1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
//! The RSI prompt must route capability gaps to a proposal (#811).
//!
//! `rsi_propose` was registered and documented, but the word "propose" appeared
//! nowhere in the agent's own workflow, so it was never called and the
//! proposal inbox stayed empty.
//!
//! Worse, the triage step correctly identified capability gaps, the exact case
//! proposals exist for, and then told the agent to drop them. A system that can
//! only write rules recognises every capability gap, categorises it, and
//! discards it.
//!
//! These pin the routing so it cannot be edited away by a later prompt
//! compression pass.
use crate::brain::rsi::RSI_AGENT_PROMPT;
#[test]
fn the_workflow_mentions_proposing() {
// A tool the workflow never names is a tool that does not get used.
assert!(
RSI_AGENT_PROMPT.contains("rsi_propose"),
"the prompt must name the proposal tool in its own workflow"
);
}
#[test]
fn a_capability_gap_is_not_discarded() {
// The old triage ended "a rule won't fix it and only adds noise — leave
// it", which threw away precisely the findings proposals are for.
assert!(
!RSI_AGENT_PROMPT.contains("only adds noise — leave it"),
"a capability gap must route to a proposal, not be dropped"
);
assert!(
RSI_AGENT_PROMPT.contains("propose the missing capability"),
"the triage must send capability gaps to rsi_propose"
);
}
#[test]
fn the_split_between_the_two_actions_is_stated() {
// Naming the tool is not enough; the agent has to know which situation
// each one answers.
assert!(
RSI_AGENT_PROMPT.contains("Guidance vs Capability"),
"{RSI_AGENT_PROMPT}"
);
assert!(
RSI_AGENT_PROMPT.contains("self_improve"),
"the guidance half must still be named"
);
}
#[test]
fn proposals_are_described_as_review_not_install() {
// A proposal that reads as an applied change would make the agent report
// work it has not done.
assert!(
RSI_AGENT_PROMPT.contains("NOT installed"),
"the prompt must be explicit that proposing is not applying"
);
}
#[test]
fn proposing_keeps_the_repeated_pattern_bar() {
// Without this the fix trades an empty inbox for a noisy one, which is no
// more useful.
assert!(
RSI_AGENT_PROMPT.contains("REPEATED pattern"),
"proposals must need more evidence than a single occurrence"
);
}