wasm-opt-sys 0.116.0

#ifndef wasm_analysis_stack_lattice_h
#define wasm_analysis_stack_lattice_h

#include <deque>
#include <optional>

#include "lattice.h"

namespace wasm::analysis {

// Note that in comments, bottom is left and top is right.

// This lattice models the behavior of a stack of values. The lattice
// is templated on StackElementLattice, which is a lattice which can
// model some abstract property of a value on the stack. The StackLattice
// itself can push or pop abstract values and access the top of stack.
//
// The goal here is not to operate directly on the stacks. Rather, the
// StackLattice organizes the StackElementLattice elements in an efficient
// and natural way which reflects the behavior of the wasm value stack.
// Transfer functions will operate on stack elements individually. The
// stack itself is an intermediate structure.
//
// Comparisons are done elementwise, starting from the top of the stack.
// For instance, to compare the stacks [c,b,a], [b',a'], we first compare
// a with a', then b with b'. Then we make note of the fact that the first
// stack is higher, with an extra c element at the bottom.
//
// Similarly, Least Upper Bounds are done elementwise starting from the top.
// For instance LUB([b, a], [b', a']) = [LUB(b, b'), LUB(a, a')], while
// LUB([c, b, a], [b', a']) = [c, LUB(b, b'), LUB(a, a')].
//
// These are done from the top of the stack because this addresses the problem
// of scopes. For instance, if we have the following program
//
// i32.const 0
// i32.const 0
// if (result i32)
//   i32.const 1
// else
//   i32.const 2
// end
// i32.add
//
// Before the if-else control flow, we have [] -> [i32], and after the if-else
// control flow we have [i32, i32] -> [i32]. However, inside each of the if
// and else conditions, we have [] -> [i32], because they cannot see the
// stack elements pushed by the enclosing scope. In effect in the if and else,
// we have a stack [i32 | i32], where we can't "see" left of the |.
//
// Conceptually, we can also imagine each stack [b, a] as being implicitly an
// infinite stack of the form (bottom) [... BOTTOM, BOTTOM, b, a] (top). This
// makes stacks in different scopes comparable, with only their contents
// different. Stacks in more "inner" scopes simply have more bottom elements in
// the bottom portion.
//
// A common application for this lattice is modeling the Wasm value stack.
// For instance, one could use this to analyze the maximum bit size of
// values on the Wasm value stack. When new actual values are pushed
// or popped off the Wasm value stack by instructions, the same is done
// to abstract lattice elements in the StackLattice.
//
// When two control flows are joined together, one with stack [b, a] and
// another with stack [b, a'], we can take the least upper bound to
// produce a stack [b, LUB(a, a')], where LUB(a, a') takes the maximum
// of the two maximum bit values.

template<typename StackElementLattice> class StackLattice {
  static_assert(is_lattice<StackElementLattice>);
  StackElementLattice& stackElementLattice;

public:
  StackLattice(StackElementLattice& stackElementLattice)
    : stackElementLattice(stackElementLattice) {}

  class Element {
    // The top lattice can be imagined as an infinitely high stack of top
    // elements, which is unreachable in most cases. In practice, we make the
    // stack an optional, and we represent top with the absence of a stack.
    std::optional<std::deque<typename StackElementLattice::Element>>
      stackValue = std::deque<typename StackElementLattice::Element>();

  public:
    bool isTop() const { return !stackValue.has_value(); }
    bool isBottom() const {
      return stackValue.has_value() && stackValue->empty();
    }
    void setToTop() { stackValue.reset(); }

    typename StackElementLattice::Element& stackTop() {
      return stackValue->back();
    }

    void push(typename StackElementLattice::Element&& element) {
      // We can imagine each stack [b, a] as being implicitly an infinite stack
      // of the form (bottom) [... BOTTOM, BOTTOM, b, a] (top). In that case,
      // adding a bottom element to an empty stack changes nothing, so we don't
      // actually add a bottom.
      if (stackValue.has_value() &&
          (!stackValue->empty() || !element.isBottom())) {
        stackValue->push_back(std::move(element));
      }
    }

    void push(const typename StackElementLattice::Element& element) {
      if (stackValue.has_value() &&
          (!stackValue->empty() || !element.isBottom())) {
        stackValue->push_back(std::move(element));
      }
    }

    typename StackElementLattice::Element pop() {
      typename StackElementLattice::Element value = stackValue->back();
      stackValue->pop_back();
      return value;
    }

    // When taking the LUB, we take the LUBs of the elements of each stack
    // starting from the top of the stack. So, LUB([b, a], [b', a']) is
    // [LUB(b, b'), LUB(a, a')]. If one stack is higher than the other,
    // the bottom of the higher stack will be kept, while the LUB of the
    // corresponding tops of each stack will be taken. For instance,
    // LUB([d, c, b, a], [b', a']) is [d, c, LUB(b, b'), LUB(a, a')].
    //
    // We start at the top because it makes taking the LUB of stacks with
    // different scope easier, as mentioned at the top of the file. It also
    // fits with the conception of the stack starting at the top and having
    // an infinite bottom, which allows stacks of different height and scope
    // to be easily joined.
    bool makeLeastUpperBound(const Element& other) {
      // Top element cases, since top elements don't actually have the stack
      // value.
      if (isTop()) {
        return false;
      } else if (other.isTop()) {
        stackValue.reset();
        return true;
      }

      bool modified = false;

      // Merge the shorter height stack with the top of the longer height
      // stack. We do this by taking the LUB of each pair of matching elements
      // from both stacks.
      auto otherIterator = other.stackValue->crbegin();
      auto thisIterator = stackValue->rbegin();
      for (; thisIterator != stackValue->rend() &&
             otherIterator != other.stackValue->crend();
           ++thisIterator, ++otherIterator) {
        modified |= thisIterator->makeLeastUpperBound(*otherIterator);
      }

      // If the other stack is higher, append the bottom of it to our current
      // stack.
      for (; otherIterator != other.stackValue->crend(); ++otherIterator) {
        stackValue->push_front(*otherIterator);
        modified = true;
      }

      return modified;
    }

    void print(std::ostream& os) {
      if (isTop()) {
        os << "TOP STACK" << std::endl;
        return;
      }

      for (auto iter = stackValue->rbegin(); iter != stackValue->rend();
           ++iter) {
        iter->print(os);
        os << std::endl;
      }
    }

    friend StackLattice;
  };

  // Like in computing the LUB, we compare the tops of the two stacks, as it
  // handles the case of stacks of different scopes. Comparisons are done by
  // element starting from the top.
  //
  // If the left stack is higher, and left top >= right top, then we say
  // that left stack > right stack. If the left stack is lower and the left top
  // >= right top or if the left stack is higher and the right top > left top or
  // they are unrelated, then there is no relation. Same applies for the reverse
  // relationship.
  LatticeComparison compare(const Element& left, const Element& right) {
    // Handle cases where there are top elements.
    if (left.isTop()) {
      if (right.isTop()) {
        return LatticeComparison::EQUAL;
      } else {
        return LatticeComparison::GREATER;
      }
    } else if (right.isTop()) {
      return LatticeComparison::LESS;
    }

    bool hasLess = false;
    bool hasGreater = false;

    // Check the tops of both stacks which match (i.e. are within the heights
    // of both stacks). If there is a pair which is not related, the stacks
    // cannot be related.
    for (auto leftIterator = left.stackValue->crbegin(),
              rightIterator = right.stackValue->crbegin();
         leftIterator != left.stackValue->crend() &&
         rightIterator != right.stackValue->crend();
         ++leftIterator, ++rightIterator) {
      LatticeComparison currComparison =
        stackElementLattice.compare(*leftIterator, *rightIterator);
      switch (currComparison) {
        case LatticeComparison::NO_RELATION:
          return LatticeComparison::NO_RELATION;
        case LatticeComparison::LESS:
          hasLess = true;
          break;
        case LatticeComparison::GREATER:
          hasGreater = true;
          break;
        default:
          break;
      }
    }

    // Check cases for when the stacks have unequal. As a rule, if a stack
    // is higher, it is greater than the other stack, but if and only if
    // when comparing their matching top portions the top portion of the
    // higher stack is also >= the top portion of the shorter stack.
    if (left.stackValue->size() > right.stackValue->size()) {
      hasGreater = true;
    } else if (right.stackValue->size() > left.stackValue->size()) {
      hasLess = true;
    }

    if (hasLess && !hasGreater) {
      return LatticeComparison::LESS;
    } else if (hasGreater && !hasLess) {
      return LatticeComparison::GREATER;
    } else if (hasLess && hasGreater) {
      // Contradiction, and therefore must be unrelated.
      return LatticeComparison::NO_RELATION;
    } else {
      return LatticeComparison::EQUAL;
    }
  }

  Element getBottom() { return Element{}; }
};

} // namespace wasm::analysis

#endif // wasm_analysis_stack_lattice_h