Please check the build logs for more information.
See Builds for ideas on how to fix a failed build, or Metadata for how to configure docs.rs builds.
If you believe this is docs.rs' fault, open an issue.
MeterStore
Hot/cold tiered storage for metering time series. PostgreSQL holds the recent interval window at low latency; Apache Iceberg holds the history at analytical scale. A single explicit timestamp separates them, and one SQL statement spans both.
π Documentation Β· API reference Β· Changelog
Pre-alpha, and unpublished on purpose. Storage, tiering, archival, querying, reproducible reads and completeness work end to end against real PostgreSQL 16 and a real Iceberg warehouse. The API is still settling; integrating against a real workload is what settles it.
The problem
An intelligent measuring system produces one value per measuring point, per OBIS code, per interval. Fifteen minutes is the German settlement grain:
| Scale | Rows/day | Rows/year |
|---|---|---|
| 10 k measuring points | ~1 M | ~350 M |
| 100 k (mid-size utility) | ~9.6 M | ~3.5 B |
| 1 M (metering operator) | ~96 M | ~35 B |
Retention is regulatory β years to decades for the settlement record. PostgreSQL handles the first row comfortably, the second with care, and the third not at all without becoming a full-time job.
But the operational workload genuinely needs Postgres: recent data is written continuously, corrected, and read transactionally by billing and market communication. Meanwhile settlement, forecasting and grid analysis scan years across hundreds of thousands of meters β an object-storage-and-columnar-format problem.
The data has a natural split most systems refuse to exploit: recent intervals are hot and still being corrected; historical intervals are cold and settled. The boundary between them is a timestamp.
How it works
MeterInterval.from ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββΆ
ββββββ Iceberg (cold, settled) βββββΆβ
ββββ Postgres (hot) βββΆβ
epoch tiering_watermark now
A row's interval start alone decides its tier, so the tiers are disjoint by construction β no deduplication, no merge, no double-counting. Four decisions carry most of the weight:
- The watermark lives inside the Iceberg snapshot. Archival writes the tier boundary into the snapshot summary in the same commit as the data. Iceberg commits are a compare-and-swap, so rows and boundary become durable together or not at all.
- Purge is
DROP TABLE, neverDELETEβ and deferred. An archived window is exactly one partition: detached when it is read, dropped a cycle later once no query planned against the old boundary can still need it. Deleting a day of readings for 100 k meters row by row would leave ~9.6 M dead tuples for autovacuum. - Corrections are versions, not overwrites. MSCONS corrects a value by
versioning it, so the store needs only Iceberg's
appendβ and a past settlement stays reproducible. - Nothing on the archival path holds a window. Peak memory is the chunk size, not the ~9.6 M-row window.
Quick start
Without writing a program:
meterstore query runs SQL across both tiers and prints the boundary the answer
was computed against; meterstore completeness --month 2026-06 reports which
channels are short before a settlement run trusts a SUM; meterstore erasures
prints the audit trail a regulator asks for; meterstore maintain is the archival
loop as a foreground process.
The CLI β
As a library:
use *;
use PostgresHot;
use Arc;
use Duration;
let hot = new; // a pool you already own
let cold = IcebergSqlCatalog .build.await?.cold;
let store = builder
.hot
.cold
.table
.build
.await?;
store.create_tables.await?;
Then write and read:
// Routes each interval to the tier that owns it.
store.append.await?;
// One statement, both tiers β with the boundary it was computed against.
let result = store.query.await?;
result.watermark; // where cold ended and hot began
result.touched_hot_tier; // whether the answer is only valid for now
That is the quick start. Everything a deployment declares beyond it β the two record shapes, identity versus attribute columns, checked identifiers, scoping, completeness, erasure, settlement reruns β is on the documentation site, indexed below rather than repeated here.
Requirements
| Version | Why | |
|---|---|---|
| Rust | 1.94 | Set by the dependency floor (metering, iceberg) |
| PostgreSQL | 12 or later | ATTACH PARTITION takes only SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE on the parent from 12 β see below |
metering |
0.23 or later | The domain layer β MeterStore stores its types, it does not redefine them |
| Apache Iceberg | format v2 | Deliberately not v3 |
Partition creation runs on the write path, and CREATE TABLE β¦ PARTITION OF
takes ACCESS EXCLUSIVE on the parent β which, since PostgreSQL grants locks in
arrival order, lets one long query stall every subsequent insert. Partitions are
built standalone and attached instead.
Locks β
The cold tier takes any Arc<dyn Catalog> β SQL, REST, Polaris, Lakekeeper,
Glue β and that seam is driven end to end by the test suite rather than asserted.
Three are built for you: a PostgreSQL-backed SQL catalogue on the same database as
the hot tier (sql-catalog, on by default), a REST catalogue (rest-catalog, on
by default), and AWS S3 Tables behind the s3tables feature. A configuration file
builds whichever it names β all three, by catalog = "sql" | "rest" | "s3tables" β
and Settings::connect() returns the pool, both tiers and every validated table.
Details.
MeterStore needs only SELECT plus ownership of its own tables: no server
configuration, no restart, and no extension beyond btree_gist, which ships in
contrib and is created on demand. That is what makes it deployable on RDS, Cloud
SQL and Azure Postgres, where an extension-based approach is not.
Relationship to metering
metering β what a measurement is, and how to compute with it (zero I/O, no async)
meterstore β where it lives, how it is tiered, how it is queried (all I/O)
metering owns intervals, units, quality
flags, DST-correct calendars, the identifiers (MaloId, MeloId, BdewCode, Eic),
validation, Ersatzwertbildung, gas conversion and aggregation. MeterStore adds
exactly three things: correction versioning, the transaction-time axis,
and the tiering boundary.
That boundary is deliberate. Duplicating a domain rule here β a unit conversion, a DST calendar β would create a second implementation to keep correct, and it would drift.
Documentation
| Getting started | Requirements, install, a store over both tiers |
| Architecture | The watermark, the invariant, crash-safe archival |
| Storage model | Columns, the merge key, identity vs attribute, constraints |
| Writing readings | Routed writes, bulk ingest, idempotent redelivery |
| Querying | SQL across tiers, provenance, the typed series API |
| Reproducibility | Settlement reruns on two independent time axes |
| Completeness | DST-aware gap detection, including the channel that delivered nothing |
| Operations | Scheduling, locks, system tables, metrics, failure matrix |
| The CLI | meterstore β check, create, status, archive, maintain, query, audit, serve |
| External engines | Spark, Trino, DuckDB β and the trap to avoid |
| Privacy and retention | Pseudonymisation, and the three-year duty as a scheduled job |
| Configuration | TOML over the same validated types |
Status
Everything the documentation describes works end to end against real infrastructure β both tiers, streaming archival, tier-split queries, reproducible reads, completeness, multi-table sessions and both serving surfaces.
953 tests: unit, property, doc and integration against real PostgreSQL 16 and a real Iceberg warehouse, plus an independently implemented correctness oracle over generated workloads, covering both record shapes. Ingest, archival and reads also run against one table at once, which is the only way to reach the states that exist between two steps rather than inside one β and two replicas over separate connection pools race to archive one table, which is the shape the archive lease exists for. DuckDB and PyIceberg read the output and agree with it, down to the audit trail's timestamps. The lock behaviour is asserted against a real server holding a real conflicting lock, not argued. Compression against PostgreSQL row storage is measured rather than targeted β ~109Γ (457 B/row against 4.2 B/row; the measurement suite carries the caveats).
Missing: query-latency benchmarks on reference hardware, so the p99 targets remain
aspirational; Spark and Trino interop; a long-horizon soak, and two replicas as
two processes rather than two pools β so a crash mid-lease is argued rather than
run. Compaction and general orphan-file cleanup
run out of band,
because iceberg-rust exposes neither.
Development
Requires a Rust toolchain and, for integration tests, a running Docker daemon.
The integration suites are one test binary against one PostgreSQL container.
Cargo would otherwise compile each file under tests/ into its own statically
linked executable β twenty-odd full copies of DataFusion, Arrow, Iceberg, sqlx and
tonic, about 9 GB, which exhausts a CI runner's disk and fails as a linker bus
error rather than as "no space left". A container per test cost seven times the
wall clock of a database per test, for the same isolation.
datafusion, arrow, iceberg, parquet, metering, time, rust_decimal,
sqlx and sqlx-postgres must each appear exactly once in the dependency graph;
just deps fails the build otherwise. Two versions of arrow mean two incompatible
RecordBatch types, and two of sqlx mean two incompatible PgPool types β
neither fails obviously.
License
Dual-licensed under MIT or Apache-2.0, at your option. Part of the mako platform.