tix-tracker 0.12.0

//! External tracker sync: orchestration for `tix export` / `tix import`,
//! the [`Tool`] selector, the [`CommandRunner`] spawn seam, and the pure
//! mapping / conflict-resolution rules.
//!
//! WP05 wires the CLI to `glab` (GitLab) and `linear-cli` (Linear) under
//! `contracts/external-tools.md`. Tokens are resolved through
//! [`token::resolve`] with env precedence, injected only as an env pair (never
//! argv), and every error/report surface scrubs the secret as `<token>`.
//!
//! The orchestration lives here so it is testable at module granularity by
//! pointing PATH at fake tool scripts; [`export`] / [`import`] are pure in the
//! sense that they take the store, tool, config and an output sink, and the
//! only externally visible side effects are local issue files, `tix.toml`,
//! the tool subprocesses, and what is written to `out`.
//!
//! ## One definition of "complete", and what this module's job actually is
//!
//! **A second local completion definition in this module is a C-004 defect.** There
//! used to be one: `remote_status_is_done(status) == (status == "closed" ||
//! status == "Done")`, a helper that looked like it decided whether an issue was
//! complete and in fact decided whether a *remote* state word was one of the two
//! this module happens to send. It had **no production callers** — WP02 removed the
//! last one — and its only remaining referrer was its own unit test, which is the
//! shape dead code takes when a test keeps it alive. Removed in WP07.
//!
//! What this module legitimately owns is the **translation**: the remote trackers
//! have a closed set of states (`opened`/`closed` for GitLab, a workflow-state label
//! for Linear), so something here has to say which remote word means closed and which
//! local column to send it as. That is a protocol concern and it is this module's
//! job.
//!
//! What it does **not** own is the meaning of *complete*. That is
//! [`crate::workflow::is_completed`] and nothing else — so [`local_to_remote_status`]
//! asks the service whether a local column is complete, and
//! [`remote_to_local_status`] picks the column the service calls complete via
//! [`completion_column`].
//!
//! The distinction matters because the two can disagree. A board whose `category_map`
//! puts `completed` on `shipped` while `done_column` is `done` has a completion
//! column that is *not* the one `done_column` names: comparing names exports
//! `shipped` as open and closes `done` instead, so the tracker and the board
//! disagree about the same issue in both directions.

use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::collections::HashSet;
use std::io::Write;

use crate::config::{BoardConfiguration, Config};
use crate::error::{Result, TixError};
use crate::model::{Issue, Status};
use crate::storage::Store;

mod adapters;
mod export;
mod import;
pub use adapters::*;
pub use export::*;
pub use import::*;

pub mod beads;
pub mod glab;
pub mod linear;
pub mod token;

/// Spawn seam: production uses [`ProcessRunner`]; tests inject a
/// `FakeRunner` that records argv/env without spawning anything.
pub trait CommandRunner: Send {
    fn run(
        &self,
        program: &str,
        args: &[String],
        env: &[(String, String)],
    ) -> Result<CommandOutcome>;

    /// Downcasting hook so tests can inspect recorded calls on a fake.
    fn as_any(&self) -> &dyn std::any::Any;
}

/// Common surface both tracker adapters implement so the orchestration is
/// tool-agnostic.
///
/// `status` is the *remote* state/label already computed by the pure mapping
/// helpers (e.g. `closed`, `Done`, or the first work column). GitLab conveys
/// "done" via a separate close call ([`TrackerAdapter::mark_done`]); Linear
/// conveys it with `-s Done` ([`TrackerAdapter::done_via_status`]).
pub trait TrackerAdapter {
    fn tool(&self) -> Tool;

    /// Create a remote issue and return its remote id (GitLab `iid`, Linear
    /// `identifier`).
    fn create_issue(
        &mut self,
        title: &str,
        body: &str,
        labels: &[String],
        assignee: Option<&str>,
        priority: Option<&str>,
        status: &str,
    ) -> Result<String>;

    /// Update an existing remote issue in place.
    #[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
    fn update_issue(
        &mut self,
        remote_ref: &str,
        title: &str,
        body: &str,
        labels: &[String],
        assignee: Option<&str>,
        priority: Option<&str>,
        status: &str,
    ) -> Result<()>;

    /// Convey "done" (GitLab: `issue close <id>`). Only invoked when
    /// `done_via_status` is false.
    fn mark_done(&mut self, remote_ref: &str) -> Result<()>;

    /// List open remote issues (the import source). Closed/done issues are
    /// excluded.
    fn list_open(&mut self) -> Result<Vec<RemoteIssue>>;

    /// Linear sets done through the status flag; GitLab needs a separate
    /// close call.
    fn done_via_status(&self) -> bool;

    /// Send the relationships this tracker can express, after the issue itself
    /// exists (WP07 T030/T031).
    ///
    /// **Required, not defaulted.** A default no-op would let a tracker be added
    /// that silently never syncs relationships — the failure mode is a local
    /// relation that appears to sync and does not, which is the same silent-loss
    /// shape as a dropped edge. Two implementors is a small price for making the
    /// omission a compile error.
    ///
    /// The relationships arrive already filtered by
    /// [`map_relation_to_remote`], so an adapter never decides representability:
    /// it sends what the shared seam says it can send, and reports the rest. A
    /// `blocks` edge reaches here; a `related` edge never does.
    fn set_relations(&mut self, remote_ref: &str, relations: &[MappedRelation]) -> Result<()>;

    /// Send the project associations this tracker can express, after the issue
    /// itself exists (WP08 T036).
    ///
    /// **Required, not defaulted**, for the same reason [`Self::set_relations`] is:
    /// a default no-op would let a tracker be added that silently never syncs
    /// project membership, which is the silent-loss shape C-005 forbids. Both
    /// adapters implement `PROJECT_WIRE_VERIFIED`'s answer, which is "nothing", and
    /// the signature is why a future tracker cannot answer with a different shape.
    ///
    /// The associations arrive already filtered by [`map_project_to_remote`], so an
    /// adapter never decides representability — and while `PROJECT_WIRE_VERIFIED` is
    /// empty it never receives a sendable value either, so both implementations
    /// return without spawning anything. A run that cannot express membership must
    /// send **nothing**: an empty membership flag that the tool interpreted as
    /// "clear it" would delete remote state on a run that had nothing to say, which
    /// is the same trap `set_relations` avoids by returning early on an empty set.
    fn set_projects(&mut self, remote_ref: &str, projects: &[MappedProject]) -> Result<()>;

    /// Send the epic references this tracker can express, after the issue itself
    /// exists (WP08, mission `epics-work-items-01M3BYW4`).
    ///
    /// **Required, not defaulted**, for the reason [`Self::set_relations`] and
    /// [`Self::set_projects`] give: a default no-op would let a tracker be added
    /// that silently never syncs an epic reference, which is the silent-loss shape
    /// C-007 forbids. The signature is why a future tracker cannot answer with a
    /// different shape.
    ///
    /// The references arrive already filtered by [`map_epic_to_remote`], so an
    /// adapter never decides representability. Both adapters implement
    /// `EPIC_WIRE_VERIFIED`'s answer, which is "nothing": neither `glab` nor
    /// `linear-cli` carries an epic membership list, so both return without spawning
    /// anything, and an empty set must spawn nothing (an empty flag the tool read as
    /// "clear it" would delete remote state on a run with nothing to say — the same
    /// trap `set_relations` avoids by returning early).
    fn set_epics(&mut self, remote_ref: &str, epics: &[MappedEpic]) -> Result<()>;
}

/// The remote fields each tracker can express for a typed relation, and the one it
/// maps every blocking edge onto.
///
/// This is the whole of the representability decision, and it is deliberately a
/// table keyed on `(Tool, RelationKind)` rather than logic spread across the two
/// adapters. Two consequences worth stating:
///
/// - **It is derived from what the adapters can actually send**, not from a guess
///   about their APIs. `linear-cli relations add -r <kind> <FROM> <TO>` is the only
///   relation verb either CLI exposes, so `blocks` maps for Linear and nothing else
///   does; `glab` exposes no relation verb at all (see `RELATION_CLI_ABSENT`).
/// - **`blocks` maps; `related`, `duplicates`, and `blocked_by` do not.** Both
///   trackers' issue-update CLIs carry a title, body, labels, assignee, and state —
///   and no field for "this issue is related to that one". Guessing otherwise
///   would mean writing a title into a field, which is not a mapping.
///
/// `blocked_by` is the inverse of `blocks`, not a third thing, so it is reported
/// against the same remote field: naming `blocking` for it would be true but would
/// send the reader looking for a relation the tracker does not have.
///
/// ## Linear is wire-verified; GitLab is verified to have no command at all
///
/// The mapping knows what each tracker's *model* can express — GitLab and Linear
/// both have blocking relations in their APIs — and the adapters drive a **CLI**,
/// so what matters is whether the CLI exposes a verb.
///
/// **Linear's does.** `linear-cli` 0.3.28 (nesszer/linear-cli, the
/// `cargo:linear-cli` crate) has `relations add --relation
/// <blocks|blocked-by|related|duplicate> <FROM> <TO>`, checked against the
/// installed binary on 2026-10-09. Four shapes parse — they fail only with
/// `No workspace selected` (exit 1, no workspace configured here):
/// `relations add -r blocks ENG-1 ENG-2`, `issues create "T" -t ENG -d D -p 2 -s
/// Todo -o json`, `issues update ENG-1 -T T -d D -s Done -o json`, and
/// `issues list -t ENG -s Todo -o json`; and two clap errors confirm the shape —
/// `linear-cli issue create "T"` (exit 2, `unrecognized subcommand 'issue'`) and
/// `linear-cli issues create --title T` (exit 2, `unexpected argument
/// '--title'`). The API path itself is unverified (no workspace), so the
/// adapter is checked at the grammar level and end to end against the fake.
///
/// Sending an unverified command line is not a conservative default; it is a
/// production failure with a confusing message. So the seam maps, and an adapter
/// sends only what a verified verb carries; **GitLab remains on the separate,
/// permanent `RELATION_CLI_ABSENT` list** below — the two answers must not blur.
///
/// The follow-up this closes: verify the verb against the real CLI, add the tool
/// to this list, and implement its `set_relations` ([`Tool::Linear`] does).
const RELATION_WIRE_VERIFIED: &[Tool] = &[Tool::Linear];

/// Tools whose CLI is **verified to expose no relation command at all**.
///
/// This is a *different, permanent* answer from "not yet verified", and the two
/// must not share wording. A reader told "the verb is not verified" will reasonably
/// wait for (or go looking for) the missing command; a reader told the CLI has no
/// such command can stop.
///
/// `glab` 1.119.0, checked against the installed binary (tix #1354):
/// `glab issue update --help` lists no `--blocking` (or any relation) flag, and
/// `glab issue` has no relation/`link` subcommand. GitLab's *model* has issue links
/// and the REST API exposes them, but the CLI this adapter drives does not.
const RELATION_CLI_ABSENT: &[Tool] = &[Tool::GitLab];

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// WP08 — the parent reference across a sync round trip
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

/// The CLI verbs that would carry a parent reference, per adapter.
///
/// **Empty: no adapter has a verified parent verb.** Both trackers' *models* have
/// a hierarchy — GitLab has epics and child issues, Linear has parent issues — but
/// the adapters drive a CLI, and whether `glab issue create --parent` or
/// `linear-cli issues create --parent` exists is a claim about a program this
/// repository cannot run. (Linear's `relations add` is verified for *relations*
/// and is on `RELATION_WIRE_VERIFIED`; that is a different verb and says nothing
/// about a parent, and the fake in `tests/bin/` accepts no parent flag.)
///
/// So the seam maps, and nothing is sent until a verb is verified. What *does*
/// work today — and is what the round trip covers — is that the reference
/// survives: the local parent is retained, the mapping is reported, and an import
/// restores a parent that came from the remote. Flipping a tool on here is a
/// one-line change plus its adapter implementation, once the verb is confirmed by
/// hand.
const PARENT_WIRE_VERIFIED: &[Tool] = &[];

/// The remote field each adapter would carry a parent in, if its verb existed.
///
/// Present so the diagnostic can *name* the thing that is missing, rather than
/// saying only that something is. A reader told "GitLab cannot express this" will
/// not go looking for the flag.
const GITLAB_PARENT_FIELD: &str = "parent";
const LINEAR_PARENT_FIELD: &str = "parent";

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// WP08 (mission first-class-projects-01M3BYBW) — project associations across a
// sync round trip
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
//
// ## The two directions are not symmetric, and each says so
//
// **Outward: nothing leaves the machine, ever.** GitLab's and Linear's *models*
// both know what a project is; the CLIs these adapters drive do not. `glab`
// already passes the one project an issue lives in (`--project <path>`) on every
// call and exposes no membership field at all, and Linear's issue carries a
// single `project` — so neither can hold the *list* this mission's C-003
// requires. Multi-membership is the intake's named risk, and the contract's
// answer for it is C-005, not a guess: every association diagnoses, and the local
// association list is untouched. Sending one member of a list would be a silent
// drop with extra steps.
//
// **Inward: a payload that reports associations is honoured.** The read direction
// is deliberately *not* gated the way the relation mapper's is, and the reason is
// not convenience. `map_relation_from_remote` must refuse an unrecognised field
// because turning remote text into a local edge can invent a relationship no
// export ever made. A project id cannot: it is matched against the local
// **registry** before anything is written, and an id the registry does not know
// is refused with a diagnostic rather than written (C-005). So the worst an
// invented id can produce is a named diagnostic, never local data. Reading a
// field a payload reported is also not the same claim as sending one — the same
// distinction `GlabIssue::parent` already draws.
//
// This is what makes the round trip non-vacuous: the export says what cannot
// leave, the import applies what came back through the project **service**, and
// the association list is byte-stable either way (NFR-002).

/// A project reference a remote reported on one issue.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct RemoteProject {
    /// The remote's project identity. It is the **only** thing an import matches
    /// on (C-002): an id is allocated once and never changes, so a remote that
    /// renames a project still names the same one.
    pub id: String,
    /// The remote's display name for the project, when it sent one.
    ///
    /// Carried for the diagnostics — a reader recognises "the remote calls it
    /// *Platform hardening*" — and **never** matched on. The local display name
    /// stays the registry's (C-002), so a remote rename cannot change it, and it
    /// is the only remote text in a diagnostic, which is why that diagnostic is
    /// scrubbed.
    pub name: Option<String>,
}

/// The remote field each adapter would carry an issue's project associations in.
///
/// The two differ because the trackers' models differ, and the diagnostic names
/// the field the reader should stop looking for:
///
/// - **GitLab** — `projects`. An issue JSON carries the one project that owns it;
///   the field a *membership list* would need is `projects`, which no `glab`
///   command exposes.
/// - **Linear** — `project`. Its issue carries exactly one project, so the field
///   that exists is named and the list it cannot hold is what diagnoses.
const GITLAB_PROJECT_FIELD: &str = "projects";
const LINEAR_PROJECT_FIELD: &str = "project";

/// Tools verified to drive project **membership** from their CLI.
///
/// **Empty, and not because the verb is merely unverified.** The relation and
/// parent tables are empty pending a verb confirmation; this one is empty because
/// neither CLI has a verb to confirm: `glab issue update --help` (1.119.0) lists
/// `--project` only as *which project owns the issue*, and Linear's issue carries
/// one `project` with no list form. So an issue with three projects cannot be
/// expressed as three of anything, and C-003's multi-membership — the intake's
/// named risk — is what makes this terminal rather than pending.
///
/// The table still exists rather than a bare `unsupported` constant so the seam
/// has the same shape as the other three, and so a future tracker that *does*
/// model membership in its CLI is a one-line addition plus its `set_projects`.
const PROJECT_WIRE_VERIFIED: &[Tool] = &[];

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// WP08 (mission epics-work-items-01M3BYW4) — epic references across a sync
// round trip
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
//
// ## What the adapters can actually express
//
// **Outward: nothing leaves the machine, and that is the derived answer, not a
// placeholder.** Research R7 states GitLab's adapter has no epic concept and the
// `grep` confirms it: neither `glab` nor `linear-cli` carries an epic membership
// list. `glab`'s issue JSON names at most one epic (`epic_iid`, which this adapter
// already reads as the issue's single parent) and exposes no flag to send one;
// Linear has no epic level at all. Because the mission allows **several** epics per
// issue (C-003), an adapter that sent one member of a list would be a silent drop
// with extra steps — which C-007 forbids outright. So every reference diagnoses and
// the local list is untouched.
//
// **Inward: a payload that reports epic ids is honoured.** Like the project seam,
// the read direction is deliberately *not* gated: the id is matched against the
// local **registry** before anything is written, so the worst an invented id can
// produce is a named diagnostic, never local data (C-007).
//
// This is what makes the round trip non-vacuous: the export says what cannot leave,
// the import applies what came back through the epic **service**
// ([`Store::reference_epic`], the same path `tix edit --add-epic` takes), and the
// reference list is byte-stable either way (NFR-002).

/// An epic reference a remote reported on one issue.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct RemoteEpic {
    /// The remote's epic identity. It is the **only** thing an import matches on
    /// (C-003): an epic id is allocated once and never changes, so a remote that
    /// renames an epic still names the same one.
    pub id: String,
    /// The remote's display name for the epic, when it sent one.
    ///
    /// Carried for the diagnostics — a reader recognises "the remote calls it
    /// *Sync hardening*" — and **never** matched on. The local display name stays
    /// the registry's (C-003), so a remote rename cannot change it; it is the only
    /// remote text in a diagnostic, which is why that diagnostic is scrubbed.
    pub name: Option<String>,
}

/// The remote field an adapter would carry an issue's epic references in.
///
/// **One constant, not a per-tool table.** Unlike a project association — where
/// the two models genuinely name different fields (`projects` for GitLab's owning
/// project vs Linear's single `project`) — both trackers would name an epic
/// membership list `epics`, so a per-tool indirection would carry no information.
/// The per-tool difference lives in [`epic_absence_reason`], which is where it
/// actually is: `glab` names at most one epic per issue (`epic_iid`), while Linear
/// has no epic level at all.
const EPIC_FIELD: &str = "epics";

/// Tools verified to drive an epic **membership** from their CLI.
///
/// **Empty, and derived from the adapters rather than assumed.** `glab`'s issue
/// carries at most one epic (`epic_iid`) and exposes no flag to set it or to hold a
/// list; Linear has no epic level. So an issue in three epics cannot be expressed as
/// three of anything, and C-003's multi-membership is what makes this terminal
/// rather than pending — the same reasoning `PROJECT_WIRE_VERIFIED` records.
///
/// The table still exists rather than a bare `unsupported` constant so the seam has
/// the same shape as the other three, and so a future tracker that *does* model an
/// epic list in its CLI is a one-line addition plus its `set_epics`.
const EPIC_WIRE_VERIFIED: &[Tool] = &[];

/// The remote field GitLab's model carries an issue's health in.
///
/// Named so the diagnostic can say *what* is missing rather than only that something
/// is: a reader told "GitLab cannot carry this" will not go looking for the flag.
const GITLAB_HEALTH_FIELD: &str = "health_status";

/// The remote field Linear's model would need for an issue's health. Linear has no
/// issue level health, so the constant names the field a future adapter would have to
/// introduce — and the mapping says which of the two reasons applies.
const LINEAR_HEALTH_FIELD: &str = "health";

/// Tools whose **model has no field** for an issue's health at all.
///
/// The claim is different from "the verb is not verified", and the message says
/// which, for the same reason `RELATION_CLI_ABSENT` does: a reader who is told
/// "GitLab can express this but the verb is unverified" will look for the verb.
const HEALTH_MODEL_ABSENT: &[Tool] = &[Tool::Linear];

/// Tools verified to drive the health field from their CLI.
///
/// Empty, and for the same reason `PARENT_WIRE_VERIFIED` is: whether `glab issue
/// create --health-status ...` exists is a claim about a program this repository
/// cannot run. The fakes in `tests/bin/` accept no health flag at all, which is
/// better evidence of the surface than an assumption made after it. Flipping a
/// tool on here is a one-line change plus its adapter implementation, once the
/// verb is confirmed by hand.
const HEALTH_WIRE_VERIFIED: &[Tool] = &[];

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// WP07 (mission roadmap-initiatives-01M3C8SX) — initiatives across a sync
// round trip
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
//
// ## What the adapters can actually express, checked rather than assumed
//
// An initiative is a portfolio-level record, and this module's plan is explicit
// that the sync side carries **unsupported-field diagnostics only** — no adapter
// gains an initiative sender here. The representability answer is still derived
// from the CLIs the adapters drive, and the two trackers' answers differ in
// *reason* even though both end at "nothing is sent":
//
// - **GitLab: the CLI has no initiative command at all.** `glab` 1.119.0 (checked
//   against the installed binary on 2026-10-09) lists no `initiative` command:
//   `glab --help` has `issue` and `milestone`, and its experimental `work-items`
//   tree covers epics, issues and tasks. GitLab's *model* has no initiative either.
//   That is a **permanent** answer, like [`RELATION_CLI_ABSENT`], and the wording
//   says so: a reader told "the verb is unverified" would wait for one, and there
//   is nothing to wait for.
// - **Linear: the verb exists, but it cannot hold the record.** `linear-cli` 0.3.28
//   (checked the same day) *does* expose `initiatives list|get|create|update|delete`;
//   `linear-cli initiatives list -o json` parses and fails only with `No workspace
//   selected` (exit 1), which is a grammar-level verification of the command line.
//   So the honest statement is not "there is no verb" — it is that the
//   `create`/`update` verbs take only a **name**, a **description** and a
//   **status**, so they cannot carry the local record's `owner`, `priority`,
//   `labels`, `target_date`, or its typed project/epic/milestone associations.
//   Sending the fields they *can* take while dropping the rest would be a silent
//   drop with extra steps (C-005/C-007), so the whole local record is kept.
//
// `INITIATIVE_WIRE_VERIFIED` is empty, and `initiative_absence_reason` carries the
// per-tool difference so the two answers never blur. The table exists rather than a
// bare `unsupported` constant for the same reason the parent/health tables do: a
// future tracker that models the whole record in its CLI is a one-line addition plus
// its `set_initiatives`.

/// The remote field an adapter would carry an initiative in.
///
/// Both trackers would name it `initiatives`, so — unlike a project association,
/// where the two models genuinely name different fields — a per-tool indirection
/// would carry no information. The per-tool difference lives in
/// [`initiative_absence_reason`], which is where it actually is.
const INITIATIVE_FIELD: &str = "initiatives";

/// Tools whose CLI is **verified to expose no initiative command at all**.
///
/// A *permanent* answer, distinct from "not yet verified", for the same reason
/// [`RELATION_CLI_ABSENT`] is: a reader told "the verb is unverified" will reasonably
/// wait for it, and `glab` has no such command to wait for.
const INITIATIVE_CLI_ABSENT: &[Tool] = &[Tool::GitLab];

/// Tools verified to drive an initiative from their CLI.
///
/// **Empty**, and deliberately so on both trackers. No adapter implements a
/// `set_initiatives`, and the one CLI that exposes initiative verbs
/// (`linear-cli`) cannot carry the record's fields — see the section header. The
/// table is the same shape as the other four so a future tracker that *does* model
/// the whole record is a one-line addition plus its adapter method.
const INITIATIVE_WIRE_VERIFIED: &[Tool] = &[];

const GITLAB_BLOCKING_FIELD: &str = "blocking";
const GITLAB_BLOCKING_VALUE: &str = "blocks";
const LINEAR_BLOCKING_FIELD: &str = "blocks";
const LINEAR_BLOCKING_VALUE: &str = "blocks";

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests;