Skip to main content

makeover_webview/
lib.rs

1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet
19//!
20//! The stylesheet half needs no markup of the app's to change: an app that
21//! writes its own markup keeps every line of it and gains the classes, which is
22//! why adopting the generated stylesheet is not a migration.
23//!
24//! Adoption is not a deletion either. A rule loses its depth declarations and
25//! gains a variant selector next to it, so an app's file stays about the same
26//! size. What moves is where depth is defined, not how much CSS exists.
27//!
28//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
29//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
30//!
31//! Some of what phase A emits is not a look but the withdrawal of one. A
32//! renderer that picks its element from the description inherits that element's
33//! user-agent chrome, and [`reset`] is where a primitive says which parts of it
34//! were never asked for.
35//!
36//! # Phase B: the markup's names, and the hosts' markup
37//!
38//! The vocabulary's members (fields, choices, columns, figures, meters, charts,
39//! acts and the rest) are drawn by the quasi hosts: `quasi-webview` for this
40//! renderer. What phase B keeps here is everything those hosts and the
41//! hand-written apps have to agree with this crate about:
42//!
43//! - [`form`]: the one escaper, [`form::Markup`] and [`form::Filling`], the
44//!   field classes and the rules behind them. One function covers element text
45//!   and attribute values, where the apps needed four and had to choose
46//!   correctly at every call site.
47//! - [`list`]: column names as classes, the kind, part and flow classes, the
48//!   cell wrapper and sizer, and the `short-N` ladder a table narrows by.
49//! - [`chart`], [`figure`], [`meter`]: class lists and rules only.
50//! - [`facet`] renders `makeover_layout::Facet` itself: a dimension a set is
51//!   narrowed by, and the one phase-B emitter whose markup an app is not
52//!   keeping, because the markup it replaces was two mechanisms rather than
53//!   one. A tag's selection and a tag's browse position were separate state on
54//!   MNW's discover page, which is why every filter row there carries a tick
55//!   box *and* a chevron; one gesture doing both is what lets the second one go.
56//! - [`placeholder`] draws the stand-in a region shows while it has nothing.
57//!
58//! Every class a host's markup can carry is in one of the modules' class lists,
59//! and [`vocabulary::names`] is their union with the generated sheet.
60//!
61//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
62//!
63//! Measured against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a component
64//! list: `.btn`, `.card` and `.tag, .badge` each hand-write the same
65//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
66//!
67//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
68//! not be described as a pure deletion:
69//!
70//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
71//!   [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
72//!   will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
73//!   and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
74//!   where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
75//!   hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
76//!   that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
77//!   answer is there and not here.
78//! - **Badges go flat.** See `token_rules`.
79//!
80//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
81//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
82//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
83//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
84//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
85//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
86//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
87//!
88//! # Interaction states
89//!
90//! [`interactive_rules`] emits four states, in emission order, and the order is
91//! load-bearing: they are all specificity (0,2,0), so disabled beats hover by
92//! coming last and by nothing else. Nothing here reaches for `:not(:disabled)`,
93//! which would raise a selector this crate wraps in its own layer.
94//!
95//! Emitting the states here is what keeps an app from completing the primitive
96//! from outside, by out-specifying a rule it does not own. Those overrides are
97//! also what breaks under cascade layers: an app that declares `@layer` puts
98//! its own rules in a named layer, and unlayered declarations outrank every
99//! named layer regardless of specificity.
100//!
101//! Hover sits inside a capability query. `makeover-layout`'s `Affordance`
102//! answers whether a fingertip has hover and `makeover-geometry` spells the condition; this crate
103//! asks and does not decide, so no app has to take the hover state back on
104//! touch.
105//!
106//! # The layer contract
107//!
108//! [`stylesheet`] emits into the `makeover` cascade layer ([`CSS_LAYER`], which
109//! lives in `makeover-geometry` because that is the one crate every CSS emitter
110//! in the family already depends on). `makeover-geometry` does the same for
111//! `geometry.css`.
112//!
113//! The cascade resolves origin and importance, then layer, then specificity,
114//! then source order, and **unlayered normal declarations outrank every named
115//! layer**. An unlayered generated file therefore beats every rule an app owns,
116//! regardless of specificity and regardless of loading last. Nothing errors when
117//! that happens: the CSS is valid, the minifier is happy, and buttons and badges
118//! look subtly wrong. The layer belongs here rather than in each app, because an
119//! app cannot fix it from its own stylesheet: the fix is to layer the file it
120//! does not own.
121//!
122//! An app should declare the order once, or the layer's position is decided by
123//! whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:
124//!
125//! ```css
126//! @layer makeover, base, components, responsive;
127//! ```
128//!
129//! [`in_css_layer`] is re-exported for an app that assembles its own stylesheet
130//! from this crate's pieces: rules an app generates from them are as generated
131//! as the ones here, so they belong in the same layer and this crate cannot put
132//! them there on the app's behalf.
133//!
134//! # Form rules
135//!
136//! The field markup is the hosts', and the look is this crate's, because a
137//! renderer inventing how a label or an error reads is the drift the
138//! vocabulary check exists to catch. A few rules spend a mark the markup
139//! carries rather than a class:
140//!
141//! - A markdown field is marked `data-format="markdown"`, and
142//!   `form::editor_rules` spends that mark. The Write/Preview pair is a
143//!   segmented control, so it takes the depth, the focus ring and the chosen
144//!   state from rules that already exist; the preview pane is a well, because
145//!   it stands where the control stood. Both are gated on the attribute rather
146//!   than on a class, which is what the attribute is for. **This crate renders
147//!   no markdown**: the pane is filled by whatever binds the editor, which is
148//!   where the host's sanitiser already is.
149//! - A suggestion's second line, `.form-suggestion-detail`, is drawn in
150//!   `--content-muted` rather than in the disabled token. A detail orients
151//!   rather than refuses, and every other secondary line in this crate reads
152//!   the same way, `.form-option-detail` and `.form-unit` included.
153//! - An unavailable option's reason is `.form-option-reason`, and a group with
154//!   an error carries `has-error` while its message carries `visible`
155//!   ([`form::FIELD_STATE_CLASSES`]).
156//!
157//! # A cell says what it holds
158//!
159//! [`CellPart`] names the four things a cell holds,
160//! and `table_rules` turns them into `.cell-value`, `.cell-tokens`,
161//! `.cell-actions` and `.cell-link`. The value and the link take a colour: a
162//! token carries its own tone and an action is a control rather than text.
163//!
164//! The colour goes on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell`. On the container it
165//! cascades into the parts that are not text, and a control in a cell is painted
166//! as text, which is the drift
167//! [`RowPart::intent`](makeover_layout::RowPart) prevents for list rows.
168//!
169//! A cell's part is a [`CellPart`] and never a [`RowPart`]: the two answer
170//! different questions, and only one of them is about a cell.
171//!
172//! # A table narrows itself
173//!
174//! A table a description produced knows its columns at render time, so no rule
175//! can be written per table: it would have to travel with the markup, as a
176//! `<style>` element that needs `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` or in a head an htmx
177//! fragment swap does not carry. `table_rules` lays every table out as flex
178//! rows instead, each column starting at its declared floor and giving up room
179//! by its [`Priority`](makeover_layout::Priority), so the browser narrows a
180//! table at the width its floors add up to. A host puts the column's classes
181//! on every cell (its name through [`list::push_column_name`], its width and
182//! drop tiers from [`list::CELL_WIDTH_CLASSES`] and [`list::CELL_DROP_CLASSES`],
183//! its kind from [`list::kind_class`]), and every cell's contents go in
184//! [`list::CELL_IN`]. **A header row emitted by a renderer's own code has to do
185//! both too**, or the header and the body disagree about which column just
186//! closed and how wide the rest are.
187//!
188//! `.button` takes the four tones as colour, off `data-tone`, the way the badge
189//! does, so a destructive button has somewhere for its tone to land. A list is
190//! reset rather than left as a bulleted list.
191//!
192//! `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` is not honoured. Hiding a row's actions until
193//! hover hides them from pointer users alone, who are the ones scanning a list
194//! to learn what can be done to a row, and every escape the rule grows
195//! (`focus-within` for the keyboard, a capability gate for a fingertip) is a
196//! report that hiding was wrong for somebody.
197//!
198//! # The depth classes are not controls
199//!
200//! `.raised` is a statement about shape and carries no interactive set, so the
201//! vocabulary has a raised surface that is merely an object. An app that wants
202//! one does not have to take a control class and cancel the control half.
203//!
204//! `.button` is the same depth *and* a control, and takes its states from
205//! `surface_rules`, which is where a state belongs: on the thing that claims
206//! to answer a pointer. `.card` is a raised object, and it answers a pointer
207//! only when the element it is written on is a control, `a`, `button`,
208//! `label`, or anything carrying `data-act`, so one name serves the card
209//! that is read and the card that is pressed.
210//!
211//! # Substitution, three ways
212//!
213//! A theme with no `surface-well` is answered differently by each renderer,
214//! which is why substitution belongs to a renderer and not to the description:
215//!
216//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
217//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
218//!   terminal would quantise the two together.
219//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
220//!   var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
221//!   decides anything.
222
223#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
224
225#[cfg(feature = "build")]
226pub mod build;
227pub mod chart;
228pub mod facet;
229pub mod figure;
230pub mod form;
231pub mod list;
232pub mod meter;
233pub mod placeholder;
234pub mod reset;
235pub mod vocabulary;
236
237mod table;
238use table::table_rules;
239
240use crate::list::{cell_part_class, part_class};
241use crate::reset::{Chrome, Reset};
242use makeover_geometry::{Density, SizeClass};
243// Re-exported rather than redefined. An app assembling its own stylesheet out
244// of this crate's pieces needs the same layer name, and most such apps depend
245// on this crate and not on `makeover-geometry` directly.
246pub use makeover_geometry::{CSS_LAYER, in_css_layer};
247
248/// This crate's version, as the generated stylesheet reports it.
249///
250/// A consumer whose lockfile still pins an old `makeover-webview` gets a
251/// well-formed sheet with components missing and no error anywhere, so the
252/// emitter has to name itself in what it writes. Read by
253/// `build::layout_css` through [`stylesheet`].
254pub const VERSION: &str = env!("CARGO_PKG_VERSION");
255use makeover_layout::{
256    Affordance, Bevel, CellPart, Depth, Fallback, Fill, Flow, Intent, RowPart, Selector, Sort,
257    State, Token, Tone,
258};
259use std::fmt::Write as _;
260
261/// How the emitted CSS and markup are shaped, and the copy they carry.
262///
263/// Built with [`Emit::new`] and its setters. `#[non_exhaustive]`, so a new
264/// knob is not a breaking change for anyone who configures one.
265#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
266#[non_exhaustive]
267pub struct Emit {
268    /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
269    ///
270    /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: this crate names no sizes of its
271    /// own.
272    pub border_width: &'static str,
273    /// Focus ring thickness, as a CSS length.
274    ///
275    /// Separate from [`border_width`](Self::border_width), and never derived
276    /// from it: a bevel and a focus indicator answer different questions, and
277    /// only one of them has to be noticed from across a desk.
278    ///
279    /// The default, 2px, is what every consumer had chosen for its own ring.
280    pub focus_width: &'static str,
281    /// The smallest a pointer target may be drawn, as a CSS length.
282    ///
283    /// A value for [`border_width`](Self::border_width)'s reason: a floor is a
284    /// size, and this crate names no sizes of its own.
285    ///
286    /// The default is WCAG 2.2's target minimum. It is an absolute rather than
287    /// a step off the geometry base, and that is deliberate on two counts: a
288    /// floor that scales with the reader's root size is not a floor, and the
289    /// touch density opens the gaps *between* targets rather than licensing a
290    /// smaller one for a pointer.
291    pub target_min: &'static str,
292    /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
293    pub class_prefix: &'static str,
294    /// What marks a compulsory field, appended to its label.
295    ///
296    /// `makeover-tui`'s `PieceStyle::required_marker` and
297    /// `makeover-immediate`'s `FieldStyle::required_marker`, said here for the
298    /// third renderer, with their default. A knob for their reason: it is the
299    /// one piece of *copy* this crate emits, and copy is not a renderer's
300    /// call.
301
302    ///
303    /// # Why it is hidden from the accessibility tree here and nowhere else
304    ///
305    /// The control already carries `required`, which a screen reader
306    /// announces. A marker read out beside it is the same fact twice, so the
307    /// span is `aria-hidden`. The other two renderers have no such attribute
308    /// to lean on, which is why the marker is part of the label string there
309    /// and an element here.
310    pub required_marker: &'static str,
311    /// The accessible name's lead on a facet value's exclude button, before
312    /// the value's own label: "Exclude Drums". Copy, for
313    /// [`required_marker`](Self::required_marker)'s reason.
314    pub exclude_label: &'static str,
315    /// The markdown editor's two modes, as the segments say them.
316    pub write_label: &'static str,
317    /// See [`write_label`](Self::write_label).
318    pub preview_label: &'static str,
319    /// The accessible names of an interval's two boxes.
320    pub lower_label: &'static str,
321    /// See [`lower_label`](Self::lower_label).
322    pub upper_label: &'static str,
323}
324
325impl Emit {
326    /// The defaults: the measured widths above, no prefix, and English copy.
327    #[must_use]
328    pub const fn new() -> Self {
329        Self {
330            border_width: "1px",
331            focus_width: "2px",
332            target_min: "24px",
333            class_prefix: "",
334            required_marker: "*",
335            exclude_label: "Exclude",
336            write_label: "Write",
337            preview_label: "Preview",
338            lower_label: "lower",
339            upper_label: "upper",
340        }
341    }
342}
343
344/// One setter per field, named after it, for building an [`Emit`] outside this
345/// crate: `Emit::new().class_prefix("mk-")`.
346macro_rules! setters {
347    ($($field:ident),* $(,)?) => {
348        impl Emit {
349            $(
350                #[doc = concat!("Set [`", stringify!($field), "`](Self::", stringify!($field), ").")]
351                #[must_use]
352                pub const fn $field(mut self, value: &'static str) -> Self {
353                    self.$field = value;
354                    self
355                }
356            )*
357        }
358    };
359}
360
361setters!(
362    border_width,
363    focus_width,
364    target_min,
365    class_prefix,
366    required_marker,
367    exclude_label,
368    write_label,
369    preview_label,
370    lower_label,
371    upper_label,
372);
373
374impl Default for Emit {
375    fn default() -> Self {
376        Self::new()
377    }
378}
379
380/// A string as CSS escapes, for a `content` value.
381///
382/// `\u{25B2}` becomes `\25B2`. Emitted escaped rather than literally so the
383/// stylesheet is ASCII whatever the description spells: a `content` string is
384/// read by whatever encoding the consumer serves the file as, and a caret that
385/// depends on that is a caret that works on one machine.
386///
387/// Terminated by the closing quote at every site here. A CSS hex escape takes
388/// up to six digits and ends at the first character that cannot be one, so an
389/// escape followed by more text would need a space that these do not.
390fn css_escape(text: &str) -> String {
391    text.chars().fold(String::new(), |mut out, c| {
392        let _ = write!(out, "\\{:X}", c as u32);
393        out
394    })
395}
396
397/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
398#[must_use]
399pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
400    match bevel {
401        Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
402        Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
403        Bevel::RaisedOpen => "--bevel-raised-open",
404        // An edge added to the description since this renderer was last
405        // built. The raised edge rather than no edge: a control with no
406        // box-shadow reads as flat, which is a different claim, where a
407        // closed edge is at worst the same shape drawn one run too many.
408        _ => "--bevel-raised",
409    }
410}
411
412/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
413/// the intent may be absent.
414///
415/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
416/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
417#[must_use]
418pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
419    match fill {
420        Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
421        other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
422    }
423}
424
425/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
426///
427/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
428/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
429/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
430/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
431#[must_use]
432pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
433    let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
434    let w = opts.border_width;
435    // The shaded run's vertical offset is what puts it on the bottom edge. At
436    // zero it lands on the right edge alone, which is the open bevel: three
437    // sides drawn and the fourth left for the surface below to continue
438    // through. Same two shadows either way, so nothing downstream has to know
439    // which it got.
440    // The sign belongs to the value rather than to the template: writing
441    // `-{down}` against a zero emits `-0`, which is a length no stylesheet
442    // should carry even where a parser accepts it.
443    let down = if bevel.draws_bottom() {
444        format!("-{w}")
445    } else {
446        "0".to_string()
447    };
448    format!(
449        "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} {down} 0 var(--{})",
450        top_left.token(),
451        bottom_right.token()
452    )
453}
454
455/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
456///
457/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
458/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
459/// without the fill reads the property directly.
460#[must_use]
461pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
462    let mut css = String::new();
463    for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset, Bevel::RaisedOpen] {
464        let _ = writeln!(
465            css,
466            "    {}: {};",
467            bevel_var(bevel),
468            bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
469        );
470    }
471    css.push_str(ELEVATION_PROPERTY);
472    css
473}
474
475/// The cast shadow of a surface that floats over the page.
476///
477/// Composed here for the reason the bevel pair is: `makeover` derives the tone,
478/// this crate owns the geometry, and neither has to know the other's numbers.
479///
480/// **Only for a surface that overlays the page.** A menu, a toast, a popover, a
481/// dropdown. A surface *in* the page takes `.raised` and its bevel, and a rule
482/// that reaches for this on a card or a plate has renamed a literal rather than
483/// replaced it.
484///
485/// Two lengths rather than one, because a single blur reads as a smudge at
486/// plate size and as a halo at menu size. The offset is small and downward: a
487/// Platinum-era menu sits just off the page rather than hovering above it.
488const ELEVATION_PROPERTY: &str =
489    "    --elevation-overlay: 0 2px 4px var(--elevation), 0 8px 24px var(--elevation);\n";
490
491/// The class name for a depth.
492#[must_use]
493pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
494    let name = match depth {
495        Depth::Flat => return None,
496        Depth::Raised => "raised",
497        Depth::Well => "well",
498        Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
499        // A depth added to the description since this renderer was last
500        // built. No class, on the same footing as Flat: emitting a name
501        // whose rule body we cannot write would put a class in the markup
502        // that the stylesheet never defines.
503        _ => return None,
504    };
505    Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
506}
507
508/// A prefixed class name.
509///
510/// Public, for the renderers that emit markup this crate does not. A screen
511/// renderer writing `class="row"` has to prefix it the way the stylesheet half
512/// does, or a prefixed app gets rules matching everything except the elements
513/// that renderer wrote, and the failure is invisible: the CSS stays valid and
514/// one element is unstyled. Call this rather than copying it.
515#[must_use]
516pub fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
517    let mut out = String::with_capacity(opts.class_prefix.len() + name.len());
518    push_class(&mut out, name, opts);
519    out
520}
521
522/// A prefixed class name, written into a buffer the caller already has.
523///
524/// The form the emitters use, and the reason it exists is [`escape_into`]'s:
525/// putting every class on every element through a `format!` allocates even in
526/// the default case, where the prefix is empty and the answer is the argument.
527/// A described table row carries roughly eighty transient allocations that way,
528/// and this and the escaper are most of them.
529///
530/// [`class`] stays for callers holding a name rather than a buffer.
531///
532/// [`escape_into`]: crate::form::escape_into
533pub fn push_class(out: &mut String, name: &str, opts: &Emit) {
534    out.push_str(opts.class_prefix);
535    out.push_str(name);
536}
537
538/// The attribute an element's custom properties ride in, instead of `style`.
539///
540/// A number this crate hands the stylesheet, a bar's value and its axis, a
541/// facet's depth, a meter's fill, is a custom property the rules divide or
542/// multiply. A `style-src` without `'unsafe-inline'` refuses every style
543/// attribute, so a page under that policy would draw every chart flat from
544/// `style="--value: 4210"`. The same text in this
545/// attribute is data a policy does not police, and the host's script sets each
546/// property through the CSSOM, which the policy allows: [`VARS_JS`].
547///
548/// The value is `--name: value` pairs separated by `;`, the declaration syntax
549/// the `style` attribute already had, so the numbers still reach the markup as
550/// themselves. That is the property the residual seam needs: see the
551/// [`chart`] module header.
552///
553/// Only custom properties. A script that applied any declaration from markup
554/// would hand the policy's refusal straight back.
555pub const VARS_ATTR: &str = "data-vars";
556
557/// The script that applies [`VARS_ATTR`], for a host to serve beside its other
558/// assets.
559///
560/// Without it every number the rules read from that attribute is missing: bars
561/// and charts flat, tree rows unindented, a split screen at even halves. Serve
562/// it as a classic script in the head, not deferred, so its observer is
563/// running before the parser reaches the body and the first paint already has
564/// every property.
565///
566/// ```no_run
567/// # fn main() -> std::io::Result<()> {
568/// std::fs::write("static/vars.js", makeover_webview::VARS_JS)?;
569/// # Ok(())
570/// # }
571/// ```
572pub const VARS_JS: &str = include_str!("vars.js");
573
574/// The class an option of a selector carries, which is what the rules key off.
575///
576/// Named for the option and not for the group: `selector_rules` styles the
577/// thing that gets picked, so `Selector::Tabs` is `tab` and not `tabs`. The
578/// distinction is not pedantry. quasi-webview spelled these `tabs`, `segmented`
579/// and `option`, put `toggle` on the wrapping element rather than on the
580/// buttons inside it, and every described selector in that renderer came out
581/// with no depth, no focus ring and no chosen state, while the toggle group got
582/// a bevel meant for its buttons.
583///
584/// The chosen option additionally carries `chosen`, the same way a latched chip
585/// carries `latched`. That name is this crate's too; there is no reason for a
586/// caller to spell it, and `selector_rules` is where it is written down.
587#[must_use]
588pub fn option_class(selector: Selector) -> &'static str {
589    match selector {
590        Selector::Tabs => "tab",
591        Selector::Segmented => "segment",
592        Selector::Toggle => "toggle",
593        // A selector this crate has not learned draws as tabs, the plainest
594        // of the three, rather than as nothing.
595        _ => "tab",
596    }
597}
598
599/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
600///
601/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
602/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
603/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
604/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
605///
606/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
607/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both would silently drop the fill for exactly
608/// that case. Independent does not
609/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
610/// disagree about what the region is.
611#[must_use]
612pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
613    let mut css = String::new();
614    if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
615        let _ = writeln!(css, "    background: {};", fill_var(fill));
616    }
617    if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
618        let _ = writeln!(css, "    box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
619    }
620    css
621}
622
623/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
624/// nothing.
625#[must_use]
626pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
627    let body = depth_declarations(depth);
628    if body.is_empty() {
629        return String::new();
630    }
631    format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
632}
633
634/// The media condition a hover rule has to sit inside, or `None` if hover is
635/// unconditional.
636///
637/// Two crates answer this and neither answer is made here. `makeover-layout`'s
638/// [`Affordance`] owns *whether* hover exists at a density, and `makeover-geometry` owns how
639/// that capability is spelled as a media condition. Asking both is what stops
640/// this renderer minting a third opinion, which is what all three apps did:
641/// goingson sniffed the user agent, Balanced Breakfast used `(hover: none)`
642/// alone, and the MNW server had no gate at all.
643///
644/// [`SizeClass`] is required by [`Affordance::available`] and ignored by this
645/// member, which reports as much through `reads_size`. Passing Compact is not
646/// a claim about width; the test below pins that every class agrees.
647pub(crate) fn hover_condition() -> Option<&'static str> {
648    if Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact) {
649        // A fingertip grew a hover state. Nothing to gate, and this renderer
650        // should not invent a reason to gate anyway.
651        None
652    } else {
653        Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition())
654    }
655}
656
657/// Put a rule inside a media query, or leave it alone.
658pub(crate) fn gated(condition: Option<&str>, rule: &str) -> String {
659    let Some(condition) = condition else {
660        return rule.to_string();
661    };
662    let mut css = format!("@media {condition} {{\n");
663    for line in rule.lines() {
664        // Blank lines stay blank. Indenting one leaves trailing whitespace,
665        // which is the sort of thing a formatter later reverts and calls a diff.
666        if line.is_empty() {
667            css.push('\n');
668        } else {
669            let _ = writeln!(css, "    {line}");
670        }
671    }
672    css.push_str("}\n");
673    css
674}
675
676/// The keyboard focus ring, placed by the depth it lands on.
677///
678/// This is the webview's **focus ring** and nothing more. **Reach** and
679/// **focus** are both the browser's, the document decides what is reachable
680/// and `:focus-visible` decides which reached thing wears the ring, and no
681/// description states either. The three terms are defined once in
682/// `makeover_layout`'s crate header, "Reach, focus and the focus ring".
683///
684/// One ring for the whole system, because a focus ring's job is to be
685/// recognised and three apps having three of them is the failure. What varies
686/// is where it sits, and that comes off [`Depth`] rather than off a per-
687/// component choice: a well takes the ring inside its own edge, and anything
688/// standing proud of the page takes it outside.
689///
690/// `outline` rather than the composed `box-shadow` the invalid-field ring at
691/// `field_rules` uses, and deliberately the one place the two rings are built
692/// differently. A `box-shadow` ring has to restate the bevel beside it, because
693/// `box-shadow` is not additive and a lone ring silently drops the well out
694/// from under the element. That restatement is a second copy of the depth,
695/// living in a different function from the first, and it is exactly the
696/// duplication `Depth` exists to prevent. `outline` occupies its own property,
697/// so the bevel survives untouched and there is nothing to keep in agreement.
698/// They render the same: both are a flush ring one border-width wide.
699#[must_use]
700pub fn focus_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
701    let w = opts.focus_width;
702    // Same magnitude either way, and only the sign comes off the depth. Both
703    // values are what the consumers had already converged on independently:
704    // 2px out is what all three wrote, and 2px in is the MNW server's own
705    // answer for the one inset ring it had.
706    let offset = match depth.bevel() {
707        // Inside the well, clear of its edge rather than painted over it.
708        Some(Bevel::Inset) => format!("calc(-1 * {w})"),
709        // Raised, or no edge at all. Outside, standing off by its own width.
710        _ => w.to_string(),
711    };
712    // The token by name. It is `makeover`'s, derived from the action colour,
713    // and reaching it through a description member was a second path to the
714    // same variable for as long as one existed.
715    format!(
716        ".{selector}:focus-visible {{\n    outline: {w} solid var(--focus-ring);\n    outline-offset: {offset};\n}}\n"
717    )
718}
719
720/// A rest depth said out loud on both axes, for a rule that has to beat the
721/// states above it.
722///
723/// [`depth_declarations`] states an axis only when the depth has something to
724/// say about it, which is right for a rest rule: a [`Depth::Flat`] region
725/// inherits what it sits on, and asserting `background: none` there would be
726/// the difference between level-with and painted-transparent. It is wrong for
727/// a rule whose whole job is to take a state back. An axis left unstated is an
728/// axis the state above keeps, so `Flat` re-asserted nothing at all and a
729/// disabled control kept whatever hover had given it.
730///
731/// So the axes the depth is silent on are withdrawn rather than skipped, and
732/// the withdrawal is spelled by [`reset`] rather than here, so a disabled
733/// control and a flat one say the same words. Reaches further than the fill:
734/// [`Depth::Sunken`] and [`Depth::Overlay`] have no bevel either, and the
735/// pressed rule above hands out an inset one.
736fn rest_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
737    let mut css = String::new();
738    match depth.fill() {
739        Some(fill) => {
740            let _ = writeln!(css, "    background: {};", fill_var(fill));
741        }
742        None => css.push_str(&Reset::NOTHING.and(Chrome::Fill).declarations()),
743    }
744    match depth.bevel() {
745        Some(bevel) => {
746            let _ = writeln!(css, "    box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
747        }
748        None => css.push_str(&Reset::NOTHING.and(Chrome::Shadow).declarations()),
749    }
750    css
751}
752
753/// Present, visible, and not answering.
754///
755/// Matches the ARIA attribute as well as the pseudo-class, because `:disabled`
756/// only matches form elements and half the things this crate emits are not
757/// one: a `div` carrying `.chip` or `.tab` can never be `:disabled`. Keying on
758/// the accessible state is the pattern `field_rules` already establishes for
759/// `aria-invalid`, on the reasoning that one fact read by both the styling and
760/// the accessibility tree cannot drift from itself.
761///
762/// The rest depth is re-asserted rather than assumed, because this rule has to
763/// beat the hover and pressed rules above it. It does that on source order at
764/// equal specificity, not by out-specifying them: every rule this function's
765/// caller emits is (0,2,0), and adding a `:not(:disabled)` anywhere would raise
766/// one of them and have to be unpicked when this output moves inside its own
767/// cascade layer.
768///
769/// Re-asserted on **both** axes, through `rest_declarations`.
770/// `depth_declarations` alone is empty for [`Depth::Flat`], so a flat control
771/// would win the contest with nothing to say and keep the hover surface
772/// underneath a control that had stopped answering.
773#[must_use]
774pub fn disabled_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
775    format!(
776        ".{selector}:disabled,\n.{selector}[aria-disabled=\"true\"] {{\n{}    color: var(--{});\n    cursor: not-allowed;\n}}\n",
777        rest_declarations(depth),
778        State::Disabled.token()
779    )
780}
781
782/// Every state a selector that answers a click implies: hover, pressed, focus
783/// and disabled, in that order.
784///
785/// Order is the whole cascade mechanism here. All four selectors are
786/// specificity (0,2,0), so disabled wins over hover and pressed by coming last
787/// and by nothing else.
788///
789/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
790/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
791/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
792/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
793/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
794/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
795///
796/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
797/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
798/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
799/// consumed until now. What it *is* gated on is capability, via
800/// `hover_condition`. Before that gate existed the apps each wrote their own:
801/// goingson's section 60 exists solely to take back the hover state this
802/// function had just handed it, by out-specifying a rule it does not own.
803///
804/// `depth` is the selector's **rest** depth, used to place the focus ring and
805/// to restore the surface under a disabled control. The pressed rule keeps
806/// inverting from [`Depth::Raised`] regardless: a tab's unchosen depth is
807/// [`Depth::Sunken`], and `Sunken.pressed()` is `Sunken`, so deriving the press
808/// from the rest depth would leave a tab with no press at all.
809#[must_use]
810pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
811    let mut css = gated(
812        hover_condition(),
813        &format!(".{selector}:hover {{\n    background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n"),
814    );
815    css.push_str(&depth_rule(
816        &format!("{selector}:active"),
817        Depth::Raised.pressed(),
818    ));
819    css.push_str(&focus_rule(selector, depth, opts));
820    css.push_str(&disabled_rule(selector, depth));
821    css
822}
823
824/// The compound a card's interactive states are written against: the class
825/// on an element that is itself a control.
826///
827/// `label` for a card wrapping a choice, `[data-act]` for an act a renderer
828/// drew on some other element. Without the class prefix, the way every
829/// selector handed to [`interactive_rules`] is.
830#[must_use]
831pub fn pressable_card(card: &str) -> String {
832    format!("{card}:is(a, button, label, [data-act])")
833}
834
835/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
836///
837/// A depth and nothing else. `.raised` says a surface sits on what is behind
838/// it, which is a statement about the shape and not about what happens when a
839/// pointer arrives, so it emits no hover, press, focus or disabled rule. The
840/// named surfaces are where interaction lives: `.button`, and `.card` written
841/// on a control, get their states from `surface_rules`.
842///
843/// Giving this class the interactive set leaves the vocabulary with no raised
844/// surface that is merely an object, so a consumer that needs one has to take a
845/// control class and cancel half of it.
846#[must_use]
847pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
848    let mut css = String::new();
849    for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
850        let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
851            continue;
852        };
853        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
854    }
855    css
856}
857
858/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
859///
860/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
861/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
862/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
863/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
864/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
865/// drifting apart again.
866///
867/// A card's states hang off [`pressable_card`] rather than the bare class. A
868/// card is a raised object that answers a pointer only when it is written on a
869/// control, which is what lets one name cover both: a store tile that is one
870/// link, a tier picker that is a label round a radio, and a use-case card that
871/// does nothing and so has no hover to cancel.
872fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
873    let mut css = String::new();
874    let button = class("button", opts);
875    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&button, Depth::Raised));
876    css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&button, Depth::Raised, opts));
877
878    let card = class("card", opts);
879    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&card, Depth::Raised));
880    css.push_str(&interactive_rules(
881        &pressable_card(&card),
882        Depth::Raised,
883        opts,
884    ));
885
886    let field = class("field", opts);
887    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
888
889    // A field takes focus and refuses input like everything else here, and got
890    // neither until now, which is why all three apps hand-write a focus ring
891    // for it and no two of them match. No hover or pressed: a text field does
892    // not light up under the pointer and does not invert when clicked, so the
893    // two states `interactive_rules` would add are the two it does not have.
894    css.push_str(&focus_rule(&field, Depth::Well, opts));
895    css.push_str(&disabled_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
896
897    // A file field's own button is a button. `::file-selector-button` is the
898    // one part of an `<input type="file">` a stylesheet reaches, and without a
899    // rule the platform's grey control sits inside a well drawn in the theme's.
900    // Raised, with the hover and the press a button has; no focus ring, because
901    // the focus belongs to the input the pseudo-element is part of, and the
902    // field's own ring already draws it.
903    let chooser = format!("{field}::file-selector-button");
904    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chooser, Depth::Raised));
905    let _ = writeln!(
906        css,
907        ".{chooser} {{\n    border: none;\n    color: inherit;\n    font: inherit;\n    padding: var(--gap-bound) var(--gap-peer);\n    margin-inline-end: var(--gap-peer);\n    cursor: pointer;\n}}"
908    );
909    css.push_str(&gated(
910        hover_condition(),
911        &format!(".{chooser}:hover {{\n    background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n"),
912    ));
913    css.push_str(&depth_rule(
914        &format!("{chooser}:active"),
915        Depth::Raised.pressed(),
916    ));
917
918    // Keyed on the ARIA attribute rather than on a class, so the visual state
919    // and the accessible state cannot drift apart: there is one fact and both
920    // read it. goingson already drove its invalid styling this way and was
921    // right to; the `.invalid` class this emitted before 0.5.0 was a second
922    // place to forget.
923    //
924    // The ring composes *after* the bevel rather than replacing it. box-shadow
925    // is not additive, so a lone ring silently dropped the well out from under
926    // an invalid field. Flat and unlit: this edge is saying "wrong", and
927    // lighting one side would have it say "raised" at the same time.
928    let _ = writeln!(
929        css,
930        ".{field}[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {{\n    box-shadow: var({}), 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
931        bevel_var(Bevel::Inset),
932        opts.border_width
933    );
934
935    // The default-button ring, on the one control that commits
936    // (the act that commits, wiki `explicit-commit-affordance`).
937    // A flush frame twice the border width, composed after the bevel for the
938    // invalid ring's reason, and outside the element, so the focus outline,
939    // which stands off by its own width, lands beside it rather than over it.
940    // Pressed keeps the ring and inverts only the bevel. Disabled drops the
941    // ring and the weight together: the ring says "this is what Return does",
942    // and a control Return cannot reach is not the default. goingson's bulk
943    // bars are the site: Complete and Delete stand disabled until a row is
944    // ticked, and ringed they read as the strongest controls on a page with
945    // nothing selected.
946    //
947    // An attribute rather than a class, for `data-tone`'s reason: it is a fact
948    // about the act, and a renderer writes it beside the tone.
949    let ring = format!("0 0 0 calc(2 * {})", opts.border_width);
950    let _ = writeln!(
951        css,
952        ".{button}[data-commits] {{\n    box-shadow: var({}), {ring} var(--border-strong);\n    font-weight: bold;\n}}",
953        bevel_var(Bevel::Raised)
954    );
955    let _ = writeln!(
956        css,
957        ".{button}[data-commits]:active {{\n    box-shadow: var({}), {ring} var(--border-strong);\n}}",
958        bevel_var(Bevel::Inset)
959    );
960    let _ = writeln!(
961        css,
962        ".{button}[data-commits]:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled=\"true\"]) {{\n    box-shadow: var({});\n    font-weight: inherit;\n}}",
963        bevel_var(Bevel::Raised)
964    );
965
966    // The act the screen is for (the leading act).
967    //
968    // **Leading fills and committing outlines**, which is what lets a control
969    // wear both. The ring above is a frame outside the bevel and this is the
970    // ground inside it, so the two compose rather than compete: a form that is
971    // the screen's own work draws a filled button with the default ring round
972    // it, and a sub-form's Add keeps the ring alone.
973    //
974    // `--content-on-action` rather than a hand-picked ink. The theme derives it
975    // with `readable_on(action)`, so a theme whose action hue is pale gets dark
976    // text without this file knowing which themes those are.
977    //
978    // The bevel stays. A leading control is still a button, and dropping its
979    // raise to signal importance would make the one control a reader most needs
980    // to press the one that least looks pressable.
981    // `:not([data-tone])` is load-bearing, and a render caught it missing.
982    // A toned control already says what pressing it means, and that outranks
983    // how badly the screen wants it pressed, the rule `makeover-tui` states
984    // and this file did not. Without the guard, goingson's compose drew Queue
985    // with the Success tone's pale ground under `--content-on-action`'s near
986    // white ink, which is a label nobody can read.
987    //
988    // The tone keeps the control; `leading` adds nothing to it. That is a
989    // deliberate loss: a screen whose primary act is destructive or toned has
990    // to lead by order and by what the tone already says.
991    let _ = writeln!(
992        css,
993        ".{button}[data-leading]:not([data-tone]) {{\n    background: var(--action);\n    color: var(--content-on-action);\n}}"
994    );
995    // Hover keeps the derived pair, so the fill does not fall back to the
996    // ordinary button's ground mid-hover and leave `--content-on-action`
997    // stranded on a surface it was never measured against.
998    //
999    // Gated through `hover_condition` like every other hover rule here: whether
1000    // a hover state exists at a density is `Affordance`'s to answer, and a
1001    // rule written outside the gate is this renderer inventing a second answer.
1002    // The vocabulary test catches exactly that, and caught this.
1003    css.push_str(&gated(
1004        hover_condition(),
1005        &format!(
1006            ".{button}[data-leading]:not([data-tone]):hover {{\n    background: var(--action-hover);\n    color: var(--content-on-action);\n}}\n"
1007        ),
1008    ));
1009    // Disabled drops to the muted ink on the ordinary button ground: a filled
1010    // control that cannot be pressed still reads as the thing to press, which
1011    // is the one thing the fill must not say when it cannot be pressed.
1012    //
1013    // Through `fill_var` rather than naming the token, so this follows the
1014    // ordinary button if the raised fill is ever re-pointed.
1015    let _ = writeln!(
1016        css,
1017        ".{button}[data-leading]:not([data-tone]):is(:disabled, [aria-disabled=\"true\"]) {{\n    background: {};\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}",
1018        fill_var(Fill::Raised)
1019    );
1020    css
1021}
1022
1023/// Badges and chips.
1024///
1025/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
1026/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
1027/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
1028/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
1029/// decide which of the two it always was.
1030///
1031/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
1032/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
1033/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
1034/// Text that goes somewhere.
1035///
1036/// The one inline control. A table cell carries `cell-link` instead, which
1037/// reads as its row's title rather than as a link; this is the same thing
1038/// outside a table, which is what a described run holds when a sentence
1039/// contains a link.
1040///
1041/// Colour and underline only. Whether a link is inline in a sentence or sitting
1042/// on its own line is the app's layout, and how much room it takes is
1043/// `makeover-geometry`'s. What is here is the pair of signals that say "this
1044/// goes somewhere" and nothing that says where it sits.
1045///
1046/// The visited arm is deliberately absent. A link inside an app points at the
1047/// app's own screens, which the user is expected to have been to, so painting
1048/// them differently marks almost everything and distinguishes nothing.
1049fn link_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1050    let mut css = String::new();
1051    let link = class("link", opts);
1052
1053    let _ = writeln!(
1054        css,
1055        ".{link} {{\n    color: var(--action);\n    \
1056         text-decoration: underline;\n}}"
1057    );
1058    // The pointer-target floor, and the scope is the whole of the design in it.
1059    //
1060    // A bare `.link` is its own line box, 21px at the body size, under the 24
1061    // that `makeover_geometry::TARGET_LEAST` names. Applied to every `.link`
1062    // that floor would reach an anchor set in running prose, where growing the
1063    // box sets the leading of the paragraph around it: the fix would cost more
1064    // than the defect. So it is scoped to a link laid out as a piece rather
1065    // than set in text, which in the emitted markup is one inside a run or a
1066    // cell, a footer strip, a row of places, a table cell.
1067    //
1068    // `min-block-size` rather than padding: padding adds to the line box and
1069    // grows whatever holds the link, where a minimum lets the anchor take room
1070    // its container usually already has. `inline-flex` is what makes the
1071    // minimum apply to an inline element at all, and `align-items: center`
1072    // keeps the text on the box's centre line rather than its top.
1073    let run = class("run", opts);
1074    let cell = class("cell", opts);
1075    let least = makeover_geometry::TARGET_LEAST.token();
1076    let _ = writeln!(
1077        css,
1078        ".{run} .{link},\n.{cell} .{link} {{\n    display: inline-flex;\n    \
1079         align-items: center;\n    min-block-size: var(--{least});\n}}"
1080    );
1081    // The hover step is the same one every other control takes, and it is a
1082    // colour rather than a surface: a link has no box to raise.
1083    css.push_str(&gated(
1084        hover_condition(),
1085        &format!(".{link}:hover {{\n    color: var(--action-hover);\n}}\n"),
1086    ));
1087    // The one ring, placed as on anything standing level with the page.
1088    css.push_str(&focus_rule(&link, Depth::Flat, opts));
1089    // A link is often a `<button>` rather than an `<a>`: a renderer picks the
1090    // element from the method, so a link that writes is a button that has to
1091    // stop looking like one. What that costs is named in [`reset`].
1092    css.push_str(&Reset::TEXT_BUTTON.rule(&format!("button.{link}")));
1093    css
1094}
1095
1096fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1097    let mut css = String::new();
1098
1099    // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
1100    // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
1101    let badge = class("badge", opts);
1102    // `content-muted` literally, not `Tone::Neutral.token()`. What makes a
1103    // badge quiet is `Token::Badge` answering no click, which this crate holds
1104    // and `Tone` genuinely does not know. Routing it through Neutral put the
1105    // claim where the evidence was not, and the bill arrived on the figure
1106    // value: it took the same muting from the same call and read as its own
1107    // caption. Neutral answers `content`.
1108    //
1109    // A badge is a chip, wiki `table-model`: an opaque fill inside an edge, in
1110    // the theme's own ink at normal weight. Coloured text was never ratified
1111    // and measured 1.34:1 on goingson's warning; muted text 2.78:1 on
1112    // solarized-dark. So the ink is `content` and what says which kind of
1113    // token it is moves to the fill and the edge: the table's raised ground for
1114    // a neutral chip, makeover's `*-surface` for a status, edged in its tone.
1115    // Still no bevel: a label with a raised edge says it can be pressed.
1116    let bw = opts.border_width;
1117    let _ = writeln!(
1118        css,
1119        ".{badge} {{\n    display: inline-flex;\n    align-items: center;\n    \
1120         padding: 0 var(--step-snug);\n    border: {bw} solid var(--border);\n    \
1121         border-radius: var(--radius-fine);\n    background: var(--surface-raised);\n    \
1122         color: var(--content);\n    font-weight: normal;\n}}"
1123    );
1124    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1125        let _ = writeln!(
1126            css,
1127            ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    background: var(--{0}-surface);\n    \
1128             border-color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1129            tone.token()
1130        );
1131    }
1132
1133    // A button carries the four tones a badge does. It had none, on the reading
1134    // that a control's colour is its surface rather than its text, and that
1135    // reading has one hole big enough to matter: the button that destroys
1136    // something. Every consumer had written that rule itself, and a description
1137    // that says `Tone::Danger` on an act had nowhere for it to land.
1138    //
1139    // A fill and not the text, matching the badge exactly. Coloured text is
1140    // the shape wiki `table-model` ruled out for status text, and
1141    // `{tone}-surface`'s own derivation comment says why: the tone colours are
1142    // fills, and a fill used as
1143    // ink measures 3.36:1 for danger and 1.84:1 for success on goingson's
1144    // theme. Both are under the 4.5:1 floor, and success is under it by more
1145    // than the floor itself.
1146    //
1147    // It read as ratified for longer than it was because goingson set
1148    // `color` on `.button` in a later layer, so no described tone ever reached
1149    // a button and nobody saw the colour it would have drawn.
1150    //
1151    // The earlier note here said a red surface belongs to an app's own layer.
1152    // That argument was against a *saturated* fill, and it still holds: this is
1153    // the ground with 12 percent of the tone in it, which is the same tint a
1154    // status chip carries and is not something an app would draw over.
1155    //
1156    // The fill and NOT the edge, which is where this differs from the badge.
1157    // A badge's border is makeover's, so the badge tones it. A button's is the
1158    // app's: goingson writes `border: ... solid var(--border)` on `.button` in
1159    // a later layer, and a shorthand cancels a generated `border-color` the
1160    // same way its `color` cancelled the tone for months. goingson's own drift
1161    // check caught it on the first build. An edge an app silently overrides is
1162    // worse than no edge, so the tint carries the tone alone.
1163    let button = class("button", opts);
1164    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1165        let _ = writeln!(
1166            css,
1167            ".{button}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    background: var(--{0}-surface);\n}}",
1168            tone.token()
1169        );
1170        // The pointer answer, at the specificity the tone rule just took. The
1171        // plain `.button:hover` is (0,2,0) and sits earlier in this sheet, so
1172        // without this a toned button is the one control on the screen that
1173        // does not move under a pointer.
1174        //
1175        // The fallback is for the version skew, and it is not decoration: the
1176        // hover tint is a `makeover` 3.8 token and this sheet is emitted from a
1177        // crate an app can upgrade on its own. An unresolved custom property
1178        // makes the whole declaration invalid at computed-value time rather
1179        // than dropping to the cascade, so without it a toned button on an
1180        // older theme would hover to `transparent`.
1181        css.push_str(&gated(
1182            hover_condition(),
1183            &format!(
1184                ".{button}[data-tone=\"{0}\"]:hover {{\n    background: \
1185                 var(--{0}-surface-hover, var(--hover-surface));\n}}\n",
1186                tone.token()
1187            ),
1188        ));
1189    }
1190
1191    // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
1192    // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
1193    // markup and waits for phase B.
1194    let chip = class("chip", opts);
1195    let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
1196
1197    // The pointer floor, and the one number in this file that does not scale.
1198    // A chip drawn from its padding alone came out 23px at every width and
1199    // every density in goingson: 36 of one ui-fuzz run's 51 target findings
1200    // were this single rule. The length arrives from the caller, the way every
1201    // other length in this crate does, see `Emit::target_min` for why the
1202    // floor is an absolute rather than a `--step-*`.
1203    //
1204    // A floor and not a height: a chip with two lines of text or a larger root
1205    // size still grows. `.chip` is already `inline-flex` with its items
1206    // centred, from quasi-webview's box rules, so the extra block size opens
1207    // around the label rather than under it. `.chip.latched` takes it through
1208    // the same class; `.badge` is a separate class and deliberately does not,
1209    // because a badge is a label and never a target.
1210    let _ = writeln!(
1211        css,
1212        ".{chip} {{\n    min-block-size: {};\n}}",
1213        opts.target_min
1214    );
1215
1216    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
1217    css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip, unlatched.depth(false), opts));
1218    css.push_str(&depth_rule(
1219        &format!("{chip}.latched"),
1220        unlatched.depth(true),
1221    ));
1222    css
1223}
1224
1225/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
1226///
1227/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
1228/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
1229/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
1230/// three are not one member with a flag.
1231///
1232/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
1233/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
1234///
1235/// Both states emit. Naming only the chosen option leaves an unchosen one
1236/// falling through to [`Depth::Flat`] with nothing drawn for it, so an app has
1237/// to hand-write the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
1238fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1239    let mut css = String::new();
1240    for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
1241        let c = class(option_class(selector), opts);
1242        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
1243        css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, selector.unchosen(), opts));
1244        if selector.joins_its_pane() {
1245            // Every tab in a folder strip rounds at the top and stays square
1246            // at the bottom, chosen or not: the corners belong to the strip's
1247            // shape rather than to which option is up. On the base class and
1248            // not only on the chosen arm, so that an app has no reason left to
1249            // carry a radius of its own. goingson's unlayered `.tab` rule beat
1250            // a chosen-only version of this outright, an unlayered rule being
1251            // ahead of every layer whatever its specificity.
1252            let _ = writeln!(
1253                css,
1254                ".{c} {{\n    border-radius: var(--radius-control) var(--radius-control) 0 0;\n}}"
1255            );
1256            css.push_str(&joined_rule(&c, selector.chosen(), opts));
1257        } else {
1258            css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
1259        }
1260    }
1261    css
1262}
1263
1264/// The chosen option of a selector that joins what it opens.
1265///
1266/// [`depth_rule`] draws a closed box, which is right for anything standing on
1267/// its own and wrong for a folder tab: a closed bottom run reads as a chip
1268/// resting near its pane rather than as the front of it. Three things make the
1269/// join, and all three are needed, which is why this is one rule rather than a
1270/// property added to the depth:
1271///
1272/// - The depth's own fill, so the tab and the pane are the same surface. Taken
1273///   from [`Depth::fill`] rather than named here, so the pairing rule holds.
1274/// - [`Bevel::RaisedOpen`], so the run between the two is not drawn.
1275/// - A pull down by one border width, so the tab covers the pane's own top
1276///   run where it passes underneath. Without it the pane's lit edge draws
1277///   straight across the join and the tab reads as sitting on a line.
1278///
1279/// The corners round at the top and stay square at the bottom for the same
1280/// reason: a rounded bottom corner puts a notch of page colour either side of
1281/// the join. `makeover-geometry` has no per-corner member and does not need
1282/// one, since which corners round is a consequence of the join rather than a
1283/// scale a consumer picks.
1284fn joined_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
1285    let mut body = String::new();
1286    if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
1287        let _ = writeln!(body, "    background: {};", fill_var(fill));
1288    }
1289    let _ = writeln!(
1290        body,
1291        "    box-shadow: var({});",
1292        bevel_var(Bevel::RaisedOpen)
1293    );
1294    // No radius here. Every tab in a joining strip already rounds at the top
1295    // from the base rule, chosen or not, and repeating it on this arm would be
1296    // a second copy of one decision.
1297    let _ = writeln!(
1298        body,
1299        "    margin-block-end: calc(-1 * {});",
1300        opts.border_width
1301    );
1302    // And it has to paint above what it overlaps. Both the tab and the pane are
1303    // in flow, the pane is the later sibling, so without this the pane draws
1304    // over the run the pull-down just covered and the join is undone by the
1305    // pane's own lit edge. Positioned, not raised by `z-index`: being
1306    // positioned is enough to paint above an unpositioned sibling, and a stack
1307    // index here would be a number this crate has no way to keep true against
1308    // whatever an app stacks around it.
1309    let _ = writeln!(body, "    position: relative;");
1310    let mut css = format!(".{selector}.chosen {{\n{body}}}\n");
1311
1312    // A strip that runs down its pane joins it on the side, and the join above
1313    // is written for a strip that runs across. Which way a strip runs is not
1314    // on [`Selector`], and it should not be: it is the arrangement, and the
1315    // renderer drawing the arrangement is the one that knows.
1316    //
1317    // `aria-orientation` is how that renderer has to say it anyway. It is
1318    // ARIA's word rather than a private attribute, required on any vertical
1319    // tablist for a screen reader, so keying on it couples this to the
1320    // standard and not to one caller's markup. Until the side join is drawn,
1321    // a vertical strip takes the closed edge back and reads as a raised chip
1322    // beside its pane, which is what it drew before this rule existed.
1323    let _ = writeln!(
1324        css,
1325        "[aria-orientation=\"vertical\"] .{selector}.chosen {{\n    \
1326         box-shadow: var({});\n    border-radius: var(--radius-control);\n    \
1327         margin-block-end: 0;\n}}",
1328        bevel_var(Bevel::Raised)
1329    );
1330    css
1331}
1332
1333/// The parts of a list row.
1334///
1335/// The list is written out rather than derived because `RowPart` is
1336/// `#[non_exhaustive]`, so there is nothing to iterate. A member added upstream emits no rule until it is named here, which
1337/// is the trade `non_exhaustive` makes: a silent gap instead of a build break.
1338/// [`part_class`] carries the same list and the same obligation.
1339fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1340    let mut css = String::new();
1341
1342    // The container the rows sit in, giving back what a `<ul>` brought. Not a
1343    // size: there is no magnitude in it, which is the line this crate holds.
1344    css.push_str(&Reset::BULLETS.rule(&format!(".{}", class("list", opts))));
1345
1346    for part in [
1347        RowPart::Primary,
1348        RowPart::Secondary,
1349        RowPart::Meta,
1350        RowPart::Actions,
1351        RowPart::Tokens,
1352        RowPart::Proportion,
1353    ] {
1354        let c = class(part_class(part), opts);
1355
1356        // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
1357        // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
1358        // would be louder than saying nothing. Tokens answer alike, for their
1359        // own reason: each token carries its own tone, and a colour on the
1360        // strip would fight the things sitting in it. A proportion is the same
1361        // case again: the meter inside carries the tone.
1362        if !matches!(
1363            part,
1364            RowPart::Actions | RowPart::Tokens | RowPart::Proportion
1365        ) {
1366            let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n    color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
1367        }
1368
1369        // A row's actions are shown at rest. `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` said
1370        // otherwise and was not honoured here from 0.23.0; makeover-layout
1371        // 0.13.0 retired the method, so there is no longer a description saying
1372        // one thing and a renderer doing another.
1373        //
1374        // The rule was `opacity: 0` gated to pointer devices, revealed on
1375        // `:hover` and on `:focus-within`. Each escape it needed was a report
1376        // that hiding was wrong for somebody: `focus-within` because tabbing
1377        // could never reach an action; the gate because a fingertip had no way
1378        // to unhide, which both webview apps had already hand-written
1379        // `opacity: 1` to undo. What was left was a control hidden from
1380        // exactly one group: people using a pointer, who are also the group
1381        // scanning a list to find out what can be done to a row.
1382        //
1383        // A settings screen is where that reads worst: the whole reason to be
1384        // on it is to remove a key, and the button doing so was invisible
1385        // until pointed at. A table cell's actions were never hidden, so the
1386        // two arrangements now agree.
1387    }
1388
1389    // A part that may take two lines. `Flow::Tight` gets no rule: one line is
1390    // what a run already does, and restating it here would put a declaration on
1391    // every part in every row to say nothing.
1392    //
1393    // This is the shape both webview apps had already written by hand and
1394    // commented, Balanced Breakfast on a feed row's title, goingson on a
1395    // problem's body, which is the whole argument for the description
1396    // carrying it. `-webkit-` prefixed and unprefixed together: the prefixed
1397    // trio is what every engine actually implements, and `line-clamp` is the
1398    // standard property landing behind it.
1399    let _ = writeln!(
1400        css,
1401        ".{} {{\n    display: -webkit-box;\n    -webkit-box-orient: vertical;\n    -webkit-line-clamp: {lines};\n    line-clamp: {lines};\n    overflow: hidden;\n}}",
1402        class("row-relaxed", opts),
1403        lines = Flow::Relaxed.lines()
1404    );
1405
1406    // A row inside a hierarchy: a tree, an outline, a threaded list.
1407    // makeover-layout names the concept `Nesting`, deliberately not `Depth`,
1408    // which is surface bevel in that crate, and this is the rule. Without it a
1409    // described outline in a browser is a flat list with chevrons in it: the
1410    // folding works and the indent does not exist.
1411    //
1412    // The magnitude is a custom property with a fallback, which is this crate's
1413    // own shape: `--awaiting-gap` above is the precedent, and an app overriding
1414    // `--row-indent` is how a level becomes worth more or less. What a level IS
1415    // stays the description's; what it is WORTH is a renderer's, and a terminal
1416    // spending columns for the same fact is not disagreeing.
1417    //
1418    // Here rather than in each app, and that was a live option rather than an
1419    // oversight. `row-select`, `row-current` and `row-chosen` are app-styled by
1420    // design; the indent is not decoration, it is what the description MEANS,
1421    // and three apps agreeing about it by accident is not agreement.
1422    //
1423    // `padding` and not `margin`: a row is a box that can be selected and
1424    // hovered, and indenting with margin would take the indent out of the
1425    // highlight, so the shading under a nested row would start where its text
1426    // does rather than where its row does.
1427    let _ = writeln!(
1428        css,
1429        ".{} {{\n    padding-inline-start: calc(var(--row-depth, 0) * var(--row-indent, 1.5ch));\n}}",
1430        class("row-nested", opts)
1431    );
1432
1433    // The two halves of a branch, emitted by quasi-webview and unstyled until
1434    // now for the same reason.
1435    //
1436    // A branch row is the one a reader can fold, and the chevron is its hit
1437    // target. The chevron is drawn by the app or the description, this says
1438    // where it sits and how big the target is, which is the accessibility fact
1439    // rather than the decorative one: a control smaller than this is one a
1440    // finger misses.
1441    let _ = writeln!(
1442        css,
1443        ".{} {{\n    display: flex;\n    align-items: baseline;\n    gap: var(--row-disclose-gap, 0.5ch);\n}}",
1444        class("row-branch", opts)
1445    );
1446    let _ = writeln!(
1447        css,
1448        ".{} {{\n    flex: none;\n    min-inline-size: var(--tap-target, 2rem);\n    min-block-size: var(--tap-target, 2rem);\n    background: none;\n    border: 0;\n    color: inherit;\n    cursor: pointer;\n}}",
1449        class("row-disclose", opts)
1450    );
1451
1452    // How a part holds what is in it, for a row and for a table cell. Here
1453    // rather than in quasi-webview's arrangement sheet because these are names
1454    // this crate emits, so a row an app writes by hand gets them too. The row
1455    // itself stays quasi-webview's: where a part sits in the line is the screen
1456    // renderer's arrangement, and nothing here says it.
1457    //
1458    // A token or a control never breaks across two lines. What gives when the
1459    // line runs short is the row's text.
1460    let tokens = class(part_class(RowPart::Tokens), opts);
1461    let actions = class(part_class(RowPart::Actions), opts);
1462    let proportion = class(part_class(RowPart::Proportion), opts);
1463    let fallback = class("row-part", opts);
1464    let cell_tokens = class(cell_part_class(CellPart::Tokens), opts);
1465    let cell_actions = class(cell_part_class(CellPart::Actions), opts);
1466    let cell_fallback = class("cell-part", opts);
1467    let _ = writeln!(
1468        css,
1469        ".{fallback},\n.{cell_fallback} {{\n    min-width: 0;\n}}"
1470    );
1471    let _ = writeln!(
1472        css,
1473        ".{tokens} {{\n    display: flex;\n    flex-wrap: wrap;\n    align-items: center;\n    gap: var(--gap-bound);\n}}"
1474    );
1475    let _ = writeln!(
1476        css,
1477        ".{actions} {{\n    display: flex;\n    flex: none;\n    align-items: center;\n    gap: var(--gap-bound);\n}}"
1478    );
1479    // A cell's parts sit inside the cell's own box, so they are inline: the
1480    // cell's alignment, which the column kind sets, still places them.
1481    let _ = writeln!(
1482        css,
1483        ".{cell_tokens},\n.{cell_actions} {{\n    display: inline-flex;\n    align-items: center;\n    gap: var(--gap-bound);\n}}"
1484    );
1485    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{cell_tokens} {{\n    flex-wrap: wrap;\n}}");
1486    let _ = writeln!(
1487        css,
1488        ".{tokens} > *,\n.{actions} > *,\n.{cell_tokens} > *,\n.{cell_actions} > * {{\n    white-space: nowrap;\n}}"
1489    );
1490    // A proportion is a meter, and a meter is as wide as the row lets it be.
1491    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{proportion} {{\n    flex: 1 1 auto;\n}}");
1492
1493    css
1494}
1495
1496/// A row of things that share their space, and what each fallback gets here.
1497///
1498/// Ruling: wiki `layout-room-and-fallback`, Max. Rule 1 is that every described
1499/// member is in flow, and these rules are how that is kept rather than asked
1500/// for. A member taken out of flow with `position: absolute` contributes zero
1501/// width to the row it shares, so nothing can collide with it and nothing
1502/// prevents the collision.
1503///
1504/// # The floor, which is most of the fix
1505///
1506/// `.run > *` gets `min-width: min-content`. That is the derived minimum the
1507/// ruling asks for, in this renderer's own unit and stated by the browser
1508/// rather than by anybody: a member cannot be squeezed narrower than what is
1509/// in it, so members in one flow push each other instead of overlapping. It
1510/// costs no query and no number, and it is what fixes all four measured widths
1511/// whichever fallback the group declared.
1512///
1513/// # A member that asks to fill
1514///
1515/// `.run > [data-width="fill"]` gets `flex: 1 1 0`, which is the second half of
1516/// what a column has always been able to say, reaching a row of regions.
1517/// `flex-basis: 0` and not `auto` is what makes several fills divide the room
1518/// equally rather than dividing the leftovers in proportion to their contents;
1519/// equal division is [`makeover_layout::Width::Fill`]'s own stated rule. The
1520/// floor above still applies, so a fill cannot shrink under what is in it.
1521///
1522/// A member that says nothing gets nothing, because a flex item with the floor
1523/// and no grow is already content-sized. That is why the omitted value here is
1524/// `Content` while a control omits `Fill`: each position leaves out what it
1525/// already did.
1526///
1527/// # What each fallback gets, exactly
1528///
1529/// [`Fallback::Wrap`] is `flex-wrap: wrap`, and a member that asks to fill gets
1530/// a stated room to start from.
1531///
1532/// Wrapping on its own is not exact. A flex line
1533/// breaks on each member's hypothetical size, a fill member's basis is `0`, and
1534/// the floor above is `min-content`, so the line breaks only once the members'
1535/// intrinsic widths no longer fit. A member holding a table reports almost
1536/// nothing for that: a table's headings and cells are `container-type:
1537/// inline-size`, so the size container refuses to be measured through and a few
1538/// headings are all that is left. Two fill members each holding a table drew as
1539/// two slivers side by side at 420 while both tables overflowed, and the page
1540/// scrolled sideways.
1541///
1542/// So under `Wrap` a fill member's `flex-basis` is
1543/// `min(100%, var(--run-room, 20rem))` rather than `0`: room the description
1544/// states, rather than room measured through a container that will not report
1545/// it. `min(100%, ...)` is what keeps a lone member from overflowing a run
1546/// narrower than the room, and it is the shape quasi's own `main.list-detail`
1547/// regions already fold on. The custom property is how an app says what the
1548/// room is, because the number is a size and sizes are the app's; the fallback
1549/// is a default rather than this crate settling a width.
1550///
1551/// Only under `Wrap`. A fill member in a run that does not wrap keeps
1552/// `flex: 1 1 0`, where equal division is the whole of what it asked for and
1553/// there is no line to break.
1554///
1555/// [`Fallback::Stack`] is wrap plus `flex: 1 1 max-content` on the members, so
1556/// a member that cannot sit beside its sibling takes a line of its own and
1557/// fills it. For the two-member run this was ruled on, a tab strip and a
1558/// band, that is precisely "a row becomes a column".
1559///
1560/// [`Fallback::Shed`] and [`Fallback::Menu`] get wrap, and this renderer is
1561/// honouring less than the description says. **CSS cannot express either one
1562/// without breaking the ruling's own first constraint.** Both need to know that
1563/// the run is out of room in order to take a member out of it, a container
1564/// query is the only construct that can ask, and `@container` compares against
1565/// a `<length>`, there is no `@container (inline-size < min-content)`. So
1566/// every honest spelling of Shed here needs an authored breakpoint, which is
1567/// the thing the ruling exists to forbid, and the dishonest ones are worse: a
1568/// clamped height clips by document order rather than by [`Priority`], and
1569/// `display: none` under a viewport `@media` is the `nth-child(n+5)` bug the
1570/// vocabulary replaced.
1571///
1572/// Wrapping is the right thing to do instead. It keeps every member reachable,
1573/// which is the property that was actually broken, goingson's new-contact
1574/// button left the viewport entirely at 560, and it keeps rule 1. A renderer
1575/// answering with less than was described is precedented and deliberate here:
1576/// [`makeover_layout::Region::Columns`] says a terminal stacking a board's
1577/// columns is honouring the description rather than degrading it.
1578///
1579/// The real mechanism needs the shed members to have somewhere to go, which is
1580/// markup and belongs to quasi-webview: an overflow control is a member of the
1581/// run, and the description does not yet say that a member *is* one.
1582///
1583/// # Menu, once a script is measuring
1584///
1585/// That is now built, in `quasi-webview`'s `menu.js`, and this crate's half of
1586/// it is two classes and one override. A script that has taken a menu run over
1587/// marks it `data-menu`, and a marked run goes back to `nowrap`: wrapping is
1588/// what hides the overflow condition the script is trying to measure. The
1589/// unmarked rule above is untouched, so a page that ships no script still
1590/// wraps, which is rule 1, every member reachable, rather than a strip with
1591/// tabs squeezed off the end.
1592///
1593/// `.run-overflow` is the control the shed members move into and
1594/// `.run-overflow-items` is where they land. The geometry is this crate's the
1595/// way every other surface's is; what is *in* it is the script's, because which
1596/// members no longer fit is a measurement and not a description.
1597fn run_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1598    let run = class("run", opts);
1599    let mut css = String::new();
1600
1601    // `flex-wrap: nowrap` is stated rather than left to the default, because
1602    // the fallbacks below are read as overrides of this line and a reader
1603    // should not have to know which way flexbox leans to see that.
1604    //
1605    // No gap. Spacing between members is the app's, the same way this crate
1606    // states no margins anywhere else; a gap here would be a size, and the one
1607    // hardcoded size in the mechanism is makeover-geometry's contact patch.
1608    let _ = writeln!(
1609        css,
1610        ".{run} {{\n    display: flex;\n    flex-wrap: nowrap;\n    align-items: center;\n}}"
1611    );
1612
1613    // The derived minimum, and the whole reason a member can no longer be
1614    // overlapped. `min-width: auto` is flexbox's default for a flex item and is
1615    // *not* the same thing: auto lets an item be compressed below its content
1616    // in a nowrap run, which is how a toolbar ends up drawn over a tab strip
1617    // even without anything leaving the flow.
1618    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{run} > * {{\n    min-width: min-content;\n}}");
1619
1620    // A member that absorbs what is left. `flex-basis: 0` rather than `auto` is
1621    // what makes several fills divide the room equally instead of dividing the
1622    // leftovers in proportion to what is already in them, which is
1623    // `Width::Fill`'s own rule and the one thing that type states about more
1624    // than one of them.
1625    //
1626    // The `min-width: min-content` floor above is deliberately not overridden.
1627    // A fill that could shrink below its contents would overlap its neighbour,
1628    // which is rule 1, and equal division under a floor is still equal division
1629    // everywhere the floor is not reached.
1630    //
1631    // Attribute rather than class, because the width is a fact the description
1632    // carried rather than a hook this crate invented: the same division
1633    // `data-tone` and `data-selector` are on the right side of. It beats the
1634    // `Stack` rule below on specificity whichever order they are written in,
1635    // which is what a member asking to fill should do to a blanket.
1636    let _ = writeln!(
1637        css,
1638        ".{run} > [data-width=\"fill\"] {{\n    flex: 1 1 0;\n}}"
1639    );
1640
1641    for fallback in [
1642        Fallback::Wrap,
1643        Fallback::Stack,
1644        Fallback::Shed,
1645        Fallback::Menu,
1646    ] {
1647        let name = fallback_class(fallback);
1648        let c = class(name, opts);
1649        let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n    flex-wrap: wrap;\n}}");
1650        if matches!(fallback, Fallback::Stack) {
1651            let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} > * {{\n    flex: 1 1 max-content;\n}}");
1652        }
1653        // The stated room, and only here. Written after the blanket fill rule
1654        // above so it overrides the basis it set; the grow and shrink that rule
1655        // states are deliberately left alone, so several fills still divide one
1656        // line equally and the min-content floor still stops any of them
1657        // shrinking under its contents.
1658        if matches!(fallback, Fallback::Wrap) {
1659            let _ = writeln!(
1660                css,
1661                ".{c} > [data-width=\"fill\"] {{\n    \
1662                 flex-basis: min(100%, var(--run-room, 20rem));\n}}"
1663            );
1664        }
1665    }
1666
1667    // A menu run a script has taken over. The mark is the script's and this is
1668    // the only rule that reads it: wrapping is what a run does when nothing is
1669    // measuring, and it is also what makes the overflow unmeasurable, since a
1670    // wrapped run always fits. The two cannot both be on.
1671    let menu = class(fallback_class(Fallback::Menu), opts);
1672    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{menu}[data-menu] {{\n    flex-wrap: nowrap;\n}}");
1673
1674    // The overflow control, and it is a member of the run like any other: in
1675    // flow, at the end, taking the width of what is in it. `relative` is what
1676    // the items hang off.
1677    let overflow = class("run-overflow", opts);
1678    let items = class("run-overflow-items", opts);
1679    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{overflow} {{\n    position: relative;\n}}");
1680
1681    // Overlaid rather than in flow, for the reason every menu is: a control
1682    // that pushed the page down when it opened would change the layout it was
1683    // opened to escape. `inset-inline-end: 0` rather than a left, so the panel
1684    // stays on the page in both writing directions.
1685    //
1686    // No width, no padding and no border. All three are sizes and sizes are
1687    // makeover-geometry's; what is stated here is placement, the surface and
1688    // the shadow that separates it from the page, which is the same division
1689    // `figure_rules` and the timeline entry make. The elevation shadow is what
1690    // an overlaid surface takes instead of an edge, see `ELEVATION_PROPERTY`.
1691    let _ = writeln!(
1692        css,
1693        ".{items} {{\n    \
1694         position: absolute;\n    \
1695         inset-block-start: 100%;\n    \
1696         inset-inline-end: 0;\n    \
1697         z-index: 1;\n    \
1698         display: flex;\n    \
1699         flex-direction: column;\n    \
1700         align-items: stretch;\n    \
1701         background: var(--surface-raised);\n    \
1702         box-shadow: var(--elevation-overlay);\n\
1703         }}"
1704    );
1705
1706    // `hidden` is how the script closes it, and a flex display would otherwise
1707    // beat the attribute's own `display: none`.
1708    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{items}[hidden] {{\n    display: none;\n}}");
1709
1710    css
1711}
1712
1713/// Every class [`fallback_class`] can return, plus the run itself.
1714///
1715/// [`ROW_PART_CLASSES`](crate::list::ROW_PART_CLASSES)'s reasoning and the same
1716/// obligation: a `match` over a `#[non_exhaustive]` enum cannot be enumerated
1717/// from outside, so the list sits beside it and a test holds the two together.
1718/// `run` is in it because it is emitted in its own right rather than only as a
1719/// fallback's fallback.
1720pub const RUN_CLASSES: &[&str] = &[
1721    "run",
1722    "run-wrap",
1723    "run-stack",
1724    "run-shed",
1725    "run-menu",
1726    // Not returned by `fallback_class`: these two are the overflow control a
1727    // measuring renderer builds, and they are in the list because the list is
1728    // what a host seals its vocabulary against. A class emitted by a script and
1729    // missing from here is a control with no surface and no edge.
1730    "run-overflow",
1731    "run-overflow-items",
1732];
1733
1734/// The class a run carries for what it does when it is tight.
1735///
1736/// A run always carries `.run` as well, so an unrecognised fallback, the enum
1737/// is `#[non_exhaustive]`, lands as a plain nowrap row with the min-content
1738/// floor still under it. That is the safe failure: every member in flow and
1739/// none overlapped, which is the property, with only the rearrangement missing.
1740#[must_use]
1741pub fn fallback_class(fallback: Fallback) -> &'static str {
1742    match fallback {
1743        Fallback::Wrap => "run-wrap",
1744        Fallback::Stack => "run-stack",
1745        Fallback::Shed => "run-shed",
1746        Fallback::Menu => "run-menu",
1747        _ => "run",
1748    }
1749}
1750
1751/// What a wait looks like, for the attribute that has been describing one to
1752/// nobody.
1753///
1754/// Wiki `loading-and-progress-standard`, phase 2. `data-awaiting` is emitted
1755/// as `data-awaiting="determinate"` with a `data-awaiting-amount` beside it, or
1756/// `data-awaiting="indeterminate"` alone. This is the half that styles them,
1757/// without which the two render identically.
1758///
1759/// # Why it is keyed on `aria-busy` and not on the attribute alone
1760///
1761/// `data-awaiting` is a fact about the control: pressing this waits. It is true
1762/// when the page is painted and it stays true. Whether a wait is *running* is
1763/// true only between two events, so it is the binder's to set, and `aria-busy`
1764/// is the standard spelling of it, announced as well as drawn, which a class
1765/// of our own would not be.
1766///
1767/// That also keeps this crate out of any one client library's vocabulary.
1768/// `quasi-webview` sets `aria-busy` from htmx's request events; a host driving
1769/// the same markup another way sets it the same way and gets the same drawing.
1770///
1771/// # The two drawings
1772///
1773/// One pseudo-element either way, so no renderer has to emit an extra node.
1774///
1775/// Indeterminate is the activity mark of rule 2: a small square that blinks.
1776/// Determinate is a trough with a fill, drawn as a single gradient whose stop is
1777/// `--awaiting-share`, a plain number from 0 to 1 that the binder sets from
1778/// bytes it has actually watched land. A determinate control with nothing
1779/// setting the share draws an empty trough rather than a full one, which is the
1780/// honest reading: the size is known and the delivery is not.
1781///
1782/// **What the bar may not do**, from rule 1 and from `Awaiting`'s own docs:
1783/// what is done over what there is, and never a remaining time, an arrival time
1784/// or a rate extrapolated forward. Nothing here can express one, which is
1785/// deliberate, the only input is a share of a measured payload.
1786///
1787/// # Sizes, and the deferral rule
1788///
1789/// `progress_rules` emits the tones and never the width, because the width is
1790/// not this crate's to know. A pseudo-element has no intrinsic size at all, so
1791/// the same treatment would render nothing anywhere. Both sizes are therefore
1792/// custom properties with defaults: an app that wants a different mark sets
1793/// `--awaiting-mark` and `--awaiting-bar` once, and one that says nothing gets a
1794/// mark that is visible.
1795///
1796/// # The cadence, and what happens without it
1797///
1798/// `--cadence-activity` comes from `makeover-timing` through [`build`](mod@crate::build),
1799/// and is a half-period, so a full cycle is twice it. It is used bare rather
1800/// than with a fallback: a number written here would be a second heartbeat for
1801/// a mark three renderers draw.
1802///
1803/// A sheet assembled without the time axis leaves `animation-duration` invalid,
1804/// which resolves to `0s`, which runs no animation and leaves the base style ,
1805/// a lit, still mark. That is also exactly what the reduced-motion block does,
1806/// since it sets the cadence to `0ms`. Both fall out of one rule because the
1807/// base style is lit and the keyframes do the dimming, which is the ordering
1808/// `makeover_timing::reduced_motion_css` asks its consumers for by name.
1809fn awaiting_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1810    let mut css = String::new();
1811
1812    // Dimming rather than lighting, so a zero-length animation leaves a lit
1813    // mark rather than a blank one. See `makeover_timing::reduced_motion_css`.
1814    css.push_str(
1815        "@keyframes makeover-activity {\n    \
1816         0%, 49.99% {\n        background: var(--action);\n    }\n    \
1817         50%, 100% {\n        background: var(--surface-sunken);\n    }\n\
1818         }\n",
1819    );
1820
1821    // Nothing is drawn until something is waiting. `content` on the base rule
1822    // rather than on the busy one keeps the box the same box across the
1823    // transition, so a mark appearing does not reflow the line it is in.
1824    let _ = writeln!(
1825        css,
1826        "[data-awaiting]::after {{\n    \
1827         content: \"\";\n    \
1828         display: none;\n    \
1829         margin-inline-start: var(--awaiting-gap, 0.5ch);\n    \
1830         vertical-align: baseline;\n\
1831         }}"
1832    );
1833
1834    let _ = writeln!(
1835        css,
1836        "[data-awaiting][aria-busy=\"true\"]::after {{\n    \
1837         display: inline-block;\n    \
1838         inline-size: var(--awaiting-mark, 0.5em);\n    \
1839         block-size: var(--awaiting-mark, 0.5em);\n    \
1840         background: var(--action);\n    \
1841         opacity: 1;\n    \
1842         animation: makeover-activity calc(var(--cadence-activity) * 2) \
1843         step-end infinite;\n\
1844         }}"
1845    );
1846
1847    // The measured half. A wider box, no blink, and a gradient whose stop is
1848    // the share: the fill and the trough in one paint, so the markup stays one
1849    // pseudo-element on both branches.
1850    //
1851    // `--awaiting-share` unset is an empty trough, not a full one. A bar that
1852    // read full because nobody was counting would be the confidently-wrong
1853    // drawing rule 1 exists to forbid.
1854    //
1855    // The trough takes an edge for the reason a well does: a bar at zero share
1856    // is otherwise a rectangle of the surface it sits on, which is nothing at
1857    // all. `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` and
1858    // `track_rules` write theirs.
1859    let _ = writeln!(
1860        css,
1861        "[data-awaiting=\"determinate\"][aria-busy=\"true\"]::after {{\n    \
1862         inline-size: var(--awaiting-bar, 6em);\n    \
1863         animation: none;\n    \
1864         outline: {} solid var(--border);\n    \
1865         outline-offset: -{};\n    \
1866         background: linear-gradient(\n        \
1867         to inline-end,\n        \
1868         var(--action) 0 calc(var(--awaiting-share, 0) * 100%),\n        \
1869         var(--surface-sunken) 0\n    \
1870         );\n\
1871         }}",
1872        opts.border_width, opts.border_width
1873    );
1874
1875    css
1876}
1877
1878/// A strip of figures, and the two spans inside each one.
1879///
1880/// Colour only, which is the deferral rule applied to a component that badly
1881/// wants to break it. A figure reads as a figure because the value is set large
1882/// over a small caption, and that is a size: `makeover-geometry` answers how
1883/// much space and this crate answers what the thing is. Emitting `font-size`
1884/// here would be this crate naming a value, which is the one thing it is defined
1885/// by not doing, and `progress_rules` is the precedent, it emits the tones and
1886/// never the width, because the width is not its to know.
1887///
1888/// So the type scale is the app's, and what is generated is the part an app
1889/// cannot get right by itself: which of the two spans carries the tone, and,
1890/// from 0.82.0, the strip the figures sit in.
1891/// A definition list, and the two tracks that make its values line up.
1892///
1893/// **The alignment is the whole member.** Five goingson panes were saying
1894/// labelled facts as a row each, and rendered that way every value started
1895/// after its own label, so no column formed and the eye had nothing to run
1896/// down. A grid with one label track sized to the longest label is the fix, and
1897/// it is something only the set can do, which is why `Node::Facts` carries
1898/// the set rather than each pair.
1899///
1900/// `max-content` on the first track and not a fixed width: the label column is
1901/// as wide as the longest label and no wider, which is what keeps a pane of
1902/// short labels from leaving a canyon before the values.
1903///
1904/// The value takes `content` and the label reads back. goingson had that the
1905/// other way round, muted values against unmuted labels, so the part a
1906/// person came for was the quieter of the two. Same rule `figure_rules` states
1907/// for a value against its caption, and `row` for primary against meta.
1908fn facts_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1909    let facts = class("facts", opts);
1910    let label = class("facts-label", opts);
1911    let value = class("facts-value", opts);
1912    let mut css = String::new();
1913
1914    let _ = writeln!(
1915        css,
1916        ".{facts} {{\n    display: grid;\n    grid-template-columns: max-content 1fr;\n    \
1917         column-gap: var(--gap-section);\n    row-gap: var(--gap-peer);\n    margin: 0;\n}}"
1918    );
1919    // `dt` and `dd` both carry a browser margin that would break the tracks.
1920    let _ = writeln!(
1921        css,
1922        ".{facts} > .{label} {{\n    margin: 0;\n    color: var(--content-secondary);\n}}"
1923    );
1924    let _ = writeln!(
1925        css,
1926        ".{facts} > .{value} {{\n    margin: 0;\n    color: var(--content);\n}}"
1927    );
1928    css
1929}
1930
1931/// A picture, its frame and its caption.
1932///
1933/// # The frame is a border, and this is the one place a bevel is wrong
1934///
1935/// Emitting [`Depth::Raised`] here through [`depth_rule`], the same call
1936/// `button` and `card` make, is wrong, and MNW's landing page is where it
1937/// showed: **the frames had no visible edge at all.**
1938///
1939/// `Depth::Raised`'s edge is `--bevel-raised`, which is an *inset* shadow, a
1940/// 1px light run at the top-left and a dark one at the bottom-right, drawn
1941/// **inside** the element's box. On a button or a card that box is a surface
1942/// this crate owns, so an inset edge reads as the surface catching the light.
1943/// On a picture it is drawn on top of the picture, over whatever pixels the
1944/// image happens to have at its border. MNW's screenshots are light-on-light
1945/// parchment, so the light half landed on a light image and the frame
1946/// disappeared.
1947///
1948/// **You cannot bevel a surface you do not own.** A picture's content is the
1949/// app's, arrives at request time, and can be any colour, so its edge has to
1950/// sit *outside* the content rather than on it. That is a border.
1951///
1952/// The fill stays, and it is not decoration: it is what shows through a
1953/// transparent PNG and what stands in the frame's place while the image is
1954/// still loading.
1955///
1956/// This is a real limit on [`Depth`] rather than a special case. Every other
1957/// consumer of a depth draws its own surface; a picture is the first member
1958/// whose surface belongs to someone else.
1959///
1960/// # No size
1961///
1962/// `width: 100%` and nothing else. How large a picture is depends on the box it
1963/// was put in, which is the app's arrangement and `makeover-geometry`'s scales,
1964/// and a renderer that picked one would be answering for every consumer at
1965/// once. This is where `figure_rules` landed for the same reason.
1966fn picture_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1967    let picture = class("picture", opts);
1968    let img = class("picture-img", opts);
1969    let caption = class("picture-caption", opts);
1970    let mut css = String::new();
1971
1972    // Block, or an inline image sits on the text baseline and carries a
1973    // descender's worth of space under it that no app ever wants and every app
1974    // deletes by hand. The border is the frame; see the type docs for why it is
1975    // not the bevel every other surface here gets.
1976    let _ = writeln!(
1977        css,
1978        ".{img} {{\n    display: block;\n    width: 100%;\n    height: auto;\n    \
1979         background: var(--{});\n    border: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1980        Fill::Raised.token(),
1981        opts.border_width
1982    );
1983
1984    // The two fits that need a rule. `Fit::Natural` emits no attribute at all,
1985    // so it is the bare rule above and needs nothing here.
1986    let _ = writeln!(
1987        css,
1988        ".{img}[data-fit=\"cover\"] {{\n    height: 100%;\n    object-fit: cover;\n}}"
1989    );
1990    let _ = writeln!(
1991        css,
1992        ".{img}[data-fit=\"contain\"] {{\n    height: 100%;\n    object-fit: contain;\n}}"
1993    );
1994
1995    // A caption reads back one step, which is `figure-caption`'s answer and the
1996    // same claim: it says what the thing above it is, and it is not the thing.
1997    let _ = writeln!(
1998        css,
1999        ".{picture} > .{caption} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
2000    );
2001
2002    css
2003}
2004
2005/// A region showing one child at a time, and the chrome that moves between them.
2006///
2007/// [`makeover_layout::Showing`] lets a description say that a region holds
2008/// several children and shows some of them. A renderer derives its own chrome
2009/// from that, which is what stops every renderer growing a `match` on a widget
2010/// name; these are the rules the derived chrome needs.
2011///
2012/// # Why the default is every child, and the enhancement takes them away
2013///
2014/// The controls are a lie until something binds them. A prev button rendered
2015/// into a document with no script is a control that looks live and answers
2016/// nothing, and the reader it lies to is exactly the one who cannot see the
2017/// other children either, the collapsing and the moving are the same half.
2018///
2019/// So the rules run in the direction the enhancement does. Nothing here hides a
2020/// child and nothing here shows a control. Whatever binds the region sets
2021/// `data-ready` on it, and that is what collapses the stack to one and reveals
2022/// the row that moves it. A reader with no script gets every child in order and
2023/// no controls, which is more content rather than less, and a reader with
2024/// script gets a settled page rather than a stack that jumps to one frame after
2025/// load.
2026///
2027/// MNW proved this shape by hand, a `<noscript>` stylesheet opening its
2028/// carousel back out, and it is here rather than there because the property is
2029/// the description's, not one app's.
2030///
2031/// # Not spacing
2032///
2033/// The row's gaps are `makeover-geometry`'s question and are absent for
2034/// [`row_rules`]'s reason. What is here is `display`, which carries no
2035/// magnitude, and the muted readout, which is the same claim `picture-caption`
2036/// makes: it says where you are among the children and it is not one of them.
2037fn showing_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2038    let controls = class("showing", opts);
2039    let position = class("showing-position", opts);
2040    let frame = class("showing-frame", opts);
2041    let mut css = String::new();
2042
2043    // Hidden until something binds it, which is the whole argument above.
2044    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{controls} {{\n    display: none;\n}}");
2045    // Block, and nothing about how the three sit in it. A button and a span are
2046    // inline already, so they make a row without this crate saying so, and
2047    // saying so is where `align-items` and a gap would follow, both spacing,
2048    // both `makeover-geometry`'s, and `row_rules` refuses them for the same
2049    // reason.
2050    let _ = writeln!(
2051        css,
2052        "[data-ready] > .{controls} {{\n    display: block;\n}}"
2053    );
2054
2055    // A child is in flow until the region is bound, and then only the current
2056    // one is. `.current` is a modifier for the reason `.chosen` and `.latched`
2057    // are: one name for the state, set by whoever knows it.
2058    let _ = writeln!(
2059        css,
2060        "[data-ready] > .{frame}:not(.current) {{\n    display: none;\n}}"
2061    );
2062
2063    // Reads back one step. `picture-caption`'s rule and its reason.
2064    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{position} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
2065
2066    css
2067}
2068
2069/// A time axis: the container, its gridlines and ruler, and the placed things.
2070///
2071/// [`Track`](makeover_layout::Track), the one member here whose whole point is
2072/// *position*. That makes the magnitude line this crate keeps worth restating
2073/// rather than assuming.
2074///
2075/// # Where the numbers come from
2076///
2077/// Every value that varies per item is a custom property the caller sets
2078/// inline, and every rule here reads one. `--track-at` and `--track-for` are
2079/// percentages of the span, which
2080/// [`Track::fraction`](makeover_layout::Track::fraction) computes once so three
2081/// renderers cannot disagree about it. Nothing here knows a pixel.
2082///
2083/// That is what lets the stylesheet stay static while the items move: an entry
2084/// carries `style="--track-at: 37.5%; --track-for: 4.166%"` and the rule below
2085/// turns it into a box. The alternative was emitting a rule per item, which is
2086/// a stylesheet that grows with the data.
2087///
2088/// **The height of the track is the app's**, not this crate's. 96 quarter-hour
2089/// slots at some slot height is a size, and a size is `makeover-geometry`'s
2090/// question, the same refusal `figure_rules` and `placeholder_rules` make.
2091/// Percentages need a resolved height above them, so `.track` gets
2092/// `position: relative` and nothing else; the app says how tall a day is.
2093///
2094/// # Overlap
2095///
2096/// Two things at the same time is intrinsic to an axis and has no analogue in a
2097/// list. The description does not declare it, `Placement::overlaps` derives it
2098/// from the times, so what arrives here is a lane index and a lane count, and
2099/// the rule divides the width. A renderer that would rather stack them ignores
2100/// both properties and the defaults give it one full-width lane.
2101fn track_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2102    let track = class("track", opts);
2103    let slot = class("track-slot", opts);
2104    let tick = class("track-tick", opts);
2105    let entry = class("track-entry", opts);
2106    let mut css = String::new();
2107
2108    // The positioning context every entry resolves against, and the whole of
2109    // what this crate says about the container. No height: see the doc above.
2110    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{track} {{\n    position: relative;\n}}");
2111
2112    // Gridlines and the ruler are the axis reading itself back, which is
2113    // `picture-caption` and `showing-position`'s claim: about the thing rather
2114    // than one of the things.
2115    //
2116    // `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` writes its
2117    // edge. A gridline is the one place a timeline would most naturally reach
2118    // for a hardcoded 1px, and a hardcoded 1px is this crate naming a size.
2119    let _ = writeln!(
2120        css,
2121        ".{slot} {{\n    border-top: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
2122        opts.border_width
2123    );
2124    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{tick} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
2125
2126    // The one rule that does real work. Top and height are the placement;
2127    // left and width are the lane. Both lane properties default so an entry
2128    // that names neither is full width, which is the common case and the one a
2129    // renderer gets for free.
2130    let _ = writeln!(
2131        css,
2132        ".{entry} {{\n    \
2133         position: absolute;\n    \
2134         top: var(--track-at, 0%);\n    \
2135         height: var(--track-for, 100%);\n    \
2136         left: calc(var(--track-lane, 0) / var(--track-lanes, 1) * 100%);\n    \
2137         width: calc(100% / var(--track-lanes, 1));\n\
2138         }}"
2139    );
2140
2141    css
2142}
2143
2144/// A region's stand-in, and the header of a table that can be reordered.
2145///
2146/// Both are colour and affordance only, the same place `figure_rules` lands:
2147/// emitting a type scale is not this crate's. How much room
2148/// a stand-in gets is a size, goingson has the same one at three, as
2149/// `--compact`, `--dashboard` and `--padded`, and a size is
2150/// `makeover-geometry`'s question.
2151///
2152/// The caret is the one thing here that is neither colour nor affordance, and it
2153/// is a renderer's own expression rather than a value the description named:
2154/// `aria-sort` is what the table actually says, and this turns it into something
2155/// visible for everyone not using a screen reader. A terminal draws its own; an
2156/// immediate-mode painter draws its own.
2157fn state_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2158    let placeholder = class("placeholder", opts);
2159    let text = class("placeholder-text", opts);
2160    let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
2161    let mut css = String::new();
2162
2163    let _ = writeln!(
2164        css,
2165        ".{placeholder} > .{text} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
2166    );
2167    // Only the failure is toned. An empty list is the normal state of a new
2168    // install, and `Readiness::tone` is what says so.
2169    let _ = writeln!(
2170        css,
2171        ".{placeholder}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{text} {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
2172        Tone::Danger.token()
2173    );
2174    // A stand-in that is waiting draws on a sunken ground, so it does not
2175    // read as one that is empty: both say a sentence where content will be,
2176    // and only the ground says whether anything is coming. A step of the
2177    // neutral ramp rather than a tone, since waiting is not a status. The
2178    // sentence carries the same news to a screen reader through the region's
2179    // own `aria-busy`. The inset is a gap step, so the ground reads as a
2180    // ground rather than a highlight under the words.
2181    let _ = writeln!(
2182        css,
2183        ".{placeholder}[data-state=\"pending\"] {{\n    background: var(--surface-sunken);\n    \
2184         padding: var(--gap-bound) var(--gap-peer);\n    \
2185         border-radius: var(--radius-fine);\n}}"
2186    );
2187    // A sentence that carries a status draws an edge in that status, the way
2188    // a figure does, and keeps its ink. A bare sentence was the one member
2189    // that accepted a tone and drew none of it; drawing the words in the tone
2190    // is what a figure's numbers measured at 1.24:1 to 2.27:1, and a
2191    // sentence is read the same way. Same edge and inset as the figure's.
2192    let sentence = class("text", opts);
2193    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
2194        let _ = writeln!(
2195            css,
2196            ".{sentence}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    border-inline-start: {1} solid var(--{0});\n    \
2197             padding-inline-start: var(--step-snug);\n}}",
2198            tone.token(),
2199            opts.focus_width
2200        );
2201    }
2202    // The way out stands a group apart from the sentence it answers. A gap
2203    // step rather than a size: how much room the stand-in gets is still the
2204    // app's.
2205    let _ = writeln!(
2206        css,
2207        ".{placeholder} > .{} {{\n    margin-block-start: var(--gap-group);\n}}",
2208        class("placeholder-action", opts)
2209    );
2210
2211    // A header that reorders the table is a control, and the pointer is the
2212    // only part of saying so that is not the app's own type and spacing.
2213    let _ = writeln!(
2214        css,
2215        ".{heading}[data-sortable] {{\n    cursor: pointer;\n}}"
2216    );
2217    // The caret carries its own leading space, the way `makeover-tui` and
2218    // `makeover-immediate` both write `" \u{25B2}"`. An app adding the gap
2219    // itself would do it the obvious way, as `content`, and app CSS outranks
2220    // this crate's cascade layer, so it would win over the glyph and leave the
2221    // heading with no caret at all. With the space emitted here there is
2222    // nothing left for one to add.
2223    //
2224    // Three states, three tones, on the convention in wiki
2225    // `three-tone-convention`. A column in force is `content`; a column offering
2226    // to reorder and not doing it now is `content-secondary`, because it still
2227    // answers a press; a column that is not sortable emits no caret at all and
2228    // takes nothing. The idle arm draws its glyph rather than hiding it and
2229    // reserving the box, so there is no reservation to get right.
2230    //
2231    // The glyph is `Sort::glyph`, escaped rather than written: a CSS `content`
2232    // string cannot carry the character literally through this file's own
2233    // escaping, and spelling it here as well would put the third copy back that
2234    // `makeover-layout` 0.27.5 exists to remove.
2235    //
2236    // On the heading's `.cell-in`, so the caret sits beside the label inside
2237    // its padding rather than at the far edge of a column that grew.
2238    let cell_in = class("cell-in", opts);
2239    let _ = writeln!(
2240        css,
2241        ".{heading}[data-sortable] > .{cell_in}::after \
2242         {{\n    content: \" {}\";\n    color: var(--content-secondary);\n}}",
2243        css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())
2244    );
2245    for direction in [Sort::Ascending, Sort::Descending] {
2246        let _ = writeln!(
2247            css,
2248            ".{heading}[aria-sort=\"{}\"] > .{cell_in}::after \
2249             {{\n    content: \" {}\";\n    color: var(--content);\n}}",
2250            direction.as_str(),
2251            css_escape(direction.glyph())
2252        );
2253    }
2254    css
2255}
2256
2257/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
2258///
2259/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
2260/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
2261/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
2262#[must_use]
2263pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2264    let mut css = String::new();
2265    css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
2266    css.push_str(&link_rules(opts));
2267    css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
2268    css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
2269    css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
2270    css.push_str(&run_rules(opts));
2271    css.push_str(&meter::progress_rules(opts));
2272    css.push_str(&chart::rules(opts));
2273    css.push_str(&awaiting_rules(opts));
2274    css.push_str(&figure::figure_rules(opts));
2275    css.push_str(&facts_rules(opts));
2276    css.push_str(&picture_rules(opts));
2277    css.push_str(&showing_rules(opts));
2278    css.push_str(&track_rules(opts));
2279    css.push_str(&state_rules(opts));
2280    css.push_str(&table_rules(opts));
2281    css.push_str(&facet::facet_rules(opts));
2282    css.push_str(&form::group_rules(opts));
2283    css.push_str(&form::editor_rules(opts));
2284    css.push_str(&form::suggestion_rules(opts));
2285    css.push_str(&form::unit_rules(opts));
2286    css.push_str(&form::option_detail_rules(opts));
2287    css.push_str(&form::note_rules(opts));
2288    css.push_str(&leaving_rules());
2289    css
2290}
2291
2292/// How a transient notice goes away.
2293///
2294/// `makeover-timing` says that `Intent::Dismiss` is how long a notice lives
2295/// *before it starts to leave*, and that the leaving itself is `Motion::Fade`.
2296/// The `build` module writes `--motion-fade` into every consumer's `timing.css`,
2297/// and this is the rule that reads it. Removing the node the moment the dismiss
2298/// is up skips the leaving entirely.
2299///
2300/// # Why an attribute and not a class
2301///
2302/// [`Emit`]'s prefix moves every class this crate writes, so a class here would
2303/// have to be resolved through `class()` by whoever sets it, and the party
2304/// setting it is a script, which has no prefix to hand. `data-leaving` is
2305/// outside that namespace, so a renderer can set it from JavaScript with no
2306/// coordination.
2307///
2308/// The transition sits on the notice and the opacity on the leaving state, so
2309/// the element is transitionable before the attribute arrives; a transition
2310/// declared in the same rule as the value it changes has nothing to animate
2311/// from.
2312///
2313/// # Reduced motion is handled by the token, not by a second rule here
2314///
2315/// `timing.css` already zeroes `--motion-fade` under `prefers-reduced-motion`.
2316/// The reader who asked for less motion gets an instant change rather than a
2317/// fade, and the renderer that sets the attribute must still remove the node on
2318/// a timer rather than on `transitionend`, a zero-length transition may fire
2319/// no event at all, and a node waiting on one that never comes stays forever.
2320///
2321/// The fallback is `0ms` and not a guessed duration: a page with no timing
2322/// sheet has not opted into this vocabulary, and the honest answer there is the
2323/// behaviour it had before, which is the notice going away at once.
2324fn leaving_rules() -> String {
2325    let mut css = String::new();
2326    let _ = writeln!(
2327        css,
2328        "[data-notice] {{\n    transition: opacity var(--motion-fade, 0ms) \
2329         ease-out;\n}}"
2330    );
2331    let _ = writeln!(css, "[data-notice][data-leaving] {{\n    opacity: 0;\n}}");
2332    css
2333}
2334
2335/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, in
2336/// [`CSS_LAYER`], under a generated-file banner.
2337///
2338/// The banner sits outside the layer, because a comment participates in no
2339/// cascade and a reader opening the file should see what it is before seeing
2340/// an at-rule.
2341#[must_use]
2342pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
2343    let body = in_css_layer(&format!(
2344        ":root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
2345        bevel_properties(opts),
2346        depth_rules(opts),
2347        component_rules(opts)
2348    ));
2349    // Counted from the body rather than through `vocabulary::names`, which
2350    // calls back into here.
2351    let classes = vocabulary::classes_in_css(&body).len();
2352    let version = VERSION;
2353    format!(
2354        "/* Generated by makeover-webview {version} from makeover-layout, \
2355         {classes} classes.\n   \
2356         Do not edit. The version and the count are here because a stale\n   \
2357         lockfile fails silently: an older emitter writes a well-formed sheet\n   \
2358         with components missing, and nothing else in the file says so. If\n   \
2359         this version trails what the manifest asks for, re-resolve.\n\n   \
2360         Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n   \
2361         them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout.\n\n   \
2362         Everything below is in the `{CSS_LAYER}` cascade layer. Declare the\n   \
2363         order once in your own stylesheet, or this layer's position is decided\n   \
2364         by whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:\n\n   \
2365         @layer {CSS_LAYER}, base, components, responsive; */\n{body}"
2366    )
2367}
2368
2369#[cfg(test)]
2370mod tests;