Lemon
Reactive native UI for Rust, with an architecture you can still hold in your head.
Lemon is a reactive UI toolkit for native desktop applications in Rust.
It combines a small reactive runtime, a fluent builder API, incremental tree diffing, retained layout state, and a modern GPU rendering stack. The goal is simple: make native UI in Rust feel composable, explicit, and fast without burying the rendering model under a giant framework.
Lemon is already useful as a serious experimental codebase and an early foundation for desktop UI work. It is not yet a fully mature application framework, but it is far enough along to demonstrate a credible direction for building Rust-native UI.
Core stack: winit · wgpu · Vello · Taffy · Parley
Why Lemon
- Reactive state with explicit
Signal,Effect, andCxprimitives - Fluent UI builders for composing trees in plain Rust
- Incremental updates through diff + retained tree, rather than full rebuilds of every downstream stage
- Modern native rendering pipeline built on
wgpuandvello - Architecture that stays understandable: runtime, element tree, diff, retained tree, layout, paint, platform
Positioning
Lemon sits between a toy UI experiment and a production-complete framework.
It is best understood today as:
- a credible foundation for exploring native Rust UI architecture
- a serious experimental toolkit for early adopters
- a codebase designed to stay legible as it grows
It is not trying to imitate a web framework in Rust, and it is not trying to claim feature parity with large established UI toolkits. Its value is the combination of explicit reactivity, incremental updates, and a rendering pipeline that contributors can actually understand.
Quick Example
use *;
Run the counter example:
Examples
The workspace includes a few small but representative examples:
counter: quick startsignals/memo/effects: reactive hookskeys: keyed list diffingcomponents: nestedComponent::newlayout: flex containers and stylingform: TextInput, Scroll, and widget integrationcustom_select: rebuilding a select-like control from primitives for full visual controlshowcase: theme, animation, opacity, and platform polish together
Run them with:
Mental Model
Lemon is intentionally built as a pipeline of small layers:
- Runtime: signals, derived values, effects, and hook-like APIs through
Cx - Element tree: builders such as
Column,Row,View,Text, andButton(Box_was renamed toView; seecargo doc -p lemon) - Diff: compare virtual trees and emit patches
- Retained tree: store live nodes, handlers, and Taffy layout IDs
- Layout: compute flex layout and text measurement
- Paint: build a Vello scene
- Platform: dispatch input, manage the window, and present frames
This layering matters. Lemon is designed so that state changes do not imply full re-execution of every lower-level concern beyond what is actually dirty.
Repository Layout
Single lemon crate at the repo root:
| Path | Role |
|---|---|
src/ |
Core runtime, element model, diff, retained tree, layout, paint, platform |
src/widget/ |
App-facing widgets (TextInput, Scroll, Select, Slider, Image, …) |
examples/*.rs |
Runnable examples (cargo run --example <name>) |
| Example | Topic |
|---|---|
counter |
Quick start |
signals / memo / effects |
Reactive hooks |
keys |
Keyed list diffing |
components |
Component::new |
layout |
Flex layout and styling |
form |
TextInput, Scroll |
rich |
Image, Select, Slider, Scroll showcase |
custom_select |
Primitive-first customization and dynamic paint |
showcase |
Theme, animation, opacity, and platform polish |
Current Capabilities
Today, the codebase includes:
- reactive rendering through signals and effects
- builder-based composition for boxes, rows, columns, text, buttons, and components
- incremental patch generation and retained tree updates
- flex layout via Taffy
- text measurement and painting via Parley + Vello
- mouse click handling
- keyboard event dispatch and focus cycling
- hover enter/leave handling and cursor selection
- example applications that exercise composition, keyed updates, and interaction
Primitive-First Customization
Built-in widgets such as Button, Select, Slider, Scroll, and TextInput cover common
application UI, and their defaults come from the active Theme. Start there when the widget shape
matches your product. Use run_with_theme for app-wide tokens and widget style types such as
SelectStyle, SliderStyle, and TextInputStyle for local overrides.
When a widget almost fits but the visual structure does not, rebuild the control from primitives:
View, Column, Row, Text, Button, Signal, and event handlers. This keeps the app in the
normal Lemon pipeline while giving you control over layout, paint, hover/press state, and copy.
For repeated dynamic rows, give siblings stable .key(id) values so diffing preserves identity.
For colors that depend on live state, pass a closure to paint builders such as .background(...);
the closure is stored as a dynamic ColorSource and is resolved as the tree is frozen.
The custom_select example demonstrates this escape hatch by building a select-like control from
regular nodes:
Use this path when the customization is mostly visual or structural. Prefer the built-in widget plus theme/style overrides when the interaction model is the same. Fork or write a custom widget when you need to own identity, overlay positioning, pointer capture, keyboard handling, or internal state transitions as a reusable app abstraction.
Current limits live at the paint layer. Widget-managed details such as scrollbars and text-input carets are painted by Lemon's retained widget metadata, not by arbitrary app paint hooks. If those details need brand-specific behavior beyond existing style overrides, use a custom primitive composition where possible and track the relevant roadmap work: #40 for theme tokens, #42 for theme-backed widget defaults, #92 for positioned select overlays, and #93 for scroll behavior polish.
Current Status
Lemon should be understood as an early-stage library with a real architecture, not a finished framework.
That means:
- the internal model is strong enough to build on
- the workspace has meaningful tests and CI gates
- the public surface is still evolving
- some application-level widgets and interaction patterns are still missing
If you are evaluating Lemon, the right expectation is: serious experimental library, not production-stable UI platform.
Stability
What is stable enough to rely on conceptually:
- the layered architecture
- the reactive rendering model
- the use of retained state and incremental updates as core design principles
What is still evolving:
- app-facing ergonomics
- widget breadth
- public API shape
- interaction and platform coverage
What Is Not There Yet
Lemon is still missing parts that a production UI framework would need, including areas such as:
- richer text input controls
- broader widget set
- scrolling and overflow behavior
- image and asset workflows beyond the current core
- accessibility and deeper platform integration
- long-term API stability guarantees
Roadmap Direction
Near-term work is likely to continue in the following areas:
- richer built-in widgets
- stronger text and input handling
- scrolling and overflow semantics
- broader interaction coverage
- clearer application-facing APIs on top of the core engine
- continued hardening of tests, examples, and internal boundaries
Developing In This Repository
Prerequisites:
- recent stable Rust
- a machine capable of running the
wgpu/vellostack
Useful commands:
Full quality gates:
# or:
Contributing
Contributions should preserve the current architecture rather than blur it.
In practice, good changes in this repository usually:
- keep logic in the correct layer
- stay small and explicit
- add or update tests near the affected module
- verify examples when public APIs change
- pass
fmt,clippy, and workspace tests
For repository-specific contributor guidance, see AGENTS.md.
Design Direction
Lemon is aiming for a style of Rust UI development that is:
- reactive, but explicit
- ergonomic, but not magical
- layered, so the rendering model stays inspectable
- small enough that contributors can understand the whole stack
The project is especially opinionated about keeping the pipeline legible. If the framework grows, it should grow by strengthening these layers rather than hiding them.
License
MIT