tix-tracker 0.12.0

//! The **one** move decision every surface asks (mission
//! `configurable-wip-limits-01M3C6WX`, WP03 T012-T016).
//!
//! # One decision, or the feature is a suggestion
//!
//! C-006 says a surface-local WIP bypass is a defect. The way to make that true is
//! to have exactly one function that answers "may this move happen?", with no
//! second copy of the rule in a command, a TUI handler or an MCP tool: those call
//! [`evaluate`] and act on the [`WipDecision`] it returns. This module therefore
//! does not write, read a file, read a clock or know what a keystroke is.
//!
//! # The order, and why it is this order
//!
//! 1. **The transition first** — [`workflow::validate_transition`], untouched. #183
//!    owns what a column *means* and which moves are legal (C-002); WIP is an
//!    additional question asked of a legal move, never a substitute for asking it.
//!    A refused transition is [`WipOutcome::Rejected`] with #183's own diagnostic.
//! 2. **A same-column move is a no-op** — #183 already says so (`changed: false`).
//!    It returns [`WipOutcome::Allow`] immediately: a move that moves nothing must
//!    not warn, must not block, and must not append an override event.
//! 3. **The limit and its unit** — from the board's configuration, resolved once
//!    through the aggregate snapshot, which is also where the before/after figures
//!    come from. The moving issue's own estimate is converted into the limit's unit;
//!    an estimate that cannot be counted **rejects** the move rather than counting
//!    as zero (C-003).
//! 4. **The configured policy** — within the limit is `allow`; over it is `warn` or
//!    `block` according to the configuration, never according to a default.
//!
//! # What an outcome means
//!
//! | outcome | may the caller write? | History |
//! |---|---|---|
//! | `allow` | yes | none — a move within the limit is not a decision |
//! | `warn` | yes | none — a warning is not an override (C-005 names overrides) |
//! | `block` | **no** | none — nothing was decided |
//! | `override` | yes | exactly one event, carrying actor/time/reason/from/to/limit/before/after |
//! | `rejected` | **no** | none |
//!
//! `block` is the refusal a caller can *try to lift*: it carries
//! [`WipDecision::requires_override`] and the exact [`BoundLimit`](super::r#override::BoundLimit)
//! an override must be authorized against. A caller that supplies that override
//! gets `override` on the same move; a caller that supplies an incomplete or stale
//! one gets `rejected` — inert, and named field by field.

use crate::config::Config;
use crate::model::{HistoryEventKind, Issue};
use crate::workflow::{self, TransitionOutcome};

use super::aggregate::{ColumnUsage, LimitState, WipSnapshot};
use super::config::{ColumnLimit, Estimate, LimitPolicy, WipDiagnostic, WipDiagnosticKind};
use super::r#override::OverrideRequest;

/// What a surface may do with a move.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
pub enum WipOutcome {
    /// The move is within every limit (or there is no limit): write it.
    Allow,
    /// The move is over a limit configured to warn: write it and report.
    Warn,
    /// The move is over a limit configured to block, and no override was supplied.
    /// Nothing may be written; an authorized override would carry it.
    Block,
    /// The move is over a blocking limit and a complete, current override carried
    /// it. The one History event is in [`WipDecision::history`].
    Override,
    /// The transition was refused, the estimate could not be counted, or the
    /// override was incomplete or stale. Nothing may be written.
    Rejected,
}

impl WipOutcome {
    /// The stable spelling every surface prints and every test asserts.
    pub const fn as_str(self) -> &'static str {
        match self {
            Self::Allow => "allow",
            Self::Warn => "warn",
            Self::Block => "block",
            Self::Override => "override",
            Self::Rejected => "rejected",
        }
    }

    /// Whether the caller may write the move.
    pub const fn is_committable(self) -> bool {
        matches!(self, Self::Allow | Self::Warn | Self::Override)
    }

    /// Whether this refusal is one an authorized override could lift.
    pub const fn requires_override(self) -> bool {
        matches!(self, Self::Block)
    }
}

/// What the policy needs to decide: the configuration and the issues in hand.
///
/// Both are already loaded by the caller, which is what keeps this service
/// filesystem-free — and what makes a decision reproducible in a test without a
/// repository.
pub struct MoveContext<'a> {
    /// The project configuration (the board, and #183's policy it carries).
    pub config: &'a Config,
    /// The issues as read, so the aggregate is the one every surface sees.
    pub issues: &'a [Issue],
}

impl<'a> MoveContext<'a> {
    /// A context over already-loaded state.
    pub const fn new(config: &'a Config, issues: &'a [Issue]) -> Self {
        Self { config, issues }
    }
}

/// One move, as a surface asks for it.
pub struct MoveRequest<'a> {
    /// The issue being moved.
    pub issue: &'a Issue,
    /// The column it is being moved to.
    pub to: &'a str,
    /// A reason for a **transition** override (#183's own gate, e.g. leaving a
    /// terminal column). Separate from the WIP override below: they are two
    /// different gates, and a caller may need either, both or neither.
    pub transition_override: Option<&'a str>,
    /// An authorized override of a blocking **WIP** limit, when the caller has one.
    pub over: Option<&'a OverrideRequest>,
}

impl<'a> MoveRequest<'a> {
    /// A move with no override of either kind.
    pub const fn new(issue: &'a Issue, to: &'a str) -> Self {
        Self {
            issue,
            to,
            transition_override: None,
            over: None,
        }
    }

    /// Attach a reason for #183's own transition gate.
    pub const fn because(mut self, reason: &'a str) -> Self {
        self.transition_override = Some(reason);
        self
    }

    /// Attach a WIP override.
    pub const fn overriding(mut self, over: &'a OverrideRequest) -> Self {
        self.over = Some(over);
        self
    }
}

/// The History entry an applied override writes.
///
/// An **intent**, not a write: the caller appends it through the existing grammar
/// ([`crate::model::History::append_now`] or its `at`-stamped sibling), so there is
/// no second audit log and the service stays inert (T016, C-005).
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct HistoryIntent {
    /// The existing #169 event kind an override is recorded as.
    pub kind: HistoryEventKind,
    /// Who overrode, as the request stated it.
    pub actor: String,
    /// When, as the request stated it.
    pub timestamp: String,
    /// The one sentence: reason, columns, limit and the before/after figures.
    pub detail: String,
}

/// The decision.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct WipDecision {
    /// What the caller may do.
    pub outcome: WipOutcome,
    /// The column the issue is in.
    pub from: String,
    /// The column the move targets.
    pub to: String,
    /// The limit in force for the target column, when it has one.
    pub limit: Option<ColumnLimit>,
    /// The target column's state before the move.
    pub state_before: LimitState,
    /// The target column's state **if** the move happens.
    pub state_after: LimitState,
    /// The target column's usage, when it has a limit.
    pub usage: Option<ColumnUsage>,
    /// Everything that made the decision what it is.
    pub diagnostics: Vec<WipDiagnostic>,
    /// The one History entry an applied override writes; `None` otherwise.
    pub history: Option<HistoryIntent>,
}

impl WipDecision {
    /// Whether an authorized override could carry this refusal.
    pub const fn requires_override(&self) -> bool {
        self.outcome.requires_override()
    }

    /// The outcome's stable spelling.
    pub const fn as_str(&self) -> &'static str {
        self.outcome.as_str()
    }

    /// The [`BoundLimit`](super::r#override::BoundLimit) an override must be
    /// authorized against, when this is a `block`.
    pub fn bound_limit(&self) -> Option<super::r#override::BoundLimit> {
        self.limit
            .as_ref()
            .map(|limit| super::r#override::BoundLimit::of(&self.to, limit))
    }

    /// Whether the caller may write the move.
    pub const fn is_committable(&self) -> bool {
        self.outcome.is_committable()
    }
}

/// Judge one move (T012).
#[allow(clippy::too_many_lines)]
pub fn evaluate(context: &MoveContext<'_>, request: &MoveRequest<'_>) -> WipDecision {
    let from = request.issue.status.display().to_string();
    let to = request.to.to_string();
    let allow = |state: LimitState, diagnostics| WipDecision {
        outcome: WipOutcome::Allow,
        from: from.clone(),
        to: to.clone(),
        limit: None,
        state_before: state,
        state_after: state,
        usage: None,
        diagnostics,
        history: None,
    };

    // 1. The transition, through #183's own service (C-002).
    let (_, resolution) = workflow::active_resolution(context.config);
    match workflow::validate_transition(
        request.issue,
        request.to,
        &resolution,
        context.config,
        request.transition_override,
    ) {
        TransitionOutcome::Rejected(diagnostic) => {
            return WipDecision {
                outcome: WipOutcome::Rejected,
                from,
                to,
                limit: None,
                state_before: LimitState::Within,
                state_after: LimitState::Within,
                usage: None,
                diagnostics: vec![WipDiagnostic::new(
                    WipDiagnosticKind::RejectedTransition,
                    diagnostic.message,
                )],
                history: None,
            };
        }
        // 2. A same-column move decides nothing and therefore warns and blocks
        //    nothing: #183 already calls it permitted and idempotent.
        TransitionOutcome::Accepted { changed: false, .. } => {
            return allow(LimitState::Within, Vec::new());
        }
        TransitionOutcome::Accepted { .. } => {}
    }

    // 3. The limit and its unit, from the one shared snapshot.
    let snapshot = WipSnapshot::build(context.config.default_config(), context.issues);
    let Some(usage) = snapshot.column(&to).cloned() else {
        // A column the board does not configure. #183 would have refused it above,
        // so this is unreachable in practice; treating it as "no limit" keeps the
        // policy from inventing a refusal #183 did not make.
        return allow(LimitState::Within, Vec::new());
    };
    let Some(limit) = usage.limit.clone() else {
        return allow(LimitState::Within, Vec::new());
    };

    // The moving issue's own contribution: one card, and the estimate it states
    // **counted in the limit's unit**. An estimate that cannot be counted rejects
    // the move (T014) — never zero, never a guess.
    let unit = usage.unit().unwrap_or_default().to_string();
    let mut diagnostics = Vec::new();
    let add_estimate = match request
        .issue
        .estimate
        .as_deref()
        .map(str::trim)
        .filter(|raw| !raw.is_empty())
    {
        None => 0,
        Some(raw) => match Estimate::parse_terms(raw).and_then(|terms| {
            context
                .config
                .default_config()
                .wip
                .convert_terms(&terms, &unit)
        }) {
            Ok(value) => value,
            Err(error) => {
                let first = error.first();
                diagnostics.push(
                    WipDiagnostic::new(
                        first.kind,
                        format!(
                            "issue #{} states `{raw}`, which this board cannot count in \
                             `{unit}`: {}",
                            request.issue.number, first.message
                        ),
                    )
                    .because(
                        "the move is refused rather than counted as zero: an uncountable \
                         estimate must not pass a limit silently (C-003)",
                    ),
                );
                return WipDecision {
                    outcome: WipOutcome::Rejected,
                    from,
                    to,
                    limit: Some(limit),
                    state_before: usage.state(),
                    state_after: LimitState::Unknown,
                    usage: Some(usage),
                    diagnostics,
                    history: None,
                };
            }
        },
    };

    let state_before = usage.state();
    let state_after = usage.prospective(1, add_estimate);

    // An aggregate nobody can trust is a refusal, not a pass: WP02 already made the
    // column's own state `Unknown` in this case, so the move inherits it.
    if state_after == LimitState::Unknown {
        diagnostics.push(
            WipDiagnostic::new(
                WipDiagnosticKind::AmbiguousConversion,
                format!(
                    "`{to}` has an estimate ceiling of {} that cannot be compared against its \
                     current contents",
                    limit.max_estimate.unwrap_or_default()
                ),
            )
            .because("fix the uncountable estimate first; the move is refused meanwhile"),
        );
        return WipDecision {
            outcome: WipOutcome::Rejected,
            from,
            to,
            limit: Some(limit),
            state_before,
            state_after,
            usage: Some(usage),
            diagnostics,
            history: None,
        };
    }

    // 4. Within the limit: allowed, and deliberately not an event (C-004/C-005).
    if state_after == LimitState::Within {
        return WipDecision {
            outcome: WipOutcome::Allow,
            from,
            to,
            limit: Some(limit),
            state_before,
            state_after,
            usage: Some(usage),
            diagnostics,
            history: None,
        };
    }

    // Over the limit: the configuration decides whether that warns or blocks.
    let policy = limit.policy.unwrap_or(LimitPolicy::Warn);
    let mut decision = WipDecision {
        outcome: match policy {
            LimitPolicy::Warn => WipOutcome::Warn,
            LimitPolicy::Block => WipOutcome::Block,
        },
        from: from.clone(),
        to: to.clone(),
        limit: Some(limit.clone()),
        state_before,
        state_after,
        usage: Some(usage.clone()),
        diagnostics: vec![WipDiagnostic::new(
            WipDiagnosticKind::OverLimit,
            format!(
                "`{to}` would hold {} against a limit of {} ({})",
                describe_after(&usage, add_estimate),
                describe_limit(&limit),
                policy.as_str()
            ),
        )],
        history: None,
    };

    if policy == LimitPolicy::Warn {
        return decision;
    }

    // A blocking limit: only a complete, current override carries it.
    let Some(over) = request.over else {
        decision.diagnostics.push(
            WipDiagnostic::new(
                WipDiagnosticKind::OverrideRequired,
                format!("`{to}` is configured to block; an authorized override is required"),
            )
            .because("nothing was changed — supply a confirmed override to proceed"),
        );
        return decision;
    };
    let findings = over.findings(&to, &limit);
    if !findings.is_empty() {
        decision.outcome = WipOutcome::Rejected;
        decision.diagnostics = findings;
        return decision;
    }

    decision.outcome = WipOutcome::Override;
    decision.history = Some(HistoryIntent {
        kind: HistoryEventKind::TransitionAccepted,
        actor: over.actor.clone(),
        timestamp: over.timestamp.clone(),
        detail: format!(
            "wip override: `{from}` -> `{to}` against {}; {} -> {}: {}",
            super::r#override::BoundLimit::of(&to, &limit).describe(),
            usage.cell(),
            describe_after(&usage, add_estimate),
            over.reason.trim()
        ),
    });
    decision
}

/// The target column's figures **after** the move, as text.
fn describe_after(usage: &ColumnUsage, add_estimate: u32) -> String {
    let items = usage.items.saturating_add(1);
    match usage.max_estimate() {
        Some(max) => format!(
            "{items} cards, {}/{}",
            usage
                .estimate
                .unwrap_or_default()
                .saturating_add(add_estimate),
            max
        ),
        None => format!("{items} cards"),
    }
}

/// The limit as text.
fn describe_limit(limit: &ColumnLimit) -> String {
    let mut parts = Vec::new();
    if let Some(max) = limit.max_items {
        parts.push(format!("max_items {max}"));
    }
    if let Some(max) = limit.max_estimate {
        match limit.unit.as_deref() {
            Some(unit) => parts.push(format!("max_estimate {max}{unit}")),
            None => parts.push(format!("max_estimate {max}")),
        }
    }
    parts.join(", ")
}