marque-rules 0.2.1

// SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2026 Knitli Inc.
//
// SPDX-License-Identifier: LicenseRef-MarqueLicense-1.0

#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
#![cfg_attr(coverage_nightly, feature(coverage_attribute))]

//! marque-rules — trait definitions for the marque rule system.
//!
//! This crate defines the contract every rule crate must satisfy.
//! It has no rule implementations — those live in `marque-capco` and future crates.
//! The engine depends only on this crate, enabling rule crates to be swapped.
//!
//! # Type split: FixProposal vs AppliedFix
//!
//! `FixProposal` is pure data emitted by rules — deterministic, timestamp-free,
//! classifier-free. `AppliedFix` wraps a proposal with runtime context (timestamp,
//! classifier id, dry-run flag) and is constructed **only** by `Engine::fix`.
//! This makes "suggested vs applied" a type-system invariant.

pub mod confidence;

use marque_ism::{IsmAttributes, Span};
use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::sync::Arc;
use std::time::SystemTime;

pub use confidence::{Confidence, FeatureContribution, FeatureId};
pub use marque_ism::{DocumentPosition, MarkingType, Zone};

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// RuleId
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

/// Unique rule identifier string (e.g., "E001", "capco/portion-mark-in-banner").
///
/// The inner `&'static str` is private; construct via [`RuleId::new`] so that
/// construction is explicit at every call site.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash)]
pub struct RuleId(&'static str);

impl RuleId {
    /// Construct a rule identifier from a static string slice.
    #[inline]
    pub const fn new(id: &'static str) -> Self {
        Self(id)
    }

    /// Return the rule identifier as a string slice.
    #[inline]
    pub const fn as_str(&self) -> &'static str {
        self.0
    }
}

impl std::fmt::Display for RuleId {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
        f.write_str(self.0)
    }
}

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Severity
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

/// Rule severity level. Configurable per rule in `.marque.toml`.
///
/// # Ordering
///
/// The derived `Ord` is `Off < Suggest < Info < Warn < Error < Fix`.
/// The ordering is exposed for consumers that want to compare
/// severities (e.g., "is this at least `Error`?") but the config
/// loader does **not** use it as a merge operator today. `Suggest`
/// sits between `Off` and `Info` because it is the lightest
/// firing-but-non-actionable channel — quieter than `Info` (which
/// has no candidate replacement attached) and louder than `Off`
/// (which is non-firing entirely).
///
/// # Exit-code semantics
///
/// `marque check` maps severities to exit codes as follows:
///
/// | Severity counts present       | Exit code              |
/// |-------------------------------|------------------------|
/// | `Error` or `Fix`              | `1` (`EX_DIAG_ERROR`)  |
/// | `Warn` only                   | `2` (`EX_DIAG_WARN`)   |
/// | `Info` / `Suggest` only, none | `0` (`EX_OK`)          |
///
/// `Info` and `Suggest` are the only severities whose diagnostics are
/// emitted *and* keep the exit code at zero. `Warn` still fails CI
/// via `EX_DIAG_WARN`. The tonal distinction is advisory: `Warn`
/// means "this might be wrong"; `Info` means "FYI, probably
/// intentional but worth surfacing"; `Suggest` means "I have a
/// candidate replacement but I'm not confident enough to auto-apply
/// it — eyes on it." Rules like `W034 sci-custom-control-info`
/// (which reports unpublished SCI control systems — legitimate per
/// CAPCO but rare) are natural `Info` candidates; rules like `S004
/// rel-to-trigraph-suggest` (which proposes a higher-prior trigraph
/// alternative for an ambiguous REL TO entry) emit at `Suggest`.
///
/// # `Suggest` channel semantics
///
/// `Suggest` is the firing-but-non-applying channel: a diagnostic
/// emitted at `Suggest` carries a candidate `FixProposal` that the
/// engine will **never** auto-apply, regardless of `confidence`. The
/// fix is informational — it tells the user what the rule would
/// suggest if confidence were higher. Two paths produce
/// `Suggest`-severity diagnostics:
///
/// 1. **Explicit emission**: a rule constructs the diagnostic with
///    `Severity::Suggest` directly. `S004 rel-to-trigraph-suggest`
///    is the first such rule.
/// 2. **Engine rewrite**: any diagnostic whose attached `FixProposal`
///    has `confidence.combined() < confidence_threshold` is rewritten
///    to `Severity::Suggest` by the engine in `lint`. This subsumes
///    the prior silent-drop behavior at threshold-gate time so
///    below-threshold proposals stay observable.
///
/// In both cases, `Engine::fix` filters out `Suggest` diagnostics
/// from auto-apply by construction. `Suggest` diagnostics with
/// `fix: None` are also valid (informational suggestion with no
/// candidate replacement — used by future rules like #206's
/// REL TO opaque-uncertain reduction, where the rule has signal
/// to surface but no specific replacement to propose); the
/// renderer handles the missing-fix case cleanly.
///
/// # Merge semantics (current: last-write-wins)
///
/// `marque-config` merges layers in strict precedence order — env vars
/// override `.marque.local.toml` which overrides `.marque.toml`. Whatever
/// the highest-precedence layer says for a given rule wins, including
/// downgrades: a local override of `"off"` will suppress a project-config
/// `"error"`. This is intentional — individual classifiers sometimes need
/// to silence a rule while iterating, and the audit log still records the
/// configured severity for every applied fix.
///
/// If a future policy requires strictness-only merging (where a lower
/// layer cannot downgrade a higher layer's severity), change the loader
/// to `.max()` over `Severity::parse_config` values rather than `extend`.
/// The derived `Ord` above is already the correct operator for that case.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash)]
pub enum Severity {
    /// Rule is disabled entirely. FR-008: severity=off is unrepresentable on emitted diagnostics
    /// — a rule at `Off` never fires, so no `Diagnostic` is produced.
    Off,
    /// Advisory channel — diagnostic carries a candidate fix that
    /// will **not** auto-apply.
    ///
    /// Distinct from `Info` (FYI, no actionable replacement) and
    /// from `Off` (non-firing). The fix-bearing diagnostic remains
    /// visible in lint output but the engine excludes it from
    /// auto-apply regardless of `confidence`. This is the
    /// suggest-don't-fix channel: rules with low-confidence
    /// candidate corrections (e.g., `S004 rel-to-trigraph-suggest`)
    /// can surface "did you mean?" hints without committing to the
    /// rewrite.
    ///
    /// `Suggest` keeps the CLI exit code at `0` (same as `Info`),
    /// so it is CI-silent.
    Suggest,
    /// Emit informational diagnostic; does not block `check`-mode exit
    /// code. Intended for "audit-visible but probably intentional"
    /// signals — cases where the marking may be correct but the user
    /// may want to verify (e.g., unpublished SCI control systems).
    Info,
    /// Emit warning; non-error, but still non-zero in `check` mode
    /// (produces `EX_DIAG_WARN` = 2). Different from `Info` in tone
    /// *and* exit-code impact: Warn is "this might be wrong" and
    /// CI-visible; Info is "FYI, probably intentional but worth
    /// surfacing" and CI-silent (exit 0).
    Warn,
    /// Emit error; blocks `--check` exit code.
    Error,
    /// Apply fix automatically when `--fix` flag is present.
    Fix,
}

impl Severity {
    /// Parse a severity level from a config string. Returns `None` for
    /// unrecognized values; the config loader treats `None` as a hard error.
    pub fn parse_config(s: &str) -> Option<Self> {
        match s {
            "off" => Some(Self::Off),
            "suggest" => Some(Self::Suggest),
            "info" => Some(Self::Info),
            "warn" => Some(Self::Warn),
            "error" => Some(Self::Error),
            "fix" => Some(Self::Fix),
            _ => None,
        }
    }

    /// Canonical lowercase string form, suitable for JSON output.
    ///
    /// This is the inverse of [`Severity::parse_config`] and is the stable
    /// surface that JSON consumers should depend on — never `format!("{:?}")`
    /// (which exposes Debug formatting as an unintended API).
    pub const fn as_str(self) -> &'static str {
        match self {
            Self::Off => "off",
            Self::Suggest => "suggest",
            Self::Info => "info",
            Self::Warn => "warn",
            Self::Error => "error",
            Self::Fix => "fix",
        }
    }
}

impl std::fmt::Display for Severity {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
        f.write_str(self.as_str())
    }
}

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// RuleContext
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

/// Document position context passed to rules alongside parsed markings.
///
/// Phase 3 made `zone` and `position` `Option`-typed: the scanner cannot
/// reliably determine header/footer/body or document position from raw
/// text alone, so a rule that reads either field must handle `None`.
/// They will become populated in a future scanner pass that consumes
/// document structural metadata (page count, line numbers, header/footer
/// detection on extracted documents).
///
/// `page_context` is populated by the engine for every non-portion
/// candidate (Banner, CAB) so banner-validation rules can compare the
/// observed banner against the composite expected from all preceding
/// portions. The engine resets it at scanner-emitted `MarkingType::PageBreak`
/// candidates (form-feed `\f` and `\n\n\n+` heuristics) so the context
/// reflects only the current page.
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct RuleContext {
    pub marking_type: MarkingType,
    /// Document zone (header/footer/body/CAB) when known. `None` in Phase 3
    /// — the scanner cannot prove header vs footer from raw text.
    pub zone: Option<Zone>,
    /// Coarse document position when known. `None` in Phase 3.
    pub position: Option<DocumentPosition>,
    /// Accumulated portion data for the current page, reset at every
    /// scanner-emitted `MarkingType::PageBreak`.
    pub page_context: Option<std::sync::Arc<marque_ism::PageContext>>,
    /// Organization-specific corrections map from config `[corrections]`.
    /// `None` when no corrections are configured.
    pub corrections: Option<Arc<HashMap<String, String>>>,
}

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// FixSource
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

/// Provenance of a fix proposal — where the fix recommendation originated.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
pub enum FixSource {
    /// Hand-written Layer 2 CAPCO rule.
    BuiltinRule,
    /// User `[corrections]` entry (FR-009).
    CorrectionsMap,
    /// Deterministic deprecated-marking conversion (FR-004a).
    MigrationTable,
    /// Probabilistic decoder produced this fix from a recognition
    /// candidate's posterior (Phase D, see
    /// `docs/plans/2026-04-16-probabilistic-recognition.md`). Paired
    /// with a non-trivial `features` list in
    /// [`FixProposal::confidence`] so auditors can reconstruct the
    /// scoring path.
    DecoderPosterior,
    /// Decoder produced this fix via a position-aware short-token
    /// classification heuristic — a keyboard-proximity table applied
    /// to the leading classification slot of a portion or banner
    /// marking when the token is too short for vocab-based fuzzy
    /// matching (e.g., `(YS//NF) → (TS//NF)`, `(W//NF) → (S//NF)`).
    /// See issue #133 PR 2.
    ///
    /// The heuristic is inherently less certain than a fuzzy-vocab
    /// match because the inference is "this token is keyboard-
    /// adjacent to a known classification" rather than "this token
    /// is edit-distance ≤ 2 from a known canonical token in a
    /// closed vocabulary." The engine therefore (a) emits the
    /// diagnostic at [`Severity::Warn`] (the fix-and-warn pattern —
    /// always visible, non-zero exit code in `--check`), and
    /// (b) caps [`Confidence::rule`] at `0.80` so `combined ≤ 0.80`
    /// stays below the default `confidence_threshold` of `0.95`.
    /// The fix only auto-applies when the user has explicitly
    /// lowered the threshold to opt into the heuristic's bar.
    DecoderClassificationHeuristic,
}

/// Canonical citation string for diagnostics whose authority is the user's
/// `[corrections]` config entry (C001 and the engine's pre-scanner text-scan
/// path). C001 is not a CAPCO rule — no CAPCO passage governs user-defined
/// typo replacements — so the citation is a config pointer rather than a
/// §/page/line reference. Holding the string in one place prevents silent
/// drift between the rule-pipeline emission site in `marque-capco` and the
/// pre-scanner emission site in `marque-engine`; both paths produce the
/// same audit-record shape.
pub const CORRECTIONS_MAP_CITATION: &str = "CONFIG:[corrections]";

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// FixProposal
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

/// A proposed fix for a diagnostic violation.
///
/// Pure data — deterministic, timestamp-free, classifier-free, safe to snapshot
/// in tests. A `FixProposal` is a *suggestion* until `Engine::fix` promotes it
/// to an `AppliedFix` when `confidence.combined() >= configuration.confidence_threshold`.
///
/// # Phase D: Multi-axis confidence
///
/// `confidence` is a [`Confidence`] record rather than a scalar. Strict-path
/// rules construct it via [`Confidence::strict`]; the Phase D decoder
/// constructs a full record with `recognition`, `runner_up_ratio`, and
/// feature contributions. The engine threshold gate uses
/// [`Confidence::combined`] so a 0.95-recognition × 0.9-rule fix that
/// previously would have been scalar-0.855 still gates the same way.
#[non_exhaustive]
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct FixProposal {
    /// The rule that generated this proposal.
    pub rule: RuleId,
    /// Provenance: built-in rule, corrections map, migration table, or
    /// decoder posterior.
    pub source: FixSource,
    /// Byte range in original source to replace.
    pub span: Span,
    /// The bytes currently occupying `span`.
    pub original: Box<str>,
    /// Replacement text.
    pub replacement: Box<str>,
    /// Multi-axis confidence for this fix.
    pub confidence: Confidence,
    /// Reference to the CAPCO rule or migration document justifying this fix.
    pub migration_ref: Option<&'static str>,
}

impl FixProposal {
    /// Create a new fix proposal with invariant checks.
    ///
    /// # Panics
    ///
    /// Panics if `confidence` fails [`Confidence::validate`] — i.e.,
    /// any individual axis is out of range or `NaN` / non-finite. The
    /// per-axis check is the load-bearing one: `combined() =
    /// recognition × rule` can land in `[0.0, 1.0]` for individually-
    /// invalid axes (e.g., `recognition = 2.0`, `rule = 0.4` ⇒
    /// `combined = 0.8`), so validating only the product would let an
    /// invalid record through. The check runs in release builds (not
    /// just debug) because `NaN` silently fails every threshold
    /// comparison and `INFINITY` silently bypasses every threshold —
    /// both are correctness-impacting bugs in release.
    pub fn new(
        rule: RuleId,
        source: FixSource,
        span: Span,
        original: impl Into<Box<str>>,
        replacement: impl Into<Box<str>>,
        confidence: Confidence,
        migration_ref: Option<&'static str>,
    ) -> Self {
        if let Err(msg) = confidence.validate() {
            panic!("FixProposal invalid confidence: {msg}");
        }
        Self {
            rule,
            source,
            span,
            original: original.into(),
            replacement: replacement.into(),
            confidence,
            migration_ref,
        }
    }
}

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// AppliedFix (= Audit Record)
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

/// A promoted `FixProposal` with runtime context.
///
/// Constructed **only** by `Engine::fix` at the moment a `FixProposal` meets
/// the confidence threshold. Never constructed by a rule or suggestion path.
///
/// Serves as the audit record: the NDJSON schemas at `contracts/audit-record*.json`
/// serialize this type.
///
/// `classifier_id` is an `Arc<str>` so promoting many fixes from a single
/// document only clones an atomic refcount, not the underlying string.
///
/// # v2 audit fields (`confidence`, `source`)
///
/// Phase D promotes the fix's [`Confidence`] and [`FixSource`] to
/// **top-level** fields on `AppliedFix` so the v2 audit emitter doesn't
/// need to descend into `.proposal` to find them. They are a snapshot
/// at promotion time — the engine may (in future phases) adjust them
/// for region context before promotion, so they can diverge from the
/// original `proposal.confidence` / `proposal.source`. Today the
/// engine promotes them unchanged from the proposal.
///
/// Both fields are redundant with the `proposal` sub-struct by design:
/// the v1 schema reads them through `proposal`; the v2 schema reads
/// the top-level fields. Keeping both paths live makes the v1→v2
/// transition a pure emitter change rather than a data-model change.
#[non_exhaustive]
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct AppliedFix {
    /// The original proposal that was applied.
    pub proposal: FixProposal,
    /// Snapshot of the fix's confidence at promotion time (v2 audit).
    pub confidence: Confidence,
    /// Snapshot of the fix's provenance at promotion time (v2 audit).
    pub source: FixSource,
    /// Timestamp of application (clock-injected).
    pub timestamp: SystemTime,
    /// Classifier identity from runtime config. `None` if not configured.
    pub classifier_id: Option<Arc<str>>,
    /// `true` if produced under `--dry-run` (FR-006).
    pub dry_run: bool,
    /// Caller-supplied input identifier (file path, "-" for stdin, `None` if N/A).
    pub input: Option<Arc<str>>,
}

impl AppliedFix {
    /// Promote a `FixProposal` to an `AppliedFix` with runtime context.
    ///
    /// # Engine-only contract (production code)
    ///
    /// This constructor exists in `marque-rules` for type co-location, but
    /// in **production code** **must only be called from
    /// `marque-engine::Engine::fix`**. Rule crates and CLI code must never
    /// construct `AppliedFix` directly — they produce `FixProposal`
    /// values and let the engine promote them.
    ///
    /// The engine snapshots `proposal.confidence` and `proposal.source`
    /// into the top-level `confidence` / `source` fields at promotion
    /// time. A future phase may adjust these per region-context before
    /// snapshotting; Phase 2 copies them unchanged.
    ///
    /// # Type-level seal
    ///
    /// The `_token: EnginePromotionToken` parameter is the seal: an
    /// instance can only be obtained via
    /// [`EnginePromotionToken::__engine_construct`], whose
    /// engine-only contract mirrors this one. Because
    /// `EnginePromotionToken`'s sole field is private to
    /// `marque-rules`, no external crate can brace-construct one — the
    /// bypass surface collapses to a single named type. A grep for
    /// `EnginePromotionToken` outside `marque-engine` (or test code
    /// covered by the carve-out below) flags every Constitution V
    /// violation in one pass.
    ///
    /// The seal is still convention-based at the cross-crate level
    /// (Rust does not provide a way to scope `pub` to a specific
    /// downstream crate without `cfg` features that any caller can
    /// flip), but the convention is now load-bearing at the type
    /// level: the named token threads the bypass through one
    /// auditable choke point instead of leaving it as a single
    /// generically-named function.
    ///
    /// # Test-fixture carve-out
    ///
    /// Test code MAY call `__engine_promote` directly (and mint a
    /// token via [`EnginePromotionToken::__engine_construct`]) to
    /// construct synthetic `AppliedFix` fixtures for unit-testing
    /// audit-emission machinery (renderers, sentinel checks, NDJSON
    /// serialization) without spinning up a full `Engine`. The
    /// carve-out is scoped per Constitution V Principle V:
    ///
    /// - Call sites MUST live inside `#[cfg(test)]` modules, `tests/`
    ///   integration files, or test-utility crates gated as
    ///   `dev-dependencies`. Production code calling this constructor
    ///   from `cfg(not(test))` violates the contract.
    /// - Fabricated `AppliedFix` values MUST NOT be commingled with
    ///   engine-promoted fixes (spliced into a real audit stream,
    ///   etc.).
    /// - The carve-out covers test-fixture *construction* only. CLI
    ///   helpers, batch tooling, and benchmark drivers that want an
    ///   `AppliedFix` for non-test purposes are not in scope.
    ///
    /// Each test call site SHOULD carry an inline comment naming the
    /// carve-out so future reviewers don't have to re-derive the
    /// policy.
    #[doc(hidden)]
    pub fn __engine_promote(
        proposal: FixProposal,
        timestamp: SystemTime,
        classifier_id: Option<Arc<str>>,
        dry_run: bool,
        input: Option<Arc<str>>,
        _token: EnginePromotionToken,
    ) -> Self {
        let confidence = proposal.confidence.clone();
        let source = proposal.source;
        Self {
            proposal,
            confidence,
            source,
            timestamp,
            classifier_id,
            dry_run,
            input,
        }
    }
}

/// Engine-only proof-of-construction token for [`AppliedFix::__engine_promote`].
///
/// `AppliedFix::__engine_promote` accepts an `EnginePromotionToken`; the
/// only way to obtain one is [`EnginePromotionToken::__engine_construct`].
/// Because the token's sole field is private to `marque-rules`, no
/// external crate can brace-construct one, and the constructor is
/// `#[doc(hidden)]` and named to make the bypass intent obvious at the
/// call site.
///
/// This is the type-level seal for Constitution V Principle V's
/// engine-only contract on audit-record promotion. See
/// [`AppliedFix::__engine_promote`] for the binding contract and the
/// test-fixture carve-out.
///
/// # Compile-fail proof of the seal
///
/// External crates cannot brace-construct an `EnginePromotionToken`
/// because the `_seal` field is private to `marque-rules`. Doctests
/// compile as separate crates against the library's public API, so
/// the following snippet is rejected by the compiler — which is what
/// `compile_fail` asserts:
///
/// ```compile_fail
/// // External crates see `EnginePromotionToken` but not `_seal`,
/// // so brace-construction is rejected. Bypass requires calling
/// // `EnginePromotionToken::__engine_construct()`, which is the
/// // single auditable bypass surface.
/// let _token = marque_rules::EnginePromotionToken { _seal: () };
/// ```
#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct EnginePromotionToken {
    _seal: (),
}

impl EnginePromotionToken {
    /// Mint an [`EnginePromotionToken`].
    ///
    /// # Engine-only contract (production code)
    ///
    /// Only `marque-engine` may call this in production code. The
    /// same three-constraint test-fixture carve-out from
    /// [`AppliedFix::__engine_promote`] applies here verbatim — see
    /// that constructor's doc comment for the binding definition.
    /// Outside the engine, calling this from `cfg(not(test))` code
    /// violates Constitution V Principle V.
    #[doc(hidden)]
    #[inline]
    pub const fn __engine_construct() -> Self {
        Self { _seal: () }
    }
}

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Diagnostic
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

/// A single diagnostic emitted by a rule check.
#[non_exhaustive]
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct Diagnostic {
    pub rule: RuleId,
    pub severity: Severity,
    /// Byte span in the original source buffer.
    pub span: Span,
    /// Human-readable description of the violation.
    pub message: Box<str>,
    /// CAPCO section citation, e.g., "CAPCO-2016 §A.6"
    /// (refers to the CAPCO Register and Manual, 2016).
    pub citation: &'static str,
    /// Proposed fix, if the rule can generate one.
    pub fix: Option<FixProposal>,
}

impl Diagnostic {
    /// Construct a new diagnostic.
    pub fn new(
        rule: RuleId,
        severity: Severity,
        span: Span,
        message: impl Into<Box<str>>,
        citation: &'static str,
        fix: Option<FixProposal>,
    ) -> Self {
        Self {
            rule,
            severity,
            span,
            message: message.into(),
            citation,
            fix,
        }
    }
}

// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Rule trait
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

/// The core trait every rule implementation must satisfy.
///
/// Rules are stateless. All configuration (severity overrides, corrections map)
/// is resolved by the engine before rule invocation and passed via context.
pub trait Rule: Send + Sync {
    fn id(&self) -> RuleId;
    fn name(&self) -> &'static str;
    /// Default severity — overridable per rule in `.marque.toml`.
    fn default_severity(&self) -> Severity;
    fn check(&self, attrs: &IsmAttributes, ctx: &RuleContext) -> Vec<Diagnostic>;
}

/// A collection of rules provided by a rule crate.
/// Returned by the rule crate's entry point function.
pub trait RuleSet: Send + Sync {
    fn rules(&self) -> &[Box<dyn Rule>];
    fn schema_version(&self) -> &'static str;
}

#[cfg(test)]
#[cfg_attr(coverage_nightly, coverage(off))]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn rule_id_round_trip() {
        let r = RuleId::new("E001");
        assert_eq!(r.as_str(), "E001");
        assert_eq!(r.to_string(), "E001");
    }

    #[test]
    fn severity_parse_config_accepts_known_values() {
        assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config("off"), Some(Severity::Off));
        assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config("suggest"), Some(Severity::Suggest));
        assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config("info"), Some(Severity::Info));
        assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config("warn"), Some(Severity::Warn));
        assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config("error"), Some(Severity::Error));
        assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config("fix"), Some(Severity::Fix));
    }

    #[test]
    fn severity_parse_config_is_case_sensitive() {
        assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config("OFF"), None);
        assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config("Warn"), None);
    }

    #[test]
    fn severity_parse_config_rejects_unknown_strings() {
        assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config("err"), None);
        assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config("disable"), None);
        assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config(""), None);
    }

    #[test]
    fn severity_display_round_trips() {
        for s in [
            Severity::Off,
            Severity::Suggest,
            Severity::Info,
            Severity::Warn,
            Severity::Error,
            Severity::Fix,
        ] {
            assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config(s.as_str()), Some(s));
            assert_eq!(s.to_string(), s.as_str());
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn severity_ord_off_is_lowest() {
        // Off < Suggest < Info < Warn < Error < Fix — see the doc comment
        // on Severity for the intentional design rationale.
        assert!(Severity::Off < Severity::Suggest);
        assert!(Severity::Suggest < Severity::Info);
        assert!(Severity::Info < Severity::Warn);
        assert!(Severity::Warn < Severity::Error);
        assert!(Severity::Error < Severity::Fix);
    }

    #[test]
    fn severity_suggest_round_trips_through_config_string() {
        // Issue #235 / #186 PR-3: the suggest-don't-fix channel must be
        // a stable parse target. The config string "suggest" must round
        // trip through both parse_config and as_str.
        assert_eq!(Severity::parse_config("suggest"), Some(Severity::Suggest));
        assert_eq!(Severity::Suggest.as_str(), "suggest");
        assert_eq!(Severity::Suggest.to_string(), "suggest");
    }

    #[test]
    fn severity_suggest_is_strictly_below_info_in_ord() {
        // The renderer relies on Suggest sorting BELOW Info so that
        // CI exit-code logic ("Info or none → exit 0") generalizes
        // to ("Info-or-Suggest or none → exit 0") via the same
        // strict-less-than comparison.
        assert!(Severity::Suggest < Severity::Info);
        assert!(Severity::Off < Severity::Suggest);
    }

    #[test]
    fn fix_proposal_new_accepts_boundary_confidence() {
        let _zero = FixProposal::new(
            RuleId::new("E001"),
            FixSource::BuiltinRule,
            Span::new(0, 0),
            "x",
            "y",
            Confidence::strict(0.0),
            None,
        );
        let _one = FixProposal::new(
            RuleId::new("E001"),
            FixSource::BuiltinRule,
            Span::new(0, 0),
            "x",
            "y",
            Confidence::strict(1.0),
            None,
        );
    }

    #[test]
    #[should_panic(expected = "Confidence::strict rule confidence")]
    fn fix_proposal_new_panics_on_negative_confidence() {
        let _ = FixProposal::new(
            RuleId::new("E001"),
            FixSource::BuiltinRule,
            Span::new(0, 0),
            "x",
            "y",
            Confidence::strict(-0.1),
            None,
        );
    }

    #[test]
    #[should_panic(expected = "Confidence::strict rule confidence")]
    fn fix_proposal_new_panics_on_above_one_confidence() {
        let _ = FixProposal::new(
            RuleId::new("E001"),
            FixSource::BuiltinRule,
            Span::new(0, 0),
            "x",
            "y",
            Confidence::strict(1.5),
            None,
        );
    }

    #[test]
    #[should_panic(expected = "Confidence::strict rule confidence")]
    fn fix_proposal_new_panics_on_nan_confidence() {
        let _ = FixProposal::new(
            RuleId::new("E001"),
            FixSource::BuiltinRule,
            Span::new(0, 0),
            "x",
            "y",
            Confidence::strict(f32::NAN),
            None,
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn fix_proposal_new_panics_when_axis_is_nan() {
        // A directly-constructed Confidence can still have NaN axes
        // that slip past the strict-path assert. Verify the
        // FixProposal::new gate catches that case too.
        let bad = Confidence {
            recognition: f32::NAN,
            rule: 1.0,
            region: None,
            runner_up_ratio: None,
            features: Vec::new(),
        };
        let caught = std::panic::catch_unwind(|| {
            FixProposal::new(
                RuleId::new("E001"),
                FixSource::BuiltinRule,
                Span::new(0, 0),
                "x",
                "y",
                bad,
                None,
            );
        });
        assert!(
            caught.is_err(),
            "expected FixProposal::new to panic on NaN recognition axis"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn fix_proposal_new_panics_when_axis_out_of_range() {
        // combined() = recognition × rule can still land in [0, 1]
        // even when an individual axis is out of range
        // (e.g. recognition = 2.0, rule = 0.4 ⇒ combined = 0.8).
        // Validating only the product would let this through; the
        // per-axis check catches it.
        let bad = Confidence {
            recognition: 2.0,
            rule: 0.4,
            region: None,
            runner_up_ratio: None,
            features: Vec::new(),
        };
        // Sanity check: combined() IS in [0, 1] — that's the whole
        // point of adding per-axis validation.
        assert!((0.0..=1.0).contains(&bad.combined()));
        let caught = std::panic::catch_unwind(|| {
            FixProposal::new(
                RuleId::new("E001"),
                FixSource::BuiltinRule,
                Span::new(0, 0),
                "x",
                "y",
                bad,
                None,
            );
        });
        assert!(
            caught.is_err(),
            "expected FixProposal::new to panic on out-of-range recognition axis"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn fix_proposal_new_panics_when_feature_delta_is_nan() {
        let bad = Confidence {
            recognition: 0.9,
            rule: 0.9,
            region: None,
            runner_up_ratio: None,
            features: vec![FeatureContribution {
                id: FeatureId::EditDistance1,
                delta: f32::NAN,
            }],
        };
        let caught = std::panic::catch_unwind(|| {
            FixProposal::new(
                RuleId::new("E001"),
                FixSource::BuiltinRule,
                Span::new(0, 0),
                "x",
                "y",
                bad,
                None,
            );
        });
        assert!(
            caught.is_err(),
            "expected FixProposal::new to panic on NaN feature delta"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn fix_proposal_new_accepts_runner_up_ratio_above_one() {
        // runner_up_ratio can legitimately be > 1.0 — it's a ratio,
        // not a unit interval. Verify the per-axis validator doesn't
        // over-constrain it.
        let ok = Confidence {
            recognition: 0.9,
            rule: 0.9,
            region: None,
            runner_up_ratio: Some(3.5),
            features: Vec::new(),
        };
        let _ = FixProposal::new(
            RuleId::new("E001"),
            FixSource::BuiltinRule,
            Span::new(0, 0),
            "x",
            "y",
            ok,
            None,
        );
    }
}