re_redap_tests 0.34.0

Official test suite for the Rerun Data Protocol
Documentation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
use futures::TryStreamExt as _;
use itertools::Itertools as _;

use re_protos::cloud::v1alpha1::ext::{self, DataSource, QueryDatasetRequest};
use re_protos::cloud::v1alpha1::rerun_cloud_service_server::RerunCloudService;
use re_protos::cloud::v1alpha1::{RegisterWithDatasetRequest, ScanDatasetManifestRequest};
use re_protos::common::v1alpha1::ext::IfDuplicateBehavior;
use re_protos::headers::RerunHeadersInjectorExt as _;
use re_types_core::{ChunkId, LayerName};
use url::Url;

use super::common::{
    DataSourcesDefinition, LayerDefinition, RerunCloudServiceExt as _, entry_name,
};
use crate::{TempPath, create_simple_recording_in};

type Result<T = ()> = anyhow::Result<T>;

// --- helpers ---

fn create_rrd(tuid_prefix: u64, segment_id: &str, entities: &[&str]) -> Result<TempPath> {
    let tmp_dir = tempfile::tempdir()?;
    let path = create_simple_recording_in(
        tuid_prefix,
        segment_id,
        entities,
        0,
        re_log_types::TimeType::Sequence,
        tmp_dir.path(),
    )?;
    Ok(TempPath::new(tmp_dir, path))
}

fn file_url(path: &TempPath) -> Url {
    Url::from_file_path(path.as_path()).expect("absolute path")
}

fn asset_layer_request(
    dataset_name: &str,
    layer_name: &str,
    url: Url,
    on_duplicate: IfDuplicateBehavior,
) -> tonic::Request<RegisterWithDatasetRequest> {
    tonic::Request::new(RegisterWithDatasetRequest {
        data_sources: vec![DataSource::new_rrd_asset_layer(layer_name, url).into()],
        on_duplicate: re_protos::common::v1alpha1::IfDuplicateBehavior::from(on_duplicate) as i32,
    })
    .with_entry_name(entry_name(dataset_name))
}

fn segment_layer_request(
    dataset_name: &str,
    layer_name: &str,
    url: &Url,
    on_duplicate: IfDuplicateBehavior,
) -> Result<tonic::Request<RegisterWithDatasetRequest>> {
    Ok(tonic::Request::new(RegisterWithDatasetRequest {
        data_sources: vec![DataSource::new_rrd_layer(layer_name, url.as_str())?.into()],
        on_duplicate: re_protos::common::v1alpha1::IfDuplicateBehavior::from(on_duplicate) as i32,
    })
    .with_entry_name(entry_name(dataset_name)))
}

async fn register_asset_layer(
    service: &impl RerunCloudService,
    dataset_name: &str,
    layer_name: &str,
    url: Url,
    on_duplicate: IfDuplicateBehavior,
) -> Result {
    service
        .register_with_dataset(asset_layer_request(
            dataset_name,
            layer_name,
            url,
            on_duplicate,
        ))
        .await?;
    Ok(())
}

async fn scan_manifest(
    service: &impl RerunCloudService,
    dataset_name: &str,
) -> Result<arrow::array::RecordBatch> {
    let responses: Vec<_> = service
        .scan_dataset_manifest(
            tonic::Request::new(ScanDatasetManifestRequest {
                columns: vec![], // all
            })
            .with_entry_name(entry_name(dataset_name)),
        )
        .await?
        .into_inner()
        .try_collect()
        .await?;

    let mut batches: Vec<arrow::array::RecordBatch> = Vec::new();
    for resp in responses {
        batches.push(resp.data.expect("response is missing data").try_into()?);
    }

    let schema = batches
        .first()
        .expect("empty manifest response")
        .schema_ref()
        .clone();
    Ok(arrow::compute::concat_batches(&schema, &batches)?)
}

fn manifest_layer_names(batch: &arrow::array::RecordBatch) -> Vec<String> {
    ext::ScanDatasetManifestDataframe::COLUMN_RERUN_LAYER_NAME
        .extract(batch)
        .expect("valid layer name column")
        .into_iter_owned()
        .map(LayerName::into_string)
        .sorted()
        .collect()
}

/// The segment ids of all manifest rows with the given layer name, sorted.
fn segment_ids_of_layer(batch: &arrow::array::RecordBatch, layer_name: &str) -> Vec<String> {
    let layer_names = ext::ScanDatasetManifestDataframe::COLUMN_RERUN_LAYER_NAME
        .extract(batch)
        .expect("valid layer name column");
    let segment_ids = ext::ScanDatasetManifestDataframe::COLUMN_RERUN_SEGMENT_ID
        .extract(batch)
        .expect("valid segment id column");
    std::iter::zip(&layer_names, &segment_ids)
        .filter(|(name, _)| name == &layer_name)
        .map(|(_, segment_id)| String::from(segment_id))
        .sorted()
        .collect()
}

fn collect_chunk_ids(batches: &[arrow::array::RecordBatch]) -> Vec<ChunkId> {
    use re_protos::cloud::v1alpha1::ext::QueryDatasetDataframe;
    let mut ids = Vec::new();
    for batch in batches {
        let col = QueryDatasetDataframe::COLUMN_CHUNK_ID
            .extract(batch)
            .expect("bad chunk id column");
        ids.extend(col.iter_owned());
    }
    ids
}

async fn query_entity(
    service: &impl RerunCloudService,
    dataset_name: &str,
    segment_id: &str,
    entity_path: &str,
) -> Result<Vec<arrow::array::RecordBatch>> {
    let responses: Vec<_> = service
        .query_dataset(
            tonic::Request::new(
                QueryDatasetRequest {
                    segment_ids: vec![segment_id.to_owned().into()],
                    entity_paths: vec![entity_path.into()],
                    select_all_entity_paths: false,
                    ..Default::default()
                }
                .into(),
            )
            .with_entry_name(entry_name(dataset_name)),
        )
        .await?
        .into_inner()
        .try_collect()
        .await?;

    let mut batches = Vec::new();
    for resp in responses {
        if let Some(dfp) = resp.data {
            batches.push(dfp.try_into()?);
        }
    }
    Ok(batches)
}

// --- tests ---

/// An asset layer appears in the manifest once per segment.
///
/// TODO(RR-4807): consider this choice — a corollary is that an asset layer registered
/// to a dataset without segments is invisible in the manifest.
pub async fn register_asset_layer_appears_in_manifest(service: impl RerunCloudService) -> Result {
    let asset = create_rrd(1, "asset_recording_id", &["robot/urdf"])?;
    let asset_url = file_url(&asset);

    let dataset_name = "dataset";
    service.create_dataset_entry_with_name(dataset_name).await;

    register_asset_layer(
        &service,
        dataset_name,
        "robot_urdf",
        asset_url,
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Error,
    )
    .await?;

    // No segments yet, so the asset layer is invisible in the manifest.
    assert_eq!(
        scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?.num_rows(),
        0,
        "asset layer should be invisible in the manifest of a segment-less dataset"
    );

    // Register a segment; the asset layer should now appear for it.
    let segments_def = DataSourcesDefinition::new_with_tuid_prefix(
        100,
        [LayerDefinition::simple("seg1", &["my/entity"])],
    );
    service
        .register_with_dataset_name_blocking(dataset_name, segments_def.to_data_sources())
        .await;

    let manifest = scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?;
    assert_eq!(
        manifest_layer_names(&manifest),
        ["base", "robot_urdf"],
        "asset layer should appear in the manifest alongside the segment layer"
    );
    assert_eq!(
        segment_ids_of_layer(&manifest, "robot_urdf"),
        ["seg1"],
        "the asset layer row should carry the segment's id"
    );
    Ok(())
}

/// An asset layer and regular segment layers coexist in the manifest.
pub async fn register_asset_layer_coexists_with_segment_layers(
    service: impl RerunCloudService,
) -> Result {
    let segments_def = DataSourcesDefinition::new_with_tuid_prefix(
        1,
        [
            LayerDefinition::simple("seg1", &["my/entity"]),
            LayerDefinition::simple("seg2", &["my/entity"]),
        ],
    );

    // Asset uses a separate tuid prefix to avoid chunk-id collision with segments.
    let asset = create_rrd(100, "asset_id", &["robot/urdf"])?;
    let asset_url = file_url(&asset);

    let dataset_name = "dataset";
    service.create_dataset_entry_with_name(dataset_name).await;

    service
        .register_with_dataset_name_blocking(dataset_name, segments_def.to_data_sources())
        .await;

    register_asset_layer(
        &service,
        dataset_name,
        "robot_urdf",
        asset_url,
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Error,
    )
    .await?;

    let manifest = scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?;

    // The asset layer is listed once per segment, next to each segment's own layers.
    // TODO(RR-4807): consider this choice.
    assert_eq!(
        manifest_layer_names(&manifest),
        ["base", "base", "robot_urdf", "robot_urdf"],
        "expected one base row and one asset row per segment"
    );
    assert_eq!(
        segment_ids_of_layer(&manifest, "robot_urdf"),
        ["seg1", "seg2"],
        "the asset layer should appear in every segment"
    );
    Ok(())
}

/// Querying the dataset returns the asset layer chunks for every segment.
pub async fn query_dataset_asset_layer_included_in_all_segments(
    service: impl RerunCloudService,
) -> Result {
    let segments_def = DataSourcesDefinition::new_with_tuid_prefix(
        1,
        [
            LayerDefinition::simple("seg1", &["my/entity"]),
            LayerDefinition::simple("seg2", &["my/entity"]),
        ],
    );

    // Asset uses a separate tuid prefix to avoid chunk-id collision with segments.
    let asset = create_rrd(100, "asset_id", &["robot/urdf"])?;
    let asset_url = file_url(&asset);

    let dataset_name = "dataset";
    service.create_dataset_entry_with_name(dataset_name).await;

    service
        .register_with_dataset_name_blocking(dataset_name, segments_def.to_data_sources())
        .await;

    register_asset_layer(
        &service,
        dataset_name,
        "robot_urdf",
        asset_url,
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Error,
    )
    .await?;

    for segment_id in ["seg1", "seg2"] {
        let batches = query_entity(&service, dataset_name, segment_id, "/robot/urdf").await?;
        let total_rows: usize = batches.iter().map(|b| b.num_rows()).sum();
        assert!(
            total_rows > 0,
            "segment '{segment_id}' should see asset layer chunks for /robot/urdf (got {total_rows} rows)"
        );
    }
    Ok(())
}

/// Re-registering an asset layer with `on_duplicate = Error` fails as expected.
pub async fn register_asset_layer_duplicate_error(service: impl RerunCloudService) -> Result {
    let asset = create_rrd(1, "asset_id", &["robot/urdf"])?;
    let asset_url = file_url(&asset);

    let dataset_name = "dataset";
    service.create_dataset_entry_with_name(dataset_name).await;

    let make_request = || {
        tonic::Request::new(RegisterWithDatasetRequest {
            data_sources: vec![
                DataSource::new_rrd_asset_layer("robot_urdf", asset_url.clone()).into(),
            ],
            on_duplicate: re_protos::common::v1alpha1::IfDuplicateBehavior::from(
                IfDuplicateBehavior::Error,
            ) as i32,
        })
        .with_entry_name(entry_name(dataset_name))
    };

    service.register_with_dataset(make_request()).await?;

    let err = service
        .register_with_dataset(make_request())
        .await
        .expect_err("second registration with Error policy should fail");
    assert_eq!(err.code(), tonic::Code::AlreadyExists);
    Ok(())
}

/// Re-registering an asset layer with `on_duplicate = Overwrite` succeeds,
/// also when the asset layer has already been propagated to existing segments.
pub async fn register_asset_layer_duplicate_overwrite(service: impl RerunCloudService) -> Result {
    let segments_def = DataSourcesDefinition::new_with_tuid_prefix(
        1,
        [LayerDefinition::simple("seg1", &["my/entity"])],
    );

    // Asset uses a separate tuid prefix to avoid chunk-id collision with segments.
    let asset = create_rrd(100, "asset_id", &["robot/urdf"])?;
    let asset_url = file_url(&asset);

    let dataset_name = "dataset";
    service.create_dataset_entry_with_name(dataset_name).await;

    service
        .register_with_dataset_name_blocking(dataset_name, segments_def.to_data_sources())
        .await;

    let make_request = || {
        tonic::Request::new(RegisterWithDatasetRequest {
            data_sources: vec![
                DataSource::new_rrd_asset_layer("robot_urdf", asset_url.clone()).into(),
            ],
            on_duplicate: re_protos::common::v1alpha1::IfDuplicateBehavior::from(
                IfDuplicateBehavior::Overwrite,
            ) as i32,
        })
        .with_entry_name(entry_name(dataset_name))
    };

    service.register_with_dataset(make_request()).await?;
    // The second registration overwrites the asset layer both in the dataset
    // and in the existing segment it was propagated to.
    service.register_with_dataset(make_request()).await?;

    let layer_names = manifest_layer_names(&scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?);
    assert_eq!(
        layer_names
            .iter()
            .filter(|name| *name == "robot_urdf")
            .count(),
        1,
        "only one asset row should exist after overwrite (got {layer_names:?})"
    );
    Ok(())
}

/// Re-registering a layer under the same name but with a different class (segment ↔ asset)
/// works after unregistering the original entry first.
///
/// As a segment layer, `my_layer` only exists in its own segment.
/// As an asset layer, it appears in every segment (`anchor1`, `anchor2`, …).
pub async fn reregister_layer_change_class(service: impl RerunCloudService) -> Result {
    // Two anchor segments, so we can tell a segment layer (one segment)
    // from an asset layer (all segments) apart in the manifest.
    let anchors_def = DataSourcesDefinition::new_with_tuid_prefix(
        1,
        [
            LayerDefinition::simple("anchor1", &["my/entity"]),
            LayerDefinition::simple("anchor2", &["my/entity"]),
        ],
    );

    // Separate tuid prefixes so chunk ids don't collide.
    let seg_rrd = create_rrd(100, "seg_id", &["my/entity"])?;
    let seg_url = file_url(&seg_rrd);

    let asset_rrd = create_rrd(200, "asset_id", &["my/entity"])?;
    let asset_url = file_url(&asset_rrd);

    let dataset_name = "dataset";
    service.create_dataset_entry_with_name(dataset_name).await;

    service
        .register_with_dataset_name_blocking(dataset_name, anchors_def.to_data_sources())
        .await;

    // --- Segment → Asset ---

    service
        .register_with_dataset_name_blocking(
            dataset_name,
            vec![DataSource::new_rrd_layer("my_layer", seg_url.as_str())?.into()],
        )
        .await;

    let manifest = scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?;
    assert_eq!(
        segment_ids_of_layer(&manifest, "my_layer"),
        ["seg_id"],
        "as a segment layer, 'my_layer' should only exist in its own segment"
    );

    service
        .unregister_from_dataset_name(dataset_name, &[], &["my_layer"])
        .await?;

    let manifest = scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?;
    assert!(
        segment_ids_of_layer(&manifest, "my_layer").is_empty(),
        "'my_layer' should be gone after unregister"
    );

    register_asset_layer(
        &service,
        dataset_name,
        "my_layer",
        asset_url,
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Error,
    )
    .await?;

    let manifest = scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?;
    assert_eq!(
        segment_ids_of_layer(&manifest, "my_layer"),
        ["anchor1", "anchor2"],
        "as an asset layer, 'my_layer' should appear in every segment"
    );

    // --- Asset → Segment ---

    service
        .unregister_from_dataset_name(dataset_name, &[], &["my_layer"])
        .await?;

    let manifest = scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?;
    assert!(
        segment_ids_of_layer(&manifest, "my_layer").is_empty(),
        "'my_layer' should be gone after unregistering the asset layer"
    );

    service
        .register_with_dataset_name_blocking(
            dataset_name,
            vec![DataSource::new_rrd_layer("my_layer", seg_url.as_str())?.into()],
        )
        .await;

    let manifest = scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?;
    assert_eq!(
        segment_ids_of_layer(&manifest, "my_layer"),
        ["seg_id"],
        "re-registered layer should be a segment layer again"
    );
    Ok(())
}

/// When querying multiple segments, the asset layer's chunk IDs appear identically in every
/// segment's result — the same chunk IDs are duplicated across segments.
pub async fn query_dataset_asset_chunk_ids_duplicated_across_segments(
    service: impl RerunCloudService,
) -> Result {
    let segments_def = DataSourcesDefinition::new_with_tuid_prefix(
        1,
        [
            LayerDefinition::simple("seg1", &["my/entity"]),
            LayerDefinition::simple("seg2", &["my/entity"]),
        ],
    );

    // Asset uses a separate tuid prefix to avoid chunk-id collision with segments.
    let asset = create_rrd(100, "asset_id", &["robot/urdf"])?;
    let asset_url = file_url(&asset);

    let dataset_name = "dataset";
    service.create_dataset_entry_with_name(dataset_name).await;

    service
        .register_with_dataset_name_blocking(dataset_name, segments_def.to_data_sources())
        .await;

    register_asset_layer(
        &service,
        dataset_name,
        "robot_urdf",
        asset_url,
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Error,
    )
    .await?;

    let ids_seg1 =
        collect_chunk_ids(&query_entity(&service, dataset_name, "seg1", "/robot/urdf").await?);
    let ids_seg2 =
        collect_chunk_ids(&query_entity(&service, dataset_name, "seg2", "/robot/urdf").await?);

    assert!(
        !ids_seg1.is_empty(),
        "seg1 should return asset layer chunks"
    );
    assert!(
        !ids_seg2.is_empty(),
        "seg2 should return asset layer chunks"
    );

    let common: Vec<_> = ids_seg1.iter().filter(|id| ids_seg2.contains(id)).collect();
    assert!(
        !common.is_empty(),
        "asset layer chunk IDs must be duplicated across segments (seg1={ids_seg1:?}, seg2={ids_seg2:?})"
    );
    Ok(())
}

/// Unregistering works for both asset layers and segment layers.
pub async fn unregister_asset_and_segment_layers(service: impl RerunCloudService) -> Result {
    let segments_def = DataSourcesDefinition::new_with_tuid_prefix(
        1,
        [LayerDefinition::simple("seg1", &["my/entity"])],
    );

    let asset = create_rrd(100, "asset_id", &["robot/urdf"])?;
    let asset_url = file_url(&asset);

    let dataset_name = "dataset";
    service.create_dataset_entry_with_name(dataset_name).await;

    service
        .register_with_dataset_name_blocking(dataset_name, segments_def.to_data_sources())
        .await;

    register_asset_layer(
        &service,
        dataset_name,
        "robot_urdf",
        asset_url,
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Error,
    )
    .await?;

    assert_eq!(
        scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?.num_rows(),
        2,
        "should have 1 segment row + 1 asset row"
    );

    // Unregister the segment layer by layer name (no segment filter).
    service
        .unregister_from_dataset_name(dataset_name, &[], &["base"])
        .await?;

    assert_eq!(
        manifest_layer_names(&scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?),
        ["robot_urdf"],
        "only the asset layer should remain after removing segment layer"
    );

    // Unregister the asset layer by layer name.
    service
        .unregister_from_dataset_name(dataset_name, &[], &["robot_urdf"])
        .await?;

    assert_eq!(
        scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?.num_rows(),
        0,
        "manifest should be empty after removing both layers"
    );
    Ok(())
}

/// Registering an asset layer whose name collides with an existing *segment* layer
/// is rejected, regardless of `on_duplicate` — the layer classes differ.
pub async fn asset_layer_name_collision_with_segment_layer_errors(
    service: impl RerunCloudService,
) -> Result {
    // A segment with the segment layer "base":
    let segments_def = DataSourcesDefinition::new_with_tuid_prefix(
        1,
        [LayerDefinition::simple("seg1", &["my/entity"])],
    );

    let asset = create_rrd(100, "asset_id", &["robot/urdf"])?;
    let asset_url = file_url(&asset);

    let dataset_name = "dataset";
    service.create_dataset_entry_with_name(dataset_name).await;

    service
        .register_with_dataset_name_blocking(dataset_name, segments_def.to_data_sources())
        .await;

    for on_duplicate in [
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Error,
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Overwrite,
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Skip,
    ] {
        let err = service
            .register_with_dataset(asset_layer_request(
                dataset_name,
                "base",
                asset_url.clone(),
                on_duplicate,
            ))
            .await
            .expect_err("registering an asset layer named like a segment layer should fail");
        assert_eq!(err.code(), tonic::Code::AlreadyExists, "{on_duplicate:?}");
        assert!(
            err.message().contains("layer class"),
            "error should mention the layer class conflict, got: {}",
            err.message()
        );
    }

    // The segment layer should be untouched.
    assert_eq!(
        manifest_layer_names(&scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?),
        ["base"],
        "the segment layer should be untouched by the failed registrations"
    );
    Ok(())
}

/// Registering a segment layer whose name collides with an existing *asset* layer
/// is rejected, regardless of `on_duplicate` — the layer classes differ.
pub async fn segment_layer_name_collision_with_asset_layer_errors(
    service: impl RerunCloudService,
) -> Result {
    let asset = create_rrd(1, "asset_id", &["robot/urdf"])?;
    let asset_url = file_url(&asset);

    let seg_rrd = create_rrd(100, "seg_id", &["my/entity"])?;
    let seg_url = file_url(&seg_rrd);

    let dataset_name = "dataset";
    service.create_dataset_entry_with_name(dataset_name).await;

    register_asset_layer(
        &service,
        dataset_name,
        "shared_asset",
        asset_url,
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Error,
    )
    .await?;

    for on_duplicate in [
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Error,
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Overwrite,
        IfDuplicateBehavior::Skip,
    ] {
        let err = service
            .register_with_dataset(segment_layer_request(
                dataset_name,
                "shared_asset",
                &seg_url,
                on_duplicate,
            )?)
            .await
            .expect_err("registering a segment layer named like an asset layer should fail");
        assert_eq!(err.code(), tonic::Code::AlreadyExists, "{on_duplicate:?}");
        assert!(
            err.message().contains("layer class"),
            "error should mention the layer class conflict, got: {}",
            err.message()
        );
    }

    // A segment layer with a non-conflicting name still works,
    // and its new segment is seeded with the asset layer.
    service
        .register_with_dataset(segment_layer_request(
            dataset_name,
            "other_layer",
            &seg_url,
            IfDuplicateBehavior::Error,
        )?)
        .await?;

    assert_eq!(
        manifest_layer_names(&scan_manifest(&service, dataset_name).await?),
        ["other_layer", "shared_asset"],
        "the new segment should have its own layer plus the seeded asset layer"
    );
    Ok(())
}