pmat 3.11.0

//! Property-based tests for quality check functions
//!
//! These tests verify invariants and properties of the quality checking system
//! using proptest for comprehensive coverage.

use crate::cli::analysis_utilities::{
    check_complexity, check_dead_code, check_duplicates, check_satd, QualityViolation,
};
use proptest::prelude::*;
use std::path::Path;
use tempfile::TempDir;
use tokio::runtime::Runtime;

/// Helper to create test files with specific content
fn create_test_file(dir: &Path, name: &str, content: &str) -> std::path::PathBuf {
    let file_path = dir.join(name);
    std::fs::write(&file_path, content).unwrap();
    file_path
}

proptest! {
    /// Property: Complexity violations only occur when cyclomatic complexity exceeds threshold
    #[test]
    fn prop_complexity_threshold_respected(
        threshold in 1u32..100u32,
        file_count in 1usize..10usize,
    ) {
        let rt = Runtime::new().unwrap();
        let temp_dir = TempDir::new().unwrap();

        // Create test files with varying complexity
        for i in 0..file_count {
            let complexity = i as u32 * 10; // 0, 10, 20, 30...
            let content = generate_code_with_complexity(complexity);
            create_test_file(temp_dir.path(), &format!("test{}.rs", i), &content);
        }

        let _ = rt.block_on(async {
            let violations = check_complexity(temp_dir.path(), threshold).await.unwrap();

            // Verify all violations are for files with complexity issues
            for violation in violations {
                assert_eq!(violation.check_type, "complexity");

                // Extract complexity from message
                if let Some(complexity_str) = violation.message
                    .split("complexity ")
                    .nth(1)
                    .and_then(|s| s.split(' ').next())
                    .and_then(|s| s.parse::<u32>().ok()) {
                    // Warnings are for complexity > (threshold - 2) but <= threshold
                    // Errors are for complexity > threshold
                    if violation.severity == "warning" {
                        let warn_threshold = threshold.saturating_sub(2).max(1);
                        prop_assert!(complexity_str > warn_threshold);
                        prop_assert!(complexity_str <= threshold);
                    } else if violation.severity == "error" {
                        prop_assert!(complexity_str > threshold);
                    } else {
                        panic!("Unexpected severity: {}", violation.severity);
                    }
                }
            }
            Ok(())
        });
    }

    /// Property: Dead code percentage calculations are accurate
    #[test]
    fn prop_dead_code_percentage_accurate(
        max_percentage in 0.0..50.0,
        total_functions in 10usize..100usize,
        dead_ratio in 0.0..0.5f64,
    ) {
        let rt = Runtime::new().unwrap();
        let temp_dir = TempDir::new().unwrap();

        // Create a Rust file with known dead/live function ratio
        let dead_count = (total_functions as f64 * dead_ratio) as usize;
        let mut content = String::new();

        // Add live functions
        for i in 0..(total_functions - dead_count) {
            content.push_str(&format!("pub fn live_func_{}() {{ println!(\"live\"); }}\n", i));
        }

        // Add dead functions (private, prefixed with _)
        for i in 0..dead_count {
            content.push_str(&format!("fn _dead_func_{}() {{ println!(\"dead\"); }}\n", i));
        }

        create_test_file(temp_dir.path(), "lib.rs", &content);

        let _ = rt.block_on(async {
            let violations = check_dead_code(temp_dir.path(), max_percentage).await.unwrap();

            // Property: Violations occur only when dead code exceeds threshold
            let expected_percentage = (dead_count as f64 / total_functions as f64) * 100.0;
            if expected_percentage > max_percentage {
                prop_assert!(!violations.is_empty(),
                    "Expected violations when dead code {}% > max {}%",
                    expected_percentage, max_percentage);
            }
            Ok(())
        });
    }

    /// Property: SATD detection finds all and only valid patterns
    #[test]
    fn prop_satd_detection_complete_and_sound(
        satd_types in prop::collection::vec(
            prop_oneof![
                Just("TODO"),
                Just("FIXME"),
                Just("HACK"),
                Just("XXX"),
                Just("BUG"),
                Just("REFACTOR"),
            ],
            0..10
        ),
        descriptions in prop::collection::vec("[a-zA-Z0-9 ]{1,50}", 0..10),
    ) {
        let rt = Runtime::new().unwrap();
        let temp_dir = TempDir::new().unwrap();

        // Create file with known SATD comments
        let mut content = String::new();
        let expected_count = satd_types.len().min(descriptions.len());

        for i in 0..expected_count {
            content.push_str(&format!("// {}: {}\n", satd_types[i], descriptions[i]));
            content.push_str("fn some_function() {}\n\n");
        }

        // Add some non-SATD comments
        content.push_str("// This is a regular comment\n");
        content.push_str("// Another normal comment without debt markers\n");

        create_test_file(temp_dir.path(), "test.rs", &content);

        let _ = rt.block_on(async {
            let violations = check_satd(temp_dir.path()).await.unwrap();

            // Property: Number of violations matches number of SATD comments
            prop_assert_eq!(violations.len(), expected_count);

            // Property: All violations are SATD type with line numbers
            for violation in &violations {
                prop_assert_eq!(&violation.check_type, "satd");
                prop_assert!(violation.line.is_some());
                prop_assert!(violation.severity == "warning" || violation.severity == "error");
            }
            Ok(())
        });
    }

    /// Property: Duplicate detection is symmetric and transitive
    #[test]
    fn prop_duplicate_detection_properties(
        file_contents in prop::collection::vec(
            "[a-zA-Z0-9\n ]{50,200}", // Generate code-like content
            2..10
        ),
        duplicate_indices in prop::collection::vec(0usize..10usize, 0..5),
    ) {
        let rt = Runtime::new().unwrap();
        let temp_dir = TempDir::new().unwrap();

        // Create files, some with duplicate content
        let mut duplicate_groups = std::collections::HashMap::new();

        for (i, content) in file_contents.iter().enumerate() {
            let file_content = if duplicate_indices.contains(&i) && i > 0 {
                // Make this a duplicate of the first file
                duplicate_groups.entry(0).or_insert_with(Vec::new).push(i);
                &file_contents[0]
            } else {
                duplicate_groups.entry(i).or_insert_with(Vec::new);
                content
            };

            create_test_file(temp_dir.path(), &format!("file{}.rs", i), file_content);
        }

        let _ = rt.block_on(async {
            let violations = check_duplicates(temp_dir.path()).await.unwrap();

            // Property: Duplicates are detected symmetrically
            let mut violation_pairs = std::collections::HashSet::new();
            for violation in &violations {
                violation_pairs.insert(violation.file.clone());
            }

            // If A is duplicate of B, then B should be duplicate of A
            for violation in &violations {
                if let Some(other_files) = extract_files_from_duplicate_message(&violation.message) {
                    for other_file in other_files {
                        prop_assert!(
                            violation_pairs.contains(&other_file),
                            "Symmetry violated: {} marked as duplicate but {} is not",
                            violation.file, other_file
                        );
                    }
                }
            }
            Ok(())
        });
    }
}

/// Helper to generate code with specific cyclomatic complexity
fn generate_code_with_complexity(target_complexity: u32) -> String {
    let mut code = String::from("fn complex_function() {\n");

    // Each if statement adds 1 to cyclomatic complexity
    for i in 0..target_complexity {
        code.push_str(&format!("    if condition_{} {{\n", i));
        code.push_str(&format!("        println!(\"branch {}\");\n", i));
        code.push_str("    }\n");
    }

    code.push_str("}\n");
    code
}

/// Extract file names from duplicate violation message
fn extract_files_from_duplicate_message(message: &str) -> Option<Vec<String>> {
    message
        .split("found in: ")
        .nth(1)
        .map(|files_part| files_part.split(", ").map(String::from).collect())
}

#[cfg_attr(coverage_nightly, coverage(off))]
#[cfg(test)]
mod additional_property_tests {
    use super::*;

    proptest! {
        /// Property: Quality violations have consistent structure
        #[test]
        fn prop_violation_structure_valid(
            check_type in "[a-z_]+",
            severity in prop_oneof![Just("error"), Just("warning"), Just("info")],
            file_path in "[a-zA-Z0-9/_]+\\.rs",
            line in prop::option::of(1usize..10000usize),
            message in "[a-zA-Z0-9 :,.-]+",
        ) {
            let violation = QualityViolation::new(
                check_type.clone(),
                severity.to_string(),
                file_path.clone(),
                line,
                message.clone(),
            );

            // Properties that should always hold
            prop_assert!(!violation.check_type.is_empty());
            prop_assert!(!violation.severity.is_empty());
            prop_assert!(!violation.file.is_empty());
            prop_assert!(!violation.message.is_empty());

            // Severity should be one of the valid values
            prop_assert!(
                ["error", "warning", "info"].contains(&violation.severity.as_str()),
                "Invalid severity: {}", violation.severity
            );
        }
    }
}

/// Unit tests for quality gate check display and performance metrics functionality
/// These tests specifically verify the fixes for issues #30 and #31.
#[cfg_attr(coverage_nightly, coverage(off))]
#[cfg(test)]
mod unit_tests {
    use super::*;
    use crate::cli::QualityCheckType;

    /// Test that quality check types are properly defined (Issue #30 support)
    #[test]
    fn test_quality_check_types_comprehensive() {
        // Test that all check types can be created and cloned
        let all_checks = vec![
            QualityCheckType::All,
            QualityCheckType::Complexity,
            QualityCheckType::DeadCode,
            QualityCheckType::Satd,
            QualityCheckType::Security,
            QualityCheckType::Entropy,
            QualityCheckType::Duplicates,
            QualityCheckType::Coverage,
            QualityCheckType::Sections,
            QualityCheckType::Provability,
        ];

        // All check types should be valid
        assert_eq!(
            all_checks.len(),
            10,
            "Should have exactly 10 check types defined"
        );

        // Each check type should be cloneable and comparable
        for check_type in &all_checks {
            let cloned = check_type.clone();
            assert_eq!(
                check_type, &cloned,
                "Check type should be cloneable and comparable"
            );
        }
    }

    /// Test check type string representation consistency (Issue #30)
    #[test]
    fn test_check_type_debug_format() {
        let complexity_check = QualityCheckType::Complexity;
        let debug_string = format!("{:?}", complexity_check);

        // Debug format should contain the type name
        assert!(
            debug_string.contains("Complexity"),
            "Debug format should contain type name"
        );
        assert!(!debug_string.is_empty(), "Debug format should not be empty");
    }

    /// Test performance metrics calculation and display (Issue #31)
    #[test]
    fn test_performance_metrics_calculation() {
        use std::time::Duration;

        // Test timing calculation
        let start_time = std::time::Instant::now();
        std::thread::sleep(Duration::from_millis(10)); // Small delay for testing
        let elapsed = start_time.elapsed();

        // Basic properties of elapsed time
        assert!(
            elapsed.as_millis() >= 10,
            "Should have elapsed at least 10ms"
        );
        assert!(
            elapsed.as_millis() < 1000,
            "Should have elapsed less than 1 second"
        );

        // Test performance metrics formatting
        let num_checks = 5;
        let avg_time = elapsed.as_secs_f64() / num_checks as f64;

        assert!(avg_time > 0.0, "Average time should be positive");
        assert!(avg_time.is_finite(), "Average time should be finite");
    }

    /// Test performance metrics display format (Issue #31)
    #[test]
    fn test_performance_metrics_display_format() {
        use std::time::Duration;

        let total_time = Duration::from_millis(1500); // 1.5 seconds
        let num_checks = 3;
        let avg_time = total_time.as_secs_f64() / num_checks as f64;

        // Format performance output (similar to what's in quality gate)
        let perf_output = format!(
            "⏱️  Performance Metrics:\n  Total execution time: {:.2}s\n  Checks performed: {}\n  Average time per check: {:.2}s",
            total_time.as_secs_f64(),
            num_checks,
            avg_time
        );

        // Verify format contains expected elements
        assert!(perf_output.contains("Performance Metrics"));
        assert!(perf_output.contains("Total execution time: 1.50s"));
        assert!(perf_output.contains("Checks performed: 3"));
        assert!(perf_output.contains("Average time per check: 0.50s"));
    }

    /// Test that performance flag integration works as expected
    #[test]
    fn test_performance_flag_integration() {
        // Test with performance enabled
        let perf_enabled = true;
        let should_show_metrics = perf_enabled;
        assert!(
            should_show_metrics,
            "Performance metrics should be shown when perf flag is enabled"
        );

        // Test with performance disabled
        let perf_disabled = false;
        let should_show_metrics = perf_disabled;
        assert!(
            !should_show_metrics,
            "Performance metrics should not be shown when perf flag is disabled"
        );
    }

    /// Test check name generation consistency (supporting Issue #30)
    #[test]
    fn test_check_type_consistency() {
        // Check that the same check type always produces the same results
        let complexity_check1 = QualityCheckType::Complexity;
        let complexity_check2 = QualityCheckType::Complexity;

        // Should be equal
        assert_eq!(
            complexity_check1, complexity_check2,
            "Same check types should be equal"
        );

        // Should have same debug representation
        assert_eq!(
            format!("{:?}", complexity_check1),
            format!("{:?}", complexity_check2),
            "Same check types should have identical debug representation"
        );
    }

    /// Test violation detection with complexity check
    #[test]
    fn test_complexity_violation_detection() {
        let rt = Runtime::new().unwrap();
        let temp_dir = TempDir::new().unwrap();

        // Create a test file with complexity exceeding built-in threshold (cyclomatic > 30).
        // check_complexity() reads thresholds from config service, not the passed parameter.
        // Use if-else chains (not match arms) since each `if` adds 1 to cyclomatic complexity.
        let branches: String = (0..35)
            .map(|i| format!("    if a == {i} {{ return {i}; }}\n"))
            .collect();
        let code = format!("fn f(a: i32) -> i32 {{\n{branches}    0\n}}");
        let _test_file = create_test_file(temp_dir.path(), "test.rs", &code);

        rt.block_on(async {
            let complexity_violations = check_complexity(temp_dir.path(), 5).await.unwrap();
            // 35 if-branches → cyclomatic ~36 > threshold 30
            assert!(
                !complexity_violations.is_empty(),
                "Should detect complexity violations when cyclomatic > 30"
            );

            for violation in &complexity_violations {
                assert_eq!(violation.check_type, "complexity");
                assert!(!violation.message.is_empty());
                assert!(!violation.file.is_empty());
            }
        });
    }
}