use lemma::{format_source, parse, ResourceLimits};
fn format_and_extract_rule_expr(source: &str) -> String {
let formatted = format_source(source, "test.lemma").unwrap();
let lines: Vec<&str> = formatted.lines().collect();
for (i, line) in lines.iter().enumerate() {
let trimmed = line.trim();
if let Some(rest) = trimmed.strip_prefix("rule x: ") {
return rest.to_string();
}
if trimmed == "rule x:" {
let next = lines.get(i + 1).map(|s| s.trim()).unwrap_or("");
if !next.is_empty() {
return next.to_string();
}
}
}
panic!(
"Could not find 'rule x: ...' in formatted output: {}",
formatted
);
}
#[test]
fn precedence_add_inside_multiply_preserves_parens() {
let src = "spec test data a: 1 data b: 2 data c: 3 rule x: (a + b) * c";
assert_eq!(format_and_extract_rule_expr(src), "(a + b) * c");
}
#[test]
fn precedence_multiply_inside_add_omits_parens() {
let src = "spec test data a: 1 data b: 2 data c: 3 rule x: a + b * c";
assert_eq!(format_and_extract_rule_expr(src), "a + b * c");
}
#[test]
fn precedence_add_right_of_multiply_preserves_parens() {
let src = "spec test data a: 1 data b: 2 data c: 3 rule x: a * (b + c)";
assert_eq!(format_and_extract_rule_expr(src), "a * (b + c)");
}
#[test]
fn precedence_same_level_add_no_extra_parens() {
let src = "spec test data a: 1 data b: 2 data c: 3 rule x: (a + b) + c";
assert_eq!(format_and_extract_rule_expr(src), "a + b + c");
}
#[test]
fn precedence_same_level_multiply_no_extra_parens() {
let src = "spec test data a: 1 data b: 2 data c: 3 rule x: (a * b) * c";
assert_eq!(format_and_extract_rule_expr(src), "a * b * c");
}
#[test]
fn precedence_not_binds_tighter_than_and() {
let src = "spec test data a: true data b: true rule x: not a and b";
assert_eq!(format_and_extract_rule_expr(src), "not a and b");
}
#[test]
fn precedence_not_over_and_preserves_parens() {
let src = "spec test data a: true data b: true rule x: not (a and b)";
assert_eq!(format_and_extract_rule_expr(src), "not (a and b)");
}
#[test]
fn precedence_subtract_inside_multiply_preserves_parens() {
let src = "spec test data a: 1 data b: 2 data c: 3 rule x: (a - b) * c";
assert_eq!(format_and_extract_rule_expr(src), "(a - b) * c");
}
#[test]
fn precedence_multiply_inside_subtract_omits_parens() {
let src = "spec test data a: 1 data b: 2 data c: 3 rule x: a - b * c";
assert_eq!(format_and_extract_rule_expr(src), "a - b * c");
}
#[test]
fn precedence_nested_arithmetic_mixed() {
let src = "spec test data a: 1 data b: 2 data c: 3 data d: 4 rule x: (a + b) * (c - d)";
assert_eq!(format_and_extract_rule_expr(src), "(a + b) * (c - d)");
}
#[test]
fn precedence_comparison_lower_than_arithmetic() {
let src = "spec test data a: 1 data b: 2 data c: 3 rule x: a + b > c";
assert_eq!(format_and_extract_rule_expr(src), "a + b > c");
}
#[test]
fn precedence_deeply_nested() {
let src = "spec test data a: 1 data b: 2 data c: 3 data d: 4 rule x: a + b * c + d";
assert_eq!(format_and_extract_rule_expr(src), "a + b * c + d");
}
const EXAMPLE_FILES: &[(&str, &str)] = &[
(
"01_coffee_order.lemma",
include_str!("../../documentation/examples/01_coffee_order.lemma"),
),
(
"02_library_fees.lemma",
include_str!("../../documentation/examples/02_library_fees.lemma"),
),
(
"03_recipe_scaling.lemma",
include_str!("../../documentation/examples/03_recipe_scaling.lemma"),
),
(
"04_membership_benefits.lemma",
include_str!("../../documentation/examples/04_membership_benefits.lemma"),
),
(
"05_weather_clothing.lemma",
include_str!("../../documentation/examples/05_weather_clothing.lemma"),
),
];
fn round_trip_example(filename: &str, source: &str) {
let formatted = format_source(source, filename)
.unwrap_or_else(|e| panic!("[{}] format_source failed: {:?}", filename, e));
let limits = ResourceLimits::default();
let original_specs = parse(source, filename, &limits)
.unwrap_or_else(|e| panic!("[{}] initial parse failed: {:?}", filename, e))
.specs;
let reformatted_specs = parse(&formatted, filename, &limits)
.unwrap_or_else(|e| {
panic!(
"[{}] re-parse of formatted output failed: {:?} Formatted output: {}",
filename, e, formatted
)
})
.specs;
assert_eq!(
original_specs.len(),
reformatted_specs.len(),
"[{}] spec count mismatch after round-trip",
filename
);
for (orig, refmt) in original_specs.iter().zip(reformatted_specs.iter()) {
assert_eq!(orig.name, refmt.name, "[{}] spec name mismatch", filename);
assert_eq!(
orig.commentary, refmt.commentary,
"[{}] spec '{}' commentary mismatch",
filename, orig.name
);
assert_eq!(
orig.data.len(),
refmt.data.len(),
"[{}] spec '{}' data count mismatch",
filename,
orig.name
);
let orig_data_refs: Vec<_> = orig.data.iter().map(|f| &f.reference).collect();
let refmt_data_refs: Vec<_> = refmt.data.iter().map(|f| &f.reference).collect();
assert_eq!(
orig_data_refs, refmt_data_refs,
"[{}] spec '{}' data references mismatch",
filename, orig.name
);
assert_eq!(
orig.rules.len(),
refmt.rules.len(),
"[{}] spec '{}' rule count mismatch",
filename,
orig.name
);
for (orig_rule, refmt_rule) in orig.rules.iter().zip(refmt.rules.iter()) {
assert_eq!(
orig_rule.name, refmt_rule.name,
"[{}] spec '{}' rule name mismatch",
filename, orig.name
);
assert_eq!(
orig_rule.expression, refmt_rule.expression,
"[{}] spec '{}' rule '{}' expression mismatch",
filename, orig.name, orig_rule.name
);
assert_eq!(
orig_rule.unless_clauses.len(),
refmt_rule.unless_clauses.len(),
"[{}] spec '{}' rule '{}' unless-clause count mismatch",
filename,
orig.name,
orig_rule.name
);
for (i, (orig_uc, refmt_uc)) in orig_rule
.unless_clauses
.iter()
.zip(refmt_rule.unless_clauses.iter())
.enumerate()
{
assert_eq!(
orig_uc.condition, refmt_uc.condition,
"[{}] spec '{}' rule '{}' unless[{}] condition mismatch",
filename, orig.name, orig_rule.name, i
);
assert_eq!(
orig_uc.result, refmt_uc.result,
"[{}] spec '{}' rule '{}' unless[{}] result mismatch",
filename, orig.name, orig_rule.name, i
);
}
}
}
}
#[test]
fn round_trip_01_coffee_order() {
round_trip_example(EXAMPLE_FILES[0].0, EXAMPLE_FILES[0].1);
}
#[test]
fn round_trip_02_library_fees() {
round_trip_example(EXAMPLE_FILES[1].0, EXAMPLE_FILES[1].1);
}
#[test]
fn round_trip_03_recipe_scaling() {
round_trip_example(EXAMPLE_FILES[2].0, EXAMPLE_FILES[2].1);
}
#[test]
fn round_trip_04_membership_benefits() {
round_trip_example(EXAMPLE_FILES[3].0, EXAMPLE_FILES[3].1);
}
#[test]
fn round_trip_05_weather_clothing() {
round_trip_example(EXAMPLE_FILES[4].0, EXAMPLE_FILES[4].1);
}
#[test]
fn idempotency_precedence_expressions() {
let expressions = [
"(a + b) * c",
"a + b * c",
"a * (b + c)",
"(a + b) + c",
"not a and b",
"not (a and b)",
"(a + b) * (c - d)",
];
for expr in expressions {
let src = format!(
"spec test data a: 1 data b: 2 data c: 3 data d: 4 rule x: {}",
expr
);
let output1 = format_source(&src, "test.lemma")
.unwrap_or_else(|e| panic!("first format failed for '{}': {:?}", expr, e));
let output2 = format_source(&output1, "test.lemma").unwrap_or_else(|e| {
panic!(
"second format failed for '{}': {:?} First output: {}",
expr, e, output1
)
});
assert_eq!(
output1, output2,
"formatter is not idempotent for expression '{}'. First: {} Second: {}",
expr, output1, output2
);
}
}
#[test]
fn round_trip_type_import_with_effective() {
let source = "spec consumer data money from finance 2026-01-15 data p: money";
let formatted = format_source(source, "test.lemma").unwrap();
assert!(
formatted.contains("data money from finance 2026-01-15"),
"expected effective datetime in formatted output: {}",
formatted
);
let reformatted = format_source(&formatted, "test.lemma").unwrap();
assert_eq!(
formatted, reformatted,
"type import with effective is not idempotent"
);
}
#[test]
fn round_trip_type_import_registry_with_effective() {
let source = "spec consumer data money from @lemma/std/finance 2026-01-15 data p: money";
let formatted = format_source(source, "test.lemma").unwrap();
assert!(
formatted.contains("data money from @lemma/std/finance 2026-01-15"),
"expected registry+effective in formatted output: {}",
formatted
);
let reformatted = format_source(&formatted, "test.lemma").unwrap();
assert_eq!(
formatted, reformatted,
"registry type import with effective is not idempotent"
);
}