Mace

Mace is a high-performance, embedded key-value database written in Rust, combining the predictable read performance of B+ Trees with the write throughput of LSM Trees.

Key Features

Hybrid Performance: B+ Tree-like read speeds with LSM-Tree-like write throughput.
Concurrent MVCC: Non-blocking concurrent reads and writes with snapshot isolation.
ACID Transactions: Crash-safe commit, abort, and recovery.
Flash-Optimized: Log-structured design tailored for SSD/NVMe endurance.
Large Value Separation: Large values live outside the index, cutting maintenance I/O.
Merge Operators: Optional per-bucket operators support durable merge operands and reads.
Optional Zstd Compression: Per-bucket enable_compression (default: false).
Data Integrity: CRC checksums on persisted records, verified across restarts and crashes.
Flow Control: Optional foreground write backpressure to bound memory growth.
Cross-Platform: Linux, Windows, FreeBSD and macOS.

Quick Start

The following example demonstrates basic transaction management and data retrieval:

use mace::{BucketOptions, Mace, OpCode, Options};

fn main() -> Result<(), OpCode> {
    // 1. Initialize the storage
    let opts = Options::new("./data_dir");
    let db = Mace::new(opts.validate().unwrap())?;
    let bkt = db.new_bucket("tmp", BucketOptions::default())?;

    // 2. Perform a write transaction
    let txn = bkt.begin()?;
    txn.put("moha", "+1s")?;
    txn.commit()?;

    // 3. Read data using a consistent view
    let view = bkt.view()?;
    let value = view.get("moha")?;
    println!("moha => {:?}", std::str::from_utf8(value.slice()));

    // 4. Remove data
    let txn = bkt.begin()?;
    txn.del("moha")?;
    txn.commit()?;

    Ok(())
}

Additional runnable examples are available in the examples/ directory.

Benchmarks

Mace vs RocksDB on small values, relaxed durability (snapshot reads):

Workload	Mace ops/s	RocksDB ops/s	mace/rocksdb ops	Mace p99	RocksDB p99
W1 (95% Read, 5% Update, 1 thread)	541,950	281,074	1.93x	4	8
W1 (95% Read, 5% Update, 8 threads)	2,941,301	1,100,399	2.67x	8	16
W2 (95% Read, 5% Update, zipf, 1 thread)	1,314,220	824,557	1.59x	2	4
W2 (95% Read, 5% Update, zipf, 8 threads)	4,156,555	1,442,814	2.88x	4	16
W3 (50% Read, 50% Update, 1 thread)	265,720	184,274	1.44x	4	8
W3 (50% Read, 50% Update, 8 threads)	1,306,037	662,721	1.97x	8	16
W4 (5% Read, 95% Update, 1 thread)	177,297	157,432	1.13x	8	8
W4 (5% Read, 95% Update, 8 threads)	707,002	473,584	1.49x	16	16
W5 (70% Read, 25% Update, 5% Scan, 1 thread)	261,862	163,576	1.60x	16	16
W5 (70% Read, 25% Update, 5% Scan, 8 threads)	1,475,692	729,926	2.02x	16	32
W6 (100% Scan, 1 thread)	94,106	50,880	1.85x	8	16
W6 (100% Scan, 8 threads)	460,125	284,069	1.62x	16	32

Dataset: 16B key / 128B value, 1M keys, relaxed durability, snapshot reads.

Merge-operator workloads — u64 counter: merge (+1) vs get, fixed 8-byte values, 32-byte keys:

Workload	Mace ops/s	RocksDB ops/s	mace/rocksdb ops	Mace p99	RocksDB p99
MERGE_70 (30% get, 70% merge), 1 thread	210,386	253,281	0.83x	4	8
MERGE_70 (30% get, 70% merge), 8 threads	1,085,001	524,390	2.07x	8	16
MERGE_100 (100% merge), 1 thread	192,250	282,164	0.68x	8	4
MERGE_100 (100% merge), 8 threads	842,411	418,602	2.01x	8	16
MERGE_GET_0 (get after 0 merges/key), 1 thread	3,867,072	2,009,637	1.92x	1	1
MERGE_GET_0 (get after 0 merges/key), 8 threads	7,981,551	1,472,972	5.42x	1	16
MERGE_GET_1000 (get after 1k merges/key), 1 thread	1,806,531	29,866	60.49x	2	32
MERGE_GET_1000 (get after 1k merges/key), 8 threads	4,038,680	180,538	22.37x	32	64
MERGE_GET_10000 (get after 10k merges/key), 1 thread	826,647	123,659	6.68x	64	256
MERGE_GET_10000 (get after 10k merges/key), 8 threads	2,595,502	764,122	3.40x	128	128

ops/s = successful operations per second (higher is better); p99 = 99th-percentile latency in µs (lower is better). Bold marks the best value per row.

These tables cover small-value workloads; results for larger values and write-heavy workloads can differ, and the full sweep — all value sizes, thread counts 1/2/4/8, and merge operators — is in the latest full results below.

Latest full results: https://abbycin.github.io/kv_bench/index.html

Methodology and comparison with other engines: kv_bench.

Design Notes

Architecture and crash-safety notes are in docs/design.md.

Status

Storage format and public APIs are essentially stable and ready for production evaluation. Breaking format changes will ship with a migration path rather than silently.

Discussion

Use GitHub Discussions for questions and design talk, or open an issue for bugs and feature requests.

License

This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.

mace-kv 0.1.2