slop_basefold/

verifier.rs

use itertools::Itertools;
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
use slop_algebra::{AbstractExtensionField, AbstractField, TwoAdicField};
use slop_challenger::{
    CanObserve, CanSampleBits, FieldChallenger, GrindingChallenger, IopCtx,
    VariableLengthChallenger,
};
use slop_merkle_tree::{MerkleTreeOpeningAndProof, MerkleTreeTcs, MerkleTreeTcsError};
use slop_multilinear::{partial_lagrange_blocking, MleEval, MultilinearPcsChallenger, Point};
use slop_utils::reverse_bits_len;
use thiserror::Error;

pub use slop_primitives::FriConfig;

#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct BasefoldVerifier<GC: IopCtx> {
    pub fri_config: crate::FriConfig<GC::F>,
    pub tcs: MerkleTreeTcs<GC>,
    pub num_expected_commitments: usize,
}

impl<GC: IopCtx> std::fmt::Debug for BasefoldVerifier<GC> {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
        f.debug_struct("BasefoldVerifier")
            .field("fri_config", &self.fri_config)
            .field("num_expected_commitments", &self.num_expected_commitments)
            .finish()
    }
}

impl<GC: IopCtx> BasefoldVerifier<GC> {
    pub fn new(fri_config: crate::FriConfig<GC::F>, num_expected_commitments: usize) -> Self {
        assert_ne!(num_expected_commitments, 0, "commitment must exist");
        Self { fri_config, tcs: MerkleTreeTcs::default(), num_expected_commitments }
    }
}

#[derive(Error)]
pub enum BaseFoldVerifierError<TcsError> {
    #[error("Sumcheck and FRI commitments length mismatch")]
    SumcheckFriLengthMismatch,
    #[error("Query failed to verify: {0}")]
    TcsError(#[from] TcsError),
    #[error("Sumcheck error")]
    Sumcheck,
    #[error("Invalid proof of work witness")]
    Pow,
    #[error("Query value mismatch")]
    QueryValueMismatch,
    #[error("query final polynomial mismatch")]
    QueryFinalPolyMismatch,
    #[error("sumcheck final polynomial mismatch")]
    SumcheckFinalPolyMismatch,
    #[error("incorrect shape of proof")]
    IncorrectShape,
    #[error("instance overflows the field two_adicity")]
    TwoAdicityOverflow,
}

impl<TcsError: std::fmt::Display> std::fmt::Debug for BaseFoldVerifierError<TcsError> {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
        match self {
            BaseFoldVerifierError::SumcheckFriLengthMismatch => {
                write!(f, "sumcheck and FRI commitments length mismatch")
            }
            BaseFoldVerifierError::TcsError(e) => write!(f, "tensor opening error: {e}"),
            BaseFoldVerifierError::Sumcheck => write!(f, "sumcheck error"),
            BaseFoldVerifierError::Pow => write!(f, "invalid proof of work witness"),
            BaseFoldVerifierError::QueryValueMismatch => write!(f, "query value mismatch"),
            BaseFoldVerifierError::QueryFinalPolyMismatch => {
                write!(f, "query final polynomial mismatch")
            }
            BaseFoldVerifierError::SumcheckFinalPolyMismatch => {
                write!(f, "sumcheck final polynomial mismatch")
            }
            BaseFoldVerifierError::IncorrectShape => {
                write!(f, "incorrect shape of proof")
            }
            BaseFoldVerifierError::TwoAdicityOverflow => {
                write!(f, "instance overflows the field two_adicity")
            }
        }
    }
}

/// A proof of a Basefold evaluation claim.
#[derive(Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)]
#[serde(bound(serialize = "", deserialize = ""))]
pub struct BasefoldProof<GC: IopCtx> {
    /// The univariate polynomials that are used in the sumcheck part of the BaseFold protocol.
    pub univariate_messages: Vec<[GC::EF; 2]>,
    /// The FRI parts of the proof.
    /// The commitments to the folded polynomials produced in the commit phase.
    pub fri_commitments: Vec<GC::Digest>,
    /// The query openings for the individual multilinear polynmomials.
    ///
    /// The vector is indexed by the batch number.
    pub component_polynomials_query_openings_and_proofs: Vec<MerkleTreeOpeningAndProof<GC>>,
    /// The query openings and the FRI query proofs for the FRI query phase.
    pub query_phase_openings_and_proofs: Vec<MerkleTreeOpeningAndProof<GC>>,
    /// The prover performs FRI until we reach a polynomial of degree 0, and return the constant
    /// value of this polynomial.
    pub final_poly: GC::EF,
    /// Proof-of-work witness.
    pub pow_witness: <GC::Challenger as GrindingChallenger>::Witness,
}

impl<GC: IopCtx> BasefoldVerifier<GC>
where
    GC::F: TwoAdicField,
{
    pub fn verify_mle_evaluations(
        &self,
        commitments: &[GC::Digest],
        mut point: Point<GC::EF>,
        evaluation_claims: &[MleEval<GC::EF>],
        proof: &BasefoldProof<GC>,
        challenger: &mut GC::Challenger,
    ) -> Result<(), BaseFoldVerifierError<MerkleTreeTcsError>> {
        // Sample the challenge used to batch all the different polynomials.
        let total_len = evaluation_claims
            .iter()
            .map(|batch_claims| batch_claims.num_polynomials())
            .sum::<usize>();

        let num_batching_variables = total_len.next_power_of_two().ilog2();
        let batching_point = challenger.sample_point::<GC::EF>(num_batching_variables);
        let batching_coefficients = partial_lagrange_blocking(&batching_point);

        // Compute the batched evaluation claim.
        let eval_claim = evaluation_claims
            .iter()
            .flat_map(|batch_claims| batch_claims.iter())
            .zip(batching_coefficients.as_slice())
            .map(|(eval, batch_power)| *eval * *batch_power)
            .sum::<GC::EF>();

        if evaluation_claims.len() != commitments.len()
            || commitments.len() != proof.component_polynomials_query_openings_and_proofs.len()
            || commitments.len() != self.num_expected_commitments
        {
            return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::IncorrectShape);
        }

        // Assert correctness of shape.
        if proof.fri_commitments.len() != proof.univariate_messages.len()
            || proof.fri_commitments.len() != point.dimension()
            || proof.univariate_messages.is_empty()
        {
            return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::SumcheckFriLengthMismatch);
        }

        // The prover messages correspond to fixing the last coordinate first, so we reverse the
        // underlying point for the verification.
        point.reverse();

        // Sample the challenges used for FRI folding and BaseFold random linear combinations.
        // Observe the number of FRI rounds. In principle, the prover should already be
        // bound to this length because it is deducible from the shape of the openings in
        // `proof.component_polynomials_query_openings_and_proofs` and the prover is bound to those,
        // but we observe it here for security.
        let len = proof.fri_commitments.len();
        challenger.observe(GC::F::from_canonical_usize(len));
        let betas = proof
            .fri_commitments
            .iter()
            .zip_eq(proof.univariate_messages.iter())
            .map(|(commitment, poly)| {
                challenger.observe_constant_length_extension_slice(poly);
                challenger.observe(*commitment);
                challenger.sample_ext_element::<GC::EF>()
            })
            .collect::<Vec<_>>();

        // Check the consistency of the first univariate message with the claimed evaluation. The
        // first_poly is supposed to be `vals(X_0, X_1, ..., X_{d-1}, 0), vals(X_0, X_1, ...,
        // X_{d-1}, 1)`. Given this, the claimed evaluation should be `(1 - X_d) *
        // first_poly[0] + X_d * first_poly[1]`.
        let first_poly = proof.univariate_messages[0];
        if eval_claim != (GC::EF::one() - *point[0]) * first_poly[0] + *point[0] * first_poly[1] {
            println!("failed in first_poly");
            return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::Sumcheck);
        };

        // Fold the two messages into a single evaluation claim for the next round, using the
        // sampled randomness.
        let mut expected_eval = first_poly[0] + betas[0] * first_poly[1];

        // Check round-by-round consistency between the successive sumcheck univariate messages.
        for (i, (poly, beta)) in
            proof.univariate_messages[1..].iter().zip_eq(betas[1..].iter()).enumerate()
        {
            // The check is similar to the one for `first_poly`.
            let i = i + 1;
            if expected_eval != (GC::EF::one() - *point[i]) * poly[0] + *point[i] * poly[1] {
                println!("failed in round {i}");
                return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::Sumcheck);
            }

            // Fold the two pieces of the message.
            expected_eval = poly[0] + *beta * poly[1];
        }

        challenger.observe_ext_element(proof.final_poly);

        // Check proof of work (grinding to find a number that hashes to have
        // `self.config.proof_of_work_bits` zeroes at the beginning).
        if !challenger.check_witness(self.fri_config.proof_of_work_bits, proof.pow_witness) {
            return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::Pow);
        }

        let log_len = proof.fri_commitments.len();

        if log_len + self.fri_config.log_blowup() > GC::F::TWO_ADICITY {
            return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::TwoAdicityOverflow);
        }

        // Sample query indices for the FRI query IOPP part of BaseFold. This part is very similar
        // to the corresponding part in the univariate FRI verifier.
        let query_indices = (0..self.fri_config.num_queries)
            .map(|_| challenger.sample_bits(log_len + self.fri_config.log_blowup()))
            .collect::<Vec<_>>();

        // Compute the batch evaluations from the openings of the component polynomials.
        let mut batch_evals = vec![GC::EF::zero(); query_indices.len()];
        let mut batch_idx = 0;
        for (round_idx, opening_and_proof) in
            proof.component_polynomials_query_openings_and_proofs.iter().enumerate()
        {
            let values = &opening_and_proof.values;
            let total_columns = evaluation_claims[round_idx].num_polynomials();
            if values.dimensions.sizes().len() != 2 {
                return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::IncorrectShape);
            }
            if values.dimensions.sizes()[0] != query_indices.len() {
                return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::IncorrectShape);
            }
            if values.dimensions.sizes()[1] != total_columns {
                return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::IncorrectShape);
            }
            let round_coefficients =
                &batching_coefficients.as_slice()[batch_idx..batch_idx + total_columns];
            for (batch_eval, values) in batch_evals.iter_mut().zip_eq(values.split()) {
                for (value, batching_coefficient) in
                    values.as_slice().iter().zip(round_coefficients)
                {
                    *batch_eval += *batching_coefficient * *value;
                }
            }
            batch_idx += total_columns;
        }

        // Verify the proof of the claimed values of the original commitments at the query indices.
        for (commit, opening_and_proof) in
            commitments.iter().zip_eq(proof.component_polynomials_query_openings_and_proofs.iter())
        {
            if opening_and_proof.proof.log_tensor_height != log_len + self.fri_config.log_blowup() {
                return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::IncorrectShape);
            }
            self.tcs
                .verify_tensor_openings(
                    commit,
                    &query_indices,
                    &opening_and_proof.values,
                    &opening_and_proof.proof,
                )
                .map_err(BaseFoldVerifierError::TcsError)?;
        }

        // Check that the query openings are consistent as FRI messages.
        self.verify_queries(
            &proof.fri_commitments,
            &query_indices,
            proof.final_poly,
            batch_evals,
            &proof.query_phase_openings_and_proofs,
            &betas,
        )?;

        // The final consistency check between the FRI messages and the partial evaluation messages.
        if proof.final_poly
            != proof.univariate_messages.last().unwrap()[0]
                + *betas.last().unwrap() * proof.univariate_messages.last().unwrap()[1]
        {
            return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::SumcheckFinalPolyMismatch);
        }

        Ok(())
    }

    /// The FRI verifier for a single query. We modify this from Plonky3 to be compatible with
    /// opening only a single vector.
    fn verify_queries(
        &self,
        commitments: &[GC::Digest],
        indices: &[usize],
        final_poly: GC::EF,
        reduced_openings: Vec<GC::EF>,
        query_openings: &[MerkleTreeOpeningAndProof<GC>],
        betas: &[GC::EF],
    ) -> Result<(), BaseFoldVerifierError<MerkleTreeTcsError>> {
        let log_max_height = commitments.len() + self.fri_config.log_blowup();

        let mut folded_evals = reduced_openings;
        let mut indices = indices.to_vec();

        let mut xis = indices
            .iter()
            .map(|index| {
                GC::F::two_adic_generator(log_max_height)
                    .exp_u64(reverse_bits_len(*index, log_max_height) as u64)
            })
            .collect::<Vec<_>>();

        if commitments.len() != query_openings.len() || commitments.len() != betas.len() {
            return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::IncorrectShape);
        }

        // Loop over the FRI queries.
        for (round_idx, ((commitment, query_opening), beta)) in (self.fri_config.log_blowup()
            ..log_max_height)
            .rev()
            .zip_eq(commitments.iter().zip_eq(query_openings.iter()).zip_eq(betas))
        {
            let openings = &query_opening.values;
            if openings.dimensions.sizes().len() != 2 {
                return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::IncorrectShape);
            }

            if indices.len() != folded_evals.len()
                || indices.len() != openings.dimensions.sizes()[0]
                || indices.len() != xis.len()
            {
                return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::IncorrectShape);
            }

            for (((index, folded_eval), opening), x) in indices
                .iter_mut()
                .zip_eq(folded_evals.iter_mut())
                .zip_eq(openings.split())
                .zip_eq(xis.iter_mut())
            {
                let index_sibling = *index ^ 1;
                let index_pair = *index >> 1;

                if opening.total_len() != 2 * <GC::EF as AbstractExtensionField<GC::F>>::D {
                    return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::IncorrectShape);
                }

                let evals: [GC::EF; 2] = opening
                    .as_slice()
                    .chunks_exact(GC::EF::D)
                    .map(GC::EF::from_base_slice)
                    .collect::<Vec<_>>()
                    .try_into()
                    .unwrap();

                // Check that the folded evaluation is consistent with the FRI query proof opening.
                if evals[*index % 2] != *folded_eval {
                    return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::QueryValueMismatch);
                }

                let mut xs = [*x; 2];
                xs[index_sibling % 2] *= GC::F::two_adic_generator(1);

                // interpolate and evaluate at beta
                *folded_eval = evals[0]
                    + (*beta - xs[0]) * (evals[1] - evals[0]) / GC::EF::from(xs[1] - xs[0]);

                *index = index_pair;
                *x = x.square();
            }

            // The magic constant 2 here is the folding factor we use for FRI.
            if round_idx != query_opening.proof.log_tensor_height
                || query_opening.proof.width != GC::EF::D * 2
            {
                return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::IncorrectShape);
            }

            // Check that the opening is consistent with the commitment.
            self.tcs
                .verify_tensor_openings(
                    commitment,
                    &indices,
                    &query_opening.values,
                    &query_opening.proof,
                )
                .map_err(BaseFoldVerifierError::TcsError)?;
        }

        for folded_eval in folded_evals {
            if folded_eval != final_poly {
                return Err(BaseFoldVerifierError::QueryFinalPolyMismatch);
            }
        }

        Ok(())
    }

    pub fn verify_untrusted_evaluations(
        &self,
        commitments: &[GC::Digest],
        eval_point: Point<GC::EF>,
        evaluation_claims: &[MleEval<GC::EF>],
        proof: &BasefoldProof<GC>,
        challenger: &mut GC::Challenger,
    ) -> Result<(), BaseFoldVerifierError<MerkleTreeTcsError>> {
        // Observe the evaluation claims.
        for round in evaluation_claims.iter() {
            // We assume that in the process of producing `commitments`, the prover is bound
            // to the number of polynomials in each round. Thus, we can observe the evaluation
            // claims without observing their length.
            challenger.observe_constant_length_extension_slice(round);
        }

        self.verify_mle_evaluations(commitments, eval_point, evaluation_claims, proof, challenger)
    }
}