makeover_webview/lib.rs
1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet
19//!
20//! This module emits component CSS and no markup, deliberately. GoingsOn has
21//! 145 `innerHTML` sites and Balanced Breakfast 175 `createElement` sites;
22//! moving markup is a migration, while adopting a generated stylesheet is a
23//! deletion. The apps keep every line of their markup and gain the classes.
24//!
25//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
26//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
27//!
28//! # Phase B: the markup, one description at a time
29//!
30//! [`form`] renders [`makeover_layout::Field`], which is the half of phase B
31//! whose description is settled. It emits strings, because both apps
32//! interpolate their fields into larger string-built forms and returning nodes
33//! would rewrite those too. It owns its own escaping, on the reasoning in that
34//! module: a Rust encoder can cover element text and attribute values with one
35//! function, where the apps need four and have to choose correctly at every
36//! call site.
37//!
38//! Rows and tables are the other half and are not here yet.
39//!
40//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
41//!
42//! Decided 2026-07-29 against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a
43//! component list. The useful finding there was that `.btn` (line 644),
44//! `.card` (768) and `.tag, .badge` (882) each hand-write the same
45//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
46//!
47//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
48//! not be described as a pure deletion:
49//!
50//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
51//! [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
52//! will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
53//! and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
54//! where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
55//! hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
56//! that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
57//! answer is there and not here.
58//! - **Badges go flat.** See [`token_rules`].
59//!
60//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
61//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
62//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
63//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
64//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
65//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
66//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
67//!
68//! # Substitution, three ways
69//!
70//! `Fill::Well` has no colour on makeover before 2.3.0, and each renderer
71//! answers that differently, which is the evidence that dropping
72//! `Fill::fallback` from the description was right:
73//!
74//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
75//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
76//! terminal would quantise the two together.
77//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
78//! var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
79//! decides anything.
80
81#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
82
83pub mod form;
84
85use makeover_layout::{Bevel, Depth, Fill, Intent, RowPart, Selector, Token, Tone};
86use std::fmt::Write as _;
87
88/// How the emitted CSS is shaped.
89#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
90pub struct Emit {
91 /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
92 ///
93 /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: border widths belong to
94 /// `makeover-geometry` and will come from there once it carries them.
95 pub border_width: &'static str,
96 /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
97 pub class_prefix: &'static str,
98}
99
100impl Default for Emit {
101 fn default() -> Self {
102 Self {
103 border_width: "1px",
104 class_prefix: "",
105 }
106 }
107}
108
109/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
110#[must_use]
111pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
112 match bevel {
113 Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
114 Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
115 }
116}
117
118/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
119/// the intent may be absent.
120///
121/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
122/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
123#[must_use]
124pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
125 match fill {
126 Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
127 other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
128 }
129}
130
131/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
132///
133/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
134/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
135/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
136/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
137#[must_use]
138pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
139 let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
140 let w = opts.border_width;
141 format!(
142 "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} -{w} 0 var(--{})",
143 top_left.token(),
144 bottom_right.token()
145 )
146}
147
148/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
149///
150/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
151/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
152/// without the fill reads the property directly.
153#[must_use]
154pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
155 let mut css = String::new();
156 for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset] {
157 let _ = writeln!(
158 css,
159 " {}: {};",
160 bevel_var(bevel),
161 bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
162 );
163 }
164 css
165}
166
167/// The class name for a depth.
168#[must_use]
169pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
170 let name = match depth {
171 Depth::Flat => return None,
172 Depth::Raised => "raised",
173 Depth::Well => "well",
174 Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
175 // A depth added to the description since this renderer was last
176 // built. No class, on the same footing as Flat: emitting a name
177 // whose rule body we cannot write would put a class in the markup
178 // that the stylesheet never defines.
179 _ => return None,
180 };
181 Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
182}
183
184/// A prefixed class name.
185fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
186 format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix)
187}
188
189/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
190///
191/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
192/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
193/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
194/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
195///
196/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
197/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both, which this did before makeover-layout
198/// 0.3.0, silently dropped the fill for exactly that case. Independent does not
199/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
200/// disagree about what the region is.
201#[must_use]
202pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
203 let mut css = String::new();
204 if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
205 let _ = writeln!(css, " background: {};", fill_var(fill));
206 }
207 if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
208 let _ = writeln!(css, " box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
209 }
210 css
211}
212
213/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
214/// nothing.
215#[must_use]
216pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
217 let body = depth_declarations(depth);
218 if body.is_empty() {
219 return String::new();
220 }
221 format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
222}
223
224/// Hover and pressed, for a selector that answers a click.
225///
226/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
227/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
228/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
229/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
230/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
231/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
232///
233/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
234/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
235/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
236/// consumed until now.
237#[must_use]
238pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str) -> String {
239 format!(
240 ".{selector}:hover {{\n background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n{}",
241 depth_rule(&format!("{selector}:active"), Depth::Raised.pressed())
242 )
243}
244
245/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
246///
247/// A pressed rule rides along with the raised one, because the cascade can
248/// carry a state that an immediate-mode renderer has to resolve per call site.
249/// That is the one thing this renderer gets for free and the others do not.
250#[must_use]
251pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
252 let mut css = String::new();
253 for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
254 let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
255 continue;
256 };
257 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
258 }
259 if let Some(raised) = depth_class(Depth::Raised, opts) {
260 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&raised));
261 }
262 css
263}
264
265/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
266///
267/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
268/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
269/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
270/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
271/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
272/// drifting apart again.
273fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
274 let mut css = String::new();
275 for name in ["button", "card"] {
276 let c = class(name, opts);
277 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, Depth::Raised));
278 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c));
279 }
280
281 let field = class("field", opts);
282 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
283
284 // Keyed on the ARIA attribute rather than on a class, so the visual state
285 // and the accessible state cannot drift apart: there is one fact and both
286 // read it. goingson already drove its invalid styling this way and was
287 // right to; the `.invalid` class this emitted before 0.5.0 was a second
288 // place to forget.
289 //
290 // The ring composes *after* the bevel rather than replacing it. box-shadow
291 // is not additive, so a lone ring silently dropped the well out from under
292 // an invalid field. Flat and unlit: this edge is saying "wrong", and
293 // lighting one side would have it say "raised" at the same time.
294 let _ = writeln!(
295 css,
296 ".{field}[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {{\n box-shadow: var({}), 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
297 bevel_var(Bevel::Inset),
298 opts.border_width
299 );
300 css
301}
302
303/// Badges and chips.
304///
305/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
306/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
307/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
308/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
309/// decide which of the two it always was.
310///
311/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
312/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
313/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
314fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
315 let mut css = String::new();
316
317 // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
318 // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
319 let badge = class("badge", opts);
320 let _ = writeln!(
321 css,
322 ".{badge} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
323 Tone::Neutral.token()
324 );
325 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
326 let _ = writeln!(
327 css,
328 ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
329 tone.token()
330 );
331 }
332
333 // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
334 // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
335 // markup and waits for phase B.
336 let chip = class("chip", opts);
337 let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
338 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
339 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip));
340 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
341 &format!("{chip}.latched"),
342 unlatched.depth(true),
343 ));
344 css
345}
346
347/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
348///
349/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
350/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
351/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
352/// three are not one member with a flag.
353///
354/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
355/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
356///
357/// Both states emit as of makeover-layout 0.3.0. Before it the description
358/// named only the chosen option, so an unchosen one fell through to
359/// [`Depth::Flat`] and nothing was drawn for it, which left goingson's tab
360/// strip hand-writing the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
361fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
362 let mut css = String::new();
363 for (selector, name) in [
364 (Selector::Tabs, "tab"),
365 (Selector::Segmented, "segment"),
366 (Selector::Toggle, "toggle"),
367 ] {
368 let c = class(name, opts);
369 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
370 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c));
371 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
372 }
373 css
374}
375
376/// The four parts of a list row.
377fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
378 let mut css = String::new();
379 let row = class("row", opts);
380 for part in [
381 RowPart::Primary,
382 RowPart::Secondary,
383 RowPart::Meta,
384 RowPart::Actions,
385 ] {
386 let name = match part {
387 RowPart::Primary => "row-primary",
388 RowPart::Secondary => "row-secondary",
389 RowPart::Meta => "row-meta",
390 RowPart::Actions => "row-actions",
391 };
392 let c = class(name, opts);
393
394 // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
395 // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
396 // would be louder than saying nothing.
397 if !matches!(part, RowPart::Actions) {
398 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
399 }
400
401 if part.revealed_on_hover() {
402 // Hidden rather than absent: the row must not change height when
403 // the pointer arrives. `focus-within` carries the keyboard, which
404 // hover on its own would lock out.
405 //
406 // Transparent rather than `visibility: hidden`, which was the first
407 // form and defeated the very escape above: a `visibility: hidden`
408 // element is out of the focus order and out of the accessibility
409 // tree, so tabbing could never reach an action and could never
410 // trigger the row's `focus-within`. goingson had reached the same
411 // opacity form independently, on its own comment "always in the DOM
412 // for keyboard and screen readers".
413 //
414 // `pointer-events` rides along because opacity leaves the hit area
415 // behind: without it a renderer with no hover carries an invisible
416 // tappable control. Keyboard focus is unaffected by it.
417 let _ = writeln!(
418 css,
419 ".{c} {{\n opacity: 0;\n pointer-events: none;\n}}"
420 );
421 let _ = writeln!(
422 css,
423 ".{row}:hover .{c},\n.{row}:focus-within .{c} {{\n opacity: 1;\n pointer-events: auto;\n}}"
424 );
425 }
426 }
427 css
428}
429
430/// The progress trough, which has nothing behind it in the description.
431///
432/// Renderer-local chrome, on the same licence the skeletons hold as the
433/// webview's expression of `Readiness::Pending`: a determinate bar is a shape
434/// CSS draws readily and a terminal would rather not be told about. It earns
435/// the place empirically, goingson having grown four independent progress bars
436/// before anything named one.
437///
438/// The trough is a [`Depth::Well`], the same reading a text field gets:
439/// something with its content down inside it.
440fn progress_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
441 let progress = class("progress", opts);
442 // `progress-fill` rather than a bare `fill`: an unprefixed build claims
443 // these names in the app's own stylesheet, and `.fill` is grabby enough to
444 // catch things that have nothing to do with progress. goingson already
445 // calls it `.progress-fill`, so this is also the name that deletes.
446 let fill = class("progress-fill", opts);
447 let mut css = depth_rule(&progress, Depth::Well);
448
449 // The untoned bar is `--action`, not [`Tone::Neutral`]. That is the one
450 // place this differs from the badge rules, and deliberately: a badge with
451 // no status is a muted label, while a bar with no status is still
452 // reporting progress, and `content-muted` would read as disabled.
453 let _ = writeln!(
454 css,
455 ".{progress} > .{fill} {{\n background: var(--action);\n}}"
456 );
457
458 // A bar can be saying something, same as a badge: goingson colours subtask
459 // progress as success and an over-estimate as danger, which is real
460 // information rather than decoration. Emitting the tones is what lets that
461 // survive adoption instead of staying hand-written.
462 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
463 let _ = writeln!(
464 css,
465 ".{progress} > .{fill}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n background: var(--{0});\n}}",
466 tone.token()
467 );
468 }
469 css
470}
471
472/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
473///
474/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
475/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
476/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
477#[must_use]
478pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
479 let mut css = String::new();
480 css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
481 css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
482 css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
483 css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
484 css.push_str(&progress_rules(opts));
485 css
486}
487
488/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, with
489/// a generated-file banner.
490#[must_use]
491pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
492 format!(
493 "/* Generated by makeover-webview from makeover-layout. Do not edit.\n \
494 Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n \
495 them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout. */\n\
496 :root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
497 bevel_properties(opts),
498 depth_rules(opts),
499 component_rules(opts)
500 )
501}
502
503#[cfg(test)]
504mod tests {
505 use super::*;
506 use makeover_layout::Edge;
507
508 #[test]
509 fn the_emitted_bevel_matches_what_the_apps_already_hand_write() {
510 // Balanced Breakfast's styles.css, verbatim. Adoption has to be a
511 // deletion, not a redesign, or nobody will take it.
512 let opts = Emit::default();
513 assert_eq!(
514 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts),
515 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-light), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-dark)"
516 );
517 assert_eq!(
518 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Inset, &opts),
519 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-dark), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-light)"
520 );
521 }
522
523 #[test]
524 fn no_colour_ever_reaches_the_output() {
525 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
526 assert!(!css.contains('#'), "a hex literal escaped into the CSS");
527 assert!(
528 !css.contains("rgb"),
529 "a colour function escaped into the CSS"
530 );
531 // Every colour is named, never resolved.
532 assert!(css.contains("var(--surface-raised)"));
533 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-light)"));
534 }
535
536 #[test]
537 fn a_well_falls_back_through_css_rather_than_through_rust() {
538 assert_eq!(
539 fill_var(Fill::Well),
540 "var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"
541 );
542 // Nothing else needs one.
543 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Raised), "var(--surface-raised)");
544 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Page), "var(--surface-page)");
545 }
546
547 #[test]
548 fn raised_and_well_do_not_collapse_onto_each_other() {
549 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
550 assert!(css.contains(".raised {"));
551 assert!(css.contains(".well {"));
552 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"));
553 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"));
554 }
555
556 #[test]
557 fn the_cascade_carries_the_pressed_state() {
558 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
559 // The one thing this renderer gets free that the other two resolve by
560 // hand, eighteen call sites deep in audiofiles' case.
561 assert!(css.contains(".raised:active {"));
562 }
563
564 #[test]
565 fn pressing_moves_the_fill_and_not_only_the_edge() {
566 // The decision-1 guard, and the regression that mattered: emitting the
567 // bevel flip alone is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
568 // var(--surface-sunken)` on .btn, .card and .tag/.badge alike, so none
569 // of the three could be deleted.
570 let pressed = interactive_rules("button");
571 assert!(pressed.contains(".button:active {"));
572 assert!(
573 pressed.contains("background: var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"),
574 "pressed dropped its fill: {pressed}"
575 );
576 assert!(pressed.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
577 }
578
579 #[test]
580 fn pressed_takes_its_fill_from_the_description_not_from_the_app() {
581 // goingson presses to --surface-sunken. The description says a pressed
582 // raised region reads as a well, and makeover says outright that
583 // surface-sunken cannot serve as one, so the app is the thing that
584 // moves.
585 //
586 // Scoped to the pressed rules rather than to the whole sheet: since
587 // makeover-layout 0.3.0 an unchosen tab is legitimately
588 // --surface-sunken, so the token appearing somewhere in the output no
589 // longer means the app's choice leaked in.
590 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
591 let mut checked = 0;
592 for rule in css.split("}\n") {
593 if !rule.contains(":active") {
594 continue;
595 }
596 checked += 1;
597 assert!(
598 !rule.contains("surface-sunken"),
599 "a pressed rule took the app's fill: {rule}"
600 );
601 }
602 assert!(checked > 0, "no pressed rules found to check");
603 assert_eq!(
604 Depth::Raised.pressed().fill(),
605 Some(Fill::Well),
606 "the description changed under us"
607 );
608 }
609
610 #[test]
611 fn hover_resolves_against_the_token_makeover_already_derives() {
612 let css = interactive_rules("card");
613 assert!(css.contains(".card:hover {"));
614 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--hover-surface)"));
615 // Not the app's choice, which was --surface-overlay.
616 assert!(!css.contains("surface-overlay"));
617 }
618
619 #[test]
620 fn a_badge_gets_no_edge_and_no_fill() {
621 // Decision 2, and the one visible redesign in phase A. Token::Badge is
622 // Flat: an edge on a label says it can be pressed.
623 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
624 let badge = css
625 .lines()
626 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".badge {"))
627 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
628 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
629 .join("\n");
630 assert!(!badge.contains("box-shadow"), "badge kept an edge: {badge}");
631 assert!(!badge.contains("background"), "badge kept a fill: {badge}");
632 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(false), Depth::Flat);
633 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(true), Depth::Flat);
634 }
635
636 #[test]
637 fn a_badge_carries_a_tone_and_neutral_is_the_bare_class() {
638 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
639 // Neutral is the absence of a status, not a status named "none".
640 assert!(css.contains(".badge {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
641 assert!(!css.contains("data-tone=\"content-muted\""));
642 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
643 assert!(
644 css.contains(&format!(".badge[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
645 "missing tone {tone}"
646 );
647 assert!(css.contains(&format!("color: var(--{tone})")));
648 }
649 }
650
651 #[test]
652 fn a_chip_is_raised_and_latches_into_a_well() {
653 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
654 assert!(css.contains(".chip {"));
655 assert!(css.contains(".chip.latched {"));
656 assert!(css.contains(".chip:active {"));
657 // The whole difference from a badge: it answers a click.
658 assert!(Token::Chip { removable: false }.interactive());
659 assert!(!Token::Badge.interactive());
660 }
661
662 #[test]
663 fn only_a_tab_comes_forward_when_chosen() {
664 // The folder semantic. Collapsing the three selectors would lose it.
665 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
666 assert!(css.contains(".tab.chosen {"));
667 assert!(css.contains(".segment.chosen {"));
668 assert!(css.contains(".toggle.chosen {"));
669 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.chosen(), Depth::Raised);
670 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
671 assert_eq!(Selector::Toggle.chosen(), Depth::Well);
672
673 let tab = css
674 .lines()
675 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".tab.chosen {"))
676 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
677 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
678 .join("\n");
679 assert!(tab.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"), "tab was held in: {tab}");
680 }
681
682 #[test]
683 fn an_unchosen_tab_recedes_without_looking_picked() {
684 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
685 // Recessed by colour and given no edge. An edge would make every option
686 // look picked; flat would leave the chosen one nothing to come forward
687 // from, which is the gap makeover-layout 0.3.0 closed.
688 assert!(
689 css.contains(".tab {\n background: var(--surface-sunken);\n}"),
690 "unchosen tab is not recessed: {css}"
691 );
692 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.unchosen(), Depth::Sunken);
693 assert!(css.contains(".tab:hover {"));
694 }
695
696 #[test]
697 fn a_segment_stands_up_so_the_chosen_one_can_be_held_in() {
698 // The inverse of the tab, and why the three selectors are not one
699 // member with a flag.
700 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
701 assert!(css.contains(".segment {\n background: var(--surface-raised);"));
702 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.unchosen(), Depth::Raised);
703 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
704 }
705
706 #[test]
707 fn row_actions_are_revealed_without_moving_the_row() {
708 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
709 assert!(css.contains(".row-actions {\n opacity: 0;"));
710 // Not display:none, which would reflow the row under the pointer.
711 assert!(!css.contains("display: none"));
712 // Hover alone would lock the keyboard out.
713 assert!(css.contains(".row:focus-within .row-actions"));
714 assert!(RowPart::Actions.revealed_on_hover());
715 }
716
717 #[test]
718 fn a_hidden_row_action_is_still_focusable_and_not_tappable() {
719 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
720 // `visibility: hidden` takes the actions out of the focus order, so the
721 // `focus-within` reveal above could never fire from an action itself.
722 assert!(!css.contains("visibility:"));
723 // Opacity leaves the hit area behind; the row must not carry an
724 // invisible tappable control where there is no hover to reveal it.
725 assert!(css.contains(".row-actions {\n opacity: 0;\n pointer-events: none;\n}"));
726 assert!(css.contains("opacity: 1;\n pointer-events: auto;"));
727 }
728
729 #[test]
730 fn the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits() {
731 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
732 assert!(css.contains(".row-primary {\n color: var(--content);"));
733 assert!(css.contains(".row-secondary {\n color: var(--content-secondary);"));
734 assert!(css.contains(".row-meta {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
735 // Actions carry controls, not text. Pinning the colour it would inherit
736 // anyway is louder than saying nothing.
737 assert!(!css.contains(".row-actions {\n color:"));
738 }
739
740 #[test]
741 fn the_progress_trough_is_a_well() {
742 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
743 assert!(css.contains(".progress {"));
744 assert!(css.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
745 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {"));
746 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--action)"));
747 // A bare `.fill` would catch things that have nothing to do with
748 // progress once the sheet lands unprefixed.
749 assert!(!css.contains("> .fill "));
750 }
751
752 #[test]
753 fn a_progress_bar_can_carry_a_tone_and_defaults_to_action() {
754 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
755 // Untoned is --action, not Tone::Neutral's content-muted: a bar with no
756 // status is still reporting progress, and muted would read as disabled.
757 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {\n background: var(--action);"));
758 assert!(!css.contains("progress-fill {\n color: var(--content-muted)"));
759 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
760 assert!(
761 css.contains(&format!(
762 ".progress > .progress-fill[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]"
763 )),
764 "missing progress tone {tone}"
765 );
766 }
767 // goingson's two live cases, which is why the tones are emitted at all.
768 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] {\n background: var(--success);"));
769 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n background: var(--danger);"));
770 }
771
772 #[test]
773 fn no_scrollbar_track_is_emitted() {
774 // Decision 3's negative half. It was on the phase A list and came off;
775 // this is what stops it drifting back in.
776 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
777 assert!(!css.contains("scrollbar"));
778 assert!(!css.contains("::-webkit"));
779 }
780
781 #[test]
782 fn an_invalid_field_is_ringed_without_being_lit() {
783 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
784 assert!(css.contains(".field {"));
785 // The ARIA attribute, not a class: one fact, read by both the visual
786 // and the accessible state, so they cannot drift.
787 assert!(css.contains(".field[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {"));
788 assert!(!css.contains(".field.invalid"));
789 // A flat ring: this edge says "wrong", and a two-tone bevel would have
790 // it say "raised" at the same time.
791 assert!(css.contains("0 0 0 1px var(--danger)"));
792 }
793
794 #[test]
795 fn an_invalid_field_keeps_the_well_underneath_it() {
796 // box-shadow is not additive. A lone ring replaces the bevel and drops
797 // the well out from under the field, which is what this emitted before
798 // 0.5.0 and is the whole reason the rule composes.
799 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
800 let invalid = css
801 .lines()
802 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".field[aria-invalid"))
803 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
804 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
805 .join("\n");
806 assert!(
807 invalid.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"),
808 "the well was dropped: {invalid}"
809 );
810 assert!(invalid.contains("var(--danger)"));
811 }
812
813 #[test]
814 fn button_and_card_come_out_identical_by_construction() {
815 // The duplication phase A deletes. They are the same composition, so
816 // the only honest way to emit both is from one call.
817 let opts = Emit::default();
818 let css = surface_rules(&opts);
819 assert_eq!(
820 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised),
821 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised)
822 );
823 assert!(css.contains(".button {"));
824 assert!(css.contains(".card {"));
825 assert_eq!(
826 interactive_rules("button").replace("button", "card"),
827 interactive_rules("card")
828 );
829 }
830
831 #[test]
832 fn a_prefix_reaches_the_component_classes_too() {
833 let opts = Emit {
834 class_prefix: "mo-",
835 ..Emit::default()
836 };
837 let css = stylesheet(&opts);
838 for name in [
839 "mo-button",
840 "mo-card",
841 "mo-field",
842 "mo-badge",
843 "mo-chip",
844 "mo-tab",
845 "mo-row-primary",
846 "mo-progress",
847 "mo-progress-fill",
848 ] {
849 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}")), "unprefixed: {name}");
850 }
851 // The bare names must be gone entirely, or a prefixed build still
852 // collides with the app's own stylesheet.
853 assert!(!css.contains(".button {"));
854 assert!(!css.contains(".card {"));
855 assert!(!css.contains(".badge {"));
856 }
857
858 #[test]
859 fn the_whole_sheet_still_names_every_colour() {
860 // The crate's founding property, asserted over the component layer and
861 // not only the primitives.
862 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
863 assert!(!css.contains('#'));
864 assert!(!css.contains("rgb"));
865 for line in css.lines() {
866 // Declarations only: a selector or an at-rule can carry a colon of
867 // its own (`:root`, `:hover`) and declares nothing.
868 let declaration = line.strip_prefix(" ").map(str::trim);
869 let Some(Some((_, value))) = declaration.map(|d| d.split_once(": ")) else {
870 continue;
871 };
872 if value.contains("var(--") {
873 continue;
874 }
875 // Everything left has to be a keyword, a number or a
876 // caller-supplied length, never a colour.
877 assert!(
878 value.contains("inset")
879 || matches!(value.trim_end_matches(';'), "0" | "1" | "none" | "auto"),
880 "unrecognised literal value: {line}"
881 );
882 }
883 }
884
885 #[test]
886 fn flat_emits_nothing_at_all() {
887 assert_eq!(depth_class(Depth::Flat, &Emit::default()), None);
888 assert!(!depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("flat"));
889 }
890
891 #[test]
892 fn a_prefix_namespaces_every_class() {
893 let opts = Emit {
894 class_prefix: "mo-",
895 ..Emit::default()
896 };
897 let css = depth_rules(&opts);
898 assert!(css.contains(".mo-raised {"));
899 assert!(css.contains(".mo-well {"));
900 assert!(!css.contains(".raised {"));
901 }
902
903 #[test]
904 fn the_border_width_is_the_callers() {
905 let opts = Emit {
906 border_width: "2px",
907 ..Emit::default()
908 };
909 assert!(bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts).contains("inset 2px 2px 0"));
910 }
911
912 #[test]
913 fn edges_agree_with_the_description() {
914 // Not a tautology: it is the guard that a CSS-shaped convenience never
915 // quietly reverses which side is lit.
916 let (tl, br) = Bevel::Raised.edges();
917 assert_eq!(tl.token(), Edge::Light.token());
918 assert_eq!(br.token(), Edge::Dark.token());
919 }
920}