Matchcore
Matchcore is a high-performance order book and price-time matching engine implemented as a single-threaded, deterministic, in-memory state machine.
It is designed for building low-latency trading systems, exchange simulators, and market-microstructure research tools.
The architecture follows principles popularized by the LMAX Architecture, prioritizing deterministic execution, minimal synchronization, and predictable performance.
Features
- Price-time priority matching engine
- Deterministic state machine execution
- Single-threaded design for minimal latency
- Efficient in-memory order book
- Support for advanced order types and flags (e.g., iceberg, pegged, time-in-force)
- Designed for integration with event-driven trading systems
- Clear command → outcome model for reproducible execution
What’s New in v0.2
This release introduces a redesigned time-priority model, significantly improves amend performance, and adds several developer-focused features.
-
Time-priority model overhaul
Orders now use an explicittime_priorityfield instead of relying on order IDs, enabling more accurate and flexible priority handling. -
Fair priority between limit and pegged orders
Matching priority is now determined bytime_priorityand reprice timing. Pegged orders no longer implicitly rank below limit orders, resulting in more realistic market behavior. -
Improved amend performance
Amend operations are significantly faster (~10-25%) due to the introduction of slab-backed price levels, reducing lookup overhead. -
Optional Serde support
Adds aserdefeature flag to enable serialization and deserialization without imposing it on all users. -
Benchmark-driven documentation
Introduces amake bench-docstarget to automatically generate documentation from benchmark results.
Architecture
The design is heavily inspired by the LMAX architecture, a model widely used in low-latency trading systems.
Core principles include:
- Single-threaded state machine
- Event-driven command processing
- Deterministic execution
- In-memory data structures
These design choices eliminate synchronization overhead while guaranteeing reproducible behavior.
Single-threaded
For an order book of a single instrument, events must be processed strictly sequentially.
Each event mutates the state of the book and the result of one event directly affects the next. Parallelizing matching for the same instrument therefore provides no performance benefit while introducing locking, contention, and complexity.
Running the matching engine on a single thread provides several advantages:
- No locks, contention, or synchronization overhead
- Predictable latency
- Simpler correctness guarantees
This does not mean the entire application must be single-threaded.
A typical architecture may look like:
Command Reader/Decoder → Ring Buffer → Matchcore Engine → Ring Buffer → Execution Outcome Encoder/Writer
Systems can scale horizontally by sharding instruments across multiple engine threads.
For example:
Thread 1 → BTC-USD order book
Thread 2 → ETH-USD order book
Thread 3 → SOL-USD order book
Deterministic
Matchcore operates as a pure deterministic state machine.
Given:
- The same initial state
- The same sequence of commands
the engine will always produce exactly the same results.
This property enables:
- Deterministic replay
- Offline backtesting
- Simulation environments
- Auditability
- Event-sourced architectures
Deterministic execution is particularly valuable for trading systems where correctness and reproducibility are critical.
In-memory
All state is maintained entirely in memory.
The order book, price levels, and internal queues are optimized for fast access and minimal allocations.
This design provides:
- Extremely low latency
- Predictable performance
- Efficient memory access patterns
Persistence and replication are expected to be handled outside the engine, typically through event logs and snapshots.
Core Concepts
Matchcore processes commands and produces outcomes.
Command → Matchcore Engine → Outcome
Commands represent user intent:
- Submit order
- Amend order
- Cancel order
Outcomes describe the result of execution:
- Applied successfully
- Rejected because the command is invalid or cannot be executed in the current state of the order book
Successfully applied commands may also produce:
- Trades
- Order state changes
- Triggered orders
Example
use *;
let mut book = new;
let outcome = book.execute;
println!;
More examples can be found in the examples directory.
Supported Order Features
Matchcore supports the following order types and execution options.
Types
- Market Order: executes immediately against the best available liquidity; optionally supports market-to-limit behavior if not fully filled
- Limit Order: executes at the specified price or better
- Pegged Order: dynamically reprices based on a reference price (e.g., best bid/ask)
Flags
- Post-Only: ensures the order adds liquidity only
- Time-in-Force: defines order lifetime (e.g., GTC, IOC, FOK, GTD)
Quantity Policies
- Standard: fully visible quantity
- Iceberg: partially visible quantity with hidden reserve that replenishes
Peg References
- Primary: pegs to the same-side best price (e.g., best bid for buy)
- Market: pegs to the opposite-side best price (e.g., best ask for buy)
- Mid-Price: pegs to the midpoint between best bid and best ask
Performance
Benchmarks are run with Criterion.
Matchcore is designed for low-latency, single-threaded, deterministic execution.
Representative benchmark results measured on an Apple M4 using Rust stable are shown below.
To run the benchmarks in your environment, run make bench.
Submit
Single-order submit
| Benchmark | Time (median) |
|---|---|
| Single standard order into a fresh book | ~101 ns |
| Single iceberg order into a fresh book | ~103 ns |
| Single post-only order into a fresh book | ~102 ns |
| Single good-till-date order into a fresh book | ~115 ns |
| Single pegged order into a fresh book | ~59 ns |
10k orders submit
| Benchmark | Time (median) |
|---|---|
| 10k standard orders into a fresh book | ~362.20 µs |
| 10k iceberg orders into a fresh book | ~361.04 µs |
| 10k post-only orders into a fresh book | ~361.17 µs |
| 10k good-till-date orders into a fresh book | ~378.40 µs |
| 10k pegged orders into a fresh book | ~271.37 µs |
Amend
Single-order amend
| Benchmark | Time (median) |
|---|---|
| Single order in single-level book quantity decrease | ~825 ns |
| Single order in multi-level book quantity decrease | ~701 ns |
| Single order in single-level book quantity increase | ~844 ns |
| Single order in multi-level book quantity increase | ~751 ns |
| Single order in single-level book price update | ~879 ns |
| Single order in multi-level book price update | ~769 ns |
10k orders amend
| Benchmark | Time (median) |
|---|---|
| 10k orders in single-level book quantity decrease | ~191.24 µs |
| 10k orders in multi-level book quantity decrease | ~180.87 µs |
| 10k orders in single-level book quantity increase | ~205.52 µs |
| 10k orders in multi-level book quantity increase | ~219.19 µs |
| 10k orders in single-level book price update | ~315.16 µs |
| 10k orders in multi-level book price update | ~320.16 µs |
Cancel
| Benchmark | Time (median) |
|---|---|
| Single order in single-level book cancel | ~819 ns |
| Single order in multi-level book cancel | ~686 ns |
| 10k orders in single-level book cancel | ~211.22 µs |
| 10k orders in multi-level book cancel | ~216.68 µs |
Matching
Single-level standard book
| Match volume | Time (median) |
|---|---|
| 1 | ~467 ns |
| 10 | ~476 ns |
| 100 | ~965 ns |
| 1000 | ~3.95 µs |
| 10000 | ~21.13 µs |
Multi-level standard book
| Match volume | Time (median) |
|---|---|
| 1 | ~580 ns |
| 10 | ~585 ns |
| 100 | ~1.12 µs |
| 1000 | ~4.02 µs |
| 10000 | ~21.72 µs |
Single-level iceberg book
| Match volume | Time (median) |
|---|---|
| 1 | ~469 ns |
| 10 | ~639 ns |
| 100 | ~1.95 µs |
| 1000 | ~7.98 µs |
| 10000 | ~66.72 µs |
Multi-level iceberg book
| Match volume | Time (median) |
|---|---|
| 1 | ~575 ns |
| 10 | ~760 ns |
| 100 | ~1.89 µs |
| 1000 | ~7.69 µs |
| 10000 | ~62.70 µs |
Mixed workload
| Benchmark | Time (median) |
|---|---|
| Submit + amend + match + cancel | ~12.69 µs |
Notes
- Benchmark results depend on CPU, compiler version, benchmark configuration, and system load.
- These figures illustrate the general performance profile of the engine rather than serve as universal guarantees.
- Full Criterion output includes confidence intervals and regression comparisons.
Next Steps
Additional Order Features
- Stop orders
- Last-trade peg reference
Potential Performance Improvements
Currently, the order book stores price levels using BTreeMap<Price, LevelId> and Slab<PriceLevel>. This design provides:
- O(log N) best-price lookup
- O(log N) submit operations to locate the corresponding price level
- O(1) amend operations (except when amending the order to a different price level)
- O(1) cancel operations (except when cancelling the order removes the price level entirely)
where N is the number of price levels.
An alternative design is to store prices in Vec<(Price, LevelId)>, sorted by price from worst → best, which provides:
- O(1) best-price lookup
- O(N) insertion / deletion when creating or removing price levels
However, in real-world trading scenarios, most activity occurs near the best price, meaning the effective search distance is often small. This can make a linear scan competitive with tree-based structures for typical workloads.
Makefile
The project uses a Makefile to simplify the development process.
See the Makefile for more details, or run make to see the available commands.
License
Licensed under either of
- Apache License, Version 2.0, (LICENSE-APACHE or https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
- MIT license (LICENSE-MIT or https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
at your option.
Contribution
Contributions are welcome! If you would like to contribute, please follow these steps:
- Fork the repository
- Create a new branch for your changes
- Make your changes
- Run all the checks (
make check) - Submit a pull request
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in matchcore by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0 license, shall be dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or conditions.