238 ".{progress} > .{fill} {{\n background: var(--action);\n}}"
1239 );
1240
1241 // A bar can be saying something, same as a badge: goingson colours subtask
1242 // progress as success and an over-estimate as danger, which is real
1243 // information rather than decoration. Emitting the tones is what lets that
1244 // survive adoption instead of staying hand-written.
1245 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1246 let _ = writeln!(
1247 css,
1248 ".{progress} > .{fill}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n background: var(--{0});\n}}",
1249 tone.token()
1250 );
1251 }
1252 css
1253}
1254
1255/// A strip of figures, and the two spans inside each one.
1256///
1257/// Colour only, which is the deferral rule applied to a component that badly
1258/// wants to break it. A figure reads as a figure because the value is set large
1259/// over a small caption, and that is a size: `makeover-geometry` answers how
1260/// much space and this crate answers what the thing is. Emitting `font-size`
1261/// here would be this crate naming a value, which is the one thing it is defined
1262/// by not doing, and `progress_rules` is the precedent — it emits the tones and
1263/// never the width, because the width is not its to know.
1264///
1265/// So the arrangement and the type scale are the app's, and what is generated is
1266/// the part an app cannot get right by itself: which of the two spans carries
1267/// the tone.
1268fn figure_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1269 let figure = class("figure", opts);
1270 let value = class("figure-value", opts);
1271 let caption = class("figure-caption", opts);
1272 let change = class("figure-change", opts);
1273 let mut css = String::new();
1274
1275 let _ = writeln!(
1276 css,
1277 ".{figure} > .{value} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
1278 Tone::Neutral.token()
1279 );
1280 let _ = writeln!(
1281 css,
1282 ".{figure} > .{caption} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1283 );
1284 let _ = writeln!(
1285 css,
1286 ".{figure} > .{change} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1287 );
1288
1289 // A toned figure tones one part and never the caption. The caption is the
1290 // noun and stays muted.
1291 //
1292 // Which part depends on whether there is a change, and that is the whole of
1293 // what 0.13.0 changed here. A figure with a delta is an ordinary number that
1294 // has moved in a direction worth reading, so the delta takes the colour and
1295 // the number stays plain; a figure without one has nowhere else to put it.
1296 // `:has` is what lets one attribute mean both, and the alternative was the
1297 // emitter deciding by writing the attribute onto a different element, which
1298 // leaves two elements able to disagree about a figure's one meaning.
1299 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1300 let _ = writeln!(
1301 css,
1302 ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{change} {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1303 tone.token()
1304 );
1305 let _ = writeln!(
1306 css,
1307 ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"]:not(:has(> .{change})) > .{value} \
1308 {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1309 tone.token()
1310 );
1311 }
1312 css
1313}
1314
1315/// A picture, its frame and its caption.
1316///
1317/// `makeover_layout::Image` arrived at 0.21.0, found by trying to describe MNW's
1318/// carousel and discovering nothing named a picture.
1319///
1320/// # The frame is a border, and this is the one place a bevel is wrong
1321///
1322/// 0.36.0 emitted [`Depth::Raised`] here through [`depth_rule`], the same call
1323/// `button` and `card` make. It was wrong, and MNW's landing page is where it
1324/// showed: **the frames had no visible edge at all.**
1325///
1326/// `Depth::Raised`'s edge is `--bevel-raised`, which is an *inset* shadow — a
1327/// 1px light run at the top-left and a dark one at the bottom-right, drawn
1328/// **inside** the element's box. On a button or a card that box is a surface
1329/// this crate owns, so an inset edge reads as the surface catching the light.
1330/// On a picture it is drawn on top of the picture, over whatever pixels the
1331/// image happens to have at its border. MNW's screenshots are light-on-light
1332/// parchment, so the light half landed on a light image and the frame
1333/// disappeared.
1334///
1335/// **You cannot bevel a surface you do not own.** A picture's content is the
1336/// app's, arrives at request time, and can be any colour, so its edge has to
1337/// sit *outside* the content rather than on it. That is a border.
1338///
1339/// The fill stays, and it is not decoration: it is what shows through a
1340/// transparent PNG and what stands in the frame's place while the image is
1341/// still loading.
1342///
1343/// This is a real limit on [`Depth`] rather than a special case. Every other
1344/// consumer of a depth draws its own surface; a picture is the first member
1345/// whose surface belongs to someone else.
1346///
1347/// # No size
1348///
1349/// `width: 100%` and nothing else. How large a picture is depends on the box it
1350/// was put in, which is the app's arrangement and `makeover-geometry`'s scales,
1351/// and a renderer that picked one would be answering for every consumer at
1352/// once. This is where `figure_rules` landed for the same reason.
1353fn picture_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1354 let picture = class("picture", opts);
1355 let img = class("picture-img", opts);
1356 let caption = class("picture-caption", opts);
1357 let mut css = String::new();
1358
1359 // Block, or an inline image sits on the text baseline and carries a
1360 // descender's worth of space under it that no app ever wants and every app
1361 // deletes by hand. The border is the frame; see the type docs for why it is
1362 // not the bevel every other surface here gets.
1363 let _ = writeln!(
1364 css,
1365 ".{img} {{\n display: block;\n width: 100%;\n height: auto;\n \
1366 background: var(--{});\n border: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1367 Fill::Raised.token(),
1368 opts.border_width
1369 );
1370
1371 // The two fits that need a rule. `Fit::Natural` emits no attribute at all,
1372 // so it is the bare rule above and needs nothing here.
1373 let _ = writeln!(
1374 css,
1375 ".{img}[data-fit=\"cover\"] {{\n height: 100%;\n object-fit: cover;\n}}"
1376 );
1377 let _ = writeln!(
1378 css,
1379 ".{img}[data-fit=\"contain\"] {{\n height: 100%;\n object-fit: contain;\n}}"
1380 );
1381
1382 // A caption reads back one step, which is `figure-caption`'s answer and the
1383 // same claim: it says what the thing above it is, and it is not the thing.
1384 let _ = writeln!(
1385 css,
1386 ".{picture} > .{caption} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1387 );
1388
1389 css
1390}
1391
1392/// A region showing one child at a time, and the chrome that moves between them.
1393///
1394/// [`makeover_layout::Showing`] lets a description say that a region holds
1395/// several children and shows some of them. A renderer derives its own chrome
1396/// from that, which is what stops every renderer growing a `match` on a widget
1397/// name; these are the rules the derived chrome needs.
1398///
1399/// # Why the default is every child, and the enhancement takes them away
1400///
1401/// The controls are a lie until something binds them. A prev button rendered
1402/// into a document with no script is a control that looks live and answers
1403/// nothing, and the reader it lies to is exactly the one who cannot see the
1404/// other children either — the collapsing and the moving are the same half.
1405///
1406/// So the rules run in the direction the enhancement does. Nothing here hides a
1407/// child and nothing here shows a control. Whatever binds the region sets
1408/// `data-ready` on it, and that is what collapses the stack to one and reveals
1409/// the row that moves it. A reader with no script gets every child in order and
1410/// no controls, which is more content rather than less, and a reader with
1411/// script gets a settled page rather than a stack that jumps to one frame after
1412/// load.
1413///
1414/// MNW proved this shape by hand — a `<noscript>` stylesheet opening its
1415/// carousel back out — and it is here rather than there because the property is
1416/// the description's, not one app's.
1417///
1418/// # Not spacing
1419///
1420/// The row's gaps are `makeover-geometry`'s question and are absent for
1421/// [`row_rules`]'s reason. What is here is `display`, which carries no
1422/// magnitude, and the muted readout, which is the same claim `picture-caption`
1423/// makes: it says where you are among the children and it is not one of them.
1424fn showing_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1425 let controls = class("showing", opts);
1426 let position = class("showing-position", opts);
1427 let frame = class("showing-frame", opts);
1428 let mut css = String::new();
1429
1430 // Hidden until something binds it, which is the whole argument above.
1431 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{controls} {{\n display: none;\n}}");
1432 // Block, and nothing about how the three sit in it. A button and a span are
1433 // inline already, so they make a row without this crate saying so, and
1434 // saying so is where `align-items` and a gap would follow -- both spacing,
1435 // both `makeover-geometry`'s, and `row_rules` refuses them for the same
1436 // reason.
1437 let _ = writeln!(
1438 css,
1439 "[data-ready] > .{controls} {{\n display: block;\n}}"
1440 );
1441
1442 // A child is in flow until the region is bound, and then only the current
1443 // one is. `.current` is a modifier for the reason `.chosen` and `.latched`
1444 // are: one name for the state, set by whoever knows it.
1445 let _ = writeln!(
1446 css,
1447 "[data-ready] > .{frame}:not(.current) {{\n display: none;\n}}"
1448 );
1449
1450 // Reads back one step. `picture-caption`'s rule and its reason.
1451 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{position} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1452
1453 css
1454}
1455
1456/// A time axis: the container, its gridlines and ruler, and the placed things.
1457///
1458/// `makeover-layout` 0.24.0's [`Track`](makeover_layout::Track), and the first
1459/// member here whose whole point is *position*. That makes the magnitude line
1460/// this crate keeps worth restating rather than assuming.
1461///
1462/// # Where the numbers come from
1463///
1464/// Every value that varies per item is a custom property the caller sets
1465/// inline, and every rule here reads one. `--track-at` and `--track-for` are
1466/// percentages of the span, which
1467/// [`Track::fraction`](makeover_layout::Track::fraction) computes once so three
1468/// renderers cannot disagree about it. Nothing here knows a pixel.
1469///
1470/// That is what lets the stylesheet stay static while the items move: an entry
1471/// carries `style="--track-at: 37.5%; --track-for: 4.166%"` and the rule below
1472/// turns it into a box. The alternative was emitting a rule per item, which is
1473/// a stylesheet that grows with the data.
1474///
1475/// **The height of the track is the app's**, not this crate's. 96 quarter-hour
1476/// slots at some slot height is a size, and a size is `makeover-geometry`'s
1477/// question -- the same refusal `figure_rules` and `placeholder_rules` make.
1478/// Percentages need a resolved height above them, so `.track` gets
1479/// `position: relative` and nothing else; the app says how tall a day is.
1480///
1481/// # Overlap
1482///
1483/// Two things at the same time is intrinsic to an axis and has no analogue in a
1484/// list. The description does not declare it -- `Placement::overlaps` derives it
1485/// from the times -- so what arrives here is a lane index and a lane count, and
1486/// the rule divides the width. A renderer that would rather stack them ignores
1487/// both properties and the defaults give it one full-width lane.
1488fn track_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1489 let track = class("track", opts);
1490 let slot = class("track-slot", opts);
1491 let tick = class("track-tick", opts);
1492 let entry = class("track-entry", opts);
1493 let mut css = String::new();
1494
1495 // The positioning context every entry resolves against, and the whole of
1496 // what this crate says about the container. No height: see the doc above.
1497 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{track} {{\n position: relative;\n}}");
1498
1499 // Gridlines and the ruler are the axis reading itself back, which is
1500 // `picture-caption` and `showing-position`'s claim: about the thing rather
1501 // than one of the things.
1502 //
1503 // `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` writes its
1504 // edge. A gridline is the one place a timeline would most naturally reach
1505 // for a hardcoded 1px, and a hardcoded 1px is this crate naming a size.
1506 let _ = writeln!(
1507 css,
1508 ".{slot} {{\n border-top: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1509 opts.border_width
1510 );
1511 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{tick} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1512
1513 // The one rule that does real work. Top and height are the placement;
1514 // left and width are the lane. Both lane properties default so an entry
1515 // that names neither is full width, which is the common case and the one a
1516 // renderer gets for free.
1517 let _ = writeln!(
1518 css,
1519 ".{entry} {{\n \
1520 position: absolute;\n \
1521 top: var(--track-at, 0%);\n \
1522 height: var(--track-for, 100%);\n \
1523 left: calc(var(--track-lane, 0) / var(--track-lanes, 1) * 100%);\n \
1524 width: calc(100% / var(--track-lanes, 1));\n\
1525 }}"
1526 );
1527
1528 css
1529}
1530
1531/// A region's stand-in, and the header of a table that can be reordered.
1532///
1533/// Both are 0.12.0 members and both are colour and affordance only, which is
1534/// where `figure_rules` landed after trying to emit a type scale. How much room
1535/// a stand-in gets is a size — goingson has the same one at three, as
1536/// `--compact`, `--dashboard` and `--padded` — and a size is
1537/// `makeover-geometry`'s question.
1538///
1539/// The caret is the one thing here that is neither colour nor affordance, and it
1540/// is a renderer's own expression rather than a value the description named:
1541/// `aria-sort` is what the table actually says, and this turns it into something
1542/// visible for everyone not using a screen reader. A terminal draws its own; an
1543/// immediate-mode painter draws its own.
1544fn state_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1545 let placeholder = class("placeholder", opts);
1546 let text = class("placeholder-text", opts);
1547 let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1548 let mut css = String::new();
1549
1550 let _ = writeln!(
1551 css,
1552 ".{placeholder} > .{text} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1553 );
1554 // Only the failure is toned. An empty list is the normal state of a new
1555 // install, and `Readiness::tone` is what says so.
1556 let _ = writeln!(
1557 css,
1558 ".{placeholder}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{text} {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1559 Tone::Danger.token()
1560 );
1561
1562 // A header that reorders the table is a control, and the pointer is the
1563 // only part of saying so that is not the app's own type and spacing.
1564 let _ = writeln!(
1565 css,
1566 ".{heading}[data-sortable] {{\n cursor: pointer;\n}}"
1567 );
1568 // The caret carries its own leading space, the way `makeover-tui` and
1569 // `makeover-immediate` both write `" \u{25B2}"`. It used to be emitted bare,
1570 // and both apps that adopted the vocabulary had to put the gap back in their
1571 // own stylesheets on the same afternoon -- each having to work out first that
1572 // app CSS outranks this crate's cascade layer, so adding the space the
1573 // obvious way, as `content`, silently wins over the glyph and leaves the
1574 // heading with no caret at all. A consumer should not have to know that, and
1575 // with the space emitted here there is nothing left for one to add.
1576 //
1577 // Three states, three tones, on the convention in wiki
1578 // `three-tone-convention`. A column in force is `content`; a column offering
1579 // to reorder and not doing it now is `content-secondary`, because it still
1580 // answers a press; a column that is not sortable emits no caret at all and
1581 // takes nothing. The idle arm used to hide its glyph and reserve the box,
1582 // which cost a reflow-free press and said nothing. It draws now, and the
1583 // reservation stops being a thing to get right.
1584 //
1585 // The glyph is `Sort::glyph`, escaped rather than written: a CSS `content`
1586 // string cannot carry the character literally through this file's own
1587 // escaping, and spelling it here as well would put the third copy back that
1588 // `makeover-layout` 0.27.5 exists to remove.
1589 let _ = writeln!(
1590 css,
1591 ".{heading}[data-sortable]::after \
1592 {{\n content: \" {}\";\n color: var(--content-secondary);\n}}",
1593 css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())
1594 );
1595 for direction in [Sort::Ascending, Sort::Descending] {
1596 let _ = writeln!(
1597 css,
1598 ".{heading}[aria-sort=\"{}\"]::after \
1599 {{\n content: \" {}\";\n color: var(--content);\n}}",
1600 direction.as_str(),
1601 css_escape(direction.glyph())
1602 );
1603 }
1604 css
1605}
1606
1607/// The frame a table sits in.
1608///
1609/// # Why this is a CSS table and not the grid the rest of the module assumes
1610///
1611/// A grid row needs `grid-template-columns`, which has to name every column in
1612/// order, so it cannot be written without knowing the columns. That is what
1613/// [`list::narrowing_css`] is for, and it works: goingson builds `tables.css` in
1614/// its own `build.rs` out of it, and nothing here changes that.
1615///
1616/// It does not work for a table a *description* produced. Those columns are
1617/// known at render time rather than at build time, and the rules would have to
1618/// travel with the markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs
1619/// `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` and so blocks the MNW server's standing plan to
1620/// drop it. The head is not an escape: a table swapped in by htmx after a
1621/// delete arrives as a fragment with no head at all.
1622///
1623/// A CSS table aligns its columns across rows knowing nothing about how many
1624/// there are, so there is no track list to emit and nothing per-table to carry.
1625/// The cost is that a described table cannot take a per-column fixed length,
1626/// which costs nothing today: [`Sizing`](list::Sizing) is looked up by column
1627/// name and a description carries no lengths to put in it, so every track a
1628/// described table could ask for is already content, fill or auto.
1629///
1630/// [`Priority`] hiding is unchanged in kind. It moves from a generated
1631/// `display: none` per dropped column to one rule per drop class, which is the
1632/// same fact addressed by class rather than by cutoff, and still never by
1633/// position.
1634fn table_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1635 let table = class("table", opts);
1636 let head = class("table-head", opts);
1637 let row = class("table-row", opts);
1638 let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1639 let cell = class("cell", opts);
1640 let mut css = String::new();
1641
1642 let _ = writeln!(
1643 css,
1644 ".{table} {{\n display: table;\n width: 100%;\n}}"
1645 );
1646 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{head},\n.{row} {{\n display: table-row;\n}}");
1647 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{heading},\n.{cell} {{\n display: table-cell;\n}}");
1648
1649 // A content column shrinks to what is in it. `width: 1%` is how a CSS table
1650 // is told that: auto layout hands the slack to the columns that asked for
1651 // room, and a column asking for almost none gets what it needs and no more.
1652 // The `nowrap` is what stops it being given less by wrapping.
1653 let _ = writeln!(
1654 css,
1655 ".{} {{\n white-space: nowrap;\n width: 1%;\n}}",
1656 class("cell-content", opts)
1657 );
1658
1659 // A fixed column has no length to be fixed to. The description carries none
1660 // and `Sizing` is not reachable from here, so it behaves as content: the
1661 // honest answer to a width nobody supplied, and the same one `Sizing::track`
1662 // gives it.
1663 let _ = writeln!(
1664 css,
1665 ".{} {{\n white-space: nowrap;\n}}",
1666 class("cell-fixed", opts)
1667 );
1668
1669 // Optional columns go at the narrowest class, secondary ones go with them,
1670 // which is the cutoff walk `kept_at` describes said as two media queries.
1671 // Essential columns have no rule at all, because never dropping is what not
1672 // being mentioned already means.
1673 for (size, drops) in [
1674 (
1675 SizeClass::Compact,
1676 &["cell-drops-first", "cell-drops-next"][..],
1677 ),
1678 (SizeClass::Medium, &["cell-drops-first"][..]),
1679 ] {
1680 let selectors: Vec<String> = drops
1681 .iter()
1682 .map(|drop| format!(".{}", class(drop, opts)))
1683 .collect();
1684 css.push_str(&gated(
1685 Some(&size.media_condition()),
1686 &format!("{} {{\n display: none;\n}}\n", selectors.join(",\n")),
1687 ));
1688 }
1689
1690 // What is inside a cell, which the table side could not say until
1691 // makeover-layout 0.14.0. Every cell was one `.cell` and one content
1692 // colour, so a button in a cell was painted as text -- the drift
1693 // `RowPart::intent` has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented
1694 // for nothing here.
1695 //
1696 // The colour goes on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell`, and that
1697 // placement is the whole fix. On the container it would cascade into the
1698 // tokens and the controls sitting beside the text, which is the bug said
1699 // in one rule; on the part that is text, it reaches text and stops.
1700 for part in [
1701 CellPart::Value,
1702 CellPart::Tokens,
1703 CellPart::Actions,
1704 CellPart::Link,
1705 ] {
1706 // Three of the four inherit, each for its own reason: a token carries
1707 // its own tone, an action is a control rather than text, and a link
1708 // takes the action colour from the anchor it is. `CellPart::intent`
1709 // says so by answering with the intent inheriting already gives, and
1710 // pinning that would be louder than saying nothing.
1711 //
1712 // Written as a skip-list rather than as a match on Value, so a member
1713 // added upstream gets its intent emitted rather than being silently
1714 // dropped. That is the same trade `part_class`'s fallback makes: land
1715 // plainly, never land as nothing.
1716 if !matches!(part, CellPart::Tokens | CellPart::Actions | CellPart::Link) {
1717 let _ = writeln!(
1718 css,
1719 ".{} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
1720 class(cell_part_class(part), opts),
1721 part.intent()
1722 );
1723 }
1724 }
1725
1726 css
1727}
1728
1729/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
1730///
1731/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
1732/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
1733/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
1734#[must_use]
1735pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1736 let mut css = String::new();
1737 css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
1738 css.push_str(&link_rules(opts));
1739 css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
1740 css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
1741 css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
1742 css.push_str(&run_rules(opts));
1743 css.push_str(&progress_rules(opts));
1744 css.push_str(&figure_rules(opts));
1745 css.push_str(&picture_rules(opts));
1746 css.push_str(&showing_rules(opts));
1747 css.push_str(&track_rules(opts));
1748 css.push_str(&state_rules(opts));
1749 css.push_str(&table_rules(opts));
1750 css.push_str(&facet::facet_rules(opts));
1751 css.push_str(&form::editor_rules(opts));
1752 css.push_str(&form::suggestion_rules(opts));
1753 css.push_str(&form::unit_rules(opts));
1754 css
1755}
1756
1757/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, in
1758/// [`CSS_LAYER`], under a generated-file banner.
1759///
1760/// The banner sits outside the layer, because a comment participates in no
1761/// cascade and a reader opening the file should see what it is before seeing
1762/// an at-rule.
1763#[must_use]
1764pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1765 format!(
1766 "/* Generated by makeover-webview from makeover-layout. Do not edit.\n \
1767 Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n \
1768 them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout.\n\n \
1769 Everything below is in the `{CSS_LAYER}` cascade layer. Declare the\n \
1770 order once in your own stylesheet, or this layer's position is decided\n \
1771 by whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:\n\n \
1772 @layer {CSS_LAYER}, base, components, responsive; */\n{}",
1773 in_css_layer(&format!(
1774 ":root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
1775 bevel_properties(opts),
1776 depth_rules(opts),
1777 component_rules(opts)
1778 ))
1779 )
1780}
1781
1782#[cfg(test)]
1783mod tests {
1784 use super::*;
1785 use makeover_layout::Edge;
1786
1787 #[test]
1788 fn every_fallback_class_is_one_a_checker_knows_about() {
1789 // The obligation ROW_PART_CLASSES carries, for the same reason: a class
1790 // this crate can write and the vocabulary list does not carry is
1791 // invisible to the dead-vocabulary seal and to the overlap check both.
1792 for fallback in [
1793 Fallback::Wrap,
1794 Fallback::Stack,
1795 Fallback::Shed,
1796 Fallback::Menu,
1797 ] {
1798 assert!(
1799 RUN_CLASSES.contains(&fallback_class(fallback)),
1800 "{fallback:?} is missing from RUN_CLASSES"
1801 );
1802 }
1803 let names = crate::vocabulary::names(&Emit::default());
1804 for name in RUN_CLASSES {
1805 assert!(names.contains(*name), "{name} is not in the vocabulary");
1806 }
1807 }
1808
1809 #[test]
1810 fn a_run_gives_every_member_a_floor_it_cannot_be_squeezed_below() {
1811 // The whole of what stops the overlap, and it is not a fallback: it
1812 // applies to every run whatever the group declared. flexbox's default
1813 // min-width is auto, which lets an item be compressed below its own
1814 // content in a nowrap row, and that is how a toolbar is drawn over a
1815 // tab strip even with nothing out of flow.
1816 let css = run_rules(&Emit::default());
1817 assert!(css.contains(".run > * {\n min-width: min-content;\n}"));
1818 // No number anywhere in it. The minimum is derived by the browser from
1819 // what the members contain, which is the ruling's own requirement.
1820 assert!(!css.contains("px"));
1821 assert!(!css.contains("rem"));
1822 assert!(!css.contains("@media"));
1823 }
1824
1825 #[test]
1826 fn room_is_never_asked_of_the_viewport() {
1827 // The 913 case: a window in SizeClass::Expanded holding a group out of
1828 // room. A viewport query answers about the window and would be wrong
1829 // about the group, which is why the table's @media walk is not the
1830 // precedent this follows.
1831 let css = run_rules(&Emit::default());
1832 for size in [SizeClass::Compact, SizeClass::Medium] {
1833 assert!(!css.contains(&size.media_condition()));
1834 }
1835 }
1836
1837 #[test]
1838 fn every_fallback_lands_as_a_class_and_an_unknown_one_lands_plainly() {
1839 let css = run_rules(&Emit::default());
1840 for fallback in [
1841 Fallback::Wrap,
1842 Fallback::Stack,
1843 Fallback::Shed,
1844 Fallback::Menu,
1845 ] {
1846 let class = fallback_class(fallback);
1847 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{class} {{")), "{class} unemitted");
1848 }
1849 // Stack is the one that also says what a member does with the line it
1850 // took, which is what separates it from wrapping.
1851 assert!(css.contains(".run-stack > * {\n flex: 1 1 max-content;\n}"));
1852 }
1853
1854 #[test]
1855 fn the_emitted_bevel_matches_what_the_apps_already_hand_write() {
1856 // Balanced Breakfast's styles.css, verbatim. Adoption has to be a
1857 // deletion, not a redesign, or nobody will take it.
1858 let opts = Emit::default();
1859 assert_eq!(
1860 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts),
1861 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-light), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-dark)"
1862 );
1863 assert_eq!(
1864 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Inset, &opts),
1865 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-dark), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-light)"
1866 );
1867 }
1868
1869 #[test]
1870 fn no_colour_ever_reaches_the_output() {
1871 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1872 assert!(!css.contains('#'), "a hex literal escaped into the CSS");
1873 assert!(
1874 !css.contains("rgb"),
1875 "a colour function escaped into the CSS"
1876 );
1877 // Every colour is named, never resolved.
1878 assert!(css.contains("var(--surface-raised)"));
1879 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-light)"));
1880 }
1881
1882 #[test]
1883 fn a_well_falls_back_through_css_rather_than_through_rust() {
1884 assert_eq!(
1885 fill_var(Fill::Well),
1886 "var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"
1887 );
1888 // Nothing else needs one.
1889 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Raised), "var(--surface-raised)");
1890 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Page), "var(--surface-page)");
1891 }
1892
1893 #[test]
1894 fn raised_and_well_do_not_collapse_onto_each_other() {
1895 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
1896 assert!(css.contains(".raised {"));
1897 assert!(css.contains(".well {"));
1898 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"));
1899 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"));
1900 }
1901
1902 /// The cast shadow is composed here from the tone `makeover` derives, so
1903 /// neither crate has to hold the other's numbers.
1904 ///
1905 /// It is a `:root` property and deliberately not a depth class. There is no
1906 /// `Depth::Overlay` in the description layer, and adding one would be a
1907 /// claim about what a screen means rather than about how it is painted;
1908 /// until something asks for it, a consumer names the property on the rule
1909 /// for the menu or the toast it already has.
1910 #[test]
1911 fn the_cast_shadow_is_a_root_property_not_a_depth() {
1912 let css = bevel_properties(&Emit::default());
1913 assert!(css.contains("--elevation-overlay:"));
1914 assert!(css.contains("var(--elevation)"));
1915 assert!(
1916 !depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("elevation"),
1917 "elevation is not a depth class"
1918 );
1919 }
1920
1921 #[test]
1922 fn the_cascade_carries_the_pressed_state() {
1923 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
1924 // The one thing this renderer gets free that the other two resolve by
1925 // hand, eighteen call sites deep in audiofiles' case. Asserted on a
1926 // named surface: pressing belongs to the control, not to the depth.
1927 assert!(css.contains(".card:active {"));
1928 assert!(css.contains(".button:active {"));
1929 }
1930
1931 #[test]
1932 fn the_depth_class_is_a_surface_and_not_a_control() {
1933 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
1934 // The static surface the vocabulary was missing. Sixteen goingson
1935 // elements wore .card and cancelled its hover and press to get this,
1936 // because a raised object that is not pressable had no other spelling.
1937 for state in [":hover", ":active", ":focus-visible", ":disabled"] {
1938 assert!(
1939 !css.contains(&format!(".raised{state}")),
1940 "the depth class claimed {state}: {css}"
1941 );
1942 }
1943 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"), "still raised: {css}");
1944 }
1945
1946 #[test]
1947 fn pressing_moves_the_fill_and_not_only_the_edge() {
1948 // The decision-1 guard, and the regression that mattered: emitting the
1949 // bevel flip alone is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
1950 // var(--surface-sunken)` on .btn, .card and .tag/.badge alike, so none
1951 // of the three could be deleted.
1952 let pressed = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1953 assert!(pressed.contains(".button:active {"));
1954 assert!(
1955 pressed.contains("background: var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"),
1956 "pressed dropped its fill: {pressed}"
1957 );
1958 assert!(pressed.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
1959 }
1960
1961 #[test]
1962 fn pressed_takes_its_fill_from_the_description_not_from_the_app() {
1963 // goingson presses to --surface-sunken. The description says a pressed
1964 // raised region reads as a well, and makeover says outright that
1965 // surface-sunken cannot serve as one, so the app is the thing that
1966 // moves.
1967 //
1968 // Scoped to the pressed rules rather than to the whole sheet: since
1969 // makeover-layout 0.3.0 an unchosen tab is legitimately
1970 // --surface-sunken, so the token appearing somewhere in the output no
1971 // longer means the app's choice leaked in.
1972 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1973 let mut checked = 0;
1974 for rule in css.split("}\n") {
1975 if !rule.contains(":active") {
1976 continue;
1977 }
1978 checked += 1;
1979 assert!(
1980 !rule.contains("surface-sunken"),
1981 "a pressed rule took the app's fill: {rule}"
1982 );
1983 }
1984 assert!(checked > 0, "no pressed rules found to check");
1985 assert_eq!(
1986 Depth::Raised.pressed().fill(),
1987 Some(Fill::Well),
1988 "the description changed under us"
1989 );
1990 }
1991
1992 #[test]
1993 fn the_whole_stylesheet_is_emitted_in_the_family_layer() {
1994 // The point of 0.11.0. Unlayered normal declarations outrank every
1995 // named layer, so an app declaring `@layer base, components` loses
1996 // every rule it owns to this file until this file is layered too.
1997 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1998 assert!(css.contains(&format!("@layer {CSS_LAYER} {{")));
1999
2000 // Exactly one layer block, and nothing outside it but the banner.
2001 assert_eq!(css.matches("@layer").count(), 2, "banner names it once");
2002 let opened = css.find("@layer makeover {").expect("layer opens");
2003 for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
2004 let before_layer = css.lines().take(i).map(str::len).sum::<usize>() < opened;
2005 if before_layer || line.is_empty() {
2006 continue;
2007 }
2008 assert!(
2009 line.starts_with(" ") || line == "}" || line.starts_with(" "),
2010 "line outside the layer: {line:?}"
2011 );
2012 }
2013 }
2014
2015 #[test]
2016 fn the_generated_sheet_carries_no_trailing_whitespace() {
2017 // A checked-in generated file that a formatter wants to rewrite is a
2018 // diff every time somebody saves it.
2019 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2020 for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
2021 assert_eq!(line, line.trim_end(), "trailing whitespace on line {i}");
2022 }
2023 }
2024
2025 #[test]
2026 fn the_banner_tells_an_app_how_to_order_the_layer() {
2027 // Without a declared order the layer's position depends on which
2028 // generated file the browser sees first, which is not a contract.
2029 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2030 assert!(css.contains("@layer makeover, base, components, responsive;"));
2031 // And the banner is outside the layer, not a rule inside it.
2032 assert!(css.starts_with("/* Generated by makeover-webview"));
2033 }
2034
2035 #[test]
2036 fn a_primitive_owns_every_state_it_implies() {
2037 // The whole point of 0.10.0. Anything emitting a hover rule owes the
2038 // other three, or the consuming app supplies them by out-specifying a
2039 // rule it does not own: 19 such rules in goingson, 21 in the MNW
2040 // server, and three focus rings that do not match.
2041 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2042 for selector in ["button", "card", "chip", "tab", "segment", "toggle"] {
2043 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:hover {{")), "{selector}");
2044 assert!(
2045 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:active {{")),
2046 "{selector}"
2047 );
2048 assert!(
2049 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:focus-visible {{")),
2050 "{selector} has no focus ring"
2051 );
2052 assert!(
2053 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:disabled,")),
2054 "{selector} has no disabled state"
2055 );
2056 }
2057 }
2058
2059 #[test]
2060 fn a_field_takes_focus_and_refuses_input_without_taking_a_hover() {
2061 // A text field does not light up under the pointer, so it gets the two
2062 // states it has and not the two it does not.
2063 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2064 assert!(css.contains(".field:focus-visible {"));
2065 assert!(css.contains(".field:disabled,"));
2066 assert!(!css.contains(".field:hover {"));
2067 assert!(!css.contains(".field:active {"));
2068 }
2069
2070 #[test]
2071 fn disabled_is_emitted_after_hover_so_source_order_settles_it() {
2072 // Every one of these selectors is specificity (0,2,0), so nothing but
2073 // order decides which wins. A disabled button taking the hover fill is
2074 // the exact bug goingson's `.button:disabled:hover` was written to fix,
2075 // and the reason it had to reach (0,3,0) to do it.
2076 let css = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
2077 let hover = css.find(":hover").expect("hover");
2078 let active = css.find(":active").expect("active");
2079 let focus = css.find(":focus-visible").expect("focus");
2080 let disabled = css.find(":disabled").expect("disabled");
2081 assert!(hover < active && active < focus && focus < disabled);
2082
2083 // And it restores the surface, or the hover fill survives underneath.
2084 let tail = &css[disabled..];
2085 assert!(tail.contains("background: var(--surface-raised)"));
2086 }
2087
2088 #[test]
2089 fn a_disabled_state_reaches_things_that_cannot_be_disabled() {
2090 // `:disabled` matches form elements only, and a chip is a div. Keying
2091 // on the ARIA attribute too is the pattern the invalid field already
2092 // set: one fact, read by the styling and the accessibility tree alike.
2093 let css = disabled_rule("chip", Depth::Raised);
2094 assert!(css.contains(".chip:disabled,"));
2095 assert!(css.contains(".chip[aria-disabled=\"true\"]"));
2096 assert!(css.contains("cursor: not-allowed"));
2097 }
2098
2099 #[test]
2100 fn the_focus_ring_does_not_disturb_the_bevel_it_lands_on() {
2101 // `outline` has its own property, so unlike the invalid ring there is
2102 // no bevel to restate beside it and nothing to keep in agreement.
2103 let opts = Emit::default();
2104 let css = focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts);
2105 assert!(css.contains("outline: 2px solid var(--focus-ring)"));
2106 assert!(!css.contains("box-shadow"), "the ring restated the bevel");
2107 }
2108
2109 #[test]
2110 fn a_well_takes_the_ring_inside_and_a_raised_surface_outside() {
2111 // One ring, placed by depth. The offset comes off `Depth::bevel` and
2112 // not off a per-component choice, which is what gave three apps three
2113 // different rings.
2114 let opts = Emit::default();
2115 assert!(focus_rule("field", Depth::Well, &opts).contains("outline-offset: calc(-1 * 2px)"));
2116 assert!(focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
2117 // Nothing to sit inside of, so it sits outside.
2118 assert!(focus_rule("badge", Depth::Sunken, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
2119
2120 // And the ring is not the bevel. Reusing border_width emitted a 1px
2121 // ring that every consumer had already overridden.
2122 assert_ne!(opts.focus_width, opts.border_width);
2123 }
2124
2125 #[test]
2126 fn hover_is_gated_on_capability_and_the_keyboard_path_is_not() {
2127 // goingson's section 60 exists only to take back the hover state this
2128 // crate handed it. Gating at the source is what deletes that section
2129 // in all three apps rather than having each fight for it.
2130 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2131 let condition = format!("@media {}", Density::Pointer.media_condition());
2132 assert!(css.contains(&condition));
2133
2134 // What is gated is every hover state the surfaces carry. The row's
2135 // actions used to be the other half of this test and are not gated any
2136 // more, because they are not hidden any more: a rule that reveals
2137 // nothing needs no capability answer.
2138 let gated: Vec<&str> = css.lines().filter(|line| line.contains(":hover")).collect();
2139 assert!(!gated.is_empty(), "{css}");
2140 for line in gated {
2141 let indent = line.len() - line.trim_start().len();
2142 assert!(indent > 4, "an ungated hover rule: {line}");
2143 }
2144 assert!(!css.contains(".row:hover"), "{css}");
2145 }
2146
2147 #[test]
2148 fn the_capability_answer_is_asked_for_and_not_assumed() {
2149 // Both halves come from the crates that own them. If `makeover-touch`
2150 // ever says a fingertip has hover, this stops gating on its own.
2151 assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact));
2152 assert!(Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Pointer, SizeClass::Compact));
2153 assert_eq!(hover_condition(), Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition()));
2154
2155 // And the size class passed to that call is not a claim about width.
2156 assert!(Affordance::Hover.reads_density());
2157 for size in [SizeClass::Compact, SizeClass::Medium, SizeClass::Expanded] {
2158 assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, size));
2159 }
2160 }
2161
2162 #[test]
2163 fn hover_resolves_against_the_token_makeover_already_derives() {
2164 let css = interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
2165 assert!(css.contains(".card:hover {"));
2166 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--hover-surface)"));
2167 // Not the app's choice, which was --surface-overlay.
2168 assert!(!css.contains("surface-overlay"));
2169 }
2170
2171 #[test]
2172 fn a_badge_gets_no_edge_and_no_fill() {
2173 // Decision 2, and the one visible redesign in phase A. Token::Badge is
2174 // Flat: an edge on a label says it can be pressed.
2175 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
2176 let badge = css
2177 .lines()
2178 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".badge {"))
2179 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2180 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2181 .join("\n");
2182 assert!(!badge.contains("box-shadow"), "badge kept an edge: {badge}");
2183 assert!(!badge.contains("background"), "badge kept a fill: {badge}");
2184 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(false), Depth::Flat);
2185 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(true), Depth::Flat);
2186 }
2187
2188 #[test]
2189 fn a_badge_carries_a_tone_and_neutral_is_the_bare_class() {
2190 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
2191 // Neutral is the absence of a status, not a status named "none".
2192 assert!(css.contains(".badge {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
2193 assert!(!css.contains("data-tone=\"content-muted\""));
2194 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
2195 assert!(
2196 css.contains(&format!(".badge[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
2197 "missing tone {tone}"
2198 );
2199 assert!(css.contains(&format!("color: var(--{tone})")));
2200 }
2201 }
2202
2203 #[test]
2204 fn a_chip_is_raised_and_latches_into_a_well() {
2205 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
2206 assert!(css.contains(".chip {"));
2207 assert!(css.contains(".chip.latched {"));
2208 assert!(css.contains(".chip:active {"));
2209 // The whole difference from a badge: it answers a click.
2210 assert!(Token::Chip { removable: false }.interactive());
2211 assert!(!Token::Badge.interactive());
2212 }
2213
2214 #[test]
2215 fn only_a_tab_comes_forward_when_chosen() {
2216 // The folder semantic. Collapsing the three selectors would lose it.
2217 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
2218 assert!(css.contains(".tab.chosen {"));
2219 assert!(css.contains(".segment.chosen {"));
2220 assert!(css.contains(".toggle.chosen {"));
2221 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.chosen(), Depth::Raised);
2222 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2223 assert_eq!(Selector::Toggle.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2224
2225 let tab = css
2226 .lines()
2227 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".tab.chosen {"))
2228 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2229 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2230 .join("\n");
2231 assert!(
2232 tab.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"),
2233 "tab was held in: {tab}"
2234 );
2235 }
2236
2237 #[test]
2238 fn an_unchosen_tab_recedes_without_looking_picked() {
2239 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
2240 // Recessed by colour and given no edge. An edge would make every option
2241 // look picked; flat would leave the chosen one nothing to come forward
2242 // from, which is the gap makeover-layout 0.3.0 closed.
2243 assert!(
2244 css.contains(".tab {\n background: var(--surface-sunken);\n}"),
2245 "unchosen tab is not recessed: {css}"
2246 );
2247 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.unchosen(), Depth::Sunken);
2248 assert!(css.contains(".tab:hover {"));
2249 }
2250
2251 #[test]
2252 fn a_segment_stands_up_so_the_chosen_one_can_be_held_in() {
2253 // The inverse of the tab, and why the three selectors are not one
2254 // member with a flag.
2255 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
2256 assert!(css.contains(".segment {\n background: var(--surface-raised);"));
2257 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.unchosen(), Depth::Raised);
2258 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2259 }
2260
2261 #[test]
2262 fn a_rows_actions_are_shown_at_rest() {
2263 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2264
2265 // The hover reveal is gone, and with it every escape it needed. What
2266 // it hid was hidden from pointer users alone, who are the ones
2267 // scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
2268 assert!(!css.contains("opacity"), "{css}");
2269 assert!(!css.contains("pointer-events"), "{css}");
2270 assert!(!css.contains(":hover"), "{css}");
2271 assert!(!css.contains(":focus-within"), "{css}");
2272
2273 // Nor is it hidden any other way. `display: none` would reflow the row
2274 // and `visibility: hidden` would take the actions out of the focus
2275 // order; the point is that neither is reached for.
2276 assert!(!css.contains("display: none"), "{css}");
2277 assert!(!css.contains("visibility:"), "{css}");
2278 }
2279
2280 #[test]
2281 fn a_figures_tone_lands_on_the_delta_when_there_is_one() {
2282 // 0.13.0. The delta is the part that reads as good or bad; the number
2283 // itself is an ordinary fact. A figure with no delta has nowhere else to
2284 // put the colour, so the value takes it, and `:has` is what lets one
2285 // attribute mean both without the emitter choosing an element.
2286 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2287
2288 assert!(
2289 css.contains(".figure[data-tone=\"success\"] > .figure-change"),
2290 "{css}"
2291 );
2292 assert!(
2293 css.contains(
2294 ".figure[data-tone=\"success\"]:not(:has(> .figure-change)) > .figure-value"
2295 ),
2296 "{css}"
2297 );
2298 // The caption is the noun and never takes the tone.
2299 assert!(
2300 !css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] > .figure-caption"),
2301 "{css}"
2302 );
2303 }
2304
2305 #[test]
2306 fn the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits() {
2307 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2308 assert!(css.contains(".row-primary {\n color: var(--content);"));
2309 assert!(css.contains(".row-secondary {\n color: var(--content-secondary);"));
2310 assert!(css.contains(".row-meta {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
2311 // Actions carry controls, not text. Pinning the colour it would inherit
2312 // anyway is louder than saying nothing.
2313 assert!(!css.contains(".row-actions {\n color:"));
2314 }
2315
2316 #[test]
2317 fn the_token_strip_takes_no_colour_of_its_own() {
2318 // makeover-layout 0.9.0. A token carries its own tone, so a colour on
2319 // the strip would be a rule fighting the things sitting in it -- the
2320 // same reasoning as actions, reached for a different reason.
2321 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2322 assert!(!css.contains(".row-tokens {\n color:"));
2323 }
2324
2325 #[test]
2326 fn an_unknown_row_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
2327 // What `#[non_exhaustive]` bought and what it cost. `part_class` can no
2328 // longer be exhaustive, so a member added upstream lands as a bare
2329 // class with no rule instead of stopping the build. Asserting the
2330 // fallback exists is what keeps it from being written as `unreachable!`
2331 // by someone who reads the match as closed.
2332 assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Tokens), "row-tokens");
2333 assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Meta), "row-meta");
2334 }
2335
2336 #[test]
2337 fn a_link_takes_the_action_colour_the_theme_actually_defines() {
2338 // `--action-primary` shipped here for months and no theme has ever
2339 // defined it, so every `.link` dropped its colour declaration outright
2340 // and fell back to inherited text. Nothing caught it because the sheet
2341 // is valid CSS either way; MNW's no-undefined-token lint is what found
2342 // it, 2026-08-14. The hover arm two lines below was always `--action-hover`,
2343 // which is what makes the typo legible in hindsight.
2344 let css = link_rules(&Emit::default());
2345 assert!(css.contains("color: var(--action);"));
2346 assert!(!css.contains("--action-primary"));
2347 assert!(css.contains("color: var(--action-hover);"));
2348 }
2349
2350 #[test]
2351 fn the_progress_trough_is_a_well() {
2352 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
2353 assert!(css.contains(".progress {"));
2354 assert!(css.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
2355 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {"));
2356 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--action)"));
2357 // A bare `.fill` would catch things that have nothing to do with
2358 // progress once the sheet lands unprefixed.
2359 assert!(!css.contains("> .fill "));
2360 }
2361
2362 #[test]
2363 fn a_progress_bar_can_carry_a_tone_and_defaults_to_action() {
2364 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
2365 // Untoned is --action, not Tone::Neutral's content-muted: a bar with no
2366 // status is still reporting progress, and muted would read as disabled.
2367 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {\n background: var(--action);"));
2368 assert!(!css.contains("progress-fill {\n color: var(--content-muted)"));
2369 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
2370 assert!(
2371 css.contains(&format!(".progress > .progress-fill[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
2372 "missing progress tone {tone}"
2373 );
2374 }
2375 // goingson's two live cases, which is why the tones are emitted at all.
2376 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] {\n background: var(--success);"));
2377 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n background: var(--danger);"));
2378 }
2379
2380 #[test]
2381 fn no_scrollbar_track_is_emitted() {
2382 // Decision 3's negative half. It was on the phase A list and came off;
2383 // this is what stops it drifting back in.
2384 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2385 assert!(!css.contains("scrollbar"));
2386 assert!(!css.contains("::-webkit"));
2387 }
2388
2389 #[test]
2390 fn an_invalid_field_is_ringed_without_being_lit() {
2391 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2392 assert!(css.contains(".field {"));
2393 // The ARIA attribute, not a class: one fact, read by both the visual
2394 // and the accessible state, so they cannot drift.
2395 assert!(css.contains(".field[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {"));
2396 assert!(!css.contains(".field.invalid"));
2397 // A flat ring: this edge says "wrong", and a two-tone bevel would have
2398 // it say "raised" at the same time.
2399 assert!(css.contains("0 0 0 1px var(--danger)"));
2400 }
2401
2402 #[test]
2403 fn an_invalid_field_keeps_the_well_underneath_it() {
2404 // box-shadow is not additive. A lone ring replaces the bevel and drops
2405 // the well out from under the field, which is what this emitted before
2406 // 0.5.0 and is the whole reason the rule composes.
2407 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2408 let invalid = css
2409 .lines()
2410 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".field[aria-invalid"))
2411 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2412 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2413 .join("\n");
2414 assert!(
2415 invalid.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"),
2416 "the well was dropped: {invalid}"
2417 );
2418 assert!(invalid.contains("var(--danger)"));
2419 }
2420
2421 #[test]
2422 fn button_and_card_come_out_identical_by_construction() {
2423 // The duplication phase A deletes. They are the same composition, so
2424 // the only honest way to emit both is from one call.
2425 let opts = Emit::default();
2426 let css = surface_rules(&opts);
2427 assert_eq!(
2428 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised),
2429 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised)
2430 );
2431 assert!(css.contains(".button {"));
2432 assert!(css.contains(".card {"));
2433 assert_eq!(
2434 interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default()).replace("button", "card"),
2435 interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default())
2436 );
2437 }
2438
2439 #[test]
2440 fn a_prefix_reaches_the_component_classes_too() {
2441 let opts = Emit {
2442 class_prefix: "mo-",
2443 ..Emit::default()
2444 };
2445 let css = stylesheet(&opts);
2446 for name in [
2447 "mo-button",
2448 "mo-card",
2449 "mo-field",
2450 "mo-badge",
2451 "mo-chip",
2452 "mo-tab",
2453 "mo-row-primary",
2454 "mo-progress",
2455 "mo-progress-fill",
2456 ] {
2457 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}")), "unprefixed: {name}");
2458 }
2459 // The bare names must be gone entirely, or a prefixed build still
2460 // collides with the app's own stylesheet.
2461 assert!(!css.contains(".button {"));
2462 assert!(!css.contains(".card {"));
2463 assert!(!css.contains(".badge {"));
2464 }
2465
2466 #[test]
2467 fn the_class_a_renderer_puts_on_an_option_is_the_one_the_rules_key_off() {
2468 // `option_class` is the contract a screen renderer writes markup
2469 // against, and the rules below are the other half of it. They come off
2470 // one mapping now, so this asserts the mapping is the one that reaches
2471 // the stylesheet rather than that two lists still agree.
2472 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2473 for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
2474 let name = option_class(selector);
2475 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name} {{")), "{name}: {css}");
2476 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}.chosen {{")), "{name}: {css}");
2477 }
2478 assert_eq!(option_class(Selector::Tabs), "tab");
2479 }
2480
2481 #[test]
2482 fn the_caret_brings_its_own_gap_and_is_the_glyph_the_description_names() {
2483 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2484
2485 // The space is inside the glyph, which is what the other two renderers
2486 // write. Emitted bare, every consumer has to add it back, and the
2487 // obvious way to add it -- `content` in an app stylesheet, which is
2488 // unlayered and so outranks this sheet -- deletes the caret instead.
2489 assert!(css.contains("content: \" \\25B2\";"), "{css}");
2490 assert!(css.contains("content: \" \\25BC\";"), "{css}");
2491 assert!(!css.contains("content: \"\\2"), "{css}");
2492
2493 // The arrows this renderer used to draw alone are gone. Composition
2494 // rather than agreement: the glyph comes from `Sort::glyph`, so a
2495 // fourth spelling cannot appear here without appearing everywhere.
2496 assert!(!css.contains("2191") && !css.contains("2193"), "{css}");
2497 assert!(css.contains(&css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())), "{css}");
2498
2499 // Three states, three tones. An idle sortable heading draws its caret
2500 // now rather than reserving a hidden box for it, so there is no
2501 // visibility to order and no reflow left to guard against; what
2502 // separates the states is the colour, and the sorted arms come after
2503 // the idle one because the specificity is the same.
2504 let idle = css
2505 .find(".table-heading[data-sortable]::after")
2506 .expect("the idle caret is emitted");
2507 let sorted = css
2508 .find(".table-heading[aria-sort=\"ascending\"]::after")
2509 .expect("the ascending caret is emitted");
2510 assert!(idle < sorted, "{css}");
2511 assert!(
2512 css[idle..sorted].contains("color: var(--content-secondary);"),
2513 "{css}"
2514 );
2515 assert!(css[sorted..].contains("color: var(--content);"), "{css}");
2516 assert!(!css.contains("visibility: hidden;"), "{css}");
2517 }
2518
2519 #[test]
2520 fn a_destructive_button_has_somewhere_for_its_tone_to_land() {
2521 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2522
2523 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
2524 assert!(
2525 css.contains(&format!(".button[data-tone=\"{}\"]", tone.token())),
2526 "{css}"
2527 );
2528 }
2529 // Colour, not a fill. A red surface is an app's decision about emphasis.
2530 assert!(!css.contains(".button[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n background"));
2531 }
2532
2533 #[test]
2534 fn a_described_list_is_not_a_bulleted_list() {
2535 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2536 assert!(css.contains(".list {\n list-style: none;"), "{css}");
2537 }
2538
2539 #[test]
2540 fn a_table_lays_itself_out_without_being_told_its_columns() {
2541 // The whole point of the CSS table. A described table's columns are
2542 // known at render time, so anything the stylesheet has to be told about
2543 // them would have to travel with the markup.
2544 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2545
2546 assert!(css.contains(".table {\n display: table;"), "{css}");
2547 assert!(css.contains("display: table-row;"), "{css}");
2548 assert!(css.contains("display: table-cell;"), "{css}");
2549 assert!(!css.contains("grid-template-columns"), "{css}");
2550 }
2551
2552 #[test]
2553 fn a_control_in_a_cell_is_not_painted_as_text() {
2554 // The point of makeover-layout 0.14.0's CellPart, and the table-side
2555 // twin of `the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits`
2556 // above. One `.cell` and one content colour meant a button in a cell
2557 // inherited it.
2558 let css = table_rules(&Emit::default());
2559
2560 assert!(
2561 css.contains(".cell-value {\n color: var(--content);"),
2562 "{css}"
2563 );
2564 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-actions {\n color:"), "{css}");
2565 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-tokens {\n color:"), "{css}");
2566 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-link {\n color:"), "{css}");
2567
2568 // The colour is on the part that is text, never on the container. On
2569 // `.cell` it would cascade into the three parts that are not text,
2570 // which is the bug written as one rule.
2571 assert!(!css.contains(".cell {\n color:"), "{css}");
2572 }
2573
2574 #[test]
2575 fn an_unknown_cell_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
2576 // `part_class`'s obligation, taken on for the table side too. CellPart
2577 // is `#[non_exhaustive]`, so a member added upstream must land as a
2578 // bare class rather than as a build that stops.
2579 assert_eq!(cell_part_class(CellPart::Value), "cell-value");
2580 assert_eq!(cell_part_class(CellPart::Actions), "cell-actions");
2581 }
2582
2583 #[test]
2584 fn a_column_drops_by_its_priority_and_never_by_its_position() {
2585 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2586
2587 // Optional goes at the narrowest class and secondary goes with it,
2588 // which is `kept_at`'s cutoff walk said as two queries.
2589 let compact = css
2590 .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Compact.media_condition()))
2591 .expect("a compact query");
2592 let medium = css
2593 .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Medium.media_condition()))
2594 .expect("a medium query");
2595 assert!(css[compact..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
2596 assert!(!css[medium..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
2597
2598 // Essential columns are never mentioned, because not being mentioned is
2599 // already what never dropping means.
2600 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-keeps"), "{css}");
2601
2602 // And nothing counts. `nth-child` is the bug the priority vocabulary
2603 // exists to end.
2604 assert!(!css.contains("nth-child"), "{css}");
2605 }
2606
2607 #[test]
2608 fn a_track_places_by_custom_property_and_never_by_a_size() {
2609 let css = track_rules(&Emit::default());
2610
2611 // Placement arrives from the caller, computed once by Track::fraction.
2612 // If either of these becomes a literal, three renderers have started
2613 // disagreeing about where 09:30 is.
2614 assert!(css.contains("top: var(--track-at"), "{css}");
2615 assert!(css.contains("height: var(--track-for"), "{css}");
2616
2617 // Overlap lanes default so an entry naming neither is full width.
2618 assert!(css.contains("--track-lane, 0"), "{css}");
2619 assert!(css.contains("--track-lanes, 1"), "{css}");
2620
2621 // The refusal that matters. A slot height here would be this crate
2622 // deciding how tall a quarter of an hour is, which is the thing
2623 // makeover-geometry owns and the reason `.track` gets no height at all.
2624 assert!(!css.contains("height: var(--track-slot"), "{css}");
2625 for size in ["px", "rem", "em", "vh"] {
2626 let bare = css
2627 .lines()
2628 .filter(|l| !l.contains("var(--"))
2629 .any(|l| l.contains(size));
2630 assert!(!bare, "track_rules named a {size} outside a var(): {css}");
2631 }
2632 }
2633
2634 #[test]
2635 fn a_relaxed_part_clamps_and_a_tight_one_says_nothing() {
2636 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2637 assert!(css.contains(".row-relaxed {"));
2638 assert!(css.contains("-webkit-line-clamp: 2;"));
2639 // The count is `Flow`'s, not this crate's. If the tier ever means three
2640 // lines, this fails here rather than in an app.
2641 assert!(css.contains(&format!("line-clamp: {};", Flow::Relaxed.lines())));
2642 // Tight gets no rule at all: one line is what a run already does, and a
2643 // class per part saying so is a declaration that changes nothing.
2644 assert!(!css.contains("row-tight"));
2645 assert_eq!(crate::list::flow_class(Flow::Relaxed), Some("row-relaxed"));
2646 assert_eq!(crate::list::flow_class(Flow::Tight), None);
2647 // Emitted, therefore checkable: an app's dead-vocabulary seal and the
2648 // overlap check both read `vocabulary::names`, so a class the renderer
2649 // can write and that list does not carry is invisible to both.
2650 assert!(crate::vocabulary::names(&Emit::default()).contains("row-relaxed"));
2651 }
2652
2653 #[test]
2654 fn the_whole_sheet_still_names_every_colour() {
2655 // The crate's founding property, asserted over the component layer and
2656 // not only the primitives.
2657 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2658 assert!(!css.contains('#'));
2659 assert!(!css.contains("rgb"));
2660 for line in css.lines() {
2661 // Declarations only: a selector or an at-rule can carry a colon of
2662 // its own (`:root`, `:hover`, `@media (hover: hover)`) and declares
2663 // nothing. Keyed on the trailing semicolon rather than on leading
2664 // indentation, which only ever worked as a proxy for nesting depth
2665 // and stopped when the sheet gained a cascade layer around it.
2666 let trimmed = line.trim();
2667 if !trimmed.ends_with(';') {
2668 continue;
2669 }
2670 let Some((_, value)) = trimmed.split_once(": ") else {
2671 continue;
2672 };
2673 if value.contains("var(--") {
2674 continue;
2675 }
2676 // Everything left has to be a keyword, a number or a
2677 // caller-supplied length, never a colour.
2678 //
2679 // The length arm is what the comment above always claimed and the
2680 // list never covered: `border_width` arrives from `Emit` and lands
2681 // bare in the focus ring's offset, where the bevel had only ever
2682 // used it inside an `inset` shadow.
2683 let opts = Emit::default();
2684 assert!(
2685 value.contains("inset")
2686 || value.contains(opts.border_width)
2687 || value.contains(opts.focus_width)
2688 // 0.12.0's two: a sortable header is a control and says so
2689 // with the pointer, and the caret is this renderer's own
2690 // expression of `aria-sort`. Neither is a colour, which is
2691 // what this test is actually about, and neither is a size,
2692 // which is the other thing this crate must not name. The
2693 // leading space inside the glyph is the same thing the other
2694 // two renderers write into theirs, so it is part of the
2695 // caret rather than spacing this crate decided on.
2696 || value
2697 .trim_start_matches('"')
2698 .trim_start()
2699 .starts_with("\\2")
2700 || matches!(
2701 value.trim_end_matches(';'),
2702 "0" | "1"
2703 | "none"
2704 | "auto"
2705 | "not-allowed"
2706 | "pointer"
2707 // The caret's reserved box. Visibility is presence,
2708 // not magnitude and not colour.
2709 | "hidden"
2710 | "visible"
2711 // The link's two signals. `underline` is a line and
2712 // `inherit` defers to whatever the app set, so
2713 // neither names a colour or a magnitude.
2714 | "underline"
2715 | "inherit"
2716 // The table frame. `display` is structure and not a
2717 // size; `nowrap` is what makes a content column
2718 // content. The two widths are the awkward pair and
2719 // they are still not sizes: `100%` is "all of
2720 // whatever you were given" and `1%` is the CSS
2721 // table idiom for "shrink to fit", which is a
2722 // behaviour spelled as a number because CSS has no
2723 // keyword for it. Neither names a magnitude, which
2724 // is the thing this crate leaves to
2725 // makeover-geometry.
2726 | "table"
2727 | "table-row"
2728 | "table-cell"
2729 | "nowrap"
2730 | "100%"
2731 | "1%"
2732 // The time axis, 0.42.0. `position` is the one
2733 // property whose whole job is where a thing sits,
2734 // which is exactly what this crate spent its life
2735 // refusing to say -- so it is worth being exact
2736 // about why these two are not that refusal
2737 // breaking.
2738 //
2739 // Neither names a magnitude. `relative` says the
2740 // track is what its entries resolve against, and
2741 // `absolute` says an entry is placed rather than
2742 // flowed. *Where* each entry lands is
2743 // `--track-at` and `--track-for`, custom
2744 // properties the caller sets from
2745 // `Track::fraction`, and they are skipped by the
2746 // `var(--` arm above like every other value this
2747 // crate refuses to decide.
2748 //
2749 // The rule that would break the refusal is a slot
2750 // height, and there is none: the track's height is
2751 // the app's, so the percentages have something to
2752 // resolve against and this crate still never says
2753 // how tall a day is.
2754 | "relative"
2755 | "absolute"
2756 // A run's five, 0.49.0. `flex`, `wrap` and
2757 // `center` are structure and alignment, the same
2758 // reading `table` gets: which way members are laid
2759 // out and how they line up, never how much of
2760 // anything.
2761 //
2762 // The two intrinsic keywords are the interesting
2763 // pair and they are the opposite of a size. A
2764 // magnitude is a number somebody chose;
2765 // `min-content` and `max-content` are the browser
2766 // being asked what the members themselves come to,
2767 // which is the derived minimum the room ruling
2768 // requires and the reason no breakpoint appears
2769 // anywhere in these rules. `1 1 max-content` is
2770 // grow, shrink and that basis, so its two digits
2771 // are ratios rather than lengths.
2772 | "flex"
2773 | "wrap"
2774 | "center"
2775 | "min-content"
2776 | "1 1 max-content"
2777 // A picture's three, 0.36.0. `block` is structure
2778 // for the reason `table` is: an inline image sits
2779 // on the baseline and carries a descender's worth
2780 // of space under it, which is a fact about
2781 // replaced elements rather than a size this crate
2782 // chose. `cover` and `contain` are `Fit`'s two
2783 // named members reaching CSS unchanged, which is
2784 // an intent arriving rather than a value being
2785 // picked.
2786 | "block"
2787 | "cover"
2788 | "contain"
2789 // A relaxed part's three, and the third is the
2790 // awkward one. `-webkit-box` and `vertical` are
2791 // structure: they say the part is a box of lines
2792 // stacked downward, which is the only way CSS lets
2793 // anyone ask for a clamp at all.
2794 //
2795 // `2` is a count of lines, not a length. The
2796 // distinction this crate holds is between naming a
2797 // magnitude -- a padding, a height, a font size,
2798 // all of which belong to makeover-geometry -- and
2799 // naming how many of something there are. A line's
2800 // height is still the app's, so two lines is
2801 // whatever two of the app's lines come to, and
2802 // nothing here decides how tall that is. It is also
2803 // not a value picked here: it is `Flow::Relaxed`'s
2804 // own answer arriving unchanged, the same way
2805 // `cover` and `contain` are `Fit`'s.
2806 | "-webkit-box"
2807 | "vertical"
2808 | "2"
2809 ),
2810 "unrecognised literal value: {line}"
2811 );
2812 }
2813 }
2814
2815 #[test]
2816 fn flat_emits_nothing_at_all() {
2817 assert_eq!(depth_class(Depth::Flat, &Emit::default()), None);
2818 assert!(!depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("flat"));
2819 }
2820
2821 #[test]
2822 fn a_prefix_namespaces_every_class() {
2823 let opts = Emit {
2824 class_prefix: "mo-",
2825 ..Emit::default()
2826 };
2827 let css = depth_rules(&opts);
2828 assert!(css.contains(".mo-raised {"));
2829 assert!(css.contains(".mo-well {"));
2830 assert!(!css.contains(".raised {"));
2831 }
2832
2833 #[test]
2834 fn the_border_width_is_the_callers() {
2835 let opts = Emit {
2836 border_width: "2px",
2837 ..Emit::default()
2838 };
2839 assert!(bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts).contains("inset 2px 2px 0"));
2840 }
2841
2842 #[test]
2843 fn edges_agree_with_the_description() {
2844 // Not a tautology: it is the guard that a CSS-shaped convenience never
2845 // quietly reverses which side is lit.
2846 let (tl, br) = Bevel::Raised.edges();
2847 assert_eq!(tl.token(), Edge::Light.token());
2848 assert_eq!(br.token(), Edge::Dark.token());
2849 }
2850}