Description
Onsen provides a Pool for objects. Allocation from this Pool is faster and offers better locality than the standard allocator in most cases.
Details
The first block in a Pool is size [Entry<T>; E], when a Pool runs out of storage it
allocates a new block from the system which is twice as big as the previous block. E should
be be optimized for the intended use. That is blocks should become close or equal to multiples
of cache lines, pages, huge pages, whatever makes most sense. Memory allocation happens only
when necessary, creating a pool is a cheap operation.
Slots and safety
Allocating from a Pool returns Slot handles. These are lightweight abstractions to memory addresses, they do not keep a relation to the Pool they are allocated from. The rationale for this design is to make them usable in a VM that uses NaN tagging.
Because of this Slots need to be handled with care and certain contracts need to be enforced. The library provides some help to ensure correctness. The more expensive checks are only run in debug mode.
- Slots must be given back to the Pool they originate from.
- This is asserted only in debug mode because it is more expensive.
- There is
pool.leak()which drops a pool while leaking its memory blocks. This can be used when one will never try to free memory obtained from that Pool.
- Slots must not outlive the Pool they are allocated from.
- When a Pool gets dropped while it still has live allocations it will panic in debug mode.
- When a Pool with live allocations gets dropped in release mode it leaks its memory. This is unfortunate but ensures memory safety of the program.
- Slots must be freed only once.
- This is always asserted.
- References obtained from Slots must not outlive the freeing of the Slot.
- This is the main reason that makes the Slot freeing functions unsafe. There is no way for a Pool to know if references are still in use. One must provide a safe abstraction around referenced to enforce this.
- Slots can hold uninitialized data, then no references or Pins must be taken from them.
- This is always asserted.
- Obtaining a
&mut Tfrom a Slot is mutually exclusive to obtaining aPin<&mut T>.- This is always asserted.
- Any mutable reference obtained while initializing an uninitialized Slot must be dropped
before calling
slot.assume_init(). This would break the Pin guarantees.- This is part of the reason that
slot.get_uninit()andslot.assume_init()are unsafe and must be enforced by the programmer.
- This is part of the reason that
- All the above applies to the NaN-Tag facilities
slot.into_u64(),Slot::from_u64()andSlot::from_u64_masked()