Skip to main content

makeover_webview/
lib.rs

1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet
19//!
20//! This module emits component CSS and no markup, deliberately. GoingsOn has
21//! 145 `innerHTML` sites and Balanced Breakfast 175 `createElement` sites, so
22//! moving markup is a migration where adopting a generated stylesheet is not.
23//! The apps keep every line of their markup and gain the classes.
24//!
25//! It is not a deletion either, which this header claimed until the measurement
26//! came in. Adoption across goingson removed 49 declarations net and *added* 25
27//! lines: a rule loses its depth declarations and gains a variant selector next
28//! to it, so the file stays the same size. What phase A moves is where depth is
29//! defined, not how much CSS exists. Numbers and method in the wiki note under
30//! "The deletion test, run".
31//!
32//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
33//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
34//!
35//! # Phase B: the markup, one description at a time
36//!
37//! [`form`] renders [`makeover_layout::Field`], which is the half of phase B
38//! whose description is settled. It emits strings, because both apps
39//! interpolate their fields into larger string-built forms and returning nodes
40//! would rewrite those too. It owns its own escaping, on the reasoning in that
41//! module: a Rust encoder can cover element text and attribute values with one
42//! function, where the apps need four and have to choose correctly at every
43//! call site.
44//!
45//! [`facet`] renders `makeover_layout::Facet`: a dimension a set is narrowed by,
46//! and the one phase-B emitter whose markup an app is not keeping, because the
47//! markup it replaces was two mechanisms rather than one. A tag's selection and
48//! a tag's browse position were separate state on MNW's discover page, which is
49//! why every filter row there carries a tick box *and* a chevron; one gesture
50//! doing both is what lets the second one go.
51//!
52//! [`list`] is the other half: column tracks, the narrowing rules, and the cell
53//! containers a row is made of. It stops at the cell boundary and does not
54//! render what goes inside one, on the reasoning in that module. So phase B is
55//! now the frame around content in both directions, and what an app still owns
56//! is the content itself.
57//!
58//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
59//!
60//! Decided 2026-07-29 against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a
61//! component list. The useful finding there was that `.btn` (line 644),
62//! `.card` (768) and `.tag, .badge` (882) each hand-write the same
63//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
64//!
65//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
66//! not be described as a pure deletion:
67//!
68//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
69//!   [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
70//!   will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
71//!   and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
72//!   where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
73//!   hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
74//!   that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
75//!   answer is there and not here.
76//! - **Badges go flat.** See [`token_rules`].
77//!
78//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
79//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
80//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
81//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
82//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
83//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
84//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
85//!
86//! # 0.10.0: the states this crate used to leave to its consumers
87//!
88//! [`interactive_rules`] emitted hover and pressed and stopped, because
89//! `makeover-layout` modelled no interaction state. Focus and disabled were
90//! therefore unsayable, and every app completed the primitive from outside the
91//! only way that works: by out-specifying a rule it does not own. goingson
92//! carries 19 such rules and the MNW server 21, and the three focus rings do
93//! not match each other.
94//!
95//! That also blocked the cascade-layer work outright. An app that declares
96//! `@layer` puts its own rules in a named layer, and unlayered declarations
97//! outrank every named layer regardless of specificity, so all of those
98//! overrides lose in the commit that adopts layers. They cannot simply be
99//! deleted, because they are the only thing supplying the missing states.
100//! Emitting the states here is what turns that adoption into a deletion.
101//!
102//! Four states now, in emission order, and the order is load-bearing: they are
103//! all specificity (0,2,0), so disabled beats hover by coming last and by
104//! nothing else. Nothing here reaches for `:not(:disabled)`, which would raise
105//! a selector this crate will shortly be wrapping in its own layer.
106//!
107//! Hover additionally sits inside a capability query now. `makeover-touch`
108//! answers whether a fingertip has hover and `makeover-geometry` spells the
109//! condition; this crate asks and does not decide. goingson's section 60 exists
110//! solely to take the hover state back on touch, which is a fight it should
111//! never have been handed.
112//!
113//! # 0.11.0: the layer contract
114//!
115//! [`stylesheet`] emits into the `makeover` cascade layer ([`CSS_LAYER`], which
116//! lives in `makeover-geometry` because that is the one crate every CSS emitter
117//! in the family already depends on). `makeover-geometry` 0.6.0 does the same
118//! for `geometry.css`.
119//!
120//! The cascade resolves origin and importance, then layer, then specificity,
121//! then source order, and **unlayered normal declarations outrank every named
122//! layer**. So before this, an app that declared `@layer base, components,
123//! responsive` put every rule it owns into a named layer and lost all of them to
124//! this unlayered file, regardless of specificity and regardless of loading
125//! last. Nothing errors when that happens: the CSS is valid, the minifier is
126//! happy, and buttons and badges look subtly wrong.
127//!
128//! That is why the layer belongs here rather than in each app. An app cannot fix
129//! it from its own stylesheet, because the fix is to layer the file it does not
130//! own.
131//!
132//! **What it flips**, and the reason each app wants a look when it bumps the
133//! pin: a generated rule that currently beats an app rule by being more specific
134//! stops beating it. The direction is always "the app wins", which is what the
135//! apps already assume, but a hand-written rule an app thought was dead can come
136//! back to life.
137//!
138//! An app should declare the order once, or the layer's position is decided by
139//! whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:
140//!
141//! ```css
142//! @layer makeover, base, components, responsive;
143//! ```
144//!
145//! [`in_css_layer`] is re-exported for an app that assembles its own stylesheet
146//! from this crate's pieces. goingson builds `tables.css` in its own `build.rs`
147//! out of [`list::narrowing_css`] and [`list::grid_template_columns`], and those
148//! rules are as generated as the ones here, so they belong in the same layer and
149//! this crate cannot put them there on the app's behalf.
150//!
151//! # 0.12.0: the ring gets its own width
152//!
153//! [`focus_rule`] reused [`Emit::border_width`] and emitted a 1px ring. That was
154//! an implementation convenience dressed as consistency with the invalid-field
155//! ring: a bevel and a focus indicator answer different questions, and only one
156//! of them has to be noticed from across a desk.
157//!
158//! Caught while adopting 0.11.0 into goingson, by the check the adoption tasks
159//! ask for. Every consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose
160//! at least 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
161//! goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve selectors. The
162//! design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px, so deleting the app
163//! rules in favour of it would have thinned the focus indicator everywhere.
164//!
165//! [`Emit::focus_width`] now carries it, defaulting to `2px`, and the offset is
166//! the same magnitude with its sign off the depth. Both values are the measured
167//! consensus rather than a new opinion.
168//!
169//! # 0.57.0: a suggestion's second line, in place of a reason it cannot be picked
170//!
171//! `1fcf2e9b`, ruled by Max 2026-08-21. `Outcome::Suggestions` now carries
172//! `Candidate` rather than `Choice`, and a candidate has no `unavailable`: a
173//! suggestion that cannot be picked is a row a route should not have offered.
174//! What it has instead is a `detail`, the line that tells it from a row reading
175//! the same -- "Format" under audio, software, writing and video.
176//!
177//! So `.form-suggestion-why` is gone and `.form-suggestion-detail` is here, and
178//! the difference is not only the name. `why` was drawn in the disabled token,
179//! which said the row was refusing. A detail orients rather than refuses, so it
180//! is `--content-muted`, which is what every other secondary line in this crate
181//! reads as.
182//!
183//! No consumer is affected: the only emitter is `quasi-webview`, which moves in
184//! the same cascade.
185//!
186//! # 0.56.0: an interval, as the group MNW already wrote by hand
187//!
188//! [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Interval`] emits a `role="group"` named by the
189//! field's label, holding one `<input type="number">` per end. That is not a
190//! shape invented here: MNW's discover sidebar has a `role="group"` with
191//! `aria-labelledby` over `min_price` and `max_price` today, written by hand
192//! because nothing in the description could say the two boxes were one
193//! question. The markup is what the measurement found, and this emits it.
194//!
195//! - **The group carries the error and the descriptions**, on the split
196//!   [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Radio`] already uses here: what is wrong is
197//!   the answer, and a crossed interval is not the fault of either end.
198//! - **Both boxes take the whole extent.** `min`, `max` and `step` describe the
199//!   axis, so they are written twice. The crossing rule is not emitted, because
200//!   HTML has no attribute for it and the description does not carry it: it
201//!   comes back as an error on the group, like every other refusal.
202//! - **Which end is which is `aria-label` and nothing more.** The description
203//!   states direction structurally, by which member holds which name, and never
204//!   in words. Visible Min and Max captions are a page's own and reach the
205//!   group through [`form::Filling::trailing`].
206//!
207//! [`form::Value::Between`] is the second value. A separator inside one string
208//! would have made this crate the owner of a delimiter that either end could
209//! contain.
210//!
211//! # 0.55.0: a number's unit, as adjacent text
212//!
213//! `makeover-layout` 0.33.0's `Field::unit`. HTML has no unit attribute and
214//! inventing one would be markup nothing reads, so it is a `<span>` after the
215//! control -- and it is named in `aria-describedby` rather than left as
216//! decoration, because a number and what it is measured in are one fact and
217//! reading the first without the second is reading it wrong.
218//!
219//! This is the renderer the member costs something. egui already had somewhere
220//! better than the label to put a unit; here the two placements are equally
221//! adjacent, and what is bought is that the unit is a value a consumer can read
222//! back rather than a suffix on a label it would have to parse.
223//!
224//! # 0.54.0: a curve this renderer can carry, and one it cannot
225//!
226//! `makeover-layout` 0.32.0's `Curve`. A range takes its granularity from the
227//! curve now (`Field::curve.step()`), every other kind keeps `Field::step`, and
228//! `Curve::Linear` emits exactly what it emitted before.
229//!
230//! **A constant-ratio curve still emits a linear track, and that is a
231//! shortfall rather than a decision.** HTML has no logarithmic range input, so
232//! honouring one here means either shipping JS that maps the thumb position to
233//! a value -- renderer-side app code, which is the thing this stack exists to
234//! delete -- or changing what the control submits from a value to a fraction,
235//! and then something has to map it on the way back in. That something is not
236//! this crate: the MNW server reads these forms with its own handlers, so a
237//! fraction arriving where a value is expected would be silent. Filed rather
238//! than guessed at.
239//!
240//! What is not lost: the extent, the granularity, and the value's own units.
241//! What is lost is resolution at the small end, which is exactly the reason an
242//! app asked for a ratio in the first place. No consumer is affected today --
243//! every described range on this path is linear.
244//!
245//! # 0.52.0: a markdown field gets the preview it was permitted
246//!
247//! 0.50.0 marked a [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Rich`] field with
248//! `data-format="markdown"` and stopped there, and nothing read the mark: no
249//! rule, no markup, no selector anywhere in the tree. So a described editor was
250//! a plain textarea carrying an attribute, and MNW converting its four
251//! hand-written section editors onto the member would have *lost* the
252//! Write/Preview pair one of them already has. A permission taken and not spent
253//! turns every conversion into a regression.
254//!
255//! [`form::editor_rules`] and the chrome beside it are the spending. The pair is
256//! a segmented control, so it takes the depth, the focus ring and the chosen
257//! state from rules that already existed; the preview pane is a well, because it
258//! stands where the control stood. Both are gated on the attribute rather than
259//! on a class, which is what the attribute was for.
260//!
261//! **This crate still renders no markdown.** The pane arrives empty and is
262//! filled by whatever binds the editor, which is where the host's sanitiser
263//! already is. A converter here would have moved that guarantee into a crate
264//! with no view of the host's content-security posture.
265//!
266//! # 0.47.0: a range, a chooser's ghost text, and an option that cannot be
267//! picked yet
268//!
269//! `makeover-layout` 0.28.0's three form findings, all of them cheap here and
270//! none of them cheap in the app that found them.
271//!
272//! - `FieldKind::Range` emits `<input type="range">`, and `Field::step` emits
273//!   `step`. The step is emitted only when the description carries one: the
274//!   browser's own default is `step="1"`, which is what a description means by
275//!   saying nothing, and is also what turns a 0-to-1 threshold into a
276//!   two-position control.
277//! - A select with nothing chosen emits a disabled, selected, valueless first
278//!   option carrying `Field::placeholder`. HTML has no placeholder attribute on
279//!   `<select>`; this is the idiom, and `required` keeps working through it
280//!   because the option's value is empty.
281//! - `Choice::unavailable` emits `disabled` plus the reason. Where it goes
282//!   differs by control and the difference is forced: a radio group gets a
283//!   `.form-option-reason` span beside the label, and a `<select>` option has
284//!   room for no element at all, so the reason runs into its text.
285//!
286//! # 0.25.0: a cell says what it holds
287//!
288//! 0.23.0 gave a table its layout and left every cell the same. One `.cell`
289//! carried the whole thing, so a cell holding text and a cell holding a button
290//! were one class and one content colour, and a control in a cell was painted
291//! as text. That is the drift [`RowPart::intent`](makeover_layout::RowPart)
292//! has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented for nothing here.
293//!
294//! makeover-layout 0.14.0's [`CellPart`](makeover_layout::CellPart) names the
295//! four things a cell holds, and [`table_rules`] turns them into
296//! `.cell-value`, `.cell-tokens`, `.cell-actions` and `.cell-link`. Only the
297//! first takes a colour: a token carries its own tone, an action is a control
298//! rather than text, and a link takes the action colour from the anchor it is.
299//!
300//! The colour going on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell` is the fix rather
301//! than an implementation detail. On the container it cascades into the parts
302//! that are not text, which is the bug said in one rule.
303//!
304//! [`list::Cell::part`] is `Option<CellPart>` here, where it was
305//! `Option<RowPart>`. A table cell borrowing the list row's vocabulary was the
306//! drift with a type on it: the two answer different questions, and only one of
307//! them was ever about a cell.
308//!
309//! # 0.23.0: a table lays itself out, and a row shows its controls
310//!
311//! Three things a description could say and this renderer had no rule for,
312//! found together by rendering the MNW server's SSH-keys settings tab through
313//! `quasi` and preferring the hand-written Askama original.
314//!
315//! **A table had no layout at all.** [`list::narrowing_css`] emits the track
316//! list, and it has to be called with the columns, so it works where the
317//! columns are known at build time: goingson builds `tables.css` in its own
318//! `build.rs` and is untouched. A table a description produced knows its
319//! columns at render time, and the rules would have had to travel with the
320//! markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs `style-src
321//! 'unsafe-inline'` that the MNW server is working to drop, or the head, which
322//! an htmx fragment swap does not carry. [`table_rules`] lays a table out with
323//! `display: table` instead, which aligns columns across rows knowing nothing
324//! about how many there are. [`Priority`](makeover_layout::Priority) hiding
325//! moves from a generated rule per dropped column to one rule per drop class,
326//! and [`list::column_classes`] is what puts those classes on a cell. A header
327//! row emitted by a renderer's own code should call it too, or the header and
328//! the body disagree about which column just dropped.
329//!
330//! **A destructive button had nowhere for its tone to land.** `.button` carried
331//! no tone, on the reading that a control's colour is its surface. Every
332//! consumer had written the danger rule itself. It joins the badge in taking
333//! the four tones as colour, off `data-tone`.
334//!
335//! **A list rendered as a bulleted list**, because nothing here reset the `ul`
336//! a renderer emits for one.
337//!
338//! `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` also stops being honoured, which its own doc
339//! sanctioned: a renderer decides. It was retired outright in makeover-layout
340//! 0.13.0, once this had been its only consumer for a release. The rule hid a
341//! row's actions until hover,
342//! and every escape it grew was a report that hiding was wrong for somebody:
343//! `focus-within` for the keyboard, the capability gate for a fingertip with no
344//! way to unhide. What survived hid the controls from pointer users alone, who
345//! are the ones scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
346//!
347//! # 0.17.0: the depth classes stop being controls
348//!
349//! [`depth_rules`] gave `.raised` the whole interactive set. A depth is a
350//! statement about shape, so that left the vocabulary with no raised surface
351//! that is merely an object, and an app wanting one had two moves: write its
352//! own class from tokens, or take a control class and cancel the control half.
353//! goingson took the second, in three variants over sixteen elements
354//! (`.card--static` at 14 call sites, `.card--muted` at 2, `.card--shell` at 1),
355//! each re-asserting the resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`.
356//!
357//! Measured before changing it: `.raised` is emitted into goingson, Balanced
358//! Breakfast and the MNW server, and none of the three has a single call site.
359//! The states were unasked-for everywhere at once, and dropping them costs no
360//! migration anywhere.
361//!
362//! `.card` and `.button` are unchanged. They are the same depth *and* controls,
363//! and they take their states from [`surface_rules`], which is where a state
364//! belongs: on the thing that claims to answer a pointer.
365//!
366//! # Substitution, three ways
367//!
368//! `Fill::Well` has no colour on makeover before 2.3.0, and each renderer
369//! answers that differently, which is the evidence that dropping
370//! `Fill::fallback` from the description was right:
371//!
372//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
373//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
374//!   terminal would quantise the two together.
375//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
376//!   var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
377//!   decides anything.
378
379#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
380
381pub mod facet;
382pub mod figure;
383pub mod form;
384pub mod list;
385pub mod meter;
386pub mod placeholder;
387pub mod vocabulary;
388
389/// A render of every emitter, scraped for the classes it wrote.
390///
391/// Test-only, and the guard behind [`vocabulary::names`]. See the module's own
392/// header for why the check renders rather than reads the source.
393#[cfg(test)]
394mod corpus;
395
396use crate::list::{cell_part_class, part_class};
397use makeover_geometry::{Density, SizeClass};
398// Re-exported rather than redefined. An app assembling its own stylesheet out
399// of this crate's pieces needs the same layer name, and most such apps depend
400// on this crate and not on `makeover-geometry` directly: goingson builds
401// `tables.css` in its own build.rs from [`list::narrowing_css`], and those
402// rules are as generated as the ones here.
403pub use makeover_geometry::{CSS_LAYER, in_css_layer};
404
405/// This crate's version, as the generated stylesheet reports it.
406///
407/// A consumer whose lockfile still pins an old `makeover-webview` gets a
408/// well-formed sheet with components missing and no error anywhere, so the
409/// emitter has to name itself in what it writes. Read by
410/// `makeover_build::layout_css` through [`stylesheet`].
411pub const VERSION: &str = env!("CARGO_PKG_VERSION");
412use makeover_layout::{
413    Bevel, CellPart, Depth, Fallback, Fill, Flow, Intent, RowPart, Selector, Sort, State, Token,
414    Tone,
415};
416use makeover_touch::Affordance;
417use std::fmt::Write as _;
418
419/// How the emitted CSS is shaped.
420#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
421pub struct Emit {
422    /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
423    ///
424    /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: border widths belong to
425    /// `makeover-geometry` and will come from there once it carries them.
426    pub border_width: &'static str,
427    /// Focus ring thickness, as a CSS length.
428    ///
429    /// Separate from [`border_width`](Self::border_width), which it reused
430    /// until 0.12.0. That reuse was an implementation convenience dressed as
431    /// consistency, and it emitted a 1px ring: a bevel and a focus indicator
432    /// are answering different questions, and only one of them has to be
433    /// noticed from across a desk.
434    ///
435    /// The default is the measured consensus rather than a new opinion. Every
436    /// consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose at least
437    /// 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
438    /// goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve
439    /// selectors. The design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px.
440    pub focus_width: &'static str,
441    /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
442    pub class_prefix: &'static str,
443}
444
445impl Default for Emit {
446    fn default() -> Self {
447        Self {
448            border_width: "1px",
449            focus_width: "2px",
450            class_prefix: "",
451        }
452    }
453}
454
455/// A string as CSS escapes, for a `content` value.
456///
457/// `\u{25B2}` becomes `\25B2`. Emitted escaped rather than literally so the
458/// stylesheet is ASCII whatever the description spells: a `content` string is
459/// read by whatever encoding the consumer serves the file as, and a caret that
460/// depends on that is a caret that works on one machine.
461///
462/// Terminated by the closing quote at every site here. A CSS hex escape takes
463/// up to six digits and ends at the first character that cannot be one, so an
464/// escape followed by more text would need a space that these do not.
465fn css_escape(text: &str) -> String {
466    text.chars().fold(String::new(), |mut out, c| {
467        let _ = write!(out, "\\{:X}", c as u32);
468        out
469    })
470}
471
472/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
473#[must_use]
474pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
475    match bevel {
476        Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
477        Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
478    }
479}
480
481/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
482/// the intent may be absent.
483///
484/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
485/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
486#[must_use]
487pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
488    match fill {
489        Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
490        other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
491    }
492}
493
494/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
495///
496/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
497/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
498/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
499/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
500#[must_use]
501pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
502    let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
503    let w = opts.border_width;
504    format!(
505        "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} -{w} 0 var(--{})",
506        top_left.token(),
507        bottom_right.token()
508    )
509}
510
511/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
512///
513/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
514/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
515/// without the fill reads the property directly.
516#[must_use]
517pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
518    let mut css = String::new();
519    for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset] {
520        let _ = writeln!(
521            css,
522            "    {}: {};",
523            bevel_var(bevel),
524            bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
525        );
526    }
527    css.push_str(ELEVATION_PROPERTY);
528    css
529}
530
531/// The cast shadow of a surface that floats over the page.
532///
533/// Composed here for the reason the bevel pair is: `makeover` derives the tone,
534/// this crate owns the geometry, and neither has to know the other's numbers.
535///
536/// **Only for a surface that overlays the page.** A menu, a toast, a popover, a
537/// dropdown. A surface *in* the page takes `.raised` and its bevel, and a rule
538/// that reaches for this on a card or a plate has renamed a literal rather than
539/// replaced it.
540///
541/// Two lengths rather than one, because a single blur reads as a smudge at
542/// plate size and as a halo at menu size. The offset is small and downward: a
543/// Platinum-era menu sits just off the page rather than hovering above it.
544const ELEVATION_PROPERTY: &str =
545    "    --elevation-overlay: 0 2px 4px var(--elevation), 0 8px 24px var(--elevation);\n";
546
547/// The class name for a depth.
548#[must_use]
549pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
550    let name = match depth {
551        Depth::Flat => return None,
552        Depth::Raised => "raised",
553        Depth::Well => "well",
554        Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
555        // A depth added to the description since this renderer was last
556        // built. No class, on the same footing as Flat: emitting a name
557        // whose rule body we cannot write would put a class in the markup
558        // that the stylesheet never defines.
559        _ => return None,
560    };
561    Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
562}
563
564/// A prefixed class name.
565///
566/// Public since 0.27.0, for the renderers that emit markup this crate does not.
567/// A screen renderer writing `class="row"` has to prefix it the way the
568/// stylesheet half does or a prefixed app gets rules matching everything except
569/// the elements that renderer wrote, and the failure is invisible: the CSS
570/// stays valid and one element is unstyled. quasi-webview carried a byte
571/// identical copy of this function until it could call this one.
572#[must_use]
573pub fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
574    let mut out = String::with_capacity(opts.class_prefix.len() + name.len());
575    push_class(&mut out, name, opts);
576    out
577}
578
579/// A prefixed class name, written into a buffer the caller already has.
580///
581/// The form the emitters use, and the reason it exists is [`escape_into`]'s:
582/// every class on every element went through a `format!` before 0.40.0,
583/// including the default case where the prefix is empty and the answer is the
584/// argument. A described table row carried roughly eighty transient
585/// allocations, and this and the escaper were most of them.
586///
587/// [`class`] stays for callers holding a name rather than a buffer.
588///
589/// [`escape_into`]: crate::form::escape_into
590pub fn push_class(out: &mut String, name: &str, opts: &Emit) {
591    out.push_str(opts.class_prefix);
592    out.push_str(name);
593}
594
595/// The class an option of a selector carries, which is what the rules key off.
596///
597/// Named for the option and not for the group: [`selector_rules`] styles the
598/// thing that gets picked, so `Selector::Tabs` is `tab` and not `tabs`. The
599/// distinction is not pedantry. quasi-webview spelled these `tabs`, `segmented`
600/// and `option`, put `toggle` on the wrapping element rather than on the
601/// buttons inside it, and every described selector in that renderer came out
602/// with no depth, no focus ring and no chosen state, while the toggle group got
603/// a bevel meant for its buttons.
604///
605/// The chosen option additionally carries `chosen`, the same way a latched chip
606/// carries `latched`. That name is this crate's too; there is no reason for a
607/// caller to spell it, and [`selector_rules`] is where it is written down.
608#[must_use]
609pub fn option_class(selector: Selector) -> &'static str {
610    match selector {
611        Selector::Tabs => "tab",
612        Selector::Segmented => "segment",
613        Selector::Toggle => "toggle",
614    }
615}
616
617/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
618///
619/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
620/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
621/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
622/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
623///
624/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
625/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both, which this did before makeover-layout
626/// 0.3.0, silently dropped the fill for exactly that case. Independent does not
627/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
628/// disagree about what the region is.
629#[must_use]
630pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
631    let mut css = String::new();
632    if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
633        let _ = writeln!(css, "    background: {};", fill_var(fill));
634    }
635    if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
636        let _ = writeln!(css, "    box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
637    }
638    css
639}
640
641/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
642/// nothing.
643#[must_use]
644pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
645    let body = depth_declarations(depth);
646    if body.is_empty() {
647        return String::new();
648    }
649    format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
650}
651
652/// The media condition a hover rule has to sit inside, or `None` if hover is
653/// unconditional.
654///
655/// Two crates answer this and neither answer is made here. `makeover-touch`
656/// owns *whether* hover exists at a density, and `makeover-geometry` owns how
657/// that capability is spelled as a media condition. Asking both is what stops
658/// this renderer minting a third opinion, which is what all three apps did:
659/// goingson sniffed the user agent, Balanced Breakfast used `(hover: none)`
660/// alone, and the MNW server had no gate at all.
661///
662/// [`SizeClass`] is required by [`Affordance::available`] and ignored by this
663/// member, which reports as much through `reads_size`. Passing Compact is not
664/// a claim about width; the test below pins that every class agrees.
665fn hover_condition() -> Option<&'static str> {
666    if Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact) {
667        // A fingertip grew a hover state. Nothing to gate, and this renderer
668        // should not invent a reason to gate anyway.
669        None
670    } else {
671        Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition())
672    }
673}
674
675/// Put a rule inside a media query, or leave it alone.
676fn gated(condition: Option<&str>, rule: &str) -> String {
677    let Some(condition) = condition else {
678        return rule.to_string();
679    };
680    let mut css = format!("@media {condition} {{\n");
681    for line in rule.lines() {
682        // Blank lines stay blank. Indenting one leaves trailing whitespace,
683        // which is the sort of thing a formatter later reverts and calls a diff.
684        if line.is_empty() {
685            css.push('\n');
686        } else {
687            let _ = writeln!(css, "    {line}");
688        }
689    }
690    css.push_str("}\n");
691    css
692}
693
694/// The keyboard focus ring, placed by the depth it lands on.
695///
696/// This is the webview's **focus ring** and nothing more. **Reach** and
697/// **focus** are both the browser's — the document decides what is reachable
698/// and `:focus-visible` decides which reached thing wears the ring — and no
699/// description states either. The three terms are defined once in
700/// `makeover_layout`'s crate header, "Reach, focus and the focus ring".
701///
702/// One ring for the whole system, because a focus ring's job is to be
703/// recognised and three apps having three of them is the failure. What varies
704/// is where it sits, and that comes off [`Depth`] rather than off a per-
705/// component choice: a well takes the ring inside its own edge, and anything
706/// standing proud of the page takes it outside.
707///
708/// `outline` rather than the composed `box-shadow` the invalid-field ring at
709/// [`field_rules`] uses, and deliberately the one place the two rings are built
710/// differently. A `box-shadow` ring has to restate the bevel beside it, because
711/// `box-shadow` is not additive and a lone ring silently drops the well out
712/// from under the element. That restatement is a second copy of the depth,
713/// living in a different function from the first, and it is exactly the
714/// duplication `Depth` exists to prevent. `outline` occupies its own property,
715/// so the bevel survives untouched and there is nothing to keep in agreement.
716/// They render the same: both are a flush ring one border-width wide.
717#[must_use]
718pub fn focus_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
719    let w = opts.focus_width;
720    // Same magnitude either way, and only the sign comes off the depth. Both
721    // values are what the consumers had already converged on independently:
722    // 2px out is what all three wrote, and 2px in is the MNW server's own
723    // answer for the one inset ring it had.
724    let offset = match depth.bevel() {
725        // Inside the well, clear of its edge rather than painted over it.
726        Some(Bevel::Inset) => format!("calc(-1 * {w})"),
727        // Raised, or no edge at all. Outside, standing off by its own width.
728        _ => w.to_string(),
729    };
730    // The token by name. It is `makeover`'s, derived from the action colour,
731    // and reaching it through a description member was a second path to the
732    // same variable for as long as one existed.
733    format!(
734        ".{selector}:focus-visible {{\n    outline: {w} solid var(--focus-ring);\n    outline-offset: {offset};\n}}\n"
735    )
736}
737
738/// Present, visible, and not answering.
739///
740/// Matches the ARIA attribute as well as the pseudo-class, because `:disabled`
741/// only matches form elements and half the things this crate emits are not
742/// one: a `div` carrying `.chip` or `.tab` can never be `:disabled`. Keying on
743/// the accessible state is the pattern [`field_rules`] already establishes for
744/// `aria-invalid`, on the reasoning that one fact read by both the styling and
745/// the accessibility tree cannot drift from itself.
746///
747/// The rest depth is re-asserted rather than assumed, because this rule has to
748/// beat the hover and pressed rules above it. It does that on source order at
749/// equal specificity, not by out-specifying them: every rule this function's
750/// caller emits is (0,2,0), and adding a `:not(:disabled)` anywhere would raise
751/// one of them and have to be unpicked when this output moves inside its own
752/// cascade layer.
753#[must_use]
754pub fn disabled_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
755    format!(
756        ".{selector}:disabled,\n.{selector}[aria-disabled=\"true\"] {{\n{}    color: var(--{});\n    cursor: not-allowed;\n}}\n",
757        depth_declarations(depth),
758        State::Disabled.token()
759    )
760}
761
762/// Every state a selector that answers a click implies: hover, pressed, focus
763/// and disabled, in that order.
764///
765/// Order is the whole cascade mechanism here. All four selectors are
766/// specificity (0,2,0), so disabled wins over hover and pressed by coming last
767/// and by nothing else.
768///
769/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
770/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
771/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
772/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
773/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
774/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
775///
776/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
777/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
778/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
779/// consumed until now. What it *is* gated on is capability, via
780/// [`hover_condition`]. Before that gate existed the apps each wrote their own:
781/// goingson's section 60 exists solely to take back the hover state this
782/// function had just handed it, by out-specifying a rule it does not own.
783///
784/// `depth` is the selector's **rest** depth, used to place the focus ring and
785/// to restore the surface under a disabled control. The pressed rule keeps
786/// inverting from [`Depth::Raised`] regardless, which is what every caller got
787/// before this parameter existed: a tab's unchosen depth is
788/// [`Depth::Sunken`], and `Sunken.pressed()` is `Sunken`, so deriving the press
789/// from the rest depth would leave a tab with no press at all.
790#[must_use]
791pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
792    let mut css = gated(
793        hover_condition(),
794        &format!(".{selector}:hover {{\n    background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n"),
795    );
796    css.push_str(&depth_rule(
797        &format!("{selector}:active"),
798        Depth::Raised.pressed(),
799    ));
800    css.push_str(&focus_rule(selector, depth, opts));
801    css.push_str(&disabled_rule(selector, depth));
802    css
803}
804
805/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
806///
807/// A depth and nothing else. `.raised` says a surface sits on what is behind
808/// it, which is a statement about the shape and not about what happens when a
809/// pointer arrives, so it emits no hover, press, focus or disabled rule. The
810/// named surfaces are where interaction lives: `.card` and `.button` are the
811/// same depth *and* controls, and they get their states from
812/// [`surface_rules`].
813///
814/// This class carried the interactive set until 0.17.0, which left the
815/// vocabulary with no raised surface that is merely an object. Consumers that
816/// needed one took a control class and cancelled half of it instead: sixteen
817/// elements in goingson across three `.card--*` variants, each re-asserting the
818/// resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`. Nothing anywhere used
819/// `.raised` itself, so the states were unasked-for in every consumer at once.
820#[must_use]
821pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
822    let mut css = String::new();
823    for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
824        let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
825            continue;
826        };
827        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
828    }
829    css
830}
831
832/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
833///
834/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
835/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
836/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
837/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
838/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
839/// drifting apart again.
840fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
841    let mut css = String::new();
842    for name in ["button", "card"] {
843        let c = class(name, opts);
844        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, Depth::Raised));
845        css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, Depth::Raised, opts));
846    }
847
848    let field = class("field", opts);
849    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
850
851    // A field takes focus and refuses input like everything else here, and got
852    // neither until now, which is why all three apps hand-write a focus ring
853    // for it and no two of them match. No hover or pressed: a text field does
854    // not light up under the pointer and does not invert when clicked, so the
855    // two states `interactive_rules` would add are the two it does not have.
856    css.push_str(&focus_rule(&field, Depth::Well, opts));
857    css.push_str(&disabled_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
858
859    // Keyed on the ARIA attribute rather than on a class, so the visual state
860    // and the accessible state cannot drift apart: there is one fact and both
861    // read it. goingson already drove its invalid styling this way and was
862    // right to; the `.invalid` class this emitted before 0.5.0 was a second
863    // place to forget.
864    //
865    // The ring composes *after* the bevel rather than replacing it. box-shadow
866    // is not additive, so a lone ring silently dropped the well out from under
867    // an invalid field. Flat and unlit: this edge is saying "wrong", and
868    // lighting one side would have it say "raised" at the same time.
869    let _ = writeln!(
870        css,
871        ".{field}[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {{\n    box-shadow: var({}), 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
872        bevel_var(Bevel::Inset),
873        opts.border_width
874    );
875    css
876}
877
878/// Badges and chips.
879///
880/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
881/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
882/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
883/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
884/// decide which of the two it always was.
885///
886/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
887/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
888/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
889/// Text that goes somewhere.
890///
891/// The one inline control, and the vocabulary had no word for it until a
892/// description layer needed one. A table cell has carried `cell-link` since
893/// 0.14.0's part list, deliberately unruled because the cell's own rule covers
894/// it; what was missing is the same thing outside a table, which is what a
895/// described run holds when a sentence contains a link.
896///
897/// Colour and underline only. Whether a link is inline in a sentence or sitting
898/// on its own line is the app's layout, and how much room it takes is
899/// `makeover-geometry`'s. What is here is the pair of signals that say "this
900/// goes somewhere" and nothing that says where it sits.
901///
902/// The visited arm is deliberately absent. A link inside an app points at the
903/// app's own screens, which the user is expected to have been to, so painting
904/// them differently marks almost everything and distinguishes nothing.
905fn link_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
906    let mut css = String::new();
907    let link = class("link", opts);
908
909    let _ = writeln!(
910        css,
911        ".{link} {{\n    color: var(--action);\n    \
912         text-decoration: underline;\n}}"
913    );
914    // The hover step is the same one every other control takes, and it is a
915    // colour rather than a surface: a link has no box to raise.
916    let _ = writeln!(
917        css,
918        "@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine) {{\n    .{link}:hover \
919         {{\n        color: var(--action-hover);\n    }}\n}}"
920    );
921    let _ = writeln!(
922        css,
923        ".{link}:focus-visible {{\n    outline: {} solid var(--focus-ring);\n    \
924         outline-offset: 2px;\n}}",
925        opts.focus_width
926    );
927    // A link is often a `<button>` rather than an `<a>`: a renderer picks the
928    // element from the method, so a link that writes is a button that has to
929    // stop looking like one.
930    let _ = writeln!(
931        css,
932        "button.{link} {{\n    background: none;\n    border: none;\n    \
933         padding: 0;\n    font: inherit;\n    cursor: pointer;\n}}"
934    );
935    css
936}
937
938fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
939    let mut css = String::new();
940
941    // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
942    // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
943    let badge = class("badge", opts);
944    let _ = writeln!(
945        css,
946        ".{badge} {{\n    color: var(--{});\n}}",
947        Tone::Neutral.token()
948    );
949    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
950        let _ = writeln!(
951            css,
952            ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
953            tone.token()
954        );
955    }
956
957    // A button carries the four tones a badge does. It had none, on the reading
958    // that a control's colour is its surface rather than its text, and that
959    // reading has one hole big enough to matter: the button that destroys
960    // something. Every consumer had written that rule itself, and a description
961    // that says `Tone::Danger` on an act had nowhere for it to land.
962    //
963    // Colour and not a fill, matching the badge. A red surface is a decision
964    // about emphasis that belongs to an app's own layer, and two of them
965    // fighting is worse than neither.
966    let button = class("button", opts);
967    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
968        let _ = writeln!(
969            css,
970            ".{button}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
971            tone.token()
972        );
973    }
974
975    // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
976    // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
977    // markup and waits for phase B.
978    let chip = class("chip", opts);
979    let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
980    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
981    css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip, unlatched.depth(false), opts));
982    css.push_str(&depth_rule(
983        &format!("{chip}.latched"),
984        unlatched.depth(true),
985    ));
986    css
987}
988
989/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
990///
991/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
992/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
993/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
994/// three are not one member with a flag.
995///
996/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
997/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
998///
999/// Both states emit as of makeover-layout 0.3.0. Before it the description
1000/// named only the chosen option, so an unchosen one fell through to
1001/// [`Depth::Flat`] and nothing was drawn for it, which left goingson's tab
1002/// strip hand-writing the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
1003fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1004    let mut css = String::new();
1005    for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
1006        let c = class(option_class(selector), opts);
1007        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
1008        css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, selector.unchosen(), opts));
1009        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
1010    }
1011    css
1012}
1013
1014/// The parts of a list row.
1015///
1016/// The list is written out rather than derived because `RowPart` is
1017/// `#[non_exhaustive]` as of makeover-layout 0.9.0, so there is nothing to
1018/// iterate. A member added upstream emits no rule until it is named here, which
1019/// is the trade `non_exhaustive` makes: a silent gap instead of a build break.
1020/// [`part_class`] carries the same list and the same obligation.
1021fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1022    let mut css = String::new();
1023
1024    // The container the rows sit in. Three zeroes and a keyword, all of them
1025    // undoing a browser default the description never asked for: a described
1026    // list of SSH keys is not a bulleted list, and it rendered as one because
1027    // nothing here said otherwise. Not a size: there is no magnitude in it,
1028    // which is the line this crate holds.
1029    let _ = writeln!(
1030        css,
1031        ".{} {{\n    list-style: none;\n    margin: 0;\n    padding: 0;\n}}",
1032        class("list", opts)
1033    );
1034
1035    for part in [
1036        RowPart::Primary,
1037        RowPart::Secondary,
1038        RowPart::Meta,
1039        RowPart::Actions,
1040        RowPart::Tokens,
1041        RowPart::Proportion,
1042    ] {
1043        let c = class(part_class(part), opts);
1044
1045        // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
1046        // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
1047        // would be louder than saying nothing. Tokens answer alike, for their
1048        // own reason: each token carries its own tone, and a colour on the
1049        // strip would fight the things sitting in it. A proportion is the same
1050        // case again: the meter inside carries the tone.
1051        if !matches!(
1052            part,
1053            RowPart::Actions | RowPart::Tokens | RowPart::Proportion
1054        ) {
1055            let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n    color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
1056        }
1057
1058        // A row's actions are shown at rest. `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` said
1059        // otherwise and was not honoured here from 0.23.0; makeover-layout
1060        // 0.13.0 retired the method, so there is no longer a description saying
1061        // one thing and a renderer doing another.
1062        //
1063        // The rule was `opacity: 0` gated to pointer devices, revealed on
1064        // `:hover` and on `:focus-within`. Each escape it needed was a report
1065        // that hiding was wrong for somebody: `focus-within` because tabbing
1066        // could never reach an action; the gate because a fingertip had no way
1067        // to unhide, which both webview apps had already hand-written
1068        // `opacity: 1` to undo. What was left was a control hidden from
1069        // exactly one group: people using a pointer, who are also the group
1070        // scanning a list to find out what can be done to a row.
1071        //
1072        // A settings screen is where that reads worst: the whole reason to be
1073        // on it is to remove a key, and the button doing so was invisible
1074        // until pointed at. A table cell's actions were never hidden, so the
1075        // two arrangements now agree.
1076    }
1077
1078    // A part that may take two lines. `Flow::Tight` gets no rule: one line is
1079    // what a run already does, and restating it here would put a declaration on
1080    // every part in every row to say nothing.
1081    //
1082    // This is the shape both webview apps had already written by hand and
1083    // commented -- Balanced Breakfast on a feed row's title, goingson on a
1084    // problem's body -- which is the whole argument for the description
1085    // carrying it. `-webkit-` prefixed and unprefixed together: the prefixed
1086    // trio is what every engine actually implements, and `line-clamp` is the
1087    // standard property landing behind it.
1088    let _ = writeln!(
1089        css,
1090        ".{} {{\n    display: -webkit-box;\n    -webkit-box-orient: vertical;\n    -webkit-line-clamp: {lines};\n    line-clamp: {lines};\n    overflow: hidden;\n}}",
1091        class("row-relaxed", opts),
1092        lines = Flow::Relaxed.lines()
1093    );
1094
1095    css
1096}
1097
1098/// A row of things that share their space, and what each fallback gets here.
1099///
1100/// Ruling: wiki `layout-room-and-fallback`, Max 2026-08-18. The bug it answers
1101/// is goingson's `styles.css:702`, which pinned every `.page-header` over the
1102/// pill strip with `position: absolute` and so took the toolbar out of flow:
1103/// zero width contributed to the row it shared, nothing able to collide with
1104/// it, and therefore nothing preventing the collision. Rule 1 of the ruling is
1105/// that every described member is in flow, and these rules are how that is kept
1106/// rather than asked for.
1107///
1108/// # The floor, which is most of the fix
1109///
1110/// `.run > *` gets `min-width: min-content`. That is the derived minimum the
1111/// ruling asks for, in this renderer's own unit and stated by the browser
1112/// rather than by anybody: a member cannot be squeezed narrower than what is
1113/// in it, so members in one flow push each other instead of overlapping. It
1114/// costs no query and no number, and it is what fixes all four measured widths
1115/// whichever fallback the group declared.
1116///
1117/// # What each fallback gets, exactly
1118///
1119/// [`Fallback::Wrap`] is `flex-wrap: wrap`, which is exact. The browser wraps
1120/// the run when the members no longer fit, deciding that from their own
1121/// intrinsic widths, which is the derived minimum doing the whole job.
1122///
1123/// [`Fallback::Stack`] is wrap plus `flex: 1 1 max-content` on the members, so
1124/// a member that cannot sit beside its sibling takes a line of its own and
1125/// fills it. For the two-member run this was ruled on -- a tab strip and a
1126/// band -- that is precisely "a row becomes a column".
1127///
1128/// [`Fallback::Shed`] and [`Fallback::Menu`] get wrap, and this renderer is
1129/// honouring less than the description says. **CSS cannot express either one
1130/// without breaking the ruling's own first constraint.** Both need to know that
1131/// the run is out of room in order to take a member out of it, a container
1132/// query is the only construct that can ask, and `@container` compares against
1133/// a `<length>` -- there is no `@container (inline-size < min-content)`. So
1134/// every honest spelling of Shed here needs an authored breakpoint, which is
1135/// the thing the ruling exists to forbid, and the dishonest ones are worse: a
1136/// clamped height clips by document order rather than by [`Priority`], and
1137/// `display: none` under a viewport `@media` is the `nth-child(n+5)` bug the
1138/// vocabulary replaced.
1139///
1140/// Wrapping is the right thing to do instead. It keeps every member reachable,
1141/// which is the property that was actually broken -- goingson's new-contact
1142/// button left the viewport entirely at 560 -- and it keeps rule 1. A renderer
1143/// answering with less than was described is precedented and deliberate here:
1144/// [`makeover_layout::Region::Columns`] says a terminal stacking a board's
1145/// columns is honouring the description rather than degrading it.
1146///
1147/// The real mechanism needs the shed members to have somewhere to go, which is
1148/// markup and belongs to quasi-webview: an overflow control is a member of the
1149/// run, and the description does not yet say that a member *is* one. Filed
1150/// rather than guessed at.
1151fn run_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1152    let run = class("run", opts);
1153    let mut css = String::new();
1154
1155    // `flex-wrap: nowrap` is stated rather than left to the default, because
1156    // the fallbacks below are read as overrides of this line and a reader
1157    // should not have to know which way flexbox leans to see that.
1158    //
1159    // No gap. Spacing between members is the app's, the same way this crate
1160    // states no margins anywhere else; a gap here would be a size, and the one
1161    // hardcoded size in the mechanism is makeover-geometry's contact patch.
1162    let _ = writeln!(
1163        css,
1164        ".{run} {{\n    display: flex;\n    flex-wrap: nowrap;\n    align-items: center;\n}}"
1165    );
1166
1167    // The derived minimum, and the whole reason a member can no longer be
1168    // overlapped. `min-width: auto` is flexbox's default for a flex item and is
1169    // *not* the same thing: auto lets an item be compressed below its content
1170    // in a nowrap run, which is how a toolbar ends up drawn over a tab strip
1171    // even without anything leaving the flow.
1172    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{run} > * {{\n    min-width: min-content;\n}}");
1173
1174    for fallback in [
1175        Fallback::Wrap,
1176        Fallback::Stack,
1177        Fallback::Shed,
1178        Fallback::Menu,
1179    ] {
1180        let name = fallback_class(fallback);
1181        let c = class(name, opts);
1182        let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n    flex-wrap: wrap;\n}}");
1183        if matches!(fallback, Fallback::Stack) {
1184            let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} > * {{\n    flex: 1 1 max-content;\n}}");
1185        }
1186    }
1187
1188    css
1189}
1190
1191/// Every class [`fallback_class`] can return, plus the run itself.
1192///
1193/// [`ROW_PART_CLASSES`](crate::list::ROW_PART_CLASSES)'s reasoning and the same
1194/// obligation: a `match` over a `#[non_exhaustive]` enum cannot be enumerated
1195/// from outside, so the list sits beside it and a test holds the two together.
1196/// `run` is in it because it is emitted in its own right rather than only as a
1197/// fallback's fallback.
1198pub const RUN_CLASSES: &[&str] = &["run", "run-wrap", "run-stack", "run-shed", "run-menu"];
1199
1200/// The class a run carries for what it does when it is tight.
1201///
1202/// A run always carries `.run` as well, so an unrecognised fallback -- the enum
1203/// is `#[non_exhaustive]` -- lands as a plain nowrap row with the min-content
1204/// floor still under it. That is the safe failure: every member in flow and
1205/// none overlapped, which is the property, with only the rearrangement missing.
1206#[must_use]
1207pub fn fallback_class(fallback: Fallback) -> &'static str {
1208    match fallback {
1209        Fallback::Wrap => "run-wrap",
1210        Fallback::Stack => "run-stack",
1211        Fallback::Shed => "run-shed",
1212        Fallback::Menu => "run-menu",
1213        _ => "run",
1214    }
1215}
1216
1217/// The progress trough these rules fill.
1218///
1219/// This was renderer-local chrome with nothing behind it until makeover-layout
1220/// 0.10.0, which is the unusual order: the tones below were emitted for every
1221/// bar in the tree while the only way to describe one was to concatenate the
1222/// numbers into a heading. `Meter` is the word that arrived late, and
1223/// [`meter::meter_html`](crate::meter::meter_html) is what now fills these.
1224///
1225/// The rules stay a superset of what a description can ask for. An app drawing
1226/// its own bar keeps these classes, which is what the four goingson grew
1227/// independently were adopted onto.
1228///
1229/// The trough is a [`Depth::Well`], the same reading a text field gets:
1230/// something with its content down inside it.
1231fn progress_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1232    let progress = class("progress", opts);
1233    // `progress-fill` rather than a bare `fill`: an unprefixed build claims
1234    // these names in the app's own stylesheet, and `.fill` is grabby enough to
1235    // catch things that have nothing to do with progress. goingson already
1236    // calls it `.progress-fill`, so this is also the name that deletes.
1237    let fill = class("progress-fill", opts);
1238    let mut css = depth_rule(&progress, Depth::Well);
1239
1240    // The untoned bar is `--action`, not [`Tone::Neutral`]. That is the one
1241    // place this differs from the badge rules, and deliberately: a badge with
1242    // no status is a muted label, while a bar with no status is still
1243    // reporting progress, and `content-muted` would read as disabled.
1244    let _ = writeln!(
1245        css,
1246        ".{progress} > .{fill} {{\n    background: var(--action);\n}}"
1247    );
1248
1249    // A bar can be saying something, same as a badge: goingson colours subtask
1250    // progress as success and an over-estimate as danger, which is real
1251    // information rather than decoration. Emitting the tones is what lets that
1252    // survive adoption instead of staying hand-written.
1253    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1254        let _ = writeln!(
1255            css,
1256            ".{progress} > .{fill}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    background: var(--{0});\n}}",
1257            tone.token()
1258        );
1259    }
1260    css
1261}
1262
1263/// What a wait looks like, for the attribute that has been describing one to
1264/// nobody.
1265///
1266/// Wiki `loading-and-progress-standard`, phase 2. `data-awaiting` has been
1267/// emitted since the vocabulary gained `Awaiting`, with
1268/// `data-awaiting="determinate"` and a `data-awaiting-amount` beside it or
1269/// `data-awaiting="indeterminate"` alone, and until 0.60.0 **nothing in the tree
1270/// styled either**. Determinate and indeterminate rendered identically, which is
1271/// to say not at all. This is the half that was missing.
1272///
1273/// # Why it is keyed on `aria-busy` and not on the attribute alone
1274///
1275/// `data-awaiting` is a fact about the control: pressing this waits. It is true
1276/// when the page is painted and it stays true. Whether a wait is *running* is
1277/// true only between two events, so it is the binder's to set, and `aria-busy`
1278/// is the standard spelling of it — announced as well as drawn, which a class
1279/// of our own would not be.
1280///
1281/// That also keeps this crate out of any one client library's vocabulary.
1282/// `quasi-webview` sets `aria-busy` from htmx's request events; a host driving
1283/// the same markup another way sets it the same way and gets the same drawing.
1284///
1285/// # The two drawings
1286///
1287/// One pseudo-element either way, so no renderer has to emit an extra node.
1288///
1289/// Indeterminate is the activity mark of rule 2: a small square that blinks.
1290/// Determinate is a trough with a fill, drawn as a single gradient whose stop is
1291/// `--awaiting-share`, a plain number from 0 to 1 that the binder sets from
1292/// bytes it has actually watched land. A determinate control with nothing
1293/// setting the share draws an empty trough rather than a full one, which is the
1294/// honest reading: the size is known and the delivery is not.
1295///
1296/// **What the bar may not do**, from rule 1 and from `Awaiting`'s own docs:
1297/// what is done over what there is, and never a remaining time, an arrival time
1298/// or a rate extrapolated forward. Nothing here can express one, which is
1299/// deliberate — the only input is a share of a measured payload.
1300///
1301/// # Sizes, and the deferral rule
1302///
1303/// `progress_rules` emits the tones and never the width, because the width is
1304/// not this crate's to know. A pseudo-element has no intrinsic size at all, so
1305/// the same treatment would render nothing anywhere. Both sizes are therefore
1306/// custom properties with defaults: an app that wants a different mark sets
1307/// `--awaiting-mark` and `--awaiting-bar` once, and one that says nothing gets a
1308/// mark that is visible.
1309///
1310/// # The cadence, and what happens without it
1311///
1312/// `--cadence-activity` comes from `makeover-timing` through `makeover-build`,
1313/// and is a half-period, so a full cycle is twice it. It is used bare rather
1314/// than with a fallback: a number written here would be a second heartbeat for
1315/// a mark three renderers draw.
1316///
1317/// A sheet assembled without the time axis leaves `animation-duration` invalid,
1318/// which resolves to `0s`, which runs no animation and leaves the base style —
1319/// a lit, still mark. That is also exactly what the reduced-motion block does,
1320/// since it sets the cadence to `0ms`. Both fall out of one rule because the
1321/// base style is lit and the keyframes do the dimming, which is the ordering
1322/// `makeover_timing::reduced_motion_css` asks its consumers for by name.
1323fn awaiting_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1324    let mut css = String::new();
1325
1326    // Dimming rather than lighting, so a zero-length animation leaves a lit
1327    // mark rather than a blank one. See `makeover_timing::reduced_motion_css`.
1328    css.push_str(
1329        "@keyframes makeover-activity {\n    \
1330         0%, 49.99% {\n        background: var(--action);\n    }\n    \
1331         50%, 100% {\n        background: var(--surface-sunken);\n    }\n\
1332         }\n",
1333    );
1334
1335    // Nothing is drawn until something is waiting. `content` on the base rule
1336    // rather than on the busy one keeps the box the same box across the
1337    // transition, so a mark appearing does not reflow the line it is in.
1338    let _ = writeln!(
1339        css,
1340        "[data-awaiting]::after {{\n    \
1341         content: \"\";\n    \
1342         display: none;\n    \
1343         margin-inline-start: var(--awaiting-gap, 0.5ch);\n    \
1344         vertical-align: baseline;\n\
1345         }}"
1346    );
1347
1348    let _ = writeln!(
1349        css,
1350        "[data-awaiting][aria-busy=\"true\"]::after {{\n    \
1351         display: inline-block;\n    \
1352         inline-size: var(--awaiting-mark, 0.5em);\n    \
1353         block-size: var(--awaiting-mark, 0.5em);\n    \
1354         background: var(--action);\n    \
1355         opacity: 1;\n    \
1356         animation: makeover-activity calc(var(--cadence-activity) * 2) \
1357         step-end infinite;\n\
1358         }}"
1359    );
1360
1361    // The measured half. A wider box, no blink, and a gradient whose stop is
1362    // the share: the fill and the trough in one paint, so the markup stays one
1363    // pseudo-element on both branches.
1364    //
1365    // `--awaiting-share` unset is an empty trough, not a full one. A bar that
1366    // read full because nobody was counting would be the confidently-wrong
1367    // drawing rule 1 exists to forbid.
1368    //
1369    // The trough takes an edge for the reason a well does: a bar at zero share
1370    // is otherwise a rectangle of the surface it sits on, which is nothing at
1371    // all. `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` and
1372    // `track_rules` write theirs.
1373    let _ = writeln!(
1374        css,
1375        "[data-awaiting=\"determinate\"][aria-busy=\"true\"]::after {{\n    \
1376         inline-size: var(--awaiting-bar, 6em);\n    \
1377         animation: none;\n    \
1378         outline: {} solid var(--border);\n    \
1379         outline-offset: -{};\n    \
1380         background: linear-gradient(\n        \
1381         to inline-end,\n        \
1382         var(--action) 0 calc(var(--awaiting-share, 0) * 100%),\n        \
1383         var(--surface-sunken) 0\n    \
1384         );\n\
1385         }}",
1386        opts.border_width, opts.border_width
1387    );
1388
1389    css
1390}
1391
1392/// A strip of figures, and the two spans inside each one.
1393///
1394/// Colour only, which is the deferral rule applied to a component that badly
1395/// wants to break it. A figure reads as a figure because the value is set large
1396/// over a small caption, and that is a size: `makeover-geometry` answers how
1397/// much space and this crate answers what the thing is. Emitting `font-size`
1398/// here would be this crate naming a value, which is the one thing it is defined
1399/// by not doing, and `progress_rules` is the precedent — it emits the tones and
1400/// never the width, because the width is not its to know.
1401///
1402/// So the arrangement and the type scale are the app's, and what is generated is
1403/// the part an app cannot get right by itself: which of the two spans carries
1404/// the tone.
1405fn figure_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1406    let figure = class("figure", opts);
1407    let value = class("figure-value", opts);
1408    let caption = class("figure-caption", opts);
1409    let change = class("figure-change", opts);
1410    let mut css = String::new();
1411
1412    let _ = writeln!(
1413        css,
1414        ".{figure} > .{value} {{\n    color: var(--{});\n}}",
1415        Tone::Neutral.token()
1416    );
1417    let _ = writeln!(
1418        css,
1419        ".{figure} > .{caption} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1420    );
1421    let _ = writeln!(
1422        css,
1423        ".{figure} > .{change} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1424    );
1425
1426    // A toned figure tones one part and never the caption. The caption is the
1427    // noun and stays muted.
1428    //
1429    // Which part depends on whether there is a change, and that is the whole of
1430    // what 0.13.0 changed here. A figure with a delta is an ordinary number that
1431    // has moved in a direction worth reading, so the delta takes the colour and
1432    // the number stays plain; a figure without one has nowhere else to put it.
1433    // `:has` is what lets one attribute mean both, and the alternative was the
1434    // emitter deciding by writing the attribute onto a different element, which
1435    // leaves two elements able to disagree about a figure's one meaning.
1436    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1437        let _ = writeln!(
1438            css,
1439            ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{change} {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1440            tone.token()
1441        );
1442        let _ = writeln!(
1443            css,
1444            ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"]:not(:has(> .{change})) > .{value} \
1445             {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1446            tone.token()
1447        );
1448    }
1449    css
1450}
1451
1452/// A picture, its frame and its caption.
1453///
1454/// `makeover_layout::Image` arrived at 0.21.0, found by trying to describe MNW's
1455/// carousel and discovering nothing named a picture.
1456///
1457/// # The frame is a border, and this is the one place a bevel is wrong
1458///
1459/// 0.36.0 emitted [`Depth::Raised`] here through [`depth_rule`], the same call
1460/// `button` and `card` make. It was wrong, and MNW's landing page is where it
1461/// showed: **the frames had no visible edge at all.**
1462///
1463/// `Depth::Raised`'s edge is `--bevel-raised`, which is an *inset* shadow — a
1464/// 1px light run at the top-left and a dark one at the bottom-right, drawn
1465/// **inside** the element's box. On a button or a card that box is a surface
1466/// this crate owns, so an inset edge reads as the surface catching the light.
1467/// On a picture it is drawn on top of the picture, over whatever pixels the
1468/// image happens to have at its border. MNW's screenshots are light-on-light
1469/// parchment, so the light half landed on a light image and the frame
1470/// disappeared.
1471///
1472/// **You cannot bevel a surface you do not own.** A picture's content is the
1473/// app's, arrives at request time, and can be any colour, so its edge has to
1474/// sit *outside* the content rather than on it. That is a border.
1475///
1476/// The fill stays, and it is not decoration: it is what shows through a
1477/// transparent PNG and what stands in the frame's place while the image is
1478/// still loading.
1479///
1480/// This is a real limit on [`Depth`] rather than a special case. Every other
1481/// consumer of a depth draws its own surface; a picture is the first member
1482/// whose surface belongs to someone else.
1483///
1484/// # No size
1485///
1486/// `width: 100%` and nothing else. How large a picture is depends on the box it
1487/// was put in, which is the app's arrangement and `makeover-geometry`'s scales,
1488/// and a renderer that picked one would be answering for every consumer at
1489/// once. This is where `figure_rules` landed for the same reason.
1490fn picture_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1491    let picture = class("picture", opts);
1492    let img = class("picture-img", opts);
1493    let caption = class("picture-caption", opts);
1494    let mut css = String::new();
1495
1496    // Block, or an inline image sits on the text baseline and carries a
1497    // descender's worth of space under it that no app ever wants and every app
1498    // deletes by hand. The border is the frame; see the type docs for why it is
1499    // not the bevel every other surface here gets.
1500    let _ = writeln!(
1501        css,
1502        ".{img} {{\n    display: block;\n    width: 100%;\n    height: auto;\n    \
1503         background: var(--{});\n    border: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1504        Fill::Raised.token(),
1505        opts.border_width
1506    );
1507
1508    // The two fits that need a rule. `Fit::Natural` emits no attribute at all,
1509    // so it is the bare rule above and needs nothing here.
1510    let _ = writeln!(
1511        css,
1512        ".{img}[data-fit=\"cover\"] {{\n    height: 100%;\n    object-fit: cover;\n}}"
1513    );
1514    let _ = writeln!(
1515        css,
1516        ".{img}[data-fit=\"contain\"] {{\n    height: 100%;\n    object-fit: contain;\n}}"
1517    );
1518
1519    // A caption reads back one step, which is `figure-caption`'s answer and the
1520    // same claim: it says what the thing above it is, and it is not the thing.
1521    let _ = writeln!(
1522        css,
1523        ".{picture} > .{caption} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1524    );
1525
1526    css
1527}
1528
1529/// A region showing one child at a time, and the chrome that moves between them.
1530///
1531/// [`makeover_layout::Showing`] lets a description say that a region holds
1532/// several children and shows some of them. A renderer derives its own chrome
1533/// from that, which is what stops every renderer growing a `match` on a widget
1534/// name; these are the rules the derived chrome needs.
1535///
1536/// # Why the default is every child, and the enhancement takes them away
1537///
1538/// The controls are a lie until something binds them. A prev button rendered
1539/// into a document with no script is a control that looks live and answers
1540/// nothing, and the reader it lies to is exactly the one who cannot see the
1541/// other children either — the collapsing and the moving are the same half.
1542///
1543/// So the rules run in the direction the enhancement does. Nothing here hides a
1544/// child and nothing here shows a control. Whatever binds the region sets
1545/// `data-ready` on it, and that is what collapses the stack to one and reveals
1546/// the row that moves it. A reader with no script gets every child in order and
1547/// no controls, which is more content rather than less, and a reader with
1548/// script gets a settled page rather than a stack that jumps to one frame after
1549/// load.
1550///
1551/// MNW proved this shape by hand — a `<noscript>` stylesheet opening its
1552/// carousel back out — and it is here rather than there because the property is
1553/// the description's, not one app's.
1554///
1555/// # Not spacing
1556///
1557/// The row's gaps are `makeover-geometry`'s question and are absent for
1558/// [`row_rules`]'s reason. What is here is `display`, which carries no
1559/// magnitude, and the muted readout, which is the same claim `picture-caption`
1560/// makes: it says where you are among the children and it is not one of them.
1561fn showing_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1562    let controls = class("showing", opts);
1563    let position = class("showing-position", opts);
1564    let frame = class("showing-frame", opts);
1565    let mut css = String::new();
1566
1567    // Hidden until something binds it, which is the whole argument above.
1568    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{controls} {{\n    display: none;\n}}");
1569    // Block, and nothing about how the three sit in it. A button and a span are
1570    // inline already, so they make a row without this crate saying so, and
1571    // saying so is where `align-items` and a gap would follow -- both spacing,
1572    // both `makeover-geometry`'s, and `row_rules` refuses them for the same
1573    // reason.
1574    let _ = writeln!(
1575        css,
1576        "[data-ready] > .{controls} {{\n    display: block;\n}}"
1577    );
1578
1579    // A child is in flow until the region is bound, and then only the current
1580    // one is. `.current` is a modifier for the reason `.chosen` and `.latched`
1581    // are: one name for the state, set by whoever knows it.
1582    let _ = writeln!(
1583        css,
1584        "[data-ready] > .{frame}:not(.current) {{\n    display: none;\n}}"
1585    );
1586
1587    // Reads back one step. `picture-caption`'s rule and its reason.
1588    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{position} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1589
1590    css
1591}
1592
1593/// A time axis: the container, its gridlines and ruler, and the placed things.
1594///
1595/// `makeover-layout` 0.24.0's [`Track`](makeover_layout::Track), and the first
1596/// member here whose whole point is *position*. That makes the magnitude line
1597/// this crate keeps worth restating rather than assuming.
1598///
1599/// # Where the numbers come from
1600///
1601/// Every value that varies per item is a custom property the caller sets
1602/// inline, and every rule here reads one. `--track-at` and `--track-for` are
1603/// percentages of the span, which
1604/// [`Track::fraction`](makeover_layout::Track::fraction) computes once so three
1605/// renderers cannot disagree about it. Nothing here knows a pixel.
1606///
1607/// That is what lets the stylesheet stay static while the items move: an entry
1608/// carries `style="--track-at: 37.5%; --track-for: 4.166%"` and the rule below
1609/// turns it into a box. The alternative was emitting a rule per item, which is
1610/// a stylesheet that grows with the data.
1611///
1612/// **The height of the track is the app's**, not this crate's. 96 quarter-hour
1613/// slots at some slot height is a size, and a size is `makeover-geometry`'s
1614/// question -- the same refusal `figure_rules` and `placeholder_rules` make.
1615/// Percentages need a resolved height above them, so `.track` gets
1616/// `position: relative` and nothing else; the app says how tall a day is.
1617///
1618/// # Overlap
1619///
1620/// Two things at the same time is intrinsic to an axis and has no analogue in a
1621/// list. The description does not declare it -- `Placement::overlaps` derives it
1622/// from the times -- so what arrives here is a lane index and a lane count, and
1623/// the rule divides the width. A renderer that would rather stack them ignores
1624/// both properties and the defaults give it one full-width lane.
1625fn track_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1626    let track = class("track", opts);
1627    let slot = class("track-slot", opts);
1628    let tick = class("track-tick", opts);
1629    let entry = class("track-entry", opts);
1630    let mut css = String::new();
1631
1632    // The positioning context every entry resolves against, and the whole of
1633    // what this crate says about the container. No height: see the doc above.
1634    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{track} {{\n    position: relative;\n}}");
1635
1636    // Gridlines and the ruler are the axis reading itself back, which is
1637    // `picture-caption` and `showing-position`'s claim: about the thing rather
1638    // than one of the things.
1639    //
1640    // `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` writes its
1641    // edge. A gridline is the one place a timeline would most naturally reach
1642    // for a hardcoded 1px, and a hardcoded 1px is this crate naming a size.
1643    let _ = writeln!(
1644        css,
1645        ".{slot} {{\n    border-top: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1646        opts.border_width
1647    );
1648    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{tick} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1649
1650    // The one rule that does real work. Top and height are the placement;
1651    // left and width are the lane. Both lane properties default so an entry
1652    // that names neither is full width, which is the common case and the one a
1653    // renderer gets for free.
1654    let _ = writeln!(
1655        css,
1656        ".{entry} {{\n    \
1657         position: absolute;\n    \
1658         top: var(--track-at, 0%);\n    \
1659         height: var(--track-for, 100%);\n    \
1660         left: calc(var(--track-lane, 0) / var(--track-lanes, 1) * 100%);\n    \
1661         width: calc(100% / var(--track-lanes, 1));\n\
1662         }}"
1663    );
1664
1665    css
1666}
1667
1668/// A region's stand-in, and the header of a table that can be reordered.
1669///
1670/// Both are 0.12.0 members and both are colour and affordance only, which is
1671/// where `figure_rules` landed after trying to emit a type scale. How much room
1672/// a stand-in gets is a size — goingson has the same one at three, as
1673/// `--compact`, `--dashboard` and `--padded` — and a size is
1674/// `makeover-geometry`'s question.
1675///
1676/// The caret is the one thing here that is neither colour nor affordance, and it
1677/// is a renderer's own expression rather than a value the description named:
1678/// `aria-sort` is what the table actually says, and this turns it into something
1679/// visible for everyone not using a screen reader. A terminal draws its own; an
1680/// immediate-mode painter draws its own.
1681fn state_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1682    let placeholder = class("placeholder", opts);
1683    let text = class("placeholder-text", opts);
1684    let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1685    let mut css = String::new();
1686
1687    let _ = writeln!(
1688        css,
1689        ".{placeholder} > .{text} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1690    );
1691    // Only the failure is toned. An empty list is the normal state of a new
1692    // install, and `Readiness::tone` is what says so.
1693    let _ = writeln!(
1694        css,
1695        ".{placeholder}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{text} {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1696        Tone::Danger.token()
1697    );
1698
1699    // A header that reorders the table is a control, and the pointer is the
1700    // only part of saying so that is not the app's own type and spacing.
1701    let _ = writeln!(
1702        css,
1703        ".{heading}[data-sortable] {{\n    cursor: pointer;\n}}"
1704    );
1705    // The caret carries its own leading space, the way `makeover-tui` and
1706    // `makeover-immediate` both write `" \u{25B2}"`. It used to be emitted bare,
1707    // and both apps that adopted the vocabulary had to put the gap back in their
1708    // own stylesheets on the same afternoon -- each having to work out first that
1709    // app CSS outranks this crate's cascade layer, so adding the space the
1710    // obvious way, as `content`, silently wins over the glyph and leaves the
1711    // heading with no caret at all. A consumer should not have to know that, and
1712    // with the space emitted here there is nothing left for one to add.
1713    //
1714    // Three states, three tones, on the convention in wiki
1715    // `three-tone-convention`. A column in force is `content`; a column offering
1716    // to reorder and not doing it now is `content-secondary`, because it still
1717    // answers a press; a column that is not sortable emits no caret at all and
1718    // takes nothing. The idle arm used to hide its glyph and reserve the box,
1719    // which cost a reflow-free press and said nothing. It draws now, and the
1720    // reservation stops being a thing to get right.
1721    //
1722    // The glyph is `Sort::glyph`, escaped rather than written: a CSS `content`
1723    // string cannot carry the character literally through this file's own
1724    // escaping, and spelling it here as well would put the third copy back that
1725    // `makeover-layout` 0.27.5 exists to remove.
1726    let _ = writeln!(
1727        css,
1728        ".{heading}[data-sortable]::after \
1729         {{\n    content: \" {}\";\n    color: var(--content-secondary);\n}}",
1730        css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())
1731    );
1732    for direction in [Sort::Ascending, Sort::Descending] {
1733        let _ = writeln!(
1734            css,
1735            ".{heading}[aria-sort=\"{}\"]::after \
1736             {{\n    content: \" {}\";\n    color: var(--content);\n}}",
1737            direction.as_str(),
1738            css_escape(direction.glyph())
1739        );
1740    }
1741    css
1742}
1743
1744/// The frame a table sits in.
1745///
1746/// # Why this is a CSS table and not the grid the rest of the module assumes
1747///
1748/// A grid row needs `grid-template-columns`, which has to name every column in
1749/// order, so it cannot be written without knowing the columns. That is what
1750/// [`list::narrowing_css`] is for, and it works: goingson builds `tables.css` in
1751/// its own `build.rs` out of it, and nothing here changes that.
1752///
1753/// It does not work for a table a *description* produced. Those columns are
1754/// known at render time rather than at build time, and the rules would have to
1755/// travel with the markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs
1756/// `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` and so blocks the MNW server's standing plan to
1757/// drop it. The head is not an escape: a table swapped in by htmx after a
1758/// delete arrives as a fragment with no head at all.
1759///
1760/// A CSS table aligns its columns across rows knowing nothing about how many
1761/// there are, so there is no track list to emit and nothing per-table to carry.
1762/// The cost is that a described table cannot take a per-column fixed length,
1763/// which costs nothing today: [`Sizing`](list::Sizing) is looked up by column
1764/// name and a description carries no lengths to put in it, so every track a
1765/// described table could ask for is already content, fill or auto.
1766///
1767/// [`Priority`] hiding is unchanged in kind. It moves from a generated
1768/// `display: none` per dropped column to one rule per drop class, which is the
1769/// same fact addressed by class rather than by cutoff, and still never by
1770/// position.
1771fn table_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1772    let table = class("table", opts);
1773    let head = class("table-head", opts);
1774    let row = class("table-row", opts);
1775    let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1776    let cell = class("cell", opts);
1777    let mut css = String::new();
1778
1779    let _ = writeln!(
1780        css,
1781        ".{table} {{\n    display: table;\n    width: 100%;\n}}"
1782    );
1783    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{head},\n.{row} {{\n    display: table-row;\n}}");
1784    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{heading},\n.{cell} {{\n    display: table-cell;\n}}");
1785
1786    // A content column shrinks to what is in it. `width: 1%` is how a CSS table
1787    // is told that: auto layout hands the slack to the columns that asked for
1788    // room, and a column asking for almost none gets what it needs and no more.
1789    // The `nowrap` is what stops it being given less by wrapping.
1790    let _ = writeln!(
1791        css,
1792        ".{} {{\n    white-space: nowrap;\n    width: 1%;\n}}",
1793        class("cell-content", opts)
1794    );
1795
1796    // A fixed column has no length to be fixed to. The description carries none
1797    // and `Sizing` is not reachable from here, so it behaves as content: the
1798    // honest answer to a width nobody supplied, and the same one `Sizing::track`
1799    // gives it.
1800    let _ = writeln!(
1801        css,
1802        ".{} {{\n    white-space: nowrap;\n}}",
1803        class("cell-fixed", opts)
1804    );
1805
1806    // Optional columns go at the narrowest class, secondary ones go with them,
1807    // which is the cutoff walk `kept_at` describes said as two media queries.
1808    // Essential columns have no rule at all, because never dropping is what not
1809    // being mentioned already means.
1810    for (size, drops) in [
1811        (
1812            SizeClass::Compact,
1813            &["cell-drops-first", "cell-drops-next"][..],
1814        ),
1815        (SizeClass::Medium, &["cell-drops-first"][..]),
1816    ] {
1817        let selectors: Vec<String> = drops
1818            .iter()
1819            .map(|drop| format!(".{}", class(drop, opts)))
1820            .collect();
1821        css.push_str(&gated(
1822            Some(&size.media_condition()),
1823            &format!("{} {{\n    display: none;\n}}\n", selectors.join(",\n")),
1824        ));
1825    }
1826
1827    // What is inside a cell, which the table side could not say until
1828    // makeover-layout 0.14.0. Every cell was one `.cell` and one content
1829    // colour, so a button in a cell was painted as text -- the drift
1830    // `RowPart::intent` has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented
1831    // for nothing here.
1832    //
1833    // The colour goes on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell`, and that
1834    // placement is the whole fix. On the container it would cascade into the
1835    // tokens and the controls sitting beside the text, which is the bug said
1836    // in one rule; on the part that is text, it reaches text and stops.
1837    for part in [
1838        CellPart::Value,
1839        CellPart::Tokens,
1840        CellPart::Actions,
1841        CellPart::Link,
1842    ] {
1843        // Three of the four inherit, each for its own reason: a token carries
1844        // its own tone, an action is a control rather than text, and a link
1845        // takes the action colour from the anchor it is. `CellPart::intent`
1846        // says so by answering with the intent inheriting already gives, and
1847        // pinning that would be louder than saying nothing.
1848        //
1849        // Written as a skip-list rather than as a match on Value, so a member
1850        // added upstream gets its intent emitted rather than being silently
1851        // dropped. That is the same trade `part_class`'s fallback makes: land
1852        // plainly, never land as nothing.
1853        if !matches!(part, CellPart::Tokens | CellPart::Actions | CellPart::Link) {
1854            let _ = writeln!(
1855                css,
1856                ".{} {{\n    color: var(--{});\n}}",
1857                class(cell_part_class(part), opts),
1858                part.intent()
1859            );
1860        }
1861    }
1862
1863    css
1864}
1865
1866/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
1867///
1868/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
1869/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
1870/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
1871#[must_use]
1872pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1873    let mut css = String::new();
1874    css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
1875    css.push_str(&link_rules(opts));
1876    css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
1877    css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
1878    css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
1879    css.push_str(&run_rules(opts));
1880    css.push_str(&progress_rules(opts));
1881    css.push_str(&awaiting_rules(opts));
1882    css.push_str(&figure_rules(opts));
1883    css.push_str(&picture_rules(opts));
1884    css.push_str(&showing_rules(opts));
1885    css.push_str(&track_rules(opts));
1886    css.push_str(&state_rules(opts));
1887    css.push_str(&table_rules(opts));
1888    css.push_str(&facet::facet_rules(opts));
1889    css.push_str(&form::editor_rules(opts));
1890    css.push_str(&form::suggestion_rules(opts));
1891    css.push_str(&form::unit_rules(opts));
1892    css
1893}
1894
1895/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, in
1896/// [`CSS_LAYER`], under a generated-file banner.
1897///
1898/// The banner sits outside the layer, because a comment participates in no
1899/// cascade and a reader opening the file should see what it is before seeing
1900/// an at-rule.
1901#[must_use]
1902pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1903    let body = in_css_layer(&format!(
1904        ":root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
1905        bevel_properties(opts),
1906        depth_rules(opts),
1907        component_rules(opts)
1908    ));
1909    // Counted from the body rather than through `vocabulary::names`, which
1910    // calls back into here.
1911    let classes = vocabulary::classes_in_css(&body).len();
1912    let version = VERSION;
1913    format!(
1914        "/* Generated by makeover-webview {version} from makeover-layout, \
1915         {classes} classes.\n   \
1916         Do not edit. The version and the count are here because a stale\n   \
1917         lockfile fails silently: an older emitter writes a well-formed sheet\n   \
1918         with components missing, and nothing else in the file says so. If\n   \
1919         this version trails what the manifest asks for, re-resolve.\n\n   \
1920         Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n   \
1921         them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout.\n\n   \
1922         Everything below is in the `{CSS_LAYER}` cascade layer. Declare the\n   \
1923         order once in your own stylesheet, or this layer's position is decided\n   \
1924         by whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:\n\n   \
1925         @layer {CSS_LAYER}, base, components, responsive; */\n{body}"
1926    )
1927}
1928
1929#[cfg(test)]
1930mod tests {
1931    use super::*;
1932    use makeover_layout::Edge;
1933
1934    #[test]
1935    fn every_fallback_class_is_one_a_checker_knows_about() {
1936        // The obligation ROW_PART_CLASSES carries, for the same reason: a class
1937        // this crate can write and the vocabulary list does not carry is
1938        // invisible to the dead-vocabulary seal and to the overlap check both.
1939        for fallback in [
1940            Fallback::Wrap,
1941            Fallback::Stack,
1942            Fallback::Shed,
1943            Fallback::Menu,
1944        ] {
1945            assert!(
1946                RUN_CLASSES.contains(&fallback_class(fallback)),
1947                "{fallback:?} is missing from RUN_CLASSES"
1948            );
1949        }
1950        let names = crate::vocabulary::names(&Emit::default());
1951        for name in RUN_CLASSES {
1952            assert!(names.contains(*name), "{name} is not in the vocabulary");
1953        }
1954    }
1955
1956    #[test]
1957    fn a_run_gives_every_member_a_floor_it_cannot_be_squeezed_below() {
1958        // The whole of what stops the overlap, and it is not a fallback: it
1959        // applies to every run whatever the group declared. flexbox's default
1960        // min-width is auto, which lets an item be compressed below its own
1961        // content in a nowrap row, and that is how a toolbar is drawn over a
1962        // tab strip even with nothing out of flow.
1963        let css = run_rules(&Emit::default());
1964        assert!(css.contains(".run > * {\n    min-width: min-content;\n}"));
1965        // No number anywhere in it. The minimum is derived by the browser from
1966        // what the members contain, which is the ruling's own requirement.
1967        assert!(!css.contains("px"));
1968        assert!(!css.contains("rem"));
1969        assert!(!css.contains("@media"));
1970    }
1971
1972    #[test]
1973    fn room_is_never_asked_of_the_viewport() {
1974        // The 913 case: a window in SizeClass::Expanded holding a group out of
1975        // room. A viewport query answers about the window and would be wrong
1976        // about the group, which is why the table's @media walk is not the
1977        // precedent this follows.
1978        let css = run_rules(&Emit::default());
1979        for size in [SizeClass::Compact, SizeClass::Medium] {
1980            assert!(!css.contains(&size.media_condition()));
1981        }
1982    }
1983
1984    #[test]
1985    fn every_fallback_lands_as_a_class_and_an_unknown_one_lands_plainly() {
1986        let css = run_rules(&Emit::default());
1987        for fallback in [
1988            Fallback::Wrap,
1989            Fallback::Stack,
1990            Fallback::Shed,
1991            Fallback::Menu,
1992        ] {
1993            let class = fallback_class(fallback);
1994            assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{class} {{")), "{class} unemitted");
1995        }
1996        // Stack is the one that also says what a member does with the line it
1997        // took, which is what separates it from wrapping.
1998        assert!(css.contains(".run-stack > * {\n    flex: 1 1 max-content;\n}"));
1999    }
2000
2001    #[test]
2002    fn the_emitted_bevel_matches_what_the_apps_already_hand_write() {
2003        // Balanced Breakfast's styles.css, verbatim. Adoption has to be a
2004        // deletion, not a redesign, or nobody will take it.
2005        let opts = Emit::default();
2006        assert_eq!(
2007            bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts),
2008            "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-light), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-dark)"
2009        );
2010        assert_eq!(
2011            bevel_shadow(Bevel::Inset, &opts),
2012            "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-dark), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-light)"
2013        );
2014    }
2015
2016    #[test]
2017    fn no_colour_ever_reaches_the_output() {
2018        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2019        assert!(!css.contains('#'), "a hex literal escaped into the CSS");
2020        assert!(
2021            !css.contains("rgb"),
2022            "a colour function escaped into the CSS"
2023        );
2024        // Every colour is named, never resolved.
2025        assert!(css.contains("var(--surface-raised)"));
2026        assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-light)"));
2027    }
2028
2029    #[test]
2030    fn a_well_falls_back_through_css_rather_than_through_rust() {
2031        assert_eq!(
2032            fill_var(Fill::Well),
2033            "var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"
2034        );
2035        // Nothing else needs one.
2036        assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Raised), "var(--surface-raised)");
2037        assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Page), "var(--surface-page)");
2038    }
2039
2040    #[test]
2041    fn raised_and_well_do_not_collapse_onto_each_other() {
2042        let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
2043        assert!(css.contains(".raised {"));
2044        assert!(css.contains(".well {"));
2045        assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"));
2046        assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"));
2047    }
2048
2049    /// The cast shadow is composed here from the tone `makeover` derives, so
2050    /// neither crate has to hold the other's numbers.
2051    ///
2052    /// It is a `:root` property and deliberately not a depth class. There is no
2053    /// `Depth::Overlay` in the description layer, and adding one would be a
2054    /// claim about what a screen means rather than about how it is painted;
2055    /// until something asks for it, a consumer names the property on the rule
2056    /// for the menu or the toast it already has.
2057    #[test]
2058    fn the_cast_shadow_is_a_root_property_not_a_depth() {
2059        let css = bevel_properties(&Emit::default());
2060        assert!(css.contains("--elevation-overlay:"));
2061        assert!(css.contains("var(--elevation)"));
2062        assert!(
2063            !depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("elevation"),
2064            "elevation is not a depth class"
2065        );
2066    }
2067
2068    #[test]
2069    fn the_cascade_carries_the_pressed_state() {
2070        let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2071        // The one thing this renderer gets free that the other two resolve by
2072        // hand, eighteen call sites deep in audiofiles' case. Asserted on a
2073        // named surface: pressing belongs to the control, not to the depth.
2074        assert!(css.contains(".card:active {"));
2075        assert!(css.contains(".button:active {"));
2076    }
2077
2078    #[test]
2079    fn the_depth_class_is_a_surface_and_not_a_control() {
2080        let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
2081        // The static surface the vocabulary was missing. Sixteen goingson
2082        // elements wore .card and cancelled its hover and press to get this,
2083        // because a raised object that is not pressable had no other spelling.
2084        for state in [":hover", ":active", ":focus-visible", ":disabled"] {
2085            assert!(
2086                !css.contains(&format!(".raised{state}")),
2087                "the depth class claimed {state}: {css}"
2088            );
2089        }
2090        assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"), "still raised: {css}");
2091    }
2092
2093    #[test]
2094    fn pressing_moves_the_fill_and_not_only_the_edge() {
2095        // The decision-1 guard, and the regression that mattered: emitting the
2096        // bevel flip alone is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
2097        // var(--surface-sunken)` on .btn, .card and .tag/.badge alike, so none
2098        // of the three could be deleted.
2099        let pressed = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
2100        assert!(pressed.contains(".button:active {"));
2101        assert!(
2102            pressed.contains("background: var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"),
2103            "pressed dropped its fill: {pressed}"
2104        );
2105        assert!(pressed.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
2106    }
2107
2108    #[test]
2109    fn pressed_takes_its_fill_from_the_description_not_from_the_app() {
2110        // goingson presses to --surface-sunken. The description says a pressed
2111        // raised region reads as a well, and makeover says outright that
2112        // surface-sunken cannot serve as one, so the app is the thing that
2113        // moves.
2114        //
2115        // Scoped to the pressed rules rather than to the whole sheet: since
2116        // makeover-layout 0.3.0 an unchosen tab is legitimately
2117        // --surface-sunken, so the token appearing somewhere in the output no
2118        // longer means the app's choice leaked in.
2119        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2120        let mut checked = 0;
2121        for rule in css.split("}\n") {
2122            if !rule.contains(":active") {
2123                continue;
2124            }
2125            checked += 1;
2126            assert!(
2127                !rule.contains("surface-sunken"),
2128                "a pressed rule took the app's fill: {rule}"
2129            );
2130        }
2131        assert!(checked > 0, "no pressed rules found to check");
2132        assert_eq!(
2133            Depth::Raised.pressed().fill(),
2134            Some(Fill::Well),
2135            "the description changed under us"
2136        );
2137    }
2138
2139    #[test]
2140    fn the_whole_stylesheet_is_emitted_in_the_family_layer() {
2141        // The point of 0.11.0. Unlayered normal declarations outrank every
2142        // named layer, so an app declaring `@layer base, components` loses
2143        // every rule it owns to this file until this file is layered too.
2144        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2145        assert!(css.contains(&format!("@layer {CSS_LAYER} {{")));
2146
2147        // Exactly one layer block, and nothing outside it but the banner.
2148        assert_eq!(css.matches("@layer").count(), 2, "banner names it once");
2149        let opened = css.find("@layer makeover {").expect("layer opens");
2150        for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
2151            let before_layer = css.lines().take(i).map(str::len).sum::<usize>() < opened;
2152            if before_layer || line.is_empty() {
2153                continue;
2154            }
2155            assert!(
2156                line.starts_with("    ") || line == "}" || line.starts_with("   "),
2157                "line outside the layer: {line:?}"
2158            );
2159        }
2160    }
2161
2162    #[test]
2163    fn the_generated_sheet_carries_no_trailing_whitespace() {
2164        // A checked-in generated file that a formatter wants to rewrite is a
2165        // diff every time somebody saves it.
2166        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2167        for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
2168            assert_eq!(line, line.trim_end(), "trailing whitespace on line {i}");
2169        }
2170    }
2171
2172    #[test]
2173    fn the_banner_tells_an_app_how_to_order_the_layer() {
2174        // Without a declared order the layer's position depends on which
2175        // generated file the browser sees first, which is not a contract.
2176        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2177        assert!(css.contains("@layer makeover, base, components, responsive;"));
2178        // And the banner is outside the layer, not a rule inside it.
2179        assert!(css.starts_with("/* Generated by makeover-webview"));
2180    }
2181
2182    #[test]
2183    fn the_banner_names_the_emitter_so_a_stale_pin_is_visible_on_sight() {
2184        // A consumer whose lockfile pins an old version gets a well-formed
2185        // sheet with components missing and no error. balanced_breakfast ran
2186        // on 657 bytes from a 0.1.0 emitter while its manifest asked for
2187        // 0.5.1, and the only way it surfaced was diffing two apps' generated
2188        // files. The version and the count are what the file says instead.
2189        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2190        let banner = css.lines().next().unwrap();
2191        assert!(
2192            banner.contains(VERSION),
2193            "{banner} does not name the emitter"
2194        );
2195        let classes = vocabulary::classes_in_css(&css).len();
2196        assert!(classes > 0);
2197        assert!(
2198            banner.contains(&format!("{classes} classes")),
2199            "{banner} does not carry the class count"
2200        );
2201    }
2202
2203    #[test]
2204    fn a_primitive_owns_every_state_it_implies() {
2205        // The whole point of 0.10.0. Anything emitting a hover rule owes the
2206        // other three, or the consuming app supplies them by out-specifying a
2207        // rule it does not own: 19 such rules in goingson, 21 in the MNW
2208        // server, and three focus rings that do not match.
2209        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2210        for selector in ["button", "card", "chip", "tab", "segment", "toggle"] {
2211            assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:hover {{")), "{selector}");
2212            assert!(
2213                css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:active {{")),
2214                "{selector}"
2215            );
2216            assert!(
2217                css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:focus-visible {{")),
2218                "{selector} has no focus ring"
2219            );
2220            assert!(
2221                css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:disabled,")),
2222                "{selector} has no disabled state"
2223            );
2224        }
2225    }
2226
2227    #[test]
2228    fn a_field_takes_focus_and_refuses_input_without_taking_a_hover() {
2229        // A text field does not light up under the pointer, so it gets the two
2230        // states it has and not the two it does not.
2231        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2232        assert!(css.contains(".field:focus-visible {"));
2233        assert!(css.contains(".field:disabled,"));
2234        assert!(!css.contains(".field:hover {"));
2235        assert!(!css.contains(".field:active {"));
2236    }
2237
2238    #[test]
2239    fn disabled_is_emitted_after_hover_so_source_order_settles_it() {
2240        // Every one of these selectors is specificity (0,2,0), so nothing but
2241        // order decides which wins. A disabled button taking the hover fill is
2242        // the exact bug goingson's `.button:disabled:hover` was written to fix,
2243        // and the reason it had to reach (0,3,0) to do it.
2244        let css = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
2245        let hover = css.find(":hover").expect("hover");
2246        let active = css.find(":active").expect("active");
2247        let focus = css.find(":focus-visible").expect("focus");
2248        let disabled = css.find(":disabled").expect("disabled");
2249        assert!(hover < active && active < focus && focus < disabled);
2250
2251        // And it restores the surface, or the hover fill survives underneath.
2252        let tail = &css[disabled..];
2253        assert!(tail.contains("background: var(--surface-raised)"));
2254    }
2255
2256    #[test]
2257    fn a_disabled_state_reaches_things_that_cannot_be_disabled() {
2258        // `:disabled` matches form elements only, and a chip is a div. Keying
2259        // on the ARIA attribute too is the pattern the invalid field already
2260        // set: one fact, read by the styling and the accessibility tree alike.
2261        let css = disabled_rule("chip", Depth::Raised);
2262        assert!(css.contains(".chip:disabled,"));
2263        assert!(css.contains(".chip[aria-disabled=\"true\"]"));
2264        assert!(css.contains("cursor: not-allowed"));
2265    }
2266
2267    #[test]
2268    fn the_focus_ring_does_not_disturb_the_bevel_it_lands_on() {
2269        // `outline` has its own property, so unlike the invalid ring there is
2270        // no bevel to restate beside it and nothing to keep in agreement.
2271        let opts = Emit::default();
2272        let css = focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts);
2273        assert!(css.contains("outline: 2px solid var(--focus-ring)"));
2274        assert!(!css.contains("box-shadow"), "the ring restated the bevel");
2275    }
2276
2277    #[test]
2278    fn a_well_takes_the_ring_inside_and_a_raised_surface_outside() {
2279        // One ring, placed by depth. The offset comes off `Depth::bevel` and
2280        // not off a per-component choice, which is what gave three apps three
2281        // different rings.
2282        let opts = Emit::default();
2283        assert!(focus_rule("field", Depth::Well, &opts).contains("outline-offset: calc(-1 * 2px)"));
2284        assert!(focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
2285        // Nothing to sit inside of, so it sits outside.
2286        assert!(focus_rule("badge", Depth::Sunken, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
2287
2288        // And the ring is not the bevel. Reusing border_width emitted a 1px
2289        // ring that every consumer had already overridden.
2290        assert_ne!(opts.focus_width, opts.border_width);
2291    }
2292
2293    #[test]
2294    fn hover_is_gated_on_capability_and_the_keyboard_path_is_not() {
2295        // goingson's section 60 exists only to take back the hover state this
2296        // crate handed it. Gating at the source is what deletes that section
2297        // in all three apps rather than having each fight for it.
2298        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2299        let condition = format!("@media {}", Density::Pointer.media_condition());
2300        assert!(css.contains(&condition));
2301
2302        // What is gated is every hover state the surfaces carry. The row's
2303        // actions used to be the other half of this test and are not gated any
2304        // more, because they are not hidden any more: a rule that reveals
2305        // nothing needs no capability answer.
2306        let gated: Vec<&str> = css.lines().filter(|line| line.contains(":hover")).collect();
2307        assert!(!gated.is_empty(), "{css}");
2308        for line in gated {
2309            let indent = line.len() - line.trim_start().len();
2310            assert!(indent > 4, "an ungated hover rule: {line}");
2311        }
2312        assert!(!css.contains(".row:hover"), "{css}");
2313    }
2314
2315    #[test]
2316    fn the_capability_answer_is_asked_for_and_not_assumed() {
2317        // Both halves come from the crates that own them. If `makeover-touch`
2318        // ever says a fingertip has hover, this stops gating on its own.
2319        assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact));
2320        assert!(Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Pointer, SizeClass::Compact));
2321        assert_eq!(hover_condition(), Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition()));
2322
2323        // And the size class passed to that call is not a claim about width.
2324        assert!(Affordance::Hover.reads_density());
2325        for size in [SizeClass::Compact, SizeClass::Medium, SizeClass::Expanded] {
2326            assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, size));
2327        }
2328    }
2329
2330    #[test]
2331    fn hover_resolves_against_the_token_makeover_already_derives() {
2332        let css = interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
2333        assert!(css.contains(".card:hover {"));
2334        assert!(css.contains("background: var(--hover-surface)"));
2335        // Not the app's choice, which was --surface-overlay.
2336        assert!(!css.contains("surface-overlay"));
2337    }
2338
2339    #[test]
2340    fn a_badge_gets_no_edge_and_no_fill() {
2341        // Decision 2, and the one visible redesign in phase A. Token::Badge is
2342        // Flat: an edge on a label says it can be pressed.
2343        let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
2344        let badge = css
2345            .lines()
2346            .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".badge {"))
2347            .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2348            .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2349            .join("\n");
2350        assert!(!badge.contains("box-shadow"), "badge kept an edge: {badge}");
2351        assert!(!badge.contains("background"), "badge kept a fill: {badge}");
2352        assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(false), Depth::Flat);
2353        assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(true), Depth::Flat);
2354    }
2355
2356    #[test]
2357    fn a_badge_carries_a_tone_and_neutral_is_the_bare_class() {
2358        let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
2359        // Neutral is the absence of a status, not a status named "none".
2360        assert!(css.contains(".badge {\n    color: var(--content-muted);"));
2361        assert!(!css.contains("data-tone=\"content-muted\""));
2362        for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
2363            assert!(
2364                css.contains(&format!(".badge[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
2365                "missing tone {tone}"
2366            );
2367            assert!(css.contains(&format!("color: var(--{tone})")));
2368        }
2369    }
2370
2371    #[test]
2372    fn a_chip_is_raised_and_latches_into_a_well() {
2373        let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
2374        assert!(css.contains(".chip {"));
2375        assert!(css.contains(".chip.latched {"));
2376        assert!(css.contains(".chip:active {"));
2377        // The whole difference from a badge: it answers a click.
2378        assert!(Token::Chip { removable: false }.interactive());
2379        assert!(!Token::Badge.interactive());
2380    }
2381
2382    #[test]
2383    fn only_a_tab_comes_forward_when_chosen() {
2384        // The folder semantic. Collapsing the three selectors would lose it.
2385        let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
2386        assert!(css.contains(".tab.chosen {"));
2387        assert!(css.contains(".segment.chosen {"));
2388        assert!(css.contains(".toggle.chosen {"));
2389        assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.chosen(), Depth::Raised);
2390        assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2391        assert_eq!(Selector::Toggle.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2392
2393        let tab = css
2394            .lines()
2395            .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".tab.chosen {"))
2396            .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2397            .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2398            .join("\n");
2399        assert!(
2400            tab.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"),
2401            "tab was held in: {tab}"
2402        );
2403    }
2404
2405    #[test]
2406    fn an_unchosen_tab_recedes_without_looking_picked() {
2407        let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
2408        // Recessed by colour and given no edge. An edge would make every option
2409        // look picked; flat would leave the chosen one nothing to come forward
2410        // from, which is the gap makeover-layout 0.3.0 closed.
2411        assert!(
2412            css.contains(".tab {\n    background: var(--surface-sunken);\n}"),
2413            "unchosen tab is not recessed: {css}"
2414        );
2415        assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.unchosen(), Depth::Sunken);
2416        assert!(css.contains(".tab:hover {"));
2417    }
2418
2419    #[test]
2420    fn a_segment_stands_up_so_the_chosen_one_can_be_held_in() {
2421        // The inverse of the tab, and why the three selectors are not one
2422        // member with a flag.
2423        let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
2424        assert!(css.contains(".segment {\n    background: var(--surface-raised);"));
2425        assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.unchosen(), Depth::Raised);
2426        assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2427    }
2428
2429    #[test]
2430    fn a_rows_actions_are_shown_at_rest() {
2431        let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2432
2433        // The hover reveal is gone, and with it every escape it needed. What
2434        // it hid was hidden from pointer users alone, who are the ones
2435        // scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
2436        assert!(!css.contains("opacity"), "{css}");
2437        assert!(!css.contains("pointer-events"), "{css}");
2438        assert!(!css.contains(":hover"), "{css}");
2439        assert!(!css.contains(":focus-within"), "{css}");
2440
2441        // Nor is it hidden any other way. `display: none` would reflow the row
2442        // and `visibility: hidden` would take the actions out of the focus
2443        // order; the point is that neither is reached for.
2444        assert!(!css.contains("display: none"), "{css}");
2445        assert!(!css.contains("visibility:"), "{css}");
2446    }
2447
2448    #[test]
2449    fn a_figures_tone_lands_on_the_delta_when_there_is_one() {
2450        // 0.13.0. The delta is the part that reads as good or bad; the number
2451        // itself is an ordinary fact. A figure with no delta has nowhere else to
2452        // put the colour, so the value takes it, and `:has` is what lets one
2453        // attribute mean both without the emitter choosing an element.
2454        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2455
2456        assert!(
2457            css.contains(".figure[data-tone=\"success\"] > .figure-change"),
2458            "{css}"
2459        );
2460        assert!(
2461            css.contains(
2462                ".figure[data-tone=\"success\"]:not(:has(> .figure-change)) > .figure-value"
2463            ),
2464            "{css}"
2465        );
2466        // The caption is the noun and never takes the tone.
2467        assert!(
2468            !css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] > .figure-caption"),
2469            "{css}"
2470        );
2471    }
2472
2473    #[test]
2474    fn the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits() {
2475        let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2476        assert!(css.contains(".row-primary {\n    color: var(--content);"));
2477        assert!(css.contains(".row-secondary {\n    color: var(--content-secondary);"));
2478        assert!(css.contains(".row-meta {\n    color: var(--content-muted);"));
2479        // Actions carry controls, not text. Pinning the colour it would inherit
2480        // anyway is louder than saying nothing.
2481        assert!(!css.contains(".row-actions {\n    color:"));
2482    }
2483
2484    #[test]
2485    fn the_token_strip_takes_no_colour_of_its_own() {
2486        // makeover-layout 0.9.0. A token carries its own tone, so a colour on
2487        // the strip would be a rule fighting the things sitting in it -- the
2488        // same reasoning as actions, reached for a different reason.
2489        let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2490        assert!(!css.contains(".row-tokens {\n    color:"));
2491    }
2492
2493    #[test]
2494    fn an_unknown_row_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
2495        // What `#[non_exhaustive]` bought and what it cost. `part_class` can no
2496        // longer be exhaustive, so a member added upstream lands as a bare
2497        // class with no rule instead of stopping the build. Asserting the
2498        // fallback exists is what keeps it from being written as `unreachable!`
2499        // by someone who reads the match as closed.
2500        assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Tokens), "row-tokens");
2501        assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Meta), "row-meta");
2502    }
2503
2504    #[test]
2505    fn a_link_takes_the_action_colour_the_theme_actually_defines() {
2506        // `--action-primary` shipped here for months and no theme has ever
2507        // defined it, so every `.link` dropped its colour declaration outright
2508        // and fell back to inherited text. Nothing caught it because the sheet
2509        // is valid CSS either way; MNW's no-undefined-token lint is what found
2510        // it, 2026-08-14. The hover arm two lines below was always `--action-hover`,
2511        // which is what makes the typo legible in hindsight.
2512        let css = link_rules(&Emit::default());
2513        assert!(css.contains("color: var(--action);"));
2514        assert!(!css.contains("--action-primary"));
2515        assert!(css.contains("color: var(--action-hover);"));
2516    }
2517
2518    #[test]
2519    fn the_progress_trough_is_a_well() {
2520        let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
2521        assert!(css.contains(".progress {"));
2522        assert!(css.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
2523        assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {"));
2524        assert!(css.contains("background: var(--action)"));
2525        // A bare `.fill` would catch things that have nothing to do with
2526        // progress once the sheet lands unprefixed.
2527        assert!(!css.contains("> .fill "));
2528    }
2529
2530    #[test]
2531    fn a_progress_bar_can_carry_a_tone_and_defaults_to_action() {
2532        let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
2533        // Untoned is --action, not Tone::Neutral's content-muted: a bar with no
2534        // status is still reporting progress, and muted would read as disabled.
2535        assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {\n    background: var(--action);"));
2536        assert!(!css.contains("progress-fill {\n    color: var(--content-muted)"));
2537        for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
2538            assert!(
2539                css.contains(&format!(".progress > .progress-fill[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
2540                "missing progress tone {tone}"
2541            );
2542        }
2543        // goingson's two live cases, which is why the tones are emitted at all.
2544        assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] {\n    background: var(--success);"));
2545        assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n    background: var(--danger);"));
2546    }
2547
2548    #[test]
2549    fn no_scrollbar_track_is_emitted() {
2550        // Decision 3's negative half. It was on the phase A list and came off;
2551        // this is what stops it drifting back in.
2552        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2553        assert!(!css.contains("scrollbar"));
2554        assert!(!css.contains("::-webkit"));
2555    }
2556
2557    #[test]
2558    fn an_invalid_field_is_ringed_without_being_lit() {
2559        let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2560        assert!(css.contains(".field {"));
2561        // The ARIA attribute, not a class: one fact, read by both the visual
2562        // and the accessible state, so they cannot drift.
2563        assert!(css.contains(".field[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {"));
2564        assert!(!css.contains(".field.invalid"));
2565        // A flat ring: this edge says "wrong", and a two-tone bevel would have
2566        // it say "raised" at the same time.
2567        assert!(css.contains("0 0 0 1px var(--danger)"));
2568    }
2569
2570    #[test]
2571    fn an_invalid_field_keeps_the_well_underneath_it() {
2572        // box-shadow is not additive. A lone ring replaces the bevel and drops
2573        // the well out from under the field, which is what this emitted before
2574        // 0.5.0 and is the whole reason the rule composes.
2575        let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2576        let invalid = css
2577            .lines()
2578            .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".field[aria-invalid"))
2579            .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2580            .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2581            .join("\n");
2582        assert!(
2583            invalid.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"),
2584            "the well was dropped: {invalid}"
2585        );
2586        assert!(invalid.contains("var(--danger)"));
2587    }
2588
2589    #[test]
2590    fn button_and_card_come_out_identical_by_construction() {
2591        // The duplication phase A deletes. They are the same composition, so
2592        // the only honest way to emit both is from one call.
2593        let opts = Emit::default();
2594        let css = surface_rules(&opts);
2595        assert_eq!(
2596            depth_declarations(Depth::Raised),
2597            depth_declarations(Depth::Raised)
2598        );
2599        assert!(css.contains(".button {"));
2600        assert!(css.contains(".card {"));
2601        assert_eq!(
2602            interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default()).replace("button", "card"),
2603            interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default())
2604        );
2605    }
2606
2607    #[test]
2608    fn a_prefix_reaches_the_component_classes_too() {
2609        let opts = Emit {
2610            class_prefix: "mo-",
2611            ..Emit::default()
2612        };
2613        let css = stylesheet(&opts);
2614        for name in [
2615            "mo-button",
2616            "mo-card",
2617            "mo-field",
2618            "mo-badge",
2619            "mo-chip",
2620            "mo-tab",
2621            "mo-row-primary",
2622            "mo-progress",
2623            "mo-progress-fill",
2624        ] {
2625            assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}")), "unprefixed: {name}");
2626        }
2627        // The bare names must be gone entirely, or a prefixed build still
2628        // collides with the app's own stylesheet.
2629        assert!(!css.contains(".button {"));
2630        assert!(!css.contains(".card {"));
2631        assert!(!css.contains(".badge {"));
2632    }
2633
2634    #[test]
2635    fn the_class_a_renderer_puts_on_an_option_is_the_one_the_rules_key_off() {
2636        // `option_class` is the contract a screen renderer writes markup
2637        // against, and the rules below are the other half of it. They come off
2638        // one mapping now, so this asserts the mapping is the one that reaches
2639        // the stylesheet rather than that two lists still agree.
2640        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2641        for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
2642            let name = option_class(selector);
2643            assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name} {{")), "{name}: {css}");
2644            assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}.chosen {{")), "{name}: {css}");
2645        }
2646        assert_eq!(option_class(Selector::Tabs), "tab");
2647    }
2648
2649    #[test]
2650    fn the_caret_brings_its_own_gap_and_is_the_glyph_the_description_names() {
2651        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2652
2653        // The space is inside the glyph, which is what the other two renderers
2654        // write. Emitted bare, every consumer has to add it back, and the
2655        // obvious way to add it -- `content` in an app stylesheet, which is
2656        // unlayered and so outranks this sheet -- deletes the caret instead.
2657        assert!(css.contains("content: \" \\25B2\";"), "{css}");
2658        assert!(css.contains("content: \" \\25BC\";"), "{css}");
2659        assert!(!css.contains("content: \"\\2"), "{css}");
2660
2661        // The arrows this renderer used to draw alone are gone. Composition
2662        // rather than agreement: the glyph comes from `Sort::glyph`, so a
2663        // fourth spelling cannot appear here without appearing everywhere.
2664        assert!(!css.contains("2191") && !css.contains("2193"), "{css}");
2665        assert!(css.contains(&css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())), "{css}");
2666
2667        // Three states, three tones. An idle sortable heading draws its caret
2668        // now rather than reserving a hidden box for it, so there is no
2669        // visibility to order and no reflow left to guard against; what
2670        // separates the states is the colour, and the sorted arms come after
2671        // the idle one because the specificity is the same.
2672        let idle = css
2673            .find(".table-heading[data-sortable]::after")
2674            .expect("the idle caret is emitted");
2675        let sorted = css
2676            .find(".table-heading[aria-sort=\"ascending\"]::after")
2677            .expect("the ascending caret is emitted");
2678        assert!(idle < sorted, "{css}");
2679        assert!(
2680            css[idle..sorted].contains("color: var(--content-secondary);"),
2681            "{css}"
2682        );
2683        assert!(css[sorted..].contains("color: var(--content);"), "{css}");
2684        assert!(!css.contains("visibility: hidden;"), "{css}");
2685    }
2686
2687    #[test]
2688    fn a_destructive_button_has_somewhere_for_its_tone_to_land() {
2689        let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2690
2691        for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
2692            assert!(
2693                css.contains(&format!(".button[data-tone=\"{}\"]", tone.token())),
2694                "{css}"
2695            );
2696        }
2697        // Colour, not a fill. A red surface is an app's decision about emphasis.
2698        assert!(!css.contains(".button[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n    background"));
2699    }
2700
2701    #[test]
2702    fn a_described_list_is_not_a_bulleted_list() {
2703        let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2704        assert!(css.contains(".list {\n    list-style: none;"), "{css}");
2705    }
2706
2707    #[test]
2708    fn a_table_lays_itself_out_without_being_told_its_columns() {
2709        // The whole point of the CSS table. A described table's columns are
2710        // known at render time, so anything the stylesheet has to be told about
2711        // them would have to travel with the markup.
2712        let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2713
2714        assert!(css.contains(".table {\n    display: table;"), "{css}");
2715        assert!(css.contains("display: table-row;"), "{css}");
2716        assert!(css.contains("display: table-cell;"), "{css}");
2717        assert!(!css.contains("grid-template-columns"), "{css}");
2718    }
2719
2720    #[test]
2721    fn a_control_in_a_cell_is_not_painted_as_text() {
2722        // The point of makeover-layout 0.14.0's CellPart, and the table-side
2723        // twin of `the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits`
2724        // above. One `.cell` and one content colour meant a button in a cell
2725        // inherited it.
2726        let css = table_rules(&Emit::default());
2727
2728        assert!(
2729            css.contains(".cell-value {\n    color: var(--content);"),
2730            "{css}"
2731        );
2732        assert!(!css.contains(".cell-actions {\n    color:"), "{css}");
2733        assert!(!css.contains(".cell-tokens {\n    color:"), "{css}");
2734        assert!(!css.contains(".cell-link {\n    color:"), "{css}");
2735
2736        // The colour is on the part that is text, never on the container. On
2737        // `.cell` it would cascade into the three parts that are not text,
2738        // which is the bug written as one rule.
2739        assert!(!css.contains(".cell {\n    color:"), "{css}");
2740    }
2741
2742    #[test]
2743    fn an_unknown_cell_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
2744        // `part_class`'s obligation, taken on for the table side too. CellPart
2745        // is `#[non_exhaustive]`, so a member added upstream must land as a
2746        // bare class rather than as a build that stops.
2747        assert_eq!(cell_part_class(CellPart::Value), "cell-value");
2748        assert_eq!(cell_part_class(CellPart::Actions), "cell-actions");
2749    }
2750
2751    #[test]
2752    fn a_column_drops_by_its_priority_and_never_by_its_position() {
2753        let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2754
2755        // Optional goes at the narrowest class and secondary goes with it,
2756        // which is `kept_at`'s cutoff walk said as two queries.
2757        let compact = css
2758            .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Compact.media_condition()))
2759            .expect("a compact query");
2760        let medium = css
2761            .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Medium.media_condition()))
2762            .expect("a medium query");
2763        assert!(css[compact..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
2764        assert!(!css[medium..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
2765
2766        // Essential columns are never mentioned, because not being mentioned is
2767        // already what never dropping means.
2768        assert!(!css.contains(".cell-keeps"), "{css}");
2769
2770        // And nothing counts. `nth-child` is the bug the priority vocabulary
2771        // exists to end.
2772        assert!(!css.contains("nth-child"), "{css}");
2773    }
2774
2775    #[test]
2776    fn a_track_places_by_custom_property_and_never_by_a_size() {
2777        let css = track_rules(&Emit::default());
2778
2779        // Placement arrives from the caller, computed once by Track::fraction.
2780        // If either of these becomes a literal, three renderers have started
2781        // disagreeing about where 09:30 is.
2782        assert!(css.contains("top: var(--track-at"), "{css}");
2783        assert!(css.contains("height: var(--track-for"), "{css}");
2784
2785        // Overlap lanes default so an entry naming neither is full width.
2786        assert!(css.contains("--track-lane, 0"), "{css}");
2787        assert!(css.contains("--track-lanes, 1"), "{css}");
2788
2789        // The refusal that matters. A slot height here would be this crate
2790        // deciding how tall a quarter of an hour is, which is the thing
2791        // makeover-geometry owns and the reason `.track` gets no height at all.
2792        assert!(!css.contains("height: var(--track-slot"), "{css}");
2793        for size in ["px", "rem", "em", "vh"] {
2794            let bare = css
2795                .lines()
2796                .filter(|l| !l.contains("var(--"))
2797                .any(|l| l.contains(size));
2798            assert!(!bare, "track_rules named a {size} outside a var(): {css}");
2799        }
2800    }
2801
2802    #[test]
2803    fn a_relaxed_part_clamps_and_a_tight_one_says_nothing() {
2804        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2805        assert!(css.contains(".row-relaxed {"));
2806        assert!(css.contains("-webkit-line-clamp: 2;"));
2807        // The count is `Flow`'s, not this crate's. If the tier ever means three
2808        // lines, this fails here rather than in an app.
2809        assert!(css.contains(&format!("line-clamp: {};", Flow::Relaxed.lines())));
2810        // Tight gets no rule at all: one line is what a run already does, and a
2811        // class per part saying so is a declaration that changes nothing.
2812        assert!(!css.contains("row-tight"));
2813        assert_eq!(crate::list::flow_class(Flow::Relaxed), Some("row-relaxed"));
2814        assert_eq!(crate::list::flow_class(Flow::Tight), None);
2815        // Emitted, therefore checkable: an app's dead-vocabulary seal and the
2816        // overlap check both read `vocabulary::names`, so a class the renderer
2817        // can write and that list does not carry is invisible to both.
2818        assert!(crate::vocabulary::names(&Emit::default()).contains("row-relaxed"));
2819    }
2820
2821    #[test]
2822    fn the_two_kinds_of_wait_stop_rendering_identically() {
2823        // The state `d43ea1c5` fixes: the emitter had been writing
2824        // `data-awaiting` for months and nothing styled either value, so a
2825        // measured wait and an unmeasured one drew the same nothing.
2826        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2827        assert!(css.contains("[data-awaiting]::after"), "{css}");
2828        assert!(
2829            css.contains("[data-awaiting][aria-busy=\"true\"]::after"),
2830            "the mark is drawn only while something is actually waiting"
2831        );
2832        assert!(
2833            css.contains("[data-awaiting=\"determinate\"][aria-busy=\"true\"]::after"),
2834            "the measured half is its own drawing"
2835        );
2836    }
2837
2838    #[test]
2839    fn the_blink_takes_its_cadence_and_never_names_one() {
2840        // Three renderers draw this mark. A number written here would be a
2841        // second heartbeat for one wait.
2842        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2843        assert!(
2844            css.contains("calc(var(--cadence-activity) * 2)"),
2845            "a half-period doubled, not a literal"
2846        );
2847        assert!(!css.contains("500ms"), "{css}");
2848    }
2849
2850    #[test]
2851    fn a_bar_nobody_is_counting_is_empty_rather_than_full() {
2852        // Rule 1. The share defaults to zero, so a determinate control with no
2853        // binder watching bytes draws a trough. A default of 1 would be the
2854        // confidently-wrong drawing the rule exists to forbid.
2855        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2856        assert!(css.contains("var(--awaiting-share, 0)"), "{css}");
2857    }
2858
2859    #[test]
2860    fn motion_off_leaves_the_mark_lit_because_the_keyframes_do_the_dimming() {
2861        // `makeover_timing::reduced_motion_css` sets `--cadence-activity: 0ms`,
2862        // and a zero-length animation leaves the element in its base style
2863        // rather than at its last keyframe. So the base has to be the lit one.
2864        // The inverted spelling would blank the mark for a reader who asked for
2865        // less motion, which answers a request nobody made.
2866        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2867        let busy = css
2868            .split("[data-awaiting][aria-busy=\"true\"]::after {")
2869            .nth(1)
2870            .expect("the busy rule");
2871        let busy = busy.split('}').next().expect("its body");
2872        assert!(
2873            busy.contains("background: var(--action);"),
2874            "the base state is lit: {busy}"
2875        );
2876    }
2877
2878    #[test]
2879    fn the_whole_sheet_still_names_every_colour() {
2880        // The crate's founding property, asserted over the component layer and
2881        // not only the primitives.
2882        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2883        assert!(!css.contains('#'));
2884        assert!(!css.contains("rgb"));
2885        for line in css.lines() {
2886            // Declarations only: a selector or an at-rule can carry a colon of
2887            // its own (`:root`, `:hover`, `@media (hover: hover)`) and declares
2888            // nothing. Keyed on the trailing semicolon rather than on leading
2889            // indentation, which only ever worked as a proxy for nesting depth
2890            // and stopped when the sheet gained a cascade layer around it.
2891            let trimmed = line.trim();
2892            if !trimmed.ends_with(';') {
2893                continue;
2894            }
2895            let Some((_, value)) = trimmed.split_once(": ") else {
2896                continue;
2897            };
2898            if value.contains("var(--") {
2899                continue;
2900            }
2901            // Everything left has to be a keyword, a number or a
2902            // caller-supplied length, never a colour.
2903            //
2904            // The length arm is what the comment above always claimed and the
2905            // list never covered: `border_width` arrives from `Emit` and lands
2906            // bare in the focus ring's offset, where the bevel had only ever
2907            // used it inside an `inset` shadow.
2908            let opts = Emit::default();
2909            assert!(
2910                value.contains("inset")
2911                    || value.contains(opts.border_width)
2912                    || value.contains(opts.focus_width)
2913                    // 0.12.0's two: a sortable header is a control and says so
2914                    // with the pointer, and the caret is this renderer's own
2915                    // expression of `aria-sort`. Neither is a colour, which is
2916                    // what this test is actually about, and neither is a size,
2917                    // which is the other thing this crate must not name. The
2918                    // leading space inside the glyph is the same thing the other
2919                    // two renderers write into theirs, so it is part of the
2920                    // caret rather than spacing this crate decided on.
2921                    || value
2922                        .trim_start_matches('"')
2923                        .trim_start()
2924                        .starts_with("\\2")
2925                    || matches!(
2926                        value.trim_end_matches(';'),
2927                        "0" | "1"
2928                            // The wait's mark and bar, 0.60.0. An empty
2929                            // `content` is what brings a pseudo-element into
2930                            // existence with nothing in it, and `step-end`
2931                            // is an easing: the blink is two states, not a
2932                            // slide between them. Neither is a colour, and
2933                            // neither is a magnitude.
2934                            | "\"\""
2935                            // Where the mark sits on the line it joins.
2936                            // Alignment is structure, the same way `display`
2937                            // is, and `baseline` is the initial value said out
2938                            // loud so a host stylesheet cannot leave it
2939                            // wherever an earlier rule put it.
2940                            | "baseline"
2941                            | "inline-block"
2942                            | "none"
2943                            | "auto"
2944                            | "not-allowed"
2945                            | "pointer"
2946                            // The caret's reserved box. Visibility is presence,
2947                            // not magnitude and not colour.
2948                            | "hidden"
2949                            | "visible"
2950                            // The link's two signals. `underline` is a line and
2951                            // `inherit` defers to whatever the app set, so
2952                            // neither names a colour or a magnitude.
2953                            | "underline"
2954                            | "inherit"
2955                            // The table frame. `display` is structure and not a
2956                            // size; `nowrap` is what makes a content column
2957                            // content. The two widths are the awkward pair and
2958                            // they are still not sizes: `100%` is "all of
2959                            // whatever you were given" and `1%` is the CSS
2960                            // table idiom for "shrink to fit", which is a
2961                            // behaviour spelled as a number because CSS has no
2962                            // keyword for it. Neither names a magnitude, which
2963                            // is the thing this crate leaves to
2964                            // makeover-geometry.
2965                            | "table"
2966                            | "table-row"
2967                            | "table-cell"
2968                            | "nowrap"
2969                            | "100%"
2970                            | "1%"
2971                            // The time axis, 0.42.0. `position` is the one
2972                            // property whose whole job is where a thing sits,
2973                            // which is exactly what this crate spent its life
2974                            // refusing to say -- so it is worth being exact
2975                            // about why these two are not that refusal
2976                            // breaking.
2977                            //
2978                            // Neither names a magnitude. `relative` says the
2979                            // track is what its entries resolve against, and
2980                            // `absolute` says an entry is placed rather than
2981                            // flowed. *Where* each entry lands is
2982                            // `--track-at` and `--track-for`, custom
2983                            // properties the caller sets from
2984                            // `Track::fraction`, and they are skipped by the
2985                            // `var(--` arm above like every other value this
2986                            // crate refuses to decide.
2987                            //
2988                            // The rule that would break the refusal is a slot
2989                            // height, and there is none: the track's height is
2990                            // the app's, so the percentages have something to
2991                            // resolve against and this crate still never says
2992                            // how tall a day is.
2993                            | "relative"
2994                            | "absolute"
2995                            // A run's five, 0.49.0. `flex`, `wrap` and
2996                            // `center` are structure and alignment, the same
2997                            // reading `table` gets: which way members are laid
2998                            // out and how they line up, never how much of
2999                            // anything.
3000                            //
3001                            // The two intrinsic keywords are the interesting
3002                            // pair and they are the opposite of a size. A
3003                            // magnitude is a number somebody chose;
3004                            // `min-content` and `max-content` are the browser
3005                            // being asked what the members themselves come to,
3006                            // which is the derived minimum the room ruling
3007                            // requires and the reason no breakpoint appears
3008                            // anywhere in these rules. `1 1 max-content` is
3009                            // grow, shrink and that basis, so its two digits
3010                            // are ratios rather than lengths.
3011                            | "flex"
3012                            | "wrap"
3013                            | "center"
3014                            | "min-content"
3015                            | "1 1 max-content"
3016                            // A picture's three, 0.36.0. `block` is structure
3017                            // for the reason `table` is: an inline image sits
3018                            // on the baseline and carries a descender's worth
3019                            // of space under it, which is a fact about
3020                            // replaced elements rather than a size this crate
3021                            // chose. `cover` and `contain` are `Fit`'s two
3022                            // named members reaching CSS unchanged, which is
3023                            // an intent arriving rather than a value being
3024                            // picked.
3025                            | "block"
3026                            | "cover"
3027                            | "contain"
3028                            // A relaxed part's three, and the third is the
3029                            // awkward one. `-webkit-box` and `vertical` are
3030                            // structure: they say the part is a box of lines
3031                            // stacked downward, which is the only way CSS lets
3032                            // anyone ask for a clamp at all.
3033                            //
3034                            // `2` is a count of lines, not a length. The
3035                            // distinction this crate holds is between naming a
3036                            // magnitude -- a padding, a height, a font size,
3037                            // all of which belong to makeover-geometry -- and
3038                            // naming how many of something there are. A line's
3039                            // height is still the app's, so two lines is
3040                            // whatever two of the app's lines come to, and
3041                            // nothing here decides how tall that is. It is also
3042                            // not a value picked here: it is `Flow::Relaxed`'s
3043                            // own answer arriving unchanged, the same way
3044                            // `cover` and `contain` are `Fit`'s.
3045                            | "-webkit-box"
3046                            | "vertical"
3047                            | "2"
3048                    ),
3049                "unrecognised literal value: {line}"
3050            );
3051        }
3052    }
3053
3054    #[test]
3055    fn flat_emits_nothing_at_all() {
3056        assert_eq!(depth_class(Depth::Flat, &Emit::default()), None);
3057        assert!(!depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("flat"));
3058    }
3059
3060    #[test]
3061    fn a_prefix_namespaces_every_class() {
3062        let opts = Emit {
3063            class_prefix: "mo-",
3064            ..Emit::default()
3065        };
3066        let css = depth_rules(&opts);
3067        assert!(css.contains(".mo-raised {"));
3068        assert!(css.contains(".mo-well {"));
3069        assert!(!css.contains(".raised {"));
3070    }
3071
3072    #[test]
3073    fn the_border_width_is_the_callers() {
3074        let opts = Emit {
3075            border_width: "2px",
3076            ..Emit::default()
3077        };
3078        assert!(bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts).contains("inset 2px 2px 0"));
3079    }
3080
3081    #[test]
3082    fn edges_agree_with_the_description() {
3083        // Not a tautology: it is the guard that a CSS-shaped convenience never
3084        // quietly reverses which side is lit.
3085        let (tl, br) = Bevel::Raised.edges();
3086        assert_eq!(tl.token(), Edge::Light.token());
3087        assert_eq!(br.token(), Edge::Dark.token());
3088    }
3089}