makeover_webview/lib.rs
1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet only
19//!
20//! This emits component CSS and no markup, deliberately. GoingsOn has 145
21//! `innerHTML` sites and Balanced Breakfast 175 `createElement` sites; moving
22//! markup is a migration, while adopting a generated stylesheet is a deletion.
23//! The apps keep every line of their markup and gain the classes.
24//!
25//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
26//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
27//!
28//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
29//!
30//! Decided 2026-07-29 against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a
31//! component list. The useful finding there was that `.btn` (line 644),
32//! `.card` (768) and `.tag, .badge` (882) each hand-write the same
33//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
34//!
35//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
36//! not be described as a pure deletion:
37//!
38//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
39//! [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
40//! will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
41//! and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
42//! where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
43//! hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
44//! that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
45//! answer is there and not here.
46//! - **Badges go flat.** See [`token_rules`].
47//!
48//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
49//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
50//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
51//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
52//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
53//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
54//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
55//!
56//! # Substitution, three ways
57//!
58//! `Fill::Well` has no colour on makeover before 2.3.0, and each renderer
59//! answers that differently, which is the evidence that dropping
60//! `Fill::fallback` from the description was right:
61//!
62//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
63//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
64//! terminal would quantise the two together.
65//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
66//! var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
67//! decides anything.
68
69#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
70
71use makeover_layout::{Bevel, Depth, Fill, Intent, RowPart, Selector, Token, Tone};
72use std::fmt::Write as _;
73
74/// How the emitted CSS is shaped.
75#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
76pub struct Emit {
77 /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
78 ///
79 /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: border widths belong to
80 /// `makeover-geometry` and will come from there once it carries them.
81 pub border_width: &'static str,
82 /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
83 pub class_prefix: &'static str,
84}
85
86impl Default for Emit {
87 fn default() -> Self {
88 Self {
89 border_width: "1px",
90 class_prefix: "",
91 }
92 }
93}
94
95/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
96#[must_use]
97pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
98 match bevel {
99 Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
100 Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
101 }
102}
103
104/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
105/// the intent may be absent.
106///
107/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
108/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
109#[must_use]
110pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
111 match fill {
112 Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
113 other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
114 }
115}
116
117/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
118///
119/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
120/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
121/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
122/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
123#[must_use]
124pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
125 let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
126 let w = opts.border_width;
127 format!(
128 "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} -{w} 0 var(--{})",
129 top_left.token(),
130 bottom_right.token()
131 )
132}
133
134/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
135///
136/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
137/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
138/// without the fill reads the property directly.
139#[must_use]
140pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
141 let mut css = String::new();
142 for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset] {
143 let _ = writeln!(
144 css,
145 " {}: {};",
146 bevel_var(bevel),
147 bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
148 );
149 }
150 css
151}
152
153/// The class name for a depth.
154#[must_use]
155pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
156 let name = match depth {
157 Depth::Flat => return None,
158 Depth::Raised => "raised",
159 Depth::Well => "well",
160 Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
161 };
162 Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
163}
164
165/// A prefixed class name.
166fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
167 format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix)
168}
169
170/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
171///
172/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
173/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
174/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
175/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
176///
177/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
178/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both, which this did before makeover-layout
179/// 0.3.0, silently dropped the fill for exactly that case. Independent does not
180/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
181/// disagree about what the region is.
182#[must_use]
183pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
184 let mut css = String::new();
185 if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
186 let _ = writeln!(css, " background: {};", fill_var(fill));
187 }
188 if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
189 let _ = writeln!(css, " box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
190 }
191 css
192}
193
194/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
195/// nothing.
196#[must_use]
197pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
198 let body = depth_declarations(depth);
199 if body.is_empty() {
200 return String::new();
201 }
202 format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
203}
204
205/// Hover and pressed, for a selector that answers a click.
206///
207/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
208/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
209/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
210/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
211/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
212/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
213///
214/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
215/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
216/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
217/// consumed until now.
218#[must_use]
219pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str) -> String {
220 format!(
221 ".{selector}:hover {{\n background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n{}",
222 depth_rule(&format!("{selector}:active"), Depth::Raised.pressed())
223 )
224}
225
226/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
227///
228/// A pressed rule rides along with the raised one, because the cascade can
229/// carry a state that an immediate-mode renderer has to resolve per call site.
230/// That is the one thing this renderer gets for free and the others do not.
231#[must_use]
232pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
233 let mut css = String::new();
234 for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
235 let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
236 continue;
237 };
238 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
239 }
240 if let Some(raised) = depth_class(Depth::Raised, opts) {
241 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&raised));
242 }
243 css
244}
245
246/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
247///
248/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
249/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
250/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
251/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
252/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
253/// drifting apart again.
254fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
255 let mut css = String::new();
256 for name in ["button", "card"] {
257 let c = class(name, opts);
258 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, Depth::Raised));
259 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c));
260 }
261
262 let field = class("field", opts);
263 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
264
265 // Keyed on the ARIA attribute rather than on a class, so the visual state
266 // and the accessible state cannot drift apart: there is one fact and both
267 // read it. goingson already drove its invalid styling this way and was
268 // right to; the `.invalid` class this emitted before 0.5.0 was a second
269 // place to forget.
270 //
271 // The ring composes *after* the bevel rather than replacing it. box-shadow
272 // is not additive, so a lone ring silently dropped the well out from under
273 // an invalid field. Flat and unlit: this edge is saying "wrong", and
274 // lighting one side would have it say "raised" at the same time.
275 let _ = writeln!(
276 css,
277 ".{field}[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {{\n box-shadow: var({}), 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
278 bevel_var(Bevel::Inset),
279 opts.border_width
280 );
281 css
282}
283
284/// Badges and chips.
285///
286/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
287/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
288/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
289/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
290/// decide which of the two it always was.
291///
292/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
293/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
294/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
295fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
296 let mut css = String::new();
297
298 // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
299 // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
300 let badge = class("badge", opts);
301 let _ = writeln!(
302 css,
303 ".{badge} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
304 Tone::Neutral.token()
305 );
306 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
307 let _ = writeln!(
308 css,
309 ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
310 tone.token()
311 );
312 }
313
314 // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
315 // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
316 // markup and waits for phase B.
317 let chip = class("chip", opts);
318 let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
319 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
320 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip));
321 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
322 &format!("{chip}.latched"),
323 unlatched.depth(true),
324 ));
325 css
326}
327
328/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
329///
330/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
331/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
332/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
333/// three are not one member with a flag.
334///
335/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
336/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
337///
338/// Both states emit as of makeover-layout 0.3.0. Before it the description
339/// named only the chosen option, so an unchosen one fell through to
340/// [`Depth::Flat`] and nothing was drawn for it, which left goingson's tab
341/// strip hand-writing the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
342fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
343 let mut css = String::new();
344 for (selector, name) in [
345 (Selector::Tabs, "tab"),
346 (Selector::Segmented, "segment"),
347 (Selector::Toggle, "toggle"),
348 ] {
349 let c = class(name, opts);
350 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
351 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c));
352 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
353 }
354 css
355}
356
357/// The four parts of a list row.
358fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
359 let mut css = String::new();
360 let row = class("row", opts);
361 for part in [
362 RowPart::Primary,
363 RowPart::Secondary,
364 RowPart::Meta,
365 RowPart::Actions,
366 ] {
367 let name = match part {
368 RowPart::Primary => "row-primary",
369 RowPart::Secondary => "row-secondary",
370 RowPart::Meta => "row-meta",
371 RowPart::Actions => "row-actions",
372 };
373 let c = class(name, opts);
374
375 // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
376 // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
377 // would be louder than saying nothing.
378 if !matches!(part, RowPart::Actions) {
379 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
380 }
381
382 if part.revealed_on_hover() {
383 // Hidden rather than absent: the row must not change height when
384 // the pointer arrives. `focus-within` carries the keyboard, which
385 // hover on its own would lock out.
386 //
387 // Transparent rather than `visibility: hidden`, which was the first
388 // form and defeated the very escape above: a `visibility: hidden`
389 // element is out of the focus order and out of the accessibility
390 // tree, so tabbing could never reach an action and could never
391 // trigger the row's `focus-within`. goingson had reached the same
392 // opacity form independently, on its own comment "always in the DOM
393 // for keyboard and screen readers".
394 //
395 // `pointer-events` rides along because opacity leaves the hit area
396 // behind: without it a renderer with no hover carries an invisible
397 // tappable control. Keyboard focus is unaffected by it.
398 let _ = writeln!(
399 css,
400 ".{c} {{\n opacity: 0;\n pointer-events: none;\n}}"
401 );
402 let _ = writeln!(
403 css,
404 ".{row}:hover .{c},\n.{row}:focus-within .{c} {{\n opacity: 1;\n pointer-events: auto;\n}}"
405 );
406 }
407 }
408 css
409}
410
411/// The progress trough, which has nothing behind it in the description.
412///
413/// Renderer-local chrome, on the same licence the skeletons hold as the
414/// webview's expression of `Readiness::Pending`: a determinate bar is a shape
415/// CSS draws readily and a terminal would rather not be told about. It earns
416/// the place empirically, goingson having grown four independent progress bars
417/// before anything named one.
418///
419/// The trough is a [`Depth::Well`], the same reading a text field gets:
420/// something with its content down inside it.
421fn progress_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
422 let progress = class("progress", opts);
423 // `progress-fill` rather than a bare `fill`: an unprefixed build claims
424 // these names in the app's own stylesheet, and `.fill` is grabby enough to
425 // catch things that have nothing to do with progress. goingson already
426 // calls it `.progress-fill`, so this is also the name that deletes.
427 let fill = class("progress-fill", opts);
428 let mut css = depth_rule(&progress, Depth::Well);
429
430 // The untoned bar is `--action`, not [`Tone::Neutral`]. That is the one
431 // place this differs from the badge rules, and deliberately: a badge with
432 // no status is a muted label, while a bar with no status is still
433 // reporting progress, and `content-muted` would read as disabled.
434 let _ = writeln!(
435 css,
436 ".{progress} > .{fill} {{\n background: var(--action);\n}}"
437 );
438
439 // A bar can be saying something, same as a badge: goingson colours subtask
440 // progress as success and an over-estimate as danger, which is real
441 // information rather than decoration. Emitting the tones is what lets that
442 // survive adoption instead of staying hand-written.
443 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
444 let _ = writeln!(
445 css,
446 ".{progress} > .{fill}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n background: var(--{0});\n}}",
447 tone.token()
448 );
449 }
450 css
451}
452
453/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
454///
455/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
456/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
457/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
458#[must_use]
459pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
460 let mut css = String::new();
461 css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
462 css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
463 css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
464 css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
465 css.push_str(&progress_rules(opts));
466 css
467}
468
469/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, with
470/// a generated-file banner.
471#[must_use]
472pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
473 format!(
474 "/* Generated by makeover-webview from makeover-layout. Do not edit.\n \
475 Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n \
476 them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout. */\n\
477 :root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
478 bevel_properties(opts),
479 depth_rules(opts),
480 component_rules(opts)
481 )
482}
483
484#[cfg(test)]
485mod tests {
486 use super::*;
487 use makeover_layout::Edge;
488
489 #[test]
490 fn the_emitted_bevel_matches_what_the_apps_already_hand_write() {
491 // Balanced Breakfast's styles.css, verbatim. Adoption has to be a
492 // deletion, not a redesign, or nobody will take it.
493 let opts = Emit::default();
494 assert_eq!(
495 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts),
496 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-light), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-dark)"
497 );
498 assert_eq!(
499 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Inset, &opts),
500 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-dark), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-light)"
501 );
502 }
503
504 #[test]
505 fn no_colour_ever_reaches_the_output() {
506 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
507 assert!(!css.contains('#'), "a hex literal escaped into the CSS");
508 assert!(
509 !css.contains("rgb"),
510 "a colour function escaped into the CSS"
511 );
512 // Every colour is named, never resolved.
513 assert!(css.contains("var(--surface-raised)"));
514 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-light)"));
515 }
516
517 #[test]
518 fn a_well_falls_back_through_css_rather_than_through_rust() {
519 assert_eq!(
520 fill_var(Fill::Well),
521 "var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"
522 );
523 // Nothing else needs one.
524 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Raised), "var(--surface-raised)");
525 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Page), "var(--surface-page)");
526 }
527
528 #[test]
529 fn raised_and_well_do_not_collapse_onto_each_other() {
530 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
531 assert!(css.contains(".raised {"));
532 assert!(css.contains(".well {"));
533 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"));
534 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"));
535 }
536
537 #[test]
538 fn the_cascade_carries_the_pressed_state() {
539 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
540 // The one thing this renderer gets free that the other two resolve by
541 // hand, eighteen call sites deep in audiofiles' case.
542 assert!(css.contains(".raised:active {"));
543 }
544
545 #[test]
546 fn pressing_moves_the_fill_and_not_only_the_edge() {
547 // The decision-1 guard, and the regression that mattered: emitting the
548 // bevel flip alone is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
549 // var(--surface-sunken)` on .btn, .card and .tag/.badge alike, so none
550 // of the three could be deleted.
551 let pressed = interactive_rules("button");
552 assert!(pressed.contains(".button:active {"));
553 assert!(
554 pressed.contains("background: var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"),
555 "pressed dropped its fill: {pressed}"
556 );
557 assert!(pressed.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
558 }
559
560 #[test]
561 fn pressed_takes_its_fill_from_the_description_not_from_the_app() {
562 // goingson presses to --surface-sunken. The description says a pressed
563 // raised region reads as a well, and makeover says outright that
564 // surface-sunken cannot serve as one, so the app is the thing that
565 // moves.
566 //
567 // Scoped to the pressed rules rather than to the whole sheet: since
568 // makeover-layout 0.3.0 an unchosen tab is legitimately
569 // --surface-sunken, so the token appearing somewhere in the output no
570 // longer means the app's choice leaked in.
571 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
572 let mut checked = 0;
573 for rule in css.split("}\n") {
574 if !rule.contains(":active") {
575 continue;
576 }
577 checked += 1;
578 assert!(
579 !rule.contains("surface-sunken"),
580 "a pressed rule took the app's fill: {rule}"
581 );
582 }
583 assert!(checked > 0, "no pressed rules found to check");
584 assert_eq!(
585 Depth::Raised.pressed().fill(),
586 Some(Fill::Well),
587 "the description changed under us"
588 );
589 }
590
591 #[test]
592 fn hover_resolves_against_the_token_makeover_already_derives() {
593 let css = interactive_rules("card");
594 assert!(css.contains(".card:hover {"));
595 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--hover-surface)"));
596 // Not the app's choice, which was --surface-overlay.
597 assert!(!css.contains("surface-overlay"));
598 }
599
600 #[test]
601 fn a_badge_gets_no_edge_and_no_fill() {
602 // Decision 2, and the one visible redesign in phase A. Token::Badge is
603 // Flat: an edge on a label says it can be pressed.
604 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
605 let badge = css
606 .lines()
607 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".badge {"))
608 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
609 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
610 .join("\n");
611 assert!(!badge.contains("box-shadow"), "badge kept an edge: {badge}");
612 assert!(!badge.contains("background"), "badge kept a fill: {badge}");
613 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(false), Depth::Flat);
614 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(true), Depth::Flat);
615 }
616
617 #[test]
618 fn a_badge_carries_a_tone_and_neutral_is_the_bare_class() {
619 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
620 // Neutral is the absence of a status, not a status named "none".
621 assert!(css.contains(".badge {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
622 assert!(!css.contains("data-tone=\"content-muted\""));
623 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
624 assert!(
625 css.contains(&format!(".badge[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
626 "missing tone {tone}"
627 );
628 assert!(css.contains(&format!("color: var(--{tone})")));
629 }
630 }
631
632 #[test]
633 fn a_chip_is_raised_and_latches_into_a_well() {
634 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
635 assert!(css.contains(".chip {"));
636 assert!(css.contains(".chip.latched {"));
637 assert!(css.contains(".chip:active {"));
638 // The whole difference from a badge: it answers a click.
639 assert!(Token::Chip { removable: false }.interactive());
640 assert!(!Token::Badge.interactive());
641 }
642
643 #[test]
644 fn only_a_tab_comes_forward_when_chosen() {
645 // The folder semantic. Collapsing the three selectors would lose it.
646 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
647 assert!(css.contains(".tab.chosen {"));
648 assert!(css.contains(".segment.chosen {"));
649 assert!(css.contains(".toggle.chosen {"));
650 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.chosen(), Depth::Raised);
651 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
652 assert_eq!(Selector::Toggle.chosen(), Depth::Well);
653
654 let tab = css
655 .lines()
656 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".tab.chosen {"))
657 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
658 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
659 .join("\n");
660 assert!(tab.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"), "tab was held in: {tab}");
661 }
662
663 #[test]
664 fn an_unchosen_tab_recedes_without_looking_picked() {
665 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
666 // Recessed by colour and given no edge. An edge would make every option
667 // look picked; flat would leave the chosen one nothing to come forward
668 // from, which is the gap makeover-layout 0.3.0 closed.
669 assert!(
670 css.contains(".tab {\n background: var(--surface-sunken);\n}"),
671 "unchosen tab is not recessed: {css}"
672 );
673 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.unchosen(), Depth::Sunken);
674 assert!(css.contains(".tab:hover {"));
675 }
676
677 #[test]
678 fn a_segment_stands_up_so_the_chosen_one_can_be_held_in() {
679 // The inverse of the tab, and why the three selectors are not one
680 // member with a flag.
681 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
682 assert!(css.contains(".segment {\n background: var(--surface-raised);"));
683 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.unchosen(), Depth::Raised);
684 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
685 }
686
687 #[test]
688 fn row_actions_are_revealed_without_moving_the_row() {
689 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
690 assert!(css.contains(".row-actions {\n opacity: 0;"));
691 // Not display:none, which would reflow the row under the pointer.
692 assert!(!css.contains("display: none"));
693 // Hover alone would lock the keyboard out.
694 assert!(css.contains(".row:focus-within .row-actions"));
695 assert!(RowPart::Actions.revealed_on_hover());
696 }
697
698 #[test]
699 fn a_hidden_row_action_is_still_focusable_and_not_tappable() {
700 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
701 // `visibility: hidden` takes the actions out of the focus order, so the
702 // `focus-within` reveal above could never fire from an action itself.
703 assert!(!css.contains("visibility:"));
704 // Opacity leaves the hit area behind; the row must not carry an
705 // invisible tappable control where there is no hover to reveal it.
706 assert!(css.contains(".row-actions {\n opacity: 0;\n pointer-events: none;\n}"));
707 assert!(css.contains("opacity: 1;\n pointer-events: auto;"));
708 }
709
710 #[test]
711 fn the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits() {
712 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
713 assert!(css.contains(".row-primary {\n color: var(--content);"));
714 assert!(css.contains(".row-secondary {\n color: var(--content-secondary);"));
715 assert!(css.contains(".row-meta {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
716 // Actions carry controls, not text. Pinning the colour it would inherit
717 // anyway is louder than saying nothing.
718 assert!(!css.contains(".row-actions {\n color:"));
719 }
720
721 #[test]
722 fn the_progress_trough_is_a_well() {
723 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
724 assert!(css.contains(".progress {"));
725 assert!(css.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
726 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {"));
727 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--action)"));
728 // A bare `.fill` would catch things that have nothing to do with
729 // progress once the sheet lands unprefixed.
730 assert!(!css.contains("> .fill "));
731 }
732
733 #[test]
734 fn a_progress_bar_can_carry_a_tone_and_defaults_to_action() {
735 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
736 // Untoned is --action, not Tone::Neutral's content-muted: a bar with no
737 // status is still reporting progress, and muted would read as disabled.
738 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {\n background: var(--action);"));
739 assert!(!css.contains("progress-fill {\n color: var(--content-muted)"));
740 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
741 assert!(
742 css.contains(&format!(
743 ".progress > .progress-fill[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]"
744 )),
745 "missing progress tone {tone}"
746 );
747 }
748 // goingson's two live cases, which is why the tones are emitted at all.
749 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] {\n background: var(--success);"));
750 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n background: var(--danger);"));
751 }
752
753 #[test]
754 fn no_scrollbar_track_is_emitted() {
755 // Decision 3's negative half. It was on the phase A list and came off;
756 // this is what stops it drifting back in.
757 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
758 assert!(!css.contains("scrollbar"));
759 assert!(!css.contains("::-webkit"));
760 }
761
762 #[test]
763 fn an_invalid_field_is_ringed_without_being_lit() {
764 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
765 assert!(css.contains(".field {"));
766 // The ARIA attribute, not a class: one fact, read by both the visual
767 // and the accessible state, so they cannot drift.
768 assert!(css.contains(".field[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {"));
769 assert!(!css.contains(".field.invalid"));
770 // A flat ring: this edge says "wrong", and a two-tone bevel would have
771 // it say "raised" at the same time.
772 assert!(css.contains("0 0 0 1px var(--danger)"));
773 }
774
775 #[test]
776 fn an_invalid_field_keeps_the_well_underneath_it() {
777 // box-shadow is not additive. A lone ring replaces the bevel and drops
778 // the well out from under the field, which is what this emitted before
779 // 0.5.0 and is the whole reason the rule composes.
780 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
781 let invalid = css
782 .lines()
783 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".field[aria-invalid"))
784 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
785 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
786 .join("\n");
787 assert!(
788 invalid.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"),
789 "the well was dropped: {invalid}"
790 );
791 assert!(invalid.contains("var(--danger)"));
792 }
793
794 #[test]
795 fn button_and_card_come_out_identical_by_construction() {
796 // The duplication phase A deletes. They are the same composition, so
797 // the only honest way to emit both is from one call.
798 let opts = Emit::default();
799 let css = surface_rules(&opts);
800 assert_eq!(
801 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised),
802 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised)
803 );
804 assert!(css.contains(".button {"));
805 assert!(css.contains(".card {"));
806 assert_eq!(
807 interactive_rules("button").replace("button", "card"),
808 interactive_rules("card")
809 );
810 }
811
812 #[test]
813 fn a_prefix_reaches_the_component_classes_too() {
814 let opts = Emit {
815 class_prefix: "mo-",
816 ..Emit::default()
817 };
818 let css = stylesheet(&opts);
819 for name in [
820 "mo-button",
821 "mo-card",
822 "mo-field",
823 "mo-badge",
824 "mo-chip",
825 "mo-tab",
826 "mo-row-primary",
827 "mo-progress",
828 "mo-progress-fill",
829 ] {
830 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}")), "unprefixed: {name}");
831 }
832 // The bare names must be gone entirely, or a prefixed build still
833 // collides with the app's own stylesheet.
834 assert!(!css.contains(".button {"));
835 assert!(!css.contains(".card {"));
836 assert!(!css.contains(".badge {"));
837 }
838
839 #[test]
840 fn the_whole_sheet_still_names_every_colour() {
841 // The crate's founding property, asserted over the component layer and
842 // not only the primitives.
843 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
844 assert!(!css.contains('#'));
845 assert!(!css.contains("rgb"));
846 for line in css.lines() {
847 // Declarations only: a selector or an at-rule can carry a colon of
848 // its own (`:root`, `:hover`) and declares nothing.
849 let declaration = line.strip_prefix(" ").map(str::trim);
850 let Some(Some((_, value))) = declaration.map(|d| d.split_once(": ")) else {
851 continue;
852 };
853 if value.contains("var(--") {
854 continue;
855 }
856 // Everything left has to be a keyword, a number or a
857 // caller-supplied length, never a colour.
858 assert!(
859 value.contains("inset")
860 || matches!(value.trim_end_matches(';'), "0" | "1" | "none" | "auto"),
861 "unrecognised literal value: {line}"
862 );
863 }
864 }
865
866 #[test]
867 fn flat_emits_nothing_at_all() {
868 assert_eq!(depth_class(Depth::Flat, &Emit::default()), None);
869 assert!(!depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("flat"));
870 }
871
872 #[test]
873 fn a_prefix_namespaces_every_class() {
874 let opts = Emit {
875 class_prefix: "mo-",
876 ..Emit::default()
877 };
878 let css = depth_rules(&opts);
879 assert!(css.contains(".mo-raised {"));
880 assert!(css.contains(".mo-well {"));
881 assert!(!css.contains(".raised {"));
882 }
883
884 #[test]
885 fn the_border_width_is_the_callers() {
886 let opts = Emit {
887 border_width: "2px",
888 ..Emit::default()
889 };
890 assert!(bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts).contains("inset 2px 2px 0"));
891 }
892
893 #[test]
894 fn edges_agree_with_the_description() {
895 // Not a tautology: it is the guard that a CSS-shaped convenience never
896 // quietly reverses which side is lit.
897 let (tl, br) = Bevel::Raised.edges();
898 assert_eq!(tl.token(), Edge::Light.token());
899 assert_eq!(br.token(), Edge::Dark.token());
900 }
901}