meterstore 0.13.0

Hot/cold tiered store for metering time series β€” PostgreSQL for the recent window, Apache Iceberg for history.
docs.rs failed to build meterstore-0.13.0
Please check the build logs for more information.
See Builds for ideas on how to fix a failed build, or Metadata for how to configure docs.rs builds.
If you believe this is docs.rs' fault, open an issue.
Visit the last successful build: meterstore-0.11.0

MeterStore

Hot/cold tiered storage for metering time series. PostgreSQL holds the recent interval window at low latency; Apache Iceberg holds the history at analytical scale. A single explicit timestamp separates them, and one SQL statement spans both.

CI License

πŸ“– Documentation Β· API reference Β· Changelog

Pre-alpha, and unpublished on purpose. Storage, tiering, archival, querying, reproducible reads and completeness work end to end against real PostgreSQL 16 and a real Iceberg warehouse. The API is still settling; integrating against a real workload is what settles it.


The problem

An intelligent measuring system produces one value per measuring point, per OBIS code, per interval. Fifteen minutes is the German settlement grain:

Scale Rows/day Rows/year
10 k measuring points ~1 M ~350 M
100 k (mid-size utility) ~9.6 M ~3.5 B
1 M (metering operator) ~96 M ~35 B

Retention is regulatory β€” years to decades for the settlement record. PostgreSQL handles the first row comfortably, the second with care, and the third not at all without becoming a full-time job.

But the operational workload genuinely needs Postgres: recent data is written continuously, corrected, and read transactionally by billing and market communication. Meanwhile settlement, forecasting and grid analysis scan years across hundreds of thousands of meters β€” an object-storage-and-columnar-format problem.

The data has a natural split most systems refuse to exploit: recent intervals are hot and still being corrected; historical intervals are cold and settled. The boundary between them is a timestamp.

How it works

  MeterInterval.from ─────────────────────────────────────▢

  │◀──── Iceberg (cold, settled) ────▢│
                                      │◀── Postgres (hot) ──▢│
  epoch                       tiering_watermark            now

A row's interval start alone decides its tier, so the tiers are disjoint by construction β€” no deduplication, no merge, no double-counting. Four decisions carry most of the weight:

  • The watermark lives inside the Iceberg snapshot. Archival writes the tier boundary into the snapshot summary in the same commit as the data. Iceberg commits are a compare-and-swap, so rows and boundary become durable together or not at all.
  • Purge is DROP TABLE, never DELETE β€” and deferred. An archived window is exactly one partition: detached when it is read, dropped a cycle later once no query planned against the old boundary can still need it. Deleting a day of readings for 100 k meters row by row would leave ~9.6 M dead tuples for autovacuum.
  • Corrections are versions, not overwrites. MSCONS corrects a value by versioning it, so the store needs only Iceberg's append β€” and a past settlement stays reproducible.
  • Nothing on the archival path holds a window. Peak memory is the chunk size, not the ~9.6 M-row window.

How tiering works β†’

Quick start

Without writing a program:

cargo install meterstore --features cli

meterstore init      # a commented starter configuration
meterstore check     # full validation β€” no database needed
meterstore create    # both tiers, every declared table
meterstore status    # boundary, lag, write runway, health

meterstore query runs SQL across both tiers and prints the boundary the answer was computed against; meterstore completeness --month 2026-06 reports which channels are short before a settlement run trusts a SUM; meterstore erasures prints the audit trail a regulator asks for; meterstore maintain is the archival loop as a foreground process. The CLI β†’

As a library:

cargo add meterstore
use meterstore::prelude::*;
use meterstore::hot::PostgresHot;
use std::sync::Arc;
use time::Duration;

let hot = Arc::new(PostgresHot::new(pool));   // a pool you already own

let cold = IcebergSqlCatalog {
    database_url: &db_url,
    warehouse_uri: "s3://bucket/warehouse",   // or file:// memory:// gs:// abfss://
    catalog_name: "meterstore",
    namespace: "metering",
    file_target_bytes: 512 * 1024 * 1024,
    metadata_pool_max_connections: 4,
    auth: &WarehouseAuth { region: Some("eu-central-1".into()), ..Default::default() },
}.build().await?.cold();

let store = MeterStore::builder()
    .hot(hot)
    .cold(cold.clone(), cold.table_provider("readings_versions").await?)
    .table(
        TableConfig::new("readings_versions")
            .settlement_lag(Duration::days(7))
            .archival_step(Duration::DAY)
            .build()?,
    )
    .build()
    .await?;

store.create_tables().await?;

Then write and read:

// Routes each interval to the tier that owns it.
store.append(&[stored_series]).await?;

// One statement, both tiers β€” with the boundary it was computed against.
let result = store.query(r#"
    SELECT meter_local_day("from") AS day, SUM(value) AS kwh
    FROM readings
    WHERE malo_id = '41373559241'
      AND "from" >= '2025-01-01' AND "from" < '2026-01-01'
    GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY 1
"#).await?;

result.watermark();        // where cold ended and hot began
result.touched_hot_tier(); // whether the answer is only valid for now

That is the quick start. Everything a deployment declares beyond it β€” the two record shapes, identity versus attribute columns, checked identifiers, scoping, completeness, erasure, settlement reruns β€” is on the documentation site, indexed below rather than repeated here.

Getting started β†’

Requirements

Version Why
Rust 1.94 Set by the dependency floor (metering, iceberg)
PostgreSQL 12 or later ATTACH PARTITION takes only SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE on the parent from 12 β€” see below
metering 0.23 or later The domain layer β€” MeterStore stores its types, it does not redefine them
Apache Iceberg format v2 Deliberately not v3

Partition creation runs on the write path, and CREATE TABLE … PARTITION OF takes ACCESS EXCLUSIVE on the parent β€” which, since PostgreSQL grants locks in arrival order, lets one long query stall every subsequent insert. Partitions are built standalone and attached instead. Locks β†’

The cold tier takes any Arc<dyn Catalog> β€” SQL, REST, Polaris, Lakekeeper, Glue β€” and that seam is driven end to end by the test suite rather than asserted. Three are built for you: a PostgreSQL-backed SQL catalogue on the same database as the hot tier (sql-catalog, on by default), a REST catalogue (rest-catalog, on by default), and AWS S3 Tables behind the s3tables feature. A configuration file builds whichever it names β€” all three, by catalog = "sql" | "rest" | "s3tables" β€” and Settings::connect() returns the pool, both tiers and every validated table. Details.

MeterStore needs only SELECT plus ownership of its own tables: no server configuration, no restart, and no extension beyond btree_gist, which ships in contrib and is created on demand. That is what makes it deployable on RDS, Cloud SQL and Azure Postgres, where an extension-based approach is not.

Relationship to metering

metering    β†’ what a measurement is, and how to compute with it   (zero I/O, no async)
meterstore  β†’ where it lives, how it is tiered, how it is queried  (all I/O)

metering owns intervals, units, quality flags, DST-correct calendars, the identifiers (MaloId, MeloId, BdewCode, Eic), validation, Ersatzwertbildung, gas conversion and aggregation. MeterStore adds exactly three things: correction versioning, the transaction-time axis, and the tiering boundary.

That boundary is deliberate. Duplicating a domain rule here β€” a unit conversion, a DST calendar β€” would create a second implementation to keep correct, and it would drift.

Documentation

Getting started Requirements, install, a store over both tiers
Architecture The watermark, the invariant, crash-safe archival
Storage model Columns, the merge key, identity vs attribute, constraints
Writing readings Routed writes, bulk ingest, idempotent redelivery
Querying SQL across tiers, provenance, the typed series API
Reproducibility Settlement reruns on two independent time axes
Completeness DST-aware gap detection, including the channel that delivered nothing
Operations Scheduling, locks, system tables, metrics, failure matrix
The CLI meterstore β€” check, create, status, archive, maintain, query, audit, serve
External engines Spark, Trino, DuckDB β€” and the trap to avoid
Privacy and retention Pseudonymisation, and the three-year duty as a scheduled job
Configuration TOML over the same validated types

Status

Everything the documentation describes works end to end against real infrastructure β€” both tiers, streaming archival, tier-split queries, reproducible reads, completeness, multi-table sessions and both serving surfaces.

953 tests: unit, property, doc and integration against real PostgreSQL 16 and a real Iceberg warehouse, plus an independently implemented correctness oracle over generated workloads, covering both record shapes. Ingest, archival and reads also run against one table at once, which is the only way to reach the states that exist between two steps rather than inside one β€” and two replicas over separate connection pools race to archive one table, which is the shape the archive lease exists for. DuckDB and PyIceberg read the output and agree with it, down to the audit trail's timestamps. The lock behaviour is asserted against a real server holding a real conflicting lock, not argued. Compression against PostgreSQL row storage is measured rather than targeted β€” ~109Γ— (457 B/row against 4.2 B/row; the measurement suite carries the caveats).

Missing: query-latency benchmarks on reference hardware, so the p99 targets remain aspirational; Spark and Trino interop; a long-horizon soak, and two replicas as two processes rather than two pools β€” so a crash mid-lease is argued rather than run. Compaction and general orphan-file cleanup run out of band, because iceberg-rust exposes neither.

Development

Requires a Rust toolchain and, for integration tests, a running Docker daemon.

just            # list all recipes
just dev        # format + unit tests (no Docker)
just test       # full suite
just check      # everything CI runs
just cli status # run the command-line tool from source
just site       # serve the documentation site

The integration suites are one test binary against one PostgreSQL container. Cargo would otherwise compile each file under tests/ into its own statically linked executable β€” twenty-odd full copies of DataFusion, Arrow, Iceberg, sqlx and tonic, about 9 GB, which exhausts a CI runner's disk and fails as a linker bus error rather than as "no space left". A container per test cost seven times the wall clock of a database per test, for the same isolation.

datafusion, arrow, iceberg, parquet, metering, time, rust_decimal, sqlx and sqlx-postgres must each appear exactly once in the dependency graph; just deps fails the build otherwise. Two versions of arrow mean two incompatible RecordBatch types, and two of sqlx mean two incompatible PgPool types β€” neither fails obviously.

License

Dual-licensed under MIT or Apache-2.0, at your option. Part of the mako platform.