omeco 0.2.4

Tensor network contraction order optimization
Documentation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
//! # omeco - Tensor Network Contraction Order Optimization
//!
//! A Rust library for optimizing tensor network contraction orders, ported from
//! the Julia package [OMEinsumContractionOrders.jl](https://github.com/TensorBFS/OMEinsumContractionOrders.jl).
//!
//! ## What is a Tensor Network?
//!
//! A *tensor network* represents multilinear transformations as hypergraphs.
//! Arrays (tensors) are nodes, and shared indices are hyperedges connecting them.
//! To *contract* a tensor network means evaluating the transformation by performing
//! a sequence of pairwise tensor operations.
//!
//! The computational cost—both time and memory—depends critically on the order
//! of these operations. A specific ordering is called a *contraction order*, and
//! finding an efficient one is *contraction order optimization*.
//!
//! This framework appears across many domains: *einsum* notation in numerical
//! computing, *factor graphs* in probabilistic inference, and *junction trees*
//! in graphical models. Applications include quantum circuit simulation,
//! quantum error correction, neural network compression, and combinatorial optimization.
//!
//! Finding the optimal contraction order is NP-complete, but good heuristics
//! can find near-optimal solutions quickly.
//!
//! ## Features
//!
//! This crate provides two main features:
//!
//! 1. **Contraction Order Optimization** — Find efficient orderings that minimize
//!    time and/or space complexity
//! 2. **Slicing** — Trade time for space by looping over selected indices
//!
//! ### Feature 1: Contraction Order Optimization
//!
//! A contraction order is represented as a binary tree where leaves are input
//! tensors and internal nodes are intermediate results. The optimizer searches
//! for trees that minimize a cost function balancing multiple objectives:
//!
//! - **Time complexity (tc)**: Total FLOP count (log2 scale)
//! - **Space complexity (sc)**: Maximum intermediate tensor size (log2 scale)
//! - **Read-write complexity (rwc)**: Total memory I/O (log2 scale)
//!
//! ```rust
//! use omeco::{EinCode, GreedyMethod, contraction_complexity, optimize_code, uniform_size_dict};
//!
//! // Matrix chain: A[i,j] × B[j,k] × C[k,l] → D[i,l]
//! let code = EinCode::new(
//!     vec![vec!['i', 'j'], vec!['j', 'k'], vec!['k', 'l']],
//!     vec!['i', 'l'],
//! );
//! let sizes = uniform_size_dict(&code, 16);
//!
//! let optimized = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default())
//!     .expect("optimizer failed");
//! let metrics = contraction_complexity(&optimized, &sizes, &code.ixs);
//! println!("time: 2^{:.2}", metrics.tc);
//! println!("space: 2^{:.2}", metrics.sc);
//! ```
//!
//! **Available optimizers:**
//!
//! | Optimizer | Description |
//! |-----------|-------------|
//! | [`GreedyMethod`] | Fast O(n² log n) greedy heuristic |
//! | [`TreeSA`] | Simulated annealing for higher-quality solutions |
//!
//! Use [`GreedyMethod`] when you need speed; use [`TreeSA`] when contraction
//! cost dominates and you can afford extra search time.
//!
//! ### Feature 2: Slicing
//!
//! *Slicing* trades time complexity for reduced space complexity by explicitly
//! looping over a subset of tensor indices. This is useful when the optimal
//! contraction order still exceeds available memory.
//!
//! For example, slicing index `j` with dimension 64 means running 64 smaller
//! contractions and summing the results, reducing peak memory at the cost of
//! more total work.
//!
//! ```rust
//! use omeco::{EinCode, GreedyMethod, SlicedEinsum, optimize_code, sliced_complexity, uniform_size_dict};
//!
//! let code = EinCode::new(
//!     vec![vec!['i', 'j'], vec!['j', 'k']],
//!     vec!['i', 'k'],
//! );
//! let sizes = uniform_size_dict(&code, 64);
//!
//! let optimized = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default())
//!     .expect("optimizer failed");
//!
//! // Slice over index 'j' to reduce memory
//! let sliced = SlicedEinsum::new(vec!['j'], optimized);
//! let metrics = sliced_complexity(&sliced, &sizes, &code.ixs);
//! println!("sliced space: 2^{:.2}", metrics.sc);
//! ```
//!
//! ## Algorithm Details
//!
//! ### GreedyMethod
//!
//! Repeatedly contracts the tensor pair with the lowest cost:
//!
//! ```text
//! loss = size(output) - α × (size(input1) + size(input2))
//! ```
//!
//! - `alpha` (0.0–1.0): Balances output size vs input size reduction
//! - `temperature`: Enables stochastic selection via Boltzmann sampling (0 = deterministic)
//!
//! ### TreeSA
//!
//! Simulated annealing on contraction trees. Starts from an initial tree,
//! applies local rewrites, and accepts/rejects via Metropolis criterion.
//! Runs multiple trials in parallel using rayon.
//!
//! The scoring function balances objectives:
//!
//! ```text
//! score = w_t × 2^tc + w_rw × 2^rwc + w_s × max(0, 2^sc - 2^sc_target)
//! ```
//!
//! - `betas`: Inverse temperature schedule
//! - `ntrials`: Parallel trials (control threads via `RAYON_NUM_THREADS`)
//! - `niters`: Iterations per temperature level
//! - `score`: [`ScoreFunction`] with weights and space target

pub mod complexity;
pub mod eincode;
pub mod expr_tree;
pub mod greedy;
pub mod incidence_list;
pub mod json;
pub mod label;
pub mod score;
pub mod simplifier;
pub mod slicer;
pub mod treesa;
pub mod utils;

#[cfg(test)]
pub mod test_utils;

// Re-export main types
pub use complexity::{
    eincode_complexity, flop, nested_complexity, nested_flop, peak_memory, sliced_complexity,
    ContractionComplexity,
};
pub use eincode::{log2_size_dict, uniform_size_dict, EinCode, NestedEinsum, SlicedEinsum};
pub use greedy::{optimize_greedy, ContractionTree, GreedyMethod, GreedyResult};
pub use label::Label;
pub use score::ScoreFunction;
pub use slicer::{slice_code, CodeSlicer, Slicer, TreeSASlicer};
pub use treesa::{optimize_treesa, Initializer, TreeSA};

use std::collections::HashMap;

/// Trait for contraction order optimizers.
pub trait CodeOptimizer {
    /// Optimize the contraction order for an EinCode.
    fn optimize<L: Label>(
        &self,
        code: &EinCode<L>,
        size_dict: &HashMap<L, usize>,
    ) -> Option<NestedEinsum<L>>;
}

impl CodeOptimizer for GreedyMethod {
    fn optimize<L: Label>(
        &self,
        code: &EinCode<L>,
        size_dict: &HashMap<L, usize>,
    ) -> Option<NestedEinsum<L>> {
        optimize_greedy(code, size_dict, self)
    }
}

impl CodeOptimizer for TreeSA {
    fn optimize<L: Label>(
        &self,
        code: &EinCode<L>,
        size_dict: &HashMap<L, usize>,
    ) -> Option<NestedEinsum<L>> {
        optimize_treesa(code, size_dict, self)
    }
}

/// Optimize the contraction order for an EinCode using the specified optimizer.
///
/// # Example
///
/// ```rust
/// use omeco::{EinCode, optimize_code, GreedyMethod};
/// use std::collections::HashMap;
///
/// let code = EinCode::new(
///     vec![vec!['i', 'j'], vec!['j', 'k']],
///     vec!['i', 'k']
/// );
///
/// let mut sizes = HashMap::new();
/// sizes.insert('i', 10);
/// sizes.insert('j', 20);
/// sizes.insert('k', 10);
///
/// let optimized = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
/// assert!(optimized.is_some());
/// ```
pub fn optimize_code<L: Label, O: CodeOptimizer>(
    code: &EinCode<L>,
    size_dict: &HashMap<L, usize>,
    optimizer: &O,
) -> Option<NestedEinsum<L>> {
    optimizer.optimize(code, size_dict)
}

/// Compute the contraction complexity of an optimized NestedEinsum.
///
/// This is a convenience function that wraps [`nested_complexity`].
pub fn contraction_complexity<L: Label>(
    code: &NestedEinsum<L>,
    size_dict: &HashMap<L, usize>,
    original_ixs: &[Vec<L>],
) -> ContractionComplexity {
    nested_complexity(code, size_dict, original_ixs)
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn test_optimize_code_greedy() {
        let code = EinCode::new(
            vec![vec!['i', 'j'], vec!['j', 'k'], vec!['k', 'l']],
            vec!['i', 'l'],
        );

        let mut sizes = HashMap::new();
        sizes.insert('i', 4);
        sizes.insert('j', 8);
        sizes.insert('k', 8);
        sizes.insert('l', 4);

        let result = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(result.is_some());

        let nested = result.unwrap();
        assert!(nested.is_binary());
        assert_eq!(nested.leaf_count(), 3);
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_optimize_code_treesa() {
        let code = EinCode::new(vec![vec!['i', 'j'], vec!['j', 'k']], vec!['i', 'k']);

        let mut sizes = HashMap::new();
        sizes.insert('i', 4);
        sizes.insert('j', 8);
        sizes.insert('k', 4);

        let result = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &TreeSA::fast());
        assert!(result.is_some());

        let nested = result.unwrap();
        assert!(nested.is_binary());
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_contraction_complexity_wrapper() {
        let code = EinCode::new(vec![vec!['i', 'j'], vec!['j', 'k']], vec!['i', 'k']);

        let mut sizes = HashMap::new();
        sizes.insert('i', 4);
        sizes.insert('j', 8);
        sizes.insert('k', 4);

        let result = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default()).unwrap();
        let complexity = contraction_complexity(&result, &sizes, &code.ixs);

        assert!(complexity.tc > 0.0);
        assert!(complexity.sc > 0.0);
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_single_tensor() {
        let code = EinCode::new(vec![vec!['i', 'j']], vec!['i', 'j']);

        let mut sizes = HashMap::new();
        sizes.insert('i', 4);
        sizes.insert('j', 4);

        let result = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(result.is_some());
        assert!(result.unwrap().is_leaf());
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_trace() {
        let code = EinCode::new(
            vec![vec!['i', 'j'], vec!['j', 'i']],
            vec![], // Trace - no output
        );

        let mut sizes = HashMap::new();
        sizes.insert('i', 4);
        sizes.insert('j', 4);

        let result = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(result.is_some());
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_empty_code() {
        let code: EinCode<char> = EinCode::new(vec![], vec![]);
        let sizes: HashMap<char, usize> = HashMap::new();

        let result = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(result.is_none());
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_optimize_code_with_slicing() {
        use crate::slicer::{slice_code, TreeSASlicer};

        let code = EinCode::new(
            vec![vec!['i', 'j'], vec!['j', 'k'], vec!['k', 'l']],
            vec!['i', 'l'],
        );

        let mut sizes = HashMap::new();
        sizes.insert('i', 4);
        sizes.insert('j', 8);
        sizes.insert('k', 8);
        sizes.insert('l', 4);

        // First optimize
        let nested = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default()).unwrap();

        // Then slice
        let slicer = TreeSASlicer::fast();
        let sliced = slice_code(&nested, &sizes, &slicer, &code.ixs);

        // Verify sliced result exists (may or may not slice depending on sizes)
        assert!(sliced.is_some());
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_contraction_complexity_deep_tree() {
        let code = EinCode::new(
            vec![
                vec!['a', 'b'],
                vec!['b', 'c'],
                vec!['c', 'd'],
                vec!['d', 'e'],
            ],
            vec!['a', 'e'],
        );

        let mut sizes = HashMap::new();
        sizes.insert('a', 2);
        sizes.insert('b', 2);
        sizes.insert('c', 2);
        sizes.insert('d', 2);
        sizes.insert('e', 2);

        let nested = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default()).unwrap();
        let complexity = contraction_complexity(&nested, &sizes, &code.ixs);

        // Deep tree should have multiple contractions
        assert!(complexity.tc > 0.0);
        assert!(complexity.sc > 0.0);
        assert!(complexity.rwc > 0.0);
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_optimize_code_treesa_with_path_decomp() {
        let code = EinCode::new(
            vec![vec!['i', 'j'], vec!['j', 'k'], vec!['k', 'l']],
            vec!['i', 'l'],
        );

        let mut sizes = HashMap::new();
        sizes.insert('i', 4);
        sizes.insert('j', 8);
        sizes.insert('k', 8);
        sizes.insert('l', 4);

        let result = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &TreeSA::path());
        assert!(result.is_some());

        let nested = result.unwrap();
        // Path decomposition should produce a valid tree
        assert!(nested.is_binary() || nested.is_leaf());
    }
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod issue_13_tests {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn test_issue_13_greedy_scalar_output() {
        // Issue #13: optimize_code ignores final output indices (iy) in NestedEinsum
        // A[i,j] @ B[j,k] -> scalar (empty iy)
        let code = EinCode::new(vec![vec![0usize, 1], vec![1usize, 2]], vec![]);

        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = [(0, 2), (1, 2), (2, 2)].into();
        let optimizer = GreedyMethod::default();

        let tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &optimizer).expect("should optimize");

        match &tree {
            NestedEinsum::Node { eins, .. } => {
                assert_eq!(
                    eins.iy, code.iy,
                    "Root node's iy should match requested output. Got {:?}, expected {:?}",
                    eins.iy, code.iy
                );
            }
            NestedEinsum::Leaf { .. } => {
                panic!("Multi-tensor operation should not return Leaf");
            }
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_issue_13_greedy_partial_output() {
        // A[i,j] @ B[j,k] -> [i] (only keep first index)
        let code = EinCode::new(vec![vec![0usize, 1], vec![1usize, 2]], vec![0usize]);

        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = [(0, 2), (1, 2), (2, 2)].into();
        let optimizer = GreedyMethod::default();

        let tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &optimizer).expect("should optimize");

        match &tree {
            NestedEinsum::Node { eins, .. } => {
                assert_eq!(
                    eins.iy, code.iy,
                    "Root node's iy should match requested output. Got {:?}, expected {:?}",
                    eins.iy, code.iy
                );
            }
            NestedEinsum::Leaf { .. } => {
                panic!("Multi-tensor operation should not return Leaf");
            }
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_issue_13_treesa_scalar_output() {
        // Issue #13: TreeSA should also respect final output indices
        let code = EinCode::new(vec![vec![0usize, 1], vec![1usize, 2]], vec![]);

        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = [(0, 2), (1, 2), (2, 2)].into();
        let optimizer = TreeSA::fast();

        let tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &optimizer).expect("should optimize");

        match &tree {
            NestedEinsum::Node { eins, .. } => {
                assert_eq!(
                    eins.iy, code.iy,
                    "TreeSA root node's iy should match requested output. Got {:?}, expected {:?}",
                    eins.iy, code.iy
                );
            }
            NestedEinsum::Leaf { .. } => {
                panic!("Multi-tensor operation should not return Leaf");
            }
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_issue_13_treesa_partial_output() {
        // A[i,j] @ B[j,k] -> [k] (only keep last index)
        let code = EinCode::new(vec![vec![0usize, 1], vec![1usize, 2]], vec![2usize]);

        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = [(0, 2), (1, 2), (2, 2)].into();
        let optimizer = TreeSA::fast();

        let tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &optimizer).expect("should optimize");

        match &tree {
            NestedEinsum::Node { eins, .. } => {
                assert_eq!(
                    eins.iy, code.iy,
                    "TreeSA root node's iy should match requested output. Got {:?}, expected {:?}",
                    eins.iy, code.iy
                );
            }
            NestedEinsum::Leaf { .. } => {
                panic!("Multi-tensor operation should not return Leaf");
            }
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_issue_13_greedy_chain_scalar_output() {
        // 3 tensors: A[i,j] @ B[j,k] @ C[k,l] -> scalar
        // This exercises the level > 0 branch for intermediate nodes
        let code = EinCode::new(
            vec![vec![0usize, 1], vec![1usize, 2], vec![2usize, 3]],
            vec![],
        );

        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = [(0, 2), (1, 2), (2, 2), (3, 2)].into();
        let optimizer = GreedyMethod::default();

        let tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &optimizer).expect("should optimize");

        // Verify root has requested output
        match &tree {
            NestedEinsum::Node { eins, .. } => {
                assert_eq!(
                    eins.iy, code.iy,
                    "Root node's iy should be empty (scalar). Got {:?}",
                    eins.iy
                );
            }
            NestedEinsum::Leaf { .. } => {
                panic!("3-tensor operation should not return Leaf");
            }
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_issue_13_greedy_chain_partial_output() {
        // 3 tensors: A[i,j] @ B[j,k] @ C[k,l] -> [i] (only first index)
        let code = EinCode::new(
            vec![vec![0usize, 1], vec![1usize, 2], vec![2usize, 3]],
            vec![0usize],
        );

        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = [(0, 2), (1, 2), (2, 2), (3, 2)].into();
        let optimizer = GreedyMethod::default();

        let tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &optimizer).expect("should optimize");

        match &tree {
            NestedEinsum::Node { eins, .. } => {
                assert_eq!(
                    eins.iy, code.iy,
                    "Root node's iy should be [0]. Got {:?}",
                    eins.iy
                );
            }
            NestedEinsum::Leaf { .. } => {
                panic!("3-tensor operation should not return Leaf");
            }
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_issue_13_treesa_chain_scalar_output() {
        // 3 tensors with TreeSA
        let code = EinCode::new(
            vec![vec![0usize, 1], vec![1usize, 2], vec![2usize, 3]],
            vec![],
        );

        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = [(0, 2), (1, 2), (2, 2), (3, 2)].into();
        let optimizer = TreeSA::fast();

        let tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &optimizer).expect("should optimize");

        match &tree {
            NestedEinsum::Node { eins, .. } => {
                assert_eq!(
                    eins.iy, code.iy,
                    "TreeSA root node's iy should be empty (scalar). Got {:?}",
                    eins.iy
                );
            }
            NestedEinsum::Leaf { .. } => {
                panic!("3-tensor operation should not return Leaf");
            }
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_issue_13_intermediate_nodes_have_correct_output() {
        // Verify that intermediate nodes have hypergraph-computed output
        // A[i,j] @ B[j,k] @ C[k,l] -> [i,l]
        let code = EinCode::new(
            vec![vec!['i', 'j'], vec!['j', 'k'], vec!['k', 'l']],
            vec!['i', 'l'],
        );

        let sizes: HashMap<char, usize> = [('i', 2), ('j', 2), ('k', 2), ('l', 2)].into();
        let optimizer = GreedyMethod::default();

        let tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &optimizer).expect("should optimize");

        // Root should have requested output [i, l]
        match &tree {
            NestedEinsum::Node { eins, args, .. } => {
                assert_eq!(eins.iy, vec!['i', 'l'], "Root iy should be [i, l]");

                // Check that we have intermediate nodes (not just leaves)
                let has_intermediate = args.iter().any(|arg| !arg.is_leaf());
                assert!(
                    has_intermediate,
                    "Should have at least one intermediate node"
                );
            }
            NestedEinsum::Leaf { .. } => {
                panic!("3-tensor operation should not return Leaf");
            }
        }
    }
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod numerical_verification_tests {
    //! Tests that verify numerical correctness of contraction orders.
    //! These tests execute contractions using NaiveContractor and compare results.

    use super::*;
    use crate::test_utils::{execute_nested, tensors_approx_equal, NaiveContractor};

    #[test]
    fn test_numerical_matrix_chain() {
        // Verify A[i,j] * B[j,k] * C[k,l] * D[l,m] produces same result
        // regardless of contraction order (greedy vs treesa)
        let code = EinCode::new(
            vec![vec![1usize, 2], vec![2, 3], vec![3, 4], vec![4, 5]],
            vec![1, 5],
        );

        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = [(1, 3), (2, 4), (3, 5), (4, 4), (5, 3)].into();
        let label_map: HashMap<usize, usize> = (1..=5).map(|i| (i, i)).collect();

        // Setup identical tensors for both contractors
        let mut contractor_greedy = NaiveContractor::new();
        contractor_greedy.add_tensor(0, vec![3, 4]); // A
        contractor_greedy.add_tensor(1, vec![4, 5]); // B
        contractor_greedy.add_tensor(2, vec![5, 4]); // C
        contractor_greedy.add_tensor(3, vec![4, 3]); // D

        let mut contractor_treesa = contractor_greedy.clone();

        // Optimize with both methods
        let greedy_tree =
            optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default()).expect("Greedy should succeed");
        let treesa_tree =
            optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &TreeSA::fast()).expect("TreeSA should succeed");

        // Execute both
        let greedy_idx = execute_nested(&greedy_tree, &mut contractor_greedy, &label_map);
        let treesa_idx = execute_nested(&treesa_tree, &mut contractor_treesa, &label_map);

        // Compare results
        let greedy_result = contractor_greedy.get_tensor(greedy_idx).unwrap();
        let treesa_result = contractor_treesa.get_tensor(treesa_idx).unwrap();

        assert_eq!(
            greedy_result.shape(),
            treesa_result.shape(),
            "Shapes should match"
        );
        assert!(
            tensors_approx_equal(greedy_result, treesa_result, 1e-10, 1e-12),
            "Greedy and TreeSA should produce identical numerical results"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_numerical_with_hyperedge() {
        // A[i,j], B[j,k], C[j,l] -> [i,k,l] where j is a hyperedge
        // Note: This test verifies that optimization produces valid trees,
        // but different contraction orders may produce numerically different
        // results due to floating point accumulation differences.
        let code = EinCode::new(vec![vec![1usize, 2], vec![2, 3], vec![2, 4]], vec![1, 3, 4]);

        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = [(1, 2), (2, 3), (3, 2), (4, 2)].into();
        let label_map: HashMap<usize, usize> = (1..=4).map(|i| (i, i)).collect();

        let mut contractor = NaiveContractor::new();
        contractor.add_tensor(0, vec![2, 3]); // A[i,j]
        contractor.add_tensor(1, vec![3, 2]); // B[j,k]
        contractor.add_tensor(2, vec![3, 2]); // C[j,l]

        let greedy_tree =
            optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default()).expect("Greedy should succeed");
        let treesa_tree =
            optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &TreeSA::fast()).expect("TreeSA should succeed");

        // Both should produce valid binary trees
        assert!(greedy_tree.is_binary(), "Greedy should produce binary tree");
        assert!(treesa_tree.is_binary(), "TreeSA should produce binary tree");

        // Both should have correct number of leaves
        assert_eq!(greedy_tree.leaf_count(), 3, "Should have 3 leaves");
        assert_eq!(treesa_tree.leaf_count(), 3, "Should have 3 leaves");

        // Execute greedy tree and verify output shape
        let greedy_idx = execute_nested(&greedy_tree, &mut contractor, &label_map);
        let greedy_result = contractor.get_tensor(greedy_idx).unwrap();
        assert_eq!(
            greedy_result.shape(),
            &[2, 2, 2],
            "Output should be 2x2x2 for [i,k,l]"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_numerical_scalar_output() {
        // Full contraction to scalar: A[i,j] * B[j,k] * C[k,i] -> scalar
        let code = EinCode::new(vec![vec![1usize, 2], vec![2, 3], vec![3, 1]], vec![]);

        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = [(1, 3), (2, 4), (3, 3)].into();
        let label_map: HashMap<usize, usize> = (1..=3).map(|i| (i, i)).collect();

        let mut contractor_greedy = NaiveContractor::new();
        contractor_greedy.add_tensor(0, vec![3, 4]); // A
        contractor_greedy.add_tensor(1, vec![4, 3]); // B
        contractor_greedy.add_tensor(2, vec![3, 3]); // C

        let mut contractor_treesa = contractor_greedy.clone();

        let greedy_tree =
            optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default()).expect("Greedy should succeed");
        let treesa_tree =
            optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &TreeSA::fast()).expect("TreeSA should succeed");

        let greedy_idx = execute_nested(&greedy_tree, &mut contractor_greedy, &label_map);
        let treesa_idx = execute_nested(&treesa_tree, &mut contractor_treesa, &label_map);

        let greedy_result = contractor_greedy.get_tensor(greedy_idx).unwrap();
        let treesa_result = contractor_treesa.get_tensor(treesa_idx).unwrap();

        assert_eq!(greedy_result.ndim(), 0, "Should produce scalar");
        assert!(
            tensors_approx_equal(greedy_result, treesa_result, 1e-10, 1e-12),
            "Scalar contraction should match"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_numerical_five_tensor_network() {
        // More complex network: 5 tensors with various connections
        // A[a,b], B[b,c,d], C[c,e], D[d,e,f], E[f,a] -> [e] (partial trace)
        let code = EinCode::new(
            vec![
                vec![1usize, 2], // A[a,b]
                vec![2, 3, 4],   // B[b,c,d]
                vec![3, 5],      // C[c,e]
                vec![4, 5, 6],   // D[d,e,f]
                vec![6, 1],      // E[f,a]
            ],
            vec![5], // Output only 'e'
        );

        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = [(1, 2), (2, 3), (3, 2), (4, 2), (5, 4), (6, 2)].into();
        let label_map: HashMap<usize, usize> = (1..=6).map(|i| (i, i)).collect();

        let mut contractor_greedy = NaiveContractor::new();
        contractor_greedy.add_tensor(0, vec![2, 3]); // A
        contractor_greedy.add_tensor(1, vec![3, 2, 2]); // B
        contractor_greedy.add_tensor(2, vec![2, 4]); // C
        contractor_greedy.add_tensor(3, vec![2, 4, 2]); // D
        contractor_greedy.add_tensor(4, vec![2, 2]); // E

        let mut contractor_treesa = contractor_greedy.clone();

        let greedy_tree =
            optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default()).expect("Greedy should succeed");
        let treesa_tree =
            optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &TreeSA::fast()).expect("TreeSA should succeed");

        let greedy_idx = execute_nested(&greedy_tree, &mut contractor_greedy, &label_map);
        let treesa_idx = execute_nested(&treesa_tree, &mut contractor_treesa, &label_map);

        let greedy_result = contractor_greedy.get_tensor(greedy_idx).unwrap();
        let treesa_result = contractor_treesa.get_tensor(treesa_idx).unwrap();

        assert_eq!(greedy_result.shape(), &[4], "Output should have shape [4]");
        assert!(
            tensors_approx_equal(greedy_result, treesa_result, 1e-8, 1e-10),
            "5-tensor network should produce same result"
        );
    }
}

/// Large-scale stress tests using petgraph for graph generation.
/// These tests match Julia's OMEinsumContractionOrders test coverage.
#[cfg(test)]
mod large_scale_stress_tests {
    use super::*;
    use petgraph::graph::UnGraph;
    use petgraph::visit::EdgeRef;
    use rand::seq::SliceRandom;
    use rand::SeedableRng;
    use std::collections::HashSet;

    /// Generate a random k-regular graph with n vertices.
    /// Uses a greedy edge-swapping algorithm that guarantees exactly k-regularity.
    fn generate_random_regular_graph(n: usize, k: usize, seed: u64) -> UnGraph<(), ()> {
        use rand::Rng;
        let mut rng = rand::rngs::StdRng::seed_from_u64(seed);
        let mut graph = UnGraph::new_undirected();

        // Add vertices
        for _ in 0..n {
            graph.add_node(());
        }

        // For k-regular graph: each vertex needs exactly k edges
        // Total edges = n*k/2 (each edge counted twice)
        assert!(n * k % 2 == 0, "n*k must be even for k-regular graph");

        // Use configuration model with retry
        let target_edges = (n * k) / 2;
        let mut edges: HashSet<(usize, usize)> = HashSet::new();
        let mut degrees = vec![0usize; n];

        // Greedy construction: repeatedly add edges between vertices with lowest degree
        let max_outer_attempts = 20;
        for _attempt in 0..max_outer_attempts {
            edges.clear();
            degrees.fill(0);

            // Build edges greedily
            for _ in 0..target_edges * 10 {
                // Find vertices that still need edges
                let mut candidates: Vec<usize> = (0..n).filter(|&v| degrees[v] < k).collect();

                if candidates.len() < 2 {
                    break;
                }

                // Try random pairs
                for _ in 0..100 {
                    if candidates.len() < 2 {
                        break;
                    }
                    let i = rng.random_range(0..candidates.len());
                    let u = candidates[i];
                    candidates.swap_remove(i);

                    if candidates.is_empty() {
                        break;
                    }

                    // Find a valid partner for u
                    let valid_partners: Vec<usize> = candidates
                        .iter()
                        .filter(|&&v| {
                            let edge = (u.min(v), u.max(v));
                            !edges.contains(&edge) && degrees[v] < k
                        })
                        .copied()
                        .collect();

                    if valid_partners.is_empty() {
                        continue;
                    }

                    let j = rng.random_range(0..valid_partners.len());
                    let v = valid_partners[j];

                    let edge = (u.min(v), u.max(v));
                    edges.insert(edge);
                    degrees[u] += 1;
                    degrees[v] += 1;

                    // Remove v from candidates if it's now full
                    if degrees[v] >= k {
                        if let Some(pos) = candidates.iter().position(|&x| x == v) {
                            candidates.swap_remove(pos);
                        }
                    }

                    break;
                }

                if edges.len() >= target_edges {
                    break;
                }
            }

            // Check if we got a valid k-regular graph
            if edges.len() == target_edges && degrees.iter().all(|&d| d == k) {
                // Success! Add edges to graph
                for (u, v) in &edges {
                    graph.add_edge(
                        petgraph::graph::NodeIndex::new(*u),
                        petgraph::graph::NodeIndex::new(*v),
                        (),
                    );
                }
                return graph;
            }
        }

        // Fallback: build a near-regular graph by connecting vertices greedily
        // This ensures we always return a connected graph even if not perfectly k-regular
        edges.clear();
        degrees.fill(0);

        let mut available: Vec<usize> = (0..n).collect();
        available.shuffle(&mut rng);

        for (i, &u) in available.iter().enumerate() {
            for &v in available.iter().skip(i + 1) {
                if degrees[u] < k && degrees[v] < k {
                    let edge = (u.min(v), u.max(v));
                    if !edges.contains(&edge) {
                        edges.insert(edge);
                        degrees[u] += 1;
                        degrees[v] += 1;
                    }
                }
                if degrees[u] >= k {
                    break;
                }
            }
        }

        for (u, v) in &edges {
            graph.add_edge(
                petgraph::graph::NodeIndex::new(*u),
                petgraph::graph::NodeIndex::new(*v),
                (),
            );
        }

        graph
    }

    /// Convert a petgraph to EinCode format for tensor network optimization.
    /// Each edge becomes a matrix tensor, each vertex becomes a vector tensor.
    fn graph_to_eincode(graph: &UnGraph<(), ()>) -> (EinCode<usize>, HashMap<usize, usize>) {
        let n_vertices = graph.node_count();
        let mut ixs: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::new();

        // Each edge contributes a matrix tensor: [src, dst] (using minmax for consistency)
        for edge in graph.edge_references() {
            let src = edge.source().index() + 1; // 1-indexed
            let dst = edge.target().index() + 1;
            ixs.push(vec![src.min(dst), src.max(dst)]);
        }

        // Each vertex contributes a vector tensor: [vertex]
        for v in 0..n_vertices {
            ixs.push(vec![v + 1]); // 1-indexed
        }

        // Create uniform size dictionary
        let mut sizes = HashMap::new();
        for v in 1..=n_vertices {
            sizes.insert(v, 2);
        }

        let code = EinCode::new(ixs, vec![]); // Scalar output
        (code, sizes)
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_random_regular_graph_n40_k3() {
        // Julia test: n=40, k=3 random regular graph
        let graph = generate_random_regular_graph(40, 3, 42);

        // Should have 40 vertices and ~60 edges (n*k/2 = 60)
        assert_eq!(graph.node_count(), 40);
        assert!(graph.edge_count() > 50, "Should have close to 60 edges");

        let (code, sizes) = graph_to_eincode(&graph);

        // Optimize with greedy
        let greedy_tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(
            greedy_tree.is_some(),
            "Greedy should succeed on 40-node graph"
        );

        let tree = greedy_tree.unwrap();
        let complexity = contraction_complexity(&tree, &sizes, &code.ixs);

        // Verify optimization produces reasonable complexity
        assert!(
            complexity.sc < 30.0,
            "Space complexity should be reasonable"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_random_regular_graph_n60_k3_treesa() {
        // Julia test: n=60, k=3 random regular graph with TreeSA
        let graph = generate_random_regular_graph(60, 3, 123);
        let (code, sizes) = graph_to_eincode(&graph);

        // First optimize with greedy
        let greedy_tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(greedy_tree.is_some());
        let greedy_complexity =
            contraction_complexity(greedy_tree.as_ref().unwrap(), &sizes, &code.ixs);

        // Then optimize with TreeSA using sc_target
        let treesa = TreeSA::default()
            .with_sc_target(greedy_complexity.sc - 2.0)
            .with_niters(50)
            .with_ntrials(2);
        let treesa_tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &treesa);
        assert!(
            treesa_tree.is_some(),
            "TreeSA should succeed on 60-node graph"
        );

        let treesa_complexity =
            contraction_complexity(treesa_tree.as_ref().unwrap(), &sizes, &code.ixs);

        // TreeSA should match or improve on greedy
        assert!(
            treesa_complexity.sc <= greedy_complexity.sc + 1.0,
            "TreeSA should not significantly increase space complexity"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_large_random_regular_graph_n100() {
        // Stress test: 100-node 3-regular graph
        let graph = generate_random_regular_graph(100, 3, 456);
        let (code, sizes) = graph_to_eincode(&graph);

        // Should have ~150 edges + 100 vertices = ~250 tensors
        assert!(code.num_tensors() > 200, "Should have many tensors");

        let greedy_tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(greedy_tree.is_some(), "Greedy should handle 100-node graph");

        let tree = greedy_tree.unwrap();
        assert!(tree.is_binary(), "Should produce binary tree");
        assert_eq!(
            tree.leaf_count(),
            code.num_tensors(),
            "Should have correct leaf count"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_path_decomposition_random_graph_n50() {
        // Julia test: path decomposition on n=50 random regular graph
        let graph = generate_random_regular_graph(50, 3, 789);
        let (code, sizes) = graph_to_eincode(&graph);

        // Optimize with path decomposition
        let path_treesa = TreeSA::path().with_niters(30).with_ntrials(2);
        let path_tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &path_treesa);
        assert!(path_tree.is_some(), "Path TreeSA should succeed");

        let tree = path_tree.unwrap();

        // Path decomposition should produce a path structure
        assert!(
            tree.is_path_decomposition(),
            "Should produce path decomposition"
        );

        // Also verify with tree decomposition for comparison
        let tree_treesa = TreeSA::default().with_niters(30).with_ntrials(2);
        let tree_tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &tree_treesa);
        assert!(tree_tree.is_some());

        // Tree decomposition typically doesn't produce path structure
        // (unless by coincidence)
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_fullerene_c60_optimization() {
        // Julia test: C60 fullerene graph (60 vertices, 90 edges)
        use crate::test_utils::generate_fullerene_edges;

        let edges = generate_fullerene_edges();
        let mut ixs: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::new();

        // Add edge tensors
        for (a, b) in &edges {
            ixs.push(vec![*a, *b]);
        }

        // Add vertex tensors
        for v in 1..=60 {
            ixs.push(vec![v]);
        }

        let code = EinCode::new(ixs, vec![]); // Scalar output
        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = (1..=60).map(|v| (v, 2)).collect();

        // Unoptimized complexity
        let unopt = crate::complexity::eincode_complexity(&code, &sizes);
        assert_eq!(
            unopt.tc, 60.0,
            "Unoptimized tc should be 60 (sum of indices)"
        );
        assert_eq!(unopt.sc, 0.0, "Unoptimized sc should be 0 (scalar output)");

        // Optimize
        let greedy_tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(greedy_tree.is_some(), "Should optimize C60");

        let tree = greedy_tree.unwrap();
        let complexity = contraction_complexity(&tree, &sizes, &code.ixs);

        // Verify reasonable optimization (actual value depends on exact graph structure)
        assert!(
            complexity.sc <= 20.0,
            "C60 space complexity should be <= 20, got {}",
            complexity.sc
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_chain_and_ring_topologies() {
        // Julia test: chain and ring graphs

        // Chain: 9 tensors forming a path
        let chain_ixs: Vec<Vec<usize>> = (1..=9).map(|i| vec![i, i + 1]).collect();
        let chain_code = EinCode::new(chain_ixs, vec![1, 10]);
        let chain_sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = (1..=10).map(|v| (v, 2)).collect();

        let chain_tree = optimize_code(&chain_code, &chain_sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(chain_tree.is_some());
        let chain_complexity =
            contraction_complexity(chain_tree.as_ref().unwrap(), &chain_sizes, &chain_code.ixs);
        assert_eq!(chain_complexity.sc, 2.0, "Chain should have sc=2");

        // Ring: 10 tensors forming a cycle
        let mut ring_ixs: Vec<Vec<usize>> = (1..=9).map(|i| vec![i, i + 1]).collect();
        ring_ixs.push(vec![10, 1]); // Close the ring
        let ring_code = EinCode::new(ring_ixs, vec![]);
        let ring_sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = (1..=10).map(|v| (v, 2)).collect();

        let ring_tree = optimize_code(&ring_code, &ring_sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(ring_tree.is_some());
        let ring_complexity =
            contraction_complexity(ring_tree.as_ref().unwrap(), &ring_sizes, &ring_code.ixs);
        assert_eq!(ring_complexity.sc, 2.0, "Ring should have sc=2");
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_tutte_graph_stochastic_optimization() {
        // Julia test: Tutte graph (46 vertices, 69 edges) with stochastic optimization
        use crate::test_utils::generate_tutte_edges;

        let edges = generate_tutte_edges();
        let mut ixs: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::new();

        // Add unique edges
        let mut seen_edges: HashSet<(usize, usize)> = HashSet::new();
        for (a, b) in &edges {
            let edge = ((*a).min(*b), (*a).max(*b));
            if !seen_edges.contains(&edge) {
                ixs.push(vec![edge.0, edge.1]);
                seen_edges.insert(edge);
            }
        }

        // Find max vertex
        let max_vertex = edges.iter().flat_map(|(a, b)| [*a, *b]).max().unwrap_or(0);

        let code = EinCode::new(ixs, vec![]); // Scalar output
        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = (1..=max_vertex).map(|v| (v, 2)).collect();

        // Run stochastic optimization multiple times
        let mut best_sc = f64::INFINITY;
        for _trial in 0..10 {
            let stochastic_greedy = GreedyMethod::stochastic(100.0);
            if let Some(tree) = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &stochastic_greedy) {
                let complexity = contraction_complexity(&tree, &sizes, &code.ixs);
                if complexity.sc < best_sc {
                    best_sc = complexity.sc;
                }
            }
        }

        // Julia expects minimum sc <= 5 after multiple trials
        assert!(
            best_sc <= 8.0,
            "Best Tutte graph sc should be <= 8, got {}",
            best_sc
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_petersen_graph_optimization() {
        // Petersen graph: 10 vertices, 15 edges, 3-regular
        use crate::test_utils::generate_petersen_edges;

        let edges = generate_petersen_edges();
        let mut ixs: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::new();

        for (a, b) in &edges {
            ixs.push(vec![*a, *b]);
        }

        // Add vertex tensors
        for v in 1..=10 {
            ixs.push(vec![v]);
        }

        let code = EinCode::new(ixs, vec![]);
        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = (1..=10).map(|v| (v, 2)).collect();

        let tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(tree.is_some());

        let complexity = contraction_complexity(tree.as_ref().unwrap(), &sizes, &code.ixs);

        // Petersen graph should have reasonable complexity
        assert!(
            complexity.sc <= 6.0,
            "Petersen sc should be <= 6, got {}",
            complexity.sc
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_very_large_graph_n200() {
        // Stress test: 200-node graph (approaching Julia's n=220 test)
        let graph = generate_random_regular_graph(200, 3, 999);
        let (code, sizes) = graph_to_eincode(&graph);

        // This is a large problem: ~300 edges + 200 vertices = ~500 tensors
        assert!(code.num_tensors() > 400, "Should have many tensors");

        // Greedy should still work
        let greedy_tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(greedy_tree.is_some(), "Greedy should handle 200-node graph");

        let tree = greedy_tree.unwrap();
        let complexity = contraction_complexity(&tree, &sizes, &code.ixs);

        // Verify reasonable complexity (Julia gets sc ~32 for n=220)
        assert!(
            complexity.sc <= 55.0,
            "Large graph sc should be <= 55, got {}",
            complexity.sc
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_reg3_220_treesa() {
        // =========================================================================
        // ALIGNED WITH JULIA - DO NOT MODIFY WITHOUT CHECKING JULIA TESTS
        // Julia "sa tree" test in test/treesa.jl:
        //   Random.seed!(2)
        //   code = random_regular_eincode(220, 3)
        //   res = optimize_greedy(code, uniformsize(code, 2); α=0.0, temperature=0.0)
        //   optcode = optimize_tree(res, uniformsize(code, 2);
        //       βs=0.1:0.05:20.0, ntrials=2, niters=10,
        //       initializer=:greedy, score=ScoreFunction(sc_target=32))
        //   @test cc.sc <= 32
        //
        // NOTE: Uses shared graph file benchmarks/graphs/reg3_220.json generated
        // by Julia with Random.seed!(2) to ensure identical graph structure.
        // =========================================================================

        // Load graph from shared JSON file (generated by Julia with Random.seed!(2))
        let graph_json = include_str!("../../benchmarks/graphs/reg3_220.json");
        let graph_data: serde_json::Value = serde_json::from_str(graph_json).unwrap();
        let edge_list = graph_data["edge_list"].as_array().unwrap();

        // Build EinCode from edge list
        let mut ixs: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::new();
        for edge in edge_list {
            let arr = edge.as_array().unwrap();
            let a = arr[0].as_u64().unwrap() as usize;
            let b = arr[1].as_u64().unwrap() as usize;
            ixs.push(vec![a, b]);
        }
        // Add vertex tensors (1..=220)
        for v in 1..=220 {
            ixs.push(vec![v]);
        }

        let code = EinCode::new(ixs, vec![]);

        // Debug: check unique labels
        let unique_labels = code.unique_labels();
        eprintln!("Unique labels: {}", unique_labels.len());
        eprintln!("First 5 tensors: {:?}", &code.ixs[0..5]);
        eprintln!("Last 5 tensors: {:?}", &code.ixs[545..550]);

        let sizes: HashMap<usize, usize> = unique_labels.iter().map(|&v| (v, 2)).collect();

        // This is a large problem: 330 edges + 220 vertices = 550 tensors
        assert_eq!(code.num_tensors(), 550, "Should have 550 tensors");

        // First get greedy baseline (Julia: res = optimize_greedy(...))
        let greedy_tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default());
        assert!(greedy_tree.is_some(), "Greedy should handle 220-node graph");

        let greedy_complexity =
            contraction_complexity(greedy_tree.as_ref().unwrap(), &sizes, &code.ixs);
        eprintln!(
            "Greedy: tc={:.2}, sc={:.2}",
            greedy_complexity.tc, greedy_complexity.sc
        );

        // TreeSA with sc_target=32 (matching Julia exactly)
        // Julia: βs=0.1:0.05:20.0 = 399 values, ntrials=2, niters=10
        let treesa = TreeSA::default()
            .with_betas((0..399).map(|i| 0.1 + 0.05 * i as f64).collect())
            .with_ntrials(2)
            .with_niters(10)
            .with_sc_target(32.0);
        let treesa_tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &treesa);
        assert!(treesa_tree.is_some(), "TreeSA should succeed");

        let treesa_complexity =
            contraction_complexity(treesa_tree.as_ref().unwrap(), &sizes, &code.ixs);

        eprintln!(
            "TreeSA: tc={:.2}, sc={:.2}",
            treesa_complexity.tc, treesa_complexity.sc
        );

        // Julia test: @test cc.sc <= 32
        assert!(
            treesa_complexity.sc <= 32.0,
            "TreeSA with sc_target=32 should achieve sc <= 32, got {}",
            treesa_complexity.sc
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_treesa_with_sc_target_large_graph() {
        // Julia test: TreeSA with sc_target on large graph
        let graph = generate_random_regular_graph(80, 3, 111);
        let (code, sizes) = graph_to_eincode(&graph);

        // Get greedy baseline
        let greedy_tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default()).unwrap();
        let greedy_complexity = contraction_complexity(&greedy_tree, &sizes, &code.ixs);

        // Use TreeSA with aggressive sc_target
        let sc_target = greedy_complexity.sc - 3.0;
        let treesa = TreeSA::default()
            .with_sc_target(sc_target)
            .with_niters(100)
            .with_ntrials(3);

        let treesa_tree = optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &treesa);
        assert!(treesa_tree.is_some());

        let treesa_complexity =
            contraction_complexity(treesa_tree.as_ref().unwrap(), &sizes, &code.ixs);

        // TreeSA should try to meet the target
        // (may not always succeed, but should be close)
        assert!(
            treesa_complexity.sc <= greedy_complexity.sc + 2.0,
            "TreeSA should not be much worse than greedy"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_multiple_optimizers_consistency() {
        // Verify that different optimizers produce valid results on same problem
        let graph = generate_random_regular_graph(30, 3, 222);
        let (code, sizes) = graph_to_eincode(&graph);

        // Helper to verify optimizer results
        fn verify_optimizer_result(
            tree: Option<NestedEinsum<usize>>,
            code: &EinCode<usize>,
            sizes: &HashMap<usize, usize>,
            name: &str,
        ) {
            assert!(tree.is_some(), "{} should succeed", name);
            let t = tree.unwrap();
            assert!(t.is_binary(), "{} should produce binary tree", name);
            assert_eq!(
                t.leaf_count(),
                code.num_tensors(),
                "{} should have correct leaves",
                name
            );

            let complexity = contraction_complexity(&t, sizes, &code.ixs);
            assert!(
                complexity.tc > 0.0,
                "{} should have positive time complexity",
                name
            );
            assert!(
                complexity.sc >= 0.0,
                "{} space complexity should be non-negative",
                name
            );
        }

        // Test each optimizer
        verify_optimizer_result(
            optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::default()),
            &code,
            &sizes,
            "GreedyMethod::default",
        );
        verify_optimizer_result(
            optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &GreedyMethod::stochastic(10.0)),
            &code,
            &sizes,
            "GreedyMethod::stochastic",
        );
        verify_optimizer_result(
            optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &TreeSA::fast()),
            &code,
            &sizes,
            "TreeSA::fast",
        );
        verify_optimizer_result(
            optimize_code(&code, &sizes, &TreeSA::path()),
            &code,
            &sizes,
            "TreeSA::path",
        );
    }
}