1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
//! 有关「推理上下文」中「导出结论」的功能
//! * 🎯分离并锁定「导出结论」的方法
use super::{ReasonContext, ReasonContextWithLinks};
use crate::{
entity::{
BudgetValue, Judgement, JudgementV1, Punctuation, Sentence, SentenceV1, Stamp, Task,
TruthValue,
},
inference::Budget,
language::Term,
util::ToDisplayAndBrief,
};
use nar_dev_utils::RefCount;
/// 自动实现 for 「推理上下文」
pub trait ContextDerivation: ReasonContext {
/// 共用终端逻辑:「激活任务」
/// # 📄OpenNARS
///
/// Activated task called in MatchingRules.trySolution and
/// Concept.processGoal
/// * 📝仅被「答问」调用
fn activated_task(
&mut self,
new_budget: impl Into<BudgetValue>,
solution: &JudgementV1,
candidate_belief: &JudgementV1,
) {
let parent_task = self.current_task().clone();
let task = Task::new(
self.reasoner_mut().updated_task_current_serial(),
solution.clone().into(),
new_budget.into(),
Some(parent_task),
Some(solution.clone()),
Some(candidate_belief.clone()),
);
// * 🚩现在重新改为`COMMENT`,但更详细地展示「任务」本身
self.report_comment(format!("!!! Activated: {}", task.to_display_long()));
// // * 🚩若为「问题」⇒输出显著的「导出结论」
self.add_new_task(task);
}
/// 共用终端逻辑:「导出任务」
///
/// # 📄OpenNARS
///
/// Derived task comes from the inference rules.
fn derived_task(&mut self, new_task: Task) {
// * 🚩判断「导出的新任务」是否有价值
if !new_task.budget_above_threshold(self.parameters().budget_threshold) {
self.report_comment(format!("!!! Ignored: {}", new_task.to_display_long()));
return;
}
// * 🚩报告
self.report_comment(format!("!!! Derived: {}", new_task.to_display_long()));
let budget_summary = new_task.budget_summary().to_float();
if budget_summary > self.silence_percent() {
// only report significant derived Tasks
self.report_out(&new_task);
}
// * 🚩将「导出的新任务」添加到「新任务表」中
self.add_new_task(new_task);
}
/// 🆕仅源自「修正规则」调用,没有「父信念」
fn double_premise_task_revision(
&mut self,
new_content: Term,
new_truth: impl Into<TruthValue>,
new_budget: impl Into<BudgetValue>,
new_stamp: Stamp,
) {
// * 🚩仅在「任务内容」可用时构造
let current_task = self.current_task(); // 不能当场变为引用:后续可能要再借用自身
let new_punctuation = current_task.get_().punctuation();
let new_sentence = SentenceV1::with_punctuation(
new_content,
new_punctuation,
new_stamp,
Some((new_truth.into(), true)),
);
drop(current_task); // ! 先抛掉引用代理
match new_sentence {
Ok(new_sentence) => {
let new_task = Task::from_derived(
self.reasoner_mut().updated_task_current_serial(),
new_sentence,
new_budget.into(),
Some(self.current_task().clone()),
None,
);
self.derived_task(new_task);
}
Err(error) => self.report_error(error.to_string()),
}
}
}
/// 对「所有实现了『推理上下文』的结构」实现该特征
/// * 📝需要采用`?Sized`以包括【运行时尺寸未定】的对象
/// * ⚠️不然默认仅对[`Sized`]实现
impl<T: ?Sized + ReasonContext> ContextDerivation for T {}
pub trait ContextDerivationConcept: ReasonContextWithLinks {
/// 🆕产生新时间戳 from 单前提
fn generate_new_stamp_single(&self) -> Stamp {
let current_task_ref = self.current_task();
let current_task = current_task_ref.get_();
match (current_task.is_judgement(), self.current_belief()) {
// * 🚩「当前任务」是判断句 | 没有「当前信念」
(true, _) | (_, None) => Stamp::with_old(&*current_task, self.time()),
// * 🚩其它 ⇒ 时间戳来自信念
// to answer a question with negation in NAL-5 --- move to activated task?
(false, Some(belief)) => Stamp::with_old(belief, self.time()),
}
}
/// 🆕产生新时间戳 from 双前提
///
/// ? 是否需要通过「假定有『当前信念』」实现「直接返回[`Stamp`]而非[`Option<Stamp>`](Option)」?
fn generate_new_stamp_double(&self) -> Option<Stamp> {
let current_task_ref = self.current_task();
let current_task = current_task_ref.get_();
// * 🚩在具有「当前信念」时返回「与『当前任务』合并的时间戳」
self.current_belief().map(|belief|
// * 📌此处的「时间戳」一定是「当前信念」的时间戳
// * 📄理由:最后返回的信念与「成功时比对的信念」一致(只隔着`clone`)
Stamp::from_merge_unchecked(&*current_task, belief, self.time(), self.max_evidence_base_length()))
}
/* --------------- new task building --------------- */
/// Shared final operations by all double-premise rules, called from the
/// rules except StructuralRules
/// * 🚩【2024-05-19 12:44:55】构造函数简化:导出的结论【始终可修正】
fn double_premise_task(
&mut self,
new_content: Term,
new_truth: Option<TruthValue>,
new_budget: impl Into<BudgetValue>,
) {
// * 🚩尝试创建「新时间戳」然后使用之
if let Some(new_stamp) = self.generate_new_stamp_double() {
let new_truth_revisable = new_truth.map(|truth| (truth, true));
self.double_premise_task_full(
None, // * 🚩默认「当前任务」
new_content,
new_truth_revisable,
new_budget,
new_stamp,
)
}
}
/// 🆕其直接调用来自组合规则、匹配规则(修正)
/// * 🎯避免对`currentTask`的赋值,解耦调用(并让`currentTask`不可变)
/// * 🎯避免对`newStamp`的复制,解耦调用(让「新时间戳」的赋值止步在「推理开始」之前)
fn double_premise_task_compositional(
&mut self,
current_task: &Task,
new_content: Term,
new_truth: Option<TruthValue>,
new_budget: impl Into<BudgetValue>,
new_stamp: Stamp,
) {
self.double_premise_task_full(
Some(current_task),
new_content,
// * 🚩默认「可修正」
new_truth.map(|truth| (truth, true)),
new_budget,
new_stamp,
)
}
/// 🆕重定向
fn double_premise_task_not_revisable(
&mut self,
new_content: Term,
new_truth: Option<impl Into<TruthValue>>,
new_budget: impl Into<BudgetValue>,
) {
if let Some(new_stamp) = self.generate_new_stamp_double() {
self.double_premise_task_full(
None, // * 🚩默认「当前任务」
new_content,
// * 🚩默认「不可修正」,其它相同
new_truth.map(|truth| (truth, false)),
new_budget,
new_stamp,
)
}
}
/// 「双前提导出结论」的完整方法实现
/// * 🚩【2024-06-27 00:52:39】为避免借用冲突,此处使用[`Option`]区分「传入其它地方引用/使用自身引用」
/// * 有值 ⇒ 使用内部的值
/// * 空值 ⇒ 从`self`中拿取
///
/// # 📄OpenNARS
///
/// Shared final operations by all double-premise rules,
/// called from the rules except StructuralRules
fn double_premise_task_full(
&mut self,
current_task: Option<&Task>,
new_content: Term,
new_truth_revisable: Option<(impl Into<TruthValue>, bool)>,
new_budget: impl Into<BudgetValue>,
new_stamp: Stamp,
) {
// * 🚩参考「传入任务/自身默认任务」构造标点
let new_punctuation = current_task
.unwrap_or(&*self.current_task().get_()) // 立即使用的不可变引用
.punctuation();
let new_sentence = SentenceV1::with_punctuation(
new_content,
new_punctuation,
new_stamp,
new_truth_revisable.map(|(truth, revisable)| (truth.into(), revisable)),
);
if let Ok(sentence) = new_sentence {
let new_task = Task::from_derived(
self.reasoner_mut().updated_task_current_serial(),
sentence,
new_budget,
Some(self.current_task().clone()),
self.current_belief().cloned(),
);
// * 🚩正式导出结论(在这之前注销代理)
self.derived_task(new_task);
}
}
/// Shared final operations by all single-premise rules,
/// called in StructuralRules
fn single_premise_task_full(
&mut self,
new_content: Term,
punctuation: Punctuation,
new_truth: Option<impl Into<TruthValue>>,
new_budget: impl Into<BudgetValue>,
) {
// * 🚩兼容各类「真值」「预算值」的引用(自动转换成真值)
let new_truth = new_truth.map(Into::into);
let new_budget = new_budget.into();
let current_task_ref = self.current_task();
let current_task = current_task_ref.get_();
let parent_task = current_task.parent_task();
// * 🚩对于「结构转换」的单前提推理,若已有父任务且该任务与父任务相同⇒中止,避免重复推理
if let Some(parent_task) = parent_task {
if new_content == *parent_task.get_().content() {
return; // to avoid circular structural inference
}
}
let task_sentence = &*current_task;
// * 🚩构造新时间戳
let new_stamp = self.generate_new_stamp_single();
// * 🚩使用新内容构造新语句
let revisable = task_sentence
.as_judgement()
// * 🚩判断句⇒返回实际的「可修订」
// * 🚩疑问句⇒返回一个用不到的空值
.map_or(false, Judgement::revisable);
drop(current_task); // ! 先释放「借用代理」
drop(current_task_ref);
// * 🚩判断句⇒返回实际的「可修订」
// * 🚩疑问句⇒返回一个用不到的空值
let new_sentence = SentenceV1::with_punctuation(
new_content,
punctuation,
new_stamp,
new_truth.map(|truth| (truth, revisable)),
);
let new_sentence = match new_sentence {
// * 🚩伪·问号解包
Ok(sentence) => sentence,
Err(..) => return,
};
// * 🚩构造新任务
let new_task = Task::from_derived(
self.reasoner_mut().updated_task_current_serial(),
new_sentence,
new_budget,
// * 🚩拷贝共享引用
Some(self.current_task().clone()),
None,
);
// * 🚩导出
self.derived_task(new_task);
}
/// 来自「结构规则」与「转换规则」的单前提导出
/// * 🚩除了「标点」固定指向「当前任务」外,其它与[完整方法](ContextDerivationConcept::single_premise_task_full)一致
fn single_premise_task_structural(
&mut self,
new_content: Term,
new_truth: Option<impl Into<TruthValue>>,
new_budget: impl Into<BudgetValue>,
) {
// * 🚩新任务标点取自「当前任务」
let punctuation = self.current_task().get_().punctuation();
self.single_premise_task_full(new_content, punctuation, new_truth, new_budget)
}
}
/// * 📝需要采用`?Sized`以包括【运行时尺寸未定】的对象
/// * ⚠️不然默认仅对[`Sized`]实现
impl<T: ?Sized + ReasonContextWithLinks> ContextDerivationConcept for T {}