lb_clmm 0.1.1

Created with Anchor
Documentation 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46

use crate::authorize_modify_position;
use crate::state::{bin::BinArray, lb_pair::LbPair, position::PositionV2};
use anchor_lang::prelude::*;
use anchor_spl::token_interface::{Mint, TokenAccount, TokenInterface};

#[event_cpi]
#[derive(Accounts)]
#[instruction(reward_index: u64)]
pub struct ClaimReward<'info> {
    #[account(mut)]
    pub lb_pair: AccountLoader<'info, LbPair>,

    #[account(
        mut,
        has_one = lb_pair,
        constraint = authorize_modify_position(&position, sender.key())?
    )]
    pub position: AccountLoader<'info, PositionV2>,

    #[account(
        mut,
        has_one = lb_pair
    )]
    pub bin_array_lower: AccountLoader<'info, BinArray>,
    #[account(
        mut,
        has_one = lb_pair
    )]
    pub bin_array_upper: AccountLoader<'info, BinArray>,

    pub sender: Signer<'info>,

    #[account(mut)]
    pub reward_vault: Box<InterfaceAccount<'info, TokenAccount>>,
    pub reward_mint: Box<InterfaceAccount<'info, Mint>>,

    #[account(mut)]
    pub user_token_account: Box<InterfaceAccount<'info, TokenAccount>>,

    pub token_program: Interface<'info, TokenInterface>,
}

// TODO: Should we pass in range of bin we are going to collect reward ? It could help us in heap / compute unit issue by chunking into multiple tx.
pub fn handle(ctx: Context<ClaimReward>, index: u64) -> Result<()> {
    Ok(())
}