1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
//! Comparison of DAE solver methods
//!
//! This example compares the performance and accuracy of different DAE solver methods:
//! 1. Basic approach: Converting DAE to ODE by solving constraints
//! 2. Standard BDF: Using general BDF methods from ODE solvers
//! 3. Specialized BDF: Using DAE-specific BDF methods
//!
//! The test problem is a simple pendulum DAE system, which we can solve analytically
//! for comparison purposes.
#![allow(dead_code)]
use scirs2_core::ndarray::{array, Array1, ArrayView1};
use scirs2_core::numeric::Float;
// use plotters::prelude::*;
use scirs2_integrate::{
bdf_semi_explicit_dae, solve_ivp, solve_semi_explicit_dae, DAEIndex, DAEOptions, DAEType,
ODEMethod, ODEOptions,
};
use std::time::Instant;
#[allow(dead_code)]
fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
println!("Comparing DAE solver methods for a pendulum system");
// Constants
let g = 9.81f64; // Gravitational acceleration (m/s²)
let length = 1.0; // Pendulum length (m)
// Initial conditions (pendulum released from 45 degrees)
let theta0 = std::f64::consts::PI / 4.0;
let x0 = length * theta0.sin();
let y0 = -length * theta0.cos();
let vx0 = 0.0;
let vy0 = 0.0;
// Combine into a single differential variables array
let diff_vars_0 = array![x0, y0, vx0, vy0];
// Initial Lagrange multiplier (algebraic variable)
let lambda0 = g / (2.0 * length); // Value at equilibrium
let alg_vars_0 = array![lambda0];
// Define the time span for the integration (0 to 5 seconds)
let t_span = [0.0, 5.0];
// Define the system of differential equations for the pendulum
let f = |_t: f64, diff_vars: ArrayView1<f64>, alg_vars: ArrayView1<f64>| {
let x = diff_vars[0];
let y = diff_vars[1];
let vx = diff_vars[2];
let vy = diff_vars[3];
let lambda = alg_vars[0];
// x' = vx
// y' = vy
// vx' = -lambda*x
// vy' = -g - lambda*y
array![vx, vy, -lambda * x, -g - lambda * y]
};
// Define the constraint equation (the pendulum has fixed length)
let g_constraint = |_t: f64, diff_vars: ArrayView1<f64>, _alg_vars: ArrayView1<f64>| {
let x = diff_vars[0];
let y = diff_vars[1];
// Constraint: x² + y² - L² = 0
array![x * x + y * y - length * length]
};
// Sample points for final comparison
let n_sample = 100;
let dt = (t_span[1] - t_span[0]) / (n_sample as f64);
let sample_times: Vec<f64> = (0..=n_sample)
.map(|i| t_span[0] + dt * (i as f64))
.collect();
// Run analytical solution for comparison
let _analytical = compute_analytical_solution(g, length, theta0, &sample_times);
// Store results for comparison
let mut solver_methods = vec![];
let mut solution_times = vec![];
let mut solution_errors = vec![];
let mut constraint_violations = vec![];
// 1. Run solver using the general DAE approach
println!("\nRunning general DAE solver...");
let start_time = Instant::now();
let options = DAEOptions {
dae_type: DAEType::SemiExplicit,
index: DAEIndex::Index1,
rtol: 1e-6,
atol: 1e-8,
max_steps: 10000,
max_newton_iterations: 10,
newton_tol: 1e-8,
h0: Some(0.01),
min_step: Some(1e-10),
max_step: Some(0.1),
method: ODEMethod::Bdf,
..Default::default()
};
let result_general = solve_semi_explicit_dae(
f,
g_constraint,
t_span,
diff_vars_0.clone(),
alg_vars_0.clone(),
Some(options.clone()),
)?;
let elapsed_general = start_time.elapsed();
// Compute error metrics
let (error_general, violation_general) =
compute_error_metrics(&result_general, g, length, theta0, g_constraint);
solver_methods.push("General DAE".to_string());
solution_times.push(elapsed_general.as_secs_f64());
solution_errors.push(error_general);
constraint_violations.push(violation_general);
println!(" Time: {:.6} seconds", elapsed_general.as_secs_f64());
println!(" Error: {error_general:.6e}");
println!(" Constraint violation: {violation_general:.6e}");
println!(" Steps: {}", result_general.n_steps);
// 2. Run solver using standard ODE solver with constraints solved at each step
// This is a simplified approach where we convert the DAE to an ODE by solving
// the constraint at each step using Newton's method
println!("\nRunning ODE solver with constraints solved at each step...");
let start_time = Instant::now();
// Define the ODE system (without lambdas)
let f_ode = |_t: f64, y: ArrayView1<f64>| {
let x = y[0];
let y_pos = y[1];
let vx = y[2];
let vy = y[3];
// Calculate lambda from the acceleration constraint
// x*x'' + y*y'' + vx² + vy² = 0
// x*(-lambda*x) + y*(-g - lambda*y) + vx² + vy² = 0
// -lambda*(x² + y²) - g*y + vx² + vy² = 0
// lambda = (vx² + vy² - g*y) / (x² + y²)
let v_squared = vx * vx + vy * vy;
let lambda = (v_squared - g * y_pos) / (x * x + y_pos * y_pos);
array![vx, vy, -lambda * x, -g - lambda * y_pos]
};
let ode_options = ODEOptions {
method: ODEMethod::Bdf,
rtol: 1e-6,
atol: 1e-8,
max_steps: 10000,
h0: Some(0.01),
min_step: Some(1e-10),
max_step: Some(0.1),
..Default::default()
};
let result_ode = solve_ivp(f_ode, t_span, diff_vars_0.clone(), Some(ode_options))?;
let elapsed_ode = start_time.elapsed();
// Compute error metrics for ODE solution
// We'll need to adapt the error calculation for the ODE solution format
let mut error_ode = 0.0;
let mut violation_ode = 0.0;
for i in 0..result_ode.t.len() {
let t = result_ode.t[i];
let x = result_ode.y[i][0];
let y = result_ode.y[i][1];
// Calculate analytical solution at this time
let theta_analytical = theta0 * (g / length).sqrt() * t;
let x_analytical = length * theta_analytical.sin();
let y_analytical = -length * theta_analytical.cos();
// Error is the Euclidean distance between numerical and analytical solution
let error_at_t = ((x - x_analytical).powi(2) + (y - y_analytical).powi(2)).sqrt();
error_ode = error_ode.max(error_at_t);
// Constraint violation is how far off we are from the fixed length
let constraint_at_t = (x * x + y * y - length * length).abs();
violation_ode = violation_ode.max(constraint_at_t);
}
solver_methods.push("ODE with Constraints".to_string());
solution_times.push(elapsed_ode.as_secs_f64());
solution_errors.push(error_ode);
constraint_violations.push(violation_ode);
println!(" Time: {:.6} seconds", elapsed_ode.as_secs_f64());
println!(" Error: {error_ode:.6e}");
println!(" Constraint violation: {violation_ode:.6e}");
println!(" Steps: {}", result_ode.n_steps);
// 3. Run solver using specialized BDF method for DAEs
println!("\nRunning specialized BDF DAE solver...");
let start_time = Instant::now();
let result_bdf = bdf_semi_explicit_dae(
f,
g_constraint,
t_span,
diff_vars_0.clone(),
alg_vars_0.clone(),
options,
)?;
let elapsed_bdf = start_time.elapsed();
// Compute error metrics
let (error_bdf, violation_bdf) =
compute_error_metrics(&result_bdf, g, length, theta0, g_constraint);
solver_methods.push("Specialized BDF".to_string());
solution_times.push(elapsed_bdf.as_secs_f64());
solution_errors.push(error_bdf);
constraint_violations.push(violation_bdf);
println!(" Time: {:.6} seconds", elapsed_bdf.as_secs_f64());
println!(" Error: {error_bdf:.6e}");
println!(" Constraint violation: {violation_bdf:.6e}");
println!(" Steps: {}", result_bdf.n_steps);
// Print performance comparison
println!("\nPerformance Comparison:");
println!(
"{:<20} {:<15} {:<15} {:<15} {:<10}",
"Method", "Time (s)", "Max Error", "Constraint Viol.", "Steps"
);
println!("{:-<65}", "");
for i in 0..solver_methods.len() {
let method = &solver_methods[i];
let time = solution_times[i];
let error = solution_errors[i];
let violation = constraint_violations[i];
println!(
"{:<20} {:<15.6} {:<15.6e} {:<15.6e} {:<10}",
method,
time,
error,
violation,
match i {
0 => result_general.n_steps,
1 => result_ode.n_steps,
2 => result_bdf.n_steps,
_ => 0,
}
);
}
// Save trajectories for visualization (disabled due to missing dependencies)
/*
let root = BitMapBackend::new("dae_comparison_trajectory.png", (800, 600)).into_drawing_area();
root.fill(&WHITE)?;
let min_x = -length * 1.1;
let max_x = length * 1.1;
let min_y = -length * 1.1;
let max_y = length * 1.1;
let mut chart = ChartBuilder::on(&root)
.caption("Pendulum Trajectory Comparison", ("sans-serif", 30))
.margin(10)
.x_label_area_size(40)
.y_label_area_size(40)
.build_cartesian_2d(min_x..max_x, min_y..max_y)?;
chart.configure_mesh().x_labels(10).y_labels(10).draw()?;
// Analytical trajectory (circle)
let n_points = 100;
let analytical_circle: Vec<(f64, f64)> = (0..=n_points)
.map(|i| {
let angle = 2.0 * std::f64::consts::PI * (i as f64) / (n_points as f64);
(length * angle.sin(), -length * angle.cos())
})
.collect();
chart
.draw_series(LineSeries::new(analytical_circle, &BLACK.mix(0.5)))?
.label("Analytical (Circle)")
.legend(|(x, y)| PathElement::new(vec![(x, y), (x + 20, y)], &BLACK.mix(0.5)));
// General DAE solution
let general_trajectory: Vec<(f64, f64)> =
result_general.x.iter().map(|q| (q[0], q[1])).collect();
chart
.draw_series(LineSeries::new(general_trajectory, &RED))?
.label("General DAE")
.legend(|(x, y)| PathElement::new(vec![(x, y), (x + 20, y)], &RED));
// ODE solution
let ode_trajectory: Vec<(f64, f64)> = result_ode.y.iter().map(|q| (q[0], q[1])).collect();
chart
.draw_series(LineSeries::new(ode_trajectory, &GREEN))?
.label("ODE with Constraints")
.legend(|(x, y)| PathElement::new(vec![(x, y), (x + 20, y)], &GREEN));
// Specialized BDF solution
let bdf_trajectory: Vec<(f64, f64)> = result_bdf.x.iter().map(|q| (q[0], q[1])).collect();
chart
.draw_series(LineSeries::new(bdf_trajectory, &BLUE))?
.label("Specialized BDF")
.legend(|(x, y)| PathElement::new(vec![(x, y), (x + 20, y)], &BLUE));
chart
.configure_series_labels()
.background_style(&WHITE.mix(0.8))
.border_style(&BLACK)
.draw()?;
// Error comparison plot
let root = BitMapBackend::new("dae_comparison_errors.png", (800, 400)).into_drawing_area();
root.fill(&WHITE)?;
let min_error = solution_errors.iter().fold(f64::INFINITY, |a, &b| a.min(b)) / 10.0;
let max_error = solution_errors.iter().fold(0.0, |a, &b| a.max(b)) * 10.0;
let mut chart = ChartBuilder::on(&root)
.caption("Error Comparison", ("sans-serif", 30))
.margin(10)
.x_label_area_size(40)
.y_label_area_size(50)
.build_cartesian_2d(0..solver_methods.len(), min_error..max_error)?;
chart
.configure_mesh()
.disable_x_mesh()
.y_desc("Max Error (log scale)")
.y_labels(10)
.label_style(("sans-serif", 15))
.y_scale(ScaleTransform::Logarithmic(10.0))
.draw()?;
chart.draw_series(ColumnSeries::new(
(0..solver_methods.len()).map(|i| (i, solution_errors[i])),
20,
&BLUE.mix(0.6),
))?;
// Add method names to x-axis
for (i, method) in solver_methods.iter().enumerate() {
chart.draw_series(vec![Text::new(
method.clone(),
(i, min_error),
("sans-serif", 15).into_font().color(&BLACK),
)])?;
}
*/
// println!("\nComparison plots saved as:");
// println!(" dae_comparison_trajectory.png");
// println!(" dae_comparison_errors.png");
Ok(())
}
/// Calculate the analytical solution for the pendulum
#[allow(dead_code)]
fn compute_analytical_solution(g: f64, length: f64, theta0: f64, times: &[f64]) -> Vec<(f64, f64)> {
// For small oscillations, the solution is approximately:
// theta(t) = theta0 * cos(omega * t)
// where omega = sqrt(g/L)
let omega = (g / length).sqrt();
times
.iter()
.map(|&t| {
let theta = theta0 * (omega * t).cos();
let x = length * theta.sin();
let y = -length * theta.cos();
(x, y)
})
.collect()
}
/// Compute error metrics for a DAE solution
#[allow(dead_code)]
fn compute_error_metrics<F>(
result: &scirs2_integrate::DAEResult<f64>,
g: f64,
length: f64,
theta0: f64,
g_constraint: F,
) -> (f64, f64)
where
F: Fn(f64, ArrayView1<f64>, ArrayView1<f64>) -> Array1<f64>,
{
let omega = (g / length).sqrt();
let mut max_error = 0.0;
let mut max_violation = 0.0;
for i in 0..result.t.len() {
let t = result.t[i];
let x = result.x[i][0];
let y = result.x[i][1];
// Calculate analytical solution at this time
let theta_analytical = theta0 * (omega * t).cos();
let x_analytical = length * theta_analytical.sin();
let y_analytical = -length * theta_analytical.cos();
// Error is the Euclidean distance between numerical and analytical solution
let error_at_t = ((x - x_analytical).powi(2) + (y - y_analytical).powi(2)).sqrt();
max_error = max_error.max(error_at_t);
// Constraint violation from the solver's perspective
let violation = g_constraint(t, result.x[i].view(), result.y[i].view())[0].abs();
max_violation = max_violation.max(violation);
}
(max_error, max_violation)
}