rucc_codegen/split.rs
1//! Splitting critical edges, so that every edge that carries values has somewhere to put them.
2//!
3//! Design: `spec/10-backend.md` section 10.4.
4//!
5//! An edge carries values when the block it goes to takes parameters, and giving a parameter its
6//! value is a move. The move has to happen on the edge and not before it or after it, because
7//! before it is a block that goes somewhere else too and after it is a block that is arrived at
8//! from somewhere else too, and in either case the move would run on a path it was not written
9//! for. An edge out of a block with one successor can put its moves at the end of that block,
10//! since every path through it takes the edge. An edge into a block with one predecessor can put
11//! them at the start of that block, for the same reason the other way round. An edge that is
12//! neither, which is what a critical edge is, has neither place, and the allocator says so:
13//! `rucc_regalloc` asserts that it never sees one.
14//!
15//! So one is turned into two. A block with nothing in it goes on the edge, the arguments move on
16//! to the second half, and both halves are now uncritical: the first goes to a block with one
17//! predecessor and the second leaves a block with one successor. Which of the two the moves end
18//! up in is the allocator's answer and not this one's, and either is correct.
19//!
20//! # What it leaves behind
21//!
22//! An empty block, which is a jump to the next thing unless the layout puts it where it falls
23//! through. That is a cost, and it is why an edge with nothing to carry is left alone: there are
24//! no moves to find a place for, so splitting it would buy a jump and nothing else.
25//!
26//! # The other edge with nowhere to put a move
27//!
28//! A computed `goto` leaves its block through a register, and the moves an edge out of it carries
29//! would have to be written somewhere the jump has already gone past. So there is a second pass
30//! here, [`indirect`], which takes the values off those edges and puts them in a block of their
31//! own in front of each label. It runs first, and what it leaves behind is edges the splitting
32//! below then has nothing to do about.
33//!
34//! [`pads`] is here for the same reason and not for a reason of its own: the blocks those labels
35//! begin at are addresses an indirect branch arrives at, and a machine that checks the forward edge
36//! wants a landing pad at every one of them. Which block an address names is settled by the pass
37//! above, so the pad is written after it and not where the prologue's own pad is written.
38
39use std::collections::HashMap;
40
41use rucc_base::Interner;
42use rucc_mir as mir;
43use rucc_target::{BranchInsts, FrameInsts, RegClass};
44
45/// Splits every critical edge that carries values, and gives back how many it split.
46///
47/// Run after lowering and before allocation. Running it twice is running it once, because the
48/// blocks it adds have one successor each and are never the source of a critical edge.
49pub fn critical(func: &mut mir::Func) -> usize {
50 let preds = preds(func);
51 let blocks: Vec<mir::Block> = func.blocks().collect();
52 let mut split = 0;
53 for block in blocks {
54 if func[block].succs.len() < 2 {
55 continue;
56 }
57 for index in 0..func[block].succs.len() {
58 let call = func[block].succs[index].clone();
59 if call.args.is_empty() || preds[call.block.index()] < 2 {
60 continue;
61 }
62 // The new block is at the end of the layout, which is where a block that is a jump
63 // and nothing else does the least harm before the layout pass has an opinion.
64 //
65 // It runs exactly as often as the edge it sits on is taken, and both halves of that
66 // edge are now that edge, which is why the weight is copied onto all three rather
67 // than left at what a block nobody told anything runs. A block on a cold edge that
68 // claimed to run once per call would be one the layout put in the middle of the hot
69 // path.
70 let weight = call.weight;
71 let half = func.create_block();
72 func.set_weight(half, weight);
73 *func.succs_mut(half) = vec![call];
74 func.succs_mut(block)[index] = mir::BlockCall::to(half).taken(weight);
75 split += 1;
76 }
77 }
78 split
79}
80
81/// Takes the values off every edge out of a computed `goto`, and gives back how many blocks it
82/// made to hold them.
83///
84/// Run after lowering and before [`critical`], which then sees edges with nothing on them and
85/// leaves them alone. Running it twice is running it once, for the reason the splitting above is:
86/// the blocks it adds end in a jump rather than in a branch through a register.
87///
88/// # What is wrong with the edge it takes the values off
89///
90/// Every other edge in the function is out of a block whose last instruction the layout writes, so
91/// an edge that is the only way out of its block can put its moves at the end of that block and
92/// they land in front of the jump. A block that leaves through a register already ends in the jump
93/// when the allocator runs, because where it goes is a value and a value is something selection
94/// reads rather than something the layout knows. Moves at the end of that block would be written
95/// after the jump, where nothing runs them, and moves in front of it would be written across the
96/// register the jump reads, which the allocator believes is dead from the jump onwards and is free
97/// to hand to one of the moves.
98///
99/// So the moves go somewhere else. Each label an indirect branch reaches gets a block in front of
100/// it that carries the values, the branch goes to that block with nothing on the edge, and the
101/// address the `&&label` produces is the address of that block rather than of the label's own. The
102/// new block is arrived at one way and leaves one way, so its own edge has both of the places the
103/// splitting above talks about and the allocator is content.
104///
105/// # One label, one address, and two branches that disagree
106///
107/// A label has one address, so two computed `goto`s that reach it both arrive at whatever block
108/// that address names, and the values they carry are not the same values. One block in front of
109/// the label cannot move two different sets of registers.
110///
111/// So they are made to agree first. Each parameter of the label gets a register of its own, every
112/// branch writes that register in front of its jump, and the block in front of the label carries
113/// those registers and nothing else. That is what gcc does about the same problem, which it calls
114/// coalescing across an abnormal edge, done here rather than while the values are still the
115/// optimizer's.
116///
117/// Writing them in front of the jump is safe, which is not obvious, since a branch that goes five
118/// ways writes the registers of one of those ways on the path to all five. What makes it safe is
119/// that nothing reads those registers except the block in front of the label, and the only way to
120/// reach that block is an edge out of a branch, which writes them on the way. So a value written
121/// here and not used is a value overwritten before anything looks, whichever way the jump went.
122///
123/// # One register for one value, and not one for every place it is given to
124///
125/// That safety is also what makes the cost of it worth watching. A branch writes the registers of
126/// every label it can reach, so a register for every parameter of every label is a whole table's
127/// worth of moves in front of every jump in the function, and a dispatch table is a branch that
128/// reaches hundreds of labels. An interpreter hands each of them whatever its loop had in hand at
129/// the jump, which is the same few values over and over, so a register for each place one of them
130/// lands means those values written a hundred times over before every instruction the interpreter
131/// runs. That is not a small constant. It is what makes an interpreter built this way ten times
132/// slower than the same interpreter built with a `switch` instead of the computed `goto`.
133///
134/// So the register belongs to the value rather than to the place. Two parameters are given one
135/// register when they are drawn from the same class and every branch in the function gives them
136/// the same register, which is exactly when one register can stand for both, and a branch writes
137/// each register it has to write once however many labels asked for it. A dispatch table where
138/// every label wants the instruction pointer writes the instruction pointer once. A label
139/// something else reaches, or a label given something no other label is given, keeps a register of
140/// its own, and a branch that gives one label nothing shares nothing with it, since a register
141/// that branch never wrote is not one the label can be given.
142///
143/// # Panics
144///
145/// Panics on a class of register the machine named no move for, which is a function carrying a
146/// value of a kind the target never said how to copy, and on a branch that has lost the terminator
147/// it was found by, which nothing between the finding and the use of it can do. Both are a target
148/// description or a function that was built wrongly, and both are worth finding here rather than as
149/// a value that arrives somewhere it was never written.
150pub fn indirect(
151 func: &mut mir::Func,
152 branch: &BranchInsts,
153 frame: &FrameInsts,
154 names: &mut Interner,
155) -> usize {
156 let jump = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern(&format!("{}{}", branch.prefix, branch.indirect)));
157 let branches: Vec<mir::Block> = func
158 .blocks()
159 .filter(|&block| func.terminator(block).is_some_and(|last| func[last].opcode == jump))
160 .collect();
161 // Nothing at all in almost every function, and the walk at the bottom is over every instruction
162 // in it, so the answer is arrived at here rather than paid for everywhere.
163 if branches.is_empty() {
164 return 0;
165 }
166 // In the order the branches name them rather than in whatever order a hash gives, so that two
167 // runs of the compiler over one program write the same blocks.
168 let mut targets: Vec<mir::Block> = Vec::new();
169 for &block in &branches {
170 for call in &func[block].succs {
171 if !call.args.is_empty() && !targets.contains(&call.block) {
172 targets.push(call.block);
173 }
174 }
175 }
176
177 // One register per thing a branch has to give, rather than one per place it is given to. The
178 // key is what every branch gives that parameter, so two parameters given the same register by
179 // the same branches are given it in one register and a branch writes that register once.
180 let mut homes: HashMap<Given, mir::Reg> = HashMap::new();
181 // What each branch writes in front of its jump, in the order it was first asked for, and never
182 // the same register twice. Two parameters that share a register are given it by the one move.
183 let mut writes: Vec<Vec<(mir::Reg, mir::Reg, RegClass)>> = vec![Vec::new(); branches.len()];
184 let mut entries: HashMap<mir::Block, mir::Block> = HashMap::new();
185
186 for target in targets {
187 let params = func[target].params.clone();
188 let given = given(func, &branches, target);
189 let mut carried: Vec<mir::Reg> = Vec::new();
190 for (index, param) in params.iter().enumerate() {
191 let key: Given = (
192 param.class,
193 given.iter().map(|edges| edges.iter().map(|args| args[index]).collect()).collect(),
194 );
195 let home = match homes.get(&key) {
196 Some(&home) => home,
197 None => {
198 // As narrow as the widest thing it is given, since what it holds is one of
199 // them, and the whole register when any of them is.
200 let widths = key.1.iter().flatten().map(|&arg| func.width(arg));
201 let width =
202 widths.collect::<Option<Vec<u8>>>().and_then(|all| all.into_iter().max());
203 let home = func.new_vreg(param.class);
204 func.set_width(home, width.map_or(0, u32::from));
205 homes.insert(key, home);
206 home
207 }
208 };
209 carried.push(home);
210 for (branch, edges) in given.iter().enumerate() {
211 for args in edges {
212 if !writes[branch].iter().any(|&(written, _, _)| written == home) {
213 writes[branch].push((home, args[index], param.class));
214 }
215 }
216 }
217 }
218 let entry = func.create_block();
219 let mut total = mir::Weight::NEVER;
220 for &block in &branches {
221 for index in 0..func[block].succs.len() {
222 if func[block].succs[index].block != target {
223 continue;
224 }
225 // The block in front of the label runs as often as every branch that reaches it,
226 // which is the same sum the weight of a block with that many edges into it would
227 // be.
228 let weight = func[block].succs[index].weight;
229 total = mir::Weight::parts(total.raw().saturating_add(weight.raw()));
230 func.succs_mut(block)[index] = mir::BlockCall::to(entry).taken(weight);
231 }
232 }
233 func.set_weight(entry, total);
234 *func.succs_mut(entry) = vec![mir::BlockCall::with(target, carried).taken(total)];
235 entries.insert(target, entry);
236 }
237
238 // And the moves themselves, once every label has asked for what it wants, since what one label
239 // asks for is what another may already have asked the same branch for.
240 for (branch, moves) in branches.iter().zip(&writes) {
241 let last = func.terminator(*branch).expect("a block that ends in a jump");
242 for &(home, arg, class) in moves {
243 let name = frame.moves(class).expect("a class this machine can move").mov;
244 let opcode = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern(&format!("{}{name}", frame.prefix)));
245 let inst = func.build_loose(opcode).def(home, class).uses(arg, class).finish();
246 func.insert_before(last, inst);
247 }
248 }
249
250 // And the addresses, which is the half of this that is not about edges. Every `&&label` in the
251 // function names a block, and a label with a block in front of it now begins at that block, so
252 // an address left pointing at the label's own block would be a jump past the moves.
253 let mut addresses: Vec<mir::MemRef> = Vec::new();
254 for block in func.blocks() {
255 for inst in func.insts(block) {
256 if let Some(mem) = func[inst].mem {
257 addresses.push(mem);
258 }
259 }
260 }
261 for mem in addresses {
262 if let Some(named) = func[mem].block {
263 if let Some(&entry) = entries.get(&named) {
264 func[mem].block = Some(entry);
265 }
266 }
267 }
268 // And the names, for the same reason. A block an image points at is one a `goto *p` arrives at,
269 // so a name left on the label's own block would be an address in a table that skips the moves,
270 // which is the one way into the block that would not have made them.
271 for (block, _) in &mut func.labels {
272 if let Some(&entry) = entries.get(block) {
273 *block = entry;
274 }
275 }
276 entries.len()
277}
278
279/// Puts a landing pad at the front of every block whose address is taken, and gives back how many
280/// it wrote.
281///
282/// Run after [`indirect`], because the block an address names is not settled until that has moved
283/// the addresses on to the blocks it made, and only when the command line asked for the forward
284/// edge to be checked. Nothing is written otherwise, which is why the name comes in as an option
285/// and why a target with no such instruction is a target this does nothing on.
286///
287/// The pad a prologue opens with is written elsewhere, in `crate::finish`, because the address it
288/// makes reachable is the address of the function rather than a place inside it. These are the
289/// other addresses an indirect branch may arrive at, and a machine that checks the forward edge
290/// faults on one that has no pad, so a computed `goto` compiled without this would be a program
291/// that ran everywhere except on the hardware the flag was turned on for.
292pub fn pads(
293 func: &mut mir::Func,
294 frame: &FrameInsts,
295 landing: Option<&'static str>,
296 names: &mut Interner,
297) -> usize {
298 let Some(name) = landing else { return 0 };
299 let opcode = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern(&format!("{}{name}", frame.prefix)));
300 let mut addressed: Vec<mir::Block> = Vec::new();
301 for block in func.blocks() {
302 for inst in func.insts(block) {
303 if let Some(mem) = func[inst].mem {
304 if let Some(named) = func[mem].block {
305 if !addressed.contains(&named) {
306 addressed.push(named);
307 }
308 }
309 }
310 }
311 }
312 // And every arm of a jump table, which an indirect jump arrives at the same way.
313 for table in &func.tables {
314 let Some(jump) = func.block_of(table.jump) else { continue };
315 for &cell in &table.cells {
316 let named = func[jump].succs[cell as usize].block;
317 if !addressed.contains(&named) {
318 addressed.push(named);
319 }
320 }
321 }
322 for &block in &addressed {
323 let inst = func.build_loose(opcode).finish();
324 func.prepend_inst(block, inst);
325 }
326 addressed.len()
327}
328
329/// What decides whether two parameters can be given their value in one register: the class the
330/// parameter is drawn from, and the register every branch in the function gives it, in the order
331/// the branches are in and with one entry per edge inside that. A branch that does not reach the
332/// label gives nothing, which is a length of zero and is as much a part of the answer as a
333/// register is, since sharing with a parameter a branch never gives anything to would be reading a
334/// register that branch never wrote.
335type Given = (RegClass, Vec<Vec<mir::Reg>>);
336
337/// What each branch gives that label, edge by edge.
338///
339/// One entry per branch and in the branches' own order, since a label two branches reach and a
340/// label one branch reaches twice are not given the same thing. A branch is allowed to reach one
341/// label twice, which a table with the same label in two of its cells is, so what a branch gives
342/// is a list of what it gives rather than one set of registers.
343fn given(func: &mir::Func, branches: &[mir::Block], target: mir::Block) -> Vec<Vec<Vec<mir::Reg>>> {
344 branches
345 .iter()
346 .map(|&block| {
347 func[block]
348 .succs
349 .iter()
350 .filter(|call| call.block == target)
351 .map(|call| call.args.clone())
352 .collect()
353 })
354 .collect()
355}
356
357/// How many edges arrive at each block, counted by index rather than in layout order so that a
358/// block added while splitting can be looked up in the same table.
359fn preds(func: &mir::Func) -> Vec<usize> {
360 let mut counts = vec![0; func.block_count()];
361 for block in func.blocks() {
362 for call in &func[block].succs {
363 counts[call.block.index()] += 1;
364 }
365 }
366 counts
367}
368
369#[cfg(test)]
370mod tests {
371 use rucc_base::Interner;
372 use rucc_target::x86_64::{BRANCH, FRAME, GPR, REGS};
373
374 use super::*;
375
376 /// A diamond: one block that goes two ways and one block both ways arrive at, with as many
377 /// parameters on the block they arrive at as the test asks for.
378 fn diamond(params: usize) -> (Interner, mir::Func, [mir::Block; 4]) {
379 let mut names = Interner::new();
380 let mut func = mir::Func::new(names.intern("f"));
381 let head = func.create_block();
382 let left = func.create_block();
383 let right = func.create_block();
384 let join = func.create_block();
385 // The values arrive in the head, so that they have somewhere to be defined and the
386 // printer has a name for them. Nothing here runs an allocator, which is the one thing
387 // that would object to a first block with parameters.
388 let args: Vec<mir::Reg> = (0..params).map(|_| func.append_param(head, GPR)).collect();
389 for _ in 0..params {
390 func.append_param(join, GPR);
391 }
392 *func.succs_mut(head) = vec![mir::BlockCall::to(left), mir::BlockCall::to(right)];
393 *func.succs_mut(left) = vec![mir::BlockCall::with(join, args.clone())];
394 *func.succs_mut(right) = vec![mir::BlockCall::with(join, args)];
395 (names, func, [head, left, right, join])
396 }
397
398 /// Where each block goes, which is the whole of what this changes.
399 fn edges(func: &mir::Func) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
400 func.blocks()
401 .map(|block| func[block].succs.iter().map(|call| call.block.index()).collect())
402 .collect()
403 }
404
405 #[test]
406 fn an_edge_that_is_the_only_way_out_is_left_alone() {
407 let (_, mut func, _) = diamond(1);
408 // The two edges into the join carry a value each and neither is critical, because the
409 // block each leaves goes nowhere else.
410 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 0);
411 assert_eq!(edges(&func), vec![vec![1, 2], vec![3], vec![3], vec![]]);
412 }
413
414 #[test]
415 fn a_critical_edge_carrying_a_value_is_split_in_two() {
416 let (_, mut func, [head, _, _, join]) = diamond(1);
417 // Now the head goes straight to the join as well, so both of its arms are critical: it
418 // has two ways out and the join has three ways in.
419 let arg = func.append_param(head, GPR);
420 func.succs_mut(head).push(mir::BlockCall::with(join, vec![arg]));
421 func.succs_mut(head).swap(1, 2);
422
423 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 1);
424 assert_eq!(
425 edges(&func),
426 // The head's second arm is the new block and the new block goes to the join. The
427 // other two arms are untouched, because each goes to a block with one way in.
428 vec![vec![1, 4, 2], vec![3], vec![3], vec![], vec![3]]
429 );
430 }
431
432 #[test]
433 fn a_critical_edge_carrying_nothing_is_left_alone() {
434 let (_, mut func, [head, _, _, join]) = diamond(0);
435 func.succs_mut(head).push(mir::BlockCall::to(join));
436
437 // Critical and not split, because there is no move to find a place for and a block that
438 // is a jump and nothing else is worth more than nothing.
439 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 0);
440 }
441
442 #[test]
443 fn the_arguments_move_on_to_the_half_that_arrives() {
444 let (names, mut func, [head, _, _, join]) = diamond(1);
445 let arg = func.append_param(head, GPR);
446 func.succs_mut(head).push(mir::BlockCall::with(join, vec![arg]));
447
448 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 1);
449 // What the first half carries is nothing, since the block it goes to asks for nothing,
450 // and what the second half carries is what the whole edge used to.
451 let half = func.blocks().last().expect("the block the split added");
452 assert_eq!(func[head].succs[2].args, Vec::new());
453 assert_eq!(func[half].succs[0].args, vec![arg]);
454 assert_eq!(
455 mir::print_func(&func, &names, ®S),
456 "mfunc @f {\nblock0(%0:gpr, %1:gpr):\n block1, block2, block4\n\n\
457 block1:\n block3(%0)\n\nblock2:\n block3(%0)\n\n\
458 block3(%2:gpr):\n\nblock4:\n block3(%1)\n}\n"
459 );
460 }
461
462 #[test]
463 fn splitting_twice_is_splitting_once() {
464 let (_, mut func, [head, _, _, join]) = diamond(1);
465 let arg = func.append_param(head, GPR);
466 func.succs_mut(head).push(mir::BlockCall::with(join, vec![arg]));
467
468 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 1);
469 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 0);
470 }
471
472 /// A function with one label whose address is taken and as many blocks leaving through that
473 /// address as the test asks for, each carrying as many values to the label as it asks for.
474 fn computed(branches: usize, params: usize) -> (Interner, mir::Func) {
475 let mut names = Interner::new();
476 let mut func = mir::Func::new(names.intern("f"));
477 let head = func.create_block();
478 let label = func.create_block();
479 for _ in 0..params {
480 func.append_param(label, GPR);
481 }
482 let lea = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern("x64.lea_64"));
483 let jump = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern("x64.jmp_reg"));
484 for _ in 0..branches {
485 // Every branch works the address out for itself, which is what a program that takes
486 // the address of a label twice looks like once the values are in registers.
487 let args: Vec<mir::Reg> = (0..params).map(|_| func.append_param(head, GPR)).collect();
488 let address = func.new_vreg(GPR);
489 let at = if branches == 1 { head } else { func.create_block() };
490 func.build(at, lea).def(address, GPR).mem(mir::Mem::block(label)).finish();
491 func.build(at, jump).operand(mir::Operand::read(address, GPR)).finish();
492 *func.succs_mut(at) = vec![mir::BlockCall::with(label, args)];
493 }
494 (names, func)
495 }
496
497 /// Which block each address in the function names, in the order the instructions are in.
498 fn addressed(func: &mir::Func) -> Vec<usize> {
499 func.blocks()
500 .flat_map(|block| func.insts(block).collect::<Vec<_>>())
501 .filter_map(|inst| func[inst].mem)
502 .filter_map(|mem| func[mem].block)
503 .map(mir::Block::index)
504 .collect()
505 }
506
507 #[test]
508 fn the_values_a_computed_goto_carries_move_into_a_block_in_front_of_the_label() {
509 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(1, 1);
510 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 1);
511
512 // The branch goes to the new block carrying nothing, and the new block carries the value
513 // the branch used to. The address the `lea` works out is the new block's as well, since
514 // arriving at the label without going through the new block is arriving without the value.
515 assert_eq!(edges(&func), vec![vec![2], vec![], vec![1]]);
516 assert_eq!(func[mir::Block::new(0)].succs[0].args, Vec::new());
517 assert_eq!(addressed(&func), vec![2]);
518 }
519
520 #[test]
521 fn two_computed_gotos_that_reach_one_label_are_made_to_agree() {
522 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(2, 1);
523 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 1);
524
525 // One block in front of the label and not two, because the label has one address and both
526 // branches arrive at it. What makes that sound is the move each branch writes in front of
527 // its own jump, which puts its value in the register that block carries.
528 assert_eq!(edges(&func), vec![vec![], vec![], vec![4], vec![4], vec![1]]);
529 let text = mir::print_func(&func, &names, ®S);
530 assert_eq!(text.matches("x64.mov_rr_64").count(), 2, "{text}");
531 // In front of the jump rather than behind it, since nothing behind a jump runs.
532 for line in text.lines().collect::<Vec<_>>().windows(2) {
533 if line[1].contains("x64.jmp_reg") {
534 assert!(line[0].contains("x64.mov_rr_64"), "{text}");
535 }
536 }
537 assert_eq!(addressed(&func), vec![4, 4]);
538 }
539
540 /// A function with one computed `goto` that reaches as many labels as the test asks for, each
541 /// given the one value the branch has in hand, which is the shape of a dispatch table.
542 fn table(labels: usize) -> (Interner, mir::Func, Vec<mir::Block>) {
543 let mut names = Interner::new();
544 let mut func = mir::Func::new(names.intern("f"));
545 let head = func.create_block();
546 let arg = func.append_param(head, GPR);
547 let lea = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern("x64.lea_64"));
548 let jump = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern("x64.jmp_reg"));
549 let mut targets = Vec::new();
550 for _ in 0..labels {
551 let label = func.create_block();
552 func.append_param(label, GPR);
553 targets.push(label);
554 func.succs_mut(head).push(mir::BlockCall::with(label, vec![arg]));
555 }
556 let address = func.new_vreg(GPR);
557 func.build(head, lea).def(address, GPR).mem(mir::Mem::block(targets[0])).finish();
558 func.build(head, jump).operand(mir::Operand::read(address, GPR)).finish();
559 (names, func, targets)
560 }
561
562 #[test]
563 fn labels_a_branch_gives_the_same_value_are_given_it_in_one_register() {
564 let (mut names, mut func, _) = table(8);
565 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 8);
566
567 // One move in front of the jump and not eight, because the eight labels are given the one
568 // value and it is now in the one register. Eight blocks were still made, since each label
569 // needs the block that moves that register on to its own parameter.
570 let text = mir::print_func(&func, &names, ®S);
571 assert_eq!(text.matches("x64.mov_rr_64").count(), 1, "{text}");
572 }
573
574 #[test]
575 fn a_label_given_something_else_keeps_a_register_of_its_own() {
576 let (mut names, mut func, targets) = table(8);
577 let head = mir::Block::new(0);
578 let other = func.append_param(head, GPR);
579 let last = func[head].succs.len() - 1;
580 func.succs_mut(head)[last] = mir::BlockCall::with(targets[7], vec![other]);
581
582 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 8);
583 // Two moves: one register for the seven labels given the same value, and one for the label
584 // given the other. Sharing is about what a label is given and not about how many there are.
585 let text = mir::print_func(&func, &names, ®S);
586 assert_eq!(text.matches("x64.mov_rr_64").count(), 2, "{text}");
587 }
588
589 #[test]
590 fn labels_that_take_different_numbers_of_values_still_share_the_ones_they_agree_on() {
591 let (mut names, mut func, targets) = table(8);
592 let head = mir::Block::new(0);
593 let arg = func[head].params[0].reg;
594 let other = func.append_param(head, GPR);
595 // The last label takes a second value, which is what an interpreter looks like: each of
596 // its labels uses what it needs and no two of them need quite the same list.
597 func.append_param(targets[7], GPR);
598 let last = func[head].succs.len() - 1;
599 func.succs_mut(head)[last] = mir::BlockCall::with(targets[7], vec![arg, other]);
600
601 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 8);
602 // Two moves, not nine. The first parameter of the long label is given what the other seven
603 // are given, so it takes the same register, and only the value nothing else is given needs
604 // one of its own.
605 let text = mir::print_func(&func, &names, ®S);
606 assert_eq!(text.matches("x64.mov_rr_64").count(), 2, "{text}");
607 }
608
609 #[test]
610 fn an_edge_out_of_a_computed_goto_that_carries_nothing_is_left_alone() {
611 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(1, 0);
612
613 // No values to carry, so no block to carry them, and the address stays the label's own.
614 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 0);
615 assert_eq!(addressed(&func), vec![1]);
616 }
617
618 #[test]
619 fn a_function_with_no_computed_goto_in_it_is_left_alone() {
620 let (mut names, mut func, _) = diamond(1);
621 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 0);
622 assert_eq!(edges(&func), vec![vec![1, 2], vec![3], vec![3], vec![]]);
623 }
624
625 #[test]
626 fn what_it_leaves_is_nothing_for_the_splitting_below_to_do() {
627 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(2, 1);
628 indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names);
629 // The edges out of the branches carry nothing now, and the edges out of the blocks it
630 // added are the only way out of those blocks, so neither kind is critical.
631 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 0);
632 }
633
634 /// The first instruction of each block, by opcode, and an empty string for a block with
635 /// nothing in it.
636 fn opens(func: &mir::Func, names: &Interner) -> Vec<String> {
637 func.blocks()
638 .map(|block| match func.insts(block).next() {
639 Some(inst) => names.resolve(func[inst].opcode.name()).to_owned(),
640 None => String::new(),
641 })
642 .collect()
643 }
644
645 #[test]
646 fn the_block_a_label_begins_at_gets_a_landing_pad_when_the_forward_edge_is_checked() {
647 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(2, 1);
648 indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names);
649
650 // One pad, at the block in front of the label, because that is the block both addresses
651 // name once the values have been moved on to it. The label's own block is arrived at by an
652 // ordinary edge from there and wants nothing.
653 assert_eq!(pads(&mut func, &FRAME, FRAME.landing, &mut names), 1);
654 assert_eq!(opens(&func, &names), ["", "", "x64.lea_64", "x64.lea_64", "x64.endbr64"]);
655 }
656
657 #[test]
658 fn a_label_with_no_block_in_front_of_it_gets_the_pad_itself() {
659 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(1, 0);
660 indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names);
661
662 // Nothing was moved on to anything, so the address still names the label and the pad goes
663 // where the address goes.
664 assert_eq!(pads(&mut func, &FRAME, FRAME.landing, &mut names), 1);
665 assert_eq!(opens(&func, &names), ["x64.lea_64", "x64.endbr64"]);
666 }
667
668 #[test]
669 fn nothing_is_written_when_the_forward_edge_is_not_checked() {
670 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(1, 0);
671 assert_eq!(pads(&mut func, &FRAME, None, &mut names), 0);
672 assert_eq!(opens(&func, &names), ["x64.lea_64", ""]);
673 }
674}