makeover_webview/lib.rs
1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet
19//!
20//! This module emits component CSS and no markup, deliberately. GoingsOn has
21//! 145 `innerHTML` sites and Balanced Breakfast 175 `createElement` sites, so
22//! moving markup is a migration where adopting a generated stylesheet is not.
23//! The apps keep every line of their markup and gain the classes.
24//!
25//! It is not a deletion either, which this header claimed until the measurement
26//! came in. Adoption across goingson removed 49 declarations net and *added* 25
27//! lines: a rule loses its depth declarations and gains a variant selector next
28//! to it, so the file stays the same size. What phase A moves is where depth is
29//! defined, not how much CSS exists. Numbers and method in the wiki note under
30//! "The deletion test, run".
31//!
32//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
33//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
34//!
35//! # Phase B: the markup, one description at a time
36//!
37//! [`form`] renders [`makeover_layout::Field`], which is the half of phase B
38//! whose description is settled. It emits strings, because both apps
39//! interpolate their fields into larger string-built forms and returning nodes
40//! would rewrite those too. It owns its own escaping, on the reasoning in that
41//! module: a Rust encoder can cover element text and attribute values with one
42//! function, where the apps need four and have to choose correctly at every
43//! call site.
44//!
45//! [`list`] is the other half: column tracks, the narrowing rules, and the cell
46//! containers a row is made of. It stops at the cell boundary and does not
47//! render what goes inside one, on the reasoning in that module. So phase B is
48//! now the frame around content in both directions, and what an app still owns
49//! is the content itself.
50//!
51//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
52//!
53//! Decided 2026-07-29 against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a
54//! component list. The useful finding there was that `.btn` (line 644),
55//! `.card` (768) and `.tag, .badge` (882) each hand-write the same
56//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
57//!
58//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
59//! not be described as a pure deletion:
60//!
61//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
62//! [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
63//! will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
64//! and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
65//! where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
66//! hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
67//! that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
68//! answer is there and not here.
69//! - **Badges go flat.** See [`token_rules`].
70//!
71//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
72//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
73//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
74//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
75//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
76//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
77//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
78//!
79//! # 0.10.0: the states this crate used to leave to its consumers
80//!
81//! [`interactive_rules`] emitted hover and pressed and stopped, because
82//! `makeover-layout` modelled no interaction state. Focus and disabled were
83//! therefore unsayable, and every app completed the primitive from outside the
84//! only way that works: by out-specifying a rule it does not own. goingson
85//! carries 19 such rules and the MNW server 21, and the three focus rings do
86//! not match each other.
87//!
88//! That also blocked the cascade-layer work outright. An app that declares
89//! `@layer` puts its own rules in a named layer, and unlayered declarations
90//! outrank every named layer regardless of specificity, so all of those
91//! overrides lose in the commit that adopts layers. They cannot simply be
92//! deleted, because they are the only thing supplying the missing states.
93//! Emitting the states here is what turns that adoption into a deletion.
94//!
95//! Four states now, in emission order, and the order is load-bearing: they are
96//! all specificity (0,2,0), so disabled beats hover by coming last and by
97//! nothing else. Nothing here reaches for `:not(:disabled)`, which would raise
98//! a selector this crate will shortly be wrapping in its own layer.
99//!
100//! Hover additionally sits inside a capability query now. `makeover-touch`
101//! answers whether a fingertip has hover and `makeover-geometry` spells the
102//! condition; this crate asks and does not decide. goingson's section 60 exists
103//! solely to take the hover state back on touch, which is a fight it should
104//! never have been handed.
105//!
106//! # 0.11.0: the layer contract
107//!
108//! [`stylesheet`] emits into the `makeover` cascade layer ([`CSS_LAYER`], which
109//! lives in `makeover-geometry` because that is the one crate every CSS emitter
110//! in the family already depends on). `makeover-geometry` 0.6.0 does the same
111//! for `geometry.css`.
112//!
113//! The cascade resolves origin and importance, then layer, then specificity,
114//! then source order, and **unlayered normal declarations outrank every named
115//! layer**. So before this, an app that declared `@layer base, components,
116//! responsive` put every rule it owns into a named layer and lost all of them to
117//! this unlayered file, regardless of specificity and regardless of loading
118//! last. Nothing errors when that happens: the CSS is valid, the minifier is
119//! happy, and buttons and badges look subtly wrong.
120//!
121//! That is why the layer belongs here rather than in each app. An app cannot fix
122//! it from its own stylesheet, because the fix is to layer the file it does not
123//! own.
124//!
125//! **What it flips**, and the reason each app wants a look when it bumps the
126//! pin: a generated rule that currently beats an app rule by being more specific
127//! stops beating it. The direction is always "the app wins", which is what the
128//! apps already assume, but a hand-written rule an app thought was dead can come
129//! back to life.
130//!
131//! An app should declare the order once, or the layer's position is decided by
132//! whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:
133//!
134//! ```css
135//! @layer makeover, base, components, responsive;
136//! ```
137//!
138//! [`in_css_layer`] is re-exported for an app that assembles its own stylesheet
139//! from this crate's pieces. goingson builds `tables.css` in its own `build.rs`
140//! out of [`list::narrowing_css`] and [`list::grid_template_columns`], and those
141//! rules are as generated as the ones here, so they belong in the same layer and
142//! this crate cannot put them there on the app's behalf.
143//!
144//! # 0.12.0: the ring gets its own width
145//!
146//! [`focus_rule`] reused [`Emit::border_width`] and emitted a 1px ring. That was
147//! an implementation convenience dressed as consistency with the invalid-field
148//! ring: a bevel and a focus indicator answer different questions, and only one
149//! of them has to be noticed from across a desk.
150//!
151//! Caught while adopting 0.11.0 into goingson, by the check the adoption tasks
152//! ask for. Every consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose
153//! at least 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
154//! goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve selectors. The
155//! design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px, so deleting the app
156//! rules in favour of it would have thinned the focus indicator everywhere.
157//!
158//! [`Emit::focus_width`] now carries it, defaulting to `2px`, and the offset is
159//! the same magnitude with its sign off the depth. Both values are the measured
160//! consensus rather than a new opinion.
161//!
162//! # 0.23.0: a table lays itself out, and a row shows its controls
163//!
164//! Three things a description could say and this renderer had no rule for,
165//! found together by rendering the MNW server's SSH-keys settings tab through
166//! `quasi` and preferring the hand-written Askama original.
167//!
168//! **A table had no layout at all.** [`list::narrowing_css`] emits the track
169//! list, and it has to be called with the columns, so it works where the
170//! columns are known at build time: goingson builds `tables.css` in its own
171//! `build.rs` and is untouched. A table a description produced knows its
172//! columns at render time, and the rules would have had to travel with the
173//! markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs `style-src
174//! 'unsafe-inline'` that the MNW server is working to drop, or the head, which
175//! an htmx fragment swap does not carry. [`table_rules`] lays a table out with
176//! `display: table` instead, which aligns columns across rows knowing nothing
177//! about how many there are. [`Priority`](makeover_layout::Priority) hiding
178//! moves from a generated rule per dropped column to one rule per drop class,
179//! and [`list::column_classes`] is what puts those classes on a cell. A header
180//! row emitted by a renderer's own code should call it too, or the header and
181//! the body disagree about which column just dropped.
182//!
183//! **A destructive button had nowhere for its tone to land.** `.button` carried
184//! no tone, on the reading that a control's colour is its surface. Every
185//! consumer had written the danger rule itself. It joins the badge in taking
186//! the four tones as colour, off `data-tone`.
187//!
188//! **A list rendered as a bulleted list**, because nothing here reset the `ul`
189//! a renderer emits for one.
190//!
191//! `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` also stops being honoured, which its own doc
192//! sanctions: a renderer decides. The rule hid a row's actions until hover,
193//! and every escape it grew was a report that hiding was wrong for somebody:
194//! `focus-within` for the keyboard, the capability gate for a fingertip with no
195//! way to unhide. What survived hid the controls from pointer users alone, who
196//! are the ones scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
197//!
198//! # 0.17.0: the depth classes stop being controls
199//!
200//! [`depth_rules`] gave `.raised` the whole interactive set. A depth is a
201//! statement about shape, so that left the vocabulary with no raised surface
202//! that is merely an object, and an app wanting one had two moves: write its
203//! own class from tokens, or take a control class and cancel the control half.
204//! goingson took the second, in three variants over sixteen elements
205//! (`.card--static` at 14 call sites, `.card--muted` at 2, `.card--shell` at 1),
206//! each re-asserting the resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`.
207//!
208//! Measured before changing it: `.raised` is emitted into goingson, Balanced
209//! Breakfast and the MNW server, and none of the three has a single call site.
210//! The states were unasked-for everywhere at once, and dropping them costs no
211//! migration anywhere.
212//!
213//! `.card` and `.button` are unchanged. They are the same depth *and* controls,
214//! and they take their states from [`surface_rules`], which is where a state
215//! belongs: on the thing that claims to answer a pointer.
216//!
217//! # Substitution, three ways
218//!
219//! `Fill::Well` has no colour on makeover before 2.3.0, and each renderer
220//! answers that differently, which is the evidence that dropping
221//! `Fill::fallback` from the description was right:
222//!
223//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
224//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
225//! terminal would quantise the two together.
226//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
227//! var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
228//! decides anything.
229
230#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
231
232pub mod figure;
233pub mod form;
234pub mod list;
235pub mod meter;
236pub mod placeholder;
237
238use crate::list::part_class;
239use makeover_geometry::{Density, SizeClass};
240// Re-exported rather than redefined. An app assembling its own stylesheet out
241// of this crate's pieces needs the same layer name, and most such apps depend
242// on this crate and not on `makeover-geometry` directly: goingson builds
243// `tables.css` in its own build.rs from [`list::narrowing_css`], and those
244// rules are as generated as the ones here.
245pub use makeover_geometry::{CSS_LAYER, in_css_layer};
246use makeover_layout::{Bevel, Depth, Fill, Intent, RowPart, Selector, State, Token, Tone};
247use makeover_touch::Affordance;
248use std::fmt::Write as _;
249
250/// How the emitted CSS is shaped.
251#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
252pub struct Emit {
253 /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
254 ///
255 /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: border widths belong to
256 /// `makeover-geometry` and will come from there once it carries them.
257 pub border_width: &'static str,
258 /// Focus ring thickness, as a CSS length.
259 ///
260 /// Separate from [`border_width`](Self::border_width), which it reused
261 /// until 0.12.0. That reuse was an implementation convenience dressed as
262 /// consistency, and it emitted a 1px ring: a bevel and a focus indicator
263 /// are answering different questions, and only one of them has to be
264 /// noticed from across a desk.
265 ///
266 /// The default is the measured consensus rather than a new opinion. Every
267 /// consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose at least
268 /// 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
269 /// goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve
270 /// selectors. The design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px.
271 pub focus_width: &'static str,
272 /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
273 pub class_prefix: &'static str,
274}
275
276impl Default for Emit {
277 fn default() -> Self {
278 Self {
279 border_width: "1px",
280 focus_width: "2px",
281 class_prefix: "",
282 }
283 }
284}
285
286/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
287#[must_use]
288pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
289 match bevel {
290 Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
291 Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
292 }
293}
294
295/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
296/// the intent may be absent.
297///
298/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
299/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
300#[must_use]
301pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
302 match fill {
303 Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
304 other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
305 }
306}
307
308/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
309///
310/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
311/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
312/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
313/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
314#[must_use]
315pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
316 let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
317 let w = opts.border_width;
318 format!(
319 "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} -{w} 0 var(--{})",
320 top_left.token(),
321 bottom_right.token()
322 )
323}
324
325/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
326///
327/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
328/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
329/// without the fill reads the property directly.
330#[must_use]
331pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
332 let mut css = String::new();
333 for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset] {
334 let _ = writeln!(
335 css,
336 " {}: {};",
337 bevel_var(bevel),
338 bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
339 );
340 }
341 css.push_str(ELEVATION_PROPERTY);
342 css
343}
344
345/// The cast shadow of a surface that floats over the page.
346///
347/// Composed here for the reason the bevel pair is: `makeover` derives the tone,
348/// this crate owns the geometry, and neither has to know the other's numbers.
349///
350/// **Only for a surface that overlays the page.** A menu, a toast, a popover, a
351/// dropdown. A surface *in* the page takes `.raised` and its bevel, and a rule
352/// that reaches for this on a card or a plate has renamed a literal rather than
353/// replaced it.
354///
355/// Two lengths rather than one, because a single blur reads as a smudge at
356/// plate size and as a halo at menu size. The offset is small and downward: a
357/// Platinum-era menu sits just off the page rather than hovering above it.
358const ELEVATION_PROPERTY: &str =
359 " --elevation-overlay: 0 2px 4px var(--elevation), 0 8px 24px var(--elevation);\n";
360
361/// The class name for a depth.
362#[must_use]
363pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
364 let name = match depth {
365 Depth::Flat => return None,
366 Depth::Raised => "raised",
367 Depth::Well => "well",
368 Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
369 // A depth added to the description since this renderer was last
370 // built. No class, on the same footing as Flat: emitting a name
371 // whose rule body we cannot write would put a class in the markup
372 // that the stylesheet never defines.
373 _ => return None,
374 };
375 Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
376}
377
378/// A prefixed class name.
379fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
380 format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix)
381}
382
383/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
384///
385/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
386/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
387/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
388/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
389///
390/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
391/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both, which this did before makeover-layout
392/// 0.3.0, silently dropped the fill for exactly that case. Independent does not
393/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
394/// disagree about what the region is.
395#[must_use]
396pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
397 let mut css = String::new();
398 if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
399 let _ = writeln!(css, " background: {};", fill_var(fill));
400 }
401 if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
402 let _ = writeln!(css, " box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
403 }
404 css
405}
406
407/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
408/// nothing.
409#[must_use]
410pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
411 let body = depth_declarations(depth);
412 if body.is_empty() {
413 return String::new();
414 }
415 format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
416}
417
418/// The media condition a hover rule has to sit inside, or `None` if hover is
419/// unconditional.
420///
421/// Two crates answer this and neither answer is made here. `makeover-touch`
422/// owns *whether* hover exists at a density, and `makeover-geometry` owns how
423/// that capability is spelled as a media condition. Asking both is what stops
424/// this renderer minting a third opinion, which is what all three apps did:
425/// goingson sniffed the user agent, Balanced Breakfast used `(hover: none)`
426/// alone, and the MNW server had no gate at all.
427///
428/// [`SizeClass`] is required by [`Affordance::available`] and ignored by this
429/// member, which reports as much through `reads_size`. Passing Compact is not
430/// a claim about width; the test below pins that every class agrees.
431fn hover_condition() -> Option<&'static str> {
432 if Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact) {
433 // A fingertip grew a hover state. Nothing to gate, and this renderer
434 // should not invent a reason to gate anyway.
435 None
436 } else {
437 Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition())
438 }
439}
440
441/// Put a rule inside a media query, or leave it alone.
442fn gated(condition: Option<&str>, rule: &str) -> String {
443 let Some(condition) = condition else {
444 return rule.to_string();
445 };
446 let mut css = format!("@media {condition} {{\n");
447 for line in rule.lines() {
448 // Blank lines stay blank. Indenting one leaves trailing whitespace,
449 // which is the sort of thing a formatter later reverts and calls a diff.
450 if line.is_empty() {
451 css.push('\n');
452 } else {
453 let _ = writeln!(css, " {line}");
454 }
455 }
456 css.push_str("}\n");
457 css
458}
459
460/// The keyboard focus ring, placed by the depth it lands on.
461///
462/// One ring for the whole system, because a focus ring's job is to be
463/// recognised and three apps having three of them is the failure. What varies
464/// is where it sits, and that comes off [`Depth`] rather than off a per-
465/// component choice: a well takes the ring inside its own edge, and anything
466/// standing proud of the page takes it outside.
467///
468/// `outline` rather than the composed `box-shadow` the invalid-field ring at
469/// [`field_rules`] uses, and deliberately the one place the two rings are built
470/// differently. A `box-shadow` ring has to restate the bevel beside it, because
471/// `box-shadow` is not additive and a lone ring silently drops the well out
472/// from under the element. That restatement is a second copy of the depth,
473/// living in a different function from the first, and it is exactly the
474/// duplication `Depth` exists to prevent. `outline` occupies its own property,
475/// so the bevel survives untouched and there is nothing to keep in agreement.
476/// They render the same: both are a flush ring one border-width wide.
477#[must_use]
478pub fn focus_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
479 let w = opts.focus_width;
480 // Same magnitude either way, and only the sign comes off the depth. Both
481 // values are what the consumers had already converged on independently:
482 // 2px out is what all three wrote, and 2px in is the MNW server's own
483 // answer for the one inset ring it had.
484 let offset = match depth.bevel() {
485 // Inside the well, clear of its edge rather than painted over it.
486 Some(Bevel::Inset) => format!("calc(-1 * {w})"),
487 // Raised, or no edge at all. Outside, standing off by its own width.
488 _ => w.to_string(),
489 };
490 format!(
491 ".{selector}:focus-visible {{\n outline: {w} solid var(--{});\n outline-offset: {offset};\n}}\n",
492 State::Focus.token()
493 )
494}
495
496/// Present, visible, and not answering.
497///
498/// Matches the ARIA attribute as well as the pseudo-class, because `:disabled`
499/// only matches form elements and half the things this crate emits are not
500/// one: a `div` carrying `.chip` or `.tab` can never be `:disabled`. Keying on
501/// the accessible state is the pattern [`field_rules`] already establishes for
502/// `aria-invalid`, on the reasoning that one fact read by both the styling and
503/// the accessibility tree cannot drift from itself.
504///
505/// The rest depth is re-asserted rather than assumed, because this rule has to
506/// beat the hover and pressed rules above it. It does that on source order at
507/// equal specificity, not by out-specifying them: every rule this function's
508/// caller emits is (0,2,0), and adding a `:not(:disabled)` anywhere would raise
509/// one of them and have to be unpicked when this output moves inside its own
510/// cascade layer.
511#[must_use]
512pub fn disabled_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
513 format!(
514 ".{selector}:disabled,\n.{selector}[aria-disabled=\"true\"] {{\n{} color: var(--{});\n cursor: not-allowed;\n}}\n",
515 depth_declarations(depth),
516 State::Disabled.token()
517 )
518}
519
520/// Every state a selector that answers a click implies: hover, pressed, focus
521/// and disabled, in that order.
522///
523/// Order is the whole cascade mechanism here. All four selectors are
524/// specificity (0,2,0), so disabled wins over hover and pressed by coming last
525/// and by nothing else.
526///
527/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
528/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
529/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
530/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
531/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
532/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
533///
534/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
535/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
536/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
537/// consumed until now. What it *is* gated on is capability, via
538/// [`hover_condition`]. Before that gate existed the apps each wrote their own:
539/// goingson's section 60 exists solely to take back the hover state this
540/// function had just handed it, by out-specifying a rule it does not own.
541///
542/// `depth` is the selector's **rest** depth, used to place the focus ring and
543/// to restore the surface under a disabled control. The pressed rule keeps
544/// inverting from [`Depth::Raised`] regardless, which is what every caller got
545/// before this parameter existed: a tab's unchosen depth is
546/// [`Depth::Sunken`], and `Sunken.pressed()` is `Sunken`, so deriving the press
547/// from the rest depth would leave a tab with no press at all.
548#[must_use]
549pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
550 let mut css = gated(
551 hover_condition(),
552 &format!(".{selector}:hover {{\n background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n"),
553 );
554 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
555 &format!("{selector}:active"),
556 Depth::Raised.pressed(),
557 ));
558 css.push_str(&focus_rule(selector, depth, opts));
559 css.push_str(&disabled_rule(selector, depth));
560 css
561}
562
563/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
564///
565/// A depth and nothing else. `.raised` says a surface sits on what is behind
566/// it, which is a statement about the shape and not about what happens when a
567/// pointer arrives, so it emits no hover, press, focus or disabled rule. The
568/// named surfaces are where interaction lives: `.card` and `.button` are the
569/// same depth *and* controls, and they get their states from
570/// [`surface_rules`].
571///
572/// This class carried the interactive set until 0.17.0, which left the
573/// vocabulary with no raised surface that is merely an object. Consumers that
574/// needed one took a control class and cancelled half of it instead: sixteen
575/// elements in goingson across three `.card--*` variants, each re-asserting the
576/// resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`. Nothing anywhere used
577/// `.raised` itself, so the states were unasked-for in every consumer at once.
578#[must_use]
579pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
580 let mut css = String::new();
581 for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
582 let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
583 continue;
584 };
585 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
586 }
587 css
588}
589
590/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
591///
592/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
593/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
594/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
595/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
596/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
597/// drifting apart again.
598fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
599 let mut css = String::new();
600 for name in ["button", "card"] {
601 let c = class(name, opts);
602 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, Depth::Raised));
603 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, Depth::Raised, opts));
604 }
605
606 let field = class("field", opts);
607 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
608
609 // A field takes focus and refuses input like everything else here, and got
610 // neither until now, which is why all three apps hand-write a focus ring
611 // for it and no two of them match. No hover or pressed: a text field does
612 // not light up under the pointer and does not invert when clicked, so the
613 // two states `interactive_rules` would add are the two it does not have.
614 css.push_str(&focus_rule(&field, Depth::Well, opts));
615 css.push_str(&disabled_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
616
617 // Keyed on the ARIA attribute rather than on a class, so the visual state
618 // and the accessible state cannot drift apart: there is one fact and both
619 // read it. goingson already drove its invalid styling this way and was
620 // right to; the `.invalid` class this emitted before 0.5.0 was a second
621 // place to forget.
622 //
623 // The ring composes *after* the bevel rather than replacing it. box-shadow
624 // is not additive, so a lone ring silently dropped the well out from under
625 // an invalid field. Flat and unlit: this edge is saying "wrong", and
626 // lighting one side would have it say "raised" at the same time.
627 let _ = writeln!(
628 css,
629 ".{field}[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {{\n box-shadow: var({}), 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
630 bevel_var(Bevel::Inset),
631 opts.border_width
632 );
633 css
634}
635
636/// Badges and chips.
637///
638/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
639/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
640/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
641/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
642/// decide which of the two it always was.
643///
644/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
645/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
646/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
647fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
648 let mut css = String::new();
649
650 // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
651 // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
652 let badge = class("badge", opts);
653 let _ = writeln!(
654 css,
655 ".{badge} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
656 Tone::Neutral.token()
657 );
658 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
659 let _ = writeln!(
660 css,
661 ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
662 tone.token()
663 );
664 }
665
666 // A button carries the four tones a badge does. It had none, on the reading
667 // that a control's colour is its surface rather than its text, and that
668 // reading has one hole big enough to matter: the button that destroys
669 // something. Every consumer had written that rule itself, and a description
670 // that says `Tone::Danger` on an act had nowhere for it to land.
671 //
672 // Colour and not a fill, matching the badge. A red surface is a decision
673 // about emphasis that belongs to an app's own layer, and two of them
674 // fighting is worse than neither.
675 let button = class("button", opts);
676 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
677 let _ = writeln!(
678 css,
679 ".{button}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
680 tone.token()
681 );
682 }
683
684 // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
685 // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
686 // markup and waits for phase B.
687 let chip = class("chip", opts);
688 let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
689 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
690 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip, unlatched.depth(false), opts));
691 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
692 &format!("{chip}.latched"),
693 unlatched.depth(true),
694 ));
695 css
696}
697
698/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
699///
700/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
701/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
702/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
703/// three are not one member with a flag.
704///
705/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
706/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
707///
708/// Both states emit as of makeover-layout 0.3.0. Before it the description
709/// named only the chosen option, so an unchosen one fell through to
710/// [`Depth::Flat`] and nothing was drawn for it, which left goingson's tab
711/// strip hand-writing the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
712fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
713 let mut css = String::new();
714 for (selector, name) in [
715 (Selector::Tabs, "tab"),
716 (Selector::Segmented, "segment"),
717 (Selector::Toggle, "toggle"),
718 ] {
719 let c = class(name, opts);
720 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
721 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, selector.unchosen(), opts));
722 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
723 }
724 css
725}
726
727/// The parts of a list row.
728///
729/// The list is written out rather than derived because `RowPart` is
730/// `#[non_exhaustive]` as of makeover-layout 0.9.0, so there is nothing to
731/// iterate. A member added upstream emits no rule until it is named here, which
732/// is the trade `non_exhaustive` makes: a silent gap instead of a build break.
733/// [`part_class`] carries the same list and the same obligation.
734fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
735 let mut css = String::new();
736
737 // The container the rows sit in. Three zeroes and a keyword, all of them
738 // undoing a browser default the description never asked for: a described
739 // list of SSH keys is not a bulleted list, and it rendered as one because
740 // nothing here said otherwise. Not a size: there is no magnitude in it,
741 // which is the line this crate holds.
742 let _ = writeln!(
743 css,
744 ".{} {{\n list-style: none;\n margin: 0;\n padding: 0;\n}}",
745 class("list", opts)
746 );
747
748 for part in [
749 RowPart::Primary,
750 RowPart::Secondary,
751 RowPart::Meta,
752 RowPart::Actions,
753 RowPart::Tokens,
754 RowPart::Proportion,
755 ] {
756 let c = class(part_class(part), opts);
757
758 // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
759 // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
760 // would be louder than saying nothing. Tokens answer alike, for their
761 // own reason: each token carries its own tone, and a colour on the
762 // strip would fight the things sitting in it. A proportion is the same
763 // case again: the meter inside carries the tone.
764 if !matches!(
765 part,
766 RowPart::Actions | RowPart::Tokens | RowPart::Proportion
767 ) {
768 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
769 }
770
771 // `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` is deliberately not honoured, and its
772 // own doc is what sanctions that: "a renderer with no hover shows it
773 // always. That is a renderer decision and this returning `true` does
774 // not forbid it." This renderer now makes the same decision for every
775 // device, and the reasoning is the one the gate had already been
776 // forced into twice.
777 //
778 // The rule was `opacity: 0` gated to pointer devices, revealed on
779 // `:hover` and on `:focus-within`. Each escape it needed was a report
780 // that hiding was wrong for somebody: `focus-within` because tabbing
781 // could never reach an action; the gate because a fingertip had no way
782 // to unhide, which both webview apps had already hand-written
783 // `opacity: 1` to undo. What was left was a control hidden from
784 // exactly one group: people using a pointer, who are also the group
785 // scanning a list to find out what can be done to a row.
786 //
787 // A settings screen is where that reads worst: the whole reason to be
788 // on it is to remove a key, and the button doing so was invisible
789 // until pointed at. A table cell's actions were never hidden, so the
790 // two arrangements now agree.
791 }
792 css
793}
794
795/// The progress trough these rules fill.
796///
797/// This was renderer-local chrome with nothing behind it until makeover-layout
798/// 0.10.0, which is the unusual order: the tones below were emitted for every
799/// bar in the tree while the only way to describe one was to concatenate the
800/// numbers into a heading. `Meter` is the word that arrived late, and
801/// [`meter::meter_html`](crate::meter::meter_html) is what now fills these.
802///
803/// The rules stay a superset of what a description can ask for. An app drawing
804/// its own bar keeps these classes, which is what the four goingson grew
805/// independently were adopted onto.
806///
807/// The trough is a [`Depth::Well`], the same reading a text field gets:
808/// something with its content down inside it.
809fn progress_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
810 let progress = class("progress", opts);
811 // `progress-fill` rather than a bare `fill`: an unprefixed build claims
812 // these names in the app's own stylesheet, and `.fill` is grabby enough to
813 // catch things that have nothing to do with progress. goingson already
814 // calls it `.progress-fill`, so this is also the name that deletes.
815 let fill = class("progress-fill", opts);
816 let mut css = depth_rule(&progress, Depth::Well);
817
818 // The untoned bar is `--action`, not [`Tone::Neutral`]. That is the one
819 // place this differs from the badge rules, and deliberately: a badge with
820 // no status is a muted label, while a bar with no status is still
821 // reporting progress, and `content-muted` would read as disabled.
822 let _ = writeln!(
823 css,
824 ".{progress} > .{fill} {{\n background: var(--action);\n}}"
825 );
826
827 // A bar can be saying something, same as a badge: goingson colours subtask
828 // progress as success and an over-estimate as danger, which is real
829 // information rather than decoration. Emitting the tones is what lets that
830 // survive adoption instead of staying hand-written.
831 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
832 let _ = writeln!(
833 css,
834 ".{progress} > .{fill}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n background: var(--{0});\n}}",
835 tone.token()
836 );
837 }
838 css
839}
840
841/// A strip of figures, and the two spans inside each one.
842///
843/// Colour only, which is the deferral rule applied to a component that badly
844/// wants to break it. A figure reads as a figure because the value is set large
845/// over a small caption, and that is a size: `makeover-geometry` answers how
846/// much space and this crate answers what the thing is. Emitting `font-size`
847/// here would be this crate naming a value, which is the one thing it is defined
848/// by not doing, and `progress_rules` is the precedent — it emits the tones and
849/// never the width, because the width is not its to know.
850///
851/// So the arrangement and the type scale are the app's, and what is generated is
852/// the part an app cannot get right by itself: which of the two spans carries
853/// the tone.
854fn figure_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
855 let figure = class("figure", opts);
856 let value = class("figure-value", opts);
857 let caption = class("figure-caption", opts);
858 let mut css = String::new();
859
860 let _ = writeln!(
861 css,
862 ".{figure} > .{value} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
863 Tone::Neutral.token()
864 );
865 let _ = writeln!(
866 css,
867 ".{figure} > .{caption} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
868 );
869
870 // A toned figure tones the value and never the caption. The caption is the
871 // noun and stays muted; the number is the thing that is saying something.
872 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
873 let _ = writeln!(
874 css,
875 ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{value} {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
876 tone.token()
877 );
878 }
879 css
880}
881
882/// A region's stand-in, and the header of a table that can be reordered.
883///
884/// Both are 0.12.0 members and both are colour and affordance only, which is
885/// where `figure_rules` landed after trying to emit a type scale. How much room
886/// a stand-in gets is a size — goingson has the same one at three, as
887/// `--compact`, `--dashboard` and `--padded` — and a size is
888/// `makeover-geometry`'s question.
889///
890/// The caret is the one thing here that is neither colour nor affordance, and it
891/// is a renderer's own expression rather than a value the description named:
892/// `aria-sort` is what the table actually says, and this turns it into something
893/// visible for everyone not using a screen reader. A terminal draws its own; an
894/// immediate-mode painter draws its own.
895fn state_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
896 let placeholder = class("placeholder", opts);
897 let text = class("placeholder-text", opts);
898 let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
899 let mut css = String::new();
900
901 let _ = writeln!(
902 css,
903 ".{placeholder} > .{text} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
904 );
905 // Only the failure is toned. An empty list is the normal state of a new
906 // install, and `Readiness::tone` is what says so.
907 let _ = writeln!(
908 css,
909 ".{placeholder}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{text} {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
910 Tone::Danger.token()
911 );
912
913 // A header that reorders the table is a control, and the pointer is the
914 // only part of saying so that is not the app's own type and spacing.
915 let _ = writeln!(
916 css,
917 ".{heading}[data-sortable] {{\n cursor: pointer;\n}}"
918 );
919 for (direction, caret) in [("ascending", "\\2191"), ("descending", "\\2193")] {
920 let _ = writeln!(
921 css,
922 ".{heading}[aria-sort=\"{direction}\"]::after {{\n content: \"{caret}\";\n}}"
923 );
924 }
925 css
926}
927
928/// The frame a table sits in.
929///
930/// # Why this is a CSS table and not the grid the rest of the module assumes
931///
932/// A grid row needs `grid-template-columns`, which has to name every column in
933/// order, so it cannot be written without knowing the columns. That is what
934/// [`list::narrowing_css`] is for, and it works: goingson builds `tables.css` in
935/// its own `build.rs` out of it, and nothing here changes that.
936///
937/// It does not work for a table a *description* produced. Those columns are
938/// known at render time rather than at build time, and the rules would have to
939/// travel with the markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs
940/// `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` and so blocks the MNW server's standing plan to
941/// drop it. The head is not an escape: a table swapped in by htmx after a
942/// delete arrives as a fragment with no head at all.
943///
944/// A CSS table aligns its columns across rows knowing nothing about how many
945/// there are, so there is no track list to emit and nothing per-table to carry.
946/// The cost is that a described table cannot take a per-column fixed length,
947/// which costs nothing today: [`Sizing`](list::Sizing) is looked up by column
948/// name and a description carries no lengths to put in it, so every track a
949/// described table could ask for is already content, fill or auto.
950///
951/// [`Priority`] hiding is unchanged in kind. It moves from a generated
952/// `display: none` per dropped column to one rule per drop class, which is the
953/// same fact addressed by class rather than by cutoff, and still never by
954/// position.
955fn table_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
956 let table = class("table", opts);
957 let head = class("table-head", opts);
958 let row = class("table-row", opts);
959 let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
960 let cell = class("cell", opts);
961 let mut css = String::new();
962
963 let _ = writeln!(
964 css,
965 ".{table} {{\n display: table;\n width: 100%;\n}}"
966 );
967 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{head},\n.{row} {{\n display: table-row;\n}}");
968 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{heading},\n.{cell} {{\n display: table-cell;\n}}");
969
970 // A content column shrinks to what is in it. `width: 1%` is how a CSS table
971 // is told that: auto layout hands the slack to the columns that asked for
972 // room, and a column asking for almost none gets what it needs and no more.
973 // The `nowrap` is what stops it being given less by wrapping.
974 let _ = writeln!(
975 css,
976 ".{} {{\n white-space: nowrap;\n width: 1%;\n}}",
977 class("cell-content", opts)
978 );
979
980 // A fixed column has no length to be fixed to. The description carries none
981 // and `Sizing` is not reachable from here, so it behaves as content: the
982 // honest answer to a width nobody supplied, and the same one `Sizing::track`
983 // gives it.
984 let _ = writeln!(
985 css,
986 ".{} {{\n white-space: nowrap;\n}}",
987 class("cell-fixed", opts)
988 );
989
990 // Optional columns go at the narrowest class, secondary ones go with them,
991 // which is the cutoff walk `kept_at` describes said as two media queries.
992 // Essential columns have no rule at all, because never dropping is what not
993 // being mentioned already means.
994 for (size, drops) in [
995 (
996 SizeClass::Compact,
997 &["cell-drops-first", "cell-drops-next"][..],
998 ),
999 (SizeClass::Medium, &["cell-drops-first"][..]),
1000 ] {
1001 let selectors: Vec<String> = drops
1002 .iter()
1003 .map(|drop| format!(".{}", class(drop, opts)))
1004 .collect();
1005 css.push_str(&gated(
1006 Some(&size.media_condition()),
1007 &format!("{} {{\n display: none;\n}}\n", selectors.join(",\n")),
1008 ));
1009 }
1010
1011 css
1012}
1013
1014/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
1015///
1016/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
1017/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
1018/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
1019#[must_use]
1020pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1021 let mut css = String::new();
1022 css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
1023 css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
1024 css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
1025 css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
1026 css.push_str(&progress_rules(opts));
1027 css.push_str(&figure_rules(opts));
1028 css.push_str(&state_rules(opts));
1029 css.push_str(&table_rules(opts));
1030 css
1031}
1032
1033/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, in
1034/// [`CSS_LAYER`], under a generated-file banner.
1035///
1036/// The banner sits outside the layer, because a comment participates in no
1037/// cascade and a reader opening the file should see what it is before seeing
1038/// an at-rule.
1039#[must_use]
1040pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1041 format!(
1042 "/* Generated by makeover-webview from makeover-layout. Do not edit.\n \
1043 Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n \
1044 them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout.\n\n \
1045 Everything below is in the `{CSS_LAYER}` cascade layer. Declare the\n \
1046 order once in your own stylesheet, or this layer's position is decided\n \
1047 by whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:\n\n \
1048 @layer {CSS_LAYER}, base, components, responsive; */\n{}",
1049 in_css_layer(&format!(
1050 ":root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
1051 bevel_properties(opts),
1052 depth_rules(opts),
1053 component_rules(opts)
1054 ))
1055 )
1056}
1057
1058#[cfg(test)]
1059mod tests {
1060 use super::*;
1061 use makeover_layout::Edge;
1062
1063 #[test]
1064 fn the_emitted_bevel_matches_what_the_apps_already_hand_write() {
1065 // Balanced Breakfast's styles.css, verbatim. Adoption has to be a
1066 // deletion, not a redesign, or nobody will take it.
1067 let opts = Emit::default();
1068 assert_eq!(
1069 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts),
1070 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-light), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-dark)"
1071 );
1072 assert_eq!(
1073 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Inset, &opts),
1074 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-dark), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-light)"
1075 );
1076 }
1077
1078 #[test]
1079 fn no_colour_ever_reaches_the_output() {
1080 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1081 assert!(!css.contains('#'), "a hex literal escaped into the CSS");
1082 assert!(
1083 !css.contains("rgb"),
1084 "a colour function escaped into the CSS"
1085 );
1086 // Every colour is named, never resolved.
1087 assert!(css.contains("var(--surface-raised)"));
1088 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-light)"));
1089 }
1090
1091 #[test]
1092 fn a_well_falls_back_through_css_rather_than_through_rust() {
1093 assert_eq!(
1094 fill_var(Fill::Well),
1095 "var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"
1096 );
1097 // Nothing else needs one.
1098 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Raised), "var(--surface-raised)");
1099 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Page), "var(--surface-page)");
1100 }
1101
1102 #[test]
1103 fn raised_and_well_do_not_collapse_onto_each_other() {
1104 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
1105 assert!(css.contains(".raised {"));
1106 assert!(css.contains(".well {"));
1107 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"));
1108 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"));
1109 }
1110
1111 /// The cast shadow is composed here from the tone `makeover` derives, so
1112 /// neither crate has to hold the other's numbers.
1113 ///
1114 /// It is a `:root` property and deliberately not a depth class. There is no
1115 /// `Depth::Overlay` in the description layer, and adding one would be a
1116 /// claim about what a screen means rather than about how it is painted;
1117 /// until something asks for it, a consumer names the property on the rule
1118 /// for the menu or the toast it already has.
1119 #[test]
1120 fn the_cast_shadow_is_a_root_property_not_a_depth() {
1121 let css = bevel_properties(&Emit::default());
1122 assert!(css.contains("--elevation-overlay:"));
1123 assert!(css.contains("var(--elevation)"));
1124 assert!(
1125 !depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("elevation"),
1126 "elevation is not a depth class"
1127 );
1128 }
1129
1130 #[test]
1131 fn the_cascade_carries_the_pressed_state() {
1132 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
1133 // The one thing this renderer gets free that the other two resolve by
1134 // hand, eighteen call sites deep in audiofiles' case. Asserted on a
1135 // named surface: pressing belongs to the control, not to the depth.
1136 assert!(css.contains(".card:active {"));
1137 assert!(css.contains(".button:active {"));
1138 }
1139
1140 #[test]
1141 fn the_depth_class_is_a_surface_and_not_a_control() {
1142 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
1143 // The static surface the vocabulary was missing. Sixteen goingson
1144 // elements wore .card and cancelled its hover and press to get this,
1145 // because a raised object that is not pressable had no other spelling.
1146 for state in [":hover", ":active", ":focus-visible", ":disabled"] {
1147 assert!(
1148 !css.contains(&format!(".raised{state}")),
1149 "the depth class claimed {state}: {css}"
1150 );
1151 }
1152 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"), "still raised: {css}");
1153 }
1154
1155 #[test]
1156 fn pressing_moves_the_fill_and_not_only_the_edge() {
1157 // The decision-1 guard, and the regression that mattered: emitting the
1158 // bevel flip alone is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
1159 // var(--surface-sunken)` on .btn, .card and .tag/.badge alike, so none
1160 // of the three could be deleted.
1161 let pressed = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1162 assert!(pressed.contains(".button:active {"));
1163 assert!(
1164 pressed.contains("background: var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"),
1165 "pressed dropped its fill: {pressed}"
1166 );
1167 assert!(pressed.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
1168 }
1169
1170 #[test]
1171 fn pressed_takes_its_fill_from_the_description_not_from_the_app() {
1172 // goingson presses to --surface-sunken. The description says a pressed
1173 // raised region reads as a well, and makeover says outright that
1174 // surface-sunken cannot serve as one, so the app is the thing that
1175 // moves.
1176 //
1177 // Scoped to the pressed rules rather than to the whole sheet: since
1178 // makeover-layout 0.3.0 an unchosen tab is legitimately
1179 // --surface-sunken, so the token appearing somewhere in the output no
1180 // longer means the app's choice leaked in.
1181 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1182 let mut checked = 0;
1183 for rule in css.split("}\n") {
1184 if !rule.contains(":active") {
1185 continue;
1186 }
1187 checked += 1;
1188 assert!(
1189 !rule.contains("surface-sunken"),
1190 "a pressed rule took the app's fill: {rule}"
1191 );
1192 }
1193 assert!(checked > 0, "no pressed rules found to check");
1194 assert_eq!(
1195 Depth::Raised.pressed().fill(),
1196 Some(Fill::Well),
1197 "the description changed under us"
1198 );
1199 }
1200
1201 #[test]
1202 fn the_whole_stylesheet_is_emitted_in_the_family_layer() {
1203 // The point of 0.11.0. Unlayered normal declarations outrank every
1204 // named layer, so an app declaring `@layer base, components` loses
1205 // every rule it owns to this file until this file is layered too.
1206 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1207 assert!(css.contains(&format!("@layer {CSS_LAYER} {{")));
1208
1209 // Exactly one layer block, and nothing outside it but the banner.
1210 assert_eq!(css.matches("@layer").count(), 2, "banner names it once");
1211 let opened = css.find("@layer makeover {").expect("layer opens");
1212 for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
1213 let before_layer = css.lines().take(i).map(str::len).sum::<usize>() < opened;
1214 if before_layer || line.is_empty() {
1215 continue;
1216 }
1217 assert!(
1218 line.starts_with(" ") || line == "}" || line.starts_with(" "),
1219 "line outside the layer: {line:?}"
1220 );
1221 }
1222 }
1223
1224 #[test]
1225 fn the_generated_sheet_carries_no_trailing_whitespace() {
1226 // A checked-in generated file that a formatter wants to rewrite is a
1227 // diff every time somebody saves it.
1228 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1229 for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
1230 assert_eq!(line, line.trim_end(), "trailing whitespace on line {i}");
1231 }
1232 }
1233
1234 #[test]
1235 fn the_banner_tells_an_app_how_to_order_the_layer() {
1236 // Without a declared order the layer's position depends on which
1237 // generated file the browser sees first, which is not a contract.
1238 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1239 assert!(css.contains("@layer makeover, base, components, responsive;"));
1240 // And the banner is outside the layer, not a rule inside it.
1241 assert!(css.starts_with("/* Generated by makeover-webview"));
1242 }
1243
1244 #[test]
1245 fn a_primitive_owns_every_state_it_implies() {
1246 // The whole point of 0.10.0. Anything emitting a hover rule owes the
1247 // other three, or the consuming app supplies them by out-specifying a
1248 // rule it does not own: 19 such rules in goingson, 21 in the MNW
1249 // server, and three focus rings that do not match.
1250 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1251 for selector in ["button", "card", "chip", "tab", "segment", "toggle"] {
1252 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:hover {{")), "{selector}");
1253 assert!(
1254 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:active {{")),
1255 "{selector}"
1256 );
1257 assert!(
1258 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:focus-visible {{")),
1259 "{selector} has no focus ring"
1260 );
1261 assert!(
1262 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:disabled,")),
1263 "{selector} has no disabled state"
1264 );
1265 }
1266 }
1267
1268 #[test]
1269 fn a_field_takes_focus_and_refuses_input_without_taking_a_hover() {
1270 // A text field does not light up under the pointer, so it gets the two
1271 // states it has and not the two it does not.
1272 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1273 assert!(css.contains(".field:focus-visible {"));
1274 assert!(css.contains(".field:disabled,"));
1275 assert!(!css.contains(".field:hover {"));
1276 assert!(!css.contains(".field:active {"));
1277 }
1278
1279 #[test]
1280 fn disabled_is_emitted_after_hover_so_source_order_settles_it() {
1281 // Every one of these selectors is specificity (0,2,0), so nothing but
1282 // order decides which wins. A disabled button taking the hover fill is
1283 // the exact bug goingson's `.button:disabled:hover` was written to fix,
1284 // and the reason it had to reach (0,3,0) to do it.
1285 let css = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1286 let hover = css.find(":hover").expect("hover");
1287 let active = css.find(":active").expect("active");
1288 let focus = css.find(":focus-visible").expect("focus");
1289 let disabled = css.find(":disabled").expect("disabled");
1290 assert!(hover < active && active < focus && focus < disabled);
1291
1292 // And it restores the surface, or the hover fill survives underneath.
1293 let tail = &css[disabled..];
1294 assert!(tail.contains("background: var(--surface-raised)"));
1295 }
1296
1297 #[test]
1298 fn a_disabled_state_reaches_things_that_cannot_be_disabled() {
1299 // `:disabled` matches form elements only, and a chip is a div. Keying
1300 // on the ARIA attribute too is the pattern the invalid field already
1301 // set: one fact, read by the styling and the accessibility tree alike.
1302 let css = disabled_rule("chip", Depth::Raised);
1303 assert!(css.contains(".chip:disabled,"));
1304 assert!(css.contains(".chip[aria-disabled=\"true\"]"));
1305 assert!(css.contains("cursor: not-allowed"));
1306 }
1307
1308 #[test]
1309 fn the_focus_ring_does_not_disturb_the_bevel_it_lands_on() {
1310 // `outline` has its own property, so unlike the invalid ring there is
1311 // no bevel to restate beside it and nothing to keep in agreement.
1312 let opts = Emit::default();
1313 let css = focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts);
1314 assert!(css.contains("outline: 2px solid var(--focus-ring)"));
1315 assert!(!css.contains("box-shadow"), "the ring restated the bevel");
1316 }
1317
1318 #[test]
1319 fn a_well_takes_the_ring_inside_and_a_raised_surface_outside() {
1320 // One ring, placed by depth. The offset comes off `Depth::bevel` and
1321 // not off a per-component choice, which is what gave three apps three
1322 // different rings.
1323 let opts = Emit::default();
1324 assert!(focus_rule("field", Depth::Well, &opts).contains("outline-offset: calc(-1 * 2px)"));
1325 assert!(focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
1326 // Nothing to sit inside of, so it sits outside.
1327 assert!(focus_rule("badge", Depth::Sunken, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
1328
1329 // And the ring is not the bevel. Reusing border_width emitted a 1px
1330 // ring that every consumer had already overridden.
1331 assert_ne!(opts.focus_width, opts.border_width);
1332 }
1333
1334 #[test]
1335 fn hover_is_gated_on_capability_and_the_keyboard_path_is_not() {
1336 // goingson's section 60 exists only to take back the hover state this
1337 // crate handed it. Gating at the source is what deletes that section
1338 // in all three apps rather than having each fight for it.
1339 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1340 let condition = format!("@media {}", Density::Pointer.media_condition());
1341 assert!(css.contains(&condition));
1342
1343 // What is gated is every hover state the surfaces carry. The row's
1344 // actions used to be the other half of this test and are not gated any
1345 // more, because they are not hidden any more: a rule that reveals
1346 // nothing needs no capability answer.
1347 let gated: Vec<&str> = css.lines().filter(|line| line.contains(":hover")).collect();
1348 assert!(!gated.is_empty(), "{css}");
1349 for line in gated {
1350 let indent = line.len() - line.trim_start().len();
1351 assert!(indent > 4, "an ungated hover rule: {line}");
1352 }
1353 assert!(!css.contains(".row:hover"), "{css}");
1354 }
1355
1356 #[test]
1357 fn the_capability_answer_is_asked_for_and_not_assumed() {
1358 // Both halves come from the crates that own them. If `makeover-touch`
1359 // ever says a fingertip has hover, this stops gating on its own.
1360 assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact));
1361 assert!(Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Pointer, SizeClass::Compact));
1362 assert_eq!(hover_condition(), Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition()));
1363
1364 // And the size class passed to that call is not a claim about width.
1365 assert!(Affordance::Hover.reads_density());
1366 for size in [SizeClass::Compact, SizeClass::Medium, SizeClass::Expanded] {
1367 assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, size));
1368 }
1369 }
1370
1371 #[test]
1372 fn hover_resolves_against_the_token_makeover_already_derives() {
1373 let css = interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1374 assert!(css.contains(".card:hover {"));
1375 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--hover-surface)"));
1376 // Not the app's choice, which was --surface-overlay.
1377 assert!(!css.contains("surface-overlay"));
1378 }
1379
1380 #[test]
1381 fn a_badge_gets_no_edge_and_no_fill() {
1382 // Decision 2, and the one visible redesign in phase A. Token::Badge is
1383 // Flat: an edge on a label says it can be pressed.
1384 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
1385 let badge = css
1386 .lines()
1387 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".badge {"))
1388 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
1389 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
1390 .join("\n");
1391 assert!(!badge.contains("box-shadow"), "badge kept an edge: {badge}");
1392 assert!(!badge.contains("background"), "badge kept a fill: {badge}");
1393 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(false), Depth::Flat);
1394 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(true), Depth::Flat);
1395 }
1396
1397 #[test]
1398 fn a_badge_carries_a_tone_and_neutral_is_the_bare_class() {
1399 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
1400 // Neutral is the absence of a status, not a status named "none".
1401 assert!(css.contains(".badge {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
1402 assert!(!css.contains("data-tone=\"content-muted\""));
1403 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
1404 assert!(
1405 css.contains(&format!(".badge[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
1406 "missing tone {tone}"
1407 );
1408 assert!(css.contains(&format!("color: var(--{tone})")));
1409 }
1410 }
1411
1412 #[test]
1413 fn a_chip_is_raised_and_latches_into_a_well() {
1414 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
1415 assert!(css.contains(".chip {"));
1416 assert!(css.contains(".chip.latched {"));
1417 assert!(css.contains(".chip:active {"));
1418 // The whole difference from a badge: it answers a click.
1419 assert!(Token::Chip { removable: false }.interactive());
1420 assert!(!Token::Badge.interactive());
1421 }
1422
1423 #[test]
1424 fn only_a_tab_comes_forward_when_chosen() {
1425 // The folder semantic. Collapsing the three selectors would lose it.
1426 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
1427 assert!(css.contains(".tab.chosen {"));
1428 assert!(css.contains(".segment.chosen {"));
1429 assert!(css.contains(".toggle.chosen {"));
1430 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.chosen(), Depth::Raised);
1431 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
1432 assert_eq!(Selector::Toggle.chosen(), Depth::Well);
1433
1434 let tab = css
1435 .lines()
1436 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".tab.chosen {"))
1437 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
1438 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
1439 .join("\n");
1440 assert!(
1441 tab.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"),
1442 "tab was held in: {tab}"
1443 );
1444 }
1445
1446 #[test]
1447 fn an_unchosen_tab_recedes_without_looking_picked() {
1448 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
1449 // Recessed by colour and given no edge. An edge would make every option
1450 // look picked; flat would leave the chosen one nothing to come forward
1451 // from, which is the gap makeover-layout 0.3.0 closed.
1452 assert!(
1453 css.contains(".tab {\n background: var(--surface-sunken);\n}"),
1454 "unchosen tab is not recessed: {css}"
1455 );
1456 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.unchosen(), Depth::Sunken);
1457 assert!(css.contains(".tab:hover {"));
1458 }
1459
1460 #[test]
1461 fn a_segment_stands_up_so_the_chosen_one_can_be_held_in() {
1462 // The inverse of the tab, and why the three selectors are not one
1463 // member with a flag.
1464 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
1465 assert!(css.contains(".segment {\n background: var(--surface-raised);"));
1466 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.unchosen(), Depth::Raised);
1467 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
1468 }
1469
1470 #[test]
1471 fn a_rows_actions_are_shown_at_rest() {
1472 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
1473
1474 // The hover reveal is gone, and with it every escape it needed. What
1475 // it hid was hidden from pointer users alone, who are the ones
1476 // scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
1477 assert!(!css.contains("opacity"), "{css}");
1478 assert!(!css.contains("pointer-events"), "{css}");
1479 assert!(!css.contains(":hover"), "{css}");
1480 assert!(!css.contains(":focus-within"), "{css}");
1481
1482 // Nor is it hidden any other way. `display: none` would reflow the row
1483 // and `visibility: hidden` would take the actions out of the focus
1484 // order; the point is that neither is reached for.
1485 assert!(!css.contains("display: none"), "{css}");
1486 assert!(!css.contains("visibility:"), "{css}");
1487
1488 // The description still says the part is revealed on hover. That is a
1489 // renderer's decision to make, in the words of the method's own doc,
1490 // and this renderer now decides otherwise for every device.
1491 assert!(RowPart::Actions.revealed_on_hover());
1492 }
1493
1494 #[test]
1495 fn the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits() {
1496 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
1497 assert!(css.contains(".row-primary {\n color: var(--content);"));
1498 assert!(css.contains(".row-secondary {\n color: var(--content-secondary);"));
1499 assert!(css.contains(".row-meta {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
1500 // Actions carry controls, not text. Pinning the colour it would inherit
1501 // anyway is louder than saying nothing.
1502 assert!(!css.contains(".row-actions {\n color:"));
1503 }
1504
1505 #[test]
1506 fn the_token_strip_takes_no_colour_of_its_own() {
1507 // makeover-layout 0.9.0. A token carries its own tone, so a colour on
1508 // the strip would be a rule fighting the things sitting in it -- the
1509 // same reasoning as actions, reached for a different reason.
1510 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
1511 assert!(!css.contains(".row-tokens {\n color:"));
1512 }
1513
1514 #[test]
1515 fn an_unknown_row_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
1516 // What `#[non_exhaustive]` bought and what it cost. `part_class` can no
1517 // longer be exhaustive, so a member added upstream lands as a bare
1518 // class with no rule instead of stopping the build. Asserting the
1519 // fallback exists is what keeps it from being written as `unreachable!`
1520 // by someone who reads the match as closed.
1521 assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Tokens), "row-tokens");
1522 assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Meta), "row-meta");
1523 }
1524
1525 #[test]
1526 fn the_progress_trough_is_a_well() {
1527 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
1528 assert!(css.contains(".progress {"));
1529 assert!(css.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
1530 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {"));
1531 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--action)"));
1532 // A bare `.fill` would catch things that have nothing to do with
1533 // progress once the sheet lands unprefixed.
1534 assert!(!css.contains("> .fill "));
1535 }
1536
1537 #[test]
1538 fn a_progress_bar_can_carry_a_tone_and_defaults_to_action() {
1539 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
1540 // Untoned is --action, not Tone::Neutral's content-muted: a bar with no
1541 // status is still reporting progress, and muted would read as disabled.
1542 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {\n background: var(--action);"));
1543 assert!(!css.contains("progress-fill {\n color: var(--content-muted)"));
1544 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
1545 assert!(
1546 css.contains(&format!(".progress > .progress-fill[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
1547 "missing progress tone {tone}"
1548 );
1549 }
1550 // goingson's two live cases, which is why the tones are emitted at all.
1551 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] {\n background: var(--success);"));
1552 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n background: var(--danger);"));
1553 }
1554
1555 #[test]
1556 fn no_scrollbar_track_is_emitted() {
1557 // Decision 3's negative half. It was on the phase A list and came off;
1558 // this is what stops it drifting back in.
1559 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1560 assert!(!css.contains("scrollbar"));
1561 assert!(!css.contains("::-webkit"));
1562 }
1563
1564 #[test]
1565 fn an_invalid_field_is_ringed_without_being_lit() {
1566 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
1567 assert!(css.contains(".field {"));
1568 // The ARIA attribute, not a class: one fact, read by both the visual
1569 // and the accessible state, so they cannot drift.
1570 assert!(css.contains(".field[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {"));
1571 assert!(!css.contains(".field.invalid"));
1572 // A flat ring: this edge says "wrong", and a two-tone bevel would have
1573 // it say "raised" at the same time.
1574 assert!(css.contains("0 0 0 1px var(--danger)"));
1575 }
1576
1577 #[test]
1578 fn an_invalid_field_keeps_the_well_underneath_it() {
1579 // box-shadow is not additive. A lone ring replaces the bevel and drops
1580 // the well out from under the field, which is what this emitted before
1581 // 0.5.0 and is the whole reason the rule composes.
1582 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
1583 let invalid = css
1584 .lines()
1585 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".field[aria-invalid"))
1586 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
1587 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
1588 .join("\n");
1589 assert!(
1590 invalid.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"),
1591 "the well was dropped: {invalid}"
1592 );
1593 assert!(invalid.contains("var(--danger)"));
1594 }
1595
1596 #[test]
1597 fn button_and_card_come_out_identical_by_construction() {
1598 // The duplication phase A deletes. They are the same composition, so
1599 // the only honest way to emit both is from one call.
1600 let opts = Emit::default();
1601 let css = surface_rules(&opts);
1602 assert_eq!(
1603 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised),
1604 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised)
1605 );
1606 assert!(css.contains(".button {"));
1607 assert!(css.contains(".card {"));
1608 assert_eq!(
1609 interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default()).replace("button", "card"),
1610 interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default())
1611 );
1612 }
1613
1614 #[test]
1615 fn a_prefix_reaches_the_component_classes_too() {
1616 let opts = Emit {
1617 class_prefix: "mo-",
1618 ..Emit::default()
1619 };
1620 let css = stylesheet(&opts);
1621 for name in [
1622 "mo-button",
1623 "mo-card",
1624 "mo-field",
1625 "mo-badge",
1626 "mo-chip",
1627 "mo-tab",
1628 "mo-row-primary",
1629 "mo-progress",
1630 "mo-progress-fill",
1631 ] {
1632 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}")), "unprefixed: {name}");
1633 }
1634 // The bare names must be gone entirely, or a prefixed build still
1635 // collides with the app's own stylesheet.
1636 assert!(!css.contains(".button {"));
1637 assert!(!css.contains(".card {"));
1638 assert!(!css.contains(".badge {"));
1639 }
1640
1641 #[test]
1642 fn a_destructive_button_has_somewhere_for_its_tone_to_land() {
1643 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
1644
1645 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1646 assert!(
1647 css.contains(&format!(".button[data-tone=\"{}\"]", tone.token())),
1648 "{css}"
1649 );
1650 }
1651 // Colour, not a fill. A red surface is an app's decision about emphasis.
1652 assert!(!css.contains(".button[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n background"));
1653 }
1654
1655 #[test]
1656 fn a_described_list_is_not_a_bulleted_list() {
1657 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
1658 assert!(css.contains(".list {\n list-style: none;"), "{css}");
1659 }
1660
1661 #[test]
1662 fn a_table_lays_itself_out_without_being_told_its_columns() {
1663 // The whole point of the CSS table. A described table's columns are
1664 // known at render time, so anything the stylesheet has to be told about
1665 // them would have to travel with the markup.
1666 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
1667
1668 assert!(css.contains(".table {\n display: table;"), "{css}");
1669 assert!(css.contains("display: table-row;"), "{css}");
1670 assert!(css.contains("display: table-cell;"), "{css}");
1671 assert!(!css.contains("grid-template-columns"), "{css}");
1672 }
1673
1674 #[test]
1675 fn a_column_drops_by_its_priority_and_never_by_its_position() {
1676 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
1677
1678 // Optional goes at the narrowest class and secondary goes with it,
1679 // which is `kept_at`'s cutoff walk said as two queries.
1680 let compact = css
1681 .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Compact.media_condition()))
1682 .expect("a compact query");
1683 let medium = css
1684 .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Medium.media_condition()))
1685 .expect("a medium query");
1686 assert!(css[compact..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
1687 assert!(!css[medium..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
1688
1689 // Essential columns are never mentioned, because not being mentioned is
1690 // already what never dropping means.
1691 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-keeps"), "{css}");
1692
1693 // And nothing counts. `nth-child` is the bug the priority vocabulary
1694 // exists to end.
1695 assert!(!css.contains("nth-child"), "{css}");
1696 }
1697
1698 #[test]
1699 fn the_whole_sheet_still_names_every_colour() {
1700 // The crate's founding property, asserted over the component layer and
1701 // not only the primitives.
1702 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1703 assert!(!css.contains('#'));
1704 assert!(!css.contains("rgb"));
1705 for line in css.lines() {
1706 // Declarations only: a selector or an at-rule can carry a colon of
1707 // its own (`:root`, `:hover`, `@media (hover: hover)`) and declares
1708 // nothing. Keyed on the trailing semicolon rather than on leading
1709 // indentation, which only ever worked as a proxy for nesting depth
1710 // and stopped when the sheet gained a cascade layer around it.
1711 let trimmed = line.trim();
1712 if !trimmed.ends_with(';') {
1713 continue;
1714 }
1715 let Some((_, value)) = trimmed.split_once(": ") else {
1716 continue;
1717 };
1718 if value.contains("var(--") {
1719 continue;
1720 }
1721 // Everything left has to be a keyword, a number or a
1722 // caller-supplied length, never a colour.
1723 //
1724 // The length arm is what the comment above always claimed and the
1725 // list never covered: `border_width` arrives from `Emit` and lands
1726 // bare in the focus ring's offset, where the bevel had only ever
1727 // used it inside an `inset` shadow.
1728 let opts = Emit::default();
1729 assert!(
1730 value.contains("inset")
1731 || value.contains(opts.border_width)
1732 || value.contains(opts.focus_width)
1733 // 0.12.0's two: a sortable header is a control and says so
1734 // with the pointer, and the caret is this renderer's own
1735 // expression of `aria-sort`. Neither is a colour, which is
1736 // what this test is actually about, and neither is a size,
1737 // which is the other thing this crate must not name.
1738 || value.starts_with("\"\\2")
1739 || matches!(
1740 value.trim_end_matches(';'),
1741 "0" | "1"
1742 | "none"
1743 | "auto"
1744 | "not-allowed"
1745 | "pointer"
1746 // The table frame. `display` is structure and not a
1747 // size; `nowrap` is what makes a content column
1748 // content. The two widths are the awkward pair and
1749 // they are still not sizes: `100%` is "all of
1750 // whatever you were given" and `1%` is the CSS
1751 // table idiom for "shrink to fit", which is a
1752 // behaviour spelled as a number because CSS has no
1753 // keyword for it. Neither names a magnitude, which
1754 // is the thing this crate leaves to
1755 // makeover-geometry.
1756 | "table"
1757 | "table-row"
1758 | "table-cell"
1759 | "nowrap"
1760 | "100%"
1761 | "1%"
1762 ),
1763 "unrecognised literal value: {line}"
1764 );
1765 }
1766 }
1767
1768 #[test]
1769 fn flat_emits_nothing_at_all() {
1770 assert_eq!(depth_class(Depth::Flat, &Emit::default()), None);
1771 assert!(!depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("flat"));
1772 }
1773
1774 #[test]
1775 fn a_prefix_namespaces_every_class() {
1776 let opts = Emit {
1777 class_prefix: "mo-",
1778 ..Emit::default()
1779 };
1780 let css = depth_rules(&opts);
1781 assert!(css.contains(".mo-raised {"));
1782 assert!(css.contains(".mo-well {"));
1783 assert!(!css.contains(".raised {"));
1784 }
1785
1786 #[test]
1787 fn the_border_width_is_the_callers() {
1788 let opts = Emit {
1789 border_width: "2px",
1790 ..Emit::default()
1791 };
1792 assert!(bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts).contains("inset 2px 2px 0"));
1793 }
1794
1795 #[test]
1796 fn edges_agree_with_the_description() {
1797 // Not a tautology: it is the guard that a CSS-shaped convenience never
1798 // quietly reverses which side is lit.
1799 let (tl, br) = Bevel::Raised.edges();
1800 assert_eq!(tl.token(), Edge::Light.token());
1801 assert_eq!(br.token(), Edge::Dark.token());
1802 }
1803}