1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284
// LNP P2P library, plmeneting both bolt (BOLT) and Bifrost P2P messaging
// system for Lightning network protocol (LNP)
//
// Written in 2020-2022 by
// Dr. Maxim Orlovsky <orlovsky@pandoracore.com>
//
// To the extent possible under law, the author(s) have dedicated all
// copyright and related and neighboring rights to this software to
// the public domain worldwide. This software is distributed without
// any warranty.
//
// You should have received a copy of the MIT License
// along with this software.
// If not, see <https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>.
//! # Bifrost transaction requirements
//!
//! Bifrost requires all off-chain transactions always have v2 and use
//! v1 witness P2TR outputs (or later witness versions). Transaction inputs,
//! aside from funding transaction, also must be v1 witness inputs spending
//! P2TR outputs (or above).
//!
//! For funding onchain transactions and funding outputs of channel level 1
//! this requirement is released to witness v0 or above. The reason for lower
//! requirement is the interoperability with the bolt lightning network,
//! allowing migration of existing channels opened in bolt network to
//! Bifrost.
//!
//!
//! # Channel coordination
//!
//! For channel operations we assume that any channel may be a multi-peer
//! channel. Thus, for channel updates it is required that all parties
//! cooperate and sign the latest version of updated channel transactions.
//! This is achieved by introducing concept of *channel coordinator*. Channel
//! coordinator is the lightning node that has originally proposed channel.
//! It is responsible for orchestrating message flow between all nodes which
//! are the parts of the channel and keeping them up-to-date. Also, the
//! channel coordinator is the only party required to have direct connections
//! with other channel participants – and each of channel participants is
//! required to be connected at least to the channel coordinator.
//!
//! If a multiple nested channels are present, for all higher-level channels
//! channel coordinator MUST be the same as channel coordinator for the base
//! (level 1) channel; the list of participants for the nested channels MUST be
//! a subset of the participants of the topmost level 1 channel.
//!
//!
//! # Channel workflows
//!
//! There are following workflows affecting channel status / existence. Each
//! of these workflows represent a set of P2P messages exchanged by channel
//! peers.
//!
//! - Channel creation
//! - Moving channel from bolt to Bifrost LN
//! - Removing channel from Bifrost to bolt LN
//! - Changing channel status (pausing etc)
//! - Upgrading channel to support more protocols
//! - Downgrading channel by removing specific protocol
//! - Cooperatively closing channel
//!
//! Workflow can be initiated only by a *channel coordinator*, and specific
//! P2P messages inside the workflow can be sent either from the *channel
//! coordinator* to a peer – or, in response, from a peer to the *channel
//! coordinator*.
//!
//! Normal channel operations are covered by application-specific business logic
//! and messages and are not part of any listed channel workflow. Unlike
//! workflows, they may be initiated by any of the channel peers sending message
//! to the channel coordinator, however whenever they involve other peers or
//! external channels, after being initiated they must be coordinated by the
//! channel coordinator.
//!
//! ## Channel creation workflow
//!
//! Considering generic case of multi-peer channel setup channel creation
//! workflow is organized with the following algorithm:
//!
//! 1. First, all parties agree on the structure of the *funding transaction*
//! and overall transaction graph within the channel – simultaneously signing
//! *refund transaction* (which, upon channel creation, will become first
//! version of the channel *commitment transaction*). This is done using
//! [`ProposeChannel`] requests sent by the *channel coordinator* to each of
//! the peers, replying with either [`AcceptChannel`] (containing updated
//! transaction graph with signed refund transaction) or [`Error`].
//! peers must wait for `CHANNEL_CREATION_TIMEOUT` period and discard all
//! provisional channel data from their memory.
//!
//! 2. Once the refund transaction is fully signed – implying that the
//! transaction graph if agreed between participants – channel coordinator
//! starts next phase, where the funding transaction gets fully signed.
//! Coordinator sends [`FinalizeChannel`] message to each of the peers and
//! collects signatures, publishing the final transaction either to bitcoin
//! blockchain (for level 1 channels) or updating the state of the top-level
//! channel (for nested channels above level 1). Peers track upper level
//! channel or blockchain to detect funding transaction, and upon transaction
//! mining starts operate channel in active mode, not requiring any other
//! messages from the channel coordinator (NB: this differs from the bolt
//! LN channel creation workflow).
//!
//! 3. Replacing funding by fee (RBF): channel coordinator SHOULD initiate RBF
//! subworkflow for level 1 channels if the funding transaction was not mined
//! after reasonable amount of time, which should be less than
//! [`ChannelParams::funding_timeout`]. With RGB subworkflow coordinator
//! updates funding transaction – and propagates it with [`FinalizeChannel`]
//! request, collecting new signatures (peers MUST reset their funding
//! timeout counters).
//!
//! 4. Cancelling channel creation: if any of the peer nodes replied with
//! [`Error`] on any of the channel construction requests within the channel
//! creation workflow – or if the coordinator detected incorrect reply,
//! channel coordinator MUST abandon channel creation – and MUST forward
//! [`Error`] message to all other peers. A peer posting [`Error`] MUST
//! provide a valid error code and a message explaining the cause of the
//! error. The coordinator SHOULD also send [`Error`] message to peers if
//! any of the stages of transaction construction workflow has stuck
//! without a reply from a peer for over [`ChannelParams::peer_timeout`]
//! time.
//!
//! 5. Timeouts: the coordinator SHOULD send [`Error`] message to peers if any
//! of the peers at any stage of transaction construction workflow has stuck
//! without a reply for over [`ChannelParams::peer_timeout`] time.
//! The peers should abandon channel and clear all information about it from
//! the memory regardless whether they have received [`Error`] message from
//! the coordinator after [`ChannelParams::peer_timeout`]` * 2` time before
//! `ChannelFinalized` – and if they has not received new
//! [`FinalizeChannel`] request from the coordinator after
//! [`ChannelParams::funding_timeout`] time (see pt 3 for RBF subworkflow).
//!
//! ```ignore
//! Channel coordinator Peer 1 Peer 2
//! | | |
//! (enters ChannelProposed state) | |
//! | | |
//! | --(1)- ProposeChannel ------> | |
//! | | |
//! | --(1)------------ ProposeChannel --------------> |
//! | | |
//! | (enter ChannelProposed state)
//! | | |
//! | <-(2)------------- AcceptChannel --------------- |
//! | | |
//! | <-(2)-- AcceptChannel ------- | |
//! | | |
//! (enters ChannelAccepted state) (enter ChannelAccepted state)
//! | | |
//! | --(3)- FinalizeChannel -----> | |
//! | | |
//! | --(3)------------ FinalizeChannel -------------> |
//! | | |
//! | <-(4)-- FinalizeChannel ----- | |
//! | | |
//! | <-(4)------------- FinalizeChannel ------------- |
//! | | |
//! (enters ChannelFinalized state) (enter ChannelFinalized state)
//! | | |
//! (await funding transaction mining or entering the valid super-channel state)
//! | | |
//! (enters ChannelActive state) (enter ChannelActive state)
//! | | |
//! ```
//!
//! During channel construction workflow channels are identified by
//! [`ChannelId`], which is constructed as a tagged SHA-256 hash
//! (using `bifrost:channel-proposal` as tag) of the strict-serialized
//! [`ChannelParams`] data and coordinator node public key.
//!
//! [`Error`]: [struct@Error]
mod app;
mod channel;
mod ctrl;
mod msg;
mod proposals;
mod types;
use std::io;
use std::ops::Deref;
pub use app::{BifrostApp, BIFROST_APP_STORM, BIFROST_APP_VENDOR_MASK};
pub use channel::*;
pub use ctrl::*;
use internet2::{CreateUnmarshaller, Payload, Unmarshall, Unmarshaller};
use lnpbp::bech32::Blob;
pub use msg::Msg;
use once_cell::sync::Lazy;
pub use proposals::*;
use strict_encoding::{self, StrictDecode, StrictEncode};
pub use types::{
AddressList, AnnouncedNodeAddr, ChannelId, ProtocolList, ProtocolName,
ProtocolNameError,
};
/// Default bolt Lightning port number
pub const LNP2P_BIFROST_PORT: u16 = 9999;
pub static LNP2P_BIFROST_UNMARSHALLER: Lazy<Unmarshaller<Messages>> =
Lazy::new(Messages::create_unmarshaller);
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Display, Api)]
#[api(encoding = "strict")]
#[non_exhaustive]
#[display(inner)]
pub enum Messages {
// Part I: Generic messages outside of channel operations (BOLT-1)
// ===============================================================
/// Once authentication is complete, the first message reveals the features
/// supported or required by this node, even if this is a reconnection.
#[api(type = 0x0010)]
Init(Init),
/// For simplicity of diagnosis, it's often useful to tell a peer that
/// something is incorrect.
#[api(type = 0x0011)]
Error(Error),
/// In order to allow for the existence of long-lived TCP connections, at
/// times it may be required that both ends keep alive the TCP connection
/// at the application level. Such messages also allow obfuscation of
/// traffic patterns.
#[api(type = 0x0012)]
Ping(Ping),
/// The pong message is to be sent whenever a ping message is received. It
/// serves as a reply and also serves to keep the connection alive, while
/// explicitly notifying the other end that the receiver is still active.
/// Within the received ping message, the sender will specify the number of
/// bytes to be included within the data payload of the pong message.
#[api(type = 0x0013)]
#[display("pong(...)")]
Pong(Blob),
#[api(type = 0x0014)]
#[display(inner)]
Message(Msg),
#[api(type = 0x0020)]
ProposeChannel(ProposeChannel),
#[api(type = 0x0021)]
AcceptChannel(AcceptChannel),
#[api(type = 0x0022)]
FinalizeChannel(FinalizeChannel),
#[api(type = 0x0023)]
MoveChannel(MoveChannel),
#[api(type = 0x0024)]
RemoveChannel(RemoveChannel),
#[api(type = 0x0025)]
UpdateChannelStatus(UpdateChannelStatus),
#[api(type = 0x0026)]
UpgradeChannel(UpgradeChannel),
#[api(type = 0x0027)]
DowngradeChannel(DowngradeChannel),
#[api(type = 0x0028)]
CloseChannel(CloseChannel),
}
impl StrictEncode for Messages {
fn strict_encode<E: io::Write>(
&self,
e: E,
) -> Result<usize, strict_encoding::Error> {
Payload::from(self.clone()).strict_encode(e)
}
}
impl StrictDecode for Messages {
fn strict_decode<D: io::Read>(
d: D,
) -> Result<Self, strict_encoding::Error> {
let message =
LNP2P_BIFROST_UNMARSHALLER.unmarshall(d).map_err(|err| {
strict_encoding::Error::DataIntegrityError(format!(
"can't unmarshall Bifrost LNP2P message. Details: {}",
err
))
})?;
Ok(message.deref().clone())
}
}