uncomment 3.8.0

A CLI tool to remove comments from code using tree-sitter for accurate parsing
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
//! The three rules, evaluated against one comment at a time.
//!
//! Every input is an [`InspectedComment`] from [`crate::processor::Processor::inspect`], never raw
//! file text. That is the whole reason this tool carries tree-sitter: `let s = "TODO: fix";` is a
//! string literal, the parser knows it, and a linter that grepped for `TODO` would flag it.
//!
//! A finding carries absolute byte offsets and, when the rule is fixable, the [`Edit`]s that fix it.
//! Converting an offset to a line and column needs the file's text and belongs to the caller, which
//! keeps everything here a pure function of the comment.

use crate::edit::Edit;
use crate::lint::config::{LintConfig, Rule, Severity};
use crate::processor::InspectedComment;

/// The longest excerpt reported for one finding, in characters.
const EXCERPT_LIMIT: usize = 120;

/// One tag occurrence inside a comment, with everything the rules need to judge it.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct TagSite {
    /// Absolute byte offset of the tag token in the file.
    pub start: usize,
    /// Absolute byte offset just past the tag token.
    pub end: usize,
    pub tag: String,
    pub key: Option<String>,
    /// A `(...)` group follows the tag, whatever it holds.
    pub has_group: bool,
    /// A `:` follows the tag, past any `(...)` group.
    pub has_colon: bool,
    pub excerpt: String,
}

/// A rule violation at one tag site.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct Finding {
    pub rule: Rule,
    pub severity: Severity,
    /// Absolute byte offset of the tag token, for line and column reporting.
    pub offset: usize,
    pub tag: String,
    pub key: Option<String>,
    pub message: String,
    pub excerpt: String,
    /// Empty when the rule cannot be fixed automatically.
    pub edits: Vec<Edit>,
}

impl Finding {
    pub fn is_fixable(&self) -> bool {
        !self.edits.is_empty()
    }
}

/// Every tag occurrence in `comment`, at most one per line of the comment's text.
///
/// One per line because a tag comment is a single statement about a single piece of work:
/// `// TODO(K-1): drop this once FIXME above is gone` mentions `FIXME` in prose and must not be read
/// as a second, unkeyed tag. A block comment with a tag on each of three lines is three sites.
pub fn tag_sites(comment: &InspectedComment, config: &LintConfig) -> Vec<TagSite> {
    let text = &comment.text;
    let mut sites = Vec::new();
    let mut claimed_line: Option<usize> = None;

    for matched in config.tag_pattern.find_iter(text) {
        let line_index = text[..matched.start()].matches('\n').count();
        if claimed_line == Some(line_index) {
            continue;
        }
        claimed_line = Some(line_index);

        let from_tag = &text[matched.start()..];
        let after_tag = &text[matched.end()..];

        sites.push(TagSite {
            start: comment.start_byte + matched.start(),
            end: comment.start_byte + matched.end(),
            tag: matched.as_str().to_string(),
            key: config.extract_key(from_tag).map(str::to_string),
            has_group: group_follows(after_tag),
            has_colon: colon_follows(after_tag),
            excerpt: excerpt_of(text, matched.start()),
        });
    }

    sites
}

/// Findings for one comment.
///
/// `current_issue` is the issue key derived from the branch, `None` when there is none to compare
/// against — outside a repository, on a detached `HEAD`, or on a branch carrying no key. In that case
/// `todo-self-reference` is silently not evaluated; the caller reports the reason as a note, because
/// a linter that failed a run over an unrelated fact about the checkout would be unusable in CI.
///
/// `todo_key` is `--todo-key`: the one way a missing key can be fixed, since a key cannot be
/// invented.
pub fn check(
    comment: &InspectedComment,
    config: &LintConfig,
    current_issue: Option<&str>,
    todo_key: Option<&str>,
) -> Vec<Finding> {
    let mut findings = Vec::new();

    for site in tag_sites(comment, config) {
        let canonical = site.tag == config.canonical_tag;

        if !canonical && config.is_on(Rule::TagNotCanonical) {
            findings.push(Finding {
                rule: Rule::TagNotCanonical,
                severity: config.severity(Rule::TagNotCanonical),
                offset: site.start,
                tag: site.tag.clone(),
                key: site.key.clone(),
                message: format!("`{}` should be written as `{}`", site.tag, config.canonical_tag),
                excerpt: site.excerpt.clone(),
                edits: vec![Edit::new(site.start, site.end, config.canonical_tag.clone())],
            });
        }

        match &site.key {
            None => {
                if config.is_on(Rule::TodoMissingKey) {
                    findings.push(Finding {
                        rule: Rule::TodoMissingKey,
                        severity: config.severity(Rule::TodoMissingKey),
                        offset: site.start,
                        tag: site.tag.clone(),
                        key: None,
                        message: format!("`{}` carries no issue key", site.tag),
                        excerpt: site.excerpt.clone(),
                        edits: missing_key_edits(&site, todo_key),
                    });
                }
            }
            Some(key) => {
                if config.is_on(Rule::TodoSelfReference) && current_issue.is_some_and(|current| current == key) {
                    findings.push(Finding {
                        rule: Rule::TodoSelfReference,
                        severity: config.severity(Rule::TodoSelfReference),
                        offset: site.start,
                        tag: site.tag.clone(),
                        key: Some(key.clone()),
                        message: format!(
                            "`{key}` is the issue this change is being made under, which closes on merge — \
                             name a follow-up issue instead"
                        ),
                        excerpt: site.excerpt.clone(),
                        edits: Vec::new(),
                    });
                }
            }
        }
    }

    findings
}

/// The edit that supplies an explicit key, or nothing.
///
/// Refuses to act when a `(...)` group already follows the tag: the key pattern rejected whatever is
/// in there, and prepending a second group would produce `TODO(K-1)(whatever):`. The colon is added
/// only when there is not one already, which is what makes `--fix --todo-key` idempotent: the result
/// matches the key pattern, so the second run finds nothing to do.
fn missing_key_edits(site: &TagSite, todo_key: Option<&str>) -> Vec<Edit> {
    let Some(key) = todo_key else {
        return Vec::new();
    };
    if site.has_group {
        return Vec::new();
    }

    let suffix = if site.has_colon { "" } else { ":" };
    vec![Edit::insert(site.end, format!("({key}){suffix}"))]
}

/// Whether a `(…)` group opens immediately after the tag, ignoring horizontal whitespace.
fn group_follows(after_tag: &str) -> bool {
    skip_blanks(after_tag).starts_with('(')
}

/// Whether a `:` follows the tag, past at most one `(…)` group.
///
/// Hand-rolled rather than a regex because both shapes are fixed: there is no configuration here to
/// get wrong, and a hardcoded pattern would need a panicking `unwrap` to compile.
fn colon_follows(after_tag: &str) -> bool {
    let rest = skip_blanks(after_tag);
    let rest = match rest.strip_prefix('(') {
        Some(inside) => match inside.find([')', '\n']) {
            Some(index) if inside.as_bytes().get(index) == Some(&b')') => &inside[index + 1..],
            _ => return false,
        },
        None => rest,
    };
    skip_blanks(rest).starts_with(':')
}

fn skip_blanks(text: &str) -> &str {
    text.trim_start_matches([' ', '\t'])
}

/// The line of `text` holding `offset`, trimmed and length-capped.
fn excerpt_of(text: &str, offset: usize) -> String {
    let line_start = text[..offset].rfind('\n').map_or(0, |index| index + 1);
    let line_end = text[offset..].find('\n').map_or(text.len(), |index| offset + index);
    let line = text[line_start..line_end].trim();

    if line.chars().count() <= EXCERPT_LIMIT {
        return line.to_string();
    }

    let truncated: String = line.chars().take(EXCERPT_LIMIT).collect();
    format!("{truncated}…")
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use crate::lint::config::LintTable;
    use crate::processor::{CommentKind, Verdict};

    use super::*;

    fn config() -> LintConfig {
        let table: LintTable = toml::from_str("enabled = true\n").expect("valid table");
        LintConfig::from_table(&table, None).expect("valid config")
    }

    fn config_from(toml: &str) -> LintConfig {
        let table: LintTable = toml::from_str(toml).expect("valid table");
        LintConfig::from_table(&table, None).expect("valid config")
    }

    /// A comment as `inspect` would report it, placed at `start` in some file.
    fn comment(text: &str, start: usize) -> InspectedComment {
        InspectedComment {
            start_byte: start,
            end_byte: start + text.len(),
            start_row: 0,
            end_row: text.matches('\n').count(),
            node_type: "line_comment".to_string(),
            kind: CommentKind::Line,
            verdict: Verdict::Preserve,
            reason: None,
            text: text.to_string(),
            is_documentation: false,
        }
    }

    fn rules_fired(text: &str, current_issue: Option<&str>) -> Vec<Rule> {
        check(&comment(text, 0), &config(), current_issue, None)
            .into_iter()
            .map(|finding| finding.rule)
            .collect()
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_keyed_canonical_tag_is_clean() {
        assert!(rules_fired("// TODO(AMVP-1): later", None).is_empty());
        assert!(rules_fired("# TODO(PPSC-42): later", None).is_empty());
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_tag_without_a_key_is_missing_one() {
        assert_eq!(rules_fired("// TODO: later", None), vec![Rule::TodoMissingKey]);
        assert_eq!(rules_fired("# TODO later", None), vec![Rule::TodoMissingKey]);
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_non_canonical_tag_fires_both_rules_when_it_also_lacks_a_key() {
        assert_eq!(
            rules_fired("// FIXME: later", None),
            vec![Rule::TagNotCanonical, Rule::TodoMissingKey]
        );
        assert_eq!(
            rules_fired("// FIXME(AMVP-1): later", None),
            vec![Rule::TagNotCanonical]
        );
        assert_eq!(rules_fired("// HACK(AMVP-1): later", None), vec![Rule::TagNotCanonical]);
        assert_eq!(rules_fired("// XXX(AMVP-1): later", None), vec![Rule::TagNotCanonical]);
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_key_equal_to_the_current_issue_is_a_self_reference() {
        assert_eq!(
            rules_fired("// TODO(AMVP-160815): later", Some("AMVP-160815")),
            vec![Rule::TodoSelfReference]
        );
        assert!(rules_fired("// TODO(AMVP-999999): later", Some("AMVP-160815")).is_empty());
        assert!(
            rules_fired("// TODO(AMVP-160815): later", None).is_empty(),
            "with no current issue there is nothing to compare against"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_self_referencing_non_canonical_tag_reports_both() {
        assert_eq!(
            rules_fired("// FIXME(AMVP-160815): later", Some("AMVP-160815")),
            vec![Rule::TagNotCanonical, Rule::TodoSelfReference]
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_rule_set_to_off_is_not_evaluated() {
        let config = config_from("enabled = true\n[rules]\ntodo-missing-key = 'off'\n");
        let findings = check(&comment("// FIXME: later", 0), &config, None, None);
        assert_eq!(
            findings.iter().map(|f| f.rule).collect::<Vec<_>>(),
            vec![Rule::TagNotCanonical]
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_warn_severity_is_carried_onto_the_finding() {
        let config = config_from("enabled = true\n[rules]\ntodo-missing-key = 'warn'\n");
        let findings = check(&comment("// TODO: later", 0), &config, None, None);
        assert_eq!(findings[0].severity, Severity::Warn);
    }

    #[test]
    fn one_tag_per_line_so_prose_mentioning_another_tag_is_not_a_second_site() {
        let sites = tag_sites(
            &comment("// TODO(AMVP-1): drop once the FIXME above is gone", 0),
            &config(),
        );
        assert_eq!(sites.len(), 1);
        assert_eq!(sites[0].tag, "TODO");
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_block_comment_reports_one_site_per_tagged_line() {
        let text = "/*\n * TODO: first\n * plain prose\n * FIXME(AMVP-2): second\n */";
        let sites = tag_sites(&comment(text, 0), &config());
        assert_eq!(
            sites.iter().map(|site| site.tag.as_str()).collect::<Vec<_>>(),
            vec!["TODO", "FIXME"]
        );
        assert_eq!(sites[0].key, None);
        assert_eq!(sites[1].key.as_deref(), Some("AMVP-2"));
    }

    #[test]
    fn an_untagged_comment_has_no_sites_at_all() {
        assert!(tag_sites(&comment("// just a note", 0), &config()).is_empty());
        assert!(tag_sites(&comment("// TODOS are tracked in Jira", 0), &config()).is_empty());
    }

    #[test]
    fn offsets_are_absolute_so_the_fix_lands_inside_the_comments_own_span() {
        let content = "fn main() {}\n    // FIXME: later\n";
        let comment_start = content.find("//").expect("comment present");
        let inspected = comment("// FIXME: later", comment_start);

        let findings = check(&inspected, &config(), None, None);
        let fix = findings
            .iter()
            .find(|finding| finding.rule == Rule::TagNotCanonical)
            .expect("tag-not-canonical is fixable");
        let edit = &fix.edits[0];

        assert_eq!(&content[edit.start..edit.end], "FIXME");
        assert!(edit.start >= inspected.start_byte && edit.end <= inspected.end_byte);
        assert_eq!(
            crate::edit::apply_edits(content, fix.edits.clone()).expect("applies"),
            "fn main() {}\n    // TODO: later\n"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_fix_preserves_the_existing_key_and_punctuation_exactly() {
        let content = "# FIXME(AMVP-1): x\n";
        let findings = check(&comment("# FIXME(AMVP-1): x", 0), &config(), None, None);
        let edits: Vec<Edit> = findings.into_iter().flat_map(|finding| finding.edits).collect();
        assert_eq!(
            crate::edit::apply_edits(content, edits).expect("applies"),
            "# TODO(AMVP-1): x\n"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_missing_key_is_unfixable_without_an_explicit_key() {
        let findings = check(&comment("// TODO: later", 0), &config(), None, None);
        assert!(!findings[0].is_fixable());
    }

    #[test]
    fn an_explicit_key_fixes_a_missing_one_and_supplies_the_colon_when_absent() {
        let cases = [
            ("// TODO: later", "// TODO(AMVP-9): later"),
            ("// TODO later", "// TODO(AMVP-9): later"),
            ("//TODO", "//TODO(AMVP-9):"),
            ("// TODO  :  later", "// TODO(AMVP-9)  :  later"),
        ];

        for (input, expected) in cases {
            let findings = check(&comment(input, 0), &config(), None, Some("AMVP-9"));
            let edits: Vec<Edit> = findings.into_iter().flat_map(|finding| finding.edits).collect();
            assert_eq!(
                crate::edit::apply_edits(input, edits).expect("applies"),
                expected,
                "fixing {input:?}"
            );
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_non_canonical_tag_missing_a_key_is_fixed_by_both_edits_at_once() {
        let findings = check(&comment("// FIXME: later", 0), &config(), None, Some("AMVP-9"));
        let edits: Vec<Edit> = findings.into_iter().flat_map(|finding| finding.edits).collect();
        assert_eq!(
            crate::edit::apply_edits("// FIXME: later", edits).expect("applies"),
            "// TODO(AMVP-9): later"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_key_the_pattern_rejects_is_not_fixed_by_prepending_a_second_group() {
        let findings = check(&comment("// TODO(nope): later", 0), &config(), None, Some("AMVP-9"));
        assert_eq!(findings[0].rule, Rule::TodoMissingKey);
        assert!(
            !findings[0].is_fixable(),
            "rewriting would produce `TODO(AMVP-9)(nope):`"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn fixing_a_missing_key_is_idempotent() {
        let once = {
            let findings = check(&comment("// TODO later", 0), &config(), None, Some("AMVP-9"));
            let edits: Vec<Edit> = findings.into_iter().flat_map(|f| f.edits).collect();
            crate::edit::apply_edits("// TODO later", edits).expect("applies")
        };
        assert_eq!(once, "// TODO(AMVP-9): later");

        let twice = check(&comment(&once, 0), &config(), None, Some("AMVP-9"));
        assert!(twice.is_empty(), "{twice:?}");
    }

    #[test]
    fn an_excerpt_is_the_tags_own_line_trimmed_and_capped() {
        let text = "/*\n *   TODO: the second line\n */";
        let sites = tag_sites(&comment(text, 0), &config());
        assert_eq!(sites[0].excerpt, "*   TODO: the second line");

        let long = format!("// TODO: {}", "x".repeat(400));
        let sites = tag_sites(&comment(&long, 0), &config());
        assert_eq!(sites[0].excerpt.chars().count(), EXCERPT_LIMIT + 1);
        assert!(sites[0].excerpt.ends_with('…'));
    }

    #[test]
    fn a_multi_byte_comment_yields_char_boundary_offsets() {
        let text = "// café — TODO: later";
        let sites = tag_sites(&comment(text, 0), &config());
        assert_eq!(sites.len(), 1);
        assert!(text.is_char_boundary(sites[0].start));
        assert!(text.is_char_boundary(sites[0].end));
        assert_eq!(&text[sites[0].start..sites[0].end], "TODO");
    }
}