# [Solvers](@id solvers)
## Introduction
HiGHS has implementations of the three main solution techniques for LP
(simplex, interior point and primal-dual hybrid gradient), two
solution techniques for QP (active set and interior point), and one
MIP solver. By default HiGHS will choose the most appropriate
technique for a given problem, but this can be over-ridden by setting
the option [__solver__](@ref option-solver).
What follows below is an overview of all the solvers and key
[options](@ref option-definitions) that define their algorithmic
features. The relevant [__solver__](@ref option-solver) settings for
each problem type, and their interpretation when incompatible with the
problem type, are then [summarised](@ref solver-option).
## LP
#### [Simplex](@id solvers-simplex)
HiGHS has efficient implementations of both the primal and dual
simplex methods, although the dual simplex solver is likely to be
faster and is more robust, so is used by default. Similarly, for
reasons discussed in the [parallelism](@ref) section, the parallel
dual simplex solver is unlikely to be worth using. The novel features
of the dual simplex solver are described in
_Parallelizing the dual revised simplex method_, Q. Huangfu and
J. A. J. Hall, Mathematical Programming Computation, 10 (1), 119-142,
2018 [DOI:
10.1007/s12532-017-0130-5](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12532-017-0130-5).
* Setting the option [__solver__](@ref option-solver) to "simplex" forces the simplex solver to be used
* The option [__simplex\_strategy__](@ref option-simplex-strategy)
determines whether the primal solver or one of the parallel solvers is
to be used.
#### [Interior point](@id solvers-lp-ipm)
HiGHS has two interior point (IPM) solvers:
* IPX is based on the preconditioned conjugate gradient method, as discussed in
_Implementation of an interior point method with basis
preconditioning_, Mathematical Programming Computation, 12, 603-635,
2020. [DOI:
10.1007/s12532-020-00181-8](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12532-020-00181-8).
This solver is serial.
* HiPO is based on a direct factorisation, as discussed in
_A factorisation-based regularised interior point method using the
augmented system_, F. Zanetti and J. Gondzio, 2025, [available on
arxiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04370)
This solver is parallel.
The [__hipo\_system__](@ref option-hipo-system) option can be used to
select the approach to use when solving the Newton systems within
the interior point solver: select "augmented" to force the solver to
use the augmented system, "normaleq" for normal equations, or
"choose" to leave the choice to the solver.
The option [__hipo\_ordering__](@ref option-hipo-ordering) can be used
to select the fill-reducing heuristic to use during the
factorisation:
* Nested dissection, obtained setting the option
[__hipo\_ordering__](@ref option-hipo-ordering) to "metis".
* Approximate minimum degree, obtained setting the option
[__hipo\_ordering__](@ref option-hipo-ordering) to "amd".
* Reverse Cuthill-McKee, obtained setting the option
[__hipo\_ordering__](@ref option-hipo-ordering) to "rcm".
For small LPs, IPX is often faster than HiPO. However, as problem size
grows, HiPO becomes more efficient, and its advantage can be more
than an order of magnitude.
#### Primal-dual hybrid gradient method (PDLP)
HiGHS includes the [
cuPDLP-C](https://github.com/COPT-Public/cuPDLP-C) primal-dual hybrid
gradient method for LP (PDLP), and also has a native PDLP solver,
HiPDLP. On Linux and Windows, these solvers can be run on an NVIDIA
[GPU](@ref gpu). On a CPU, they are unlikely to be competitive with
the HiGHS interior point or simplex solvers.
* Setting the option [__solver__](@ref option-solver) to "pdlp" forces the cuPDLP-C solver to be used
* Setting the option [__solver__](@ref option-solver) to "hipdlp" forces the HiPDLP solver to be used
### Basic solution
The simplex solver always generates a [basic solution](@ref
term-basic-solution). This is a solution at a vertex of the feasible
region of the LP.
By default, the IPM solvers also generate a basic solution by running
a procedure known as "crossover". This can occasionally be very
expensive so if users require only a solution to the LP, and not a
basic solution, crossover can be suppressed. This is done by setting
the [run\_crossover](@ref option-run-crossover) option to
"off". However, if the IPM solver terminates without satsifying the
[feasibility and optimality](@ref kkt) conditions, HiGHS will not
claim optimality. Hence it is better to set the __run\_crossover__
option to "choose", in which case crossover will be run if the IPM
solver terminates without determining optimality.
The PDLP solver does not generate a basic solution. Currently it has
no crossover procedure to obtain one.
When modifications have been made to an LP problem, the simplex solver
(only) can solve the modified problem from the optimal basis of the
original LP, a process known as ["hot starting"](@ref hot-start-lp).
## QP
HiGHS has two solvers for convex QP: a primal active set method, and
an interior point method. The active set implementation uses a dense
Cholesky factorization of the reduced Hessian, and the the limit on
its dimension is determined by the option
[__qp\_nullspace\_limit__](@ref option-qp-nullspace-limit). The
interior point solver is HiPO, so see [above](@ref solvers-lp-ipm) for
the key algorithmic options.
## MIP
MIPs are solved using a sophisticated branch-and-cut solver. This is
largely single-threaded, although a prototype multithreaded solver was
completed in February 2026, and is expected to be released by
June. Users can choose the solver for LP sub-problems as follows
* LPs where an advanced basis is not known. This is generally the case
at the root node of the branch-and-bound tree, but can occur at
other times in the MIP solution process. By default the simplex
solver is used, but the [__mip\_lp\_solver__](@ref
option-mip-lp-solver) option allows the user to determine whether
one of the IPM solvers is used.
* LPs where an interior point solver must be used. This is generally
when computing the analytic centre of the constraints for the
centralised rounding heuristic. By default IPX is used, but the
[__mip\_ipm\_solver__](@ref option-mip-ipm-solver) option allows the
user to determine whether HiPO is used.
Otherwise, for LPs where an advanced basis is known, only the simplex
solver can be used.
## [Summary](@id solver-option)
The option [__solver__](@ref option-solver) can be set to:
* "simplex", which selects the simplex solver.
* "ipm", which selects the HiPO solver (or IPX if HiPO is not available in the build).
* "ipx", which selects the IPX solver.
* "hipo", which selects the HiPO solver, for both LP and QP.
* "pdlp", which selects the cuPDLP-C solver.
* "hipdlp", which selects the HiPDLP solver.
* "qpasm", which selects the QP active-set method.
* "choose", which selects the default solver for the given problem ("simplex" for LP, "qpasm" for QP).
The option [__solver__](@ref option-solver) is ignored and the default solver is used if:
* The problem is an LP and __solver__ is set to "qpasm".
* The problem is a QP and __solver__ is set to "simplex", "ipx", "pdlp" or "hipdlp".
* The problem is a MIP and __solver__ is not set to "choose".