spargio
spargio is a work-stealing io_uring-based async runtime for Rust, using msg_ring for cross-thread coordination.
Instead of a strict thread-per-core/share-nothing execution model like other io_uring runtimes (glommio/monoio/compio and tokio_uring), spargio uses submission-time steering of stealable tasks across threads (a novel form of work-stealing).
In our benchmarks (detailed below), spargio outperforms compio (and likely all share-nothing runtimes) in imbalanced or coordination-heavy workloads by up to 80%, and outperforms tokio for cases involving high coordination or disk I/O by up to 280%. compio leads for sustained, balanced workloads by up to 40%.
Out-of-the-box, we support async disk I/O, network I/O (including TLS/WebSockets/QUIC), process execution, and signal handling, and provide an extension API for additional io_uring operations. We support both tokio-style stealable tasks and compio-style pinned (thread-affine) tasks.
Disclaimer
spargio began as a proof of concept built with Codex to see if the idea is worth pursuing, and remains a work-in-progress. I have not reviewed all the code yet. Treat it as pre-alpha.
Quick start
Pre-requisites: Linux 6.0+ recommended (5.18+ for core io_uring + msg_ring paths)
Add spargio as a dependency:
Then use it for native I/O operations and stealable task spawning:
use ;
async
Tokio Integration
Recommended model today:
- Run Tokio and Spargio side-by-side.
- Exchange work/results through explicit boundaries (
spargio::boundary, channels, adapters). - Move selected hot paths into Spargio without forcing full dependency migration.
Note: uniquely to Spargio, a Tokio-compat readiness shim based on IORING_OP_POLL_ADD is possible to build on top of it without sacrificing work-stealing, but building and maintaining a dependency-transparent drop-in lane would be a large investment.
Inspirations and Further Reading
Using msg_ring for coordination is heavily inspired by ourio. We extend that idea to work-stealing.
Wondering whether to build a work-stealing pool using io_uring at all was inspired by the following (excellent) blog posts:
- https://emschwartz.me/async-rust-can-be-a-pleasure-to-work-with-without-send-sync-static/
- https://without.boats/blog/thread-per-core/
Terminology: Shards
In Spargio, a shard is one worker thread + its io_uring ring (SQ + CQ) + a local run/command queue. Internally within Spargio, we pass work from one shard to another by enqueueing work and injecting CQEs across shards, waking up a recipient worker thread to drain pending work from its queue.
Benchmark Results
Coordination-focused workloads (Tokio vs Spargio)
| Benchmark | Description | Tokio | Spargio | Speedup |
|---|---|---|---|---|
steady_ping_pong_rtt |
Two-worker request/ack round-trip loop | 1.4911-1.5024 ms |
394.83-396.21 us |
3.8x |
steady_one_way_send_drain |
One-way sends, then explicit drain barrier | 68.607-70.859 us |
49.232-50.110 us |
1.4x |
cold_start_ping_pong |
Includes runtime/harness startup and teardown | 553.31-561.83 us |
284.23-287.50 us |
2.0x |
fanout_fanin_balanced |
Even fanout/fanin across shards | 1.4534-1.4631 ms |
1.3426-1.3480 ms |
1.1x |
fanout_fanin_skewed |
Skewed fanout/fanin with hotspot pressure | 2.4026-2.4220 ms |
1.9979-2.0032 ms |
1.2x |
Compio is not listed in this coordination-only table because it is share-nothing (thread-per-core), while these cases are focused on cross-shard coordination behavior.
Native API workloads (Tokio vs Spargio vs Compio)
| Benchmark | Description | Tokio | Spargio | Compio | Spargio vs Tokio | Spargio vs Compio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
fs_read_rtt_4k (qd=1) |
4 KiB file read latency, depth 1 | 1.6174-1.6565 ms |
1.0008-1.0188 ms |
1.4782-1.4978 ms |
1.6x |
1.5x |
fs_read_throughput_4k_qd32 |
4 KiB file reads, queue depth 32 | 7.8804-8.1672 ms |
6.1570-6.2793 ms |
4.0877-5.0803 ms |
1.3x |
0.7x |
net_echo_rtt_256b (qd=1) |
256-byte TCP echo latency, depth 1 | 7.7462-7.9687 ms |
5.4356-5.5084 ms |
6.4541-6.5632 ms |
1.4x |
1.2x |
net_stream_throughput_4k_window32 |
4 KiB stream throughput, window 32 | 11.142-11.247 ms |
10.745-10.813 ms |
7.0631-7.1570 ms |
1.0x |
0.7x |
Imbalanced Native API workloads (Tokio vs Spargio vs Compio)
| Benchmark | Description | Tokio | Spargio | Compio | Spargio vs Tokio | Spargio vs Compio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
net_stream_imbalanced_4k_hot1_light7 |
8 streams, 1 static hot + 7 light, 4 KiB frames | 13.584-13.799 ms |
13.191-13.375 ms |
12.283-12.414 ms |
1.0x |
0.9x |
net_stream_hotspot_rotation_4k |
8 streams, rotating hotspot each step, I/O-only | 8.7891-8.8560 ms |
9.3683-9.4526 ms |
16.870-16.982 ms |
0.9x |
1.8x |
net_pipeline_hotspot_rotation_4k_window32 |
8 streams, rotating hotspot with recv/CPU/send pipeline | 26.415-26.654 ms |
29.113-29.517 ms |
50.648-51.210 ms |
0.9x |
1.7x |
net_keyed_hotspot_rotation_4k |
8 streams, rotating hotspot with keyed ownership routing | 9.3152-9.4912 ms |
9.5691-9.7957 ms |
16.781-16.994 ms |
1.0x |
1.7x |
Benchmark Interpretation
TL;DR: As expected, Spargio is strongest on coordination-heavy and low-depth latency workloads; Compio is strongest on sustained balanced stream throughput. Somewhat surprisingly, Tokio remains ahead in some rotating-hotspot network shapes.
- Spargio leads in coordination-heavy cross-shard cases versus Tokio (
steady_ping_pong_rtt,steady_one_way_send_drain,cold_start_ping_pong,fanout_fanin_*). - Spargio leads in low-depth fs/net latency (
fs_read_rtt_4k,net_echo_rtt_256b) versus both Tokio and Compio. - Compio leads in sustained balanced stream throughput and static-hotspot imbalance (
net_stream_throughput_4k_window32,net_stream_imbalanced_4k_hot1_light7), while Spargio is currently ahead of Tokio in both of those cases. - Tokio currently leads in rotating-hotspot stream/pipeline cases; keyed routing is near parity (
net_stream_hotspot_rotation_4k,net_pipeline_hotspot_rotation_4k_window32,net_keyed_hotspot_rotation_4k).
For performance, different workload shapes favor different runtimes.
What's Done
- Sharded runtime with Linux
IoUringbackend. - Cross-shard typed/raw messaging, nowait sends, batching, and flush tickets.
- Placement APIs:
Pinned,RoundRobin,Sticky,Stealable,StealablePreferred. - Work-stealing scheduler MVP with backpressure and runtime stats.
- Runtime primitives:
sleep,sleep_until,timeout,timeout_at,Interval/interval_at,Sleep(resettable deadline timer),CancellationToken, andTaskGroupcooperative cancellation. - Runtime entry ergonomics: async-first
spargio::run(...),spargio::run_with(builder, ...), and optional#[spargio::main(...)]viamacros. - Runtime utility bridge knobs:
RuntimeHandle::spawn_blocking(...)andRuntimeBuilder::thread_affinity(...). - Local
!Sendergonomics:run_local_on(...)andRuntimeHandle::spawn_local_on(...)for shard-pinned local futures. - Unbound native API:
RuntimeHandle::uring_native_unbound() -> UringNativeAnywith file ops (read_at,read_at_into,write_at,fsync) and stream/socket ops (recv,send,send_owned,recv_owned,send_all_batch,recv_multishot_segments), plus submission-time shard selector, FD affinity leases, and active op route tracking. - Low-level unsafe native extension API:
UringNativeAny::{submit_unsafe, submit_unsafe_on_shard}for custom SQE/CQE workflows in external extensions. - Safe native extension wrapper slice + cookbook:
spargio::extension::fs::{statx, statx_on_shard, statx_or_metadata}plusdocs/native_extension_cookbook.md. - Ergonomic fs/net APIs on top of native I/O:
spargio::fs::{OpenOptions, File}plus path helpers (create_dir*,rename,remove_*, metadata/link helpers,read/write), andspargio::net::{TcpListener, TcpStream, UdpSocket, UnixListener, UnixStream, UnixDatagram}. - Measured metadata fast path helper:
spargio::fs::metadata_lite(...)(statx-backed with fallback). - Native-first fs path-op lane on Linux io_uring for high-value helpers (
create_dir,remove_file,remove_dir,rename,hard_link,symlink), with compatibility fallback on unsupported opcode kernels. - Foundational I/O utility layer:
spargio::io::{AsyncRead, AsyncWrite, split, copy_to_vec, BufReader, BufWriter}andio::framed::LengthDelimited. - Native setup path on Linux io_uring lane:
open/connect/acceptare nonblocking and routed through native setup ops (no helper-threadrun_blockingwrappers in public fs/net setup APIs). - Native timeout path on io_uring lane:
UringNativeAny::sleep(...)and shard-contextspargio::sleep(...)route throughIORING_OP_TIMEOUT. - Async-first boundary APIs:
call,call_with_timeout,recv,recv_timeout, andBoundaryTicket::wait_timeout. - Explicit socket-address APIs that bypass DNS resolution:
connect_socket_addr*andbind_socket_addr. - Benchmark suites:
benches/ping_pong.rs,benches/fanout_fanin.rs,benches/fs_api.rs(Tokio/Spargio/Compio), andbenches/net_api.rs(Tokio/Spargio/Compio). - Mixed-runtime boundary API:
spargio::boundary. - Companion crate suite:
spargio-process,spargio-signal,spargio-protocols(legacy blocking bridge helpers),spargio-tls(rustls/futures-rustls adapter),spargio-ws(async-tungstenite adapter), andspargio-quicwith selectable backend mode (QuicBackend::Nativedefault dispatch and explicitQuicBackend::Bridgecompatibility fallback). - Native-vs-bridge QUIC cutover guardrails: native data path is validated to avoid bridge task spawning, while bridge mode remains explicit compatibility fallback.
- QUIC native default backend now runs on
quinn-protodriver path (NativeProtoDriver+ native UDP pump/timers) with stream/datagram operations routed through the driver; bridge mode remains explicit compatibility fallback. - Companion hardening lane:
scripts/companion_ci_smoke.shplus CIcompanion-matrixjob. - QUIC qualification lanes: interop matrix (
scripts/quic_interop_matrix.sh), soak/fault lane (scripts/quic_soak_fault.sh, nightly), and native-vs-bridge perf gate (scripts/quic_perf_gate.sh). - In-repo long-form docs scaffold:
book/(mdBook) with protocol/API-selection and migration chapters. - Reference mixed-mode service example.
What's Not Done Yet
- Full production-grade higher-level ecosystem parity is still in progress; companion crates now provide practical bridges and qualification lanes, but deeper protocol-specific maturity remains (broader TLS/WS tuning surfaces, richer process stdio orchestration, and deeper long-window failure coverage).
- QUIC backend hardening is still in progress: native default path is driver-backed now, but long-window soak/fault/perf requalification depth and rollout maturity (
rollout_stage) still need production validation. - Multi-endpoint QUIC sharding/fan-out orchestration is not built in yet: a single
QuicEndpointstill owns one native transport backend, so multi-core listener scaling is currently a manual multi-endpoint deployment pattern. - Native directory traversal and full
dumetadata parity are not finished yet: there is no built-in asyncgetdents/read_dirsurface, andstatxexposure is still a lite subset (for example, allocated-block and hardlink-dedupe oriented fields are not all surfaced yet). - Hostname-based
ToSocketAddrsconnect/bind paths can still block for DNS resolution; use explicitSocketAddrAPIs (connect_socket_addr*,bind_socket_addr) for strictly non-DNS data-plane paths. - Remaining fs helper migration to native io_uring where it is not a clear win is deferred:
canonicalize,metadata,symlink_metadata, andset_permissionscurrently use compatibility blocking paths (create_dir_allis native-first for straightforward paths;metadata_liteexists as native-first metadata alternative). - Production hardening beyond smoke lanes: deeper failure-injection/soak coverage, broader observability for companion protocol paths, and long-window p95/p99 gates.
- Advanced work-stealing policy tuning beyond current MVP heuristics.
- Expand
book/coverage into deeper API-selection, placement, and operations guides. - Optional Tokio-compat readiness emulation shim (
IORING_OP_POLL_ADD) is explicitly deprioritized for now (backlog-only, not planned right now).
Contributor Quick Start
Benchmark helpers:
Reference app:
Runtime Entry
Helper-based entry:
async
Attribute-macro entry (enable with --features macros):
async
This takes two optional arguments. Without them, #[spargio::main] uses sensible defaults: io_uring backend and shard count from available CPU parallelism. Use macro arguments only when you need explicit overrides.
Repository Map
src/lib.rs: runtime implementation.tests/: TDD coverage.benches/: Criterion benchmarks.examples/: mixed-mode reference app.scripts/: benchmark smoke/guard helpers..github/workflows/: CI gates.IMPLEMENTATION_LOG.md: implementation and benchmark log.architecture_decision_records/: ADRs.
Connection Placement Best Practices
- Use
spargio::net::TcpStream::connect(...)for simple or latency-first paths (few streams, short-lived connections). - Use
spargio::net::TcpStream::connect_many_round_robin(...)(orconnect_with_session_policy(..., RoundRobin)) for sustained multi-stream throughput workloads. - For per-stream hot I/O loops, pair round-robin stream setup with
stream.spawn_on_session(...)to keep execution aligned with the stream session shard. - Use stealable task placement when post-I/O CPU work is dominant and can benefit from migration.
- As a practical starting heuristic: if active stream count is at least
2xshard count and streams are long-lived, prefer round-robin/distributed mode.
Engineering Method
Development style is red/green TDD:
- Add failing tests.
- Implement minimal passing behavior.
- Validate with full test and benchmark checks.
License
This project is licensed under the MIT License. See LICENSE.
Contribution
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted
for inclusion in spargio by you shall be licensed as MIT, without any
additional terms or conditions.