Skip to main content

makeover_webview/
lib.rs

1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet
19//!
20//! This module emits component CSS and no markup, deliberately. GoingsOn has
21//! 145 `innerHTML` sites and Balanced Breakfast 175 `createElement` sites, so
22//! moving markup is a migration where adopting a generated stylesheet is not.
23//! The apps keep every line of their markup and gain the classes.
24//!
25//! It is not a deletion either, which this header claimed until the measurement
26//! came in. Adoption across goingson removed 49 declarations net and *added* 25
27//! lines: a rule loses its depth declarations and gains a variant selector next
28//! to it, so the file stays the same size. What phase A moves is where depth is
29//! defined, not how much CSS exists. Numbers and method in the wiki note under
30//! "The deletion test, run".
31//!
32//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
33//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
34//!
35//! Some of what phase A emits is not a look but the withdrawal of one. A
36//! renderer that picks its element from the description inherits that element's
37//! user-agent chrome, and [`reset`] is where a primitive says which parts of it
38//! were never asked for.
39//!
40//! # Phase B: the markup, one description at a time
41//!
42//! [`form`] renders [`makeover_layout::Field`], which is the half of phase B
43//! whose description is settled. It emits strings, because both apps
44//! interpolate their fields into larger string-built forms and returning nodes
45//! would rewrite those too. It owns its own escaping, on the reasoning in that
46//! module: a Rust encoder can cover element text and attribute values with one
47//! function, where the apps need four and have to choose correctly at every
48//! call site.
49//!
50//! [`facet`] renders `makeover_layout::Facet`: a dimension a set is narrowed by,
51//! and the one phase-B emitter whose markup an app is not keeping, because the
52//! markup it replaces was two mechanisms rather than one. A tag's selection and
53//! a tag's browse position were separate state on MNW's discover page, which is
54//! why every filter row there carries a tick box *and* a chevron; one gesture
55//! doing both is what lets the second one go.
56//!
57//! [`list`] is the other half: column tracks, the narrowing rules, and the cell
58//! containers a row is made of. It stops at the cell boundary and does not
59//! render what goes inside one, on the reasoning in that module. So phase B is
60//! now the frame around content in both directions, and what an app still owns
61//! is the content itself.
62//!
63//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
64//!
65//! Measured against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a component
66//! list: `.btn`, `.card` and `.tag, .badge` each hand-write the same
67//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
68//!
69//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
70//! not be described as a pure deletion:
71//!
72//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
73//!   [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
74//!   will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
75//!   and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
76//!   where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
77//!   hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
78//!   that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
79//!   answer is there and not here.
80//! - **Badges go flat.** See [`token_rules`].
81//!
82//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
83//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
84//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
85//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
86//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
87//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
88//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
89//!
90//! # Interaction states
91//!
92//! [`interactive_rules`] emits four states, in emission order, and the order is
93//! load-bearing: they are all specificity (0,2,0), so disabled beats hover by
94//! coming last and by nothing else. Nothing here reaches for `:not(:disabled)`,
95//! which would raise a selector this crate wraps in its own layer.
96//!
97//! Emitting the states here is what keeps an app from completing the primitive
98//! from outside, by out-specifying a rule it does not own. Those overrides are
99//! also what breaks under cascade layers: an app that declares `@layer` puts
100//! its own rules in a named layer, and unlayered declarations outrank every
101//! named layer regardless of specificity.
102//!
103//! Hover sits inside a capability query. `makeover-touch` answers whether a
104//! fingertip has hover and `makeover-geometry` spells the condition; this crate
105//! asks and does not decide, so no app has to take the hover state back on
106//! touch.
107//!
108//! # The layer contract
109//!
110//! [`stylesheet`] emits into the `makeover` cascade layer ([`CSS_LAYER`], which
111//! lives in `makeover-geometry` because that is the one crate every CSS emitter
112//! in the family already depends on). `makeover-geometry` does the same for
113//! `geometry.css`.
114//!
115//! The cascade resolves origin and importance, then layer, then specificity,
116//! then source order, and **unlayered normal declarations outrank every named
117//! layer**. An unlayered generated file therefore beats every rule an app owns,
118//! regardless of specificity and regardless of loading last. Nothing errors when
119//! that happens: the CSS is valid, the minifier is happy, and buttons and badges
120//! look subtly wrong. The layer belongs here rather than in each app, because an
121//! app cannot fix it from its own stylesheet: the fix is to layer the file it
122//! does not own.
123//!
124//! An app should declare the order once, or the layer's position is decided by
125//! whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:
126//!
127//! ```css
128//! @layer makeover, base, components, responsive;
129//! ```
130//!
131//! [`in_css_layer`] is re-exported for an app that assembles its own stylesheet
132//! from this crate's pieces: rules an app generates from them are as generated
133//! as the ones here, so they belong in the same layer and this crate cannot put
134//! them there on the app's behalf.
135//!
136//! # Suggestions
137//!
138//! `Outcome::Suggestions` carries `Candidate` rather than `Choice`, and a
139//! candidate has no `unavailable`: a suggestion that cannot be picked is a row
140//! a route should not have offered. What it has instead is a `detail`, the line
141//! that tells it from a row reading the same, and it is drawn in
142//! `--content-muted` rather than in the disabled token. A detail orients rather
143//! than refuses, and every other secondary line in this crate reads the same
144//! way. The class is `.form-suggestion-detail`.
145//!
146//! # An interval is one question with two ends
147//!
148//! [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Interval`] emits a `role="group"` named by the
149//! field's label, holding one `<input type="number">` per end.
150//!
151//! - **The group carries the error and the descriptions**, on the split
152//!   [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Radio`] already uses here: what is wrong is
153//!   the answer, and a crossed interval is not the fault of either end.
154//! - **Both boxes take the whole extent.** `min`, `max` and `step` describe the
155//!   axis, so they are written twice. The crossing rule is not emitted, because
156//!   HTML has no attribute for it and the description does not carry it: it
157//!   comes back as an error on the group, like every other refusal.
158//! - **Which end is which is `aria-label` and nothing more.** The description
159//!   states direction structurally, by which member holds which name, and never
160//!   in words. Visible Min and Max captions are a page's own and reach the
161//!   group through [`form::Filling::trailing`].
162//!
163//! [`form::Value::Between`] is the second value. A separator inside one string
164//! would make this crate the owner of a delimiter that either end could contain.
165//!
166//! # A number's unit is adjacent text
167//!
168//! HTML has no unit attribute and inventing one would be markup nothing reads,
169//! so `Field::unit` is a `<span>` after the control. It is named in
170//! `aria-describedby` rather than left as decoration, because a number and what
171//! it is measured in are one fact and reading the first without the second is
172//! reading it wrong. What that buys is a unit a consumer can read back rather
173//! than a suffix on a label it would have to parse.
174//!
175//! # A curve this renderer can carry, and one it declines
176//!
177//! A range takes its granularity from the curve (`Field::curve.step()`), every
178//! other kind keeps `Field::step`, and `Curve::Linear` emits a plain range.
179//!
180//! **A constant-ratio curve emits a linear track, and that is the answer, not a
181//! debt.** HTML has no logarithmic range input, so a described screen asking
182//! for one is asking the browser for something it does not have, the same class
183//! of request as [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Date`] on a host with no
184//! calendar. The renderer answers with the nearest control the host really
185//! offers and keeps every fact that survives the translation: the extent, the
186//! granularity, and the value's own units. What does not survive is resolution
187//! at the small end. The value submitted is still a value in the field's own
188//! units, which is what every handler on this path reads.
189//!
190//! The alternatives are worse in the specific way this stack exists to avoid.
191//! Shipping JS that maps thumb position to value puts app code back in the
192//! renderer. Changing what the control submits from a value to a fraction moves
193//! the mapping to whoever reads the form, and a server reading these forms with
194//! its own handlers would take a fraction where a value is expected, silently.
195//!
196//! When this reopens: the day a described screen on the webview path asks for a
197//! non-linear range. The answer then is mapping in `quasi-router`, where one
198//! implementation serves every host, not JS here.
199//!
200//! # A markdown field gets a preview
201//!
202//! A [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Rich`] field is marked
203//! `data-format="markdown"`, and [`form::editor_rules`] is what spends that
204//! mark. The Write/Preview pair is a segmented control, so it takes the depth,
205//! the focus ring and the chosen state from rules that already exist; the
206//! preview pane is a well, because it stands where the control stood. Both are
207//! gated on the attribute rather than on a class, which is what the attribute is
208//! for. A permission taken and not spent turns every conversion into a
209//! regression.
210//!
211//! **This crate renders no markdown.** The pane arrives empty and is filled by
212//! whatever binds the editor, which is where the host's sanitiser already is. A
213//! converter here would move that guarantee into a crate with no view of the
214//! host's content-security posture.
215//!
216//! # Ranges, ghost text, and an option that cannot be picked
217//!
218//! - `FieldKind::Range` emits `<input type="range">`, and `Field::step` emits
219//!   `step`. The step is emitted only when the description carries one: the
220//!   browser's own default is `step="1"`, which is what a description means by
221//!   saying nothing, and is also what turns a 0-to-1 threshold into a
222//!   two-position control.
223//! - A select with nothing chosen emits a disabled, selected, valueless first
224//!   option carrying `Field::placeholder`. HTML has no placeholder attribute on
225//!   `<select>`; this is the idiom, and `required` keeps working through it
226//!   because the option's value is empty.
227//! - `Choice::unavailable` emits `disabled` plus the reason. Where it goes
228//!   differs by control and the difference is forced: a radio group gets a
229//!   `.form-option-reason` span beside the label, and a `<select>` option has
230//!   room for no element at all, so the reason runs into its text.
231//! - `Choice::detail` takes the same split for the same reason: a
232//!   `.form-option-detail` span in a radio group, run into the text of a
233//!   `<select>`'s option. An option carrying both reads what it is before why it
234//!   cannot be picked.
235//!
236//! # A cell says what it holds
237//!
238//! [`CellPart`](makeover_layout::CellPart) names the four things a cell holds,
239//! and [`table_rules`] turns them into `.cell-value`, `.cell-tokens`,
240//! `.cell-actions` and `.cell-link`. The value and the link take a colour: a
241//! token carries its own tone and an action is a control rather than text.
242//!
243//! The colour goes on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell`. On the container it
244//! cascades into the parts that are not text, and a control in a cell is painted
245//! as text, which is the drift
246//! [`RowPart::intent`](makeover_layout::RowPart) prevents for list rows.
247//!
248//! [`list::Cell::part`] is `Option<CellPart>` and never `Option<RowPart>`: the
249//! two answer different questions, and only one of them is about a cell.
250//!
251//! # A table narrows itself
252//!
253//! A table a description produced knows its columns at render time, so no rule
254//! can be written per table: it would have to travel with the markup, as a
255//! `<style>` element that needs `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` or in a head an htmx
256//! fragment swap does not carry. [`table_rules`] lays every table out as flex
257//! rows instead, each column starting at its declared floor and giving up room
258//! by its [`Priority`](makeover_layout::Priority), so the browser narrows a
259//! table at the width its floors add up to. [`list::column_classes`] is what
260//! puts the column's classes on a cell, and every cell's contents go in
261//! [`list::CELL_IN`]. **A header row emitted by a renderer's own code has to do
262//! both too**, or the header and the body disagree about which column just
263//! closed and how wide the rest are.
264//!
265//! `.button` takes the four tones as colour, off `data-tone`, the way the badge
266//! does, so a destructive button has somewhere for its tone to land. A list is
267//! reset rather than left as a bulleted list.
268//!
269//! `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` is not honoured. Hiding a row's actions until
270//! hover hides them from pointer users alone, who are the ones scanning a list
271//! to learn what can be done to a row, and every escape the rule grows
272//! (`focus-within` for the keyboard, a capability gate for a fingertip) is a
273//! report that hiding was wrong for somebody.
274//!
275//! # The depth classes are not controls
276//!
277//! `.raised` is a statement about shape and carries no interactive set, so the
278//! vocabulary has a raised surface that is merely an object. An app that wants
279//! one does not have to take a control class and cancel the control half.
280//!
281//! `.button` is the same depth *and* a control, and takes its states from
282//! [`surface_rules`], which is where a state belongs: on the thing that claims
283//! to answer a pointer. `.card` is a raised object, and it answers a pointer
284//! only when the element it is written on is a control -- `a`, `button`,
285//! `label`, or anything carrying `data-act` -- so one name serves the card
286//! that is read and the card that is pressed.
287//!
288//! # Substitution, three ways
289//!
290//! A theme with no `surface-well` is answered differently by each renderer,
291//! which is why substitution belongs to a renderer and not to the description:
292//!
293//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
294//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
295//!   terminal would quantise the two together.
296//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
297//!   var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
298//!   decides anything.
299
300#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
301
302pub mod chart;
303pub mod facet;
304pub mod figure;
305pub mod form;
306pub mod list;
307pub mod meter;
308pub mod placeholder;
309pub mod reset;
310pub mod vocabulary;
311
312/// A render of every emitter, scraped for the classes it wrote.
313///
314/// Test-only, and the guard behind [`vocabulary::names`]. See the module's own
315/// header for why the check renders rather than reads the source.
316#[cfg(test)]
317mod corpus;
318
319use crate::list::{cell_part_class, part_class};
320use crate::reset::{Chrome, Reset};
321use makeover_geometry::{Density, Gap, SizeClass};
322// Re-exported rather than redefined. An app assembling its own stylesheet out
323// of this crate's pieces needs the same layer name, and most such apps depend
324// on this crate and not on `makeover-geometry` directly.
325pub use makeover_geometry::{CSS_LAYER, in_css_layer};
326
327/// This crate's version, as the generated stylesheet reports it.
328///
329/// A consumer whose lockfile still pins an old `makeover-webview` gets a
330/// well-formed sheet with components missing and no error anywhere, so the
331/// emitter has to name itself in what it writes. Read by
332/// `makeover_build::layout_css` through [`stylesheet`].
333pub const VERSION: &str = env!("CARGO_PKG_VERSION");
334use makeover_layout::{
335    Bevel, CellPart, Depth, Fallback, Fill, Flow, Intent, RowPart, Selector, Sort, State, Token,
336    Tone,
337};
338use makeover_touch::Affordance;
339use std::fmt::Write as _;
340
341/// How the emitted CSS is shaped.
342#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
343pub struct Emit {
344    /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
345    ///
346    /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: border widths belong to
347    /// `makeover-geometry` and will come from there once it carries them.
348    pub border_width: &'static str,
349    /// Focus ring thickness, as a CSS length.
350    ///
351    /// Separate from [`border_width`](Self::border_width), and never derived
352    /// from it: a bevel and a focus indicator answer different questions, and
353    /// only one of them has to be noticed from across a desk.
354    ///
355    /// The default is the measured consensus rather than a new opinion. Every
356    /// consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose at least
357    /// 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
358    /// goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve
359    /// selectors. The design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px.
360    pub focus_width: &'static str,
361    /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
362    pub class_prefix: &'static str,
363}
364
365impl Default for Emit {
366    fn default() -> Self {
367        Self {
368            border_width: "1px",
369            focus_width: "2px",
370            class_prefix: "",
371        }
372    }
373}
374
375/// A string as CSS escapes, for a `content` value.
376///
377/// `\u{25B2}` becomes `\25B2`. Emitted escaped rather than literally so the
378/// stylesheet is ASCII whatever the description spells: a `content` string is
379/// read by whatever encoding the consumer serves the file as, and a caret that
380/// depends on that is a caret that works on one machine.
381///
382/// Terminated by the closing quote at every site here. A CSS hex escape takes
383/// up to six digits and ends at the first character that cannot be one, so an
384/// escape followed by more text would need a space that these do not.
385fn css_escape(text: &str) -> String {
386    text.chars().fold(String::new(), |mut out, c| {
387        let _ = write!(out, "\\{:X}", c as u32);
388        out
389    })
390}
391
392/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
393#[must_use]
394pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
395    match bevel {
396        Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
397        Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
398    }
399}
400
401/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
402/// the intent may be absent.
403///
404/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
405/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
406#[must_use]
407pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
408    match fill {
409        Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
410        other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
411    }
412}
413
414/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
415///
416/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
417/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
418/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
419/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
420#[must_use]
421pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
422    let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
423    let w = opts.border_width;
424    format!(
425        "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} -{w} 0 var(--{})",
426        top_left.token(),
427        bottom_right.token()
428    )
429}
430
431/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
432///
433/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
434/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
435/// without the fill reads the property directly.
436#[must_use]
437pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
438    let mut css = String::new();
439    for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset] {
440        let _ = writeln!(
441            css,
442            "    {}: {};",
443            bevel_var(bevel),
444            bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
445        );
446    }
447    css.push_str(ELEVATION_PROPERTY);
448    css
449}
450
451/// The cast shadow of a surface that floats over the page.
452///
453/// Composed here for the reason the bevel pair is: `makeover` derives the tone,
454/// this crate owns the geometry, and neither has to know the other's numbers.
455///
456/// **Only for a surface that overlays the page.** A menu, a toast, a popover, a
457/// dropdown. A surface *in* the page takes `.raised` and its bevel, and a rule
458/// that reaches for this on a card or a plate has renamed a literal rather than
459/// replaced it.
460///
461/// Two lengths rather than one, because a single blur reads as a smudge at
462/// plate size and as a halo at menu size. The offset is small and downward: a
463/// Platinum-era menu sits just off the page rather than hovering above it.
464const ELEVATION_PROPERTY: &str =
465    "    --elevation-overlay: 0 2px 4px var(--elevation), 0 8px 24px var(--elevation);\n";
466
467/// The class name for a depth.
468#[must_use]
469pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
470    let name = match depth {
471        Depth::Flat => return None,
472        Depth::Raised => "raised",
473        Depth::Well => "well",
474        Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
475        // A depth added to the description since this renderer was last
476        // built. No class, on the same footing as Flat: emitting a name
477        // whose rule body we cannot write would put a class in the markup
478        // that the stylesheet never defines.
479        _ => return None,
480    };
481    Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
482}
483
484/// A prefixed class name.
485///
486/// Public, for the renderers that emit markup this crate does not. A screen
487/// renderer writing `class="row"` has to prefix it the way the stylesheet half
488/// does, or a prefixed app gets rules matching everything except the elements
489/// that renderer wrote, and the failure is invisible: the CSS stays valid and
490/// one element is unstyled. Call this rather than copying it.
491#[must_use]
492pub fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
493    let mut out = String::with_capacity(opts.class_prefix.len() + name.len());
494    push_class(&mut out, name, opts);
495    out
496}
497
498/// A prefixed class name, written into a buffer the caller already has.
499///
500/// The form the emitters use, and the reason it exists is [`escape_into`]'s:
501/// putting every class on every element through a `format!` allocates even in
502/// the default case, where the prefix is empty and the answer is the argument.
503/// A described table row carries roughly eighty transient allocations that way,
504/// and this and the escaper are most of them.
505///
506/// [`class`] stays for callers holding a name rather than a buffer.
507///
508/// [`escape_into`]: crate::form::escape_into
509pub fn push_class(out: &mut String, name: &str, opts: &Emit) {
510    out.push_str(opts.class_prefix);
511    out.push_str(name);
512}
513
514/// The class an option of a selector carries, which is what the rules key off.
515///
516/// Named for the option and not for the group: [`selector_rules`] styles the
517/// thing that gets picked, so `Selector::Tabs` is `tab` and not `tabs`. The
518/// distinction is not pedantry. quasi-webview spelled these `tabs`, `segmented`
519/// and `option`, put `toggle` on the wrapping element rather than on the
520/// buttons inside it, and every described selector in that renderer came out
521/// with no depth, no focus ring and no chosen state, while the toggle group got
522/// a bevel meant for its buttons.
523///
524/// The chosen option additionally carries `chosen`, the same way a latched chip
525/// carries `latched`. That name is this crate's too; there is no reason for a
526/// caller to spell it, and [`selector_rules`] is where it is written down.
527#[must_use]
528pub fn option_class(selector: Selector) -> &'static str {
529    match selector {
530        Selector::Tabs => "tab",
531        Selector::Segmented => "segment",
532        Selector::Toggle => "toggle",
533    }
534}
535
536/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
537///
538/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
539/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
540/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
541/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
542///
543/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
544/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both would silently drop the fill for exactly
545/// that case. Independent does not
546/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
547/// disagree about what the region is.
548#[must_use]
549pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
550    let mut css = String::new();
551    if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
552        let _ = writeln!(css, "    background: {};", fill_var(fill));
553    }
554    if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
555        let _ = writeln!(css, "    box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
556    }
557    css
558}
559
560/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
561/// nothing.
562#[must_use]
563pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
564    let body = depth_declarations(depth);
565    if body.is_empty() {
566        return String::new();
567    }
568    format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
569}
570
571/// The media condition a hover rule has to sit inside, or `None` if hover is
572/// unconditional.
573///
574/// Two crates answer this and neither answer is made here. `makeover-touch`
575/// owns *whether* hover exists at a density, and `makeover-geometry` owns how
576/// that capability is spelled as a media condition. Asking both is what stops
577/// this renderer minting a third opinion, which is what all three apps did:
578/// goingson sniffed the user agent, Balanced Breakfast used `(hover: none)`
579/// alone, and the MNW server had no gate at all.
580///
581/// [`SizeClass`] is required by [`Affordance::available`] and ignored by this
582/// member, which reports as much through `reads_size`. Passing Compact is not
583/// a claim about width; the test below pins that every class agrees.
584fn hover_condition() -> Option<&'static str> {
585    if Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact) {
586        // A fingertip grew a hover state. Nothing to gate, and this renderer
587        // should not invent a reason to gate anyway.
588        None
589    } else {
590        Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition())
591    }
592}
593
594/// Put a rule inside a media query, or leave it alone.
595fn gated(condition: Option<&str>, rule: &str) -> String {
596    let Some(condition) = condition else {
597        return rule.to_string();
598    };
599    let mut css = format!("@media {condition} {{\n");
600    for line in rule.lines() {
601        // Blank lines stay blank. Indenting one leaves trailing whitespace,
602        // which is the sort of thing a formatter later reverts and calls a diff.
603        if line.is_empty() {
604            css.push('\n');
605        } else {
606            let _ = writeln!(css, "    {line}");
607        }
608    }
609    css.push_str("}\n");
610    css
611}
612
613/// The keyboard focus ring, placed by the depth it lands on.
614///
615/// This is the webview's **focus ring** and nothing more. **Reach** and
616/// **focus** are both the browser's — the document decides what is reachable
617/// and `:focus-visible` decides which reached thing wears the ring — and no
618/// description states either. The three terms are defined once in
619/// `makeover_layout`'s crate header, "Reach, focus and the focus ring".
620///
621/// One ring for the whole system, because a focus ring's job is to be
622/// recognised and three apps having three of them is the failure. What varies
623/// is where it sits, and that comes off [`Depth`] rather than off a per-
624/// component choice: a well takes the ring inside its own edge, and anything
625/// standing proud of the page takes it outside.
626///
627/// `outline` rather than the composed `box-shadow` the invalid-field ring at
628/// [`field_rules`] uses, and deliberately the one place the two rings are built
629/// differently. A `box-shadow` ring has to restate the bevel beside it, because
630/// `box-shadow` is not additive and a lone ring silently drops the well out
631/// from under the element. That restatement is a second copy of the depth,
632/// living in a different function from the first, and it is exactly the
633/// duplication `Depth` exists to prevent. `outline` occupies its own property,
634/// so the bevel survives untouched and there is nothing to keep in agreement.
635/// They render the same: both are a flush ring one border-width wide.
636#[must_use]
637pub fn focus_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
638    let w = opts.focus_width;
639    // Same magnitude either way, and only the sign comes off the depth. Both
640    // values are what the consumers had already converged on independently:
641    // 2px out is what all three wrote, and 2px in is the MNW server's own
642    // answer for the one inset ring it had.
643    let offset = match depth.bevel() {
644        // Inside the well, clear of its edge rather than painted over it.
645        Some(Bevel::Inset) => format!("calc(-1 * {w})"),
646        // Raised, or no edge at all. Outside, standing off by its own width.
647        _ => w.to_string(),
648    };
649    // The token by name. It is `makeover`'s, derived from the action colour,
650    // and reaching it through a description member was a second path to the
651    // same variable for as long as one existed.
652    format!(
653        ".{selector}:focus-visible {{\n    outline: {w} solid var(--focus-ring);\n    outline-offset: {offset};\n}}\n"
654    )
655}
656
657/// A rest depth said out loud on both axes, for a rule that has to beat the
658/// states above it.
659///
660/// [`depth_declarations`] states an axis only when the depth has something to
661/// say about it, which is right for a rest rule: a [`Depth::Flat`] region
662/// inherits what it sits on, and asserting `background: none` there would be
663/// the difference between level-with and painted-transparent. It is wrong for
664/// a rule whose whole job is to take a state back. An axis left unstated is an
665/// axis the state above keeps, so `Flat` re-asserted nothing at all and a
666/// disabled control kept whatever hover had given it.
667///
668/// So the axes the depth is silent on are withdrawn rather than skipped, and
669/// the withdrawal is spelled by [`reset`] rather than here, so a disabled
670/// control and a flat one say the same words. Reaches further than the fill:
671/// [`Depth::Sunken`] and [`Depth::Overlay`] have no bevel either, and the
672/// pressed rule above hands out an inset one.
673fn rest_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
674    let mut css = String::new();
675    match depth.fill() {
676        Some(fill) => {
677            let _ = writeln!(css, "    background: {};", fill_var(fill));
678        }
679        None => css.push_str(&Reset::NOTHING.and(Chrome::Fill).declarations()),
680    }
681    match depth.bevel() {
682        Some(bevel) => {
683            let _ = writeln!(css, "    box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
684        }
685        None => css.push_str(&Reset::NOTHING.and(Chrome::Shadow).declarations()),
686    }
687    css
688}
689
690/// Present, visible, and not answering.
691///
692/// Matches the ARIA attribute as well as the pseudo-class, because `:disabled`
693/// only matches form elements and half the things this crate emits are not
694/// one: a `div` carrying `.chip` or `.tab` can never be `:disabled`. Keying on
695/// the accessible state is the pattern [`field_rules`] already establishes for
696/// `aria-invalid`, on the reasoning that one fact read by both the styling and
697/// the accessibility tree cannot drift from itself.
698///
699/// The rest depth is re-asserted rather than assumed, because this rule has to
700/// beat the hover and pressed rules above it. It does that on source order at
701/// equal specificity, not by out-specifying them: every rule this function's
702/// caller emits is (0,2,0), and adding a `:not(:disabled)` anywhere would raise
703/// one of them and have to be unpicked when this output moves inside its own
704/// cascade layer.
705///
706/// Re-asserted on **both** axes, through [`rest_declarations`].
707/// `depth_declarations` alone is empty for [`Depth::Flat`], so a flat control
708/// would win the contest with nothing to say and keep the hover surface
709/// underneath a control that had stopped answering.
710#[must_use]
711pub fn disabled_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
712    format!(
713        ".{selector}:disabled,\n.{selector}[aria-disabled=\"true\"] {{\n{}    color: var(--{});\n    cursor: not-allowed;\n}}\n",
714        rest_declarations(depth),
715        State::Disabled.token()
716    )
717}
718
719/// Every state a selector that answers a click implies: hover, pressed, focus
720/// and disabled, in that order.
721///
722/// Order is the whole cascade mechanism here. All four selectors are
723/// specificity (0,2,0), so disabled wins over hover and pressed by coming last
724/// and by nothing else.
725///
726/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
727/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
728/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
729/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
730/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
731/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
732///
733/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
734/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
735/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
736/// consumed until now. What it *is* gated on is capability, via
737/// [`hover_condition`]. Before that gate existed the apps each wrote their own:
738/// goingson's section 60 exists solely to take back the hover state this
739/// function had just handed it, by out-specifying a rule it does not own.
740///
741/// `depth` is the selector's **rest** depth, used to place the focus ring and
742/// to restore the surface under a disabled control. The pressed rule keeps
743/// inverting from [`Depth::Raised`] regardless: a tab's unchosen depth is
744/// [`Depth::Sunken`], and `Sunken.pressed()` is `Sunken`, so deriving the press
745/// from the rest depth would leave a tab with no press at all.
746#[must_use]
747pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
748    let mut css = gated(
749        hover_condition(),
750        &format!(".{selector}:hover {{\n    background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n"),
751    );
752    css.push_str(&depth_rule(
753        &format!("{selector}:active"),
754        Depth::Raised.pressed(),
755    ));
756    css.push_str(&focus_rule(selector, depth, opts));
757    css.push_str(&disabled_rule(selector, depth));
758    css
759}
760
761/// The compound a card's interactive states are written against: the class
762/// on an element that is itself a control.
763///
764/// `label` for a card wrapping a choice, `[data-act]` for an act a renderer
765/// drew on some other element. Without the class prefix, the way every
766/// selector handed to [`interactive_rules`] is.
767#[must_use]
768pub fn pressable_card(card: &str) -> String {
769    format!("{card}:is(a, button, label, [data-act])")
770}
771
772/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
773///
774/// A depth and nothing else. `.raised` says a surface sits on what is behind
775/// it, which is a statement about the shape and not about what happens when a
776/// pointer arrives, so it emits no hover, press, focus or disabled rule. The
777/// named surfaces are where interaction lives: `.button`, and `.card` written
778/// on a control, get their states from [`surface_rules`].
779///
780/// Giving this class the interactive set leaves the vocabulary with no raised
781/// surface that is merely an object, so a consumer that needs one has to take a
782/// control class and cancel half of it.
783#[must_use]
784pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
785    let mut css = String::new();
786    for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
787        let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
788            continue;
789        };
790        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
791    }
792    css
793}
794
795/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
796///
797/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
798/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
799/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
800/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
801/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
802/// drifting apart again.
803///
804/// A card's states hang off [`pressable_card`] rather than the bare class. A
805/// card is a raised object that answers a pointer only when it is written on a
806/// control, which is what lets one name cover both: a store tile that is one
807/// link, a tier picker that is a label round a radio, and a use-case card that
808/// does nothing and so has no hover to cancel.
809fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
810    let mut css = String::new();
811    let button = class("button", opts);
812    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&button, Depth::Raised));
813    css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&button, Depth::Raised, opts));
814
815    let card = class("card", opts);
816    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&card, Depth::Raised));
817    css.push_str(&interactive_rules(
818        &pressable_card(&card),
819        Depth::Raised,
820        opts,
821    ));
822
823    let field = class("field", opts);
824    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
825
826    // A field takes focus and refuses input like everything else here, and got
827    // neither until now, which is why all three apps hand-write a focus ring
828    // for it and no two of them match. No hover or pressed: a text field does
829    // not light up under the pointer and does not invert when clicked, so the
830    // two states `interactive_rules` would add are the two it does not have.
831    css.push_str(&focus_rule(&field, Depth::Well, opts));
832    css.push_str(&disabled_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
833
834    // Keyed on the ARIA attribute rather than on a class, so the visual state
835    // and the accessible state cannot drift apart: there is one fact and both
836    // read it. goingson already drove its invalid styling this way and was
837    // right to; the `.invalid` class this emitted before 0.5.0 was a second
838    // place to forget.
839    //
840    // The ring composes *after* the bevel rather than replacing it. box-shadow
841    // is not additive, so a lone ring silently dropped the well out from under
842    // an invalid field. Flat and unlit: this edge is saying "wrong", and
843    // lighting one side would have it say "raised" at the same time.
844    let _ = writeln!(
845        css,
846        ".{field}[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {{\n    box-shadow: var({}), 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
847        bevel_var(Bevel::Inset),
848        opts.border_width
849    );
850    css
851}
852
853/// Badges and chips.
854///
855/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
856/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
857/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
858/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
859/// decide which of the two it always was.
860///
861/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
862/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
863/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
864/// Text that goes somewhere.
865///
866/// The one inline control. A table cell carries `cell-link` instead, which
867/// reads as its row's title rather than as a link; this is the same thing
868/// outside a table, which is what a described run holds when a sentence
869/// contains a link.
870///
871/// Colour and underline only. Whether a link is inline in a sentence or sitting
872/// on its own line is the app's layout, and how much room it takes is
873/// `makeover-geometry`'s. What is here is the pair of signals that say "this
874/// goes somewhere" and nothing that says where it sits.
875///
876/// The visited arm is deliberately absent. A link inside an app points at the
877/// app's own screens, which the user is expected to have been to, so painting
878/// them differently marks almost everything and distinguishes nothing.
879fn link_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
880    let mut css = String::new();
881    let link = class("link", opts);
882
883    let _ = writeln!(
884        css,
885        ".{link} {{\n    color: var(--action);\n    \
886         text-decoration: underline;\n}}"
887    );
888    // The hover step is the same one every other control takes, and it is a
889    // colour rather than a surface: a link has no box to raise.
890    let _ = writeln!(
891        css,
892        "@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine) {{\n    .{link}:hover \
893         {{\n        color: var(--action-hover);\n    }}\n}}"
894    );
895    let _ = writeln!(
896        css,
897        ".{link}:focus-visible {{\n    outline: {} solid var(--focus-ring);\n    \
898         outline-offset: 2px;\n}}",
899        opts.focus_width
900    );
901    // A link is often a `<button>` rather than an `<a>`: a renderer picks the
902    // element from the method, so a link that writes is a button that has to
903    // stop looking like one. What that costs is named in [`reset`].
904    css.push_str(&Reset::TEXT_BUTTON.rule(&format!("button.{link}")));
905    css
906}
907
908fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
909    let mut css = String::new();
910
911    // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
912    // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
913    let badge = class("badge", opts);
914    // `content-muted` literally, not `Tone::Neutral.token()`. What makes a
915    // badge quiet is `Token::Badge` answering no click, which this crate holds
916    // and `Tone` genuinely does not know. Routing it through Neutral put the
917    // claim where the evidence was not, and the bill arrived on the figure
918    // value: it took the same muting from the same call and read as its own
919    // caption. Neutral answers `content` from makeover-layout 0.36.0.
920    //
921    // A badge is a chip, wiki `table-model`: an opaque fill inside an edge, in
922    // the theme's own ink at normal weight. Coloured text was never ratified
923    // and measured 1.34:1 on goingson's warning; muted text 2.78:1 on
924    // solarized-dark. So the ink is `content` and what says which kind of
925    // token it is moves to the fill and the edge: the table's raised ground for
926    // a neutral chip, makeover's `*-surface` for a status, edged in its tone.
927    // Still no bevel: a label with a raised edge says it can be pressed.
928    let bw = opts.border_width;
929    let _ = writeln!(
930        css,
931        ".{badge} {{\n    display: inline-flex;\n    align-items: center;\n    \
932         padding: 0 var(--step-snug);\n    border: {bw} solid var(--border);\n    \
933         border-radius: var(--radius-fine);\n    background: var(--surface-raised);\n    \
934         color: var(--content);\n    font-weight: normal;\n}}"
935    );
936    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
937        let _ = writeln!(
938            css,
939            ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    background: var(--{0}-surface);\n    \
940             border-color: var(--{0});\n}}",
941            tone.token()
942        );
943    }
944
945    // A button carries the four tones a badge does. It had none, on the reading
946    // that a control's colour is its surface rather than its text, and that
947    // reading has one hole big enough to matter: the button that destroys
948    // something. Every consumer had written that rule itself, and a description
949    // that says `Tone::Danger` on an act had nowhere for it to land.
950    //
951    // Colour and not a fill, matching the badge. A red surface is a decision
952    // about emphasis that belongs to an app's own layer, and two of them
953    // fighting is worse than neither.
954    let button = class("button", opts);
955    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
956        let _ = writeln!(
957            css,
958            ".{button}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
959            tone.token()
960        );
961    }
962
963    // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
964    // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
965    // markup and waits for phase B.
966    let chip = class("chip", opts);
967    let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
968    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
969    css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip, unlatched.depth(false), opts));
970    css.push_str(&depth_rule(
971        &format!("{chip}.latched"),
972        unlatched.depth(true),
973    ));
974    css
975}
976
977/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
978///
979/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
980/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
981/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
982/// three are not one member with a flag.
983///
984/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
985/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
986///
987/// Both states emit. Naming only the chosen option leaves an unchosen one
988/// falling through to [`Depth::Flat`] with nothing drawn for it, so an app has
989/// to hand-write the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
990fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
991    let mut css = String::new();
992    for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
993        let c = class(option_class(selector), opts);
994        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
995        css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, selector.unchosen(), opts));
996        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
997    }
998    css
999}
1000
1001/// The parts of a list row.
1002///
1003/// The list is written out rather than derived because `RowPart` is
1004/// `#[non_exhaustive]`, so there is nothing to iterate. A member added upstream emits no rule until it is named here, which
1005/// is the trade `non_exhaustive` makes: a silent gap instead of a build break.
1006/// [`part_class`] carries the same list and the same obligation.
1007fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1008    let mut css = String::new();
1009
1010    // The container the rows sit in, giving back what a `<ul>` brought. Not a
1011    // size: there is no magnitude in it, which is the line this crate holds.
1012    css.push_str(&Reset::BULLETS.rule(&format!(".{}", class("list", opts))));
1013
1014    for part in [
1015        RowPart::Primary,
1016        RowPart::Secondary,
1017        RowPart::Meta,
1018        RowPart::Actions,
1019        RowPart::Tokens,
1020        RowPart::Proportion,
1021    ] {
1022        let c = class(part_class(part), opts);
1023
1024        // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
1025        // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
1026        // would be louder than saying nothing. Tokens answer alike, for their
1027        // own reason: each token carries its own tone, and a colour on the
1028        // strip would fight the things sitting in it. A proportion is the same
1029        // case again: the meter inside carries the tone.
1030        if !matches!(
1031            part,
1032            RowPart::Actions | RowPart::Tokens | RowPart::Proportion
1033        ) {
1034            let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n    color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
1035        }
1036
1037        // A row's actions are shown at rest. `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` said
1038        // otherwise and was not honoured here from 0.23.0; makeover-layout
1039        // 0.13.0 retired the method, so there is no longer a description saying
1040        // one thing and a renderer doing another.
1041        //
1042        // The rule was `opacity: 0` gated to pointer devices, revealed on
1043        // `:hover` and on `:focus-within`. Each escape it needed was a report
1044        // that hiding was wrong for somebody: `focus-within` because tabbing
1045        // could never reach an action; the gate because a fingertip had no way
1046        // to unhide, which both webview apps had already hand-written
1047        // `opacity: 1` to undo. What was left was a control hidden from
1048        // exactly one group: people using a pointer, who are also the group
1049        // scanning a list to find out what can be done to a row.
1050        //
1051        // A settings screen is where that reads worst: the whole reason to be
1052        // on it is to remove a key, and the button doing so was invisible
1053        // until pointed at. A table cell's actions were never hidden, so the
1054        // two arrangements now agree.
1055    }
1056
1057    // A part that may take two lines. `Flow::Tight` gets no rule: one line is
1058    // what a run already does, and restating it here would put a declaration on
1059    // every part in every row to say nothing.
1060    //
1061    // This is the shape both webview apps had already written by hand and
1062    // commented -- Balanced Breakfast on a feed row's title, goingson on a
1063    // problem's body -- which is the whole argument for the description
1064    // carrying it. `-webkit-` prefixed and unprefixed together: the prefixed
1065    // trio is what every engine actually implements, and `line-clamp` is the
1066    // standard property landing behind it.
1067    let _ = writeln!(
1068        css,
1069        ".{} {{\n    display: -webkit-box;\n    -webkit-box-orient: vertical;\n    -webkit-line-clamp: {lines};\n    line-clamp: {lines};\n    overflow: hidden;\n}}",
1070        class("row-relaxed", opts),
1071        lines = Flow::Relaxed.lines()
1072    );
1073
1074    // A row inside a hierarchy: a tree, an outline, a threaded list.
1075    // `edf33114`, decided 2026-08-30 (Max). makeover-layout names the concept
1076    // as `Nesting` -- deliberately not `Depth`, which is surface bevel in that
1077    // crate -- and this is the rule.
1078    //
1079    // Measured 2026-08-30: quasi-webview has been emitting `row-nested` with
1080    // `style="--row-depth:N"` on every described hierarchy, and **no stylesheet
1081    // anywhere in the tree read any of it**. So a described outline in a
1082    // browser was a flat list with chevrons in it -- the folding worked and the
1083    // indent did not exist.
1084    //
1085    // The magnitude is a custom property with a fallback, which is this crate's
1086    // own shape: `--awaiting-gap` above is the precedent, and an app overriding
1087    // `--row-indent` is how a level becomes worth more or less. What a level IS
1088    // stays the description's; what it is WORTH is a renderer's, and a terminal
1089    // spending columns for the same fact is not disagreeing.
1090    //
1091    // Here rather than in each app, and that was a live option rather than an
1092    // oversight. `row-select`, `row-current` and `row-chosen` are app-styled by
1093    // design; the indent is not decoration, it is what the description MEANS,
1094    // and three apps agreeing about it by accident is not agreement.
1095    //
1096    // `padding` and not `margin`: a row is a box that can be selected and
1097    // hovered, and indenting with margin would take the indent out of the
1098    // highlight, so the shading under a nested row would start where its text
1099    // does rather than where its row does.
1100    let _ = writeln!(
1101        css,
1102        ".{} {{\n    padding-inline-start: calc(var(--row-depth, 0) * var(--row-indent, 1.5ch));\n}}",
1103        class("row-nested", opts)
1104    );
1105
1106    // The two halves of a branch, emitted by quasi-webview and unstyled until
1107    // now for the same reason.
1108    //
1109    // A branch row is the one a reader can fold, and the chevron is its hit
1110    // target. The chevron is drawn by the app or the description -- this says
1111    // where it sits and how big the target is, which is the accessibility fact
1112    // rather than the decorative one: a control smaller than this is one a
1113    // finger misses.
1114    let _ = writeln!(
1115        css,
1116        ".{} {{\n    display: flex;\n    align-items: baseline;\n    gap: var(--row-disclose-gap, 0.5ch);\n}}",
1117        class("row-branch", opts)
1118    );
1119    let _ = writeln!(
1120        css,
1121        ".{} {{\n    flex: none;\n    min-inline-size: var(--tap-target, 2rem);\n    min-block-size: var(--tap-target, 2rem);\n    background: none;\n    border: 0;\n    color: inherit;\n    cursor: pointer;\n}}",
1122        class("row-disclose", opts)
1123    );
1124
1125    css
1126}
1127
1128/// A row of things that share their space, and what each fallback gets here.
1129///
1130/// Ruling: wiki `layout-room-and-fallback`, Max. Rule 1 is that every described
1131/// member is in flow, and these rules are how that is kept rather than asked
1132/// for. A member taken out of flow with `position: absolute` contributes zero
1133/// width to the row it shares, so nothing can collide with it and nothing
1134/// prevents the collision.
1135///
1136/// # The floor, which is most of the fix
1137///
1138/// `.run > *` gets `min-width: min-content`. That is the derived minimum the
1139/// ruling asks for, in this renderer's own unit and stated by the browser
1140/// rather than by anybody: a member cannot be squeezed narrower than what is
1141/// in it, so members in one flow push each other instead of overlapping. It
1142/// costs no query and no number, and it is what fixes all four measured widths
1143/// whichever fallback the group declared.
1144///
1145/// # A member that asks to fill
1146///
1147/// `.run > [data-width="fill"]` gets `flex: 1 1 0`, which is the second half of
1148/// what a column has always been able to say, reaching a row of regions.
1149/// `flex-basis: 0` and not `auto` is what makes several fills divide the room
1150/// equally rather than dividing the leftovers in proportion to their contents;
1151/// equal division is [`makeover_layout::Width::Fill`]'s own stated rule. The
1152/// floor above still applies, so a fill cannot shrink under what is in it.
1153///
1154/// A member that says nothing gets nothing, because a flex item with the floor
1155/// and no grow is already content-sized. That is why the omitted value here is
1156/// `Content` while a control omits `Fill`: each position leaves out what it
1157/// already did.
1158///
1159/// # What each fallback gets, exactly
1160///
1161/// [`Fallback::Wrap`] is `flex-wrap: wrap`, which is exact. The browser wraps
1162/// the run when the members no longer fit, deciding that from their own
1163/// intrinsic widths, which is the derived minimum doing the whole job.
1164///
1165/// [`Fallback::Stack`] is wrap plus `flex: 1 1 max-content` on the members, so
1166/// a member that cannot sit beside its sibling takes a line of its own and
1167/// fills it. For the two-member run this was ruled on -- a tab strip and a
1168/// band -- that is precisely "a row becomes a column".
1169///
1170/// [`Fallback::Shed`] and [`Fallback::Menu`] get wrap, and this renderer is
1171/// honouring less than the description says. **CSS cannot express either one
1172/// without breaking the ruling's own first constraint.** Both need to know that
1173/// the run is out of room in order to take a member out of it, a container
1174/// query is the only construct that can ask, and `@container` compares against
1175/// a `<length>` -- there is no `@container (inline-size < min-content)`. So
1176/// every honest spelling of Shed here needs an authored breakpoint, which is
1177/// the thing the ruling exists to forbid, and the dishonest ones are worse: a
1178/// clamped height clips by document order rather than by [`Priority`], and
1179/// `display: none` under a viewport `@media` is the `nth-child(n+5)` bug the
1180/// vocabulary replaced.
1181///
1182/// Wrapping is the right thing to do instead. It keeps every member reachable,
1183/// which is the property that was actually broken -- goingson's new-contact
1184/// button left the viewport entirely at 560 -- and it keeps rule 1. A renderer
1185/// answering with less than was described is precedented and deliberate here:
1186/// [`makeover_layout::Region::Columns`] says a terminal stacking a board's
1187/// columns is honouring the description rather than degrading it.
1188///
1189/// The real mechanism needs the shed members to have somewhere to go, which is
1190/// markup and belongs to quasi-webview: an overflow control is a member of the
1191/// run, and the description does not yet say that a member *is* one.
1192///
1193/// # Menu, once a script is measuring
1194///
1195/// That is now built, in `quasi-webview`'s `menu.js`, and this crate's half of
1196/// it is two classes and one override. A script that has taken a menu run over
1197/// marks it `data-menu`, and a marked run goes back to `nowrap`: wrapping is
1198/// what hides the overflow condition the script is trying to measure. The
1199/// unmarked rule above is untouched, so a page that ships no script still
1200/// wraps, which is rule 1 — every member reachable — rather than a strip with
1201/// tabs squeezed off the end.
1202///
1203/// `.run-overflow` is the control the shed members move into and
1204/// `.run-overflow-items` is where they land. The geometry is this crate's the
1205/// way every other surface's is; what is *in* it is the script's, because which
1206/// members no longer fit is a measurement and not a description.
1207fn run_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1208    let run = class("run", opts);
1209    let mut css = String::new();
1210
1211    // `flex-wrap: nowrap` is stated rather than left to the default, because
1212    // the fallbacks below are read as overrides of this line and a reader
1213    // should not have to know which way flexbox leans to see that.
1214    //
1215    // No gap. Spacing between members is the app's, the same way this crate
1216    // states no margins anywhere else; a gap here would be a size, and the one
1217    // hardcoded size in the mechanism is makeover-geometry's contact patch.
1218    let _ = writeln!(
1219        css,
1220        ".{run} {{\n    display: flex;\n    flex-wrap: nowrap;\n    align-items: center;\n}}"
1221    );
1222
1223    // The derived minimum, and the whole reason a member can no longer be
1224    // overlapped. `min-width: auto` is flexbox's default for a flex item and is
1225    // *not* the same thing: auto lets an item be compressed below its content
1226    // in a nowrap run, which is how a toolbar ends up drawn over a tab strip
1227    // even without anything leaving the flow.
1228    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{run} > * {{\n    min-width: min-content;\n}}");
1229
1230    // A member that absorbs what is left. `flex-basis: 0` rather than `auto` is
1231    // what makes several fills divide the room equally instead of dividing the
1232    // leftovers in proportion to what is already in them, which is
1233    // `Width::Fill`'s own rule and the one thing that type states about more
1234    // than one of them.
1235    //
1236    // The `min-width: min-content` floor above is deliberately not overridden.
1237    // A fill that could shrink below its contents would overlap its neighbour,
1238    // which is rule 1, and equal division under a floor is still equal division
1239    // everywhere the floor is not reached.
1240    //
1241    // Attribute rather than class, because the width is a fact the description
1242    // carried rather than a hook this crate invented: the same division
1243    // `data-tone` and `data-selector` are on the right side of. It beats the
1244    // `Stack` rule below on specificity whichever order they are written in,
1245    // which is what a member asking to fill should do to a blanket.
1246    let _ = writeln!(
1247        css,
1248        ".{run} > [data-width=\"fill\"] {{\n    flex: 1 1 0;\n}}"
1249    );
1250
1251    for fallback in [
1252        Fallback::Wrap,
1253        Fallback::Stack,
1254        Fallback::Shed,
1255        Fallback::Menu,
1256    ] {
1257        let name = fallback_class(fallback);
1258        let c = class(name, opts);
1259        let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n    flex-wrap: wrap;\n}}");
1260        if matches!(fallback, Fallback::Stack) {
1261            let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} > * {{\n    flex: 1 1 max-content;\n}}");
1262        }
1263    }
1264
1265    // A menu run a script has taken over. The mark is the script's and this is
1266    // the only rule that reads it: wrapping is what a run does when nothing is
1267    // measuring, and it is also what makes the overflow unmeasurable, since a
1268    // wrapped run always fits. The two cannot both be on.
1269    let menu = class(fallback_class(Fallback::Menu), opts);
1270    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{menu}[data-menu] {{\n    flex-wrap: nowrap;\n}}");
1271
1272    // The overflow control, and it is a member of the run like any other: in
1273    // flow, at the end, taking the width of what is in it. `relative` is what
1274    // the items hang off.
1275    let overflow = class("run-overflow", opts);
1276    let items = class("run-overflow-items", opts);
1277    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{overflow} {{\n    position: relative;\n}}");
1278
1279    // Overlaid rather than in flow, for the reason every menu is: a control
1280    // that pushed the page down when it opened would change the layout it was
1281    // opened to escape. `inset-inline-end: 0` rather than a left, so the panel
1282    // stays on the page in both writing directions.
1283    //
1284    // No width, no padding and no border. All three are sizes and sizes are
1285    // makeover-geometry's; what is stated here is placement, the surface and
1286    // the shadow that separates it from the page, which is the same division
1287    // `figure_rules` and the timeline entry make. The elevation shadow is what
1288    // an overlaid surface takes instead of an edge -- see `ELEVATION_PROPERTY`.
1289    let _ = writeln!(
1290        css,
1291        ".{items} {{\n    \
1292         position: absolute;\n    \
1293         inset-block-start: 100%;\n    \
1294         inset-inline-end: 0;\n    \
1295         z-index: 1;\n    \
1296         display: flex;\n    \
1297         flex-direction: column;\n    \
1298         align-items: stretch;\n    \
1299         background: var(--surface-raised);\n    \
1300         box-shadow: var(--elevation-overlay);\n\
1301         }}"
1302    );
1303
1304    // `hidden` is how the script closes it, and a flex display would otherwise
1305    // beat the attribute's own `display: none`.
1306    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{items}[hidden] {{\n    display: none;\n}}");
1307
1308    css
1309}
1310
1311/// Every class [`fallback_class`] can return, plus the run itself.
1312///
1313/// [`ROW_PART_CLASSES`](crate::list::ROW_PART_CLASSES)'s reasoning and the same
1314/// obligation: a `match` over a `#[non_exhaustive]` enum cannot be enumerated
1315/// from outside, so the list sits beside it and a test holds the two together.
1316/// `run` is in it because it is emitted in its own right rather than only as a
1317/// fallback's fallback.
1318pub const RUN_CLASSES: &[&str] = &[
1319    "run",
1320    "run-wrap",
1321    "run-stack",
1322    "run-shed",
1323    "run-menu",
1324    // Not returned by `fallback_class`: these two are the overflow control a
1325    // measuring renderer builds, and they are in the list because the list is
1326    // what a host seals its vocabulary against. A class emitted by a script and
1327    // missing from here is a control with no surface and no edge.
1328    "run-overflow",
1329    "run-overflow-items",
1330];
1331
1332/// The class a run carries for what it does when it is tight.
1333///
1334/// A run always carries `.run` as well, so an unrecognised fallback -- the enum
1335/// is `#[non_exhaustive]` -- lands as a plain nowrap row with the min-content
1336/// floor still under it. That is the safe failure: every member in flow and
1337/// none overlapped, which is the property, with only the rearrangement missing.
1338#[must_use]
1339pub fn fallback_class(fallback: Fallback) -> &'static str {
1340    match fallback {
1341        Fallback::Wrap => "run-wrap",
1342        Fallback::Stack => "run-stack",
1343        Fallback::Shed => "run-shed",
1344        Fallback::Menu => "run-menu",
1345        _ => "run",
1346    }
1347}
1348
1349/// The progress trough these rules fill.
1350///
1351/// [`meter::meter_html`](crate::meter::meter_html) is what fills these.
1352///
1353/// The rules stay a superset of what a description can ask for. An app drawing
1354/// its own bar keeps these classes, which is what the four goingson grew
1355/// independently were adopted onto.
1356///
1357/// The trough is a [`Depth::Well`], the same reading a text field gets:
1358/// something with its content down inside it.
1359fn progress_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1360    let progress = class("progress", opts);
1361    // `progress-fill` rather than a bare `fill`: an unprefixed build claims
1362    // these names in the app's own stylesheet, and `.fill` is grabby enough to
1363    // catch things that have nothing to do with progress. goingson already
1364    // calls it `.progress-fill`, so this is also the name that deletes.
1365    let fill = class("progress-fill", opts);
1366    let mut css = depth_rule(&progress, Depth::Well);
1367
1368    // The untoned bar is `--action`, not [`Tone::Neutral`]. That is the one
1369    // place this differs from the badge rules, and deliberately: a badge with
1370    // no status is a muted label, while a bar with no status is still
1371    // reporting progress, and `content-muted` would read as disabled.
1372    let _ = writeln!(
1373        css,
1374        ".{progress} > .{fill} {{\n    background: var(--action);\n}}"
1375    );
1376
1377    // A bar can be saying something, same as a badge: goingson colours subtask
1378    // progress as success and an over-estimate as danger, which is real
1379    // information rather than decoration. Emitting the tones is what lets that
1380    // survive adoption instead of staying hand-written.
1381    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1382        let _ = writeln!(
1383            css,
1384            ".{progress} > .{fill}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    background: var(--{0});\n}}",
1385            tone.token()
1386        );
1387    }
1388    css
1389}
1390
1391/// What a wait looks like, for the attribute that has been describing one to
1392/// nobody.
1393///
1394/// Wiki `loading-and-progress-standard`, phase 2. `data-awaiting` is emitted
1395/// as `data-awaiting="determinate"` with a `data-awaiting-amount` beside it, or
1396/// `data-awaiting="indeterminate"` alone. This is the half that styles them,
1397/// without which the two render identically.
1398///
1399/// # Why it is keyed on `aria-busy` and not on the attribute alone
1400///
1401/// `data-awaiting` is a fact about the control: pressing this waits. It is true
1402/// when the page is painted and it stays true. Whether a wait is *running* is
1403/// true only between two events, so it is the binder's to set, and `aria-busy`
1404/// is the standard spelling of it — announced as well as drawn, which a class
1405/// of our own would not be.
1406///
1407/// That also keeps this crate out of any one client library's vocabulary.
1408/// `quasi-webview` sets `aria-busy` from htmx's request events; a host driving
1409/// the same markup another way sets it the same way and gets the same drawing.
1410///
1411/// # The two drawings
1412///
1413/// One pseudo-element either way, so no renderer has to emit an extra node.
1414///
1415/// Indeterminate is the activity mark of rule 2: a small square that blinks.
1416/// Determinate is a trough with a fill, drawn as a single gradient whose stop is
1417/// `--awaiting-share`, a plain number from 0 to 1 that the binder sets from
1418/// bytes it has actually watched land. A determinate control with nothing
1419/// setting the share draws an empty trough rather than a full one, which is the
1420/// honest reading: the size is known and the delivery is not.
1421///
1422/// **What the bar may not do**, from rule 1 and from `Awaiting`'s own docs:
1423/// what is done over what there is, and never a remaining time, an arrival time
1424/// or a rate extrapolated forward. Nothing here can express one, which is
1425/// deliberate — the only input is a share of a measured payload.
1426///
1427/// # Sizes, and the deferral rule
1428///
1429/// `progress_rules` emits the tones and never the width, because the width is
1430/// not this crate's to know. A pseudo-element has no intrinsic size at all, so
1431/// the same treatment would render nothing anywhere. Both sizes are therefore
1432/// custom properties with defaults: an app that wants a different mark sets
1433/// `--awaiting-mark` and `--awaiting-bar` once, and one that says nothing gets a
1434/// mark that is visible.
1435///
1436/// # The cadence, and what happens without it
1437///
1438/// `--cadence-activity` comes from `makeover-timing` through `makeover-build`,
1439/// and is a half-period, so a full cycle is twice it. It is used bare rather
1440/// than with a fallback: a number written here would be a second heartbeat for
1441/// a mark three renderers draw.
1442///
1443/// A sheet assembled without the time axis leaves `animation-duration` invalid,
1444/// which resolves to `0s`, which runs no animation and leaves the base style —
1445/// a lit, still mark. That is also exactly what the reduced-motion block does,
1446/// since it sets the cadence to `0ms`. Both fall out of one rule because the
1447/// base style is lit and the keyframes do the dimming, which is the ordering
1448/// `makeover_timing::reduced_motion_css` asks its consumers for by name.
1449fn awaiting_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1450    let mut css = String::new();
1451
1452    // Dimming rather than lighting, so a zero-length animation leaves a lit
1453    // mark rather than a blank one. See `makeover_timing::reduced_motion_css`.
1454    css.push_str(
1455        "@keyframes makeover-activity {\n    \
1456         0%, 49.99% {\n        background: var(--action);\n    }\n    \
1457         50%, 100% {\n        background: var(--surface-sunken);\n    }\n\
1458         }\n",
1459    );
1460
1461    // Nothing is drawn until something is waiting. `content` on the base rule
1462    // rather than on the busy one keeps the box the same box across the
1463    // transition, so a mark appearing does not reflow the line it is in.
1464    let _ = writeln!(
1465        css,
1466        "[data-awaiting]::after {{\n    \
1467         content: \"\";\n    \
1468         display: none;\n    \
1469         margin-inline-start: var(--awaiting-gap, 0.5ch);\n    \
1470         vertical-align: baseline;\n\
1471         }}"
1472    );
1473
1474    let _ = writeln!(
1475        css,
1476        "[data-awaiting][aria-busy=\"true\"]::after {{\n    \
1477         display: inline-block;\n    \
1478         inline-size: var(--awaiting-mark, 0.5em);\n    \
1479         block-size: var(--awaiting-mark, 0.5em);\n    \
1480         background: var(--action);\n    \
1481         opacity: 1;\n    \
1482         animation: makeover-activity calc(var(--cadence-activity) * 2) \
1483         step-end infinite;\n\
1484         }}"
1485    );
1486
1487    // The measured half. A wider box, no blink, and a gradient whose stop is
1488    // the share: the fill and the trough in one paint, so the markup stays one
1489    // pseudo-element on both branches.
1490    //
1491    // `--awaiting-share` unset is an empty trough, not a full one. A bar that
1492    // read full because nobody was counting would be the confidently-wrong
1493    // drawing rule 1 exists to forbid.
1494    //
1495    // The trough takes an edge for the reason a well does: a bar at zero share
1496    // is otherwise a rectangle of the surface it sits on, which is nothing at
1497    // all. `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` and
1498    // `track_rules` write theirs.
1499    let _ = writeln!(
1500        css,
1501        "[data-awaiting=\"determinate\"][aria-busy=\"true\"]::after {{\n    \
1502         inline-size: var(--awaiting-bar, 6em);\n    \
1503         animation: none;\n    \
1504         outline: {} solid var(--border);\n    \
1505         outline-offset: -{};\n    \
1506         background: linear-gradient(\n        \
1507         to inline-end,\n        \
1508         var(--action) 0 calc(var(--awaiting-share, 0) * 100%),\n        \
1509         var(--surface-sunken) 0\n    \
1510         );\n\
1511         }}",
1512        opts.border_width, opts.border_width
1513    );
1514
1515    css
1516}
1517
1518/// A strip of figures, and the two spans inside each one.
1519///
1520/// Colour only, which is the deferral rule applied to a component that badly
1521/// wants to break it. A figure reads as a figure because the value is set large
1522/// over a small caption, and that is a size: `makeover-geometry` answers how
1523/// much space and this crate answers what the thing is. Emitting `font-size`
1524/// here would be this crate naming a value, which is the one thing it is defined
1525/// by not doing, and `progress_rules` is the precedent — it emits the tones and
1526/// never the width, because the width is not its to know.
1527///
1528/// So the arrangement and the type scale are the app's, and what is generated is
1529/// the part an app cannot get right by itself: which of the two spans carries
1530/// the tone.
1531fn figure_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1532    let figure = class("figure", opts);
1533    let value = class("figure-value", opts);
1534    let caption = class("figure-caption", opts);
1535    let change = class("figure-change", opts);
1536    let mut css = String::new();
1537
1538    // `content` literally. A figure's value is the thing itself, at full
1539    // weight -- wiki `three-tone-convention` classes it "active, emphasised",
1540    // and both other renderers already draw it that way (makeover-tui
1541    // `piece.rs:391` bold, makeover-immediate `widget.rs:244`). It reached
1542    // here through `Tone::Neutral.token()` and came out `content-muted`, so
1543    // the headline number sat at the colour of its own caption.
1544    let _ = writeln!(
1545        css,
1546        ".{figure} > .{value} {{\n    color: var(--content);\n}}"
1547    );
1548    let _ = writeln!(
1549        css,
1550        ".{figure} > .{caption} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1551    );
1552    let _ = writeln!(
1553        css,
1554        ".{figure} > .{change} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1555    );
1556
1557    // A toned figure tones one part and never the caption. The caption is the
1558    // noun and stays muted.
1559    //
1560    // Which part depends on whether there is a change, and that is the whole of
1561    // what 0.13.0 changed here. A figure with a delta is an ordinary number that
1562    // has moved in a direction worth reading, so the delta takes the colour and
1563    // the number stays plain; a figure without one has nowhere else to put it.
1564    // `:has` is what lets one attribute mean both, and the alternative was the
1565    // emitter deciding by writing the attribute onto a different element, which
1566    // leaves two elements able to disagree about a figure's one meaning.
1567    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1568        let _ = writeln!(
1569            css,
1570            ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{change} {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1571            tone.token()
1572        );
1573        let _ = writeln!(
1574            css,
1575            ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"]:not(:has(> .{change})) > .{value} \
1576             {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1577            tone.token()
1578        );
1579    }
1580    css
1581}
1582
1583/// A picture, its frame and its caption.
1584///
1585/// # The frame is a border, and this is the one place a bevel is wrong
1586///
1587/// Emitting [`Depth::Raised`] here through [`depth_rule`], the same call
1588/// `button` and `card` make, is wrong, and MNW's landing page is where it
1589/// showed: **the frames had no visible edge at all.**
1590///
1591/// `Depth::Raised`'s edge is `--bevel-raised`, which is an *inset* shadow — a
1592/// 1px light run at the top-left and a dark one at the bottom-right, drawn
1593/// **inside** the element's box. On a button or a card that box is a surface
1594/// this crate owns, so an inset edge reads as the surface catching the light.
1595/// On a picture it is drawn on top of the picture, over whatever pixels the
1596/// image happens to have at its border. MNW's screenshots are light-on-light
1597/// parchment, so the light half landed on a light image and the frame
1598/// disappeared.
1599///
1600/// **You cannot bevel a surface you do not own.** A picture's content is the
1601/// app's, arrives at request time, and can be any colour, so its edge has to
1602/// sit *outside* the content rather than on it. That is a border.
1603///
1604/// The fill stays, and it is not decoration: it is what shows through a
1605/// transparent PNG and what stands in the frame's place while the image is
1606/// still loading.
1607///
1608/// This is a real limit on [`Depth`] rather than a special case. Every other
1609/// consumer of a depth draws its own surface; a picture is the first member
1610/// whose surface belongs to someone else.
1611///
1612/// # No size
1613///
1614/// `width: 100%` and nothing else. How large a picture is depends on the box it
1615/// was put in, which is the app's arrangement and `makeover-geometry`'s scales,
1616/// and a renderer that picked one would be answering for every consumer at
1617/// once. This is where `figure_rules` landed for the same reason.
1618fn picture_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1619    let picture = class("picture", opts);
1620    let img = class("picture-img", opts);
1621    let caption = class("picture-caption", opts);
1622    let mut css = String::new();
1623
1624    // Block, or an inline image sits on the text baseline and carries a
1625    // descender's worth of space under it that no app ever wants and every app
1626    // deletes by hand. The border is the frame; see the type docs for why it is
1627    // not the bevel every other surface here gets.
1628    let _ = writeln!(
1629        css,
1630        ".{img} {{\n    display: block;\n    width: 100%;\n    height: auto;\n    \
1631         background: var(--{});\n    border: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1632        Fill::Raised.token(),
1633        opts.border_width
1634    );
1635
1636    // The two fits that need a rule. `Fit::Natural` emits no attribute at all,
1637    // so it is the bare rule above and needs nothing here.
1638    let _ = writeln!(
1639        css,
1640        ".{img}[data-fit=\"cover\"] {{\n    height: 100%;\n    object-fit: cover;\n}}"
1641    );
1642    let _ = writeln!(
1643        css,
1644        ".{img}[data-fit=\"contain\"] {{\n    height: 100%;\n    object-fit: contain;\n}}"
1645    );
1646
1647    // A caption reads back one step, which is `figure-caption`'s answer and the
1648    // same claim: it says what the thing above it is, and it is not the thing.
1649    let _ = writeln!(
1650        css,
1651        ".{picture} > .{caption} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1652    );
1653
1654    css
1655}
1656
1657/// A region showing one child at a time, and the chrome that moves between them.
1658///
1659/// [`makeover_layout::Showing`] lets a description say that a region holds
1660/// several children and shows some of them. A renderer derives its own chrome
1661/// from that, which is what stops every renderer growing a `match` on a widget
1662/// name; these are the rules the derived chrome needs.
1663///
1664/// # Why the default is every child, and the enhancement takes them away
1665///
1666/// The controls are a lie until something binds them. A prev button rendered
1667/// into a document with no script is a control that looks live and answers
1668/// nothing, and the reader it lies to is exactly the one who cannot see the
1669/// other children either — the collapsing and the moving are the same half.
1670///
1671/// So the rules run in the direction the enhancement does. Nothing here hides a
1672/// child and nothing here shows a control. Whatever binds the region sets
1673/// `data-ready` on it, and that is what collapses the stack to one and reveals
1674/// the row that moves it. A reader with no script gets every child in order and
1675/// no controls, which is more content rather than less, and a reader with
1676/// script gets a settled page rather than a stack that jumps to one frame after
1677/// load.
1678///
1679/// MNW proved this shape by hand — a `<noscript>` stylesheet opening its
1680/// carousel back out — and it is here rather than there because the property is
1681/// the description's, not one app's.
1682///
1683/// # Not spacing
1684///
1685/// The row's gaps are `makeover-geometry`'s question and are absent for
1686/// [`row_rules`]'s reason. What is here is `display`, which carries no
1687/// magnitude, and the muted readout, which is the same claim `picture-caption`
1688/// makes: it says where you are among the children and it is not one of them.
1689fn showing_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1690    let controls = class("showing", opts);
1691    let position = class("showing-position", opts);
1692    let frame = class("showing-frame", opts);
1693    let mut css = String::new();
1694
1695    // Hidden until something binds it, which is the whole argument above.
1696    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{controls} {{\n    display: none;\n}}");
1697    // Block, and nothing about how the three sit in it. A button and a span are
1698    // inline already, so they make a row without this crate saying so, and
1699    // saying so is where `align-items` and a gap would follow -- both spacing,
1700    // both `makeover-geometry`'s, and `row_rules` refuses them for the same
1701    // reason.
1702    let _ = writeln!(
1703        css,
1704        "[data-ready] > .{controls} {{\n    display: block;\n}}"
1705    );
1706
1707    // A child is in flow until the region is bound, and then only the current
1708    // one is. `.current` is a modifier for the reason `.chosen` and `.latched`
1709    // are: one name for the state, set by whoever knows it.
1710    let _ = writeln!(
1711        css,
1712        "[data-ready] > .{frame}:not(.current) {{\n    display: none;\n}}"
1713    );
1714
1715    // Reads back one step. `picture-caption`'s rule and its reason.
1716    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{position} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1717
1718    css
1719}
1720
1721/// A time axis: the container, its gridlines and ruler, and the placed things.
1722///
1723/// [`Track`](makeover_layout::Track), the one member here whose whole point is
1724/// *position*. That makes the magnitude line this crate keeps worth restating
1725/// rather than assuming.
1726///
1727/// # Where the numbers come from
1728///
1729/// Every value that varies per item is a custom property the caller sets
1730/// inline, and every rule here reads one. `--track-at` and `--track-for` are
1731/// percentages of the span, which
1732/// [`Track::fraction`](makeover_layout::Track::fraction) computes once so three
1733/// renderers cannot disagree about it. Nothing here knows a pixel.
1734///
1735/// That is what lets the stylesheet stay static while the items move: an entry
1736/// carries `style="--track-at: 37.5%; --track-for: 4.166%"` and the rule below
1737/// turns it into a box. The alternative was emitting a rule per item, which is
1738/// a stylesheet that grows with the data.
1739///
1740/// **The height of the track is the app's**, not this crate's. 96 quarter-hour
1741/// slots at some slot height is a size, and a size is `makeover-geometry`'s
1742/// question -- the same refusal `figure_rules` and `placeholder_rules` make.
1743/// Percentages need a resolved height above them, so `.track` gets
1744/// `position: relative` and nothing else; the app says how tall a day is.
1745///
1746/// # Overlap
1747///
1748/// Two things at the same time is intrinsic to an axis and has no analogue in a
1749/// list. The description does not declare it -- `Placement::overlaps` derives it
1750/// from the times -- so what arrives here is a lane index and a lane count, and
1751/// the rule divides the width. A renderer that would rather stack them ignores
1752/// both properties and the defaults give it one full-width lane.
1753fn track_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1754    let track = class("track", opts);
1755    let slot = class("track-slot", opts);
1756    let tick = class("track-tick", opts);
1757    let entry = class("track-entry", opts);
1758    let mut css = String::new();
1759
1760    // The positioning context every entry resolves against, and the whole of
1761    // what this crate says about the container. No height: see the doc above.
1762    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{track} {{\n    position: relative;\n}}");
1763
1764    // Gridlines and the ruler are the axis reading itself back, which is
1765    // `picture-caption` and `showing-position`'s claim: about the thing rather
1766    // than one of the things.
1767    //
1768    // `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` writes its
1769    // edge. A gridline is the one place a timeline would most naturally reach
1770    // for a hardcoded 1px, and a hardcoded 1px is this crate naming a size.
1771    let _ = writeln!(
1772        css,
1773        ".{slot} {{\n    border-top: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1774        opts.border_width
1775    );
1776    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{tick} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1777
1778    // The one rule that does real work. Top and height are the placement;
1779    // left and width are the lane. Both lane properties default so an entry
1780    // that names neither is full width, which is the common case and the one a
1781    // renderer gets for free.
1782    let _ = writeln!(
1783        css,
1784        ".{entry} {{\n    \
1785         position: absolute;\n    \
1786         top: var(--track-at, 0%);\n    \
1787         height: var(--track-for, 100%);\n    \
1788         left: calc(var(--track-lane, 0) / var(--track-lanes, 1) * 100%);\n    \
1789         width: calc(100% / var(--track-lanes, 1));\n\
1790         }}"
1791    );
1792
1793    css
1794}
1795
1796/// A region's stand-in, and the header of a table that can be reordered.
1797///
1798/// Both are colour and affordance only, the same place `figure_rules` lands:
1799/// emitting a type scale is not this crate's. How much room
1800/// a stand-in gets is a size — goingson has the same one at three, as
1801/// `--compact`, `--dashboard` and `--padded` — and a size is
1802/// `makeover-geometry`'s question.
1803///
1804/// The caret is the one thing here that is neither colour nor affordance, and it
1805/// is a renderer's own expression rather than a value the description named:
1806/// `aria-sort` is what the table actually says, and this turns it into something
1807/// visible for everyone not using a screen reader. A terminal draws its own; an
1808/// immediate-mode painter draws its own.
1809fn state_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1810    let placeholder = class("placeholder", opts);
1811    let text = class("placeholder-text", opts);
1812    let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1813    let mut css = String::new();
1814
1815    let _ = writeln!(
1816        css,
1817        ".{placeholder} > .{text} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1818    );
1819    // Only the failure is toned. An empty list is the normal state of a new
1820    // install, and `Readiness::tone` is what says so.
1821    let _ = writeln!(
1822        css,
1823        ".{placeholder}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{text} {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1824        Tone::Danger.token()
1825    );
1826
1827    // A header that reorders the table is a control, and the pointer is the
1828    // only part of saying so that is not the app's own type and spacing.
1829    let _ = writeln!(
1830        css,
1831        ".{heading}[data-sortable] {{\n    cursor: pointer;\n}}"
1832    );
1833    // The caret carries its own leading space, the way `makeover-tui` and
1834    // `makeover-immediate` both write `" \u{25B2}"`. It used to be emitted bare,
1835    // and both apps that adopted the vocabulary had to put the gap back in their
1836    // own stylesheets on the same afternoon -- each having to work out first that
1837    // app CSS outranks this crate's cascade layer, so adding the space the
1838    // obvious way, as `content`, silently wins over the glyph and leaves the
1839    // heading with no caret at all. A consumer should not have to know that, and
1840    // with the space emitted here there is nothing left for one to add.
1841    //
1842    // Three states, three tones, on the convention in wiki
1843    // `three-tone-convention`. A column in force is `content`; a column offering
1844    // to reorder and not doing it now is `content-secondary`, because it still
1845    // answers a press; a column that is not sortable emits no caret at all and
1846    // takes nothing. The idle arm used to hide its glyph and reserve the box,
1847    // which cost a reflow-free press and said nothing. It draws now, and the
1848    // reservation stops being a thing to get right.
1849    //
1850    // The glyph is `Sort::glyph`, escaped rather than written: a CSS `content`
1851    // string cannot carry the character literally through this file's own
1852    // escaping, and spelling it here as well would put the third copy back that
1853    // `makeover-layout` 0.27.5 exists to remove.
1854    //
1855    // On the heading's `.cell-in`, so the caret sits beside the label inside
1856    // its padding rather than at the far edge of a column that grew.
1857    let cell_in = class("cell-in", opts);
1858    let _ = writeln!(
1859        css,
1860        ".{heading}[data-sortable] > .{cell_in}::after \
1861         {{\n    content: \" {}\";\n    color: var(--content-secondary);\n}}",
1862        css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())
1863    );
1864    for direction in [Sort::Ascending, Sort::Descending] {
1865        let _ = writeln!(
1866            css,
1867            ".{heading}[aria-sort=\"{}\"] > .{cell_in}::after \
1868             {{\n    content: \" {}\";\n    color: var(--content);\n}}",
1869            direction.as_str(),
1870            css_escape(direction.glyph())
1871        );
1872    }
1873    css
1874}
1875
1876/// One declared `ch` of a column's floor, in `rem`.
1877///
1878/// A figure at a table's text size, 0.6em of seven eighths of the base, is
1879/// 0.525rem, and a floor that sized a date to exactly its ten figures ended it
1880/// in an ellipsis with the rest of the row to spare. Nine sixteenths keeps it
1881/// whole. `rem` rather than the CSS `ch` because a container condition resolves
1882/// a font-relative unit against a different font than the cell's.
1883const CH_REM: f32 = 0.5625;
1884
1885/// The frame a table sits in, and how it narrows.
1886///
1887/// # Nothing travels with the table
1888///
1889/// A table a description produced knows its columns at render time, so any rule
1890/// written per table would have to travel with the markup: a `<style>` element
1891/// beside it, which needs `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` and so blocks the MNW
1892/// server's standing plan to drop it, or the head, which a table swapped in by
1893/// htmx arrives without. So every rule here is written once, against classes a
1894/// cell carries.
1895///
1896/// # Flex rows, and priority as a shrink factor
1897///
1898/// Each row is a flex row and each column a flex item starting at its declared
1899/// floor, the `min-N` rung [`list::column_classes`] puts on it. The columns
1900/// line up across rows because every row's cells share one basis, grow and
1901/// shrink per column. When the table is short of room the browser takes the
1902/// shortfall in proportion to each column's shrink factor, and [`Priority`] is
1903/// that factor: optional columns give way first, secondary ones next, and an
1904/// essential column of a kind that cannot be cut short does not give way at all.
1905///
1906/// So a table narrows at the width its floors add up to, with no breakpoint and
1907/// no count of positions. That is the number `makeover-tui` counts in cells and
1908/// `makeover-immediate` budgets in points, which is what makes a description
1909/// drop a column at one declared width in every host.
1910///
1911/// A droppable column under its floor hides its contents, through a container
1912/// condition on the cell, so a column reads whole or blank and never as a
1913/// fragment. The condition cannot read a custom property, which is why the floor
1914/// is a class from a fixed ladder and the edges are written in per density.
1915fn table_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1916    let table = class("table", opts);
1917    let head = class("table-head", opts);
1918    let row = class("table-row", opts);
1919    let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1920    let cell = class("cell", opts);
1921    let mut css = String::new();
1922
1923    // The table model, wiki `table-model`: specimen C with D's header strip, as
1924    // Max picked it off rendered specimens. The table paints its own raised
1925    // ground inside a hairline frame, so the row tones hold whatever it sits
1926    // on. Text is the note size, 14px at the default base.
1927    let bw = opts.border_width;
1928    let cell_in = class("cell-in", opts);
1929    let _ = writeln!(
1930        css,
1931        ".{table} {{\n    border: {bw} solid var(--row-rule);\n    \
1932         background: var(--surface-raised);\n    font-size: var(--text-note);\n}}"
1933    );
1934    // Flex rows, so priority can be a shrink factor and the browser narrows the
1935    // table itself: see "A table narrows itself" below. Every row's cells share
1936    // one basis, grow and shrink per column, which is what lines the columns up
1937    // across rows without a table layout doing it.
1938    let _ = writeln!(
1939        css,
1940        ".{table} .{head},\n.{table} .{row} {{\n    display: flex;\n}}"
1941    );
1942    // A minimum rather than a height, since a row grows to fit its tallest
1943    // cell: a cell holding more than a line grows the row.
1944    let _ = writeln!(
1945        css,
1946        ".{table} .{row} {{\n    min-height: var(--row-block);\n}}"
1947    );
1948
1949    // One column, heading or cell: a flex item that starts at its floor
1950    // (`.min-N` below), grows if it fills, and gives room up by what it is
1951    // worth. `min-width: 0` lets it reach nothing, and it clips, so the padding
1952    // on `.cell-in` never lingers as a gap once the column has closed.
1953    //
1954    // A size container, so a droppable column can ask whether it is under its
1955    // own floor and show nothing rather than a fragment. Type goes on
1956    // `.cell-in`, so a heading and the cells under it are one box apart from
1957    // what they hold.
1958    //
1959    // A declared `ch` is drawn as `CH_REM`, in `rem`, in the basis and in the
1960    // container condition both. The CSS `ch` would be read off the cell by the
1961    // basis and off another font by the condition, so a column would hide at
1962    // one width while being sized at another: measured, three columns went
1963    // blank at 520px with room for all of them.
1964    let _ = writeln!(
1965        css,
1966        ".{table} .{heading},\n.{table} .{cell} {{\n    display: flex;\n    \
1967         align-items: center;\n    flex: 0 1 calc({}rem + 2 * var(--gap-group));\n    \
1968         min-width: 0;\n    overflow: hidden;\n    container-type: inline-size;\n}}",
1969        8.0 * CH_REM
1970    );
1971    let _ = writeln!(
1972        css,
1973        ".{table} .{cell_in} {{\n    flex: 1 1 auto;\n    min-width: 0;\n    \
1974         overflow: hidden;\n    text-overflow: ellipsis;\n}}"
1975    );
1976
1977    // The header strip. Its ink goes on the heading row and is inherited,
1978    // because `state_rules` colours the sort caret on `.cell-in::after` and a
1979    // colour on the heading itself would override it. `content-secondary`
1980    // rather than muted: the strip separates the header now, so the label does
1981    // not have to stay quiet by being pale. The edge sits under the strip, as
1982    // in the specimen. The strip is on the row as well as on each heading, so a
1983    // table whose columns do not fill its width has no gap in it, and on each
1984    // heading so one that sticks while the rows scroll under it stays opaque.
1985    // Tracking is typography's to own and nothing in the family owns it yet, so
1986    // it is a property with the specimen's value behind it.
1987    let _ = writeln!(
1988        css,
1989        ".{table} .{head} {{\n    color: var(--content-secondary);\n    \
1990         background: var(--surface-sunken);\n}}"
1991    );
1992    let _ = writeln!(
1993        css,
1994        ".{table} .{heading} {{\n    align-items: flex-end;\n    \
1995         background: var(--surface-sunken);\n    border-bottom: {bw} solid var(--bevel-dark);\n}}"
1996    );
1997    let _ = writeln!(
1998        css,
1999        ".{table} .{heading} > .{cell_in} {{\n    padding: var(--gap-peer) var(--gap-group);\n    \
2000         font-size: var(--text-fine);\n    font-weight: bold;\n    \
2001         letter-spacing: var(--table-heading-tracking, 0.06em);\n    \
2002         text-transform: uppercase;\n    text-align: start;\n    white-space: nowrap;\n}}"
2003    );
2004
2005    // Rows: a hairline between rows, a stripe on alternate rows, and a hover,
2006    // at every row count. Between rows and not above the first, where the
2007    // header's edge already draws the line.
2008    let _ = writeln!(
2009        css,
2010        ".{table} .{row} > .{cell} > .{cell_in} {{\n    padding: var(--gap-bound) var(--gap-group);\n}}"
2011    );
2012    let _ = writeln!(
2013        css,
2014        ".{table} .{row} + .{row} {{\n    border-top: {bw} solid var(--row-rule);\n}}"
2015    );
2016    // Parity of rows, never position of columns: the stripe alternates by what
2017    // a row is, and `of .{row}` keeps a header row out of the count.
2018    let _ = writeln!(
2019        css,
2020        ".{table} .{row}:nth-child(even of .{row}) {{\n    background: var(--row-stripe);\n}}"
2021    );
2022    let _ = writeln!(
2023        css,
2024        "@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine) {{\n    \
2025         .{table} .{row}:hover {{\n        background: var(--row-hover);\n    }}\n}}"
2026    );
2027
2028    let [
2029        kind_identifier,
2030        kind_date,
2031        kind_number,
2032        kind_status,
2033        kind_actions,
2034        kind_code,
2035    ] = [
2036        "kind-identifier",
2037        "kind-date",
2038        "kind-number",
2039        "kind-status",
2040        "kind-actions",
2041        "kind-code",
2042    ]
2043    .map(|name| class(name, opts));
2044    // Column kinds, wiki `table-model`. The class is on the heading and on
2045    // every cell. A heading takes the column's alignment and nowrap, so it lines
2046    // up with what is under it, and keeps the header's own type: the face and
2047    // figures a kind sets go on its cells. Prose has no class and no rule.
2048    let _ = writeln!(
2049        css,
2050        ".{table} .{cell}.{kind_identifier} > .{cell_in} {{\n    font-family: var(--font-mono);\n    \
2051         font-size: var(--text-fine);\n    overflow-wrap: anywhere;\n}}"
2052    );
2053    let _ = writeln!(
2054        css,
2055        ".{table} .{kind_date} > .{cell_in} {{\n    white-space: nowrap;\n}}\n\
2056         .{table} .{cell}.{kind_date} > .{cell_in} {{\n    font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums;\n}}"
2057    );
2058    let _ = writeln!(
2059        css,
2060        ".{table} .{kind_number} > .{cell_in} {{\n    white-space: nowrap;\n    text-align: end;\n}}\n\
2061         .{table} .{cell}.{kind_number} > .{cell_in} {{\n    font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums;\n}}"
2062    );
2063    let _ = writeln!(
2064        css,
2065        ".{table} .{kind_status} > .{cell_in} {{\n    white-space: nowrap;\n}}"
2066    );
2067    let _ = writeln!(
2068        css,
2069        ".{table} .{kind_actions} > .{cell_in} {{\n    white-space: nowrap;\n    text-align: end;\n}}"
2070    );
2071    let _ = writeln!(
2072        css,
2073        ".{table} .{cell}.{kind_code} > .{cell_in} {{\n    font-family: var(--font-mono);\n    \
2074         white-space: pre;\n}}"
2075    );
2076    // A table holding code is read as code: one row per source line, where a
2077    // stripe, a padded block and a 45px row each break the reading. So it
2078    // keeps the frame and the header and drops the record treatment. Keyed on
2079    // the kind being present, which the table's own markup already says.
2080    //
2081    // And it never clips a line. The code column is sized by what it holds,
2082    // takes no part in narrowing, and the table scrolls sideways instead: a
2083    // source line cut short is a different line.
2084    let code = format!(".{table}:has(.{kind_code})");
2085    let _ = writeln!(
2086        css,
2087        "{code} {{\n    overflow-x: auto;\n}}\n\
2088         {code} .{head},\n{code} .{row} {{\n    min-width: max-content;\n}}\n\
2089         {code} .{row} {{\n    min-height: auto;\n    align-items: baseline;\n}}\n\
2090         {code} .{row} + .{row} {{\n    border-top: 0;\n}}\n\
2091         {code} .{row} > .{cell} > .{cell_in} {{\n    padding-block: 0;\n}}\n\
2092         {code} .{cell}.{kind_code},\n{code} .{heading}.{kind_code} {{\n    \
2093         flex: 1 0 auto;\n    overflow: visible;\n    container-type: normal;\n}}\n\
2094         {code} .{row}:nth-child(even of .{row}) {{\n    background: none;\n}}"
2095    );
2096    let _ = writeln!(
2097        css,
2098        "@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine) {{\n    \
2099         {code} .{row}:hover {{\n        background: none;\n    }}\n}}"
2100    );
2101    // A fill column takes the slack; a content or fixed one stays at its floor
2102    // and keeps its value on one line rather than being given less by wrapping.
2103    // Scoped under `.{table}` for the reason every rule here is: the model is
2104    // what a cell takes by being in a table, and `.table .cell` at (0,2,0)
2105    // would outrank a bare class.
2106    let _ = writeln!(
2107        css,
2108        ".{table} .{} {{\n    flex-grow: 1;\n}}",
2109        class("cell-fill", opts)
2110    );
2111    let _ = writeln!(
2112        css,
2113        ".{table} .{} > .{cell_in},\n.{table} .{} > .{cell_in} {{\n    white-space: nowrap;\n}}",
2114        class("cell-content", opts),
2115        class("cell-fixed", opts)
2116    );
2117
2118    // A table narrows itself. Priority is how much room a column gives up when
2119    // the table runs out of it: the browser takes the shortfall from optional
2120    // columns until they reach nothing, then from secondary ones, and an
2121    // essential column only gives up what a thousandth of the others would.
2122    // No breakpoint and nothing per table, so a described table narrows at the
2123    // width its own floors add up to, which is the number the terminal counts
2124    // in cells and the immediate-mode painter budgets in points.
2125    //
2126    // An essential column of a kind that cannot be cut short does not shrink at
2127    // all: a control, a figure, a date or a state truncated is wrong rather than
2128    // short. `ColumnKind::holds_minimum` names them, so the list is the
2129    // description's rather than this sheet's.
2130    let [drops_first, drops_next, keeps] =
2131        ["cell-drops-first", "cell-drops-next", "cell-keeps"].map(|name| class(name, opts));
2132    let _ = writeln!(
2133        css,
2134        ".{table} .{drops_first} {{\n    flex-shrink: 1000000;\n}}\n\
2135         .{table} .{drops_next} {{\n    flex-shrink: 1000;\n}}"
2136    );
2137    let holding: Vec<String> = [
2138        makeover_layout::ColumnKind::Text,
2139        makeover_layout::ColumnKind::Identifier,
2140        makeover_layout::ColumnKind::Date,
2141        makeover_layout::ColumnKind::Number,
2142        makeover_layout::ColumnKind::Code,
2143        makeover_layout::ColumnKind::Status,
2144        makeover_layout::ColumnKind::Actions,
2145    ]
2146    .into_iter()
2147    .filter(|kind| kind.holds_minimum())
2148    .filter_map(list::kind_class)
2149    .map(|name| format!(".{}", class(name, opts)))
2150    .collect();
2151    let _ = writeln!(
2152        css,
2153        ".{table} .{keeps}:is({}) {{\n    flex-shrink: 0;\n}}",
2154        holding.join(", ")
2155    );
2156
2157    // The floors, as a ladder. `Column::floor` is even and at most
2158    // `MIN_CEILING`, so every floor a description can reach is one of these.
2159    let rungs = (2..=makeover_layout::MIN_CEILING).step_by(2);
2160    for n in rungs.clone() {
2161        let _ = writeln!(
2162            css,
2163            ".{table} .{} {{\n    flex-basis: calc({}rem + 2 * var(--gap-group));\n}}",
2164            class(&format!("min-{n}"), opts),
2165            f32::from(n) * CH_REM
2166        );
2167    }
2168
2169    // Whole or blank, never a fragment. A droppable column that has lost more
2170    // than one gap of its floor shows nothing, and its blank then closes over
2171    // the width it held.
2172    //
2173    // One gap and not none. The shrink factors order the tiers only nearly: a
2174    // secondary column gives up a fraction of a pixel while the optional ones
2175    // close, and a condition at the floor itself blanked it the moment they
2176    // started (measured, at 520px). One gap is far more than that leak and no
2177    // more than the column's own end padding, so whatever it holds overflows
2178    // into padding it still has rather than being cut.
2179    //
2180    // A container condition cannot read a custom property, so the gap is
2181    // written in rather than taken from `--gap-group`: once for the pointer
2182    // gap, and again under the touch condition where the gap is wider.
2183    for density in [Density::Pointer, Density::Touch] {
2184        let step = Gap::Group.step_at(density).ratio();
2185        let edge = f32::from(step.numerator) / f32::from(step.denominator);
2186        let mut block = String::new();
2187        for n in rungs.clone() {
2188            let _ = writeln!(
2189                block,
2190                "@container (inline-size < {}rem) {{\n    \
2191                 .{table} :is(.{drops_first}, .{drops_next}).{} > .{cell_in} {{\n        \
2192                 visibility: hidden;\n    }}\n}}",
2193                f32::from(n) * CH_REM + edge,
2194                class(&format!("min-{n}"), opts)
2195            );
2196        }
2197        match density {
2198            Density::Pointer => css.push_str(&block),
2199            Density::Touch => css.push_str(&gated(Some(density.media_condition()), &block)),
2200        }
2201    }
2202
2203    // What is inside a cell, which the table side could not say until
2204    // makeover-layout 0.14.0. Every cell was one `.cell` and one content
2205    // colour, so a button in a cell was painted as text -- the drift
2206    // `RowPart::intent` has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented
2207    // for nothing here.
2208    //
2209    // The colour goes on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell`, and that
2210    // placement is the whole fix. On the container it would cascade into the
2211    // tokens and the controls sitting beside the text, which is the bug said
2212    // in one rule; on the part that is text, it reaches text and stops.
2213    for part in [
2214        CellPart::Value,
2215        CellPart::Tokens,
2216        CellPart::Actions,
2217        CellPart::Link,
2218    ] {
2219        // Two of the four inherit: a token carries its own tone and an action
2220        // is a control rather than text. A link is text, the title of its row,
2221        // so it takes its intent like a value does. Left to inherit, it took
2222        // nothing: the colour is on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell`, and an
2223        // anchor with no colour of its own draws in the browser's link blue.
2224        //
2225        // Written as a skip-list rather than as a match on Value, so a member
2226        // added upstream gets its intent emitted rather than being silently
2227        // dropped. That is the same trade `part_class`'s fallback makes: land
2228        // plainly, never land as nothing.
2229        if !matches!(part, CellPart::Tokens | CellPart::Actions) {
2230            // The underline says "this goes somewhere" in running text. In a
2231            // table the row already says it, by being the thing that activates.
2232            let underline = if part == CellPart::Link {
2233                "\n    text-decoration: none;"
2234            } else {
2235                ""
2236            };
2237            let _ = writeln!(
2238                css,
2239                ".{} {{\n    color: var(--{});{underline}\n}}",
2240                class(cell_part_class(part), opts),
2241                part.intent()
2242            );
2243        }
2244    }
2245
2246    css
2247}
2248
2249/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
2250///
2251/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
2252/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
2253/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
2254#[must_use]
2255pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2256    let mut css = String::new();
2257    css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
2258    css.push_str(&link_rules(opts));
2259    css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
2260    css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
2261    css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
2262    css.push_str(&run_rules(opts));
2263    css.push_str(&progress_rules(opts));
2264    css.push_str(&chart::rules(opts));
2265    css.push_str(&awaiting_rules(opts));
2266    css.push_str(&figure_rules(opts));
2267    css.push_str(&picture_rules(opts));
2268    css.push_str(&showing_rules(opts));
2269    css.push_str(&track_rules(opts));
2270    css.push_str(&state_rules(opts));
2271    css.push_str(&table_rules(opts));
2272    css.push_str(&facet::facet_rules(opts));
2273    css.push_str(&form::editor_rules(opts));
2274    css.push_str(&form::suggestion_rules(opts));
2275    css.push_str(&form::unit_rules(opts));
2276    css.push_str(&form::option_detail_rules(opts));
2277    css.push_str(&form::note_rules(opts));
2278    css.push_str(&leaving_rules());
2279    css
2280}
2281
2282/// How a transient notice goes away.
2283///
2284/// `makeover-timing` says that `Intent::Dismiss` is how long a notice lives
2285/// *before it starts to leave*, and that the leaving itself is `Motion::Fade`.
2286/// `makeover-build` writes `--motion-fade` into every consumer's `timing.css`,
2287/// and this is the rule that reads it. Removing the node the moment the dismiss
2288/// is up skips the leaving entirely.
2289///
2290/// # Why an attribute and not a class
2291///
2292/// [`Emit`]'s prefix moves every class this crate writes, so a class here would
2293/// have to be resolved through `class()` by whoever sets it -- and the party
2294/// setting it is a script, which has no prefix to hand. `data-leaving` is
2295/// outside that namespace, so a renderer can set it from JavaScript with no
2296/// coordination.
2297///
2298/// The transition sits on the notice and the opacity on the leaving state, so
2299/// the element is transitionable before the attribute arrives; a transition
2300/// declared in the same rule as the value it changes has nothing to animate
2301/// from.
2302///
2303/// # Reduced motion is handled by the token, not by a second rule here
2304///
2305/// `timing.css` already zeroes `--motion-fade` under `prefers-reduced-motion`.
2306/// The reader who asked for less motion gets an instant change rather than a
2307/// fade, and the renderer that sets the attribute must still remove the node on
2308/// a timer rather than on `transitionend` -- a zero-length transition may fire
2309/// no event at all, and a node waiting on one that never comes stays forever.
2310///
2311/// The fallback is `0ms` and not a guessed duration: a page with no timing
2312/// sheet has not opted into this vocabulary, and the honest answer there is the
2313/// behaviour it had before, which is the notice going away at once.
2314fn leaving_rules() -> String {
2315    let mut css = String::new();
2316    let _ = writeln!(
2317        css,
2318        "[data-notice] {{\n    transition: opacity var(--motion-fade, 0ms) \
2319         ease-out;\n}}"
2320    );
2321    let _ = writeln!(css, "[data-notice][data-leaving] {{\n    opacity: 0;\n}}");
2322    css
2323}
2324
2325/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, in
2326/// [`CSS_LAYER`], under a generated-file banner.
2327///
2328/// The banner sits outside the layer, because a comment participates in no
2329/// cascade and a reader opening the file should see what it is before seeing
2330/// an at-rule.
2331#[must_use]
2332pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2333    let body = in_css_layer(&format!(
2334        ":root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
2335        bevel_properties(opts),
2336        depth_rules(opts),
2337        component_rules(opts)
2338    ));
2339    // Counted from the body rather than through `vocabulary::names`, which
2340    // calls back into here.
2341    let classes = vocabulary::classes_in_css(&body).len();
2342    let version = VERSION;
2343    format!(
2344        "/* Generated by makeover-webview {version} from makeover-layout, \
2345         {classes} classes.\n   \
2346         Do not edit. The version and the count are here because a stale\n   \
2347         lockfile fails silently: an older emitter writes a well-formed sheet\n   \
2348         with components missing, and nothing else in the file says so. If\n   \
2349         this version trails what the manifest asks for, re-resolve.\n\n   \
2350         Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n   \
2351         them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout.\n\n   \
2352         Everything below is in the `{CSS_LAYER}` cascade layer. Declare the\n   \
2353         order once in your own stylesheet, or this layer's position is decided\n   \
2354         by whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:\n\n   \
2355         @layer {CSS_LAYER}, base, components, responsive; */\n{body}"
2356    )
2357}
2358
2359#[cfg(test)]
2360mod tests;