pr4xis 0.22.0

Prove your domain is correct — ontology-driven rule enforcement with category theory, logical composition, and runtime state machines
Documentation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
//! Category and functor laws as first-class `Axiom` impls.
//!
//! # Laws are axioms (#168 / #169)
//!
//! Under Mac Lane (1971) CWM Ch. I §1, a category is defined by its
//! laws — identity and associativity hold as equations between
//! morphisms. In the computing setting (Barr & Wells 1999 CTCS §4
//! *sketches*; Spivak 2012 FDM §§2–3 *schema categories with path
//! equivalences*) those laws and any domain-specific equations are
//! verified uniformly — they are the same kind of thing.
//!
//! pr4xis follows Barr-Wells/Spivak: every law is an [`Axiom`] and
//! [`Axiom::verify`] returns a typed [`Verdict`] (proof or
//! counterexample, per Martin-Löf 1984). The prior `validate.rs`
//! module returned `Result<(), String>` — strings aren't proofs under
//! Martin-Löf, and the separate module privileged laws over axioms
//! with no ontological basis.
//!
//! # Use
//!
//! To verify a category's laws, compose them into an ontology's
//! [`crate::ontology::Ontology::axioms`] via [`category_law_axioms`], or verify them
//! directly:
//!
//! ```text
//! for law in category_law_axioms::<FooCategory>() {
//!     law.verify().unwrap_or_else(|c| panic!("{}", c.meta().name.as_str()));
//! }
//! ```
//!
//! Functor laws ([`functor_law_axioms`]) work the same way.
//!
//! Literature:
//! - Mac Lane (1971) *Categories for the Working Mathematician* Ch. I §1
//!   (category laws), Ch. II §1 (functor laws)
//! - Barr & Wells (1999) *Category Theory for Computing Science* §4
//!   (sketches: laws and axioms uniform)
//! - Spivak (2012) *Functorial Data Model* §§2–3 (schema categories
//!   with path equivalences)
//! - Martin-Löf (1984) *Intuitionistic Type Theory* (typed proofs /
//!   counterexamples)

use std::marker::PhantomData;

use super::arrow::Arrow;
use super::category::Category;
use super::entity::Concept;
use super::functor::Functor;
use crate::logic::axiom::Axiom;
use crate::logic::proof::{SimpleCounterexample, SimpleProof, Verdict};
use crate::ontology::meta::{Citation, Label, OntologyName};

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Category laws
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

/// Mac Lane (1971) CWM Ch. I §1: closure — whenever `compose(f, g)`
/// yields `Some(h)`, `h` must be in `morphisms()`.
///
/// Per OBO-RO partial composition (#166), `compose` may legitimately
/// return `None` for heterogeneous pairs with no declared rule. The
/// law is only asserted on the positive branch.
pub struct ClosureLaw<C: Category> {
    _marker: PhantomData<C>,
}

impl<C: Category> ClosureLaw<C> {
    pub fn new() -> Self {
        Self {
            _marker: PhantomData,
        }
    }
}

impl<C: Category> Default for ClosureLaw<C> {
    fn default() -> Self {
        Self::new()
    }
}

impl<C> Axiom for ClosureLaw<C>
where
    C: Category + 'static,
    C::Morphism: PartialEq + 'static,
{
    fn verify(&self) -> Verdict {
        let ms = C::morphisms();
        for f in &ms {
            for g in &ms {
                if f.target() != g.source() {
                    continue;
                }
                if let Some(h) = C::compose(f, g)
                    && !ms.contains(&h)
                {
                    return Err(Box::new(SimpleCounterexample::new(self.meta())));
                }
            }
        }
        Ok(Box::new(SimpleProof::new(self.meta())))
    }

    fn name(&self) -> OntologyName {
        OntologyName::new_static("ClosureLaw")
    }

    fn description(&self) -> Label {
        Label::new_static("compose(f, g) = Some(h) implies h ∈ morphisms()")
    }

    fn citation(&self) -> Citation {
        Citation::parse_static(
            "Mac Lane (1971) Categories for the Working Mathematician Ch. I §1; Barr & Wells (1999) CTCS §4 sketches",
        )
    }
}

/// Mac Lane (1971) CWM Ch. I §1: identity — `id_B ∘ f = f = f ∘ id_A`
/// for every morphism `f : A → B`.
pub struct IdentityLaw<C: Category> {
    _marker: PhantomData<C>,
}

impl<C: Category> IdentityLaw<C> {
    pub fn new() -> Self {
        Self {
            _marker: PhantomData,
        }
    }
}

impl<C: Category> Default for IdentityLaw<C> {
    fn default() -> Self {
        Self::new()
    }
}

impl<C> Axiom for IdentityLaw<C>
where
    C: Category + 'static,
    C::Morphism: PartialEq + 'static,
{
    fn verify(&self) -> Verdict {
        for obj in <C::Object as Concept>::variants() {
            let id = C::identity(&obj);
            for m in C::morphisms_from(&obj) {
                let left = C::compose(&id, &m);
                if left.as_ref() != Some(&m) {
                    return Err(Box::new(SimpleCounterexample::new(self.meta())));
                }
            }
            for m in C::morphisms_to(&obj) {
                let right = C::compose(&m, &id);
                if right.as_ref() != Some(&m) {
                    return Err(Box::new(SimpleCounterexample::new(self.meta())));
                }
            }
        }
        Ok(Box::new(SimpleProof::new(self.meta())))
    }

    fn name(&self) -> OntologyName {
        OntologyName::new_static("IdentityLaw")
    }

    fn description(&self) -> Label {
        Label::new_static("id_B ∘ f = f = f ∘ id_A for every morphism f: A → B")
    }

    fn citation(&self) -> Citation {
        Citation::parse_static("Mac Lane (1971) Categories for the Working Mathematician Ch. I §1")
    }
}

/// Mac Lane (1971) CWM Ch. I §1: associativity — for composable
/// triples `f, g, h`, `(h ∘ g) ∘ f = h ∘ (g ∘ f)`.
pub struct AssociativityLaw<C: Category> {
    _marker: PhantomData<C>,
}

impl<C: Category> AssociativityLaw<C> {
    pub fn new() -> Self {
        Self {
            _marker: PhantomData,
        }
    }
}

impl<C: Category> Default for AssociativityLaw<C> {
    fn default() -> Self {
        Self::new()
    }
}

impl<C> Axiom for AssociativityLaw<C>
where
    C: Category + 'static,
    C::Morphism: PartialEq + 'static,
{
    fn verify(&self) -> Verdict {
        let ms = C::morphisms();
        for f in &ms {
            for g in &ms {
                if f.target() != g.source() {
                    continue;
                }
                for h in &ms {
                    if g.target() != h.source() {
                        continue;
                    }
                    let fg = C::compose(f, g);
                    let gh = C::compose(g, h);
                    let left = fg.as_ref().and_then(|fg| C::compose(fg, h));
                    let right = gh.as_ref().and_then(|gh| C::compose(f, gh));
                    if left != right {
                        return Err(Box::new(SimpleCounterexample::new(self.meta())));
                    }
                }
            }
        }
        Ok(Box::new(SimpleProof::new(self.meta())))
    }

    fn name(&self) -> OntologyName {
        OntologyName::new_static("AssociativityLaw")
    }

    fn description(&self) -> Label {
        Label::new_static("(h ∘ g) ∘ f = h ∘ (g ∘ f) for composable triples")
    }

    fn citation(&self) -> Citation {
        Citation::parse_static("Mac Lane (1971) Categories for the Working Mathematician Ch. I §1")
    }
}

/// The three category laws as `Box<dyn Axiom>` instances, suitable
/// for splicing into [`crate::ontology::Ontology::axioms`].
pub fn category_law_axioms<C>() -> Vec<Box<dyn Axiom>>
where
    C: Category + 'static,
    C::Morphism: PartialEq + 'static,
{
    vec![
        Box::new(ClosureLaw::<C>::new()),
        Box::new(IdentityLaw::<C>::new()),
        Box::new(AssociativityLaw::<C>::new()),
    ]
}

/// Test convenience: verify every category law for `C`, panicking
/// with the counterexample's meta name on failure. Pattern-matches
/// the typed [`Verdict`] under the hood — core does not expose any
/// `bool`-returning shortcut.
pub fn assert_category_laws<C>()
where
    C: Category + 'static,
    C::Morphism: PartialEq + 'static,
{
    for law in category_law_axioms::<C>() {
        if let Err(c) = law.verify() {
            panic!("category law failed: {}", c.meta().name.as_str());
        }
    }
}

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Functor laws
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

/// Mac Lane (1971) CWM Ch. II §1: a functor preserves identities —
/// `F(id_A) = id_{F(A)}` for every source object A.
pub struct FunctorIdentityLaw<F: Functor> {
    _marker: PhantomData<F>,
}

impl<F: Functor> FunctorIdentityLaw<F> {
    pub fn new() -> Self {
        Self {
            _marker: PhantomData,
        }
    }
}

impl<F: Functor> Default for FunctorIdentityLaw<F> {
    fn default() -> Self {
        Self::new()
    }
}

impl<F> Axiom for FunctorIdentityLaw<F>
where
    F: Functor + 'static,
    <F::Target as Category>::Morphism: PartialEq + 'static,
{
    fn verify(&self) -> Verdict {
        for obj in <<F::Source as Category>::Object as Concept>::variants() {
            let id_source = F::Source::identity(&obj);
            let mapped_id = F::map_morphism(&id_source);
            let id_target = F::Target::identity(&F::map_object(&obj));
            if mapped_id != id_target {
                return Err(Box::new(SimpleCounterexample::new(self.meta())));
            }
        }
        Ok(Box::new(SimpleProof::new(self.meta())))
    }

    fn name(&self) -> OntologyName {
        OntologyName::new_static("FunctorIdentityLaw")
    }

    fn description(&self) -> Label {
        Label::new_static("F(id_A) = id_{F(A)} for every source object A")
    }

    fn citation(&self) -> Citation {
        Citation::parse_static("Mac Lane (1971) Categories for the Working Mathematician Ch. II §1")
    }
}

/// Mac Lane (1971) CWM Ch. II §1: a functor preserves composition —
/// `F(g ∘ f) = F(g) ∘ F(f)` for composable pairs.
pub struct FunctorCompositionLaw<F: Functor> {
    _marker: PhantomData<F>,
}

impl<F: Functor> FunctorCompositionLaw<F> {
    pub fn new() -> Self {
        Self {
            _marker: PhantomData,
        }
    }
}

impl<F: Functor> Default for FunctorCompositionLaw<F> {
    fn default() -> Self {
        Self::new()
    }
}

impl<F> Axiom for FunctorCompositionLaw<F>
where
    F: Functor + 'static,
    <F::Source as Category>::Morphism: PartialEq + 'static,
    <F::Target as Category>::Morphism: PartialEq + 'static,
{
    fn verify(&self) -> Verdict {
        let ms = F::Source::morphisms();
        for f in &ms {
            for g in &ms {
                if f.target() != g.source() {
                    continue;
                }
                if let Some(gf) = F::Source::compose(f, g) {
                    let f_mapped = F::map_morphism(&gf);
                    let composed = F::Target::compose(&F::map_morphism(f), &F::map_morphism(g));
                    if composed.as_ref() != Some(&f_mapped) {
                        return Err(Box::new(SimpleCounterexample::new(self.meta())));
                    }
                }
            }
        }
        Ok(Box::new(SimpleProof::new(self.meta())))
    }

    fn name(&self) -> OntologyName {
        OntologyName::new_static("FunctorCompositionLaw")
    }

    fn description(&self) -> Label {
        Label::new_static("F(g ∘ f) = F(g) ∘ F(f) for composable pairs")
    }

    fn citation(&self) -> Citation {
        Citation::parse_static("Mac Lane (1971) Categories for the Working Mathematician Ch. II §1")
    }
}

/// The two functor laws as `Box<dyn Axiom>` instances.
pub fn functor_law_axioms<F>() -> Vec<Box<dyn Axiom>>
where
    F: Functor + 'static,
    <F::Source as Category>::Morphism: PartialEq + 'static,
    <F::Target as Category>::Morphism: PartialEq + 'static,
{
    vec![
        Box::new(FunctorIdentityLaw::<F>::new()),
        Box::new(FunctorCompositionLaw::<F>::new()),
    ]
}

/// Test convenience: verify every functor law for `F`, panicking with
/// the counterexample's meta name on failure.
pub fn assert_functor_laws<F>()
where
    F: Functor + 'static,
    <F::Source as Category>::Morphism: PartialEq + 'static,
    <F::Target as Category>::Morphism: PartialEq + 'static,
{
    for law in functor_law_axioms::<F>() {
        if let Err(c) = law.verify() {
            panic!("functor law failed: {}", c.meta().name.as_str());
        }
    }
}