# keyseq

[](https://github.com/shanecelis/keyseq/actions)
[](https://crates.io/crates/keyseq)
[](https://docs.rs/keyseq)
Specify key chords using `ctrl-A` short-hand, supports [bevy](https://bevyengine.org) and
[winit](https://github.com/rust-windowing/winit).
# Objective
* Specify key chords in code the same way as they are specified in
documentation.
* For the sake of finding key chords in code, prefer one way of describing the
keys, e.g., accept "ctrl-A"; do not accept "control-A" or "C-A" or "Ctrl+A".
# Install
``` sh
cargo add keyseq --features bevy; # OR --features winit
```
# Principal Macros
* The `pkey!` macro specifies a physical key chord, e.g., `pkey! { ctrl-A }`.
* The `pkeyseq!` macro specifies a physical key chord sequence, e.g., `pkeyseq! { ctrl-A alt-B C }`.
* The `lkey!` macro specifies a logical key chord, .e.g, `lkey! { ctrl-a }`.
* The `lkeyseq!` macro specifies a logical key chord sequence, e.g. `lkeyseq! { ctrl-a alt-b c }`.
# Concepts
* A physical key denotes a particular key on the keyboard. It emits a key code
that does not change no matter what modifiers are held down. For instance
there is a physical 'Q' key, often to the right of the tab key. There is no
physical lower-case 'q' key.
* A logical key is specified by the key produces. If pressing the key produces
a 'q' character, then it is logically a 'q' key.
# Usage
## Winit
With the "winit" feature the `keyseq::winit::pkey!` macro returns a
`(Modifiers, KeyCode)` tuple.
### Physical Keys
```
use keyseq::{Modifiers, winit::pkey};
use winit::keyboard::KeyCode;
assert_eq!(pkey! { A }, (Modifiers::NONE, KeyCode::KeyA));
assert_eq!(pkey! { ctrl-A }, (Modifiers::CONTROL, KeyCode::KeyA));
assert_eq!(pkey! { alt-A }, (Modifiers::ALT, KeyCode::KeyA));
assert_eq!(pkey! { shift-A }, (Modifiers::SHIFT, KeyCode::KeyA));
assert_eq!(pkey! { super-A }, (Modifiers::SUPER, KeyCode::KeyA));
assert_eq!(pkey! { ctrl-alt-; }, (Modifiers::ALT |
Modifiers::CONTROL, KeyCode::Semicolon));
```
### Physical Key Sequences
```
# use keyseq::Modifiers;
# use winit::keyboard::KeyCode;
use keyseq::winit::pkeyseq;
assert_eq!(pkeyseq! { A ctrl-B }, [(Modifiers::NONE, KeyCode::KeyA),
(Modifiers::CONTROL, KeyCode::KeyB)]);
```
### Logical Keys
With the "winit" feature the `keyseq::winit::lkey!` macro returns a
`(Modifiers, Key)` tuple.
```
use keyseq::{Modifiers, winit::lkey};
use winit::keyboard::Key;
assert_eq!(lkey! { a }, (Modifiers::NONE, Key::Character('a')));
assert_eq!(lkey! { ctrl-a }, (Modifiers::CONTROL, Key::Character('a')));
assert_eq!(lkey! { alt-a }, (Modifiers::ALT, Key::Character('a')));
assert_eq!(lkey! { shift-a }, (Modifiers::SHIFT, Key::Character('a')));
assert_eq!(lkey! { super-a }, (Modifiers::SUPER, Key::Character('a')));
assert_eq!(lkey! { ctrl-alt-; }, (Modifiers::ALT |
Modifiers::CONTROL, Key::Character(';')));
```
### Logical Key Sequences
```
# use keyseq::Modifiers;
# use winit::keyboard::Key;
use keyseq::winit::lkeyseq;
assert_eq!(lkeyseq! { a ctrl-b }, [(Modifiers::NONE, Key::Character('a')),
(Modifiers::CONTROL, Key::Character('b'))]);
```
### No lower case physical keys
The following code will fail to compile. It insists on a capital 'A' for
specifying the A key.
```compile_fail
# use keyseq::winit::pkey;
let (mods, key) = pkey! { a }; // error: Use uppercase key names for physical keys
```
### Strict modifier order
With the "strict-order" feature enabled by default, modifiers out of order will
produce compiler errors. Without the feature, it will emit warnings.
```compile_fail
# use keyseq::winit::pkey;
let _ = pkey! { alt-ctrl-A }; // error: Modifiers must occur in this order: control, alt, shift, super.
```
### Why not use `winit::keyboard::ModifiersState`?
Why return `keyseq::Modifiers` and not `winit`'s own `ModifiersState`? Both
`keyseq::Modifiers` and `winit::keyboard::ModifiersState` are generated using
the [bitflags](https://docs.rs/bitflags/latest/bitflags/) crate. Originally this
crate did return `winit`'s native modifiers struct because it desugared to nearly
the same thing:
```ignore
// keyseq::winit::pkey! { ctrl-alt-A } desugared to
( ModifiersState::CONTROL
| ModifiersState::ALT
| ModifiersState::empty(), winit::keyboard::KeyCode::KeyA)
// keyseq::bevy::pkey! { ctrl-alt-A } desugars to
( Modifiers::CONTROL
| Modifiers::ALT
| Modifiers::empty(), bevy::prelude::KeyCode::KeyA)
```
However, this these bitflags put together with bit-or pipes had a problem with
match expressions.
```ignore
let modifiers: ModifiersState = ...;
match (modifiers.into(), key_code) {
// pkey! { ctrl-alt-A } => println!("Just pressed ctrl-alt-A!"),
// desugared to
(ModifiersState::CONTROL |
ModifiersState::ALT |
ModifiersState::empty(),
KeyCode::KeyA) => println!("Just pressed ctrl-alt-A!"),
```
When desugared the bit-or `|` is now interpretered as a match-or `|`, which does
not match `ctrl-alt`; it only matches `ctrl` or `alt` or no modifiers. (This
actually seems like a pretty big expressive deficiency for `bitflags` generated
structs.)
To avoid this problem `keyseq::Modifiers` is defined as `Modifiers(pub u8)` and
the bitflags are computed in the macro. That allows the following match
expressions to work as expected.
```ignore
match (modifiers.into(), key_code) {
// pkey! { ctrl-alt-A } => println!("Just pressed ctrl-alt-A!"),
// now desugars to
(Modifiers(3), KeyCode::KeyA) => println!("Just pressed ctrl-alt-A!"),
// And we can use the match-or to match multiple keychords.
pkey! { ctrl-A } | pkey! { super-A } => println!("Just pressed ctrl-A or super-A!"),
```
In addition `keyseq::Modifiers` implements `From<ModifiersState>` and vice
versa.
## Bevy
With the "bevy" feature the `keyseq::bevy::pkey!` macro returns a
`(keyseq::Modifiers, KeyCode)` tuple.
Bevy doesn't have a logical key representation so there are no `lkey!` and
`lkeyseq!` macros.
```
use bevy::prelude::KeyCode;
use keyseq::{Modifiers, bevy::pkey};
assert_eq!(pkey! { ctrl-A }, (Modifiers::CONTROL, KeyCode::KeyA));
assert_eq!(pkey! { alt-A }, (Modifiers::ALT, KeyCode::KeyA));
assert_eq!(pkey! { shift-A }, (Modifiers::SHIFT, KeyCode::KeyA));
assert_eq!(pkey! { super-A }, (Modifiers::SUPER, KeyCode::KeyA));
assert_eq!(pkey! { ctrl-shift-A },
(Modifiers::SHIFT |
Modifiers::CONTROL, KeyCode::KeyA));
```
# Features
* winit, include support for winit
* bevy, include support for bevy
* poor, an anemic representation for internal testing
* strict-order, use a strict order for modifiers: ctrl, alt, shift, super
(enabled by default)
# Examples
For both examples press `A` with modifiers and it will print a message showing
what keychord matched.
## Winit Example
``` sh
cargo run --example winit --features winit
```
## Bevy Example
``` sh
cargo run --example bevy --features bevy
```
# Notes
## Macro Notation
Although using parens will work `pkey!(ctrl-alt-A)`, rustfmt will add spaces
around the hyphen changing it to `pkey!(ctrl - alt - A)`. Therefore, it's
suggested to use curly braces `pkey! { ctrl-alt-A }` which are not reformatted
like that.
## Compatibility
| 0.1.0 | 0.12.* | 0.29.* |
| 0.2.0 | 0.13.* | 0.29.* |
# License
This crate is licensed under the MIT License or the Apache License 2.0.