use super::gpt4_agent::{CognitiveAgent, ExecutionTrace, Insight, ProposedEdit};
use crate::dag::Node;
use crate::memory::SymbolicContext;
pub struct ClaudeAgent;
impl CognitiveAgent for ClaudeAgent {
fn propose_edit(&self, ctx: &SymbolicContext) -> ProposedEdit {
let task = ctx.resolve_or_default("current_task", "general improvement");
if task.contains("readability") {
ProposedEdit {
file: "src/types.rs".to_string(),
line_range: (15, 20),
new_code: "// Claude: Improved struct with clear documentation\n/// Represents a cognitive agent with enhanced capabilities\n#[derive(Debug, Clone)]\npub struct CognitiveAgent {\n /// Unique identifier for the agent\n pub id: String,\n}".to_string(),
reason: "Improved code readability with comprehensive documentation".to_string(),
confidence: 0.94,
}
} else if task.contains("architecture") {
ProposedEdit {
file: "src/dag.rs".to_string(),
line_range: (25, 30),
new_code: "// Claude: Modular design pattern implementation\ntrait NodeProcessor {\n fn process(&self, node: &Node) -> Result<ProcessResult, Error>;\n}\n\npub struct DefaultProcessor;".to_string(),
reason: "Architectural improvement using trait-based design patterns".to_string(),
confidence: 0.91,
}
} else {
ProposedEdit {
file: "src/ops.rs".to_string(),
line_range: (20, 22),
new_code: "// Claude: Refactored for better separation of concerns\n/// Handles symbolic operations with clear responsibility separation\npub mod symbolic_ops {".to_string(),
reason: "Improved code organization and separation of concerns".to_string(),
confidence: 0.89,
}
}
}
fn reason_about_code(&self, file: &str, lines: &[String]) -> Insight {
Insight {
summary: format!("Claude review of {} ({} lines)", file, lines.len()),
details: "Looks good overall.".to_string(),
confidence: 0.88,
}
}
fn simulate(&self, phase: &str, dag: &[Node]) -> Vec<ExecutionTrace> {
dag.iter()
.map(|node| ExecutionTrace {
phase: phase.to_string(),
node_id: node.id.clone(),
result: "ok".to_string(),
})
.collect()
}
}