makeover_webview/lib.rs
1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet
19//!
20//! This module emits component CSS and no markup, deliberately. GoingsOn has
21//! 145 `innerHTML` sites and Balanced Breakfast 175 `createElement` sites, so
22//! moving markup is a migration where adopting a generated stylesheet is not.
23//! The apps keep every line of their markup and gain the classes.
24//!
25//! It is not a deletion either, which this header claimed until the measurement
26//! came in. Adoption across goingson removed 49 declarations net and *added* 25
27//! lines: a rule loses its depth declarations and gains a variant selector next
28//! to it, so the file stays the same size. What phase A moves is where depth is
29//! defined, not how much CSS exists. Numbers and method in the wiki note under
30//! "The deletion test, run".
31//!
32//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
33//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
34//!
35//! # Phase B: the markup, one description at a time
36//!
37//! [`form`] renders [`makeover_layout::Field`], which is the half of phase B
38//! whose description is settled. It emits strings, because both apps
39//! interpolate their fields into larger string-built forms and returning nodes
40//! would rewrite those too. It owns its own escaping, on the reasoning in that
41//! module: a Rust encoder can cover element text and attribute values with one
42//! function, where the apps need four and have to choose correctly at every
43//! call site.
44//!
45//! [`list`] is the other half: column tracks, the narrowing rules, and the cell
46//! containers a row is made of. It stops at the cell boundary and does not
47//! render what goes inside one, on the reasoning in that module. So phase B is
48//! now the frame around content in both directions, and what an app still owns
49//! is the content itself.
50//!
51//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
52//!
53//! Decided 2026-07-29 against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a
54//! component list. The useful finding there was that `.btn` (line 644),
55//! `.card` (768) and `.tag, .badge` (882) each hand-write the same
56//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
57//!
58//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
59//! not be described as a pure deletion:
60//!
61//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
62//! [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
63//! will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
64//! and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
65//! where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
66//! hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
67//! that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
68//! answer is there and not here.
69//! - **Badges go flat.** See [`token_rules`].
70//!
71//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
72//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
73//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
74//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
75//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
76//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
77//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
78//!
79//! # 0.10.0: the states this crate used to leave to its consumers
80//!
81//! [`interactive_rules`] emitted hover and pressed and stopped, because
82//! `makeover-layout` modelled no interaction state. Focus and disabled were
83//! therefore unsayable, and every app completed the primitive from outside the
84//! only way that works: by out-specifying a rule it does not own. goingson
85//! carries 19 such rules and the MNW server 21, and the three focus rings do
86//! not match each other.
87//!
88//! That also blocked the cascade-layer work outright. An app that declares
89//! `@layer` puts its own rules in a named layer, and unlayered declarations
90//! outrank every named layer regardless of specificity, so all of those
91//! overrides lose in the commit that adopts layers. They cannot simply be
92//! deleted, because they are the only thing supplying the missing states.
93//! Emitting the states here is what turns that adoption into a deletion.
94//!
95//! Four states now, in emission order, and the order is load-bearing: they are
96//! all specificity (0,2,0), so disabled beats hover by coming last and by
97//! nothing else. Nothing here reaches for `:not(:disabled)`, which would raise
98//! a selector this crate will shortly be wrapping in its own layer.
99//!
100//! Hover additionally sits inside a capability query now. `makeover-touch`
101//! answers whether a fingertip has hover and `makeover-geometry` spells the
102//! condition; this crate asks and does not decide. goingson's section 60 exists
103//! solely to take the hover state back on touch, which is a fight it should
104//! never have been handed.
105//!
106//! # 0.11.0: the layer contract
107//!
108//! [`stylesheet`] emits into the `makeover` cascade layer ([`CSS_LAYER`], which
109//! lives in `makeover-geometry` because that is the one crate every CSS emitter
110//! in the family already depends on). `makeover-geometry` 0.6.0 does the same
111//! for `geometry.css`.
112//!
113//! The cascade resolves origin and importance, then layer, then specificity,
114//! then source order, and **unlayered normal declarations outrank every named
115//! layer**. So before this, an app that declared `@layer base, components,
116//! responsive` put every rule it owns into a named layer and lost all of them to
117//! this unlayered file, regardless of specificity and regardless of loading
118//! last. Nothing errors when that happens: the CSS is valid, the minifier is
119//! happy, and buttons and badges look subtly wrong.
120//!
121//! That is why the layer belongs here rather than in each app. An app cannot fix
122//! it from its own stylesheet, because the fix is to layer the file it does not
123//! own.
124//!
125//! **What it flips**, and the reason each app wants a look when it bumps the
126//! pin: a generated rule that currently beats an app rule by being more specific
127//! stops beating it. The direction is always "the app wins", which is what the
128//! apps already assume, but a hand-written rule an app thought was dead can come
129//! back to life.
130//!
131//! An app should declare the order once, or the layer's position is decided by
132//! whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:
133//!
134//! ```css
135//! @layer makeover, base, components, responsive;
136//! ```
137//!
138//! [`in_css_layer`] is re-exported for an app that assembles its own stylesheet
139//! from this crate's pieces. goingson builds `tables.css` in its own `build.rs`
140//! out of [`list::narrowing_css`] and [`list::grid_template_columns`], and those
141//! rules are as generated as the ones here, so they belong in the same layer and
142//! this crate cannot put them there on the app's behalf.
143//!
144//! # 0.12.0: the ring gets its own width
145//!
146//! [`focus_rule`] reused [`Emit::border_width`] and emitted a 1px ring. That was
147//! an implementation convenience dressed as consistency with the invalid-field
148//! ring: a bevel and a focus indicator answer different questions, and only one
149//! of them has to be noticed from across a desk.
150//!
151//! Caught while adopting 0.11.0 into goingson, by the check the adoption tasks
152//! ask for. Every consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose
153//! at least 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
154//! goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve selectors. The
155//! design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px, so deleting the app
156//! rules in favour of it would have thinned the focus indicator everywhere.
157//!
158//! [`Emit::focus_width`] now carries it, defaulting to `2px`, and the offset is
159//! the same magnitude with its sign off the depth. Both values are the measured
160//! consensus rather than a new opinion.
161//!
162//! # 0.47.0: a range, a chooser's ghost text, and an option that cannot be
163//! picked yet
164//!
165//! `makeover-layout` 0.28.0's three form findings, all of them cheap here and
166//! none of them cheap in the app that found them.
167//!
168//! - `FieldKind::Range` emits `<input type="range">`, and `Field::step` emits
169//! `step`. The step is emitted only when the description carries one: the
170//! browser's own default is `step="1"`, which is what a description means by
171//! saying nothing, and is also what turns a 0-to-1 threshold into a
172//! two-position control.
173//! - A select with nothing chosen emits a disabled, selected, valueless first
174//! option carrying `Field::placeholder`. HTML has no placeholder attribute on
175//! `<select>`; this is the idiom, and `required` keeps working through it
176//! because the option's value is empty.
177//! - `Choice::unavailable` emits `disabled` plus the reason. Where it goes
178//! differs by control and the difference is forced: a radio group gets a
179//! `.form-option-reason` span beside the label, and a `<select>` option has
180//! room for no element at all, so the reason runs into its text.
181//!
182//! # 0.25.0: a cell says what it holds
183//!
184//! 0.23.0 gave a table its layout and left every cell the same. One `.cell`
185//! carried the whole thing, so a cell holding text and a cell holding a button
186//! were one class and one content colour, and a control in a cell was painted
187//! as text. That is the drift [`RowPart::intent`](makeover_layout::RowPart)
188//! has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented for nothing here.
189//!
190//! makeover-layout 0.14.0's [`CellPart`](makeover_layout::CellPart) names the
191//! four things a cell holds, and [`table_rules`] turns them into
192//! `.cell-value`, `.cell-tokens`, `.cell-actions` and `.cell-link`. Only the
193//! first takes a colour: a token carries its own tone, an action is a control
194//! rather than text, and a link takes the action colour from the anchor it is.
195//!
196//! The colour going on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell` is the fix rather
197//! than an implementation detail. On the container it cascades into the parts
198//! that are not text, which is the bug said in one rule.
199//!
200//! [`list::Cell::part`] is `Option<CellPart>` here, where it was
201//! `Option<RowPart>`. A table cell borrowing the list row's vocabulary was the
202//! drift with a type on it: the two answer different questions, and only one of
203//! them was ever about a cell.
204//!
205//! # 0.23.0: a table lays itself out, and a row shows its controls
206//!
207//! Three things a description could say and this renderer had no rule for,
208//! found together by rendering the MNW server's SSH-keys settings tab through
209//! `quasi` and preferring the hand-written Askama original.
210//!
211//! **A table had no layout at all.** [`list::narrowing_css`] emits the track
212//! list, and it has to be called with the columns, so it works where the
213//! columns are known at build time: goingson builds `tables.css` in its own
214//! `build.rs` and is untouched. A table a description produced knows its
215//! columns at render time, and the rules would have had to travel with the
216//! markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs `style-src
217//! 'unsafe-inline'` that the MNW server is working to drop, or the head, which
218//! an htmx fragment swap does not carry. [`table_rules`] lays a table out with
219//! `display: table` instead, which aligns columns across rows knowing nothing
220//! about how many there are. [`Priority`](makeover_layout::Priority) hiding
221//! moves from a generated rule per dropped column to one rule per drop class,
222//! and [`list::column_classes`] is what puts those classes on a cell. A header
223//! row emitted by a renderer's own code should call it too, or the header and
224//! the body disagree about which column just dropped.
225//!
226//! **A destructive button had nowhere for its tone to land.** `.button` carried
227//! no tone, on the reading that a control's colour is its surface. Every
228//! consumer had written the danger rule itself. It joins the badge in taking
229//! the four tones as colour, off `data-tone`.
230//!
231//! **A list rendered as a bulleted list**, because nothing here reset the `ul`
232//! a renderer emits for one.
233//!
234//! `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` also stops being honoured, which its own doc
235//! sanctioned: a renderer decides. It was retired outright in makeover-layout
236//! 0.13.0, once this had been its only consumer for a release. The rule hid a
237//! row's actions until hover,
238//! and every escape it grew was a report that hiding was wrong for somebody:
239//! `focus-within` for the keyboard, the capability gate for a fingertip with no
240//! way to unhide. What survived hid the controls from pointer users alone, who
241//! are the ones scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
242//!
243//! # 0.17.0: the depth classes stop being controls
244//!
245//! [`depth_rules`] gave `.raised` the whole interactive set. A depth is a
246//! statement about shape, so that left the vocabulary with no raised surface
247//! that is merely an object, and an app wanting one had two moves: write its
248//! own class from tokens, or take a control class and cancel the control half.
249//! goingson took the second, in three variants over sixteen elements
250//! (`.card--static` at 14 call sites, `.card--muted` at 2, `.card--shell` at 1),
251//! each re-asserting the resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`.
252//!
253//! Measured before changing it: `.raised` is emitted into goingson, Balanced
254//! Breakfast and the MNW server, and none of the three has a single call site.
255//! The states were unasked-for everywhere at once, and dropping them costs no
256//! migration anywhere.
257//!
258//! `.card` and `.button` are unchanged. They are the same depth *and* controls,
259//! and they take their states from [`surface_rules`], which is where a state
260//! belongs: on the thing that claims to answer a pointer.
261//!
262//! # Substitution, three ways
263//!
264//! `Fill::Well` has no colour on makeover before 2.3.0, and each renderer
265//! answers that differently, which is the evidence that dropping
266//! `Fill::fallback` from the description was right:
267//!
268//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
269//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
270//! terminal would quantise the two together.
271//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
272//! var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
273//! decides anything.
274
275#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
276
277pub mod figure;
278pub mod form;
279pub mod list;
280pub mod meter;
281pub mod placeholder;
282pub mod vocabulary;
283
284use crate::list::{cell_part_class, part_class};
285use makeover_geometry::{Density, SizeClass};
286// Re-exported rather than redefined. An app assembling its own stylesheet out
287// of this crate's pieces needs the same layer name, and most such apps depend
288// on this crate and not on `makeover-geometry` directly: goingson builds
289// `tables.css` in its own build.rs from [`list::narrowing_css`], and those
290// rules are as generated as the ones here.
291pub use makeover_geometry::{CSS_LAYER, in_css_layer};
292use makeover_layout::{
293 Bevel, CellPart, Depth, Fill, Intent, RowPart, Selector, Sort, State, Token, Tone,
294};
295use makeover_touch::Affordance;
296use std::fmt::Write as _;
297
298/// How the emitted CSS is shaped.
299#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
300pub struct Emit {
301 /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
302 ///
303 /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: border widths belong to
304 /// `makeover-geometry` and will come from there once it carries them.
305 pub border_width: &'static str,
306 /// Focus ring thickness, as a CSS length.
307 ///
308 /// Separate from [`border_width`](Self::border_width), which it reused
309 /// until 0.12.0. That reuse was an implementation convenience dressed as
310 /// consistency, and it emitted a 1px ring: a bevel and a focus indicator
311 /// are answering different questions, and only one of them has to be
312 /// noticed from across a desk.
313 ///
314 /// The default is the measured consensus rather than a new opinion. Every
315 /// consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose at least
316 /// 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
317 /// goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve
318 /// selectors. The design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px.
319 pub focus_width: &'static str,
320 /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
321 pub class_prefix: &'static str,
322}
323
324impl Default for Emit {
325 fn default() -> Self {
326 Self {
327 border_width: "1px",
328 focus_width: "2px",
329 class_prefix: "",
330 }
331 }
332}
333
334/// A string as CSS escapes, for a `content` value.
335///
336/// `\u{25B2}` becomes `\25B2`. Emitted escaped rather than literally so the
337/// stylesheet is ASCII whatever the description spells: a `content` string is
338/// read by whatever encoding the consumer serves the file as, and a caret that
339/// depends on that is a caret that works on one machine.
340///
341/// Terminated by the closing quote at every site here. A CSS hex escape takes
342/// up to six digits and ends at the first character that cannot be one, so an
343/// escape followed by more text would need a space that these do not.
344fn css_escape(text: &str) -> String {
345 text.chars().fold(String::new(), |mut out, c| {
346 let _ = write!(out, "\\{:X}", c as u32);
347 out
348 })
349}
350
351/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
352#[must_use]
353pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
354 match bevel {
355 Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
356 Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
357 }
358}
359
360/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
361/// the intent may be absent.
362///
363/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
364/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
365#[must_use]
366pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
367 match fill {
368 Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
369 other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
370 }
371}
372
373/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
374///
375/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
376/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
377/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
378/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
379#[must_use]
380pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
381 let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
382 let w = opts.border_width;
383 format!(
384 "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} -{w} 0 var(--{})",
385 top_left.token(),
386 bottom_right.token()
387 )
388}
389
390/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
391///
392/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
393/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
394/// without the fill reads the property directly.
395#[must_use]
396pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
397 let mut css = String::new();
398 for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset] {
399 let _ = writeln!(
400 css,
401 " {}: {};",
402 bevel_var(bevel),
403 bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
404 );
405 }
406 css.push_str(ELEVATION_PROPERTY);
407 css
408}
409
410/// The cast shadow of a surface that floats over the page.
411///
412/// Composed here for the reason the bevel pair is: `makeover` derives the tone,
413/// this crate owns the geometry, and neither has to know the other's numbers.
414///
415/// **Only for a surface that overlays the page.** A menu, a toast, a popover, a
416/// dropdown. A surface *in* the page takes `.raised` and its bevel, and a rule
417/// that reaches for this on a card or a plate has renamed a literal rather than
418/// replaced it.
419///
420/// Two lengths rather than one, because a single blur reads as a smudge at
421/// plate size and as a halo at menu size. The offset is small and downward: a
422/// Platinum-era menu sits just off the page rather than hovering above it.
423const ELEVATION_PROPERTY: &str =
424 " --elevation-overlay: 0 2px 4px var(--elevation), 0 8px 24px var(--elevation);\n";
425
426/// The class name for a depth.
427#[must_use]
428pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
429 let name = match depth {
430 Depth::Flat => return None,
431 Depth::Raised => "raised",
432 Depth::Well => "well",
433 Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
434 // A depth added to the description since this renderer was last
435 // built. No class, on the same footing as Flat: emitting a name
436 // whose rule body we cannot write would put a class in the markup
437 // that the stylesheet never defines.
438 _ => return None,
439 };
440 Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
441}
442
443/// A prefixed class name.
444///
445/// Public since 0.27.0, for the renderers that emit markup this crate does not.
446/// A screen renderer writing `class="row"` has to prefix it the way the
447/// stylesheet half does or a prefixed app gets rules matching everything except
448/// the elements that renderer wrote, and the failure is invisible: the CSS
449/// stays valid and one element is unstyled. quasi-webview carried a byte
450/// identical copy of this function until it could call this one.
451#[must_use]
452pub fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
453 let mut out = String::with_capacity(opts.class_prefix.len() + name.len());
454 push_class(&mut out, name, opts);
455 out
456}
457
458/// A prefixed class name, written into a buffer the caller already has.
459///
460/// The form the emitters use, and the reason it exists is [`escape_into`]'s:
461/// every class on every element went through a `format!` before 0.40.0,
462/// including the default case where the prefix is empty and the answer is the
463/// argument. A described table row carried roughly eighty transient
464/// allocations, and this and the escaper were most of them.
465///
466/// [`class`] stays for callers holding a name rather than a buffer.
467///
468/// [`escape_into`]: crate::form::escape_into
469pub fn push_class(out: &mut String, name: &str, opts: &Emit) {
470 out.push_str(opts.class_prefix);
471 out.push_str(name);
472}
473
474/// The class an option of a selector carries, which is what the rules key off.
475///
476/// Named for the option and not for the group: [`selector_rules`] styles the
477/// thing that gets picked, so `Selector::Tabs` is `tab` and not `tabs`. The
478/// distinction is not pedantry. quasi-webview spelled these `tabs`, `segmented`
479/// and `option`, put `toggle` on the wrapping element rather than on the
480/// buttons inside it, and every described selector in that renderer came out
481/// with no depth, no focus ring and no chosen state, while the toggle group got
482/// a bevel meant for its buttons.
483///
484/// The chosen option additionally carries `chosen`, the same way a latched chip
485/// carries `latched`. That name is this crate's too; there is no reason for a
486/// caller to spell it, and [`selector_rules`] is where it is written down.
487#[must_use]
488pub fn option_class(selector: Selector) -> &'static str {
489 match selector {
490 Selector::Tabs => "tab",
491 Selector::Segmented => "segment",
492 Selector::Toggle => "toggle",
493 }
494}
495
496/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
497///
498/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
499/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
500/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
501/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
502///
503/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
504/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both, which this did before makeover-layout
505/// 0.3.0, silently dropped the fill for exactly that case. Independent does not
506/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
507/// disagree about what the region is.
508#[must_use]
509pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
510 let mut css = String::new();
511 if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
512 let _ = writeln!(css, " background: {};", fill_var(fill));
513 }
514 if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
515 let _ = writeln!(css, " box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
516 }
517 css
518}
519
520/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
521/// nothing.
522#[must_use]
523pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
524 let body = depth_declarations(depth);
525 if body.is_empty() {
526 return String::new();
527 }
528 format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
529}
530
531/// The media condition a hover rule has to sit inside, or `None` if hover is
532/// unconditional.
533///
534/// Two crates answer this and neither answer is made here. `makeover-touch`
535/// owns *whether* hover exists at a density, and `makeover-geometry` owns how
536/// that capability is spelled as a media condition. Asking both is what stops
537/// this renderer minting a third opinion, which is what all three apps did:
538/// goingson sniffed the user agent, Balanced Breakfast used `(hover: none)`
539/// alone, and the MNW server had no gate at all.
540///
541/// [`SizeClass`] is required by [`Affordance::available`] and ignored by this
542/// member, which reports as much through `reads_size`. Passing Compact is not
543/// a claim about width; the test below pins that every class agrees.
544fn hover_condition() -> Option<&'static str> {
545 if Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact) {
546 // A fingertip grew a hover state. Nothing to gate, and this renderer
547 // should not invent a reason to gate anyway.
548 None
549 } else {
550 Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition())
551 }
552}
553
554/// Put a rule inside a media query, or leave it alone.
555fn gated(condition: Option<&str>, rule: &str) -> String {
556 let Some(condition) = condition else {
557 return rule.to_string();
558 };
559 let mut css = format!("@media {condition} {{\n");
560 for line in rule.lines() {
561 // Blank lines stay blank. Indenting one leaves trailing whitespace,
562 // which is the sort of thing a formatter later reverts and calls a diff.
563 if line.is_empty() {
564 css.push('\n');
565 } else {
566 let _ = writeln!(css, " {line}");
567 }
568 }
569 css.push_str("}\n");
570 css
571}
572
573/// The keyboard focus ring, placed by the depth it lands on.
574///
575/// This is the webview's **focus ring** and nothing more. **Reach** and
576/// **focus** are both the browser's — the document decides what is reachable
577/// and `:focus-visible` decides which reached thing wears the ring — and no
578/// description states either. The three terms are defined once in
579/// `makeover_layout`'s crate header, "Reach, focus and the focus ring".
580///
581/// One ring for the whole system, because a focus ring's job is to be
582/// recognised and three apps having three of them is the failure. What varies
583/// is where it sits, and that comes off [`Depth`] rather than off a per-
584/// component choice: a well takes the ring inside its own edge, and anything
585/// standing proud of the page takes it outside.
586///
587/// `outline` rather than the composed `box-shadow` the invalid-field ring at
588/// [`field_rules`] uses, and deliberately the one place the two rings are built
589/// differently. A `box-shadow` ring has to restate the bevel beside it, because
590/// `box-shadow` is not additive and a lone ring silently drops the well out
591/// from under the element. That restatement is a second copy of the depth,
592/// living in a different function from the first, and it is exactly the
593/// duplication `Depth` exists to prevent. `outline` occupies its own property,
594/// so the bevel survives untouched and there is nothing to keep in agreement.
595/// They render the same: both are a flush ring one border-width wide.
596#[must_use]
597pub fn focus_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
598 let w = opts.focus_width;
599 // Same magnitude either way, and only the sign comes off the depth. Both
600 // values are what the consumers had already converged on independently:
601 // 2px out is what all three wrote, and 2px in is the MNW server's own
602 // answer for the one inset ring it had.
603 let offset = match depth.bevel() {
604 // Inside the well, clear of its edge rather than painted over it.
605 Some(Bevel::Inset) => format!("calc(-1 * {w})"),
606 // Raised, or no edge at all. Outside, standing off by its own width.
607 _ => w.to_string(),
608 };
609 // The token by name. It is `makeover`'s, derived from the action colour,
610 // and reaching it through a description member was a second path to the
611 // same variable for as long as one existed.
612 format!(
613 ".{selector}:focus-visible {{\n outline: {w} solid var(--focus-ring);\n outline-offset: {offset};\n}}\n"
614 )
615}
616
617/// Present, visible, and not answering.
618///
619/// Matches the ARIA attribute as well as the pseudo-class, because `:disabled`
620/// only matches form elements and half the things this crate emits are not
621/// one: a `div` carrying `.chip` or `.tab` can never be `:disabled`. Keying on
622/// the accessible state is the pattern [`field_rules`] already establishes for
623/// `aria-invalid`, on the reasoning that one fact read by both the styling and
624/// the accessibility tree cannot drift from itself.
625///
626/// The rest depth is re-asserted rather than assumed, because this rule has to
627/// beat the hover and pressed rules above it. It does that on source order at
628/// equal specificity, not by out-specifying them: every rule this function's
629/// caller emits is (0,2,0), and adding a `:not(:disabled)` anywhere would raise
630/// one of them and have to be unpicked when this output moves inside its own
631/// cascade layer.
632#[must_use]
633pub fn disabled_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
634 format!(
635 ".{selector}:disabled,\n.{selector}[aria-disabled=\"true\"] {{\n{} color: var(--{});\n cursor: not-allowed;\n}}\n",
636 depth_declarations(depth),
637 State::Disabled.token()
638 )
639}
640
641/// Every state a selector that answers a click implies: hover, pressed, focus
642/// and disabled, in that order.
643///
644/// Order is the whole cascade mechanism here. All four selectors are
645/// specificity (0,2,0), so disabled wins over hover and pressed by coming last
646/// and by nothing else.
647///
648/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
649/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
650/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
651/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
652/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
653/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
654///
655/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
656/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
657/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
658/// consumed until now. What it *is* gated on is capability, via
659/// [`hover_condition`]. Before that gate existed the apps each wrote their own:
660/// goingson's section 60 exists solely to take back the hover state this
661/// function had just handed it, by out-specifying a rule it does not own.
662///
663/// `depth` is the selector's **rest** depth, used to place the focus ring and
664/// to restore the surface under a disabled control. The pressed rule keeps
665/// inverting from [`Depth::Raised`] regardless, which is what every caller got
666/// before this parameter existed: a tab's unchosen depth is
667/// [`Depth::Sunken`], and `Sunken.pressed()` is `Sunken`, so deriving the press
668/// from the rest depth would leave a tab with no press at all.
669#[must_use]
670pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
671 let mut css = gated(
672 hover_condition(),
673 &format!(".{selector}:hover {{\n background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n"),
674 );
675 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
676 &format!("{selector}:active"),
677 Depth::Raised.pressed(),
678 ));
679 css.push_str(&focus_rule(selector, depth, opts));
680 css.push_str(&disabled_rule(selector, depth));
681 css
682}
683
684/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
685///
686/// A depth and nothing else. `.raised` says a surface sits on what is behind
687/// it, which is a statement about the shape and not about what happens when a
688/// pointer arrives, so it emits no hover, press, focus or disabled rule. The
689/// named surfaces are where interaction lives: `.card` and `.button` are the
690/// same depth *and* controls, and they get their states from
691/// [`surface_rules`].
692///
693/// This class carried the interactive set until 0.17.0, which left the
694/// vocabulary with no raised surface that is merely an object. Consumers that
695/// needed one took a control class and cancelled half of it instead: sixteen
696/// elements in goingson across three `.card--*` variants, each re-asserting the
697/// resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`. Nothing anywhere used
698/// `.raised` itself, so the states were unasked-for in every consumer at once.
699#[must_use]
700pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
701 let mut css = String::new();
702 for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
703 let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
704 continue;
705 };
706 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
707 }
708 css
709}
710
711/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
712///
713/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
714/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
715/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
716/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
717/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
718/// drifting apart again.
719fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
720 let mut css = String::new();
721 for name in ["button", "card"] {
722 let c = class(name, opts);
723 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, Depth::Raised));
724 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, Depth::Raised, opts));
725 }
726
727 let field = class("field", opts);
728 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
729
730 // A field takes focus and refuses input like everything else here, and got
731 // neither until now, which is why all three apps hand-write a focus ring
732 // for it and no two of them match. No hover or pressed: a text field does
733 // not light up under the pointer and does not invert when clicked, so the
734 // two states `interactive_rules` would add are the two it does not have.
735 css.push_str(&focus_rule(&field, Depth::Well, opts));
736 css.push_str(&disabled_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
737
738 // Keyed on the ARIA attribute rather than on a class, so the visual state
739 // and the accessible state cannot drift apart: there is one fact and both
740 // read it. goingson already drove its invalid styling this way and was
741 // right to; the `.invalid` class this emitted before 0.5.0 was a second
742 // place to forget.
743 //
744 // The ring composes *after* the bevel rather than replacing it. box-shadow
745 // is not additive, so a lone ring silently dropped the well out from under
746 // an invalid field. Flat and unlit: this edge is saying "wrong", and
747 // lighting one side would have it say "raised" at the same time.
748 let _ = writeln!(
749 css,
750 ".{field}[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {{\n box-shadow: var({}), 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
751 bevel_var(Bevel::Inset),
752 opts.border_width
753 );
754 css
755}
756
757/// Badges and chips.
758///
759/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
760/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
761/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
762/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
763/// decide which of the two it always was.
764///
765/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
766/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
767/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
768/// Text that goes somewhere.
769///
770/// The one inline control, and the vocabulary had no word for it until a
771/// description layer needed one. A table cell has carried `cell-link` since
772/// 0.14.0's part list, deliberately unruled because the cell's own rule covers
773/// it; what was missing is the same thing outside a table, which is what a
774/// described run holds when a sentence contains a link.
775///
776/// Colour and underline only. Whether a link is inline in a sentence or sitting
777/// on its own line is the app's layout, and how much room it takes is
778/// `makeover-geometry`'s. What is here is the pair of signals that say "this
779/// goes somewhere" and nothing that says where it sits.
780///
781/// The visited arm is deliberately absent. A link inside an app points at the
782/// app's own screens, which the user is expected to have been to, so painting
783/// them differently marks almost everything and distinguishes nothing.
784fn link_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
785 let mut css = String::new();
786 let link = class("link", opts);
787
788 let _ = writeln!(
789 css,
790 ".{link} {{\n color: var(--action);\n \
791 text-decoration: underline;\n}}"
792 );
793 // The hover step is the same one every other control takes, and it is a
794 // colour rather than a surface: a link has no box to raise.
795 let _ = writeln!(
796 css,
797 "@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine) {{\n .{link}:hover \
798 {{\n color: var(--action-hover);\n }}\n}}"
799 );
800 let _ = writeln!(
801 css,
802 ".{link}:focus-visible {{\n outline: {} solid var(--focus-ring);\n \
803 outline-offset: 2px;\n}}",
804 opts.focus_width
805 );
806 // A link is often a `<button>` rather than an `<a>`: a renderer picks the
807 // element from the method, so a link that writes is a button that has to
808 // stop looking like one.
809 let _ = writeln!(
810 css,
811 "button.{link} {{\n background: none;\n border: none;\n \
812 padding: 0;\n font: inherit;\n cursor: pointer;\n}}"
813 );
814 css
815}
816
817fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
818 let mut css = String::new();
819
820 // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
821 // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
822 let badge = class("badge", opts);
823 let _ = writeln!(
824 css,
825 ".{badge} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
826 Tone::Neutral.token()
827 );
828 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
829 let _ = writeln!(
830 css,
831 ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
832 tone.token()
833 );
834 }
835
836 // A button carries the four tones a badge does. It had none, on the reading
837 // that a control's colour is its surface rather than its text, and that
838 // reading has one hole big enough to matter: the button that destroys
839 // something. Every consumer had written that rule itself, and a description
840 // that says `Tone::Danger` on an act had nowhere for it to land.
841 //
842 // Colour and not a fill, matching the badge. A red surface is a decision
843 // about emphasis that belongs to an app's own layer, and two of them
844 // fighting is worse than neither.
845 let button = class("button", opts);
846 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
847 let _ = writeln!(
848 css,
849 ".{button}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
850 tone.token()
851 );
852 }
853
854 // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
855 // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
856 // markup and waits for phase B.
857 let chip = class("chip", opts);
858 let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
859 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
860 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip, unlatched.depth(false), opts));
861 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
862 &format!("{chip}.latched"),
863 unlatched.depth(true),
864 ));
865 css
866}
867
868/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
869///
870/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
871/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
872/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
873/// three are not one member with a flag.
874///
875/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
876/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
877///
878/// Both states emit as of makeover-layout 0.3.0. Before it the description
879/// named only the chosen option, so an unchosen one fell through to
880/// [`Depth::Flat`] and nothing was drawn for it, which left goingson's tab
881/// strip hand-writing the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
882fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
883 let mut css = String::new();
884 for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
885 let c = class(option_class(selector), opts);
886 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
887 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, selector.unchosen(), opts));
888 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
889 }
890 css
891}
892
893/// The parts of a list row.
894///
895/// The list is written out rather than derived because `RowPart` is
896/// `#[non_exhaustive]` as of makeover-layout 0.9.0, so there is nothing to
897/// iterate. A member added upstream emits no rule until it is named here, which
898/// is the trade `non_exhaustive` makes: a silent gap instead of a build break.
899/// [`part_class`] carries the same list and the same obligation.
900fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
901 let mut css = String::new();
902
903 // The container the rows sit in. Three zeroes and a keyword, all of them
904 // undoing a browser default the description never asked for: a described
905 // list of SSH keys is not a bulleted list, and it rendered as one because
906 // nothing here said otherwise. Not a size: there is no magnitude in it,
907 // which is the line this crate holds.
908 let _ = writeln!(
909 css,
910 ".{} {{\n list-style: none;\n margin: 0;\n padding: 0;\n}}",
911 class("list", opts)
912 );
913
914 for part in [
915 RowPart::Primary,
916 RowPart::Secondary,
917 RowPart::Meta,
918 RowPart::Actions,
919 RowPart::Tokens,
920 RowPart::Proportion,
921 ] {
922 let c = class(part_class(part), opts);
923
924 // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
925 // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
926 // would be louder than saying nothing. Tokens answer alike, for their
927 // own reason: each token carries its own tone, and a colour on the
928 // strip would fight the things sitting in it. A proportion is the same
929 // case again: the meter inside carries the tone.
930 if !matches!(
931 part,
932 RowPart::Actions | RowPart::Tokens | RowPart::Proportion
933 ) {
934 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
935 }
936
937 // A row's actions are shown at rest. `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` said
938 // otherwise and was not honoured here from 0.23.0; makeover-layout
939 // 0.13.0 retired the method, so there is no longer a description saying
940 // one thing and a renderer doing another.
941 //
942 // The rule was `opacity: 0` gated to pointer devices, revealed on
943 // `:hover` and on `:focus-within`. Each escape it needed was a report
944 // that hiding was wrong for somebody: `focus-within` because tabbing
945 // could never reach an action; the gate because a fingertip had no way
946 // to unhide, which both webview apps had already hand-written
947 // `opacity: 1` to undo. What was left was a control hidden from
948 // exactly one group: people using a pointer, who are also the group
949 // scanning a list to find out what can be done to a row.
950 //
951 // A settings screen is where that reads worst: the whole reason to be
952 // on it is to remove a key, and the button doing so was invisible
953 // until pointed at. A table cell's actions were never hidden, so the
954 // two arrangements now agree.
955 }
956 css
957}
958
959/// The progress trough these rules fill.
960///
961/// This was renderer-local chrome with nothing behind it until makeover-layout
962/// 0.10.0, which is the unusual order: the tones below were emitted for every
963/// bar in the tree while the only way to describe one was to concatenate the
964/// numbers into a heading. `Meter` is the word that arrived late, and
965/// [`meter::meter_html`](crate::meter::meter_html) is what now fills these.
966///
967/// The rules stay a superset of what a description can ask for. An app drawing
968/// its own bar keeps these classes, which is what the four goingson grew
969/// independently were adopted onto.
970///
971/// The trough is a [`Depth::Well`], the same reading a text field gets:
972/// something with its content down inside it.
973fn progress_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
974 let progress = class("progress", opts);
975 // `progress-fill` rather than a bare `fill`: an unprefixed build claims
976 // these names in the app's own stylesheet, and `.fill` is grabby enough to
977 // catch things that have nothing to do with progress. goingson already
978 // calls it `.progress-fill`, so this is also the name that deletes.
979 let fill = class("progress-fill", opts);
980 let mut css = depth_rule(&progress, Depth::Well);
981
982 // The untoned bar is `--action`, not [`Tone::Neutral`]. That is the one
983 // place this differs from the badge rules, and deliberately: a badge with
984 // no status is a muted label, while a bar with no status is still
985 // reporting progress, and `content-muted` would read as disabled.
986 let _ = writeln!(
987 css,
988 ".{progress} > .{fill} {{\n background: var(--action);\n}}"
989 );
990
991 // A bar can be saying something, same as a badge: goingson colours subtask
992 // progress as success and an over-estimate as danger, which is real
993 // information rather than decoration. Emitting the tones is what lets that
994 // survive adoption instead of staying hand-written.
995 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
996 let _ = writeln!(
997 css,
998 ".{progress} > .{fill}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n background: var(--{0});\n}}",
999 tone.token()
1000 );
1001 }
1002 css
1003}
1004
1005/// A strip of figures, and the two spans inside each one.
1006///
1007/// Colour only, which is the deferral rule applied to a component that badly
1008/// wants to break it. A figure reads as a figure because the value is set large
1009/// over a small caption, and that is a size: `makeover-geometry` answers how
1010/// much space and this crate answers what the thing is. Emitting `font-size`
1011/// here would be this crate naming a value, which is the one thing it is defined
1012/// by not doing, and `progress_rules` is the precedent — it emits the tones and
1013/// never the width, because the width is not its to know.
1014///
1015/// So the arrangement and the type scale are the app's, and what is generated is
1016/// the part an app cannot get right by itself: which of the two spans carries
1017/// the tone.
1018fn figure_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1019 let figure = class("figure", opts);
1020 let value = class("figure-value", opts);
1021 let caption = class("figure-caption", opts);
1022 let change = class("figure-change", opts);
1023 let mut css = String::new();
1024
1025 let _ = writeln!(
1026 css,
1027 ".{figure} > .{value} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
1028 Tone::Neutral.token()
1029 );
1030 let _ = writeln!(
1031 css,
1032 ".{figure} > .{caption} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1033 );
1034 let _ = writeln!(
1035 css,
1036 ".{figure} > .{change} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1037 );
1038
1039 // A toned figure tones one part and never the caption. The caption is the
1040 // noun and stays muted.
1041 //
1042 // Which part depends on whether there is a change, and that is the whole of
1043 // what 0.13.0 changed here. A figure with a delta is an ordinary number that
1044 // has moved in a direction worth reading, so the delta takes the colour and
1045 // the number stays plain; a figure without one has nowhere else to put it.
1046 // `:has` is what lets one attribute mean both, and the alternative was the
1047 // emitter deciding by writing the attribute onto a different element, which
1048 // leaves two elements able to disagree about a figure's one meaning.
1049 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1050 let _ = writeln!(
1051 css,
1052 ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{change} {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1053 tone.token()
1054 );
1055 let _ = writeln!(
1056 css,
1057 ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"]:not(:has(> .{change})) > .{value} \
1058 {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1059 tone.token()
1060 );
1061 }
1062 css
1063}
1064
1065/// A picture, its frame and its caption.
1066///
1067/// `makeover_layout::Image` arrived at 0.21.0, found by trying to describe MNW's
1068/// carousel and discovering nothing named a picture.
1069///
1070/// # The frame is a border, and this is the one place a bevel is wrong
1071///
1072/// 0.36.0 emitted [`Depth::Raised`] here through [`depth_rule`], the same call
1073/// `button` and `card` make. It was wrong, and MNW's landing page is where it
1074/// showed: **the frames had no visible edge at all.**
1075///
1076/// `Depth::Raised`'s edge is `--bevel-raised`, which is an *inset* shadow — a
1077/// 1px light run at the top-left and a dark one at the bottom-right, drawn
1078/// **inside** the element's box. On a button or a card that box is a surface
1079/// this crate owns, so an inset edge reads as the surface catching the light.
1080/// On a picture it is drawn on top of the picture, over whatever pixels the
1081/// image happens to have at its border. MNW's screenshots are light-on-light
1082/// parchment, so the light half landed on a light image and the frame
1083/// disappeared.
1084///
1085/// **You cannot bevel a surface you do not own.** A picture's content is the
1086/// app's, arrives at request time, and can be any colour, so its edge has to
1087/// sit *outside* the content rather than on it. That is a border.
1088///
1089/// The fill stays, and it is not decoration: it is what shows through a
1090/// transparent PNG and what stands in the frame's place while the image is
1091/// still loading.
1092///
1093/// This is a real limit on [`Depth`] rather than a special case. Every other
1094/// consumer of a depth draws its own surface; a picture is the first member
1095/// whose surface belongs to someone else.
1096///
1097/// # No size
1098///
1099/// `width: 100%` and nothing else. How large a picture is depends on the box it
1100/// was put in, which is the app's arrangement and `makeover-geometry`'s scales,
1101/// and a renderer that picked one would be answering for every consumer at
1102/// once. This is where `figure_rules` landed for the same reason.
1103fn picture_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1104 let picture = class("picture", opts);
1105 let img = class("picture-img", opts);
1106 let caption = class("picture-caption", opts);
1107 let mut css = String::new();
1108
1109 // Block, or an inline image sits on the text baseline and carries a
1110 // descender's worth of space under it that no app ever wants and every app
1111 // deletes by hand. The border is the frame; see the type docs for why it is
1112 // not the bevel every other surface here gets.
1113 let _ = writeln!(
1114 css,
1115 ".{img} {{\n display: block;\n width: 100%;\n height: auto;\n \
1116 background: var(--{});\n border: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1117 Fill::Raised.token(),
1118 opts.border_width
1119 );
1120
1121 // The two fits that need a rule. `Fit::Natural` emits no attribute at all,
1122 // so it is the bare rule above and needs nothing here.
1123 let _ = writeln!(
1124 css,
1125 ".{img}[data-fit=\"cover\"] {{\n height: 100%;\n object-fit: cover;\n}}"
1126 );
1127 let _ = writeln!(
1128 css,
1129 ".{img}[data-fit=\"contain\"] {{\n height: 100%;\n object-fit: contain;\n}}"
1130 );
1131
1132 // A caption reads back one step, which is `figure-caption`'s answer and the
1133 // same claim: it says what the thing above it is, and it is not the thing.
1134 let _ = writeln!(
1135 css,
1136 ".{picture} > .{caption} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1137 );
1138
1139 css
1140}
1141
1142/// A region showing one child at a time, and the chrome that moves between them.
1143///
1144/// [`makeover_layout::Showing`] lets a description say that a region holds
1145/// several children and shows some of them. A renderer derives its own chrome
1146/// from that, which is what stops every renderer growing a `match` on a widget
1147/// name; these are the rules the derived chrome needs.
1148///
1149/// # Why the default is every child, and the enhancement takes them away
1150///
1151/// The controls are a lie until something binds them. A prev button rendered
1152/// into a document with no script is a control that looks live and answers
1153/// nothing, and the reader it lies to is exactly the one who cannot see the
1154/// other children either — the collapsing and the moving are the same half.
1155///
1156/// So the rules run in the direction the enhancement does. Nothing here hides a
1157/// child and nothing here shows a control. Whatever binds the region sets
1158/// `data-ready` on it, and that is what collapses the stack to one and reveals
1159/// the row that moves it. A reader with no script gets every child in order and
1160/// no controls, which is more content rather than less, and a reader with
1161/// script gets a settled page rather than a stack that jumps to one frame after
1162/// load.
1163///
1164/// MNW proved this shape by hand — a `<noscript>` stylesheet opening its
1165/// carousel back out — and it is here rather than there because the property is
1166/// the description's, not one app's.
1167///
1168/// # Not spacing
1169///
1170/// The row's gaps are `makeover-geometry`'s question and are absent for
1171/// [`row_rules`]'s reason. What is here is `display`, which carries no
1172/// magnitude, and the muted readout, which is the same claim `picture-caption`
1173/// makes: it says where you are among the children and it is not one of them.
1174fn showing_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1175 let controls = class("showing", opts);
1176 let position = class("showing-position", opts);
1177 let frame = class("showing-frame", opts);
1178 let mut css = String::new();
1179
1180 // Hidden until something binds it, which is the whole argument above.
1181 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{controls} {{\n display: none;\n}}");
1182 // Block, and nothing about how the three sit in it. A button and a span are
1183 // inline already, so they make a row without this crate saying so, and
1184 // saying so is where `align-items` and a gap would follow -- both spacing,
1185 // both `makeover-geometry`'s, and `row_rules` refuses them for the same
1186 // reason.
1187 let _ = writeln!(
1188 css,
1189 "[data-ready] > .{controls} {{\n display: block;\n}}"
1190 );
1191
1192 // A child is in flow until the region is bound, and then only the current
1193 // one is. `.current` is a modifier for the reason `.chosen` and `.latched`
1194 // are: one name for the state, set by whoever knows it.
1195 let _ = writeln!(
1196 css,
1197 "[data-ready] > .{frame}:not(.current) {{\n display: none;\n}}"
1198 );
1199
1200 // Reads back one step. `picture-caption`'s rule and its reason.
1201 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{position} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1202
1203 css
1204}
1205
1206/// A time axis: the container, its gridlines and ruler, and the placed things.
1207///
1208/// `makeover-layout` 0.24.0's [`Track`](makeover_layout::Track), and the first
1209/// member here whose whole point is *position*. That makes the magnitude line
1210/// this crate keeps worth restating rather than assuming.
1211///
1212/// # Where the numbers come from
1213///
1214/// Every value that varies per item is a custom property the caller sets
1215/// inline, and every rule here reads one. `--track-at` and `--track-for` are
1216/// percentages of the span, which
1217/// [`Track::fraction`](makeover_layout::Track::fraction) computes once so three
1218/// renderers cannot disagree about it. Nothing here knows a pixel.
1219///
1220/// That is what lets the stylesheet stay static while the items move: an entry
1221/// carries `style="--track-at: 37.5%; --track-for: 4.166%"` and the rule below
1222/// turns it into a box. The alternative was emitting a rule per item, which is
1223/// a stylesheet that grows with the data.
1224///
1225/// **The height of the track is the app's**, not this crate's. 96 quarter-hour
1226/// slots at some slot height is a size, and a size is `makeover-geometry`'s
1227/// question -- the same refusal `figure_rules` and `placeholder_rules` make.
1228/// Percentages need a resolved height above them, so `.track` gets
1229/// `position: relative` and nothing else; the app says how tall a day is.
1230///
1231/// # Overlap
1232///
1233/// Two things at the same time is intrinsic to an axis and has no analogue in a
1234/// list. The description does not declare it -- `Placement::overlaps` derives it
1235/// from the times -- so what arrives here is a lane index and a lane count, and
1236/// the rule divides the width. A renderer that would rather stack them ignores
1237/// both properties and the defaults give it one full-width lane.
1238fn track_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1239 let track = class("track", opts);
1240 let slot = class("track-slot", opts);
1241 let tick = class("track-tick", opts);
1242 let entry = class("track-entry", opts);
1243 let mut css = String::new();
1244
1245 // The positioning context every entry resolves against, and the whole of
1246 // what this crate says about the container. No height: see the doc above.
1247 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{track} {{\n position: relative;\n}}");
1248
1249 // Gridlines and the ruler are the axis reading itself back, which is
1250 // `picture-caption` and `showing-position`'s claim: about the thing rather
1251 // than one of the things.
1252 //
1253 // `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` writes its
1254 // edge. A gridline is the one place a timeline would most naturally reach
1255 // for a hardcoded 1px, and a hardcoded 1px is this crate naming a size.
1256 let _ = writeln!(
1257 css,
1258 ".{slot} {{\n border-top: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1259 opts.border_width
1260 );
1261 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{tick} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1262
1263 // The one rule that does real work. Top and height are the placement;
1264 // left and width are the lane. Both lane properties default so an entry
1265 // that names neither is full width, which is the common case and the one a
1266 // renderer gets for free.
1267 let _ = writeln!(
1268 css,
1269 ".{entry} {{\n \
1270 position: absolute;\n \
1271 top: var(--track-at, 0%);\n \
1272 height: var(--track-for, 100%);\n \
1273 left: calc(var(--track-lane, 0) / var(--track-lanes, 1) * 100%);\n \
1274 width: calc(100% / var(--track-lanes, 1));\n\
1275 }}"
1276 );
1277
1278 css
1279}
1280
1281/// A region's stand-in, and the header of a table that can be reordered.
1282///
1283/// Both are 0.12.0 members and both are colour and affordance only, which is
1284/// where `figure_rules` landed after trying to emit a type scale. How much room
1285/// a stand-in gets is a size — goingson has the same one at three, as
1286/// `--compact`, `--dashboard` and `--padded` — and a size is
1287/// `makeover-geometry`'s question.
1288///
1289/// The caret is the one thing here that is neither colour nor affordance, and it
1290/// is a renderer's own expression rather than a value the description named:
1291/// `aria-sort` is what the table actually says, and this turns it into something
1292/// visible for everyone not using a screen reader. A terminal draws its own; an
1293/// immediate-mode painter draws its own.
1294fn state_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1295 let placeholder = class("placeholder", opts);
1296 let text = class("placeholder-text", opts);
1297 let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1298 let mut css = String::new();
1299
1300 let _ = writeln!(
1301 css,
1302 ".{placeholder} > .{text} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1303 );
1304 // Only the failure is toned. An empty list is the normal state of a new
1305 // install, and `Readiness::tone` is what says so.
1306 let _ = writeln!(
1307 css,
1308 ".{placeholder}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{text} {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1309 Tone::Danger.token()
1310 );
1311
1312 // A header that reorders the table is a control, and the pointer is the
1313 // only part of saying so that is not the app's own type and spacing.
1314 let _ = writeln!(
1315 css,
1316 ".{heading}[data-sortable] {{\n cursor: pointer;\n}}"
1317 );
1318 // The caret carries its own leading space, the way `makeover-tui` and
1319 // `makeover-immediate` both write `" \u{25B2}"`. It used to be emitted bare,
1320 // and both apps that adopted the vocabulary had to put the gap back in their
1321 // own stylesheets on the same afternoon -- each having to work out first that
1322 // app CSS outranks this crate's cascade layer, so adding the space the
1323 // obvious way, as `content`, silently wins over the glyph and leaves the
1324 // heading with no caret at all. A consumer should not have to know that, and
1325 // with the space emitted here there is nothing left for one to add.
1326 //
1327 // Three states, three tones, on the convention in wiki
1328 // `three-tone-convention`. A column in force is `content`; a column offering
1329 // to reorder and not doing it now is `content-secondary`, because it still
1330 // answers a press; a column that is not sortable emits no caret at all and
1331 // takes nothing. The idle arm used to hide its glyph and reserve the box,
1332 // which cost a reflow-free press and said nothing. It draws now, and the
1333 // reservation stops being a thing to get right.
1334 //
1335 // The glyph is `Sort::glyph`, escaped rather than written: a CSS `content`
1336 // string cannot carry the character literally through this file's own
1337 // escaping, and spelling it here as well would put the third copy back that
1338 // `makeover-layout` 0.27.5 exists to remove.
1339 let _ = writeln!(
1340 css,
1341 ".{heading}[data-sortable]::after \
1342 {{\n content: \" {}\";\n color: var(--content-secondary);\n}}",
1343 css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())
1344 );
1345 for direction in [Sort::Ascending, Sort::Descending] {
1346 let _ = writeln!(
1347 css,
1348 ".{heading}[aria-sort=\"{}\"]::after \
1349 {{\n content: \" {}\";\n color: var(--content);\n}}",
1350 direction.as_str(),
1351 css_escape(direction.glyph())
1352 );
1353 }
1354 css
1355}
1356
1357/// The frame a table sits in.
1358///
1359/// # Why this is a CSS table and not the grid the rest of the module assumes
1360///
1361/// A grid row needs `grid-template-columns`, which has to name every column in
1362/// order, so it cannot be written without knowing the columns. That is what
1363/// [`list::narrowing_css`] is for, and it works: goingson builds `tables.css` in
1364/// its own `build.rs` out of it, and nothing here changes that.
1365///
1366/// It does not work for a table a *description* produced. Those columns are
1367/// known at render time rather than at build time, and the rules would have to
1368/// travel with the markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs
1369/// `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` and so blocks the MNW server's standing plan to
1370/// drop it. The head is not an escape: a table swapped in by htmx after a
1371/// delete arrives as a fragment with no head at all.
1372///
1373/// A CSS table aligns its columns across rows knowing nothing about how many
1374/// there are, so there is no track list to emit and nothing per-table to carry.
1375/// The cost is that a described table cannot take a per-column fixed length,
1376/// which costs nothing today: [`Sizing`](list::Sizing) is looked up by column
1377/// name and a description carries no lengths to put in it, so every track a
1378/// described table could ask for is already content, fill or auto.
1379///
1380/// [`Priority`] hiding is unchanged in kind. It moves from a generated
1381/// `display: none` per dropped column to one rule per drop class, which is the
1382/// same fact addressed by class rather than by cutoff, and still never by
1383/// position.
1384fn table_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1385 let table = class("table", opts);
1386 let head = class("table-head", opts);
1387 let row = class("table-row", opts);
1388 let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1389 let cell = class("cell", opts);
1390 let mut css = String::new();
1391
1392 let _ = writeln!(
1393 css,
1394 ".{table} {{\n display: table;\n width: 100%;\n}}"
1395 );
1396 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{head},\n.{row} {{\n display: table-row;\n}}");
1397 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{heading},\n.{cell} {{\n display: table-cell;\n}}");
1398
1399 // A content column shrinks to what is in it. `width: 1%` is how a CSS table
1400 // is told that: auto layout hands the slack to the columns that asked for
1401 // room, and a column asking for almost none gets what it needs and no more.
1402 // The `nowrap` is what stops it being given less by wrapping.
1403 let _ = writeln!(
1404 css,
1405 ".{} {{\n white-space: nowrap;\n width: 1%;\n}}",
1406 class("cell-content", opts)
1407 );
1408
1409 // A fixed column has no length to be fixed to. The description carries none
1410 // and `Sizing` is not reachable from here, so it behaves as content: the
1411 // honest answer to a width nobody supplied, and the same one `Sizing::track`
1412 // gives it.
1413 let _ = writeln!(
1414 css,
1415 ".{} {{\n white-space: nowrap;\n}}",
1416 class("cell-fixed", opts)
1417 );
1418
1419 // Optional columns go at the narrowest class, secondary ones go with them,
1420 // which is the cutoff walk `kept_at` describes said as two media queries.
1421 // Essential columns have no rule at all, because never dropping is what not
1422 // being mentioned already means.
1423 for (size, drops) in [
1424 (
1425 SizeClass::Compact,
1426 &["cell-drops-first", "cell-drops-next"][..],
1427 ),
1428 (SizeClass::Medium, &["cell-drops-first"][..]),
1429 ] {
1430 let selectors: Vec<String> = drops
1431 .iter()
1432 .map(|drop| format!(".{}", class(drop, opts)))
1433 .collect();
1434 css.push_str(&gated(
1435 Some(&size.media_condition()),
1436 &format!("{} {{\n display: none;\n}}\n", selectors.join(",\n")),
1437 ));
1438 }
1439
1440 // What is inside a cell, which the table side could not say until
1441 // makeover-layout 0.14.0. Every cell was one `.cell` and one content
1442 // colour, so a button in a cell was painted as text -- the drift
1443 // `RowPart::intent` has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented
1444 // for nothing here.
1445 //
1446 // The colour goes on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell`, and that
1447 // placement is the whole fix. On the container it would cascade into the
1448 // tokens and the controls sitting beside the text, which is the bug said
1449 // in one rule; on the part that is text, it reaches text and stops.
1450 for part in [
1451 CellPart::Value,
1452 CellPart::Tokens,
1453 CellPart::Actions,
1454 CellPart::Link,
1455 ] {
1456 // Three of the four inherit, each for its own reason: a token carries
1457 // its own tone, an action is a control rather than text, and a link
1458 // takes the action colour from the anchor it is. `CellPart::intent`
1459 // says so by answering with the intent inheriting already gives, and
1460 // pinning that would be louder than saying nothing.
1461 //
1462 // Written as a skip-list rather than as a match on Value, so a member
1463 // added upstream gets its intent emitted rather than being silently
1464 // dropped. That is the same trade `part_class`'s fallback makes: land
1465 // plainly, never land as nothing.
1466 if !matches!(part, CellPart::Tokens | CellPart::Actions | CellPart::Link) {
1467 let _ = writeln!(
1468 css,
1469 ".{} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
1470 class(cell_part_class(part), opts),
1471 part.intent()
1472 );
1473 }
1474 }
1475
1476 css
1477}
1478
1479/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
1480///
1481/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
1482/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
1483/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
1484#[must_use]
1485pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1486 let mut css = String::new();
1487 css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
1488 css.push_str(&link_rules(opts));
1489 css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
1490 css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
1491 css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
1492 css.push_str(&progress_rules(opts));
1493 css.push_str(&figure_rules(opts));
1494 css.push_str(&picture_rules(opts));
1495 css.push_str(&showing_rules(opts));
1496 css.push_str(&track_rules(opts));
1497 css.push_str(&state_rules(opts));
1498 css.push_str(&table_rules(opts));
1499 css
1500}
1501
1502/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, in
1503/// [`CSS_LAYER`], under a generated-file banner.
1504///
1505/// The banner sits outside the layer, because a comment participates in no
1506/// cascade and a reader opening the file should see what it is before seeing
1507/// an at-rule.
1508#[must_use]
1509pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1510 format!(
1511 "/* Generated by makeover-webview from makeover-layout. Do not edit.\n \
1512 Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n \
1513 them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout.\n\n \
1514 Everything below is in the `{CSS_LAYER}` cascade layer. Declare the\n \
1515 order once in your own stylesheet, or this layer's position is decided\n \
1516 by whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:\n\n \
1517 @layer {CSS_LAYER}, base, components, responsive; */\n{}",
1518 in_css_layer(&format!(
1519 ":root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
1520 bevel_properties(opts),
1521 depth_rules(opts),
1522 component_rules(opts)
1523 ))
1524 )
1525}
1526
1527#[cfg(test)]
1528mod tests {
1529 use super::*;
1530 use makeover_layout::Edge;
1531
1532 #[test]
1533 fn the_emitted_bevel_matches_what_the_apps_already_hand_write() {
1534 // Balanced Breakfast's styles.css, verbatim. Adoption has to be a
1535 // deletion, not a redesign, or nobody will take it.
1536 let opts = Emit::default();
1537 assert_eq!(
1538 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts),
1539 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-light), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-dark)"
1540 );
1541 assert_eq!(
1542 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Inset, &opts),
1543 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-dark), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-light)"
1544 );
1545 }
1546
1547 #[test]
1548 fn no_colour_ever_reaches_the_output() {
1549 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1550 assert!(!css.contains('#'), "a hex literal escaped into the CSS");
1551 assert!(
1552 !css.contains("rgb"),
1553 "a colour function escaped into the CSS"
1554 );
1555 // Every colour is named, never resolved.
1556 assert!(css.contains("var(--surface-raised)"));
1557 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-light)"));
1558 }
1559
1560 #[test]
1561 fn a_well_falls_back_through_css_rather_than_through_rust() {
1562 assert_eq!(
1563 fill_var(Fill::Well),
1564 "var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"
1565 );
1566 // Nothing else needs one.
1567 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Raised), "var(--surface-raised)");
1568 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Page), "var(--surface-page)");
1569 }
1570
1571 #[test]
1572 fn raised_and_well_do_not_collapse_onto_each_other() {
1573 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
1574 assert!(css.contains(".raised {"));
1575 assert!(css.contains(".well {"));
1576 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"));
1577 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"));
1578 }
1579
1580 /// The cast shadow is composed here from the tone `makeover` derives, so
1581 /// neither crate has to hold the other's numbers.
1582 ///
1583 /// It is a `:root` property and deliberately not a depth class. There is no
1584 /// `Depth::Overlay` in the description layer, and adding one would be a
1585 /// claim about what a screen means rather than about how it is painted;
1586 /// until something asks for it, a consumer names the property on the rule
1587 /// for the menu or the toast it already has.
1588 #[test]
1589 fn the_cast_shadow_is_a_root_property_not_a_depth() {
1590 let css = bevel_properties(&Emit::default());
1591 assert!(css.contains("--elevation-overlay:"));
1592 assert!(css.contains("var(--elevation)"));
1593 assert!(
1594 !depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("elevation"),
1595 "elevation is not a depth class"
1596 );
1597 }
1598
1599 #[test]
1600 fn the_cascade_carries_the_pressed_state() {
1601 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
1602 // The one thing this renderer gets free that the other two resolve by
1603 // hand, eighteen call sites deep in audiofiles' case. Asserted on a
1604 // named surface: pressing belongs to the control, not to the depth.
1605 assert!(css.contains(".card:active {"));
1606 assert!(css.contains(".button:active {"));
1607 }
1608
1609 #[test]
1610 fn the_depth_class_is_a_surface_and_not_a_control() {
1611 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
1612 // The static surface the vocabulary was missing. Sixteen goingson
1613 // elements wore .card and cancelled its hover and press to get this,
1614 // because a raised object that is not pressable had no other spelling.
1615 for state in [":hover", ":active", ":focus-visible", ":disabled"] {
1616 assert!(
1617 !css.contains(&format!(".raised{state}")),
1618 "the depth class claimed {state}: {css}"
1619 );
1620 }
1621 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"), "still raised: {css}");
1622 }
1623
1624 #[test]
1625 fn pressing_moves_the_fill_and_not_only_the_edge() {
1626 // The decision-1 guard, and the regression that mattered: emitting the
1627 // bevel flip alone is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
1628 // var(--surface-sunken)` on .btn, .card and .tag/.badge alike, so none
1629 // of the three could be deleted.
1630 let pressed = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1631 assert!(pressed.contains(".button:active {"));
1632 assert!(
1633 pressed.contains("background: var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"),
1634 "pressed dropped its fill: {pressed}"
1635 );
1636 assert!(pressed.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
1637 }
1638
1639 #[test]
1640 fn pressed_takes_its_fill_from_the_description_not_from_the_app() {
1641 // goingson presses to --surface-sunken. The description says a pressed
1642 // raised region reads as a well, and makeover says outright that
1643 // surface-sunken cannot serve as one, so the app is the thing that
1644 // moves.
1645 //
1646 // Scoped to the pressed rules rather than to the whole sheet: since
1647 // makeover-layout 0.3.0 an unchosen tab is legitimately
1648 // --surface-sunken, so the token appearing somewhere in the output no
1649 // longer means the app's choice leaked in.
1650 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1651 let mut checked = 0;
1652 for rule in css.split("}\n") {
1653 if !rule.contains(":active") {
1654 continue;
1655 }
1656 checked += 1;
1657 assert!(
1658 !rule.contains("surface-sunken"),
1659 "a pressed rule took the app's fill: {rule}"
1660 );
1661 }
1662 assert!(checked > 0, "no pressed rules found to check");
1663 assert_eq!(
1664 Depth::Raised.pressed().fill(),
1665 Some(Fill::Well),
1666 "the description changed under us"
1667 );
1668 }
1669
1670 #[test]
1671 fn the_whole_stylesheet_is_emitted_in_the_family_layer() {
1672 // The point of 0.11.0. Unlayered normal declarations outrank every
1673 // named layer, so an app declaring `@layer base, components` loses
1674 // every rule it owns to this file until this file is layered too.
1675 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1676 assert!(css.contains(&format!("@layer {CSS_LAYER} {{")));
1677
1678 // Exactly one layer block, and nothing outside it but the banner.
1679 assert_eq!(css.matches("@layer").count(), 2, "banner names it once");
1680 let opened = css.find("@layer makeover {").expect("layer opens");
1681 for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
1682 let before_layer = css.lines().take(i).map(str::len).sum::<usize>() < opened;
1683 if before_layer || line.is_empty() {
1684 continue;
1685 }
1686 assert!(
1687 line.starts_with(" ") || line == "}" || line.starts_with(" "),
1688 "line outside the layer: {line:?}"
1689 );
1690 }
1691 }
1692
1693 #[test]
1694 fn the_generated_sheet_carries_no_trailing_whitespace() {
1695 // A checked-in generated file that a formatter wants to rewrite is a
1696 // diff every time somebody saves it.
1697 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1698 for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
1699 assert_eq!(line, line.trim_end(), "trailing whitespace on line {i}");
1700 }
1701 }
1702
1703 #[test]
1704 fn the_banner_tells_an_app_how_to_order_the_layer() {
1705 // Without a declared order the layer's position depends on which
1706 // generated file the browser sees first, which is not a contract.
1707 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1708 assert!(css.contains("@layer makeover, base, components, responsive;"));
1709 // And the banner is outside the layer, not a rule inside it.
1710 assert!(css.starts_with("/* Generated by makeover-webview"));
1711 }
1712
1713 #[test]
1714 fn a_primitive_owns_every_state_it_implies() {
1715 // The whole point of 0.10.0. Anything emitting a hover rule owes the
1716 // other three, or the consuming app supplies them by out-specifying a
1717 // rule it does not own: 19 such rules in goingson, 21 in the MNW
1718 // server, and three focus rings that do not match.
1719 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1720 for selector in ["button", "card", "chip", "tab", "segment", "toggle"] {
1721 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:hover {{")), "{selector}");
1722 assert!(
1723 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:active {{")),
1724 "{selector}"
1725 );
1726 assert!(
1727 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:focus-visible {{")),
1728 "{selector} has no focus ring"
1729 );
1730 assert!(
1731 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:disabled,")),
1732 "{selector} has no disabled state"
1733 );
1734 }
1735 }
1736
1737 #[test]
1738 fn a_field_takes_focus_and_refuses_input_without_taking_a_hover() {
1739 // A text field does not light up under the pointer, so it gets the two
1740 // states it has and not the two it does not.
1741 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1742 assert!(css.contains(".field:focus-visible {"));
1743 assert!(css.contains(".field:disabled,"));
1744 assert!(!css.contains(".field:hover {"));
1745 assert!(!css.contains(".field:active {"));
1746 }
1747
1748 #[test]
1749 fn disabled_is_emitted_after_hover_so_source_order_settles_it() {
1750 // Every one of these selectors is specificity (0,2,0), so nothing but
1751 // order decides which wins. A disabled button taking the hover fill is
1752 // the exact bug goingson's `.button:disabled:hover` was written to fix,
1753 // and the reason it had to reach (0,3,0) to do it.
1754 let css = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1755 let hover = css.find(":hover").expect("hover");
1756 let active = css.find(":active").expect("active");
1757 let focus = css.find(":focus-visible").expect("focus");
1758 let disabled = css.find(":disabled").expect("disabled");
1759 assert!(hover < active && active < focus && focus < disabled);
1760
1761 // And it restores the surface, or the hover fill survives underneath.
1762 let tail = &css[disabled..];
1763 assert!(tail.contains("background: var(--surface-raised)"));
1764 }
1765
1766 #[test]
1767 fn a_disabled_state_reaches_things_that_cannot_be_disabled() {
1768 // `:disabled` matches form elements only, and a chip is a div. Keying
1769 // on the ARIA attribute too is the pattern the invalid field already
1770 // set: one fact, read by the styling and the accessibility tree alike.
1771 let css = disabled_rule("chip", Depth::Raised);
1772 assert!(css.contains(".chip:disabled,"));
1773 assert!(css.contains(".chip[aria-disabled=\"true\"]"));
1774 assert!(css.contains("cursor: not-allowed"));
1775 }
1776
1777 #[test]
1778 fn the_focus_ring_does_not_disturb_the_bevel_it_lands_on() {
1779 // `outline` has its own property, so unlike the invalid ring there is
1780 // no bevel to restate beside it and nothing to keep in agreement.
1781 let opts = Emit::default();
1782 let css = focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts);
1783 assert!(css.contains("outline: 2px solid var(--focus-ring)"));
1784 assert!(!css.contains("box-shadow"), "the ring restated the bevel");
1785 }
1786
1787 #[test]
1788 fn a_well_takes_the_ring_inside_and_a_raised_surface_outside() {
1789 // One ring, placed by depth. The offset comes off `Depth::bevel` and
1790 // not off a per-component choice, which is what gave three apps three
1791 // different rings.
1792 let opts = Emit::default();
1793 assert!(focus_rule("field", Depth::Well, &opts).contains("outline-offset: calc(-1 * 2px)"));
1794 assert!(focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
1795 // Nothing to sit inside of, so it sits outside.
1796 assert!(focus_rule("badge", Depth::Sunken, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
1797
1798 // And the ring is not the bevel. Reusing border_width emitted a 1px
1799 // ring that every consumer had already overridden.
1800 assert_ne!(opts.focus_width, opts.border_width);
1801 }
1802
1803 #[test]
1804 fn hover_is_gated_on_capability_and_the_keyboard_path_is_not() {
1805 // goingson's section 60 exists only to take back the hover state this
1806 // crate handed it. Gating at the source is what deletes that section
1807 // in all three apps rather than having each fight for it.
1808 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1809 let condition = format!("@media {}", Density::Pointer.media_condition());
1810 assert!(css.contains(&condition));
1811
1812 // What is gated is every hover state the surfaces carry. The row's
1813 // actions used to be the other half of this test and are not gated any
1814 // more, because they are not hidden any more: a rule that reveals
1815 // nothing needs no capability answer.
1816 let gated: Vec<&str> = css.lines().filter(|line| line.contains(":hover")).collect();
1817 assert!(!gated.is_empty(), "{css}");
1818 for line in gated {
1819 let indent = line.len() - line.trim_start().len();
1820 assert!(indent > 4, "an ungated hover rule: {line}");
1821 }
1822 assert!(!css.contains(".row:hover"), "{css}");
1823 }
1824
1825 #[test]
1826 fn the_capability_answer_is_asked_for_and_not_assumed() {
1827 // Both halves come from the crates that own them. If `makeover-touch`
1828 // ever says a fingertip has hover, this stops gating on its own.
1829 assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact));
1830 assert!(Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Pointer, SizeClass::Compact));
1831 assert_eq!(hover_condition(), Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition()));
1832
1833 // And the size class passed to that call is not a claim about width.
1834 assert!(Affordance::Hover.reads_density());
1835 for size in [SizeClass::Compact, SizeClass::Medium, SizeClass::Expanded] {
1836 assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, size));
1837 }
1838 }
1839
1840 #[test]
1841 fn hover_resolves_against_the_token_makeover_already_derives() {
1842 let css = interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1843 assert!(css.contains(".card:hover {"));
1844 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--hover-surface)"));
1845 // Not the app's choice, which was --surface-overlay.
1846 assert!(!css.contains("surface-overlay"));
1847 }
1848
1849 #[test]
1850 fn a_badge_gets_no_edge_and_no_fill() {
1851 // Decision 2, and the one visible redesign in phase A. Token::Badge is
1852 // Flat: an edge on a label says it can be pressed.
1853 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
1854 let badge = css
1855 .lines()
1856 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".badge {"))
1857 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
1858 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
1859 .join("\n");
1860 assert!(!badge.contains("box-shadow"), "badge kept an edge: {badge}");
1861 assert!(!badge.contains("background"), "badge kept a fill: {badge}");
1862 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(false), Depth::Flat);
1863 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(true), Depth::Flat);
1864 }
1865
1866 #[test]
1867 fn a_badge_carries_a_tone_and_neutral_is_the_bare_class() {
1868 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
1869 // Neutral is the absence of a status, not a status named "none".
1870 assert!(css.contains(".badge {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
1871 assert!(!css.contains("data-tone=\"content-muted\""));
1872 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
1873 assert!(
1874 css.contains(&format!(".badge[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
1875 "missing tone {tone}"
1876 );
1877 assert!(css.contains(&format!("color: var(--{tone})")));
1878 }
1879 }
1880
1881 #[test]
1882 fn a_chip_is_raised_and_latches_into_a_well() {
1883 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
1884 assert!(css.contains(".chip {"));
1885 assert!(css.contains(".chip.latched {"));
1886 assert!(css.contains(".chip:active {"));
1887 // The whole difference from a badge: it answers a click.
1888 assert!(Token::Chip { removable: false }.interactive());
1889 assert!(!Token::Badge.interactive());
1890 }
1891
1892 #[test]
1893 fn only_a_tab_comes_forward_when_chosen() {
1894 // The folder semantic. Collapsing the three selectors would lose it.
1895 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
1896 assert!(css.contains(".tab.chosen {"));
1897 assert!(css.contains(".segment.chosen {"));
1898 assert!(css.contains(".toggle.chosen {"));
1899 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.chosen(), Depth::Raised);
1900 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
1901 assert_eq!(Selector::Toggle.chosen(), Depth::Well);
1902
1903 let tab = css
1904 .lines()
1905 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".tab.chosen {"))
1906 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
1907 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
1908 .join("\n");
1909 assert!(
1910 tab.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"),
1911 "tab was held in: {tab}"
1912 );
1913 }
1914
1915 #[test]
1916 fn an_unchosen_tab_recedes_without_looking_picked() {
1917 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
1918 // Recessed by colour and given no edge. An edge would make every option
1919 // look picked; flat would leave the chosen one nothing to come forward
1920 // from, which is the gap makeover-layout 0.3.0 closed.
1921 assert!(
1922 css.contains(".tab {\n background: var(--surface-sunken);\n}"),
1923 "unchosen tab is not recessed: {css}"
1924 );
1925 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.unchosen(), Depth::Sunken);
1926 assert!(css.contains(".tab:hover {"));
1927 }
1928
1929 #[test]
1930 fn a_segment_stands_up_so_the_chosen_one_can_be_held_in() {
1931 // The inverse of the tab, and why the three selectors are not one
1932 // member with a flag.
1933 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
1934 assert!(css.contains(".segment {\n background: var(--surface-raised);"));
1935 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.unchosen(), Depth::Raised);
1936 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
1937 }
1938
1939 #[test]
1940 fn a_rows_actions_are_shown_at_rest() {
1941 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
1942
1943 // The hover reveal is gone, and with it every escape it needed. What
1944 // it hid was hidden from pointer users alone, who are the ones
1945 // scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
1946 assert!(!css.contains("opacity"), "{css}");
1947 assert!(!css.contains("pointer-events"), "{css}");
1948 assert!(!css.contains(":hover"), "{css}");
1949 assert!(!css.contains(":focus-within"), "{css}");
1950
1951 // Nor is it hidden any other way. `display: none` would reflow the row
1952 // and `visibility: hidden` would take the actions out of the focus
1953 // order; the point is that neither is reached for.
1954 assert!(!css.contains("display: none"), "{css}");
1955 assert!(!css.contains("visibility:"), "{css}");
1956 }
1957
1958 #[test]
1959 fn a_figures_tone_lands_on_the_delta_when_there_is_one() {
1960 // 0.13.0. The delta is the part that reads as good or bad; the number
1961 // itself is an ordinary fact. A figure with no delta has nowhere else to
1962 // put the colour, so the value takes it, and `:has` is what lets one
1963 // attribute mean both without the emitter choosing an element.
1964 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1965
1966 assert!(
1967 css.contains(".figure[data-tone=\"success\"] > .figure-change"),
1968 "{css}"
1969 );
1970 assert!(
1971 css.contains(
1972 ".figure[data-tone=\"success\"]:not(:has(> .figure-change)) > .figure-value"
1973 ),
1974 "{css}"
1975 );
1976 // The caption is the noun and never takes the tone.
1977 assert!(
1978 !css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] > .figure-caption"),
1979 "{css}"
1980 );
1981 }
1982
1983 #[test]
1984 fn the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits() {
1985 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
1986 assert!(css.contains(".row-primary {\n color: var(--content);"));
1987 assert!(css.contains(".row-secondary {\n color: var(--content-secondary);"));
1988 assert!(css.contains(".row-meta {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
1989 // Actions carry controls, not text. Pinning the colour it would inherit
1990 // anyway is louder than saying nothing.
1991 assert!(!css.contains(".row-actions {\n color:"));
1992 }
1993
1994 #[test]
1995 fn the_token_strip_takes_no_colour_of_its_own() {
1996 // makeover-layout 0.9.0. A token carries its own tone, so a colour on
1997 // the strip would be a rule fighting the things sitting in it -- the
1998 // same reasoning as actions, reached for a different reason.
1999 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2000 assert!(!css.contains(".row-tokens {\n color:"));
2001 }
2002
2003 #[test]
2004 fn an_unknown_row_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
2005 // What `#[non_exhaustive]` bought and what it cost. `part_class` can no
2006 // longer be exhaustive, so a member added upstream lands as a bare
2007 // class with no rule instead of stopping the build. Asserting the
2008 // fallback exists is what keeps it from being written as `unreachable!`
2009 // by someone who reads the match as closed.
2010 assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Tokens), "row-tokens");
2011 assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Meta), "row-meta");
2012 }
2013
2014 #[test]
2015 fn a_link_takes_the_action_colour_the_theme_actually_defines() {
2016 // `--action-primary` shipped here for months and no theme has ever
2017 // defined it, so every `.link` dropped its colour declaration outright
2018 // and fell back to inherited text. Nothing caught it because the sheet
2019 // is valid CSS either way; MNW's no-undefined-token lint is what found
2020 // it, 2026-08-14. The hover arm two lines below was always `--action-hover`,
2021 // which is what makes the typo legible in hindsight.
2022 let css = link_rules(&Emit::default());
2023 assert!(css.contains("color: var(--action);"));
2024 assert!(!css.contains("--action-primary"));
2025 assert!(css.contains("color: var(--action-hover);"));
2026 }
2027
2028 #[test]
2029 fn the_progress_trough_is_a_well() {
2030 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
2031 assert!(css.contains(".progress {"));
2032 assert!(css.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
2033 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {"));
2034 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--action)"));
2035 // A bare `.fill` would catch things that have nothing to do with
2036 // progress once the sheet lands unprefixed.
2037 assert!(!css.contains("> .fill "));
2038 }
2039
2040 #[test]
2041 fn a_progress_bar_can_carry_a_tone_and_defaults_to_action() {
2042 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
2043 // Untoned is --action, not Tone::Neutral's content-muted: a bar with no
2044 // status is still reporting progress, and muted would read as disabled.
2045 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {\n background: var(--action);"));
2046 assert!(!css.contains("progress-fill {\n color: var(--content-muted)"));
2047 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
2048 assert!(
2049 css.contains(&format!(".progress > .progress-fill[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
2050 "missing progress tone {tone}"
2051 );
2052 }
2053 // goingson's two live cases, which is why the tones are emitted at all.
2054 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] {\n background: var(--success);"));
2055 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n background: var(--danger);"));
2056 }
2057
2058 #[test]
2059 fn no_scrollbar_track_is_emitted() {
2060 // Decision 3's negative half. It was on the phase A list and came off;
2061 // this is what stops it drifting back in.
2062 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2063 assert!(!css.contains("scrollbar"));
2064 assert!(!css.contains("::-webkit"));
2065 }
2066
2067 #[test]
2068 fn an_invalid_field_is_ringed_without_being_lit() {
2069 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2070 assert!(css.contains(".field {"));
2071 // The ARIA attribute, not a class: one fact, read by both the visual
2072 // and the accessible state, so they cannot drift.
2073 assert!(css.contains(".field[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {"));
2074 assert!(!css.contains(".field.invalid"));
2075 // A flat ring: this edge says "wrong", and a two-tone bevel would have
2076 // it say "raised" at the same time.
2077 assert!(css.contains("0 0 0 1px var(--danger)"));
2078 }
2079
2080 #[test]
2081 fn an_invalid_field_keeps_the_well_underneath_it() {
2082 // box-shadow is not additive. A lone ring replaces the bevel and drops
2083 // the well out from under the field, which is what this emitted before
2084 // 0.5.0 and is the whole reason the rule composes.
2085 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2086 let invalid = css
2087 .lines()
2088 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".field[aria-invalid"))
2089 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2090 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2091 .join("\n");
2092 assert!(
2093 invalid.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"),
2094 "the well was dropped: {invalid}"
2095 );
2096 assert!(invalid.contains("var(--danger)"));
2097 }
2098
2099 #[test]
2100 fn button_and_card_come_out_identical_by_construction() {
2101 // The duplication phase A deletes. They are the same composition, so
2102 // the only honest way to emit both is from one call.
2103 let opts = Emit::default();
2104 let css = surface_rules(&opts);
2105 assert_eq!(
2106 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised),
2107 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised)
2108 );
2109 assert!(css.contains(".button {"));
2110 assert!(css.contains(".card {"));
2111 assert_eq!(
2112 interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default()).replace("button", "card"),
2113 interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default())
2114 );
2115 }
2116
2117 #[test]
2118 fn a_prefix_reaches_the_component_classes_too() {
2119 let opts = Emit {
2120 class_prefix: "mo-",
2121 ..Emit::default()
2122 };
2123 let css = stylesheet(&opts);
2124 for name in [
2125 "mo-button",
2126 "mo-card",
2127 "mo-field",
2128 "mo-badge",
2129 "mo-chip",
2130 "mo-tab",
2131 "mo-row-primary",
2132 "mo-progress",
2133 "mo-progress-fill",
2134 ] {
2135 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}")), "unprefixed: {name}");
2136 }
2137 // The bare names must be gone entirely, or a prefixed build still
2138 // collides with the app's own stylesheet.
2139 assert!(!css.contains(".button {"));
2140 assert!(!css.contains(".card {"));
2141 assert!(!css.contains(".badge {"));
2142 }
2143
2144 #[test]
2145 fn the_class_a_renderer_puts_on_an_option_is_the_one_the_rules_key_off() {
2146 // `option_class` is the contract a screen renderer writes markup
2147 // against, and the rules below are the other half of it. They come off
2148 // one mapping now, so this asserts the mapping is the one that reaches
2149 // the stylesheet rather than that two lists still agree.
2150 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2151 for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
2152 let name = option_class(selector);
2153 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name} {{")), "{name}: {css}");
2154 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}.chosen {{")), "{name}: {css}");
2155 }
2156 assert_eq!(option_class(Selector::Tabs), "tab");
2157 }
2158
2159 #[test]
2160 fn the_caret_brings_its_own_gap_and_is_the_glyph_the_description_names() {
2161 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2162
2163 // The space is inside the glyph, which is what the other two renderers
2164 // write. Emitted bare, every consumer has to add it back, and the
2165 // obvious way to add it -- `content` in an app stylesheet, which is
2166 // unlayered and so outranks this sheet -- deletes the caret instead.
2167 assert!(css.contains("content: \" \\25B2\";"), "{css}");
2168 assert!(css.contains("content: \" \\25BC\";"), "{css}");
2169 assert!(!css.contains("content: \"\\2"), "{css}");
2170
2171 // The arrows this renderer used to draw alone are gone. Composition
2172 // rather than agreement: the glyph comes from `Sort::glyph`, so a
2173 // fourth spelling cannot appear here without appearing everywhere.
2174 assert!(!css.contains("2191") && !css.contains("2193"), "{css}");
2175 assert!(css.contains(&css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())), "{css}");
2176
2177 // Three states, three tones. An idle sortable heading draws its caret
2178 // now rather than reserving a hidden box for it, so there is no
2179 // visibility to order and no reflow left to guard against; what
2180 // separates the states is the colour, and the sorted arms come after
2181 // the idle one because the specificity is the same.
2182 let idle = css
2183 .find(".table-heading[data-sortable]::after")
2184 .expect("the idle caret is emitted");
2185 let sorted = css
2186 .find(".table-heading[aria-sort=\"ascending\"]::after")
2187 .expect("the ascending caret is emitted");
2188 assert!(idle < sorted, "{css}");
2189 assert!(
2190 css[idle..sorted].contains("color: var(--content-secondary);"),
2191 "{css}"
2192 );
2193 assert!(css[sorted..].contains("color: var(--content);"), "{css}");
2194 assert!(!css.contains("visibility: hidden;"), "{css}");
2195 }
2196
2197 #[test]
2198 fn a_destructive_button_has_somewhere_for_its_tone_to_land() {
2199 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2200
2201 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
2202 assert!(
2203 css.contains(&format!(".button[data-tone=\"{}\"]", tone.token())),
2204 "{css}"
2205 );
2206 }
2207 // Colour, not a fill. A red surface is an app's decision about emphasis.
2208 assert!(!css.contains(".button[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n background"));
2209 }
2210
2211 #[test]
2212 fn a_described_list_is_not_a_bulleted_list() {
2213 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2214 assert!(css.contains(".list {\n list-style: none;"), "{css}");
2215 }
2216
2217 #[test]
2218 fn a_table_lays_itself_out_without_being_told_its_columns() {
2219 // The whole point of the CSS table. A described table's columns are
2220 // known at render time, so anything the stylesheet has to be told about
2221 // them would have to travel with the markup.
2222 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2223
2224 assert!(css.contains(".table {\n display: table;"), "{css}");
2225 assert!(css.contains("display: table-row;"), "{css}");
2226 assert!(css.contains("display: table-cell;"), "{css}");
2227 assert!(!css.contains("grid-template-columns"), "{css}");
2228 }
2229
2230 #[test]
2231 fn a_control_in_a_cell_is_not_painted_as_text() {
2232 // The point of makeover-layout 0.14.0's CellPart, and the table-side
2233 // twin of `the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits`
2234 // above. One `.cell` and one content colour meant a button in a cell
2235 // inherited it.
2236 let css = table_rules(&Emit::default());
2237
2238 assert!(
2239 css.contains(".cell-value {\n color: var(--content);"),
2240 "{css}"
2241 );
2242 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-actions {\n color:"), "{css}");
2243 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-tokens {\n color:"), "{css}");
2244 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-link {\n color:"), "{css}");
2245
2246 // The colour is on the part that is text, never on the container. On
2247 // `.cell` it would cascade into the three parts that are not text,
2248 // which is the bug written as one rule.
2249 assert!(!css.contains(".cell {\n color:"), "{css}");
2250 }
2251
2252 #[test]
2253 fn an_unknown_cell_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
2254 // `part_class`'s obligation, taken on for the table side too. CellPart
2255 // is `#[non_exhaustive]`, so a member added upstream must land as a
2256 // bare class rather than as a build that stops.
2257 assert_eq!(cell_part_class(CellPart::Value), "cell-value");
2258 assert_eq!(cell_part_class(CellPart::Actions), "cell-actions");
2259 }
2260
2261 #[test]
2262 fn a_column_drops_by_its_priority_and_never_by_its_position() {
2263 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2264
2265 // Optional goes at the narrowest class and secondary goes with it,
2266 // which is `kept_at`'s cutoff walk said as two queries.
2267 let compact = css
2268 .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Compact.media_condition()))
2269 .expect("a compact query");
2270 let medium = css
2271 .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Medium.media_condition()))
2272 .expect("a medium query");
2273 assert!(css[compact..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
2274 assert!(!css[medium..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
2275
2276 // Essential columns are never mentioned, because not being mentioned is
2277 // already what never dropping means.
2278 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-keeps"), "{css}");
2279
2280 // And nothing counts. `nth-child` is the bug the priority vocabulary
2281 // exists to end.
2282 assert!(!css.contains("nth-child"), "{css}");
2283 }
2284
2285 #[test]
2286 fn a_track_places_by_custom_property_and_never_by_a_size() {
2287 let css = track_rules(&Emit::default());
2288
2289 // Placement arrives from the caller, computed once by Track::fraction.
2290 // If either of these becomes a literal, three renderers have started
2291 // disagreeing about where 09:30 is.
2292 assert!(css.contains("top: var(--track-at"), "{css}");
2293 assert!(css.contains("height: var(--track-for"), "{css}");
2294
2295 // Overlap lanes default so an entry naming neither is full width.
2296 assert!(css.contains("--track-lane, 0"), "{css}");
2297 assert!(css.contains("--track-lanes, 1"), "{css}");
2298
2299 // The refusal that matters. A slot height here would be this crate
2300 // deciding how tall a quarter of an hour is, which is the thing
2301 // makeover-geometry owns and the reason `.track` gets no height at all.
2302 assert!(!css.contains("height: var(--track-slot"), "{css}");
2303 for size in ["px", "rem", "em", "vh"] {
2304 let bare = css
2305 .lines()
2306 .filter(|l| !l.contains("var(--"))
2307 .any(|l| l.contains(size));
2308 assert!(!bare, "track_rules named a {size} outside a var(): {css}");
2309 }
2310 }
2311
2312 #[test]
2313 fn the_whole_sheet_still_names_every_colour() {
2314 // The crate's founding property, asserted over the component layer and
2315 // not only the primitives.
2316 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2317 assert!(!css.contains('#'));
2318 assert!(!css.contains("rgb"));
2319 for line in css.lines() {
2320 // Declarations only: a selector or an at-rule can carry a colon of
2321 // its own (`:root`, `:hover`, `@media (hover: hover)`) and declares
2322 // nothing. Keyed on the trailing semicolon rather than on leading
2323 // indentation, which only ever worked as a proxy for nesting depth
2324 // and stopped when the sheet gained a cascade layer around it.
2325 let trimmed = line.trim();
2326 if !trimmed.ends_with(';') {
2327 continue;
2328 }
2329 let Some((_, value)) = trimmed.split_once(": ") else {
2330 continue;
2331 };
2332 if value.contains("var(--") {
2333 continue;
2334 }
2335 // Everything left has to be a keyword, a number or a
2336 // caller-supplied length, never a colour.
2337 //
2338 // The length arm is what the comment above always claimed and the
2339 // list never covered: `border_width` arrives from `Emit` and lands
2340 // bare in the focus ring's offset, where the bevel had only ever
2341 // used it inside an `inset` shadow.
2342 let opts = Emit::default();
2343 assert!(
2344 value.contains("inset")
2345 || value.contains(opts.border_width)
2346 || value.contains(opts.focus_width)
2347 // 0.12.0's two: a sortable header is a control and says so
2348 // with the pointer, and the caret is this renderer's own
2349 // expression of `aria-sort`. Neither is a colour, which is
2350 // what this test is actually about, and neither is a size,
2351 // which is the other thing this crate must not name. The
2352 // leading space inside the glyph is the same thing the other
2353 // two renderers write into theirs, so it is part of the
2354 // caret rather than spacing this crate decided on.
2355 || value
2356 .trim_start_matches('"')
2357 .trim_start()
2358 .starts_with("\\2")
2359 || matches!(
2360 value.trim_end_matches(';'),
2361 "0" | "1"
2362 | "none"
2363 | "auto"
2364 | "not-allowed"
2365 | "pointer"
2366 // The caret's reserved box. Visibility is presence,
2367 // not magnitude and not colour.
2368 | "hidden"
2369 | "visible"
2370 // The link's two signals. `underline` is a line and
2371 // `inherit` defers to whatever the app set, so
2372 // neither names a colour or a magnitude.
2373 | "underline"
2374 | "inherit"
2375 // The table frame. `display` is structure and not a
2376 // size; `nowrap` is what makes a content column
2377 // content. The two widths are the awkward pair and
2378 // they are still not sizes: `100%` is "all of
2379 // whatever you were given" and `1%` is the CSS
2380 // table idiom for "shrink to fit", which is a
2381 // behaviour spelled as a number because CSS has no
2382 // keyword for it. Neither names a magnitude, which
2383 // is the thing this crate leaves to
2384 // makeover-geometry.
2385 | "table"
2386 | "table-row"
2387 | "table-cell"
2388 | "nowrap"
2389 | "100%"
2390 | "1%"
2391 // The time axis, 0.42.0. `position` is the one
2392 // property whose whole job is where a thing sits,
2393 // which is exactly what this crate spent its life
2394 // refusing to say -- so it is worth being exact
2395 // about why these two are not that refusal
2396 // breaking.
2397 //
2398 // Neither names a magnitude. `relative` says the
2399 // track is what its entries resolve against, and
2400 // `absolute` says an entry is placed rather than
2401 // flowed. *Where* each entry lands is
2402 // `--track-at` and `--track-for`, custom
2403 // properties the caller sets from
2404 // `Track::fraction`, and they are skipped by the
2405 // `var(--` arm above like every other value this
2406 // crate refuses to decide.
2407 //
2408 // The rule that would break the refusal is a slot
2409 // height, and there is none: the track's height is
2410 // the app's, so the percentages have something to
2411 // resolve against and this crate still never says
2412 // how tall a day is.
2413 | "relative"
2414 | "absolute"
2415 // A picture's three, 0.36.0. `block` is structure
2416 // for the reason `table` is: an inline image sits
2417 // on the baseline and carries a descender's worth
2418 // of space under it, which is a fact about
2419 // replaced elements rather than a size this crate
2420 // chose. `cover` and `contain` are `Fit`'s two
2421 // named members reaching CSS unchanged, which is
2422 // an intent arriving rather than a value being
2423 // picked.
2424 | "block"
2425 | "cover"
2426 | "contain"
2427 ),
2428 "unrecognised literal value: {line}"
2429 );
2430 }
2431 }
2432
2433 #[test]
2434 fn flat_emits_nothing_at_all() {
2435 assert_eq!(depth_class(Depth::Flat, &Emit::default()), None);
2436 assert!(!depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("flat"));
2437 }
2438
2439 #[test]
2440 fn a_prefix_namespaces_every_class() {
2441 let opts = Emit {
2442 class_prefix: "mo-",
2443 ..Emit::default()
2444 };
2445 let css = depth_rules(&opts);
2446 assert!(css.contains(".mo-raised {"));
2447 assert!(css.contains(".mo-well {"));
2448 assert!(!css.contains(".raised {"));
2449 }
2450
2451 #[test]
2452 fn the_border_width_is_the_callers() {
2453 let opts = Emit {
2454 border_width: "2px",
2455 ..Emit::default()
2456 };
2457 assert!(bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts).contains("inset 2px 2px 0"));
2458 }
2459
2460 #[test]
2461 fn edges_agree_with_the_description() {
2462 // Not a tautology: it is the guard that a CSS-shaped convenience never
2463 // quietly reverses which side is lit.
2464 let (tl, br) = Bevel::Raised.edges();
2465 assert_eq!(tl.token(), Edge::Light.token());
2466 assert_eq!(br.token(), Edge::Dark.token());
2467 }
2468}