ripvec
Cacheless semantic code + document search that ties or beats transformer baselines. One binary, 19 grammars, three retrieval engines, zero setup.
ripvec finds code and documents by meaning, provides structural code intelligence across every language it knows, and ranks results by how important each file is in your project. The default engine runs CPU-only, holds no on-disk index, and matches or exceeds ModernBERT-class transformers on our benchmark matrix across code and prose. Transformer engines remain available, opt-in, for users who want a persistent index and the best coherent top-K on long-form narrative.
)
The function is called with_retry, the variable is delay. "exponential backoff" appears nowhere in the source. grep can't find this. ripvec can, because it embeds both your query and the code into the same vector space, fuses semantic scores with path-enriched BM25, layers a structural-importance signal from a PageRank percentile boost, and reranks the top candidates through a cross-encoder.
When to use what
ripvec has three interfaces. Here's when each one matters:
| Interface | When to use it | Who uses it |
|---|---|---|
CLI (ripvec "query" .) |
Terminal search, interactive TUI, one-shot queries | You, directly |
MCP server (ripvec-mcp) |
AI agent needs to search or understand your codebase | Claude Code, Cursor, any MCP client |
LSP server (ripvec-mcp --lsp) |
Editor/agent needs symbols, definitions, diagnostics | Claude Code's LSP tool, editors |
The MCP server gives AI agents 8 semantic + structural tools plus 9 LSP tools. The LSP server gives editors structural intelligence (outlines, go-to-definition, syntax diagnostics) for all 19 languages from one binary. The CLI is for humans. Same binary for all three.
If you're using Claude Code, install the plugin. It sets up both MCP and LSP automatically; Claude will use search_code when you ask conceptual questions and the LSP for symbol navigation.
Engines
Three retrieval engines share the same CLI/MCP/LSP surface. Pick at runtime with --model:
graph TB
Q["Query"] --> S["Shared surface<br/>CLI / MCP / LSP"]
S --> R["--model ripvec<br/>(default)"]
S --> M["--model modernbert"]
S --> B["--model bert"]
R --> RP["Model2Vec 32M bi-encoder<br/>+ path-enriched BM25<br/>+ PageRank percentile boost<br/>+ MiniLM-L-12 cross-encoder rerank (prose only)<br/>= in-memory only"]
M --> MP["ModernBERT 768-dim transformer<br/>+ BM25 + PageRank<br/>= persistent on-disk index"]
B --> BP["BGE-small 384-dim transformer<br/>+ BM25 + PageRank<br/>= persistent on-disk index"]
| Engine | Pipeline | Cache | When to pick |
|---|---|---|---|
ripvec (default) |
Model2Vec 32M + path-enriched BM25 + PageRank, with L-12 cross-encoder rerank auto-gated to prose corpora | none (in-memory per session) | Default. Sub-MCPs, fresh worktrees, fan-out agents, document archives, anywhere first-query latency matters. |
modernbert |
ModernBERT 768d transformer + BM25 + PageRank | ~/.cache/ripvec/ or .ripvec/cache/ |
Workstation with a persistent index. Best coherent top-10 on long-form narrative prose. GPU-capable (Metal/MLX/CUDA). |
bert |
BGE-small 384d transformer + BM25 + PageRank | ~/.cache/ripvec/ or .ripvec/cache/ |
Lighter transformer alternative. Untested in our 1.0 benchmark matrix; likely worse than ModernBERT, lower memory footprint. |
The MCP daemon picks the engine at startup via RIPVEC_MCP_ENGINE (defaults to ripvec); the transformer engines require building ripvec-mcp with --features legacy-transformer-mcp. The CLI accepts --model per-invocation with no build-time gating.
Quality
Two reproducible benchmarks pin the engine's behavior: a same-corpus replay of MinishLab's semble Python suite (167 queries across 8 popular Python libraries) and a 15-query natural-language sweep across 10 Project Gutenberg books. Both ship as cargo run --release --example semble_bench.
The Tokio result from the v1.2 README is worth carrying forward: under ModernBERT, 7/10 dev-flavored queries put test files in top-5 ahead of canonical implementations. The ripvec engine's PageRank percentile boost flips that — implementations rank above the tests that reference them, because tests have near-zero structural PageRank and implementations don't. PageRank stays in the ripvec engine for exactly this reason; semble's pipeline does not have it.
Replaying the semble benchmark
semble ships a 1,251-query NDCG@10 benchmark across 63 repositories in 19 languages. The tables below replay the 8 Python repos (167 queries) and a 15-query prose set across 10 Project Gutenberg books, running ripvec via cargo run --example semble_bench against semble's own annotation file format. Both engines share the same static-embedding backbones; the ripvec engine adds path-enriched BM25, PageRank, and (gated) cross-encoder rerank.
Code (8 Python repos, no rerank — potion-code-16M vs potion-base-32M default):
| Repo | semble (16M) | ripvec 16M | ripvec 32M (default) | semble p50 | ripvec 32M p50 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aiohttp | 0.857 | 0.841 | 0.813 | 0.87 ms | 0.85 ms |
| fastapi | 0.811 | 0.775 | 0.783 | 0.77 ms | 1.65 ms |
| flask | 0.865 | 0.854 | 0.826 | 0.64 ms | 0.33 ms |
| httpx | 0.866 | 0.866 | 0.839 | 0.71 ms | 0.28 ms |
| model2vec | 0.672 | 0.658 | 0.656 | 0.65 ms | 0.17 ms |
| pydantic | 0.799 | 0.799 | 0.834 | 0.92 ms | 1.67 ms |
| requests | 0.965 | 0.986 | 0.981 | 0.61 ms | 0.20 ms |
| starlette | 0.943 | 0.934 | 0.946 | 0.76 ms | 0.26 ms |
| avg | 0.847 | 0.839 | 0.835 | 0.74 ms | 0.68 ms |
Prose (10 Gutenberg books, 15 queries — full rerank-on/off matrix):
| Engine + model | no rerank | with rerank |
|---|---|---|
| semble 16M | 0.894 | 0.917 |
| semble 32M | 0.929 | 0.951 |
| ripvec 16M | 0.917 | 0.959 |
| ripvec 32M (default) | 0.975 | 1.000 |
What this says:
- Same-pipeline parity is essentially closed on code. Ripvec 16M lands within 0.008 NDCG@10 of semble across 8 Python repos (two exact matches; one ripvec-wins on requests +0.021). The 32M default trades 0.004 NDCG@10 on code for a 0.058 lift on prose — a clean win when the engine has to pick one model.
- Ripvec hits perfect NDCG@10 on the gutenberg matrix with rerank. The L-12 cross-encoder, properly wired (BERT pooler + raw logits + min-max blend + LongestFirst truncation), lifts 32M prose from 0.975 → 1.000 and 16M prose from 0.917 → 0.959.
- Rerank still hurts code (~-0.094 NDCG@10 average).
ms-marco-MiniLM-L-12-v2is a web-prose model — wrong domain for code chunks regardless of impl quality. The rerank gate is now corpus-aware: at index build time, ripvec classifies the corpus by chunk file mix (Code< 30% prose,Mixed30-70%,Docs≥ 70%) and fires the cross-encoder only onMixed/Docscorpora (and only when the query is NL-shaped). Pure code corpora skip rerank automatically. - Speed: ripvec query p50 is roughly the same order of magnitude as semble (≤2 ms across all configs). Index time is 3.5× faster than semble on average.
The full sweep that informed the 32M-as-default decision spans both corpora, both models, both rerank states — see crates/ripvec-core/examples/semble_bench.rs to reproduce.
Workflow: orient, search, navigate
graph LR
A["🗺️ Orient<br/>get_repo_map"] --> B["🔍 Search<br/>search(scope)"]
B --> C["🧭 Navigate<br/>LSP operations"]
C -->|"need more context"| B
C -->|"found it"| D["✏️ Edit"]
Orient. get_repo_map returns a structural overview ranked by function-level importance. One tool call replaces 10+ sequential file reads. Start here when working on unfamiliar code.
Search. search(query="authentication middleware", scope="code") finds implementations by meaning across all 19 languages simultaneously. Pass scope="docs" for documentation-only retrieval (with cross-encoder rerank), scope="all" (default) to search everything and let the corpus class decide whether rerank fires. Results are ranked by relevance and structural importance.
Navigate. LSP documentSymbol shows the file outline. goToDefinition jumps to the likely definition. findReferences shows usage sites. incomingCalls/outgoingCalls traces the call graph.
Semantic search
You describe behavior, ripvec finds the implementation:
| What you want | grep / ripgrep | ripvec |
|---|---|---|
| "retry with backoff" | Nothing (code says delay *= 2) |
Finds the retry handler |
| "database connection pool" | Comments mentioning "pool" | The pool implementation |
| "authentication middleware" | // TODO: add auth |
The auth guard |
| "WebSocket lifecycle" | String "WebSocket" | Connect/disconnect handlers |
Search modes: --mode hybrid (default, semantic + BM25 fusion), --mode semantic (pure vector similarity), --mode keyword (pure BM25). Hybrid is usually best.
Scope: code, docs, or all
Documents about a topic — READMEs, design specs, RFCs, code comments — literally use the topic's words. Code that implements the topic usually doesn't. So semantic similarity systematically ranks docs above implementations on descriptive queries, and the right answer depends on what the agent is looking for.
scope lets the caller declare intent:
| Scope | Includes | Rerank | When to pick |
|---|---|---|---|
code |
code-language extensions (.py, .rs, .ts, .go, …) |
off | "Find the implementation of X." |
docs |
prose extensions (.md, .rst, .txt, .adoc, .org, .mdx) |
on (NL queries) | "Find documentation about X / how X is described." |
all (default) |
everything | corpus-aware | "I don't know yet — let me search everything." |
include_extensions and exclude_extensions give surgical control on top of scope (e.g. scope=all, exclude_extensions=["min.js"]). Same flags on CLI: --scope, --include-ext, --exclude-ext.
The MCP search tool exposes these as JSON params; the CLI exposes them as flags.
Multi-language LSP
ripvec serves LSP from a single binary for all 19 grammars. No per-language server installs. It provides:
documentSymbol: file outline (functions, fields, enum variants, constants, types, headings)workspaceSymbol: cross-language symbol search with PageRank boostgoToDefinition: name-based resolution ranked by structural importancefindReferences: usage sites via hybrid search + content filteringhover: scope chain, signature, enriched contextpublishDiagnostics: tree-sitter syntax error detection after every editincomingCalls/outgoingCalls: function-level call graph
For languages with dedicated LSPs (Rust, Python, Go, TypeScript), ripvec runs alongside them. The dedicated server handles types, ripvec handles semantic search and cross-language features. For languages without dedicated LSPs (bash, HCL, Ruby, Kotlin, Swift, Scala), ripvec is the primary code intelligence.
JSON, YAML, TOML, and Markdown get structural outlines (keys, mappings, headings) and syntax diagnostics. Useful for navigating large config files, not comparable to language-aware intelligence.
Architecture: the ripvec engine
The default engine is a four-stage composite pipeline. Each stage uses a fast cheap-to-rebuild signal; together they outperform a single transformer on retrieval quality.
graph TB
Q["Query"] --> EMB["Bi-encoder embed<br/>(Model2Vec 32M)"]
Q --> BM["BM25 score<br/>(path-enriched tokenization)"]
EMB --> SEM["Cosine similarity<br/>top-N candidates"]
BM --> LEX["Lexical ranking<br/>top-N candidates"]
SEM --> RRF["Reciprocal Rank Fusion<br/>(k=60)"]
LEX --> RRF
RRF --> PR["× PageRank percentile boost<br/>(sigmoid curve, α=0.5)"]
PR --> GATE{"Top hit is prose?<br/>(md / rst / txt)"}
GATE -->|"yes"| RR["Cross-encoder rerank<br/>(ms-marco-MiniLM-L-12-v2)<br/>top-100 candidates"]
GATE -->|"no (code)"| OUT["Top-k results"]
RR --> OUT
Static bi-encoder retrieval (Model2Vec). The bi-encoder is a lookup-and-mean-pool over a pretrained 256-dim embedding table (minishlab/potion-base-32M). No transformer forward pass; encoding cost is dominated by memory bandwidth, not FLOPs. About 5ms per query on a single CPU thread; ~250K chunks per second when indexing in parallel.
Path-enriched BM25. Lexical scoring with a code-aware tokenizer that splits parseJsonConfig into [parse, json, config] and my_func_name into [my, func, name]. Chunk text is enriched with the file stem (doubled) and the last three directory components before tokenization, so a query like "session encoding" hits both content and sessions.py paths.
Reciprocal Rank Fusion. Combines the semantic and lexical rankings via Cormack et al.'s rank-based fusion (k=60). Handles the scale mismatch between cosine similarity and BM25 without tuning.
PageRank percentile boost. A structural-importance signal on top of relevance. See the next section.
Cross-encoder rerank (prose only). When the top candidate is a prose file (md, rst, txt, adoc, org) and the query isn't symbol-shaped, the top 100 candidates are re-scored by a cross-encoder (ms-marco-MiniLM-L-12-v2) that runs full attention across the concatenated query+document pair. The BERT pooler (tanh(W_pool · cls)) is applied between the trunk and the classifier — matching the head the model was trained against. Raw classifier logits are returned (sentence-transformers Identity activation); the rerank layer min-max normalizes both cross-encoder and bi-encoder score arrays within the candidate set before convex-combining (0.7 × cross + 0.3 × bi). Tokenizer truncation is LongestFirst against the model's max_position_embeddings, preserving [CLS] / [SEP] on long inputs. With those pieces wired correctly, rerank lifts the 10-book Gutenberg benchmark from 0.975 → 1.000 NDCG@10 on the default 32M model and 0.917 → 0.959 on 16M.
Code corpora skip the reranker. The ms-marco-MiniLM-L-12-v2 checkpoint is trained on web prose; on the same-corpus replay of 8 popular Python libraries it loses ~0.094 NDCG@10 on average even with the impl fully corrected — wrong domain, not wrong wiring. The prose gate keeps the speed win on code and the quality lift on docs.
Function-level PageRank
graph LR
subgraph "Call Graph"
A["main()"] --> B["handle_request()"]
A --> C["init_db()"]
B --> D["authenticate()"]
B --> E["dispatch()"]
D --> F["verify_token()"]
E --> D
end
subgraph "PageRank"
D2["authenticate() ★★★"]
B2["handle_request() ★★"]
E2["dispatch() ★"]
end
ripvec extracts call expressions from every function body using tree-sitter, resolves callee names to definitions, and computes PageRank on the resulting call graph. Functions called by many others rank higher. authenticate() in the example above is more structurally important than dispatch() because more code depends on it.
The bi-encoder is structurally weaker than a transformer. Model2Vec doesn't model cross-token interactions and can't reliably distinguish a 1500-char canonical implementation from a 3-line example stub by dense similarity alone. Without a corrective signal, the engine ranks tests/hello_world.py competitively with src/auth/handler.py on a query like "register a route." PageRank carries the missing signal: implementations are imported by tests and callers; stubs are imported by nothing.
ripvec applies the structural prior as a sigmoid-on-percentile boost: boost(p) = 1 + α × sigmoid((p − 0.5) / s) where p is the file's PR percentile within the corpus, α=0.5 is the ceiling lift, and s=0.15 controls steepness.
| PR percentile | Example file | Boost (α=0.5) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 (not in graph) | isolated leaf file | 1.00× (no boost) |
| 0.10 (bottom decile) | rarely-imported impl | 1.04× |
| 0.25 (lower quartile) | hub of one small module | 1.08× |
| 0.50 (median) | typical impl file | 1.25× |
| 0.75 (upper quartile) | heavily-imported module | 1.42× |
| 0.95 (near top) | central trait / API surface | 1.48× |
| 1.00 (graph root) | e.g. tokio/src/lib.rs |
~1.49× (asymptote 1.5×) |
Two design constraints fall out of this curve:
- At-or-above-median PR gets a meaningfully different boost from low-PR. A median-importance impl with cosine 0.84 ends at 0.84 × 1.25 = 1.05; a near-zero-PR test with cosine 0.85 ends at 0.85 × 1.02 = 0.867. The impl flips above the test by ~21%, enough to reorder reliably when the bi-encoder is uncertain.
- The ceiling caps centers-of-universe. A graph-root file at p=1.0 gets at most 1.5×. It can't dominate when the query genuinely matches a less-central file.
The boost is applied via a composable RankingLayer chain shared across CLI, MCP, and LSP code paths. Adding a new ranking signal (recency, file-saturation diversification) is a single new impl RankingLayer.
Architecture: transformer engines
ripvec retains two transformer engines for users who want a persistent on-disk index and the absolute coherent top-K on long-form prose. Both share the cache architecture, the BM25/RRF/PageRank ranking layers, and the GPU backends; they differ only in the embedding model.
Cache layout
graph TD
subgraph "~/.cache/ripvec/<project_hash>/v3-modernbert/"
M["manifest.json<br/>file entries + Merkle hashes"]
L["manifest.lock<br/>advisory fd-lock"]
subgraph "objects/ (content-addressed)"
O1["ab/cdef12...<br/>(zstd-compressed FileCache)"]
O2["3f/a891bc...<br/>(zstd-compressed FileCache)"]
end
end
Each file's chunks and embeddings are serialized into a FileCache object, compressed with zstd (~8x), and stored by blake3 content hash in a git-style xx/hash sharded object store. The manifest tracks metadata: mtime, size, content hash, chunk count per file, plus Merkle directory hashes.
The ripvec engine never builds any of this. It holds the in-memory index across an MCP session lifetime, drops it on reindex or process exit, and rebuilds on next query.
Change detection: two-level diff
graph TD
F["File on disk"] --> M{"mtime + size<br/>match manifest?"}
M -->|"yes"| SKIP["Unchanged<br/>(fast path, no I/O)"]
M -->|"no"| HASH{"blake3 content hash<br/>matches manifest?"}
HASH -->|"yes"| TOUCH["Touched but identical<br/>(heal mtime in manifest)"]
HASH -->|"no"| DIRTY["Dirty → re-embed"]
Level 1 (mtime+size) is a stat call (microseconds). Level 2 (blake3 hash) reads the file but avoids re-embedding if content hasn't changed. After git clone (where all mtimes are wrong), the first run hashes everything but re-embeds nothing, then heals the manifest mtimes for fast-path on subsequent runs.
Serialization: two formats
| Format | Used for | Portable? |
|---|---|---|
| rkyv (zero-copy) | User-level cache (~/.cache) | No (architecture-dependent) |
| bitcode | Repo-level cache (.ripvec/) | Yes (cross-architecture) |
Auto-detected on read via magic bytes: 0x42 0x43 = bitcode, otherwise rkyv. Both are zstd-compressed. Repo-level indices use bitcode so they can be committed to git and shared between x86 CI and ARM developer machines.
Concurrency and locking
sequenceDiagram
participant MCP as MCP Server
participant Watcher as File Watcher
participant Lock as manifest.lock
participant Cache as Object Store
Note over MCP: Query arrives
MCP->>Lock: acquire read lock
MCP->>Cache: load objects
Lock-->>MCP: release
Note over Watcher: File change detected (2s debounce)
Watcher->>Lock: acquire write lock
Watcher->>Cache: re-embed dirty files
Watcher->>Cache: write new objects
Watcher->>Cache: save manifest + GC
Lock-->>Watcher: release
The file watcher debounces for 2 seconds of quiet before triggering re-indexing. Advisory fd-lock on manifest.lock prevents readers from seeing a half-written manifest. Multiple readers can proceed concurrently; writers block all readers.
Garbage collection runs after each incremental update; unreferenced objects (from deleted or re-embedded files) are removed from the store.
Repo-level indexing
&&
Creates .ripvec/config.toml (pins model + version) and .ripvec/cache/ (manifest + objects). Teammates who clone get instant search. The config is validated on load. If the model doesn't match the runtime model, ripvec falls back to the user-level cache with a warning.
Repo config can also exclude files from the index using .gitignore syntax:
[]
= [
"*.jsonl",
"*.md",
"docs/generated/**",
"!docs/README.md",
]
These patterns apply to CLI indexing, incremental cache diffing, MCP reindexing, and repo-map file discovery. The command-line --exclude-extensions=jsonl,md flag is useful for one-off extension filters.
Cache resolution
graph TD
A["--cache-dir override"] -->|"highest priority"| R["Resolved cache dir"]
B[".ripvec/config.toml<br/>(repo-local)"] -->|"if model matches"| R
C["RIPVEC_CACHE env var"] --> R
D["~/.cache/ripvec/<br/>(XDG default)"] -->|"lowest priority"| R
Embedding pipeline
graph LR
subgraph "Stage 1: Chunk (rayon)"
F["Files"] --> TS["Tree-sitter<br/>parse"]
TS --> C["Semantic<br/>chunks"]
end
subgraph "Stage 2: Tokenize"
C --> T["Tokenizer<br/>(BPE / WordPiece)"]
T --> B["Padded<br/>batches"]
end
subgraph "Stage 3: Embed (GPU)"
B --> FW["Forward pass<br/>(22 layers ModernBERT,<br/>12 layers BGE-small)"]
FW --> P["Mean / CLS pool<br/>+ L2 norm"]
P --> V["Embedding<br/>vectors"]
end
C -.->|"bounded channel<br/>backpressure"| T
T -.->|"bounded channel<br/>backpressure"| FW
For large corpora (1000+ files), stages run concurrently as a streaming pipeline with bounded channels for backpressure. The GPU starts embedding after the first batch (~50ms), not after all files are chunked.
Driver / Architecture split
The core design insight for the transformer engines: the forward pass is written ONCE as a generic ModernBertArch<D: Driver>, and each backend implements the Driver trait with platform-specific operations. Same model, same math, different hardware.
graph TB
subgraph "Architecture (written once)"
FP["ModernBertArch<D: Driver><br/>forward()"]
FP --> L1["Layer 1: Attention + FFN"]
L1 --> L2["Layer 2: Attention + FFN"]
L2 --> LN["...22 layers..."]
LN --> Pool["Mean pool + L2 norm"]
end
subgraph "Driver trait implementations"
FP -.->|"D = Metal"| M["MetalDriver<br/>MPS GEMMs + custom MSL kernels"]
FP -.->|"D = CUDA"| CU["CudaDriver<br/>cuBLAS tensor cores + NVRTC kernels"]
FP -.->|"D = CPU"| CP["CpuDriver<br/>ndarray + Accelerate/OpenBLAS"]
FP -.->|"D = MLX"| ML["MlxDriver<br/>lazy eval → auto-fused Metal"]
end
What each backend actually does per layer
Each of the 22 ModernBERT layers runs attention + FFN. Here's how the same operations map to different hardware:
graph LR
subgraph "Attention"
LN1["LayerNorm"] --> QKV["QKV projection<br/>(GEMM)"]
QKV --> PAD["Pad + Split"]
PAD --> ROPE["RoPE rotation"]
ROPE --> ATTN["Q @ K^T<br/>(batched GEMM)"]
ATTN --> SM["Scale + Mask<br/>+ Softmax"]
SM --> AV["Scores @ V<br/>(batched GEMM)"]
AV --> UNPAD["Reshape + Unpad"]
UNPAD --> OPROJ["Output proj<br/>(GEMM)"]
OPROJ --> RES1["Residual add"]
end
subgraph "FFN"
RES1 --> LN2["LayerNorm"]
LN2 --> WI["Wi projection<br/>(GEMM)"]
WI --> GEGLU["Split + GeGLU"]
GEGLU --> WO["Wo projection<br/>(GEMM)"]
WO --> RES2["Residual add"]
end
| Operation | Metal | CUDA | CPU | MLX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEMM | MPS (AMX) | cuBLAS FP16 tensor cores | Accelerate / OpenBLAS | Auto-fused |
| Softmax+Scale+Mask | Fused MSL kernel | Fused NVRTC kernel | Scalar loop | Auto-fused |
| RoPE | Custom MSL kernel | Custom NVRTC kernel | Scalar loop | Lazy ops |
| GeGLU (split+gelu+gate) | Fused MSL kernel | Fused NVRTC kernel | Scalar loop | Auto-fused |
| Pad/Unpad/Reshape | Custom MSL kernels | Custom NVRTC kernels | Rust loops | Free (metadata) |
| FP16 support | Yes (all kernels) | Yes (all kernels) | No | No |
Metal and CUDA have hand-written fused kernels for softmax, GeGLU, and attention reshape. These eliminate intermediate buffers and reduce memory bandwidth. MLX gets fusion automatically via lazy evaluation (the entire forward pass typically compiles to 2-3 Metal kernel dispatches). CPU uses explicit scalar loops for everything except GEMM.
Dual search index (transformer engines)
graph LR
subgraph "HybridIndex"
subgraph "SearchIndex (dense vectors)"
EMB["embeddings<br/>(TurboQuant 4-bit compressed)"]
EMB --> CS["Cosine similarity scan"]
end
subgraph "Bm25Index (tantivy)"
TAN["Inverted index<br/>(code-aware tokenizer)"]
TAN --> BM["BM25 scoring<br/>(name 3× / path 1.5× / body 1×)"]
end
CS --> RRF["RRF fusion (k=60)"]
BM --> RRF
end
The transformer BM25 index uses a code-aware tokenizer that splits parseJsonConfig into [parse, json, config] and my_func_name into [my, func, name]. Keyword search finds json config parser even if the function is named in camelCase. Function names are boosted 3x over body text.
TurboQuant compresses 768-dim vectors from 3KB to ~380 bytes (4-bit) with a rotation matrix for better quantization. This enables ~5x faster scanning for large indices while maintaining ranking quality through exact re-ranking of the top candidates.
Performance
Cacheless (ripvec engine, the default). Wall time for a single query, end-to-end including model load on cold start:
| Corpus | First query (cold) | Warm | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small repo (~500 files) | ~7s | 0.3s | Model download + index build dominate cold path |
| Medium repo (~5K files, e.g. Tokio) | ~12s | 0.8s | |
| Large repo (~50K files) | ~50s | 8s | Linear in file count for indexing |
| Linux kernel (~92K files, 1.7 GB) | ~75s | n/a (in-memory drops between processes) |
The MCP daemon holds the in-memory index for the session lifetime, so warm latency dominates after the first query. For sub-MCPs and agent fan-out where each spawn starts fresh, the cold-path numbers are what to budget against. Roughly 100× faster cold-path than ModernBERT cacheless (33s/79s on Gutenberg/Tokio respectively).
Indexed (transformer engines). Time to build the persistent index on first run; subsequent queries against the cached index are milliseconds.
| Hardware | Throughput | Time (Flask corpus, 2383 chunks) |
|---|---|---|
| RTX 4090 (CUDA) | 435 chunks/s | ~5s |
| M2 Max (Metal) | 73.8 chunks/s | ~32s |
| M2 Max (CPU/Accelerate) | 73.5 chunks/s | ~32s |
Metal and CPU show similar throughput on M2 Max because macOS Accelerate routes BLAS operations through the AMX coprocessor regardless of backend. The Metal backend has headroom on larger batches and non-BLAS operations.
Memory. Ripvec engine: ~200 MB for a typical project (embedding table + chunks + BM25). Transformer engines: ~500 MB during embedding (model weights + batch buffers), ~100 MB for query-time.
Where CPU goes on the ripvec engine (linux/92K corpus, sampled).
| Component | % of CPU-time |
|---|---|
| rayon worker synchronization (intrinsic par_iter joins) | ~38% |
tokenizer Unicode normalization (upstream tokenizers crate) |
~10% |
| file I/O (read + open syscalls) | ~5% |
| pool_ids (SIMD f32x8, our kernel) | ~2% |
| tree-sitter parse | ~3% |
| BM25 build + interner | ~3% |
| useful work | ~36% |
The 38% sync floor is structural: rayon's par_iter join semantics require parking workers between stages. We've shipped what's worth shipping past that floor (mimalloc, hand-vectorized pool_ids, bounded-queue streaming pipeline, lasso term interning). Further compression would require restructuring around an async stage scheduler.
How it compares
| Tool | Type | Key difference from ripvec |
|---|---|---|
| ripgrep | Text search | No semantic understanding |
| Sourcegraph | Cloud AI platform | $49-59/user/month, code leaves your machine |
| grepai | Local semantic search | Requires Ollama for embeddings |
| mgrep | Semantic search | Uses cloud embeddings (Mixedbread AI) |
| Serena | MCP symbol navigation | Requires per-language LSP servers installed |
| Bloop | Was semantic + navigation | Archived Jan 2025 |
| VS Code anycode | Tree-sitter outlines | Editor-only, no cross-file search |
| Cursor @Codebase | IDE semantic search | Cursor-only, sends embeddings to cloud |
ripvec is self-contained (no Ollama, no cloud, no per-language setup), runs locally, and combines search + LSP + structural ranking in one binary. The cacheless default fits sub-MCP / fan-out / fresh-worktree workflows where a persistent index isn't viable.
Install
Pre-built binaries (fastest)
Requires cargo-binstall. Downloads a pre-built binary for your platform; no compilation.
From source
For CUDA (Linux with NVIDIA GPU, transformer engines only):
To enable transformer engines on the MCP daemon:
(The default ripvec-mcp build ships only the ripvec engine. The CLI binary ripvec accepts all engines without feature gating.)
Claude Code plugin
The plugin auto-downloads the binary for your platform on first use and configures both MCP and LSP servers. It includes 3 skills (codebase orientation, semantic discovery, change impact analysis), 3 commands (/map, /find, /repo-index), and a code exploration agent. CUDA is auto-detected via nvidia-smi.
Platforms
| Platform | Backends | GPU |
|---|---|---|
| macOS Apple Silicon | Metal + MLX + CPU (Accelerate) | Metal auto-enabled |
| Linux x86_64 | CPU (OpenBLAS) | CUDA with --features cuda |
| Linux ARM64 (Graviton) | CPU (OpenBLAS) | CUDA with --features cuda |
Model weights download automatically on first run: ~33MB (potion-base-32M, default ripvec engine) or ~100MB (ModernBERT). The cross-encoder reranker (ms-marco-MiniLM-L-12-v2, 33MB) downloads on first use of the ripvec engine.
Usage
CLI
MCP server
Tools (7 retrieval + 9 LSP):
| Category | Tools |
|---|---|
| Retrieval | search (with scope / include_extensions / exclude_extensions), find_similar, find_duplicates, get_repo_map, reindex, index_status, up_to_date |
| LSP | lsp_document_symbols, lsp_workspace_symbols, lsp_hover, lsp_goto_definition, lsp_goto_implementation, lsp_references, lsp_prepare_call_hierarchy, lsp_incoming_calls, lsp_outgoing_calls |
| Diagnostics | debug_log, log_level |
The 2.0.0 release collapsed search_code and search_text into a single search tool with an intent-shaped scope parameter (code / docs / all). The agent picks scope based on what they're looking for; the corpus-aware rerank gate decides whether the L-12 cross-encoder fires.
Engine selection is per-daemon via RIPVEC_MCP_ENGINE={ripvec,modernbert,bert}; default is ripvec. Tool schemas are stable across engines: index_status reports engine: "ripvec" and cache_location: "in-memory" under the ripvec engine, engine: "modernbert" and an on-disk path under transformer engines.
LSP server
Same binary, --lsp flag selects protocol.
Supported languages
19 tree-sitter grammars, 30 file extensions:
| Language | Extensions | Extracted elements |
|---|---|---|
| Rust | .rs |
functions, structs, enums, variants, fields, impls, traits, consts, mods |
| Python | .py |
functions, classes, assignments |
| JavaScript | .js .jsx |
functions, classes, methods, variables |
| TypeScript | .ts .tsx |
functions, classes, interfaces, type aliases, enums |
| Go | .go |
functions, methods, types, constants |
| Java | .java |
methods, classes, interfaces, enums, fields, constructors |
| C | .c .h |
functions, structs, enums, typedefs |
| C++ | .cpp .cc .cxx .hpp |
functions, classes, namespaces, enums, fields |
| Bash | .sh .bash .bats |
functions, variables |
| Ruby | .rb |
methods, classes, modules, constants |
| HCL / Terraform | .tf .tfvars .hcl |
blocks (resources, data, variables) |
| Kotlin | .kt .kts |
functions, classes, objects, properties |
| Swift | .swift |
functions, classes, protocols, properties |
| Scala | .scala |
functions, classes, traits, objects, vals, types |
| TOML | .toml |
tables, key-value pairs |
| JSON | .json |
object keys |
| YAML | .yaml .yml |
mapping keys |
| Markdown | .md |
headings |
Unsupported file types get sliding-window plain-text chunking. The embedding model handles any language; tree-sitter just provides better chunk boundaries.
Acknowledgments
ripvec's static bi-encoder uses Model2Vec embeddings (potion-base-32M, potion-code-16M) from MinishLab, whose semble pipeline inspired the path-enriched BM25 and query-shape boosting design we ported to Rust and extended. Cross-encoder rerank uses ms-marco-MiniLM-L-12-v2. See CREDITS.md for the full ledger of what we used, what we ported, and what we built on top.
Limitations
- goToDefinition is best-effort: resolves by name matching and structural importance, not by type system analysis. Use dedicated LSPs (rust-analyzer, pyright, gopls) when you need exact resolution for overloaded symbols.
- Call graph is approximate: common names like
new,run,rendermay resolve to the wrong definition. Cross-crate resolution limited to workspace members. - Ripvec engine top-10 coherence on long-form prose: ModernBERT retains an edge on narrative corpora where a single source document is the right answer for every position in the top-10. Top-3 quality is competitive; coherent top-10 is not. If you're searching a legal archive or a book collection and need 10 contiguous hits from the same source,
--model modernbert --indexis the better tool. - Cacheless cold start scales linearly: first-query indexing on the ripvec engine is O(files). At 92K files (Linux kernel) it's ~75s. Persistent transformer engines amortize this across runs but pay model-download and disk-cache costs.
- English-centric: both engines were trained primarily on English text. Queries and code comments in other languages will have lower recall.
Development
&& &&
See CLAUDE.md for detailed development conventions, architecture notes, and MCP tool namespace resolution.
Architecture
Cargo workspace with three crates:
| Crate | Role |
|---|---|
ripvec-core |
Engines (ripvec + transformer), backends, chunking, embedding, search, repo map, cache, call graph, ranking layers |
ripvec |
CLI binary (clap + ratatui TUI) |
ripvec-mcp |
MCP + LSP server binary (rmcp + tower-lsp-server) |
Docs
- CREDITS.md: full attribution for models, libraries, and design inspiration
- Metal/MPS Architecture
- CUDA Architecture
- Development Learnings
License
Licensed under either of Apache-2.0 or MIT at your option.