1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
use ;
/// Bias/precession/nutation, IAU 2000A
///
/// Precession-nutation, IAU 2000A model: a multi-purpose function,
/// supporting classical (equinox-based) use directly and CIO-based
/// use indirectly.
///
/// This function is part of the International Astronomical Union's
/// SOFA (Standards of Fundamental Astronomy) software collection.
///
/// Status: support function.
///
/// Given:
/// date1,date2 double TT as a 2-part Julian Date (Note 1)
///
/// Returned (function value):
/// (dpsi, deps, epsa, rb, rp, rbp, rn, rbpn) (f64, f64, f64, [[f64; 3]; 3], [[f64; 3]; 3], [[f64; 3]; 3], [[f64; 3]; 3], [[f64; 3]; 3])
///
/// dpsi,deps nutation (Note 2)
/// epsa mean obliquity (Note 3)
/// rb frame bias matrix (Note 4)
/// rp precession matrix (Note 5)
/// rbp bias-precession matrix (Note 6)
/// rn nutation matrix (Note 7)
/// rbpn GCRS-to-true matrix (Notes 8,9)
///
/// Notes:
///
/// 1) The TT date date1+date2 is a Julian Date, apportioned in any
/// convenient way between the two arguments. For example,
/// JD(TT)=2450123.7 could be expressed in any of these ways,
/// among others:
///
/// date1 date2
///
/// 2450123.7 0.0 (JD method)
/// 2451545.0 -1421.3 (J2000 method)
/// 2400000.5 50123.2 (MJD method)
/// 2450123.5 0.2 (date & time method)
///
/// The JD method is the most natural and convenient to use in
/// cases where the loss of several decimal digits of resolution
/// is acceptable. The J2000 method is best matched to the way
/// the argument is handled internally and will deliver the
/// optimum resolution. The MJD method and the date & time methods
/// are both good compromises between resolution and convenience.
///
/// 2) The nutation components (luni-solar + planetary, IAU 2000A) in
/// longitude and obliquity are in radians and with respect to the
/// equinox and ecliptic of date. Free core nutation is omitted;
/// for the utmost accuracy, use the iauPn00 function, where the
/// nutation components are caller-specified. For faster but
/// slightly less accurate results, use the iauPn00b function.
///
/// 3) The mean obliquity is consistent with the IAU 2000 precession.
///
/// 4) The matrix rb transforms vectors from GCRS to J2000.0 mean
/// equator and equinox by applying frame bias.
///
/// 5) The matrix rp transforms vectors from J2000.0 mean equator and
/// equinox to mean equator and equinox of date by applying
/// precession.
///
/// 6) The matrix rbp transforms vectors from GCRS to mean equator and
/// equinox of date by applying frame bias then precession. It is
/// the product rp x rb.
///
/// 7) The matrix rn transforms vectors from mean equator and equinox
/// of date to true equator and equinox of date by applying the
/// nutation (luni-solar + planetary).
///
/// 8) The matrix rbpn transforms vectors from GCRS to true equator and
/// equinox of date. It is the product rn x rbp, applying frame
/// bias, precession and nutation in that order.
///
/// 9) The X,Y,Z coordinates of the IAU 2000A Celestial Intermediate
/// Pole are elements (3,1-3) of the GCRS-to-true matrix,
/// i.e. rbpn[2][0-2].
///
/// Called:
/// iauNut00a nutation, IAU 2000A
/// iauPn00 bias/precession/nutation results, IAU 2000
///
/// Reference:
///
/// Capitaine, N., Chapront, J., Lambert, S. and Wallace, P.,
/// "Expressions for the Celestial Intermediate Pole and Celestial
/// Ephemeris Origin consistent with the IAU 2000A precession-
/// nutation model", Astron.Astrophys. 400, 1145-1154 (2003)
///
/// n.b. The celestial ephemeris origin (CEO) was renamed "celestial
/// intermediate origin" (CIO) by IAU 2006 Resolution 2.