Ralon
A file in your project says what AI agents may not touch:
# agent.lock
version: 1
protect:
- src/index.tsx
- src/auth.ts
- .env
- config/**
- .github/workflows/**
Then you start the agent through it:
$ ralon run -- claude
ralon: 5 paths locked via the mount backend
Inside that process — and every process it spawns, forever — those paths are
read-only to the kernel. Not a linter, not a hook the agent can talk its way
past, not a prompt it can forget. open() returns EROFS, rm returns
EACCES, and the agent gets on with the work it is allowed to do.
.gitignore → what Git must not track
agent.lock → what AI-controlled processes must not modify
Deliberately absent: no GUI, no account, no cloud service, no approval workflow, no dependency on Claude, Cursor, Codex, Gemini or any other tool. It is a binary, a config file, and two kernel features.
Install
$ cargo install ralon
The policy file is called agent.lock, not ralon.lock, on purpose: it is a
format, not a product. Anything could enforce it — this is one thing that does.
Or from a checkout:
$ cargo install --path .
The run command needs Linux. init, check and status work everywhere, so
policies stay checkable in CI and on a laptop of any kind.
Use
$ ralon init # write a starter agent.lock
$ ralon status # what is protected, and what this kernel can enforce
$ ralon check src/auth.ts # is this path protected? exits 1 if it is
$ ralon check # list everything the policy protects right now
$ ralon run --dry-run -- npm test # what would be locked, without locking it
$ ralon run -- claude # the real thing
ralon run replaces itself with your command, so the agent keeps its
terminal, its exit code, and its signals. There is no supervisor process to kill
and nothing to keep running in the background.
As a pre-write hook
check exits 1 when a path is protected, which is enough for any agent that
supports hooks. For Claude Code, in .claude/settings.json:
That is a courtesy, not a defence: it produces a clear error instead of a
confusing EACCES. The kernel is what actually stops the write, and it stops
sed -i, python, and git checkout too.
The policy file
version: 1 # required, must be 1
protect: # paths relative to agent.lock
- .env # a file
- config # a directory, and everything under it
- config/** # the same thing, spelled out
- src/*.ts # * stops at /
- "**/secrets.json" # ** does not
agent.lockprotects itself. An agent that can rewrite the policy has no policy.- Patterns are relative to the policy file.
.., absolute paths,~and!are rejected rather than quietly reinterpreted. - Any command finds the policy by walking up from the working directory, the
same way
gitfinds.git.
What the guarantee actually is
Under ralon run, for every protected path, in the sandboxed process and
all of its descendants:
| Attempt | Result |
|---|---|
write, append, truncate, cp over it |
denied |
| delete it, rename it away | denied |
| replace it by renaming another file over it | denied |
| create files inside a protected directory | denied |
| rename or remove a directory on the way to it | denied |
| read it | allowed |
| everything else in the project | untouched |
These are the cases in tests/enforcement.rs, which runs the attacks for real
against a real sandbox and then checks the file from outside it.
The restriction is inherited across fork and exec and cannot be dropped: a
Landlock domain is one-way, and the mount namespace is locked before your
command starts, so umount and bind-mount tricks fail from inside.
Where it stops
- Only what you launch. A policy protects the processes started through
ralon run. An agent started some other way is not restricted — the point is that you start it this way. - Only what exists. A protected path that is not on disk yet cannot be
bind-mounted.
statusandrunwarn about patterns matching nothing. (Under the landlock backend such paths cannot be created at all, which is stricter.) - Not against root. A process that can become root outside the namespace can undo anything. This defends against an agent doing something stupid or overreaching, not against an attacker with your password.
- Not a secret store. Protected files stay readable.
agent.locksays what must not change; if a file must not be read, do not put it in the project.
Backends
run picks the strongest backend the kernel offers. ralon status shows
what is available, and --backend mount|landlock pins the choice.
mount (default) — read-only bind mounts inside a user + mount namespace, locked by entering a second namespace so they cannot be undone. Every parent directory of a protected path is turned into a mount point too, so no directory on the way to it can be renamed or removed. Precise: nothing outside the protected paths behaves differently. Needs unprivileged user namespaces, which some hardened distros and container runtimes disable.
landlock — the kernel LSM, Linux 5.13+. Needs no namespaces, so it works
where user namespaces are blocked. Landlock rules are additive — a rule can only
grant more access than its parents, never less — so "everything except this
file" has to be expressed by granting every sibling along the way instead. The
consequence is visible and worth knowing: directories leading to a protected
path become create-restricted. With src/index.tsx protected, everything in
src/ and in the project root stays writable, but new files cannot be created
directly in either; new files inside tests/, docs/ or any other subtree are
fine. run --dry-run --backend landlock lists exactly which directories are
affected.
Exit codes
| Code | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 0 | fine |
| 1 | a path is protected (check), or the plan cannot be enforced (--dry-run) |
| 2 | error: no policy, bad policy, no usable backend, command failed to start |
Otherwise run exits with your command's own status.
Documentation
architecture.md— how it is built and why the two backends work the way they dosecurity.md— threat model, what is guaranteed, and the limitations that have been tested rather than assumedpublishing.md— release process
Development
$ cargo test # policy, matching and CLI behaviour, any platform
$ cargo test --test enforcement # real bypass attempts, Linux only
The enforcement tests need a kernel that provides at least one backend. In a
container, --security-opt seccomp=unconfined is usually what makes user
namespaces available; Landlock needs 5.13+ with the LSM enabled.
License
Copyright 2026 Ralon contributors.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. See LICENSE, or http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.
Unless you state otherwise, any contribution you intentionally submit for inclusion in this work is licensed under the same terms, per section 5 of the license.