The question this answers, and the only question it answers: if the author
changed nothing about their campaign and the engine’s own tables were
finished, would this line go away?
The campaign. Every refusal, and every advisory whose verdict is a fact
about the documents in front of the author — the default, because a
diagnostic is addressed to an author unless it says otherwise.
The ENGINE, regardless of the campaign: an engine table that is still
seeded, a standard that has not been calibrated. Nothing the author can
write moves it, and it is identical on every campaign the engine
compiles, so it prints after the lines that ARE theirs — see Group.
This is not a licence to make a campaign’s problem quiet. The test is
whether the line would read the same on a different campaign; where it
names something the author wrote, it is a Subject::Campaign verdict
however advisory its tier.