meterstore 0.5.0

Hot/cold tiered store for metering time series β€” PostgreSQL for the recent window, Apache Iceberg for history.
Documentation
# MeterStore

**Hot/cold tiered storage for metering time series.** PostgreSQL holds the recent
interval window at low latency; Apache Iceberg holds the history at analytical
scale. A single explicit timestamp separates them, and one SQL statement spans
both.

[![CI](https://github.com/hupe1980/meterstore/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/hupe1980/meterstore/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
[![License](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT%2FApache--2.0-blue.svg)](#license)

πŸ“– **[Documentation](https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore)** Β· [API reference](https://docs.rs/meterstore) Β· [Changelog](CHANGELOG.md)

> **Pre-alpha, and unpublished on purpose.** Storage, tiering, archival,
> querying, reproducible reads and completeness work end to end against real
> PostgreSQL 16 and a real Iceberg warehouse. The API is still settling;
> integrating against a real workload is what settles it.

---

## The problem

An intelligent measuring system produces one value per measuring point, per OBIS
code, per interval. Fifteen minutes is the German settlement grain:

| Scale | Rows/day | Rows/year |
|-------|----------|-----------|
| 10 k measuring points | ~1 M | ~350 M |
| 100 k (mid-size utility) | ~9.6 M | ~3.5 B |
| 1 M (metering operator) | ~96 M | ~35 B |

Retention is regulatory β€” years to decades for the settlement record. PostgreSQL
handles the first row comfortably, the second with care, and the third not at all
without becoming a full-time job.

But the operational workload genuinely needs Postgres: recent data is written
continuously, corrected, and read transactionally by billing and market
communication. Meanwhile settlement, forecasting and grid analysis scan years
across hundreds of thousands of meters β€” an object-storage-and-columnar-format
problem.

**The data has a natural split most systems refuse to exploit:** recent intervals
are hot and still being corrected; historical intervals are cold and settled. The
boundary between them is a timestamp.

## How it works

```
  MeterInterval.from ─────────────────────────────────────▢

  │◀──── Iceberg (cold, settled) ────▢│
                                      │◀── Postgres (hot) ──▢│
  epoch                       tiering_watermark            now
```

A row's interval start alone decides its tier, so the tiers are disjoint by
construction β€” no deduplication, no merge, no double-counting. Four decisions
carry most of the weight:

- **The watermark lives inside the Iceberg snapshot.** Archival writes the tier
  boundary into the snapshot summary in the same commit as the data. Iceberg
  commits are a compare-and-swap, so rows and boundary become durable together or
  not at all.
- **Purge is `DROP TABLE`, never `DELETE`.** The hot table is time-partitioned, so
  archiving a window drops exactly one partition. Deleting a day of readings for
  100 k meters row by row would leave ~9.6 M dead tuples for autovacuum.
- **Corrections are versions, not overwrites.** MSCONS corrects a value by
  *versioning* it, so the store needs only Iceberg's `append` β€” and a past
  settlement stays reproducible.
- **Nothing on the archival path holds a window.** Peak memory is the chunk size,
  not the ~9.6 M-row window.

[How tiering works β†’]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/architecture/

## Quick start

```bash
cargo add meterstore
```

```rust
use meterstore::prelude::*;
use meterstore::hot::PostgresHot;
use std::sync::Arc;
use time::Duration;

let hot = Arc::new(PostgresHot::new(pool));   // a pool you already own

let cold = IcebergSqlCatalog {
    database_url: &db_url,
    warehouse_uri: "s3://bucket/warehouse",   // or file:// memory:// gs:// abfss://
    catalog_name: "meterstore",
    namespace: "metering",
    file_target_bytes: 512 * 1024 * 1024,
    metadata_pool_max_connections: 4,
    auth: &WarehouseAuth { region: Some("eu-central-1".into()), ..Default::default() },
}.build().await?.cold();

let store = MeterStore::builder()
    .hot(hot)
    .cold(cold.clone(), cold.table_provider("readings_versions").await?)
    .table(
        TableConfig::new("readings_versions")
            .settlement_lag(Duration::days(7))
            .archival_step(Duration::DAY)
            .build()?,
    )
    .build()
    .await?;

store.create_tables().await?;
```

Then write and read:

```rust
// Routes each interval to the tier that owns it.
store.append(&[stored_series]).await?;

// One statement, both tiers β€” with the boundary it was computed against.
let result = store.query(r#"
    SELECT meter_local_day("from") AS day, SUM(value) AS kwh
    FROM readings
    WHERE malo_id = '41373559241'
      AND "from" >= '2025-01-01' AND "from" < '2026-01-01'
    GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY 1
"#).await?;

result.watermark();        // where cold ended and hot began
result.touched_hot_tier(); // whether the answer is only valid for now
```

A table declares whether it holds **spans or instants**. A *Lastgang* is energy
over `[from, to)`; a *ZΓ€hlerstandsgang* is a cumulative register value at an
instant, which BK6-24-174 (in force 06.06.2025) has made a primary record exactly
as voluminous as the Lastgang differenced out of it β€” and Β§ 146 Abs. 4 AO means
it cannot be discarded afterwards. Both tier the same way, because everything
that does the tiering reads the start timestamp:

```rust
TableConfig::new("meter_reads_versions").time_model(TimeModel::Point)
store.append_readings(&[zaehlerstandsgang]).await?;   // metering::MeterReading
store.readings(malo)?.melo(melo)?.latest().await?;   // what the meter reads now
```

They are never the same table: `value` is interval energy on one and a register
reading on the other, and summing the two together gives a number with no meaning
that looks exactly like a consumption total.

The shape also decides what **names** a reading. A Marktlokation may be measured
by several Messlokationen, and both meters carry `1-0:1.8.0` at the same instants.
A load profile belongs to the market location, so `melo_id` labels it; a register
belongs to the *meter*, so it joins the merge key β€” by default on a point table,
`identify_by_melo` either way. Keyed wrongly, two meters that agree on a number
store as one reading.

`readings` is version-resolved; `readings_versions` is the raw audit trail. The
naming is load-bearing β€” see
[the version-resolution trap](https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/interop/#the-version-resolution-trap)
before pointing an external engine at the warehouse.

`meter_local_day` is not a convenience, and for **gas it is the wrong function**.
`Europe/Berlin` observes daylight saving, so the UTC day boundary sits at 01:00
or 02:00 local and grouping on UTC days is wrong every day of the year β€” but the
German gas market does not balance on the calendar day either. A *Gastag* runs
06:00 to 06:00 local, so a gas Lastgang grouped by the calendar day books six
hours a day into the neighbouring Bilanzierungstag, with totals that still look
plausible. `meter_balancing_day("from", sparte)` reads the commodity per row and
picks the right one:

```sql
SELECT sparte, meter_balancing_day("from", sparte) AS day, SUM(value)
FROM readings GROUP BY 1, 2;
```

The DST anomaly moves with the boundary: the clocks change *before* 06:00, so the
25-hour gas day is the one named after the **Saturday** while the 25-hour
calendar day is the Sunday.

And the boundary carries up to the **month**. The gas Bilanzierungsmonat runs
01.06 06:00 to 01.07 06:00 (EDI@Energy *Allgemeine Festlegungen* v6.1c, Kap. 3.1),
so an MSCONS version scope for a gas row is cut at 06:00 as well β€” which is why
every `VersionScope` constructor takes a `Sparte`.

**An external engine does not get that function β€” so it gets the answer instead.**
SQL dialects differ on timestamp arithmetic, so no single published expression is
right everywhere. The encoder applies the calendar once, at write time, and stores
the answer:

```sql
-- Every engine. No zone conversion, no DST reasoning, no dialect.
SELECT balancing_day, SUM(value) FROM readings GROUP BY 1;
```

[Getting started β†’](https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/getting-started/)

## Requirements

| | Version | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Rust | 1.94 | Set by the dependency floor (`metering`, `iceberg`) |
| PostgreSQL | **14 or later** | Declarative range partitioning, so a purge is `DETACH` + `DROP TABLE` |
| `metering` | 0.19 or later | The domain layer β€” MeterStore stores its types, it does not redefine them |
| Apache Iceberg | format v2 | [Deliberately not v3]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/architecture/#format-version |

The cold tier takes **any** `Arc<dyn Catalog>` β€” SQL, REST, Polaris, Lakekeeper,
Glue β€” and that seam is driven end to end by the test suite rather than asserted.
Three are built for you: a PostgreSQL-backed SQL catalogue on the same database as
the hot tier, a REST catalogue (`rest-catalog`, on by default), and AWS S3 Tables
behind the `s3tables` feature. A configuration file builds whichever it names β€”
`Settings::connect()` returns the pool, both tiers and every validated table.
[Details](https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/getting-started/).

MeterStore needs only `SELECT` plus ownership of its own tables: no server
configuration, no restart, no extension. That is what makes it deployable on RDS,
Cloud SQL and Azure Postgres, where an extension-based approach is not.

## Relationship to `metering`

```
metering    β†’ what a measurement is, and how to compute with it   (zero I/O, no async)
meterstore  β†’ where it lives, how it is tiered, how it is queried  (all I/O)
```

[`metering`](https://crates.io/crates/metering) owns intervals, units, quality
flags, DST-correct calendars, validation, Ersatzwertbildung, gas conversion and
aggregation. MeterStore adds exactly three things: **correction versioning**, the
**transaction-time axis**, and the **tiering boundary**.

That boundary is deliberate. Duplicating a domain rule here β€” a unit conversion, a
DST calendar β€” would create a second implementation to keep correct, and it would
drift.

## Documentation

| | |
|---|---|
| [Getting started]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/getting-started/ | Requirements, install, a store over both tiers |
| [Architecture]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/architecture/ | The watermark, the invariant, crash-safe archival |
| [Storage model]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/storage-model/ | Columns, the merge key, identity vs attribute, constraints |
| [Writing readings]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/writing/ | Routed writes, bulk ingest, idempotent redelivery |
| [Querying]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/querying/ | SQL across tiers, provenance, the typed series API |
| [Reproducibility]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/reproducibility/ | Settlement reruns on two independent time axes |
| [Completeness]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/completeness/ | DST-aware gap detection as a first-class query |
| [Operations]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/operations/ | Scheduling, system tables, metrics, failure matrix |
| [External engines]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/interop/ | Spark, Trino, DuckDB β€” and the trap to avoid |
| [Privacy and retention]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/privacy/ | Pseudonymisation and the three-year duty |
| [Configuration]https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/configuration/ | TOML over the same validated types |

## Status

Everything the documentation describes works end to end against real
infrastructure β€” both tiers, streaming archival, tier-split queries, reproducible
reads, completeness, multi-table sessions and both serving surfaces.

**734 tests**: unit, property, and integration against real PostgreSQL 16 and a
real Iceberg warehouse, plus an independently implemented correctness oracle over
generated workloads, covering both record shapes. **DuckDB** and **PyIceberg**
read the output and agree with it. Compression against PostgreSQL row storage is
**measured** rather than targeted β€” ~109Γ— (457 B/row against 4.2 B/row; the
measurement suite carries the caveats).

Missing: query-latency benchmarks on reference hardware, so the p99 targets remain
aspirational; Spark and Trino interop; a CLI. Compaction and general orphan-file
cleanup are
[blocked upstream](https://hupe1980.github.io/meterstore/docs/operations/#maintenance-that-is-not-implemented).

## Development

Requires a Rust toolchain and, for integration tests, a running Docker daemon.

```bash
just            # list all recipes
just dev        # format + unit tests (no Docker)
just test       # full suite
just check      # everything CI runs
just site       # serve the documentation site
```

The integration suites are **one test binary against one PostgreSQL container**.
Cargo would otherwise compile each file under `tests/` into its own statically
linked executable β€” twenty-odd full copies of DataFusion, Arrow, Iceberg, sqlx and
tonic, about 9 GB, which exhausts a CI runner's disk and fails as a linker bus
error rather than as "no space left". A container per test cost seven times the
wall clock of a database per test, for the same isolation.

`datafusion`, `arrow`, `iceberg`, `parquet`, `metering`, `time`, `rust_decimal`
and `sqlx` must each appear exactly once in the dependency graph; `just deps`
fails the build otherwise. Two versions of `arrow` mean two incompatible
`RecordBatch` types, and two of `sqlx` mean two incompatible `PgPool` types β€”
neither fails obviously.

## License

Dual-licensed under [MIT](LICENSE-MIT) or [Apache-2.0](LICENSE-APACHE), at your
option. Part of the [mako](https://github.com/hupe1980/mako) platform.