makeover_webview/lib.rs
1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet only
19//!
20//! This emits component CSS and no markup, deliberately. GoingsOn has 145
21//! `innerHTML` sites and Balanced Breakfast 175 `createElement` sites; moving
22//! markup is a migration, while adopting a generated stylesheet is a deletion.
23//! The apps keep every line of their markup and gain the classes.
24//!
25//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
26//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
27//!
28//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
29//!
30//! Decided 2026-07-29 against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a
31//! component list. The useful finding there was that `.btn` (line 644),
32//! `.card` (768) and `.tag, .badge` (882) each hand-write the same
33//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
34//!
35//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
36//! not be described as a pure deletion:
37//!
38//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
39//! [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
40//! will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
41//! and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
42//! where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
43//! hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
44//! that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
45//! answer is there and not here.
46//! - **Badges go flat.** See [`token_rules`].
47//!
48//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
49//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
50//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
51//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
52//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
53//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
54//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
55//!
56//! # Substitution, three ways
57//!
58//! `Fill::Well` has no colour on makeover before 2.3.0, and each renderer
59//! answers that differently, which is the evidence that dropping
60//! `Fill::fallback` from the description was right:
61//!
62//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
63//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
64//! terminal would quantise the two together.
65//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
66//! var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
67//! decides anything.
68
69#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
70
71use makeover_layout::{Bevel, Depth, Fill, Intent, RowPart, Selector, Token, Tone};
72use std::fmt::Write as _;
73
74/// How the emitted CSS is shaped.
75#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
76pub struct Emit {
77 /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
78 ///
79 /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: border widths belong to
80 /// `makeover-geometry` and will come from there once it carries them.
81 pub border_width: &'static str,
82 /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
83 pub class_prefix: &'static str,
84}
85
86impl Default for Emit {
87 fn default() -> Self {
88 Self {
89 border_width: "1px",
90 class_prefix: "",
91 }
92 }
93}
94
95/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
96#[must_use]
97pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
98 match bevel {
99 Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
100 Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
101 }
102}
103
104/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
105/// the intent may be absent.
106///
107/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
108/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
109#[must_use]
110pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
111 match fill {
112 Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
113 other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
114 }
115}
116
117/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
118///
119/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
120/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
121/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
122/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
123#[must_use]
124pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
125 let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
126 let w = opts.border_width;
127 format!(
128 "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} -{w} 0 var(--{})",
129 top_left.token(),
130 bottom_right.token()
131 )
132}
133
134/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
135///
136/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
137/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
138/// without the fill reads the property directly.
139#[must_use]
140pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
141 let mut css = String::new();
142 for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset] {
143 let _ = writeln!(
144 css,
145 " {}: {};",
146 bevel_var(bevel),
147 bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
148 );
149 }
150 css
151}
152
153/// The class name for a depth.
154#[must_use]
155pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
156 let name = match depth {
157 Depth::Flat => return None,
158 Depth::Raised => "raised",
159 Depth::Well => "well",
160 Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
161 };
162 Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
163}
164
165/// A prefixed class name.
166fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
167 format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix)
168}
169
170/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
171///
172/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
173/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
174/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
175/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
176///
177/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
178/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both, which this did before makeover-layout
179/// 0.3.0, silently dropped the fill for exactly that case. Independent does not
180/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
181/// disagree about what the region is.
182#[must_use]
183pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
184 let mut css = String::new();
185 if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
186 let _ = writeln!(css, " background: {};", fill_var(fill));
187 }
188 if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
189 let _ = writeln!(css, " box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
190 }
191 css
192}
193
194/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
195/// nothing.
196#[must_use]
197pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
198 let body = depth_declarations(depth);
199 if body.is_empty() {
200 return String::new();
201 }
202 format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
203}
204
205/// Hover and pressed, for a selector that answers a click.
206///
207/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
208/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
209/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
210/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
211/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
212/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
213///
214/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
215/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
216/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
217/// consumed until now.
218#[must_use]
219pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str) -> String {
220 format!(
221 ".{selector}:hover {{\n background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n{}",
222 depth_rule(&format!("{selector}:active"), Depth::Raised.pressed())
223 )
224}
225
226/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
227///
228/// A pressed rule rides along with the raised one, because the cascade can
229/// carry a state that an immediate-mode renderer has to resolve per call site.
230/// That is the one thing this renderer gets for free and the others do not.
231#[must_use]
232pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
233 let mut css = String::new();
234 for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
235 let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
236 continue;
237 };
238 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
239 }
240 if let Some(raised) = depth_class(Depth::Raised, opts) {
241 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&raised));
242 }
243 css
244}
245
246/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
247///
248/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
249/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
250/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
251/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
252/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
253/// drifting apart again.
254fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
255 let mut css = String::new();
256 for name in ["button", "card"] {
257 let c = class(name, opts);
258 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, Depth::Raised));
259 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c));
260 }
261
262 let field = class("field", opts);
263 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
264 // `Field::invalid` marks the whole group rather than only the message, so
265 // the ring goes on the control. Flat, not a two-tone bevel: this edge is
266 // saying "wrong", and lighting one side of it would have it say "raised"
267 // at the same time.
268 let _ = writeln!(
269 css,
270 ".{field}.invalid {{\n box-shadow: inset 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
271 opts.border_width
272 );
273 css
274}
275
276/// Badges and chips.
277///
278/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
279/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
280/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
281/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
282/// decide which of the two it always was.
283///
284/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
285/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
286/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
287fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
288 let mut css = String::new();
289
290 // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
291 // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
292 let badge = class("badge", opts);
293 let _ = writeln!(
294 css,
295 ".{badge} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
296 Tone::Neutral.token()
297 );
298 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
299 let _ = writeln!(
300 css,
301 ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
302 tone.token()
303 );
304 }
305
306 // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
307 // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
308 // markup and waits for phase B.
309 let chip = class("chip", opts);
310 let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
311 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
312 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip));
313 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
314 &format!("{chip}.latched"),
315 unlatched.depth(true),
316 ));
317 css
318}
319
320/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
321///
322/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
323/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
324/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
325/// three are not one member with a flag.
326///
327/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
328/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
329///
330/// Both states emit as of makeover-layout 0.3.0. Before it the description
331/// named only the chosen option, so an unchosen one fell through to
332/// [`Depth::Flat`] and nothing was drawn for it, which left goingson's tab
333/// strip hand-writing the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
334fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
335 let mut css = String::new();
336 for (selector, name) in [
337 (Selector::Tabs, "tab"),
338 (Selector::Segmented, "segment"),
339 (Selector::Toggle, "toggle"),
340 ] {
341 let c = class(name, opts);
342 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
343 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c));
344 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
345 }
346 css
347}
348
349/// The four parts of a list row.
350fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
351 let mut css = String::new();
352 let row = class("row", opts);
353 for part in [
354 RowPart::Primary,
355 RowPart::Secondary,
356 RowPart::Meta,
357 RowPart::Actions,
358 ] {
359 let name = match part {
360 RowPart::Primary => "row-primary",
361 RowPart::Secondary => "row-secondary",
362 RowPart::Meta => "row-meta",
363 RowPart::Actions => "row-actions",
364 };
365 let c = class(name, opts);
366
367 // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
368 // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
369 // would be louder than saying nothing.
370 if !matches!(part, RowPart::Actions) {
371 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
372 }
373
374 if part.revealed_on_hover() {
375 // Hidden rather than absent: the row must not change height when
376 // the pointer arrives. `focus-within` carries the keyboard, which
377 // hover on its own would lock out.
378 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n visibility: hidden;\n}}");
379 let _ = writeln!(
380 css,
381 ".{row}:hover .{c},\n.{row}:focus-within .{c} {{\n visibility: visible;\n}}"
382 );
383 }
384 }
385 css
386}
387
388/// The progress trough, which has nothing behind it in the description.
389///
390/// Renderer-local chrome, on the same licence the skeletons hold as the
391/// webview's expression of `Readiness::Pending`: a determinate bar is a shape
392/// CSS draws readily and a terminal would rather not be told about. It earns
393/// the place empirically, goingson having grown four independent progress bars
394/// before anything named one.
395///
396/// The trough is a [`Depth::Well`], the same reading a text field gets:
397/// something with its content down inside it.
398fn progress_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
399 let progress = class("progress", opts);
400 // `progress-fill` rather than a bare `fill`: an unprefixed build claims
401 // these names in the app's own stylesheet, and `.fill` is grabby enough to
402 // catch things that have nothing to do with progress. goingson already
403 // calls it `.progress-fill`, so this is also the name that deletes.
404 let fill = class("progress-fill", opts);
405 format!(
406 "{}.{progress} > .{fill} {{\n background: var(--action);\n}}\n",
407 depth_rule(&progress, Depth::Well)
408 )
409}
410
411/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
412///
413/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
414/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
415/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
416#[must_use]
417pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
418 let mut css = String::new();
419 css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
420 css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
421 css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
422 css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
423 css.push_str(&progress_rules(opts));
424 css
425}
426
427/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, with
428/// a generated-file banner.
429#[must_use]
430pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
431 format!(
432 "/* Generated by makeover-webview from makeover-layout. Do not edit.\n \
433 Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n \
434 them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout. */\n\
435 :root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
436 bevel_properties(opts),
437 depth_rules(opts),
438 component_rules(opts)
439 )
440}
441
442#[cfg(test)]
443mod tests {
444 use super::*;
445 use makeover_layout::Edge;
446
447 #[test]
448 fn the_emitted_bevel_matches_what_the_apps_already_hand_write() {
449 // Balanced Breakfast's styles.css, verbatim. Adoption has to be a
450 // deletion, not a redesign, or nobody will take it.
451 let opts = Emit::default();
452 assert_eq!(
453 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts),
454 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-light), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-dark)"
455 );
456 assert_eq!(
457 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Inset, &opts),
458 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-dark), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-light)"
459 );
460 }
461
462 #[test]
463 fn no_colour_ever_reaches_the_output() {
464 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
465 assert!(!css.contains('#'), "a hex literal escaped into the CSS");
466 assert!(
467 !css.contains("rgb"),
468 "a colour function escaped into the CSS"
469 );
470 // Every colour is named, never resolved.
471 assert!(css.contains("var(--surface-raised)"));
472 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-light)"));
473 }
474
475 #[test]
476 fn a_well_falls_back_through_css_rather_than_through_rust() {
477 assert_eq!(
478 fill_var(Fill::Well),
479 "var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"
480 );
481 // Nothing else needs one.
482 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Raised), "var(--surface-raised)");
483 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Page), "var(--surface-page)");
484 }
485
486 #[test]
487 fn raised_and_well_do_not_collapse_onto_each_other() {
488 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
489 assert!(css.contains(".raised {"));
490 assert!(css.contains(".well {"));
491 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"));
492 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"));
493 }
494
495 #[test]
496 fn the_cascade_carries_the_pressed_state() {
497 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
498 // The one thing this renderer gets free that the other two resolve by
499 // hand, eighteen call sites deep in audiofiles' case.
500 assert!(css.contains(".raised:active {"));
501 }
502
503 #[test]
504 fn pressing_moves_the_fill_and_not_only_the_edge() {
505 // The decision-1 guard, and the regression that mattered: emitting the
506 // bevel flip alone is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
507 // var(--surface-sunken)` on .btn, .card and .tag/.badge alike, so none
508 // of the three could be deleted.
509 let pressed = interactive_rules("button");
510 assert!(pressed.contains(".button:active {"));
511 assert!(
512 pressed.contains("background: var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"),
513 "pressed dropped its fill: {pressed}"
514 );
515 assert!(pressed.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
516 }
517
518 #[test]
519 fn pressed_takes_its_fill_from_the_description_not_from_the_app() {
520 // goingson presses to --surface-sunken. The description says a pressed
521 // raised region reads as a well, and makeover says outright that
522 // surface-sunken cannot serve as one, so the app is the thing that
523 // moves.
524 //
525 // Scoped to the pressed rules rather than to the whole sheet: since
526 // makeover-layout 0.3.0 an unchosen tab is legitimately
527 // --surface-sunken, so the token appearing somewhere in the output no
528 // longer means the app's choice leaked in.
529 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
530 let mut checked = 0;
531 for rule in css.split("}\n") {
532 if !rule.contains(":active") {
533 continue;
534 }
535 checked += 1;
536 assert!(
537 !rule.contains("surface-sunken"),
538 "a pressed rule took the app's fill: {rule}"
539 );
540 }
541 assert!(checked > 0, "no pressed rules found to check");
542 assert_eq!(
543 Depth::Raised.pressed().fill(),
544 Some(Fill::Well),
545 "the description changed under us"
546 );
547 }
548
549 #[test]
550 fn hover_resolves_against_the_token_makeover_already_derives() {
551 let css = interactive_rules("card");
552 assert!(css.contains(".card:hover {"));
553 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--hover-surface)"));
554 // Not the app's choice, which was --surface-overlay.
555 assert!(!css.contains("surface-overlay"));
556 }
557
558 #[test]
559 fn a_badge_gets_no_edge_and_no_fill() {
560 // Decision 2, and the one visible redesign in phase A. Token::Badge is
561 // Flat: an edge on a label says it can be pressed.
562 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
563 let badge = css
564 .lines()
565 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".badge {"))
566 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
567 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
568 .join("\n");
569 assert!(!badge.contains("box-shadow"), "badge kept an edge: {badge}");
570 assert!(!badge.contains("background"), "badge kept a fill: {badge}");
571 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(false), Depth::Flat);
572 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(true), Depth::Flat);
573 }
574
575 #[test]
576 fn a_badge_carries_a_tone_and_neutral_is_the_bare_class() {
577 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
578 // Neutral is the absence of a status, not a status named "none".
579 assert!(css.contains(".badge {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
580 assert!(!css.contains("data-tone=\"content-muted\""));
581 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
582 assert!(
583 css.contains(&format!(".badge[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
584 "missing tone {tone}"
585 );
586 assert!(css.contains(&format!("color: var(--{tone})")));
587 }
588 }
589
590 #[test]
591 fn a_chip_is_raised_and_latches_into_a_well() {
592 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
593 assert!(css.contains(".chip {"));
594 assert!(css.contains(".chip.latched {"));
595 assert!(css.contains(".chip:active {"));
596 // The whole difference from a badge: it answers a click.
597 assert!(Token::Chip { removable: false }.interactive());
598 assert!(!Token::Badge.interactive());
599 }
600
601 #[test]
602 fn only_a_tab_comes_forward_when_chosen() {
603 // The folder semantic. Collapsing the three selectors would lose it.
604 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
605 assert!(css.contains(".tab.chosen {"));
606 assert!(css.contains(".segment.chosen {"));
607 assert!(css.contains(".toggle.chosen {"));
608 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.chosen(), Depth::Raised);
609 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
610 assert_eq!(Selector::Toggle.chosen(), Depth::Well);
611
612 let tab = css
613 .lines()
614 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".tab.chosen {"))
615 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
616 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
617 .join("\n");
618 assert!(tab.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"), "tab was held in: {tab}");
619 }
620
621 #[test]
622 fn an_unchosen_tab_recedes_without_looking_picked() {
623 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
624 // Recessed by colour and given no edge. An edge would make every option
625 // look picked; flat would leave the chosen one nothing to come forward
626 // from, which is the gap makeover-layout 0.3.0 closed.
627 assert!(
628 css.contains(".tab {\n background: var(--surface-sunken);\n}"),
629 "unchosen tab is not recessed: {css}"
630 );
631 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.unchosen(), Depth::Sunken);
632 assert!(css.contains(".tab:hover {"));
633 }
634
635 #[test]
636 fn a_segment_stands_up_so_the_chosen_one_can_be_held_in() {
637 // The inverse of the tab, and why the three selectors are not one
638 // member with a flag.
639 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
640 assert!(css.contains(".segment {\n background: var(--surface-raised);"));
641 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.unchosen(), Depth::Raised);
642 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
643 }
644
645 #[test]
646 fn row_actions_are_revealed_without_moving_the_row() {
647 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
648 assert!(css.contains(".row-actions {\n visibility: hidden;"));
649 // Not display:none, which would reflow the row under the pointer.
650 assert!(!css.contains("display: none"));
651 // Hover alone would lock the keyboard out.
652 assert!(css.contains(".row:focus-within .row-actions"));
653 assert!(RowPart::Actions.revealed_on_hover());
654 }
655
656 #[test]
657 fn the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits() {
658 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
659 assert!(css.contains(".row-primary {\n color: var(--content);"));
660 assert!(css.contains(".row-secondary {\n color: var(--content-secondary);"));
661 assert!(css.contains(".row-meta {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
662 // Actions carry controls, not text. Pinning the colour it would inherit
663 // anyway is louder than saying nothing.
664 assert!(!css.contains(".row-actions {\n color:"));
665 }
666
667 #[test]
668 fn the_progress_trough_is_a_well() {
669 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
670 assert!(css.contains(".progress {"));
671 assert!(css.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
672 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {"));
673 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--action)"));
674 // A bare `.fill` would catch things that have nothing to do with
675 // progress once the sheet lands unprefixed.
676 assert!(!css.contains("> .fill "));
677 }
678
679 #[test]
680 fn no_scrollbar_track_is_emitted() {
681 // Decision 3's negative half. It was on the phase A list and came off;
682 // this is what stops it drifting back in.
683 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
684 assert!(!css.contains("scrollbar"));
685 assert!(!css.contains("::-webkit"));
686 }
687
688 #[test]
689 fn an_invalid_field_is_ringed_without_being_lit() {
690 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
691 assert!(css.contains(".field {"));
692 assert!(css.contains(".field.invalid {"));
693 // A flat ring: this edge says "wrong", and a two-tone bevel would have
694 // it say "raised" at the same time.
695 assert!(css.contains("inset 0 0 0 1px var(--danger)"));
696 }
697
698 #[test]
699 fn button_and_card_come_out_identical_by_construction() {
700 // The duplication phase A deletes. They are the same composition, so
701 // the only honest way to emit both is from one call.
702 let opts = Emit::default();
703 let css = surface_rules(&opts);
704 assert_eq!(
705 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised),
706 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised)
707 );
708 assert!(css.contains(".button {"));
709 assert!(css.contains(".card {"));
710 assert_eq!(
711 interactive_rules("button").replace("button", "card"),
712 interactive_rules("card")
713 );
714 }
715
716 #[test]
717 fn a_prefix_reaches_the_component_classes_too() {
718 let opts = Emit {
719 class_prefix: "mo-",
720 ..Emit::default()
721 };
722 let css = stylesheet(&opts);
723 for name in [
724 "mo-button",
725 "mo-card",
726 "mo-field",
727 "mo-badge",
728 "mo-chip",
729 "mo-tab",
730 "mo-row-primary",
731 "mo-progress",
732 "mo-progress-fill",
733 ] {
734 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}")), "unprefixed: {name}");
735 }
736 // The bare names must be gone entirely, or a prefixed build still
737 // collides with the app's own stylesheet.
738 assert!(!css.contains(".button {"));
739 assert!(!css.contains(".card {"));
740 assert!(!css.contains(".badge {"));
741 }
742
743 #[test]
744 fn the_whole_sheet_still_names_every_colour() {
745 // The crate's founding property, asserted over the component layer and
746 // not only the primitives.
747 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
748 assert!(!css.contains('#'));
749 assert!(!css.contains("rgb"));
750 for line in css.lines() {
751 // Declarations only: a selector or an at-rule can carry a colon of
752 // its own (`:root`, `:hover`) and declares nothing.
753 let declaration = line.strip_prefix(" ").map(str::trim);
754 let Some(Some((_, value))) = declaration.map(|d| d.split_once(": ")) else {
755 continue;
756 };
757 if value.contains("var(--") {
758 continue;
759 }
760 // Everything left has to be a keyword or a caller-supplied length,
761 // never a colour.
762 assert!(
763 value.contains("hidden")
764 || value.contains("visible")
765 || value.contains("inset"),
766 "unrecognised literal value: {line}"
767 );
768 }
769 }
770
771 #[test]
772 fn flat_emits_nothing_at_all() {
773 assert_eq!(depth_class(Depth::Flat, &Emit::default()), None);
774 assert!(!depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("flat"));
775 }
776
777 #[test]
778 fn a_prefix_namespaces_every_class() {
779 let opts = Emit {
780 class_prefix: "mo-",
781 ..Emit::default()
782 };
783 let css = depth_rules(&opts);
784 assert!(css.contains(".mo-raised {"));
785 assert!(css.contains(".mo-well {"));
786 assert!(!css.contains(".raised {"));
787 }
788
789 #[test]
790 fn the_border_width_is_the_callers() {
791 let opts = Emit {
792 border_width: "2px",
793 ..Emit::default()
794 };
795 assert!(bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts).contains("inset 2px 2px 0"));
796 }
797
798 #[test]
799 fn edges_agree_with_the_description() {
800 // Not a tautology: it is the guard that a CSS-shaped convenience never
801 // quietly reverses which side is lit.
802 let (tl, br) = Bevel::Raised.edges();
803 assert_eq!(tl.token(), Edge::Light.token());
804 assert_eq!(br.token(), Edge::Dark.token());
805 }
806}