Expand description
Trend tests and the power-law fit for the event times of a point process.
The data is one sequence of event times 0 < t₁ ≤ t₂ ≤ … ≤ tₙ observed on
a single unit — the failures of one repairable system, the incidents of
one service — and the question is whether events arrive at a constant
rate (a homogeneous Poisson process, HPP) or a changing one. That is a
different question from mann_kendall_test
(a trend in an ordered series of values) and from
weibull fitting (independent lifetimes of many units,
which assumes exactly the absence of trend these tests check for).
§Observation
Truncation::Time(T): the unit was watched until T ≥ tₙ, whatever
happened. Truncation::Failure: watching stopped at the last event, so
T = tₙ and that event carries no information about the trend — the
statistics use the n − 1 events before it.
§Methods
With m the number of events used (n time-truncated, n − 1
failure-truncated) and T the end of observation:
- Laplace test —
U = (Σtᵢ/m − T/2) / (T·√(1/(12m))), approximately standard normal under an HPP.U > 0: events crowd towards the end (rate increasing). - MIL-HDBK-189 test —
χ² = 2·Σ ln(T/tᵢ), exactly χ² with2mdegrees of freedom under an HPP. A small value means events crowd towards the end (rate increasing). - Power-law process (Crow-AMSAA) — intensity
λβt^(β−1), expected eventsλt^β. MLEβ̂ = n / Σ ln(T/tᵢ)(the same sum as the MIL-HDBK-189 statistic, over the same events),λ̂ = n / T^β̂.β̂is biased upward; conditionally onn,2nβ/β̂ ~ χ²(2m), soE[β̂] = nβ/(m − 1)andβ̄ = (m − 1)/n · β̂is unbiased —(n − 1)/ntime-truncated,(n − 2)/nfailure-truncated.β < 1: rate decreasing;β > 1: increasing.
§References
- Ascher & Feingold (1984), Repairable Systems Reliability, ch. 5.
- Crow (1974), “Reliability analysis for complex, repairable systems”, in Reliability and Biometry, SIAM, 379–410.
- MIL-HDBK-189C (2011), Reliability Growth Management, §5.
- IEC 61710 (2013), Power law model — Goodness-of-fit tests and estimation methods.
- Rausand & Høyland (2004), System Reliability Theory, 2nd ed., §7.4.
Structs§
- Power
LawFit - A power-law process fit.
- Trend
Test Result - A trend test’s outcome.
Enums§
- Point
Process Error - Why event times were refused.
- Trend
Direction - Which way the observed rate moves — the sign of the deviation from a
constant rate, not a significance verdict (see
p_value). - Truncation
- How observation of the unit ended.
Functions§
- laplace_
trend_ test - Laplace trend test against a constant event rate.
- mil_
hdbk_ 189_ test - MIL-HDBK-189 test against a constant event rate.
- power_
law_ process_ fit - Maximum-likelihood fit of a power-law process (Crow-AMSAA).