Skip to main content

makeover_webview/
lib.rs

1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet
19//!
20//! This module emits component CSS and no markup, deliberately. GoingsOn has
21//! 145 `innerHTML` sites and Balanced Breakfast 175 `createElement` sites, so
22//! moving markup is a migration where adopting a generated stylesheet is not.
23//! The apps keep every line of their markup and gain the classes.
24//!
25//! It is not a deletion either, which this header claimed until the measurement
26//! came in. Adoption across goingson removed 49 declarations net and *added* 25
27//! lines: a rule loses its depth declarations and gains a variant selector next
28//! to it, so the file stays the same size. What phase A moves is where depth is
29//! defined, not how much CSS exists. Numbers and method in the wiki note under
30//! "The deletion test, run".
31//!
32//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
33//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
34//!
35//! # Phase B: the markup, one description at a time
36//!
37//! [`form`] renders [`makeover_layout::Field`], which is the half of phase B
38//! whose description is settled. It emits strings, because both apps
39//! interpolate their fields into larger string-built forms and returning nodes
40//! would rewrite those too. It owns its own escaping, on the reasoning in that
41//! module: a Rust encoder can cover element text and attribute values with one
42//! function, where the apps need four and have to choose correctly at every
43//! call site.
44//!
45//! [`facet`] renders `makeover_layout::Facet`: a dimension a set is narrowed by,
46//! and the one phase-B emitter whose markup an app is not keeping, because the
47//! markup it replaces was two mechanisms rather than one. A tag's selection and
48//! a tag's browse position were separate state on MNW's discover page, which is
49//! why every filter row there carries a tick box *and* a chevron; one gesture
50//! doing both is what lets the second one go.
51//!
52//! [`list`] is the other half: column tracks, the narrowing rules, and the cell
53//! containers a row is made of. It stops at the cell boundary and does not
54//! render what goes inside one, on the reasoning in that module. So phase B is
55//! now the frame around content in both directions, and what an app still owns
56//! is the content itself.
57//!
58//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
59//!
60//! Decided 2026-07-29 against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a
61//! component list. The useful finding there was that `.btn` (line 644),
62//! `.card` (768) and `.tag, .badge` (882) each hand-write the same
63//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
64//!
65//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
66//! not be described as a pure deletion:
67//!
68//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
69//!   [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
70//!   will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
71//!   and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
72//!   where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
73//!   hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
74//!   that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
75//!   answer is there and not here.
76//! - **Badges go flat.** See [`token_rules`].
77//!
78//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
79//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
80//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
81//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
82//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
83//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
84//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
85//!
86//! # 0.10.0: the states this crate used to leave to its consumers
87//!
88//! [`interactive_rules`] emitted hover and pressed and stopped, because
89//! `makeover-layout` modelled no interaction state. Focus and disabled were
90//! therefore unsayable, and every app completed the primitive from outside the
91//! only way that works: by out-specifying a rule it does not own. goingson
92//! carries 19 such rules and the MNW server 21, and the three focus rings do
93//! not match each other.
94//!
95//! That also blocked the cascade-layer work outright. An app that declares
96//! `@layer` puts its own rules in a named layer, and unlayered declarations
97//! outrank every named layer regardless of specificity, so all of those
98//! overrides lose in the commit that adopts layers. They cannot simply be
99//! deleted, because they are the only thing supplying the missing states.
100//! Emitting the states here is what turns that adoption into a deletion.
101//!
102//! Four states now, in emission order, and the order is load-bearing: they are
103//! all specificity (0,2,0), so disabled beats hover by coming last and by
104//! nothing else. Nothing here reaches for `:not(:disabled)`, which would raise
105//! a selector this crate will shortly be wrapping in its own layer.
106//!
107//! Hover additionally sits inside a capability query now. `makeover-touch`
108//! answers whether a fingertip has hover and `makeover-geometry` spells the
109//! condition; this crate asks and does not decide. goingson's section 60 exists
110//! solely to take the hover state back on touch, which is a fight it should
111//! never have been handed.
112//!
113//! # 0.11.0: the layer contract
114//!
115//! [`stylesheet`] emits into the `makeover` cascade layer ([`CSS_LAYER`], which
116//! lives in `makeover-geometry` because that is the one crate every CSS emitter
117//! in the family already depends on). `makeover-geometry` 0.6.0 does the same
118//! for `geometry.css`.
119//!
120//! The cascade resolves origin and importance, then layer, then specificity,
121//! then source order, and **unlayered normal declarations outrank every named
122//! layer**. So before this, an app that declared `@layer base, components,
123//! responsive` put every rule it owns into a named layer and lost all of them to
124//! this unlayered file, regardless of specificity and regardless of loading
125//! last. Nothing errors when that happens: the CSS is valid, the minifier is
126//! happy, and buttons and badges look subtly wrong.
127//!
128//! That is why the layer belongs here rather than in each app. An app cannot fix
129//! it from its own stylesheet, because the fix is to layer the file it does not
130//! own.
131//!
132//! **What it flips**, and the reason each app wants a look when it bumps the
133//! pin: a generated rule that currently beats an app rule by being more specific
134//! stops beating it. The direction is always "the app wins", which is what the
135//! apps already assume, but a hand-written rule an app thought was dead can come
136//! back to life.
137//!
138//! An app should declare the order once, or the layer's position is decided by
139//! whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:
140//!
141//! ```css
142//! @layer makeover, base, components, responsive;
143//! ```
144//!
145//! [`in_css_layer`] is re-exported for an app that assembles its own stylesheet
146//! from this crate's pieces. goingson builds `tables.css` in its own `build.rs`
147//! out of [`list::narrowing_css`] and [`list::grid_template_columns`], and those
148//! rules are as generated as the ones here, so they belong in the same layer and
149//! this crate cannot put them there on the app's behalf.
150//!
151//! # 0.12.0: the ring gets its own width
152//!
153//! [`focus_rule`] reused [`Emit::border_width`] and emitted a 1px ring. That was
154//! an implementation convenience dressed as consistency with the invalid-field
155//! ring: a bevel and a focus indicator answer different questions, and only one
156//! of them has to be noticed from across a desk.
157//!
158//! Caught while adopting 0.11.0 into goingson, by the check the adoption tasks
159//! ask for. Every consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose
160//! at least 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
161//! goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve selectors. The
162//! design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px, so deleting the app
163//! rules in favour of it would have thinned the focus indicator everywhere.
164//!
165//! [`Emit::focus_width`] now carries it, defaulting to `2px`, and the offset is
166//! the same magnitude with its sign off the depth. Both values are the measured
167//! consensus rather than a new opinion.
168//!
169//! # 0.54.0: a curve this renderer can carry, and one it cannot
170//!
171//! `makeover-layout` 0.32.0's `Curve`. A range takes its granularity from the
172//! curve now (`Field::curve.step()`), every other kind keeps `Field::step`, and
173//! `Curve::Linear` emits exactly what it emitted before.
174//!
175//! **A constant-ratio curve still emits a linear track, and that is a
176//! shortfall rather than a decision.** HTML has no logarithmic range input, so
177//! honouring one here means either shipping JS that maps the thumb position to
178//! a value -- renderer-side app code, which is the thing this stack exists to
179//! delete -- or changing what the control submits from a value to a fraction,
180//! and then something has to map it on the way back in. That something is not
181//! this crate: the MNW server reads these forms with its own handlers, so a
182//! fraction arriving where a value is expected would be silent. Filed rather
183//! than guessed at.
184//!
185//! What is not lost: the extent, the granularity, and the value's own units.
186//! What is lost is resolution at the small end, which is exactly the reason an
187//! app asked for a ratio in the first place. No consumer is affected today --
188//! every described range on this path is linear.
189//!
190//! # 0.52.0: a markdown field gets the preview it was permitted
191//!
192//! 0.50.0 marked a [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Rich`] field with
193//! `data-format="markdown"` and stopped there, and nothing read the mark: no
194//! rule, no markup, no selector anywhere in the tree. So a described editor was
195//! a plain textarea carrying an attribute, and MNW converting its four
196//! hand-written section editors onto the member would have *lost* the
197//! Write/Preview pair one of them already has. A permission taken and not spent
198//! turns every conversion into a regression.
199//!
200//! [`form::editor_rules`] and the chrome beside it are the spending. The pair is
201//! a segmented control, so it takes the depth, the focus ring and the chosen
202//! state from rules that already existed; the preview pane is a well, because it
203//! stands where the control stood. Both are gated on the attribute rather than
204//! on a class, which is what the attribute was for.
205//!
206//! **This crate still renders no markdown.** The pane arrives empty and is
207//! filled by whatever binds the editor, which is where the host's sanitiser
208//! already is. A converter here would have moved that guarantee into a crate
209//! with no view of the host's content-security posture.
210//!
211//! # 0.47.0: a range, a chooser's ghost text, and an option that cannot be
212//! picked yet
213//!
214//! `makeover-layout` 0.28.0's three form findings, all of them cheap here and
215//! none of them cheap in the app that found them.
216//!
217//! - `FieldKind::Range` emits `<input type="range">`, and `Field::step` emits
218//!   `step`. The step is emitted only when the description carries one: the
219//!   browser's own default is `step="1"`, which is what a description means by
220//!   saying nothing, and is also what turns a 0-to-1 threshold into a
221//!   two-position control.
222//! - A select with nothing chosen emits a disabled, selected, valueless first
223//!   option carrying `Field::placeholder`. HTML has no placeholder attribute on
224//!   `<select>`; this is the idiom, and `required` keeps working through it
225//!   because the option's value is empty.
226//! - `Choice::unavailable` emits `disabled` plus the reason. Where it goes
227//!   differs by control and the difference is forced: a radio group gets a
228//!   `.form-option-reason` span beside the label, and a `<select>` option has
229//!   room for no element at all, so the reason runs into its text.
230//!
231//! # 0.25.0: a cell says what it holds
232//!
233//! 0.23.0 gave a table its layout and left every cell the same. One `.cell`
234//! carried the whole thing, so a cell holding text and a cell holding a button
235//! were one class and one content colour, and a control in a cell was painted
236//! as text. That is the drift [`RowPart::intent`](makeover_layout::RowPart)
237//! has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented for nothing here.
238//!
239//! makeover-layout 0.14.0's [`CellPart`](makeover_layout::CellPart) names the
240//! four things a cell holds, and [`table_rules`] turns them into
241//! `.cell-value`, `.cell-tokens`, `.cell-actions` and `.cell-link`. Only the
242//! first takes a colour: a token carries its own tone, an action is a control
243//! rather than text, and a link takes the action colour from the anchor it is.
244//!
245//! The colour going on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell` is the fix rather
246//! than an implementation detail. On the container it cascades into the parts
247//! that are not text, which is the bug said in one rule.
248//!
249//! [`list::Cell::part`] is `Option<CellPart>` here, where it was
250//! `Option<RowPart>`. A table cell borrowing the list row's vocabulary was the
251//! drift with a type on it: the two answer different questions, and only one of
252//! them was ever about a cell.
253//!
254//! # 0.23.0: a table lays itself out, and a row shows its controls
255//!
256//! Three things a description could say and this renderer had no rule for,
257//! found together by rendering the MNW server's SSH-keys settings tab through
258//! `quasi` and preferring the hand-written Askama original.
259//!
260//! **A table had no layout at all.** [`list::narrowing_css`] emits the track
261//! list, and it has to be called with the columns, so it works where the
262//! columns are known at build time: goingson builds `tables.css` in its own
263//! `build.rs` and is untouched. A table a description produced knows its
264//! columns at render time, and the rules would have had to travel with the
265//! markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs `style-src
266//! 'unsafe-inline'` that the MNW server is working to drop, or the head, which
267//! an htmx fragment swap does not carry. [`table_rules`] lays a table out with
268//! `display: table` instead, which aligns columns across rows knowing nothing
269//! about how many there are. [`Priority`](makeover_layout::Priority) hiding
270//! moves from a generated rule per dropped column to one rule per drop class,
271//! and [`list::column_classes`] is what puts those classes on a cell. A header
272//! row emitted by a renderer's own code should call it too, or the header and
273//! the body disagree about which column just dropped.
274//!
275//! **A destructive button had nowhere for its tone to land.** `.button` carried
276//! no tone, on the reading that a control's colour is its surface. Every
277//! consumer had written the danger rule itself. It joins the badge in taking
278//! the four tones as colour, off `data-tone`.
279//!
280//! **A list rendered as a bulleted list**, because nothing here reset the `ul`
281//! a renderer emits for one.
282//!
283//! `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` also stops being honoured, which its own doc
284//! sanctioned: a renderer decides. It was retired outright in makeover-layout
285//! 0.13.0, once this had been its only consumer for a release. The rule hid a
286//! row's actions until hover,
287//! and every escape it grew was a report that hiding was wrong for somebody:
288//! `focus-within` for the keyboard, the capability gate for a fingertip with no
289//! way to unhide. What survived hid the controls from pointer users alone, who
290//! are the ones scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
291//!
292//! # 0.17.0: the depth classes stop being controls
293//!
294//! [`depth_rules`] gave `.raised` the whole interactive set. A depth is a
295//! statement about shape, so that left the vocabulary with no raised surface
296//! that is merely an object, and an app wanting one had two moves: write its
297//! own class from tokens, or take a control class and cancel the control half.
298//! goingson took the second, in three variants over sixteen elements
299//! (`.card--static` at 14 call sites, `.card--muted` at 2, `.card--shell` at 1),
300//! each re-asserting the resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`.
301//!
302//! Measured before changing it: `.raised` is emitted into goingson, Balanced
303//! Breakfast and the MNW server, and none of the three has a single call site.
304//! The states were unasked-for everywhere at once, and dropping them costs no
305//! migration anywhere.
306//!
307//! `.card` and `.button` are unchanged. They are the same depth *and* controls,
308//! and they take their states from [`surface_rules`], which is where a state
309//! belongs: on the thing that claims to answer a pointer.
310//!
311//! # Substitution, three ways
312//!
313//! `Fill::Well` has no colour on makeover before 2.3.0, and each renderer
314//! answers that differently, which is the evidence that dropping
315//! `Fill::fallback` from the description was right:
316//!
317//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
318//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
319//!   terminal would quantise the two together.
320//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
321//!   var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
322//!   decides anything.
323
324#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
325
326pub mod facet;
327pub mod figure;
328pub mod form;
329pub mod list;
330pub mod meter;
331pub mod placeholder;
332pub mod vocabulary;
333
334use crate::list::{cell_part_class, part_class};
335use makeover_geometry::{Density, SizeClass};
336// Re-exported rather than redefined. An app assembling its own stylesheet out
337// of this crate's pieces needs the same layer name, and most such apps depend
338// on this crate and not on `makeover-geometry` directly: goingson builds
339// `tables.css` in its own build.rs from [`list::narrowing_css`], and those
340// rules are as generated as the ones here.
341pub use makeover_geometry::{CSS_LAYER, in_css_layer};
342use makeover_layout::{
343    Bevel, CellPart, Depth, Fallback, Fill, Flow, Intent, RowPart, Selector, Sort, State, Token,
344    Tone,
345};
346use makeover_touch::Affordance;
347use std::fmt::Write as _;
348
349/// How the emitted CSS is shaped.
350#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
351pub struct Emit {
352    /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
353    ///
354    /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: border widths belong to
355    /// `makeover-geometry` and will come from there once it carries them.
356    pub border_width: &'static str,
357    /// Focus ring thickness, as a CSS length.
358    ///
359    /// Separate from [`border_width`](Self::border_width), which it reused
360    /// until 0.12.0. That reuse was an implementation convenience dressed as
361    /// consistency, and it emitted a 1px ring: a bevel and a focus indicator
362    /// are answering different questions, and only one of them has to be
363    /// noticed from across a desk.
364    ///
365    /// The default is the measured consensus rather than a new opinion. Every
366    /// consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose at least
367    /// 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
368    /// goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve
369    /// selectors. The design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px.
370    pub focus_width: &'static str,
371    /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
372    pub class_prefix: &'static str,
373}
374
375impl Default for Emit {
376    fn default() -> Self {
377        Self {
378            border_width: "1px",
379            focus_width: "2px",
380            class_prefix: "",
381        }
382    }
383}
384
385/// A string as CSS escapes, for a `content` value.
386///
387/// `\u{25B2}` becomes `\25B2`. Emitted escaped rather than literally so the
388/// stylesheet is ASCII whatever the description spells: a `content` string is
389/// read by whatever encoding the consumer serves the file as, and a caret that
390/// depends on that is a caret that works on one machine.
391///
392/// Terminated by the closing quote at every site here. A CSS hex escape takes
393/// up to six digits and ends at the first character that cannot be one, so an
394/// escape followed by more text would need a space that these do not.
395fn css_escape(text: &str) -> String {
396    text.chars().fold(String::new(), |mut out, c| {
397        let _ = write!(out, "\\{:X}", c as u32);
398        out
399    })
400}
401
402/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
403#[must_use]
404pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
405    match bevel {
406        Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
407        Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
408    }
409}
410
411/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
412/// the intent may be absent.
413///
414/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
415/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
416#[must_use]
417pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
418    match fill {
419        Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
420        other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
421    }
422}
423
424/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
425///
426/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
427/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
428/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
429/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
430#[must_use]
431pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
432    let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
433    let w = opts.border_width;
434    format!(
435        "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} -{w} 0 var(--{})",
436        top_left.token(),
437        bottom_right.token()
438    )
439}
440
441/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
442///
443/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
444/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
445/// without the fill reads the property directly.
446#[must_use]
447pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
448    let mut css = String::new();
449    for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset] {
450        let _ = writeln!(
451            css,
452            "    {}: {};",
453            bevel_var(bevel),
454            bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
455        );
456    }
457    css.push_str(ELEVATION_PROPERTY);
458    css
459}
460
461/// The cast shadow of a surface that floats over the page.
462///
463/// Composed here for the reason the bevel pair is: `makeover` derives the tone,
464/// this crate owns the geometry, and neither has to know the other's numbers.
465///
466/// **Only for a surface that overlays the page.** A menu, a toast, a popover, a
467/// dropdown. A surface *in* the page takes `.raised` and its bevel, and a rule
468/// that reaches for this on a card or a plate has renamed a literal rather than
469/// replaced it.
470///
471/// Two lengths rather than one, because a single blur reads as a smudge at
472/// plate size and as a halo at menu size. The offset is small and downward: a
473/// Platinum-era menu sits just off the page rather than hovering above it.
474const ELEVATION_PROPERTY: &str =
475    "    --elevation-overlay: 0 2px 4px var(--elevation), 0 8px 24px var(--elevation);\n";
476
477/// The class name for a depth.
478#[must_use]
479pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
480    let name = match depth {
481        Depth::Flat => return None,
482        Depth::Raised => "raised",
483        Depth::Well => "well",
484        Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
485        // A depth added to the description since this renderer was last
486        // built. No class, on the same footing as Flat: emitting a name
487        // whose rule body we cannot write would put a class in the markup
488        // that the stylesheet never defines.
489        _ => return None,
490    };
491    Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
492}
493
494/// A prefixed class name.
495///
496/// Public since 0.27.0, for the renderers that emit markup this crate does not.
497/// A screen renderer writing `class="row"` has to prefix it the way the
498/// stylesheet half does or a prefixed app gets rules matching everything except
499/// the elements that renderer wrote, and the failure is invisible: the CSS
500/// stays valid and one element is unstyled. quasi-webview carried a byte
501/// identical copy of this function until it could call this one.
502#[must_use]
503pub fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
504    let mut out = String::with_capacity(opts.class_prefix.len() + name.len());
505    push_class(&mut out, name, opts);
506    out
507}
508
509/// A prefixed class name, written into a buffer the caller already has.
510///
511/// The form the emitters use, and the reason it exists is [`escape_into`]'s:
512/// every class on every element went through a `format!` before 0.40.0,
513/// including the default case where the prefix is empty and the answer is the
514/// argument. A described table row carried roughly eighty transient
515/// allocations, and this and the escaper were most of them.
516///
517/// [`class`] stays for callers holding a name rather than a buffer.
518///
519/// [`escape_into`]: crate::form::escape_into
520pub fn push_class(out: &mut String, name: &str, opts: &Emit) {
521    out.push_str(opts.class_prefix);
522    out.push_str(name);
523}
524
525/// The class an option of a selector carries, which is what the rules key off.
526///
527/// Named for the option and not for the group: [`selector_rules`] styles the
528/// thing that gets picked, so `Selector::Tabs` is `tab` and not `tabs`. The
529/// distinction is not pedantry. quasi-webview spelled these `tabs`, `segmented`
530/// and `option`, put `toggle` on the wrapping element rather than on the
531/// buttons inside it, and every described selector in that renderer came out
532/// with no depth, no focus ring and no chosen state, while the toggle group got
533/// a bevel meant for its buttons.
534///
535/// The chosen option additionally carries `chosen`, the same way a latched chip
536/// carries `latched`. That name is this crate's too; there is no reason for a
537/// caller to spell it, and [`selector_rules`] is where it is written down.
538#[must_use]
539pub fn option_class(selector: Selector) -> &'static str {
540    match selector {
541        Selector::Tabs => "tab",
542        Selector::Segmented => "segment",
543        Selector::Toggle => "toggle",
544    }
545}
546
547/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
548///
549/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
550/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
551/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
552/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
553///
554/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
555/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both, which this did before makeover-layout
556/// 0.3.0, silently dropped the fill for exactly that case. Independent does not
557/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
558/// disagree about what the region is.
559#[must_use]
560pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
561    let mut css = String::new();
562    if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
563        let _ = writeln!(css, "    background: {};", fill_var(fill));
564    }
565    if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
566        let _ = writeln!(css, "    box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
567    }
568    css
569}
570
571/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
572/// nothing.
573#[must_use]
574pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
575    let body = depth_declarations(depth);
576    if body.is_empty() {
577        return String::new();
578    }
579    format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
580}
581
582/// The media condition a hover rule has to sit inside, or `None` if hover is
583/// unconditional.
584///
585/// Two crates answer this and neither answer is made here. `makeover-touch`
586/// owns *whether* hover exists at a density, and `makeover-geometry` owns how
587/// that capability is spelled as a media condition. Asking both is what stops
588/// this renderer minting a third opinion, which is what all three apps did:
589/// goingson sniffed the user agent, Balanced Breakfast used `(hover: none)`
590/// alone, and the MNW server had no gate at all.
591///
592/// [`SizeClass`] is required by [`Affordance::available`] and ignored by this
593/// member, which reports as much through `reads_size`. Passing Compact is not
594/// a claim about width; the test below pins that every class agrees.
595fn hover_condition() -> Option<&'static str> {
596    if Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact) {
597        // A fingertip grew a hover state. Nothing to gate, and this renderer
598        // should not invent a reason to gate anyway.
599        None
600    } else {
601        Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition())
602    }
603}
604
605/// Put a rule inside a media query, or leave it alone.
606fn gated(condition: Option<&str>, rule: &str) -> String {
607    let Some(condition) = condition else {
608        return rule.to_string();
609    };
610    let mut css = format!("@media {condition} {{\n");
611    for line in rule.lines() {
612        // Blank lines stay blank. Indenting one leaves trailing whitespace,
613        // which is the sort of thing a formatter later reverts and calls a diff.
614        if line.is_empty() {
615            css.push('\n');
616        } else {
617            let _ = writeln!(css, "    {line}");
618        }
619    }
620    css.push_str("}\n");
621    css
622}
623
624/// The keyboard focus ring, placed by the depth it lands on.
625///
626/// This is the webview's **focus ring** and nothing more. **Reach** and
627/// **focus** are both the browser's — the document decides what is reachable
628/// and `:focus-visible` decides which reached thing wears the ring — and no
629/// description states either. The three terms are defined once in
630/// `makeover_layout`'s crate header, "Reach, focus and the focus ring".
631///
632/// One ring for the whole system, because a focus ring's job is to be
633/// recognised and three apps having three of them is the failure. What varies
634/// is where it sits, and that comes off [`Depth`] rather than off a per-
635/// component choice: a well takes the ring inside its own edge, and anything
636/// standing proud of the page takes it outside.
637///
638/// `outline` rather than the composed `box-shadow` the invalid-field ring at
639/// [`field_rules`] uses, and deliberately the one place the two rings are built
640/// differently. A `box-shadow` ring has to restate the bevel beside it, because
641/// `box-shadow` is not additive and a lone ring silently drops the well out
642/// from under the element. That restatement is a second copy of the depth,
643/// living in a different function from the first, and it is exactly the
644/// duplication `Depth` exists to prevent. `outline` occupies its own property,
645/// so the bevel survives untouched and there is nothing to keep in agreement.
646/// They render the same: both are a flush ring one border-width wide.
647#[must_use]
648pub fn focus_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
649    let w = opts.focus_width;
650    // Same magnitude either way, and only the sign comes off the depth. Both
651    // values are what the consumers had already converged on independently:
652    // 2px out is what all three wrote, and 2px in is the MNW server's own
653    // answer for the one inset ring it had.
654    let offset = match depth.bevel() {
655        // Inside the well, clear of its edge rather than painted over it.
656        Some(Bevel::Inset) => format!("calc(-1 * {w})"),
657        // Raised, or no edge at all. Outside, standing off by its own width.
658        _ => w.to_string(),
659    };
660    // The token by name. It is `makeover`'s, derived from the action colour,
661    // and reaching it through a description member was a second path to the
662    // same variable for as long as one existed.
663    format!(
664        ".{selector}:focus-visible {{\n    outline: {w} solid var(--focus-ring);\n    outline-offset: {offset};\n}}\n"
665    )
666}
667
668/// Present, visible, and not answering.
669///
670/// Matches the ARIA attribute as well as the pseudo-class, because `:disabled`
671/// only matches form elements and half the things this crate emits are not
672/// one: a `div` carrying `.chip` or `.tab` can never be `:disabled`. Keying on
673/// the accessible state is the pattern [`field_rules`] already establishes for
674/// `aria-invalid`, on the reasoning that one fact read by both the styling and
675/// the accessibility tree cannot drift from itself.
676///
677/// The rest depth is re-asserted rather than assumed, because this rule has to
678/// beat the hover and pressed rules above it. It does that on source order at
679/// equal specificity, not by out-specifying them: every rule this function's
680/// caller emits is (0,2,0), and adding a `:not(:disabled)` anywhere would raise
681/// one of them and have to be unpicked when this output moves inside its own
682/// cascade layer.
683#[must_use]
684pub fn disabled_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
685    format!(
686        ".{selector}:disabled,\n.{selector}[aria-disabled=\"true\"] {{\n{}    color: var(--{});\n    cursor: not-allowed;\n}}\n",
687        depth_declarations(depth),
688        State::Disabled.token()
689    )
690}
691
692/// Every state a selector that answers a click implies: hover, pressed, focus
693/// and disabled, in that order.
694///
695/// Order is the whole cascade mechanism here. All four selectors are
696/// specificity (0,2,0), so disabled wins over hover and pressed by coming last
697/// and by nothing else.
698///
699/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
700/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
701/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
702/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
703/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
704/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
705///
706/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
707/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
708/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
709/// consumed until now. What it *is* gated on is capability, via
710/// [`hover_condition`]. Before that gate existed the apps each wrote their own:
711/// goingson's section 60 exists solely to take back the hover state this
712/// function had just handed it, by out-specifying a rule it does not own.
713///
714/// `depth` is the selector's **rest** depth, used to place the focus ring and
715/// to restore the surface under a disabled control. The pressed rule keeps
716/// inverting from [`Depth::Raised`] regardless, which is what every caller got
717/// before this parameter existed: a tab's unchosen depth is
718/// [`Depth::Sunken`], and `Sunken.pressed()` is `Sunken`, so deriving the press
719/// from the rest depth would leave a tab with no press at all.
720#[must_use]
721pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
722    let mut css = gated(
723        hover_condition(),
724        &format!(".{selector}:hover {{\n    background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n"),
725    );
726    css.push_str(&depth_rule(
727        &format!("{selector}:active"),
728        Depth::Raised.pressed(),
729    ));
730    css.push_str(&focus_rule(selector, depth, opts));
731    css.push_str(&disabled_rule(selector, depth));
732    css
733}
734
735/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
736///
737/// A depth and nothing else. `.raised` says a surface sits on what is behind
738/// it, which is a statement about the shape and not about what happens when a
739/// pointer arrives, so it emits no hover, press, focus or disabled rule. The
740/// named surfaces are where interaction lives: `.card` and `.button` are the
741/// same depth *and* controls, and they get their states from
742/// [`surface_rules`].
743///
744/// This class carried the interactive set until 0.17.0, which left the
745/// vocabulary with no raised surface that is merely an object. Consumers that
746/// needed one took a control class and cancelled half of it instead: sixteen
747/// elements in goingson across three `.card--*` variants, each re-asserting the
748/// resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`. Nothing anywhere used
749/// `.raised` itself, so the states were unasked-for in every consumer at once.
750#[must_use]
751pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
752    let mut css = String::new();
753    for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
754        let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
755            continue;
756        };
757        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
758    }
759    css
760}
761
762/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
763///
764/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
765/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
766/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
767/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
768/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
769/// drifting apart again.
770fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
771    let mut css = String::new();
772    for name in ["button", "card"] {
773        let c = class(name, opts);
774        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, Depth::Raised));
775        css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, Depth::Raised, opts));
776    }
777
778    let field = class("field", opts);
779    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
780
781    // A field takes focus and refuses input like everything else here, and got
782    // neither until now, which is why all three apps hand-write a focus ring
783    // for it and no two of them match. No hover or pressed: a text field does
784    // not light up under the pointer and does not invert when clicked, so the
785    // two states `interactive_rules` would add are the two it does not have.
786    css.push_str(&focus_rule(&field, Depth::Well, opts));
787    css.push_str(&disabled_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
788
789    // Keyed on the ARIA attribute rather than on a class, so the visual state
790    // and the accessible state cannot drift apart: there is one fact and both
791    // read it. goingson already drove its invalid styling this way and was
792    // right to; the `.invalid` class this emitted before 0.5.0 was a second
793    // place to forget.
794    //
795    // The ring composes *after* the bevel rather than replacing it. box-shadow
796    // is not additive, so a lone ring silently dropped the well out from under
797    // an invalid field. Flat and unlit: this edge is saying "wrong", and
798    // lighting one side would have it say "raised" at the same time.
799    let _ = writeln!(
800        css,
801        ".{field}[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {{\n    box-shadow: var({}), 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
802        bevel_var(Bevel::Inset),
803        opts.border_width
804    );
805    css
806}
807
808/// Badges and chips.
809///
810/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
811/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
812/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
813/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
814/// decide which of the two it always was.
815///
816/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
817/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
818/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
819/// Text that goes somewhere.
820///
821/// The one inline control, and the vocabulary had no word for it until a
822/// description layer needed one. A table cell has carried `cell-link` since
823/// 0.14.0's part list, deliberately unruled because the cell's own rule covers
824/// it; what was missing is the same thing outside a table, which is what a
825/// described run holds when a sentence contains a link.
826///
827/// Colour and underline only. Whether a link is inline in a sentence or sitting
828/// on its own line is the app's layout, and how much room it takes is
829/// `makeover-geometry`'s. What is here is the pair of signals that say "this
830/// goes somewhere" and nothing that says where it sits.
831///
832/// The visited arm is deliberately absent. A link inside an app points at the
833/// app's own screens, which the user is expected to have been to, so painting
834/// them differently marks almost everything and distinguishes nothing.
835fn link_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
836    let mut css = String::new();
837    let link = class("link", opts);
838
839    let _ = writeln!(
840        css,
841        ".{link} {{\n    color: var(--action);\n    \
842         text-decoration: underline;\n}}"
843    );
844    // The hover step is the same one every other control takes, and it is a
845    // colour rather than a surface: a link has no box to raise.
846    let _ = writeln!(
847        css,
848        "@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine) {{\n    .{link}:hover \
849         {{\n        color: var(--action-hover);\n    }}\n}}"
850    );
851    let _ = writeln!(
852        css,
853        ".{link}:focus-visible {{\n    outline: {} solid var(--focus-ring);\n    \
854         outline-offset: 2px;\n}}",
855        opts.focus_width
856    );
857    // A link is often a `<button>` rather than an `<a>`: a renderer picks the
858    // element from the method, so a link that writes is a button that has to
859    // stop looking like one.
860    let _ = writeln!(
861        css,
862        "button.{link} {{\n    background: none;\n    border: none;\n    \
863         padding: 0;\n    font: inherit;\n    cursor: pointer;\n}}"
864    );
865    css
866}
867
868fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
869    let mut css = String::new();
870
871    // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
872    // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
873    let badge = class("badge", opts);
874    let _ = writeln!(
875        css,
876        ".{badge} {{\n    color: var(--{});\n}}",
877        Tone::Neutral.token()
878    );
879    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
880        let _ = writeln!(
881            css,
882            ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
883            tone.token()
884        );
885    }
886
887    // A button carries the four tones a badge does. It had none, on the reading
888    // that a control's colour is its surface rather than its text, and that
889    // reading has one hole big enough to matter: the button that destroys
890    // something. Every consumer had written that rule itself, and a description
891    // that says `Tone::Danger` on an act had nowhere for it to land.
892    //
893    // Colour and not a fill, matching the badge. A red surface is a decision
894    // about emphasis that belongs to an app's own layer, and two of them
895    // fighting is worse than neither.
896    let button = class("button", opts);
897    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
898        let _ = writeln!(
899            css,
900            ".{button}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
901            tone.token()
902        );
903    }
904
905    // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
906    // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
907    // markup and waits for phase B.
908    let chip = class("chip", opts);
909    let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
910    css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
911    css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip, unlatched.depth(false), opts));
912    css.push_str(&depth_rule(
913        &format!("{chip}.latched"),
914        unlatched.depth(true),
915    ));
916    css
917}
918
919/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
920///
921/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
922/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
923/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
924/// three are not one member with a flag.
925///
926/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
927/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
928///
929/// Both states emit as of makeover-layout 0.3.0. Before it the description
930/// named only the chosen option, so an unchosen one fell through to
931/// [`Depth::Flat`] and nothing was drawn for it, which left goingson's tab
932/// strip hand-writing the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
933fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
934    let mut css = String::new();
935    for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
936        let c = class(option_class(selector), opts);
937        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
938        css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, selector.unchosen(), opts));
939        css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
940    }
941    css
942}
943
944/// The parts of a list row.
945///
946/// The list is written out rather than derived because `RowPart` is
947/// `#[non_exhaustive]` as of makeover-layout 0.9.0, so there is nothing to
948/// iterate. A member added upstream emits no rule until it is named here, which
949/// is the trade `non_exhaustive` makes: a silent gap instead of a build break.
950/// [`part_class`] carries the same list and the same obligation.
951fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
952    let mut css = String::new();
953
954    // The container the rows sit in. Three zeroes and a keyword, all of them
955    // undoing a browser default the description never asked for: a described
956    // list of SSH keys is not a bulleted list, and it rendered as one because
957    // nothing here said otherwise. Not a size: there is no magnitude in it,
958    // which is the line this crate holds.
959    let _ = writeln!(
960        css,
961        ".{} {{\n    list-style: none;\n    margin: 0;\n    padding: 0;\n}}",
962        class("list", opts)
963    );
964
965    for part in [
966        RowPart::Primary,
967        RowPart::Secondary,
968        RowPart::Meta,
969        RowPart::Actions,
970        RowPart::Tokens,
971        RowPart::Proportion,
972    ] {
973        let c = class(part_class(part), opts);
974
975        // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
976        // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
977        // would be louder than saying nothing. Tokens answer alike, for their
978        // own reason: each token carries its own tone, and a colour on the
979        // strip would fight the things sitting in it. A proportion is the same
980        // case again: the meter inside carries the tone.
981        if !matches!(
982            part,
983            RowPart::Actions | RowPart::Tokens | RowPart::Proportion
984        ) {
985            let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n    color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
986        }
987
988        // A row's actions are shown at rest. `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` said
989        // otherwise and was not honoured here from 0.23.0; makeover-layout
990        // 0.13.0 retired the method, so there is no longer a description saying
991        // one thing and a renderer doing another.
992        //
993        // The rule was `opacity: 0` gated to pointer devices, revealed on
994        // `:hover` and on `:focus-within`. Each escape it needed was a report
995        // that hiding was wrong for somebody: `focus-within` because tabbing
996        // could never reach an action; the gate because a fingertip had no way
997        // to unhide, which both webview apps had already hand-written
998        // `opacity: 1` to undo. What was left was a control hidden from
999        // exactly one group: people using a pointer, who are also the group
1000        // scanning a list to find out what can be done to a row.
1001        //
1002        // A settings screen is where that reads worst: the whole reason to be
1003        // on it is to remove a key, and the button doing so was invisible
1004        // until pointed at. A table cell's actions were never hidden, so the
1005        // two arrangements now agree.
1006    }
1007
1008    // A part that may take two lines. `Flow::Tight` gets no rule: one line is
1009    // what a run already does, and restating it here would put a declaration on
1010    // every part in every row to say nothing.
1011    //
1012    // This is the shape both webview apps had already written by hand and
1013    // commented -- Balanced Breakfast on a feed row's title, goingson on a
1014    // problem's body -- which is the whole argument for the description
1015    // carrying it. `-webkit-` prefixed and unprefixed together: the prefixed
1016    // trio is what every engine actually implements, and `line-clamp` is the
1017    // standard property landing behind it.
1018    let _ = writeln!(
1019        css,
1020        ".{} {{\n    display: -webkit-box;\n    -webkit-box-orient: vertical;\n    -webkit-line-clamp: {lines};\n    line-clamp: {lines};\n    overflow: hidden;\n}}",
1021        class("row-relaxed", opts),
1022        lines = Flow::Relaxed.lines()
1023    );
1024
1025    css
1026}
1027
1028/// A row of things that share their space, and what each fallback gets here.
1029///
1030/// Ruling: wiki `layout-room-and-fallback`, Max 2026-08-18. The bug it answers
1031/// is goingson's `styles.css:702`, which pinned every `.page-header` over the
1032/// pill strip with `position: absolute` and so took the toolbar out of flow:
1033/// zero width contributed to the row it shared, nothing able to collide with
1034/// it, and therefore nothing preventing the collision. Rule 1 of the ruling is
1035/// that every described member is in flow, and these rules are how that is kept
1036/// rather than asked for.
1037///
1038/// # The floor, which is most of the fix
1039///
1040/// `.run > *` gets `min-width: min-content`. That is the derived minimum the
1041/// ruling asks for, in this renderer's own unit and stated by the browser
1042/// rather than by anybody: a member cannot be squeezed narrower than what is
1043/// in it, so members in one flow push each other instead of overlapping. It
1044/// costs no query and no number, and it is what fixes all four measured widths
1045/// whichever fallback the group declared.
1046///
1047/// # What each fallback gets, exactly
1048///
1049/// [`Fallback::Wrap`] is `flex-wrap: wrap`, which is exact. The browser wraps
1050/// the run when the members no longer fit, deciding that from their own
1051/// intrinsic widths, which is the derived minimum doing the whole job.
1052///
1053/// [`Fallback::Stack`] is wrap plus `flex: 1 1 max-content` on the members, so
1054/// a member that cannot sit beside its sibling takes a line of its own and
1055/// fills it. For the two-member run this was ruled on -- a tab strip and a
1056/// band -- that is precisely "a row becomes a column".
1057///
1058/// [`Fallback::Shed`] and [`Fallback::Menu`] get wrap, and this renderer is
1059/// honouring less than the description says. **CSS cannot express either one
1060/// without breaking the ruling's own first constraint.** Both need to know that
1061/// the run is out of room in order to take a member out of it, a container
1062/// query is the only construct that can ask, and `@container` compares against
1063/// a `<length>` -- there is no `@container (inline-size < min-content)`. So
1064/// every honest spelling of Shed here needs an authored breakpoint, which is
1065/// the thing the ruling exists to forbid, and the dishonest ones are worse: a
1066/// clamped height clips by document order rather than by [`Priority`], and
1067/// `display: none` under a viewport `@media` is the `nth-child(n+5)` bug the
1068/// vocabulary replaced.
1069///
1070/// Wrapping is the right thing to do instead. It keeps every member reachable,
1071/// which is the property that was actually broken -- goingson's new-contact
1072/// button left the viewport entirely at 560 -- and it keeps rule 1. A renderer
1073/// answering with less than was described is precedented and deliberate here:
1074/// [`makeover_layout::Region::Columns`] says a terminal stacking a board's
1075/// columns is honouring the description rather than degrading it.
1076///
1077/// The real mechanism needs the shed members to have somewhere to go, which is
1078/// markup and belongs to quasi-webview: an overflow control is a member of the
1079/// run, and the description does not yet say that a member *is* one. Filed
1080/// rather than guessed at.
1081fn run_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1082    let run = class("run", opts);
1083    let mut css = String::new();
1084
1085    // `flex-wrap: nowrap` is stated rather than left to the default, because
1086    // the fallbacks below are read as overrides of this line and a reader
1087    // should not have to know which way flexbox leans to see that.
1088    //
1089    // No gap. Spacing between members is the app's, the same way this crate
1090    // states no margins anywhere else; a gap here would be a size, and the one
1091    // hardcoded size in the mechanism is makeover-geometry's contact patch.
1092    let _ = writeln!(
1093        css,
1094        ".{run} {{\n    display: flex;\n    flex-wrap: nowrap;\n    align-items: center;\n}}"
1095    );
1096
1097    // The derived minimum, and the whole reason a member can no longer be
1098    // overlapped. `min-width: auto` is flexbox's default for a flex item and is
1099    // *not* the same thing: auto lets an item be compressed below its content
1100    // in a nowrap run, which is how a toolbar ends up drawn over a tab strip
1101    // even without anything leaving the flow.
1102    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{run} > * {{\n    min-width: min-content;\n}}");
1103
1104    for fallback in [
1105        Fallback::Wrap,
1106        Fallback::Stack,
1107        Fallback::Shed,
1108        Fallback::Menu,
1109    ] {
1110        let name = fallback_class(fallback);
1111        let c = class(name, opts);
1112        let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n    flex-wrap: wrap;\n}}");
1113        if matches!(fallback, Fallback::Stack) {
1114            let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} > * {{\n    flex: 1 1 max-content;\n}}");
1115        }
1116    }
1117
1118    css
1119}
1120
1121/// Every class [`fallback_class`] can return, plus the run itself.
1122///
1123/// [`ROW_PART_CLASSES`](crate::list::ROW_PART_CLASSES)'s reasoning and the same
1124/// obligation: a `match` over a `#[non_exhaustive]` enum cannot be enumerated
1125/// from outside, so the list sits beside it and a test holds the two together.
1126/// `run` is in it because it is emitted in its own right rather than only as a
1127/// fallback's fallback.
1128pub const RUN_CLASSES: &[&str] = &["run", "run-wrap", "run-stack", "run-shed", "run-menu"];
1129
1130/// The class a run carries for what it does when it is tight.
1131///
1132/// A run always carries `.run` as well, so an unrecognised fallback -- the enum
1133/// is `#[non_exhaustive]` -- lands as a plain nowrap row with the min-content
1134/// floor still under it. That is the safe failure: every member in flow and
1135/// none overlapped, which is the property, with only the rearrangement missing.
1136#[must_use]
1137pub fn fallback_class(fallback: Fallback) -> &'static str {
1138    match fallback {
1139        Fallback::Wrap => "run-wrap",
1140        Fallback::Stack => "run-stack",
1141        Fallback::Shed => "run-shed",
1142        Fallback::Menu => "run-menu",
1143        _ => "run",
1144    }
1145}
1146
1147/// The progress trough these rules fill.
1148///
1149/// This was renderer-local chrome with nothing behind it until makeover-layout
1150/// 0.10.0, which is the unusual order: the tones below were emitted for every
1151/// bar in the tree while the only way to describe one was to concatenate the
1152/// numbers into a heading. `Meter` is the word that arrived late, and
1153/// [`meter::meter_html`](crate::meter::meter_html) is what now fills these.
1154///
1155/// The rules stay a superset of what a description can ask for. An app drawing
1156/// its own bar keeps these classes, which is what the four goingson grew
1157/// independently were adopted onto.
1158///
1159/// The trough is a [`Depth::Well`], the same reading a text field gets:
1160/// something with its content down inside it.
1161fn progress_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1162    let progress = class("progress", opts);
1163    // `progress-fill` rather than a bare `fill`: an unprefixed build claims
1164    // these names in the app's own stylesheet, and `.fill` is grabby enough to
1165    // catch things that have nothing to do with progress. goingson already
1166    // calls it `.progress-fill`, so this is also the name that deletes.
1167    let fill = class("progress-fill", opts);
1168    let mut css = depth_rule(&progress, Depth::Well);
1169
1170    // The untoned bar is `--action`, not [`Tone::Neutral`]. That is the one
1171    // place this differs from the badge rules, and deliberately: a badge with
1172    // no status is a muted label, while a bar with no status is still
1173    // reporting progress, and `content-muted` would read as disabled.
1174    let _ = writeln!(
1175        css,
1176        ".{progress} > .{fill} {{\n    background: var(--action);\n}}"
1177    );
1178
1179    // A bar can be saying something, same as a badge: goingson colours subtask
1180    // progress as success and an over-estimate as danger, which is real
1181    // information rather than decoration. Emitting the tones is what lets that
1182    // survive adoption instead of staying hand-written.
1183    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1184        let _ = writeln!(
1185            css,
1186            ".{progress} > .{fill}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n    background: var(--{0});\n}}",
1187            tone.token()
1188        );
1189    }
1190    css
1191}
1192
1193/// A strip of figures, and the two spans inside each one.
1194///
1195/// Colour only, which is the deferral rule applied to a component that badly
1196/// wants to break it. A figure reads as a figure because the value is set large
1197/// over a small caption, and that is a size: `makeover-geometry` answers how
1198/// much space and this crate answers what the thing is. Emitting `font-size`
1199/// here would be this crate naming a value, which is the one thing it is defined
1200/// by not doing, and `progress_rules` is the precedent — it emits the tones and
1201/// never the width, because the width is not its to know.
1202///
1203/// So the arrangement and the type scale are the app's, and what is generated is
1204/// the part an app cannot get right by itself: which of the two spans carries
1205/// the tone.
1206fn figure_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1207    let figure = class("figure", opts);
1208    let value = class("figure-value", opts);
1209    let caption = class("figure-caption", opts);
1210    let change = class("figure-change", opts);
1211    let mut css = String::new();
1212
1213    let _ = writeln!(
1214        css,
1215        ".{figure} > .{value} {{\n    color: var(--{});\n}}",
1216        Tone::Neutral.token()
1217    );
1218    let _ = writeln!(
1219        css,
1220        ".{figure} > .{caption} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1221    );
1222    let _ = writeln!(
1223        css,
1224        ".{figure} > .{change} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1225    );
1226
1227    // A toned figure tones one part and never the caption. The caption is the
1228    // noun and stays muted.
1229    //
1230    // Which part depends on whether there is a change, and that is the whole of
1231    // what 0.13.0 changed here. A figure with a delta is an ordinary number that
1232    // has moved in a direction worth reading, so the delta takes the colour and
1233    // the number stays plain; a figure without one has nowhere else to put it.
1234    // `:has` is what lets one attribute mean both, and the alternative was the
1235    // emitter deciding by writing the attribute onto a different element, which
1236    // leaves two elements able to disagree about a figure's one meaning.
1237    for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1238        let _ = writeln!(
1239            css,
1240            ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{change} {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1241            tone.token()
1242        );
1243        let _ = writeln!(
1244            css,
1245            ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"]:not(:has(> .{change})) > .{value} \
1246             {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1247            tone.token()
1248        );
1249    }
1250    css
1251}
1252
1253/// A picture, its frame and its caption.
1254///
1255/// `makeover_layout::Image` arrived at 0.21.0, found by trying to describe MNW's
1256/// carousel and discovering nothing named a picture.
1257///
1258/// # The frame is a border, and this is the one place a bevel is wrong
1259///
1260/// 0.36.0 emitted [`Depth::Raised`] here through [`depth_rule`], the same call
1261/// `button` and `card` make. It was wrong, and MNW's landing page is where it
1262/// showed: **the frames had no visible edge at all.**
1263///
1264/// `Depth::Raised`'s edge is `--bevel-raised`, which is an *inset* shadow — a
1265/// 1px light run at the top-left and a dark one at the bottom-right, drawn
1266/// **inside** the element's box. On a button or a card that box is a surface
1267/// this crate owns, so an inset edge reads as the surface catching the light.
1268/// On a picture it is drawn on top of the picture, over whatever pixels the
1269/// image happens to have at its border. MNW's screenshots are light-on-light
1270/// parchment, so the light half landed on a light image and the frame
1271/// disappeared.
1272///
1273/// **You cannot bevel a surface you do not own.** A picture's content is the
1274/// app's, arrives at request time, and can be any colour, so its edge has to
1275/// sit *outside* the content rather than on it. That is a border.
1276///
1277/// The fill stays, and it is not decoration: it is what shows through a
1278/// transparent PNG and what stands in the frame's place while the image is
1279/// still loading.
1280///
1281/// This is a real limit on [`Depth`] rather than a special case. Every other
1282/// consumer of a depth draws its own surface; a picture is the first member
1283/// whose surface belongs to someone else.
1284///
1285/// # No size
1286///
1287/// `width: 100%` and nothing else. How large a picture is depends on the box it
1288/// was put in, which is the app's arrangement and `makeover-geometry`'s scales,
1289/// and a renderer that picked one would be answering for every consumer at
1290/// once. This is where `figure_rules` landed for the same reason.
1291fn picture_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1292    let picture = class("picture", opts);
1293    let img = class("picture-img", opts);
1294    let caption = class("picture-caption", opts);
1295    let mut css = String::new();
1296
1297    // Block, or an inline image sits on the text baseline and carries a
1298    // descender's worth of space under it that no app ever wants and every app
1299    // deletes by hand. The border is the frame; see the type docs for why it is
1300    // not the bevel every other surface here gets.
1301    let _ = writeln!(
1302        css,
1303        ".{img} {{\n    display: block;\n    width: 100%;\n    height: auto;\n    \
1304         background: var(--{});\n    border: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1305        Fill::Raised.token(),
1306        opts.border_width
1307    );
1308
1309    // The two fits that need a rule. `Fit::Natural` emits no attribute at all,
1310    // so it is the bare rule above and needs nothing here.
1311    let _ = writeln!(
1312        css,
1313        ".{img}[data-fit=\"cover\"] {{\n    height: 100%;\n    object-fit: cover;\n}}"
1314    );
1315    let _ = writeln!(
1316        css,
1317        ".{img}[data-fit=\"contain\"] {{\n    height: 100%;\n    object-fit: contain;\n}}"
1318    );
1319
1320    // A caption reads back one step, which is `figure-caption`'s answer and the
1321    // same claim: it says what the thing above it is, and it is not the thing.
1322    let _ = writeln!(
1323        css,
1324        ".{picture} > .{caption} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1325    );
1326
1327    css
1328}
1329
1330/// A region showing one child at a time, and the chrome that moves between them.
1331///
1332/// [`makeover_layout::Showing`] lets a description say that a region holds
1333/// several children and shows some of them. A renderer derives its own chrome
1334/// from that, which is what stops every renderer growing a `match` on a widget
1335/// name; these are the rules the derived chrome needs.
1336///
1337/// # Why the default is every child, and the enhancement takes them away
1338///
1339/// The controls are a lie until something binds them. A prev button rendered
1340/// into a document with no script is a control that looks live and answers
1341/// nothing, and the reader it lies to is exactly the one who cannot see the
1342/// other children either — the collapsing and the moving are the same half.
1343///
1344/// So the rules run in the direction the enhancement does. Nothing here hides a
1345/// child and nothing here shows a control. Whatever binds the region sets
1346/// `data-ready` on it, and that is what collapses the stack to one and reveals
1347/// the row that moves it. A reader with no script gets every child in order and
1348/// no controls, which is more content rather than less, and a reader with
1349/// script gets a settled page rather than a stack that jumps to one frame after
1350/// load.
1351///
1352/// MNW proved this shape by hand — a `<noscript>` stylesheet opening its
1353/// carousel back out — and it is here rather than there because the property is
1354/// the description's, not one app's.
1355///
1356/// # Not spacing
1357///
1358/// The row's gaps are `makeover-geometry`'s question and are absent for
1359/// [`row_rules`]'s reason. What is here is `display`, which carries no
1360/// magnitude, and the muted readout, which is the same claim `picture-caption`
1361/// makes: it says where you are among the children and it is not one of them.
1362fn showing_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1363    let controls = class("showing", opts);
1364    let position = class("showing-position", opts);
1365    let frame = class("showing-frame", opts);
1366    let mut css = String::new();
1367
1368    // Hidden until something binds it, which is the whole argument above.
1369    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{controls} {{\n    display: none;\n}}");
1370    // Block, and nothing about how the three sit in it. A button and a span are
1371    // inline already, so they make a row without this crate saying so, and
1372    // saying so is where `align-items` and a gap would follow -- both spacing,
1373    // both `makeover-geometry`'s, and `row_rules` refuses them for the same
1374    // reason.
1375    let _ = writeln!(
1376        css,
1377        "[data-ready] > .{controls} {{\n    display: block;\n}}"
1378    );
1379
1380    // A child is in flow until the region is bound, and then only the current
1381    // one is. `.current` is a modifier for the reason `.chosen` and `.latched`
1382    // are: one name for the state, set by whoever knows it.
1383    let _ = writeln!(
1384        css,
1385        "[data-ready] > .{frame}:not(.current) {{\n    display: none;\n}}"
1386    );
1387
1388    // Reads back one step. `picture-caption`'s rule and its reason.
1389    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{position} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1390
1391    css
1392}
1393
1394/// A time axis: the container, its gridlines and ruler, and the placed things.
1395///
1396/// `makeover-layout` 0.24.0's [`Track`](makeover_layout::Track), and the first
1397/// member here whose whole point is *position*. That makes the magnitude line
1398/// this crate keeps worth restating rather than assuming.
1399///
1400/// # Where the numbers come from
1401///
1402/// Every value that varies per item is a custom property the caller sets
1403/// inline, and every rule here reads one. `--track-at` and `--track-for` are
1404/// percentages of the span, which
1405/// [`Track::fraction`](makeover_layout::Track::fraction) computes once so three
1406/// renderers cannot disagree about it. Nothing here knows a pixel.
1407///
1408/// That is what lets the stylesheet stay static while the items move: an entry
1409/// carries `style="--track-at: 37.5%; --track-for: 4.166%"` and the rule below
1410/// turns it into a box. The alternative was emitting a rule per item, which is
1411/// a stylesheet that grows with the data.
1412///
1413/// **The height of the track is the app's**, not this crate's. 96 quarter-hour
1414/// slots at some slot height is a size, and a size is `makeover-geometry`'s
1415/// question -- the same refusal `figure_rules` and `placeholder_rules` make.
1416/// Percentages need a resolved height above them, so `.track` gets
1417/// `position: relative` and nothing else; the app says how tall a day is.
1418///
1419/// # Overlap
1420///
1421/// Two things at the same time is intrinsic to an axis and has no analogue in a
1422/// list. The description does not declare it -- `Placement::overlaps` derives it
1423/// from the times -- so what arrives here is a lane index and a lane count, and
1424/// the rule divides the width. A renderer that would rather stack them ignores
1425/// both properties and the defaults give it one full-width lane.
1426fn track_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1427    let track = class("track", opts);
1428    let slot = class("track-slot", opts);
1429    let tick = class("track-tick", opts);
1430    let entry = class("track-entry", opts);
1431    let mut css = String::new();
1432
1433    // The positioning context every entry resolves against, and the whole of
1434    // what this crate says about the container. No height: see the doc above.
1435    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{track} {{\n    position: relative;\n}}");
1436
1437    // Gridlines and the ruler are the axis reading itself back, which is
1438    // `picture-caption` and `showing-position`'s claim: about the thing rather
1439    // than one of the things.
1440    //
1441    // `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` writes its
1442    // edge. A gridline is the one place a timeline would most naturally reach
1443    // for a hardcoded 1px, and a hardcoded 1px is this crate naming a size.
1444    let _ = writeln!(
1445        css,
1446        ".{slot} {{\n    border-top: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1447        opts.border_width
1448    );
1449    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{tick} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1450
1451    // The one rule that does real work. Top and height are the placement;
1452    // left and width are the lane. Both lane properties default so an entry
1453    // that names neither is full width, which is the common case and the one a
1454    // renderer gets for free.
1455    let _ = writeln!(
1456        css,
1457        ".{entry} {{\n    \
1458         position: absolute;\n    \
1459         top: var(--track-at, 0%);\n    \
1460         height: var(--track-for, 100%);\n    \
1461         left: calc(var(--track-lane, 0) / var(--track-lanes, 1) * 100%);\n    \
1462         width: calc(100% / var(--track-lanes, 1));\n\
1463         }}"
1464    );
1465
1466    css
1467}
1468
1469/// A region's stand-in, and the header of a table that can be reordered.
1470///
1471/// Both are 0.12.0 members and both are colour and affordance only, which is
1472/// where `figure_rules` landed after trying to emit a type scale. How much room
1473/// a stand-in gets is a size — goingson has the same one at three, as
1474/// `--compact`, `--dashboard` and `--padded` — and a size is
1475/// `makeover-geometry`'s question.
1476///
1477/// The caret is the one thing here that is neither colour nor affordance, and it
1478/// is a renderer's own expression rather than a value the description named:
1479/// `aria-sort` is what the table actually says, and this turns it into something
1480/// visible for everyone not using a screen reader. A terminal draws its own; an
1481/// immediate-mode painter draws its own.
1482fn state_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1483    let placeholder = class("placeholder", opts);
1484    let text = class("placeholder-text", opts);
1485    let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1486    let mut css = String::new();
1487
1488    let _ = writeln!(
1489        css,
1490        ".{placeholder} > .{text} {{\n    color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1491    );
1492    // Only the failure is toned. An empty list is the normal state of a new
1493    // install, and `Readiness::tone` is what says so.
1494    let _ = writeln!(
1495        css,
1496        ".{placeholder}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{text} {{\n    color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1497        Tone::Danger.token()
1498    );
1499
1500    // A header that reorders the table is a control, and the pointer is the
1501    // only part of saying so that is not the app's own type and spacing.
1502    let _ = writeln!(
1503        css,
1504        ".{heading}[data-sortable] {{\n    cursor: pointer;\n}}"
1505    );
1506    // The caret carries its own leading space, the way `makeover-tui` and
1507    // `makeover-immediate` both write `" \u{25B2}"`. It used to be emitted bare,
1508    // and both apps that adopted the vocabulary had to put the gap back in their
1509    // own stylesheets on the same afternoon -- each having to work out first that
1510    // app CSS outranks this crate's cascade layer, so adding the space the
1511    // obvious way, as `content`, silently wins over the glyph and leaves the
1512    // heading with no caret at all. A consumer should not have to know that, and
1513    // with the space emitted here there is nothing left for one to add.
1514    //
1515    // Three states, three tones, on the convention in wiki
1516    // `three-tone-convention`. A column in force is `content`; a column offering
1517    // to reorder and not doing it now is `content-secondary`, because it still
1518    // answers a press; a column that is not sortable emits no caret at all and
1519    // takes nothing. The idle arm used to hide its glyph and reserve the box,
1520    // which cost a reflow-free press and said nothing. It draws now, and the
1521    // reservation stops being a thing to get right.
1522    //
1523    // The glyph is `Sort::glyph`, escaped rather than written: a CSS `content`
1524    // string cannot carry the character literally through this file's own
1525    // escaping, and spelling it here as well would put the third copy back that
1526    // `makeover-layout` 0.27.5 exists to remove.
1527    let _ = writeln!(
1528        css,
1529        ".{heading}[data-sortable]::after \
1530         {{\n    content: \" {}\";\n    color: var(--content-secondary);\n}}",
1531        css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())
1532    );
1533    for direction in [Sort::Ascending, Sort::Descending] {
1534        let _ = writeln!(
1535            css,
1536            ".{heading}[aria-sort=\"{}\"]::after \
1537             {{\n    content: \" {}\";\n    color: var(--content);\n}}",
1538            direction.as_str(),
1539            css_escape(direction.glyph())
1540        );
1541    }
1542    css
1543}
1544
1545/// The frame a table sits in.
1546///
1547/// # Why this is a CSS table and not the grid the rest of the module assumes
1548///
1549/// A grid row needs `grid-template-columns`, which has to name every column in
1550/// order, so it cannot be written without knowing the columns. That is what
1551/// [`list::narrowing_css`] is for, and it works: goingson builds `tables.css` in
1552/// its own `build.rs` out of it, and nothing here changes that.
1553///
1554/// It does not work for a table a *description* produced. Those columns are
1555/// known at render time rather than at build time, and the rules would have to
1556/// travel with the markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs
1557/// `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` and so blocks the MNW server's standing plan to
1558/// drop it. The head is not an escape: a table swapped in by htmx after a
1559/// delete arrives as a fragment with no head at all.
1560///
1561/// A CSS table aligns its columns across rows knowing nothing about how many
1562/// there are, so there is no track list to emit and nothing per-table to carry.
1563/// The cost is that a described table cannot take a per-column fixed length,
1564/// which costs nothing today: [`Sizing`](list::Sizing) is looked up by column
1565/// name and a description carries no lengths to put in it, so every track a
1566/// described table could ask for is already content, fill or auto.
1567///
1568/// [`Priority`] hiding is unchanged in kind. It moves from a generated
1569/// `display: none` per dropped column to one rule per drop class, which is the
1570/// same fact addressed by class rather than by cutoff, and still never by
1571/// position.
1572fn table_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1573    let table = class("table", opts);
1574    let head = class("table-head", opts);
1575    let row = class("table-row", opts);
1576    let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1577    let cell = class("cell", opts);
1578    let mut css = String::new();
1579
1580    let _ = writeln!(
1581        css,
1582        ".{table} {{\n    display: table;\n    width: 100%;\n}}"
1583    );
1584    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{head},\n.{row} {{\n    display: table-row;\n}}");
1585    let _ = writeln!(css, ".{heading},\n.{cell} {{\n    display: table-cell;\n}}");
1586
1587    // A content column shrinks to what is in it. `width: 1%` is how a CSS table
1588    // is told that: auto layout hands the slack to the columns that asked for
1589    // room, and a column asking for almost none gets what it needs and no more.
1590    // The `nowrap` is what stops it being given less by wrapping.
1591    let _ = writeln!(
1592        css,
1593        ".{} {{\n    white-space: nowrap;\n    width: 1%;\n}}",
1594        class("cell-content", opts)
1595    );
1596
1597    // A fixed column has no length to be fixed to. The description carries none
1598    // and `Sizing` is not reachable from here, so it behaves as content: the
1599    // honest answer to a width nobody supplied, and the same one `Sizing::track`
1600    // gives it.
1601    let _ = writeln!(
1602        css,
1603        ".{} {{\n    white-space: nowrap;\n}}",
1604        class("cell-fixed", opts)
1605    );
1606
1607    // Optional columns go at the narrowest class, secondary ones go with them,
1608    // which is the cutoff walk `kept_at` describes said as two media queries.
1609    // Essential columns have no rule at all, because never dropping is what not
1610    // being mentioned already means.
1611    for (size, drops) in [
1612        (
1613            SizeClass::Compact,
1614            &["cell-drops-first", "cell-drops-next"][..],
1615        ),
1616        (SizeClass::Medium, &["cell-drops-first"][..]),
1617    ] {
1618        let selectors: Vec<String> = drops
1619            .iter()
1620            .map(|drop| format!(".{}", class(drop, opts)))
1621            .collect();
1622        css.push_str(&gated(
1623            Some(&size.media_condition()),
1624            &format!("{} {{\n    display: none;\n}}\n", selectors.join(",\n")),
1625        ));
1626    }
1627
1628    // What is inside a cell, which the table side could not say until
1629    // makeover-layout 0.14.0. Every cell was one `.cell` and one content
1630    // colour, so a button in a cell was painted as text -- the drift
1631    // `RowPart::intent` has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented
1632    // for nothing here.
1633    //
1634    // The colour goes on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell`, and that
1635    // placement is the whole fix. On the container it would cascade into the
1636    // tokens and the controls sitting beside the text, which is the bug said
1637    // in one rule; on the part that is text, it reaches text and stops.
1638    for part in [
1639        CellPart::Value,
1640        CellPart::Tokens,
1641        CellPart::Actions,
1642        CellPart::Link,
1643    ] {
1644        // Three of the four inherit, each for its own reason: a token carries
1645        // its own tone, an action is a control rather than text, and a link
1646        // takes the action colour from the anchor it is. `CellPart::intent`
1647        // says so by answering with the intent inheriting already gives, and
1648        // pinning that would be louder than saying nothing.
1649        //
1650        // Written as a skip-list rather than as a match on Value, so a member
1651        // added upstream gets its intent emitted rather than being silently
1652        // dropped. That is the same trade `part_class`'s fallback makes: land
1653        // plainly, never land as nothing.
1654        if !matches!(part, CellPart::Tokens | CellPart::Actions | CellPart::Link) {
1655            let _ = writeln!(
1656                css,
1657                ".{} {{\n    color: var(--{});\n}}",
1658                class(cell_part_class(part), opts),
1659                part.intent()
1660            );
1661        }
1662    }
1663
1664    css
1665}
1666
1667/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
1668///
1669/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
1670/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
1671/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
1672#[must_use]
1673pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1674    let mut css = String::new();
1675    css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
1676    css.push_str(&link_rules(opts));
1677    css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
1678    css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
1679    css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
1680    css.push_str(&run_rules(opts));
1681    css.push_str(&progress_rules(opts));
1682    css.push_str(&figure_rules(opts));
1683    css.push_str(&picture_rules(opts));
1684    css.push_str(&showing_rules(opts));
1685    css.push_str(&track_rules(opts));
1686    css.push_str(&state_rules(opts));
1687    css.push_str(&table_rules(opts));
1688    css.push_str(&facet::facet_rules(opts));
1689    css.push_str(&form::editor_rules(opts));
1690    css.push_str(&form::suggestion_rules(opts));
1691    css
1692}
1693
1694/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, in
1695/// [`CSS_LAYER`], under a generated-file banner.
1696///
1697/// The banner sits outside the layer, because a comment participates in no
1698/// cascade and a reader opening the file should see what it is before seeing
1699/// an at-rule.
1700#[must_use]
1701pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1702    format!(
1703        "/* Generated by makeover-webview from makeover-layout. Do not edit.\n   \
1704         Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n   \
1705         them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout.\n\n   \
1706         Everything below is in the `{CSS_LAYER}` cascade layer. Declare the\n   \
1707         order once in your own stylesheet, or this layer's position is decided\n   \
1708         by whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:\n\n   \
1709         @layer {CSS_LAYER}, base, components, responsive; */\n{}",
1710        in_css_layer(&format!(
1711            ":root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
1712            bevel_properties(opts),
1713            depth_rules(opts),
1714            component_rules(opts)
1715        ))
1716    )
1717}
1718
1719#[cfg(test)]
1720mod tests {
1721    use super::*;
1722    use makeover_layout::Edge;
1723
1724    #[test]
1725    fn every_fallback_class_is_one_a_checker_knows_about() {
1726        // The obligation ROW_PART_CLASSES carries, for the same reason: a class
1727        // this crate can write and the vocabulary list does not carry is
1728        // invisible to the dead-vocabulary seal and to the overlap check both.
1729        for fallback in [
1730            Fallback::Wrap,
1731            Fallback::Stack,
1732            Fallback::Shed,
1733            Fallback::Menu,
1734        ] {
1735            assert!(
1736                RUN_CLASSES.contains(&fallback_class(fallback)),
1737                "{fallback:?} is missing from RUN_CLASSES"
1738            );
1739        }
1740        let names = crate::vocabulary::names(&Emit::default());
1741        for name in RUN_CLASSES {
1742            assert!(names.contains(*name), "{name} is not in the vocabulary");
1743        }
1744    }
1745
1746    #[test]
1747    fn a_run_gives_every_member_a_floor_it_cannot_be_squeezed_below() {
1748        // The whole of what stops the overlap, and it is not a fallback: it
1749        // applies to every run whatever the group declared. flexbox's default
1750        // min-width is auto, which lets an item be compressed below its own
1751        // content in a nowrap row, and that is how a toolbar is drawn over a
1752        // tab strip even with nothing out of flow.
1753        let css = run_rules(&Emit::default());
1754        assert!(css.contains(".run > * {\n    min-width: min-content;\n}"));
1755        // No number anywhere in it. The minimum is derived by the browser from
1756        // what the members contain, which is the ruling's own requirement.
1757        assert!(!css.contains("px"));
1758        assert!(!css.contains("rem"));
1759        assert!(!css.contains("@media"));
1760    }
1761
1762    #[test]
1763    fn room_is_never_asked_of_the_viewport() {
1764        // The 913 case: a window in SizeClass::Expanded holding a group out of
1765        // room. A viewport query answers about the window and would be wrong
1766        // about the group, which is why the table's @media walk is not the
1767        // precedent this follows.
1768        let css = run_rules(&Emit::default());
1769        for size in [SizeClass::Compact, SizeClass::Medium] {
1770            assert!(!css.contains(&size.media_condition()));
1771        }
1772    }
1773
1774    #[test]
1775    fn every_fallback_lands_as_a_class_and_an_unknown_one_lands_plainly() {
1776        let css = run_rules(&Emit::default());
1777        for fallback in [
1778            Fallback::Wrap,
1779            Fallback::Stack,
1780            Fallback::Shed,
1781            Fallback::Menu,
1782        ] {
1783            let class = fallback_class(fallback);
1784            assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{class} {{")), "{class} unemitted");
1785        }
1786        // Stack is the one that also says what a member does with the line it
1787        // took, which is what separates it from wrapping.
1788        assert!(css.contains(".run-stack > * {\n    flex: 1 1 max-content;\n}"));
1789    }
1790
1791    #[test]
1792    fn the_emitted_bevel_matches_what_the_apps_already_hand_write() {
1793        // Balanced Breakfast's styles.css, verbatim. Adoption has to be a
1794        // deletion, not a redesign, or nobody will take it.
1795        let opts = Emit::default();
1796        assert_eq!(
1797            bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts),
1798            "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-light), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-dark)"
1799        );
1800        assert_eq!(
1801            bevel_shadow(Bevel::Inset, &opts),
1802            "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-dark), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-light)"
1803        );
1804    }
1805
1806    #[test]
1807    fn no_colour_ever_reaches_the_output() {
1808        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1809        assert!(!css.contains('#'), "a hex literal escaped into the CSS");
1810        assert!(
1811            !css.contains("rgb"),
1812            "a colour function escaped into the CSS"
1813        );
1814        // Every colour is named, never resolved.
1815        assert!(css.contains("var(--surface-raised)"));
1816        assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-light)"));
1817    }
1818
1819    #[test]
1820    fn a_well_falls_back_through_css_rather_than_through_rust() {
1821        assert_eq!(
1822            fill_var(Fill::Well),
1823            "var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"
1824        );
1825        // Nothing else needs one.
1826        assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Raised), "var(--surface-raised)");
1827        assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Page), "var(--surface-page)");
1828    }
1829
1830    #[test]
1831    fn raised_and_well_do_not_collapse_onto_each_other() {
1832        let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
1833        assert!(css.contains(".raised {"));
1834        assert!(css.contains(".well {"));
1835        assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"));
1836        assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"));
1837    }
1838
1839    /// The cast shadow is composed here from the tone `makeover` derives, so
1840    /// neither crate has to hold the other's numbers.
1841    ///
1842    /// It is a `:root` property and deliberately not a depth class. There is no
1843    /// `Depth::Overlay` in the description layer, and adding one would be a
1844    /// claim about what a screen means rather than about how it is painted;
1845    /// until something asks for it, a consumer names the property on the rule
1846    /// for the menu or the toast it already has.
1847    #[test]
1848    fn the_cast_shadow_is_a_root_property_not_a_depth() {
1849        let css = bevel_properties(&Emit::default());
1850        assert!(css.contains("--elevation-overlay:"));
1851        assert!(css.contains("var(--elevation)"));
1852        assert!(
1853            !depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("elevation"),
1854            "elevation is not a depth class"
1855        );
1856    }
1857
1858    #[test]
1859    fn the_cascade_carries_the_pressed_state() {
1860        let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
1861        // The one thing this renderer gets free that the other two resolve by
1862        // hand, eighteen call sites deep in audiofiles' case. Asserted on a
1863        // named surface: pressing belongs to the control, not to the depth.
1864        assert!(css.contains(".card:active {"));
1865        assert!(css.contains(".button:active {"));
1866    }
1867
1868    #[test]
1869    fn the_depth_class_is_a_surface_and_not_a_control() {
1870        let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
1871        // The static surface the vocabulary was missing. Sixteen goingson
1872        // elements wore .card and cancelled its hover and press to get this,
1873        // because a raised object that is not pressable had no other spelling.
1874        for state in [":hover", ":active", ":focus-visible", ":disabled"] {
1875            assert!(
1876                !css.contains(&format!(".raised{state}")),
1877                "the depth class claimed {state}: {css}"
1878            );
1879        }
1880        assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"), "still raised: {css}");
1881    }
1882
1883    #[test]
1884    fn pressing_moves_the_fill_and_not_only_the_edge() {
1885        // The decision-1 guard, and the regression that mattered: emitting the
1886        // bevel flip alone is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
1887        // var(--surface-sunken)` on .btn, .card and .tag/.badge alike, so none
1888        // of the three could be deleted.
1889        let pressed = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1890        assert!(pressed.contains(".button:active {"));
1891        assert!(
1892            pressed.contains("background: var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"),
1893            "pressed dropped its fill: {pressed}"
1894        );
1895        assert!(pressed.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
1896    }
1897
1898    #[test]
1899    fn pressed_takes_its_fill_from_the_description_not_from_the_app() {
1900        // goingson presses to --surface-sunken. The description says a pressed
1901        // raised region reads as a well, and makeover says outright that
1902        // surface-sunken cannot serve as one, so the app is the thing that
1903        // moves.
1904        //
1905        // Scoped to the pressed rules rather than to the whole sheet: since
1906        // makeover-layout 0.3.0 an unchosen tab is legitimately
1907        // --surface-sunken, so the token appearing somewhere in the output no
1908        // longer means the app's choice leaked in.
1909        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1910        let mut checked = 0;
1911        for rule in css.split("}\n") {
1912            if !rule.contains(":active") {
1913                continue;
1914            }
1915            checked += 1;
1916            assert!(
1917                !rule.contains("surface-sunken"),
1918                "a pressed rule took the app's fill: {rule}"
1919            );
1920        }
1921        assert!(checked > 0, "no pressed rules found to check");
1922        assert_eq!(
1923            Depth::Raised.pressed().fill(),
1924            Some(Fill::Well),
1925            "the description changed under us"
1926        );
1927    }
1928
1929    #[test]
1930    fn the_whole_stylesheet_is_emitted_in_the_family_layer() {
1931        // The point of 0.11.0. Unlayered normal declarations outrank every
1932        // named layer, so an app declaring `@layer base, components` loses
1933        // every rule it owns to this file until this file is layered too.
1934        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1935        assert!(css.contains(&format!("@layer {CSS_LAYER} {{")));
1936
1937        // Exactly one layer block, and nothing outside it but the banner.
1938        assert_eq!(css.matches("@layer").count(), 2, "banner names it once");
1939        let opened = css.find("@layer makeover {").expect("layer opens");
1940        for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
1941            let before_layer = css.lines().take(i).map(str::len).sum::<usize>() < opened;
1942            if before_layer || line.is_empty() {
1943                continue;
1944            }
1945            assert!(
1946                line.starts_with("    ") || line == "}" || line.starts_with("   "),
1947                "line outside the layer: {line:?}"
1948            );
1949        }
1950    }
1951
1952    #[test]
1953    fn the_generated_sheet_carries_no_trailing_whitespace() {
1954        // A checked-in generated file that a formatter wants to rewrite is a
1955        // diff every time somebody saves it.
1956        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1957        for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
1958            assert_eq!(line, line.trim_end(), "trailing whitespace on line {i}");
1959        }
1960    }
1961
1962    #[test]
1963    fn the_banner_tells_an_app_how_to_order_the_layer() {
1964        // Without a declared order the layer's position depends on which
1965        // generated file the browser sees first, which is not a contract.
1966        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1967        assert!(css.contains("@layer makeover, base, components, responsive;"));
1968        // And the banner is outside the layer, not a rule inside it.
1969        assert!(css.starts_with("/* Generated by makeover-webview"));
1970    }
1971
1972    #[test]
1973    fn a_primitive_owns_every_state_it_implies() {
1974        // The whole point of 0.10.0. Anything emitting a hover rule owes the
1975        // other three, or the consuming app supplies them by out-specifying a
1976        // rule it does not own: 19 such rules in goingson, 21 in the MNW
1977        // server, and three focus rings that do not match.
1978        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1979        for selector in ["button", "card", "chip", "tab", "segment", "toggle"] {
1980            assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:hover {{")), "{selector}");
1981            assert!(
1982                css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:active {{")),
1983                "{selector}"
1984            );
1985            assert!(
1986                css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:focus-visible {{")),
1987                "{selector} has no focus ring"
1988            );
1989            assert!(
1990                css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:disabled,")),
1991                "{selector} has no disabled state"
1992            );
1993        }
1994    }
1995
1996    #[test]
1997    fn a_field_takes_focus_and_refuses_input_without_taking_a_hover() {
1998        // A text field does not light up under the pointer, so it gets the two
1999        // states it has and not the two it does not.
2000        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2001        assert!(css.contains(".field:focus-visible {"));
2002        assert!(css.contains(".field:disabled,"));
2003        assert!(!css.contains(".field:hover {"));
2004        assert!(!css.contains(".field:active {"));
2005    }
2006
2007    #[test]
2008    fn disabled_is_emitted_after_hover_so_source_order_settles_it() {
2009        // Every one of these selectors is specificity (0,2,0), so nothing but
2010        // order decides which wins. A disabled button taking the hover fill is
2011        // the exact bug goingson's `.button:disabled:hover` was written to fix,
2012        // and the reason it had to reach (0,3,0) to do it.
2013        let css = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
2014        let hover = css.find(":hover").expect("hover");
2015        let active = css.find(":active").expect("active");
2016        let focus = css.find(":focus-visible").expect("focus");
2017        let disabled = css.find(":disabled").expect("disabled");
2018        assert!(hover < active && active < focus && focus < disabled);
2019
2020        // And it restores the surface, or the hover fill survives underneath.
2021        let tail = &css[disabled..];
2022        assert!(tail.contains("background: var(--surface-raised)"));
2023    }
2024
2025    #[test]
2026    fn a_disabled_state_reaches_things_that_cannot_be_disabled() {
2027        // `:disabled` matches form elements only, and a chip is a div. Keying
2028        // on the ARIA attribute too is the pattern the invalid field already
2029        // set: one fact, read by the styling and the accessibility tree alike.
2030        let css = disabled_rule("chip", Depth::Raised);
2031        assert!(css.contains(".chip:disabled,"));
2032        assert!(css.contains(".chip[aria-disabled=\"true\"]"));
2033        assert!(css.contains("cursor: not-allowed"));
2034    }
2035
2036    #[test]
2037    fn the_focus_ring_does_not_disturb_the_bevel_it_lands_on() {
2038        // `outline` has its own property, so unlike the invalid ring there is
2039        // no bevel to restate beside it and nothing to keep in agreement.
2040        let opts = Emit::default();
2041        let css = focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts);
2042        assert!(css.contains("outline: 2px solid var(--focus-ring)"));
2043        assert!(!css.contains("box-shadow"), "the ring restated the bevel");
2044    }
2045
2046    #[test]
2047    fn a_well_takes_the_ring_inside_and_a_raised_surface_outside() {
2048        // One ring, placed by depth. The offset comes off `Depth::bevel` and
2049        // not off a per-component choice, which is what gave three apps three
2050        // different rings.
2051        let opts = Emit::default();
2052        assert!(focus_rule("field", Depth::Well, &opts).contains("outline-offset: calc(-1 * 2px)"));
2053        assert!(focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
2054        // Nothing to sit inside of, so it sits outside.
2055        assert!(focus_rule("badge", Depth::Sunken, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
2056
2057        // And the ring is not the bevel. Reusing border_width emitted a 1px
2058        // ring that every consumer had already overridden.
2059        assert_ne!(opts.focus_width, opts.border_width);
2060    }
2061
2062    #[test]
2063    fn hover_is_gated_on_capability_and_the_keyboard_path_is_not() {
2064        // goingson's section 60 exists only to take back the hover state this
2065        // crate handed it. Gating at the source is what deletes that section
2066        // in all three apps rather than having each fight for it.
2067        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2068        let condition = format!("@media {}", Density::Pointer.media_condition());
2069        assert!(css.contains(&condition));
2070
2071        // What is gated is every hover state the surfaces carry. The row's
2072        // actions used to be the other half of this test and are not gated any
2073        // more, because they are not hidden any more: a rule that reveals
2074        // nothing needs no capability answer.
2075        let gated: Vec<&str> = css.lines().filter(|line| line.contains(":hover")).collect();
2076        assert!(!gated.is_empty(), "{css}");
2077        for line in gated {
2078            let indent = line.len() - line.trim_start().len();
2079            assert!(indent > 4, "an ungated hover rule: {line}");
2080        }
2081        assert!(!css.contains(".row:hover"), "{css}");
2082    }
2083
2084    #[test]
2085    fn the_capability_answer_is_asked_for_and_not_assumed() {
2086        // Both halves come from the crates that own them. If `makeover-touch`
2087        // ever says a fingertip has hover, this stops gating on its own.
2088        assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact));
2089        assert!(Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Pointer, SizeClass::Compact));
2090        assert_eq!(hover_condition(), Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition()));
2091
2092        // And the size class passed to that call is not a claim about width.
2093        assert!(Affordance::Hover.reads_density());
2094        for size in [SizeClass::Compact, SizeClass::Medium, SizeClass::Expanded] {
2095            assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, size));
2096        }
2097    }
2098
2099    #[test]
2100    fn hover_resolves_against_the_token_makeover_already_derives() {
2101        let css = interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
2102        assert!(css.contains(".card:hover {"));
2103        assert!(css.contains("background: var(--hover-surface)"));
2104        // Not the app's choice, which was --surface-overlay.
2105        assert!(!css.contains("surface-overlay"));
2106    }
2107
2108    #[test]
2109    fn a_badge_gets_no_edge_and_no_fill() {
2110        // Decision 2, and the one visible redesign in phase A. Token::Badge is
2111        // Flat: an edge on a label says it can be pressed.
2112        let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
2113        let badge = css
2114            .lines()
2115            .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".badge {"))
2116            .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2117            .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2118            .join("\n");
2119        assert!(!badge.contains("box-shadow"), "badge kept an edge: {badge}");
2120        assert!(!badge.contains("background"), "badge kept a fill: {badge}");
2121        assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(false), Depth::Flat);
2122        assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(true), Depth::Flat);
2123    }
2124
2125    #[test]
2126    fn a_badge_carries_a_tone_and_neutral_is_the_bare_class() {
2127        let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
2128        // Neutral is the absence of a status, not a status named "none".
2129        assert!(css.contains(".badge {\n    color: var(--content-muted);"));
2130        assert!(!css.contains("data-tone=\"content-muted\""));
2131        for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
2132            assert!(
2133                css.contains(&format!(".badge[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
2134                "missing tone {tone}"
2135            );
2136            assert!(css.contains(&format!("color: var(--{tone})")));
2137        }
2138    }
2139
2140    #[test]
2141    fn a_chip_is_raised_and_latches_into_a_well() {
2142        let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
2143        assert!(css.contains(".chip {"));
2144        assert!(css.contains(".chip.latched {"));
2145        assert!(css.contains(".chip:active {"));
2146        // The whole difference from a badge: it answers a click.
2147        assert!(Token::Chip { removable: false }.interactive());
2148        assert!(!Token::Badge.interactive());
2149    }
2150
2151    #[test]
2152    fn only_a_tab_comes_forward_when_chosen() {
2153        // The folder semantic. Collapsing the three selectors would lose it.
2154        let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
2155        assert!(css.contains(".tab.chosen {"));
2156        assert!(css.contains(".segment.chosen {"));
2157        assert!(css.contains(".toggle.chosen {"));
2158        assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.chosen(), Depth::Raised);
2159        assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2160        assert_eq!(Selector::Toggle.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2161
2162        let tab = css
2163            .lines()
2164            .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".tab.chosen {"))
2165            .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2166            .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2167            .join("\n");
2168        assert!(
2169            tab.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"),
2170            "tab was held in: {tab}"
2171        );
2172    }
2173
2174    #[test]
2175    fn an_unchosen_tab_recedes_without_looking_picked() {
2176        let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
2177        // Recessed by colour and given no edge. An edge would make every option
2178        // look picked; flat would leave the chosen one nothing to come forward
2179        // from, which is the gap makeover-layout 0.3.0 closed.
2180        assert!(
2181            css.contains(".tab {\n    background: var(--surface-sunken);\n}"),
2182            "unchosen tab is not recessed: {css}"
2183        );
2184        assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.unchosen(), Depth::Sunken);
2185        assert!(css.contains(".tab:hover {"));
2186    }
2187
2188    #[test]
2189    fn a_segment_stands_up_so_the_chosen_one_can_be_held_in() {
2190        // The inverse of the tab, and why the three selectors are not one
2191        // member with a flag.
2192        let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
2193        assert!(css.contains(".segment {\n    background: var(--surface-raised);"));
2194        assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.unchosen(), Depth::Raised);
2195        assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2196    }
2197
2198    #[test]
2199    fn a_rows_actions_are_shown_at_rest() {
2200        let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2201
2202        // The hover reveal is gone, and with it every escape it needed. What
2203        // it hid was hidden from pointer users alone, who are the ones
2204        // scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
2205        assert!(!css.contains("opacity"), "{css}");
2206        assert!(!css.contains("pointer-events"), "{css}");
2207        assert!(!css.contains(":hover"), "{css}");
2208        assert!(!css.contains(":focus-within"), "{css}");
2209
2210        // Nor is it hidden any other way. `display: none` would reflow the row
2211        // and `visibility: hidden` would take the actions out of the focus
2212        // order; the point is that neither is reached for.
2213        assert!(!css.contains("display: none"), "{css}");
2214        assert!(!css.contains("visibility:"), "{css}");
2215    }
2216
2217    #[test]
2218    fn a_figures_tone_lands_on_the_delta_when_there_is_one() {
2219        // 0.13.0. The delta is the part that reads as good or bad; the number
2220        // itself is an ordinary fact. A figure with no delta has nowhere else to
2221        // put the colour, so the value takes it, and `:has` is what lets one
2222        // attribute mean both without the emitter choosing an element.
2223        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2224
2225        assert!(
2226            css.contains(".figure[data-tone=\"success\"] > .figure-change"),
2227            "{css}"
2228        );
2229        assert!(
2230            css.contains(
2231                ".figure[data-tone=\"success\"]:not(:has(> .figure-change)) > .figure-value"
2232            ),
2233            "{css}"
2234        );
2235        // The caption is the noun and never takes the tone.
2236        assert!(
2237            !css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] > .figure-caption"),
2238            "{css}"
2239        );
2240    }
2241
2242    #[test]
2243    fn the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits() {
2244        let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2245        assert!(css.contains(".row-primary {\n    color: var(--content);"));
2246        assert!(css.contains(".row-secondary {\n    color: var(--content-secondary);"));
2247        assert!(css.contains(".row-meta {\n    color: var(--content-muted);"));
2248        // Actions carry controls, not text. Pinning the colour it would inherit
2249        // anyway is louder than saying nothing.
2250        assert!(!css.contains(".row-actions {\n    color:"));
2251    }
2252
2253    #[test]
2254    fn the_token_strip_takes_no_colour_of_its_own() {
2255        // makeover-layout 0.9.0. A token carries its own tone, so a colour on
2256        // the strip would be a rule fighting the things sitting in it -- the
2257        // same reasoning as actions, reached for a different reason.
2258        let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2259        assert!(!css.contains(".row-tokens {\n    color:"));
2260    }
2261
2262    #[test]
2263    fn an_unknown_row_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
2264        // What `#[non_exhaustive]` bought and what it cost. `part_class` can no
2265        // longer be exhaustive, so a member added upstream lands as a bare
2266        // class with no rule instead of stopping the build. Asserting the
2267        // fallback exists is what keeps it from being written as `unreachable!`
2268        // by someone who reads the match as closed.
2269        assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Tokens), "row-tokens");
2270        assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Meta), "row-meta");
2271    }
2272
2273    #[test]
2274    fn a_link_takes_the_action_colour_the_theme_actually_defines() {
2275        // `--action-primary` shipped here for months and no theme has ever
2276        // defined it, so every `.link` dropped its colour declaration outright
2277        // and fell back to inherited text. Nothing caught it because the sheet
2278        // is valid CSS either way; MNW's no-undefined-token lint is what found
2279        // it, 2026-08-14. The hover arm two lines below was always `--action-hover`,
2280        // which is what makes the typo legible in hindsight.
2281        let css = link_rules(&Emit::default());
2282        assert!(css.contains("color: var(--action);"));
2283        assert!(!css.contains("--action-primary"));
2284        assert!(css.contains("color: var(--action-hover);"));
2285    }
2286
2287    #[test]
2288    fn the_progress_trough_is_a_well() {
2289        let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
2290        assert!(css.contains(".progress {"));
2291        assert!(css.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
2292        assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {"));
2293        assert!(css.contains("background: var(--action)"));
2294        // A bare `.fill` would catch things that have nothing to do with
2295        // progress once the sheet lands unprefixed.
2296        assert!(!css.contains("> .fill "));
2297    }
2298
2299    #[test]
2300    fn a_progress_bar_can_carry_a_tone_and_defaults_to_action() {
2301        let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
2302        // Untoned is --action, not Tone::Neutral's content-muted: a bar with no
2303        // status is still reporting progress, and muted would read as disabled.
2304        assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {\n    background: var(--action);"));
2305        assert!(!css.contains("progress-fill {\n    color: var(--content-muted)"));
2306        for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
2307            assert!(
2308                css.contains(&format!(".progress > .progress-fill[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
2309                "missing progress tone {tone}"
2310            );
2311        }
2312        // goingson's two live cases, which is why the tones are emitted at all.
2313        assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] {\n    background: var(--success);"));
2314        assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n    background: var(--danger);"));
2315    }
2316
2317    #[test]
2318    fn no_scrollbar_track_is_emitted() {
2319        // Decision 3's negative half. It was on the phase A list and came off;
2320        // this is what stops it drifting back in.
2321        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2322        assert!(!css.contains("scrollbar"));
2323        assert!(!css.contains("::-webkit"));
2324    }
2325
2326    #[test]
2327    fn an_invalid_field_is_ringed_without_being_lit() {
2328        let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2329        assert!(css.contains(".field {"));
2330        // The ARIA attribute, not a class: one fact, read by both the visual
2331        // and the accessible state, so they cannot drift.
2332        assert!(css.contains(".field[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {"));
2333        assert!(!css.contains(".field.invalid"));
2334        // A flat ring: this edge says "wrong", and a two-tone bevel would have
2335        // it say "raised" at the same time.
2336        assert!(css.contains("0 0 0 1px var(--danger)"));
2337    }
2338
2339    #[test]
2340    fn an_invalid_field_keeps_the_well_underneath_it() {
2341        // box-shadow is not additive. A lone ring replaces the bevel and drops
2342        // the well out from under the field, which is what this emitted before
2343        // 0.5.0 and is the whole reason the rule composes.
2344        let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2345        let invalid = css
2346            .lines()
2347            .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".field[aria-invalid"))
2348            .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2349            .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2350            .join("\n");
2351        assert!(
2352            invalid.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"),
2353            "the well was dropped: {invalid}"
2354        );
2355        assert!(invalid.contains("var(--danger)"));
2356    }
2357
2358    #[test]
2359    fn button_and_card_come_out_identical_by_construction() {
2360        // The duplication phase A deletes. They are the same composition, so
2361        // the only honest way to emit both is from one call.
2362        let opts = Emit::default();
2363        let css = surface_rules(&opts);
2364        assert_eq!(
2365            depth_declarations(Depth::Raised),
2366            depth_declarations(Depth::Raised)
2367        );
2368        assert!(css.contains(".button {"));
2369        assert!(css.contains(".card {"));
2370        assert_eq!(
2371            interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default()).replace("button", "card"),
2372            interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default())
2373        );
2374    }
2375
2376    #[test]
2377    fn a_prefix_reaches_the_component_classes_too() {
2378        let opts = Emit {
2379            class_prefix: "mo-",
2380            ..Emit::default()
2381        };
2382        let css = stylesheet(&opts);
2383        for name in [
2384            "mo-button",
2385            "mo-card",
2386            "mo-field",
2387            "mo-badge",
2388            "mo-chip",
2389            "mo-tab",
2390            "mo-row-primary",
2391            "mo-progress",
2392            "mo-progress-fill",
2393        ] {
2394            assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}")), "unprefixed: {name}");
2395        }
2396        // The bare names must be gone entirely, or a prefixed build still
2397        // collides with the app's own stylesheet.
2398        assert!(!css.contains(".button {"));
2399        assert!(!css.contains(".card {"));
2400        assert!(!css.contains(".badge {"));
2401    }
2402
2403    #[test]
2404    fn the_class_a_renderer_puts_on_an_option_is_the_one_the_rules_key_off() {
2405        // `option_class` is the contract a screen renderer writes markup
2406        // against, and the rules below are the other half of it. They come off
2407        // one mapping now, so this asserts the mapping is the one that reaches
2408        // the stylesheet rather than that two lists still agree.
2409        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2410        for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
2411            let name = option_class(selector);
2412            assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name} {{")), "{name}: {css}");
2413            assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}.chosen {{")), "{name}: {css}");
2414        }
2415        assert_eq!(option_class(Selector::Tabs), "tab");
2416    }
2417
2418    #[test]
2419    fn the_caret_brings_its_own_gap_and_is_the_glyph_the_description_names() {
2420        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2421
2422        // The space is inside the glyph, which is what the other two renderers
2423        // write. Emitted bare, every consumer has to add it back, and the
2424        // obvious way to add it -- `content` in an app stylesheet, which is
2425        // unlayered and so outranks this sheet -- deletes the caret instead.
2426        assert!(css.contains("content: \" \\25B2\";"), "{css}");
2427        assert!(css.contains("content: \" \\25BC\";"), "{css}");
2428        assert!(!css.contains("content: \"\\2"), "{css}");
2429
2430        // The arrows this renderer used to draw alone are gone. Composition
2431        // rather than agreement: the glyph comes from `Sort::glyph`, so a
2432        // fourth spelling cannot appear here without appearing everywhere.
2433        assert!(!css.contains("2191") && !css.contains("2193"), "{css}");
2434        assert!(css.contains(&css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())), "{css}");
2435
2436        // Three states, three tones. An idle sortable heading draws its caret
2437        // now rather than reserving a hidden box for it, so there is no
2438        // visibility to order and no reflow left to guard against; what
2439        // separates the states is the colour, and the sorted arms come after
2440        // the idle one because the specificity is the same.
2441        let idle = css
2442            .find(".table-heading[data-sortable]::after")
2443            .expect("the idle caret is emitted");
2444        let sorted = css
2445            .find(".table-heading[aria-sort=\"ascending\"]::after")
2446            .expect("the ascending caret is emitted");
2447        assert!(idle < sorted, "{css}");
2448        assert!(
2449            css[idle..sorted].contains("color: var(--content-secondary);"),
2450            "{css}"
2451        );
2452        assert!(css[sorted..].contains("color: var(--content);"), "{css}");
2453        assert!(!css.contains("visibility: hidden;"), "{css}");
2454    }
2455
2456    #[test]
2457    fn a_destructive_button_has_somewhere_for_its_tone_to_land() {
2458        let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2459
2460        for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
2461            assert!(
2462                css.contains(&format!(".button[data-tone=\"{}\"]", tone.token())),
2463                "{css}"
2464            );
2465        }
2466        // Colour, not a fill. A red surface is an app's decision about emphasis.
2467        assert!(!css.contains(".button[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n    background"));
2468    }
2469
2470    #[test]
2471    fn a_described_list_is_not_a_bulleted_list() {
2472        let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2473        assert!(css.contains(".list {\n    list-style: none;"), "{css}");
2474    }
2475
2476    #[test]
2477    fn a_table_lays_itself_out_without_being_told_its_columns() {
2478        // The whole point of the CSS table. A described table's columns are
2479        // known at render time, so anything the stylesheet has to be told about
2480        // them would have to travel with the markup.
2481        let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2482
2483        assert!(css.contains(".table {\n    display: table;"), "{css}");
2484        assert!(css.contains("display: table-row;"), "{css}");
2485        assert!(css.contains("display: table-cell;"), "{css}");
2486        assert!(!css.contains("grid-template-columns"), "{css}");
2487    }
2488
2489    #[test]
2490    fn a_control_in_a_cell_is_not_painted_as_text() {
2491        // The point of makeover-layout 0.14.0's CellPart, and the table-side
2492        // twin of `the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits`
2493        // above. One `.cell` and one content colour meant a button in a cell
2494        // inherited it.
2495        let css = table_rules(&Emit::default());
2496
2497        assert!(
2498            css.contains(".cell-value {\n    color: var(--content);"),
2499            "{css}"
2500        );
2501        assert!(!css.contains(".cell-actions {\n    color:"), "{css}");
2502        assert!(!css.contains(".cell-tokens {\n    color:"), "{css}");
2503        assert!(!css.contains(".cell-link {\n    color:"), "{css}");
2504
2505        // The colour is on the part that is text, never on the container. On
2506        // `.cell` it would cascade into the three parts that are not text,
2507        // which is the bug written as one rule.
2508        assert!(!css.contains(".cell {\n    color:"), "{css}");
2509    }
2510
2511    #[test]
2512    fn an_unknown_cell_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
2513        // `part_class`'s obligation, taken on for the table side too. CellPart
2514        // is `#[non_exhaustive]`, so a member added upstream must land as a
2515        // bare class rather than as a build that stops.
2516        assert_eq!(cell_part_class(CellPart::Value), "cell-value");
2517        assert_eq!(cell_part_class(CellPart::Actions), "cell-actions");
2518    }
2519
2520    #[test]
2521    fn a_column_drops_by_its_priority_and_never_by_its_position() {
2522        let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2523
2524        // Optional goes at the narrowest class and secondary goes with it,
2525        // which is `kept_at`'s cutoff walk said as two queries.
2526        let compact = css
2527            .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Compact.media_condition()))
2528            .expect("a compact query");
2529        let medium = css
2530            .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Medium.media_condition()))
2531            .expect("a medium query");
2532        assert!(css[compact..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
2533        assert!(!css[medium..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
2534
2535        // Essential columns are never mentioned, because not being mentioned is
2536        // already what never dropping means.
2537        assert!(!css.contains(".cell-keeps"), "{css}");
2538
2539        // And nothing counts. `nth-child` is the bug the priority vocabulary
2540        // exists to end.
2541        assert!(!css.contains("nth-child"), "{css}");
2542    }
2543
2544    #[test]
2545    fn a_track_places_by_custom_property_and_never_by_a_size() {
2546        let css = track_rules(&Emit::default());
2547
2548        // Placement arrives from the caller, computed once by Track::fraction.
2549        // If either of these becomes a literal, three renderers have started
2550        // disagreeing about where 09:30 is.
2551        assert!(css.contains("top: var(--track-at"), "{css}");
2552        assert!(css.contains("height: var(--track-for"), "{css}");
2553
2554        // Overlap lanes default so an entry naming neither is full width.
2555        assert!(css.contains("--track-lane, 0"), "{css}");
2556        assert!(css.contains("--track-lanes, 1"), "{css}");
2557
2558        // The refusal that matters. A slot height here would be this crate
2559        // deciding how tall a quarter of an hour is, which is the thing
2560        // makeover-geometry owns and the reason `.track` gets no height at all.
2561        assert!(!css.contains("height: var(--track-slot"), "{css}");
2562        for size in ["px", "rem", "em", "vh"] {
2563            let bare = css
2564                .lines()
2565                .filter(|l| !l.contains("var(--"))
2566                .any(|l| l.contains(size));
2567            assert!(!bare, "track_rules named a {size} outside a var(): {css}");
2568        }
2569    }
2570
2571    #[test]
2572    fn a_relaxed_part_clamps_and_a_tight_one_says_nothing() {
2573        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2574        assert!(css.contains(".row-relaxed {"));
2575        assert!(css.contains("-webkit-line-clamp: 2;"));
2576        // The count is `Flow`'s, not this crate's. If the tier ever means three
2577        // lines, this fails here rather than in an app.
2578        assert!(css.contains(&format!("line-clamp: {};", Flow::Relaxed.lines())));
2579        // Tight gets no rule at all: one line is what a run already does, and a
2580        // class per part saying so is a declaration that changes nothing.
2581        assert!(!css.contains("row-tight"));
2582        assert_eq!(crate::list::flow_class(Flow::Relaxed), Some("row-relaxed"));
2583        assert_eq!(crate::list::flow_class(Flow::Tight), None);
2584        // Emitted, therefore checkable: an app's dead-vocabulary seal and the
2585        // overlap check both read `vocabulary::names`, so a class the renderer
2586        // can write and that list does not carry is invisible to both.
2587        assert!(crate::vocabulary::names(&Emit::default()).contains("row-relaxed"));
2588    }
2589
2590    #[test]
2591    fn the_whole_sheet_still_names_every_colour() {
2592        // The crate's founding property, asserted over the component layer and
2593        // not only the primitives.
2594        let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2595        assert!(!css.contains('#'));
2596        assert!(!css.contains("rgb"));
2597        for line in css.lines() {
2598            // Declarations only: a selector or an at-rule can carry a colon of
2599            // its own (`:root`, `:hover`, `@media (hover: hover)`) and declares
2600            // nothing. Keyed on the trailing semicolon rather than on leading
2601            // indentation, which only ever worked as a proxy for nesting depth
2602            // and stopped when the sheet gained a cascade layer around it.
2603            let trimmed = line.trim();
2604            if !trimmed.ends_with(';') {
2605                continue;
2606            }
2607            let Some((_, value)) = trimmed.split_once(": ") else {
2608                continue;
2609            };
2610            if value.contains("var(--") {
2611                continue;
2612            }
2613            // Everything left has to be a keyword, a number or a
2614            // caller-supplied length, never a colour.
2615            //
2616            // The length arm is what the comment above always claimed and the
2617            // list never covered: `border_width` arrives from `Emit` and lands
2618            // bare in the focus ring's offset, where the bevel had only ever
2619            // used it inside an `inset` shadow.
2620            let opts = Emit::default();
2621            assert!(
2622                value.contains("inset")
2623                    || value.contains(opts.border_width)
2624                    || value.contains(opts.focus_width)
2625                    // 0.12.0's two: a sortable header is a control and says so
2626                    // with the pointer, and the caret is this renderer's own
2627                    // expression of `aria-sort`. Neither is a colour, which is
2628                    // what this test is actually about, and neither is a size,
2629                    // which is the other thing this crate must not name. The
2630                    // leading space inside the glyph is the same thing the other
2631                    // two renderers write into theirs, so it is part of the
2632                    // caret rather than spacing this crate decided on.
2633                    || value
2634                        .trim_start_matches('"')
2635                        .trim_start()
2636                        .starts_with("\\2")
2637                    || matches!(
2638                        value.trim_end_matches(';'),
2639                        "0" | "1"
2640                            | "none"
2641                            | "auto"
2642                            | "not-allowed"
2643                            | "pointer"
2644                            // The caret's reserved box. Visibility is presence,
2645                            // not magnitude and not colour.
2646                            | "hidden"
2647                            | "visible"
2648                            // The link's two signals. `underline` is a line and
2649                            // `inherit` defers to whatever the app set, so
2650                            // neither names a colour or a magnitude.
2651                            | "underline"
2652                            | "inherit"
2653                            // The table frame. `display` is structure and not a
2654                            // size; `nowrap` is what makes a content column
2655                            // content. The two widths are the awkward pair and
2656                            // they are still not sizes: `100%` is "all of
2657                            // whatever you were given" and `1%` is the CSS
2658                            // table idiom for "shrink to fit", which is a
2659                            // behaviour spelled as a number because CSS has no
2660                            // keyword for it. Neither names a magnitude, which
2661                            // is the thing this crate leaves to
2662                            // makeover-geometry.
2663                            | "table"
2664                            | "table-row"
2665                            | "table-cell"
2666                            | "nowrap"
2667                            | "100%"
2668                            | "1%"
2669                            // The time axis, 0.42.0. `position` is the one
2670                            // property whose whole job is where a thing sits,
2671                            // which is exactly what this crate spent its life
2672                            // refusing to say -- so it is worth being exact
2673                            // about why these two are not that refusal
2674                            // breaking.
2675                            //
2676                            // Neither names a magnitude. `relative` says the
2677                            // track is what its entries resolve against, and
2678                            // `absolute` says an entry is placed rather than
2679                            // flowed. *Where* each entry lands is
2680                            // `--track-at` and `--track-for`, custom
2681                            // properties the caller sets from
2682                            // `Track::fraction`, and they are skipped by the
2683                            // `var(--` arm above like every other value this
2684                            // crate refuses to decide.
2685                            //
2686                            // The rule that would break the refusal is a slot
2687                            // height, and there is none: the track's height is
2688                            // the app's, so the percentages have something to
2689                            // resolve against and this crate still never says
2690                            // how tall a day is.
2691                            | "relative"
2692                            | "absolute"
2693                            // A run's five, 0.49.0. `flex`, `wrap` and
2694                            // `center` are structure and alignment, the same
2695                            // reading `table` gets: which way members are laid
2696                            // out and how they line up, never how much of
2697                            // anything.
2698                            //
2699                            // The two intrinsic keywords are the interesting
2700                            // pair and they are the opposite of a size. A
2701                            // magnitude is a number somebody chose;
2702                            // `min-content` and `max-content` are the browser
2703                            // being asked what the members themselves come to,
2704                            // which is the derived minimum the room ruling
2705                            // requires and the reason no breakpoint appears
2706                            // anywhere in these rules. `1 1 max-content` is
2707                            // grow, shrink and that basis, so its two digits
2708                            // are ratios rather than lengths.
2709                            | "flex"
2710                            | "wrap"
2711                            | "center"
2712                            | "min-content"
2713                            | "1 1 max-content"
2714                            // A picture's three, 0.36.0. `block` is structure
2715                            // for the reason `table` is: an inline image sits
2716                            // on the baseline and carries a descender's worth
2717                            // of space under it, which is a fact about
2718                            // replaced elements rather than a size this crate
2719                            // chose. `cover` and `contain` are `Fit`'s two
2720                            // named members reaching CSS unchanged, which is
2721                            // an intent arriving rather than a value being
2722                            // picked.
2723                            | "block"
2724                            | "cover"
2725                            | "contain"
2726                            // A relaxed part's three, and the third is the
2727                            // awkward one. `-webkit-box` and `vertical` are
2728                            // structure: they say the part is a box of lines
2729                            // stacked downward, which is the only way CSS lets
2730                            // anyone ask for a clamp at all.
2731                            //
2732                            // `2` is a count of lines, not a length. The
2733                            // distinction this crate holds is between naming a
2734                            // magnitude -- a padding, a height, a font size,
2735                            // all of which belong to makeover-geometry -- and
2736                            // naming how many of something there are. A line's
2737                            // height is still the app's, so two lines is
2738                            // whatever two of the app's lines come to, and
2739                            // nothing here decides how tall that is. It is also
2740                            // not a value picked here: it is `Flow::Relaxed`'s
2741                            // own answer arriving unchanged, the same way
2742                            // `cover` and `contain` are `Fit`'s.
2743                            | "-webkit-box"
2744                            | "vertical"
2745                            | "2"
2746                    ),
2747                "unrecognised literal value: {line}"
2748            );
2749        }
2750    }
2751
2752    #[test]
2753    fn flat_emits_nothing_at_all() {
2754        assert_eq!(depth_class(Depth::Flat, &Emit::default()), None);
2755        assert!(!depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("flat"));
2756    }
2757
2758    #[test]
2759    fn a_prefix_namespaces_every_class() {
2760        let opts = Emit {
2761            class_prefix: "mo-",
2762            ..Emit::default()
2763        };
2764        let css = depth_rules(&opts);
2765        assert!(css.contains(".mo-raised {"));
2766        assert!(css.contains(".mo-well {"));
2767        assert!(!css.contains(".raised {"));
2768    }
2769
2770    #[test]
2771    fn the_border_width_is_the_callers() {
2772        let opts = Emit {
2773            border_width: "2px",
2774            ..Emit::default()
2775        };
2776        assert!(bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts).contains("inset 2px 2px 0"));
2777    }
2778
2779    #[test]
2780    fn edges_agree_with_the_description() {
2781        // Not a tautology: it is the guard that a CSS-shaped convenience never
2782        // quietly reverses which side is lit.
2783        let (tl, br) = Bevel::Raised.edges();
2784        assert_eq!(tl.token(), Edge::Light.token());
2785        assert_eq!(br.token(), Edge::Dark.token());
2786    }
2787}