test-better 0.2.0

Result-returning tests with `?`: composable matchers, rich failure output, no `.unwrap()`.
Documentation 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37

//! Compile-fail tests.
//!
//! `matches_struct!` without a trailing `..` expands to a struct pattern that
//! lists exactly the named fields, so a missing or unknown field is a hard
//! error from the destructure. A misplaced `..` is caught by the macro itself.
//!
//! The async `check!` case locks that the sync `satisfies` cannot be pointed
//! at a future with an output matcher: that path must go through `resolves_to`.

#[test]
fn structural_matcher_compile_errors() {
    let t = trybuild::TestCases::new();
    t.compile_fail("tests/ui/missing_field_without_rest.rs");
    t.compile_fail("tests/ui/unknown_field.rs");
    t.compile_fail("tests/ui/rest_not_last.rs");
}

#[test]
fn sync_satisfies_is_not_callable_on_a_future_subject() {
    let t = trybuild::TestCases::new();
    t.compile_fail("tests/ui/sync_satisfies_on_future.rs");
}

#[test]
fn test_case_attribute_compile_errors() {
    let t = trybuild::TestCases::new();
    t.compile_fail("tests/ui/test_case_wrong_arity.rs");
    t.compile_fail("tests/ui/test_case_trailing_garbage.rs");
    t.compile_fail("tests/ui/test_case_missing_label.rs");
}

#[test]
fn fixture_attribute_compile_errors() {
    let t = trybuild::TestCases::new();
    t.compile_fail("tests/ui/fixture_with_params.rs");
    t.compile_fail("tests/ui/fixture_bad_scope.rs");
}