{
"request": {
"state": {
"available_actions": [
{
"args": {},
"cost": 1,
"description": "Read recent application error logs and compare failure signatures.",
"id": "logs",
"tool": "logs"
},
{
"args": {},
"cost": 1,
"description": "Inspect latency, error rates, connection usage, and cache behavior.",
"id": "metrics",
"tool": "metrics"
},
{
"args": {},
"cost": 1,
"description": "Inspect recent deployment changes and release validation results.",
"id": "deploys",
"tool": "deploys"
}
],
"goal": "Restore checkout and verify healthy requests after the repair.",
"observations": [
{
"alert": "Checkout requests are failing; p95 latency is elevated.",
"objective": "Restore checkout and verify recovery. All operations affect only this local sandbox.",
"service": "checkout",
"timeline": "An application release completed 12 minutes before the alert."
}
],
"remaining_credits": 24
},
"questions": {
"a0_information": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": {
"candidate": {
"args": {},
"cost": 1,
"description": "Read recent application error logs and compare failure signatures.",
"id": "logs",
"tool": "logs"
},
"question": "How much useful new evidence would this action reveal?",
"rules": [
"Judge this exact candidate against the current observations.",
"Do not assume the candidate has been executed.",
"Use the latest observations when older ones were superseded by a repair.",
"The goal is verified checkout recovery with few unnecessary actions."
]
},
"criteria": [
"No new evidence or repeats current known information",
"Minor detail unlikely to affect the next decision",
"Useful evidence about an unresolved hypothesis",
"Directly discriminates plausible causes or verifies an unverified repair"
]
},
"a0_progress": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": {
"candidate": {
"args": {},
"cost": 1,
"description": "Read recent application error logs and compare failure signatures.",
"id": "logs",
"tool": "logs"
},
"question": "How directly would this action advance verified recovery?",
"rules": [
"Judge this exact candidate against the current observations.",
"Do not assume the candidate has been executed.",
"Use the latest observations when older ones were superseded by a repair.",
"The goal is verified checkout recovery with few unnecessary actions."
]
},
"criteria": [
"No relevant progress, redundant, or contradicted by evidence",
"A plausible step but weak evidence it addresses the current blocker",
"Evidence supports this repair or a needed prerequisite",
"The clearly supported repair, or verification immediately after a repair"
]
},
"a0_risk": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": {
"candidate": {
"args": {},
"cost": 1,
"description": "Read recent application error logs and compare failure signatures.",
"id": "logs",
"tool": "logs"
},
"question": "How much avoidable disruption could this action cause in this sandbox?",
"rules": [
"Judge this exact candidate against the current observations.",
"Do not assume the candidate has been executed.",
"Use the latest observations when older ones were superseded by a repair.",
"The goal is verified checkout recovery with few unnecessary actions."
]
},
"criteria": [
"Read-only observation with no service mutation",
"Narrow reversible change supported by current evidence",
"Speculative mutation with little supporting evidence",
"Mutation contradicted by evidence or likely to worsen the incident"
]
},
"a1_information": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": {
"candidate": {
"args": {},
"cost": 1,
"description": "Inspect latency, error rates, connection usage, and cache behavior.",
"id": "metrics",
"tool": "metrics"
},
"question": "How much useful new evidence would this action reveal?",
"rules": [
"Judge this exact candidate against the current observations.",
"Do not assume the candidate has been executed.",
"Use the latest observations when older ones were superseded by a repair.",
"The goal is verified checkout recovery with few unnecessary actions."
]
},
"criteria": [
"No new evidence or repeats current known information",
"Minor detail unlikely to affect the next decision",
"Useful evidence about an unresolved hypothesis",
"Directly discriminates plausible causes or verifies an unverified repair"
]
},
"a1_progress": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": {
"candidate": {
"args": {},
"cost": 1,
"description": "Inspect latency, error rates, connection usage, and cache behavior.",
"id": "metrics",
"tool": "metrics"
},
"question": "How directly would this action advance verified recovery?",
"rules": [
"Judge this exact candidate against the current observations.",
"Do not assume the candidate has been executed.",
"Use the latest observations when older ones were superseded by a repair.",
"The goal is verified checkout recovery with few unnecessary actions."
]
},
"criteria": [
"No relevant progress, redundant, or contradicted by evidence",
"A plausible step but weak evidence it addresses the current blocker",
"Evidence supports this repair or a needed prerequisite",
"The clearly supported repair, or verification immediately after a repair"
]
},
"a1_risk": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": {
"candidate": {
"args": {},
"cost": 1,
"description": "Inspect latency, error rates, connection usage, and cache behavior.",
"id": "metrics",
"tool": "metrics"
},
"question": "How much avoidable disruption could this action cause in this sandbox?",
"rules": [
"Judge this exact candidate against the current observations.",
"Do not assume the candidate has been executed.",
"Use the latest observations when older ones were superseded by a repair.",
"The goal is verified checkout recovery with few unnecessary actions."
]
},
"criteria": [
"Read-only observation with no service mutation",
"Narrow reversible change supported by current evidence",
"Speculative mutation with little supporting evidence",
"Mutation contradicted by evidence or likely to worsen the incident"
]
},
"a2_information": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": {
"candidate": {
"args": {},
"cost": 1,
"description": "Inspect recent deployment changes and release validation results.",
"id": "deploys",
"tool": "deploys"
},
"question": "How much useful new evidence would this action reveal?",
"rules": [
"Judge this exact candidate against the current observations.",
"Do not assume the candidate has been executed.",
"Use the latest observations when older ones were superseded by a repair.",
"The goal is verified checkout recovery with few unnecessary actions."
]
},
"criteria": [
"No new evidence or repeats current known information",
"Minor detail unlikely to affect the next decision",
"Useful evidence about an unresolved hypothesis",
"Directly discriminates plausible causes or verifies an unverified repair"
]
},
"a2_progress": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": {
"candidate": {
"args": {},
"cost": 1,
"description": "Inspect recent deployment changes and release validation results.",
"id": "deploys",
"tool": "deploys"
},
"question": "How directly would this action advance verified recovery?",
"rules": [
"Judge this exact candidate against the current observations.",
"Do not assume the candidate has been executed.",
"Use the latest observations when older ones were superseded by a repair.",
"The goal is verified checkout recovery with few unnecessary actions."
]
},
"criteria": [
"No relevant progress, redundant, or contradicted by evidence",
"A plausible step but weak evidence it addresses the current blocker",
"Evidence supports this repair or a needed prerequisite",
"The clearly supported repair, or verification immediately after a repair"
]
},
"a2_risk": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": {
"candidate": {
"args": {},
"cost": 1,
"description": "Inspect recent deployment changes and release validation results.",
"id": "deploys",
"tool": "deploys"
},
"question": "How much avoidable disruption could this action cause in this sandbox?",
"rules": [
"Judge this exact candidate against the current observations.",
"Do not assume the candidate has been executed.",
"Use the latest observations when older ones were superseded by a repair.",
"The goal is verified checkout recovery with few unnecessary actions."
]
},
"criteria": [
"Read-only observation with no service mutation",
"Narrow reversible change supported by current evidence",
"Speculative mutation with little supporting evidence",
"Mutation contradicted by evidence or likely to worsen the incident"
]
},
"diagnosis": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "Which cause is best supported by the observed tool results? A recent deployment alone does not establish causation. Choose unknown when evidence does not distinguish causes. Judge only observed evidence, not unexecuted actions.",
"criteria": {
"bad_deploy": "A regression in the newly deployed application version",
"pool_exhaustion": "Database connection pool exhaustion; waiting for connections",
"stale_cache": "Stale cache entries incompatible with the current application",
"unknown": "Observations do not yet distinguish these causes, or suggest another cause"
}
},
"resolved": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "The most recent verification AFTER the most recent repair explicitly shows healthy checkout requests. Repair acknowledgement without verification is not evidence of recovery."
}
},
"model": "jev-latest"
},
"response": {
"model": "jev-1.13.0",
"answers": {
"a0_information": {
"type": "score",
"score": 2.58,
"probabilities": {
"0": 0.01,
"1": 0.01,
"2": 0.37,
"3": 0.61
},
"legend": {
"0": "No new evidence or repeats current known information",
"1": "Minor detail unlikely to affect the next decision",
"2": "Useful evidence about an unresolved hypothesis",
"3": "Directly discriminates plausible causes or verifies an unverified repair"
},
"confidence": 0.58
},
"a0_progress": {
"type": "score",
"score": 1.83,
"probabilities": {
"0": 0.01,
"1": 0.23,
"2": 0.67,
"3": 0.08
},
"legend": {
"0": "No relevant progress, redundant, or contradicted by evidence",
"1": "A plausible step but weak evidence it addresses the current blocker",
"2": "Evidence supports this repair or a needed prerequisite",
"3": "The clearly supported repair, or verification immediately after a repair"
},
"confidence": 0.66
},
"a0_risk": {
"type": "score",
"score": 0.0,
"probabilities": {
"0": 1.0,
"1": 0.0,
"2": 0.0,
"3": 0.0
},
"legend": {
"0": "Read-only observation with no service mutation",
"1": "Narrow reversible change supported by current evidence",
"2": "Speculative mutation with little supporting evidence",
"3": "Mutation contradicted by evidence or likely to worsen the incident"
},
"confidence": 1.0
},
"a1_information": {
"type": "score",
"score": 2.53,
"probabilities": {
"0": 0.08,
"1": 0.03,
"2": 0.17,
"3": 0.72
},
"legend": {
"0": "No new evidence or repeats current known information",
"1": "Minor detail unlikely to affect the next decision",
"2": "Useful evidence about an unresolved hypothesis",
"3": "Directly discriminates plausible causes or verifies an unverified repair"
},
"confidence": 0.53
},
"a1_progress": {
"type": "score",
"score": 2.38,
"probabilities": {
"0": 0.02,
"1": 0.19,
"2": 0.18,
"3": 0.61
},
"legend": {
"0": "No relevant progress, redundant, or contradicted by evidence",
"1": "A plausible step but weak evidence it addresses the current blocker",
"2": "Evidence supports this repair or a needed prerequisite",
"3": "The clearly supported repair, or verification immediately after a repair"
},
"confidence": 0.38
},
"a1_risk": {
"type": "score",
"score": 0.0,
"probabilities": {
"0": 1.0,
"1": 0.0,
"2": 0.0,
"3": 0.0
},
"legend": {
"0": "Read-only observation with no service mutation",
"1": "Narrow reversible change supported by current evidence",
"2": "Speculative mutation with little supporting evidence",
"3": "Mutation contradicted by evidence or likely to worsen the incident"
},
"confidence": 1.0
},
"a2_information": {
"type": "score",
"score": 2.66,
"probabilities": {
"0": 0.01,
"1": 0.0,
"2": 0.31,
"3": 0.68
},
"legend": {
"0": "No new evidence or repeats current known information",
"1": "Minor detail unlikely to affect the next decision",
"2": "Useful evidence about an unresolved hypothesis",
"3": "Directly discriminates plausible causes or verifies an unverified repair"
},
"confidence": 0.66
},
"a2_progress": {
"type": "score",
"score": 1.95,
"probabilities": {
"0": 0.0,
"1": 0.14,
"2": 0.76,
"3": 0.1
},
"legend": {
"0": "No relevant progress, redundant, or contradicted by evidence",
"1": "A plausible step but weak evidence it addresses the current blocker",
"2": "Evidence supports this repair or a needed prerequisite",
"3": "The clearly supported repair, or verification immediately after a repair"
},
"confidence": 0.75
},
"a2_risk": {
"type": "score",
"score": 0.01,
"probabilities": {
"0": 0.99,
"1": 0.01,
"2": 0.0,
"3": 0.0
},
"legend": {
"0": "Read-only observation with no service mutation",
"1": "Narrow reversible change supported by current evidence",
"2": "Speculative mutation with little supporting evidence",
"3": "Mutation contradicted by evidence or likely to worsen the incident"
},
"confidence": 0.99
},
"diagnosis": {
"type": "choice",
"choice": "unknown",
"probabilities": {
"bad_deploy": 0.03,
"pool_exhaustion": 0.0,
"stale_cache": 0.0,
"unknown": 0.97
},
"confidence": 0.95
},
"resolved": {
"type": "noul",
"noul": 0.17
}
},
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 2549,
"output_tokens": 210
}
}
}