gunnar-wire 1.7.0

git smart-protocol state machines: upload-pack (v2 with a v0 fallback) and receive-pack (v0), transport-agnostic
Documentation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
//! The advertisement must list every argument the parser accepts.
//!
//! Object-format negotiation matters because getting it wrong is invisible: a v2 client
//! will not send `filter` unless `filter` appears in the advertised `fetch`
//! value, so a server that parses more than it advertises has support that
//! never activates, no error, no failing test, no symptom. Stock `git` 2.53
//! advertises exactly `fetch=shallow wait-for-done`, which is what makes the
//! under-advertising shape so easy to copy.
//!
//! `gunnar_wire::caps` fixes it by construction, with one table generating
//! both. This file asserts the resulting property from outside, plus asserts
//! that the assertion itself can fail.

mod common;

use gix_hash::Kind;
use gunnar_wire::caps::{self, Offered, FETCH_ARGUMENTS, LS_REFS_ARGUMENTS};
use gunnar_wire::upload_pack::{FetchRequest, LsRefsRequest, WantPolicy};
use gunnar_wire::UploadPack;

use common::{Fixture, Response};

fn advertisement(kind: Kind) -> Response {
    let fixture = Fixture::build(kind);
    let upload = UploadPack::new(&fixture.git, fixture.kind);
    Response::parse(&upload.capability_advertisement().expect("advertise"))
}

/// Features named by `table` that do not appear in `advertised`.
fn missing_features(advertised: &str, table: &'static [caps::Argument]) -> Vec<&'static str> {
    caps::features(table)
        .into_iter()
        .filter(|feature| !advertised.split(['=', ' ']).any(|word| word == *feature))
        .collect()
}

#[test]
fn every_gated_fetch_argument_appears_in_the_fetch_capability() {
    let advertised = caps::fetch_capability(Offered::default());
    let missing = missing_features(&advertised, FETCH_ARGUMENTS);
    assert!(
        missing.is_empty(),
        "the parser accepts arguments gated on {missing:?}, but the \
         advertisement is {advertised:?}: that support can never activate"
    );
}

#[test]
fn every_gated_ls_refs_argument_appears_in_the_ls_refs_capability() {
    let advertised = caps::ls_refs_capability();
    let missing = missing_features(&advertised, LS_REFS_ARGUMENTS);
    assert!(missing.is_empty(), "ls-refs under-advertises {missing:?}");
}

/// **The red half.** If the check above cannot fail, it proves nothing, so run
/// it against what stock git advertises, which really is not enough for the
/// arguments gunnar parses.
#[test]
fn the_under_advertising_check_can_fail() {
    let stock_git = "fetch=shallow wait-for-done";
    let missing = missing_features(stock_git, FETCH_ARGUMENTS);
    assert!(
        missing.contains(&"filter") && missing.contains(&"ref-in-want"),
        "the check did not notice that {stock_git:?} omits filter and \
         ref-in-want; it would not notice gunnar omitting them either"
    );
}

/// Advertising is one half; the other is that the parser really does take each
/// argument. A feature list generated from a table nothing reads would pass the
/// tests above and still be fiction.
#[test]
fn the_parser_accepts_every_argument_in_its_own_table() {
    for argument in FETCH_ARGUMENTS {
        let line = match argument.value {
            caps::Value::None => argument.name.to_owned(),
            caps::Value::Required => match argument.name {
                "want" | "have" | "shallow" => {
                    format!("{} {}", argument.name, "0".repeat(40))
                }
                "deepen" | "deepen-since" => format!("{} 1", argument.name),
                "deepen-not" => format!("{} refs/heads/main", argument.name),
                "filter" => format!("{} blob:none", argument.name),
                "want-ref" => format!("{} refs/heads/main", argument.name),
                other => panic!("no sample value for the argument {other:?}"),
            },
        };
        let parsed =
            FetchRequest::parse(&[line.clone().into_bytes()], Kind::Sha1, Offered::default());
        assert!(
            parsed.is_ok(),
            "the table names {:?} but the parser refused {line:?}: {:?}",
            argument.name,
            parsed.err()
        );
    }

    for argument in LS_REFS_ARGUMENTS {
        let line = match argument.value {
            caps::Value::None => argument.name.to_owned(),
            caps::Value::Required => format!("{} refs/heads/", argument.name),
        };
        assert!(
            LsRefsRequest::parse(&[line.clone().into_bytes()]).is_ok(),
            "the table names {:?} but the parser refused {line:?}",
            argument.name
        );
    }
}

#[test]
fn an_argument_outside_the_table_is_refused() {
    let err = FetchRequest::parse(
        &[b"deepen-forever".to_vec()],
        Kind::Sha1,
        Offered::default(),
    )
    .expect_err("an unknown argument must not be accepted quietly");
    assert!(
        matches!(err, gunnar_wire::Error::UnknownArgument { .. }),
        "unexpected error: {err}"
    );
}

/// Declining a feature has to remove it from *both* sides at once.
#[test]
fn declining_filter_removes_it_from_the_advertisement_and_the_parser() {
    let offered = Offered { filter: false };
    let advertised = caps::fetch_capability(offered);
    assert!(
        !advertised.contains("filter"),
        "filter was declined but is still advertised: {advertised}"
    );
    assert!(
        FetchRequest::parse(&[b"filter blob:none".to_vec()], Kind::Sha1, offered).is_err(),
        "filter was declined but the parser still accepts it"
    );
    // And it is genuinely a knob, not a constant that is always off.
    assert!(caps::fetch_capability(Offered::default()).contains("filter"));
}

#[test]
fn the_v2_advertisement_has_the_shape_git_expects() {
    let response = advertisement(Kind::Sha1);
    let lines = response.lines();
    assert_eq!(lines.first().map(String::as_str), Some("version 2"));
    assert!(
        lines.iter().any(|line| line.starts_with("agent=gunnar/")),
        "no gunnar agent line: {lines:?}"
    );
    assert!(
        lines.iter().any(|line| line == "server-option"),
        "{lines:?}"
    );
    assert!(
        lines.iter().any(|line| line == "object-format=sha1"),
        "{lines:?}"
    );
    assert!(
        lines.iter().any(|line| line.starts_with("ls-refs=")),
        "{lines:?}"
    );
    assert!(
        response
            .packets
            .last()
            .map(gunnar_pktline::Packet::is_flush)
            == Some(true),
        "the advertisement is not flush-terminated"
    );
}

/// The session-costing object-format bug, pinned on the type that decides it: the
/// advertisement is the repository's hash kind and nothing else.
#[test]
fn object_format_is_echoed_from_the_repositorys_actual_hash_kind() {
    assert!(advertisement(Kind::Sha256).has_line("object-format=sha256"));
    assert!(!advertisement(Kind::Sha256).has_line("object-format=sha1"));
    assert!(advertisement(Kind::Sha1).has_line("object-format=sha1"));
    assert!(!advertisement(Kind::Sha1).has_line("object-format=sha256"));
}

#[test]
fn a_client_naming_the_wrong_object_format_is_refused() {
    let err = caps::check_object_format(Kind::Sha256, Some("sha1"))
        .expect_err("a sha1 client on a sha256 repository must not be waved through");
    assert!(
        matches!(err, gunnar_wire::Error::ObjectFormatMismatch { .. }),
        "unexpected error: {err}"
    );
    caps::check_object_format(Kind::Sha256, Some("sha256")).expect("the matching pair is fine");
    caps::check_object_format(Kind::Sha256, None).expect("saying nothing is fine");
}

/// The v0 advertisement offers every ACK mode gunnar implements, and no other.
///
/// This guard used to say "no `multi_ack*` at all, gunnar is single-ACK", and
/// it was enforcing a design position that stock git disproved: offered no ACK
/// mode, git 2.53.0 falls back to single-ACK, which **cannot complete a
/// multi-round fetch over stateless-rpc** — `fetch-pack: protocol error: bad
/// band #78`, exit 128, against exit 0 from `git http-backend` on the same
/// repository (MEASURED 2026-08-05). See
/// [`caps::upload_pack_v0_capabilities`] for the mechanism.
///
/// So the rule is unchanged and only its application moved: **advertise what is
/// implemented, and nothing else.** `multi_ack_detailed` and `no-done` are
/// implemented, in `UploadPack::serve_v0_session`, and are asserted present.
/// Plain `multi_ack` is a third mode with its own semantics that nothing here
/// implements, and is asserted absent — by an exact match, because the prefix
/// test this once used would be satisfied by `multi_ack_detailed` and could
/// never fail again.
#[test]
fn the_v0_capabilities_promise_exactly_the_negotiation_gunnar_implements() {
    let caps = caps::upload_pack_v0_capabilities(
        Kind::Sha1,
        "gunnar/test",
        Offered::default(),
        WantPolicy::default(),
    );
    assert!(
        !caps.iter().any(|c| c == "multi_ack"),
        "plain `multi_ack` is not implemented; advertising it would be the same \
         class of lie as under-advertising fetch: {caps:?}"
    );
    for expected in [
        // Without these two, a stateless-rpc client negotiates in single-ACK
        // and a multi-round fetch over smart HTTP dies mid-pack.
        "multi_ack_detailed",
        "no-done",
        "side-band-64k",
        "ofs-delta",
        "shallow",
        "include-tag",
        "filter",
        "object-format=sha1",
    ] {
        assert!(
            caps.iter().any(|c| c == expected),
            "v0 capabilities are missing {expected}: {caps:?}"
        );
    }
}

/// The **other** direction of the same rule, and the one v0 got wrong: a
/// capability gunnar implements and does not advertise is refused by the client
/// before the server ever hears the request, so it fails silently on both ends.
///
/// Each policy is checked against the promise it makes, because a `match` that
/// returned the same slice for every arm would satisfy any single-arm test.
#[test]
fn the_v0_capabilities_promise_exactly_the_want_policy_in_force() {
    let of = |policy| {
        caps::upload_pack_v0_capabilities(Kind::Sha1, "gunnar/test", Offered::default(), policy)
    };
    let has = |caps: &[String], name: &str| caps.iter().any(|c| c == name);

    // The default, and git's `uploadpack.allowReachableSHA1InWant`. Without
    // this line a `blob:none` clone over v0 cannot fetch a blob back.
    let reachable = of(WantPolicy::ReachableFromRefs);
    assert!(
        has(&reachable, "allow-reachable-sha1-in-want"),
        "the default policy serves reachable non-tip wants and says nothing: {reachable:?}"
    );
    assert!(!has(&reachable, "allow-tip-sha1-in-want"), "{reachable:?}");

    // Strictest: promises neither, and must not, or a client sends a want that
    // `check_wants` will refuse.
    let tips = of(WantPolicy::AdvertisedTips);
    assert!(!has(&tips, "allow-reachable-sha1-in-want"), "{tips:?}");
    assert!(!has(&tips, "allow-tip-sha1-in-want"), "{tips:?}");

    // `ALLOW_ANY_SHA1` is both bits set in git, so it prints both.
    let any = of(WantPolicy::Any);
    assert!(has(&any, "allow-reachable-sha1-in-want"), "{any:?}");
    assert!(has(&any, "allow-tip-sha1-in-want"), "{any:?}");
}

#[test]
fn receive_pack_advertises_what_receive_pack_implements() {
    let caps = caps::receive_pack_capabilities(Kind::Sha256, "gunnar/test");
    for expected in [
        "report-status",
        "report-status-v2",
        "delete-refs",
        "side-band-64k",
        "quiet",
        "atomic",
        "ofs-delta",
        "push-options",
        "object-format=sha256",
    ] {
        assert!(
            caps.iter().any(|c| c == expected),
            "receive-pack does not advertise {expected}: {caps:?}"
        );
    }
}

#[test]
fn git_protocol_is_parsed_the_way_ssh_delivers_it() {
    use gunnar_wire::ProtocolVersion::*;
    assert_eq!(gunnar_wire::ProtocolVersion::from_git_protocol(None), V0);
    assert_eq!(
        gunnar_wire::ProtocolVersion::from_git_protocol(Some("version=2")),
        V2
    );
    assert_eq!(
        gunnar_wire::ProtocolVersion::from_git_protocol(Some("version=2:other=1")),
        V2
    );
    // v1 is v0 plus one extra line the client tolerates the absence of.
    assert_eq!(
        gunnar_wire::ProtocolVersion::from_git_protocol(Some("version=1")),
        V0
    );
    assert_eq!(
        gunnar_wire::ProtocolVersion::from_git_protocol(Some("nonsense")),
        V0
    );
}

// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Every advertised capability has a consumer — all three surfaces
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
//
// # What was wrong
//
// The module header above says the advertisement is fixed by construction with
// one table generating both halves. That was true of the **v2 arguments** and
// of nothing else. `upload_pack_v0_capabilities` and
// `receive_pack_capabilities` were hand-written `vec![]`s, and the v2
// capability *names* were a fourth hand-written list in `upload_pack.rs`. So
// `"push-options".to_owned()` sat in a `vec![]` that nothing in the tree had to
// agree with — advertised, parsed, and thrown away for the whole of v1, with
// `.len()` in a log line as its only consumer.
//
// An early audit stated that *"advertised but not
// honoured is not something this codebase can express"*. It was expressible in
// three of the four places, and it was expressed.
//
// # What closes it
//
// `caps::ADVERTISED` is now the only thing that decides what goes on the wire,
// for all three surfaces, and every row carries where it is honoured. These
// tests read that claim and check it against the source.

use std::path::{Path, PathBuf};

use gunnar_wire::caps::{CapValue, Capability, Honoured, ADVERTISED};

/// **The compile-time half of a [`Honoured::ByDependency`] citation.**
///
/// A capability discharged by a crate gunnar merely DEPENDS on cannot be checked
/// by reading a file: from a clone, that crate is a registry package under
/// `~/.cargo/registry`, not a path in this tree. It used to be cited as
/// `../edda/crates/gunnar-pack/src/read.rs` and the guard read that path, which
/// meant the guard passed on a machine with an edda checkout beside gunnar and
/// failed everywhere else — for the absence of a sibling, not for anything about
/// gunnar. (Both stopped being true on 2026-09-09: the sibling is a crates.io
/// dependency now, so the path resolved NOWHERE.)
///
/// The `use` below is the check, and it is stronger than the substring search it
/// replaces: if `gunnar_pack::index_thin_pack` is renamed or removed, this file
/// does not COMPILE. The table then only has to agree with it, which
/// `every_advertised_capability_names_code_that_honours_it` asserts in the
/// citation direction — a citation with no witness here is refused.
#[allow(unused_imports)]
use gunnar_pack::index_thin_pack as _witness_ofs_delta_is_resolved_by_gunnar_pack;

/// Every `(crate, item)` pair that has a `use` above. One line per citation.
const DEPENDENCY_WITNESSES: &[(&str, &str)] = &[("gunnar-pack", "index_thin_pack")];

fn workspace_root() -> PathBuf {
    // `crates/gunnar-wire` → `crates` → root.
    Path::new(env!("CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR"))
        .ancestors()
        .nth(2)
        .expect("gunnar-wire lives two levels under the workspace root")
        .to_path_buf()
}

/// `text` with every `//` comment removed, line comments and doc comments
/// alike, leaving string literals intact.
///
/// # Why this exists
///
/// `contains("push-options")` is satisfied by the paragraph *explaining*
/// push-options two lines above the call site. That exact shape — a
/// `contains(…)` a doc comment could satisfy — was found in this tree on
/// 2026-08-05 in a guard written to catch guards like it. So the source a
/// consumer claim is checked against is the code, and only the code.
///
/// Block comments are not stripped: nothing in this workspace uses them, and a
/// stripper that handled a construct nobody writes would be untested code
/// standing between a guard and its subject.
fn code_only(text: &str) -> String {
    let mut out = String::with_capacity(text.len());
    for line in text.lines() {
        let bytes = line.as_bytes();
        let mut in_string = false;
        let mut escaped = false;
        let mut end = bytes.len();
        let mut i = 0;
        while i < bytes.len() {
            let c = bytes[i];
            if escaped {
                escaped = false;
            } else if c == b'\\' && in_string {
                escaped = true;
            } else if c == b'"' {
                in_string = !in_string;
            } else if c == b'/' && !in_string && i + 1 < bytes.len() && bytes[i + 1] == b'/' {
                end = i;
                break;
            }
            i += 1;
        }
        out.push_str(&line[..end]);
        out.push('\n');
    }
    out
}

/// Every capability on every surface, with the surface's name.
fn every_capability() -> Vec<(&'static str, &'static Capability)> {
    ADVERTISED
        .iter()
        .flat_map(|(surface, table)| table.iter().map(move |cap| (*surface, cap)))
        .collect()
}

#[test]
fn every_advertised_capability_names_code_that_honours_it() {
    let root = workspace_root();
    let all = every_capability();

    // Not vacuous: three surfaces really are being walked, and each has rows.
    assert_eq!(
        ADVERTISED.len(),
        3,
        "a surface was added or lost: {ADVERTISED:?}"
    );
    assert!(
        all.len() >= 25,
        "only {} capabilities across all three surfaces, which is fewer than gunnar \
         advertises; this test is looking at the wrong thing",
        all.len()
    );

    let mut checked = 0usize;
    let mut vacuous: Vec<&str> = Vec::new();
    for (surface, cap) in &all {
        match cap.honoured {
            Honoured::ByDependency { krate, item } => {
                // The claim is that a named ITEM exists in a named CRATE, and the
                // COMPILER has already asserted it: `DEPENDENCY_WITNESSES` below
                // carries a `use` of every one, so this file does not build if the
                // item goes. What is left to check here is that the table and the
                // witness list agree — a citation with no witness is a claim
                // nothing verified, and it is the shape this arm was created to
                // stop (`../edda/crates/gunnar-pack/src/read.rs`, a path that
                // resolved only on a machine with a sibling checkout).
                assert!(
                    DEPENDENCY_WITNESSES.contains(&(krate, item)),
                    "{surface} advertises `{}` and says {krate}::{item} honours it, and \
                     nothing in DEPENDENCY_WITNESSES names that pair. Add a `use` for it \
                     there, so the compiler is what checks the citation.",
                    cap.name
                );
                checked += 1;
            }
            Honoured::By { file, code } => {
                let path = root.join(file);
                let text = std::fs::read_to_string(&path).unwrap_or_else(|err| {
                    panic!(
                        "{surface} advertises `{}` and says it is honoured in {file}, which \
                         cannot be read: {err}",
                        cap.name
                    )
                });
                assert!(
                    code_only(&text).contains(code),
                    "{surface} advertises `{}` and claims {file} honours it with `{code}`, \
                     but no LINE OF CODE there contains that (comments are stripped before \
                     looking, so a doc comment mentioning it does not count). Either the \
                     consumer was deleted — in which case the capability must come out of \
                     the table, because advertising it is a wrong answer on the wire — or \
                     the code moved and the table must follow it.",
                    cap.name
                );
                checked += 1;
            }
            Honoured::Vacuously(reason) => {
                assert!(
                    reason.len() > 80,
                    "{surface}'s `{}` is marked vacuously honoured with a {}-character \
                     reason. This variant is the escape hatch from the check above; it has \
                     to carry the argument, not a label.",
                    cap.name,
                    reason.len()
                );
                vacuous.push(cap.name);
            }
        }
    }

    // The escape hatch must not grow quietly. Three today: `agent` (twice over,
    // once per surface — it is one constant) and `quiet` and `server-option`.
    assert!(
        checked >= 20,
        "only {checked} capabilities were checked against real code; the rest took the \
         vacuous exit: {vacuous:?}"
    );
    vacuous.sort_unstable();
    vacuous.dedup();
    assert_eq!(
        vacuous,
        vec!["agent", "quiet", "server-option"],
        "the set of capabilities that honour themselves by doing nothing changed. Each one \
         is a capability gunnar promises on the wire and has no code for; adding to this \
         list is a decision, not a refactor."
    );
}

/// **The red half.** The check above must be able to fail, and must not be
/// satisfiable by a comment.
#[test]
fn the_consumer_check_can_fail_and_a_comment_does_not_satisfy_it() {
    // ── a doc comment is not a consumer ────────────────────────────────────
    let prose = "/// `push-options` is read here and handed to the gate.\n\
                 let x = 1;\n";
    assert!(
        prose.contains(r#"push-options"#),
        "the naive check would pass on this"
    );
    assert!(
        !code_only(prose).contains("push-options"),
        "a doc comment satisfied the consumer check, which is exactly the defect this \
         stripper exists for"
    );

    // ── a trailing comment does not, either ────────────────────────────────
    let trailing = "let sideband = false; // peer.has(\"side-band-64k\")\n";
    assert!(!code_only(trailing).contains(r#"peer.has("side-band-64k")"#));

    // ── but real code does, on the same line as a comment ──────────────────
    let real = "let atomic = peer.has(\"atomic\"); // the batch flag\n";
    assert!(code_only(real).contains(r#"peer.has("atomic")"#));

    // ── a `//` inside a string literal is not a comment ────────────────────
    let url = "let u = \"ssh://git@host\"; let a = peer.has(\"atomic\");\n";
    assert!(
        code_only(url).contains(r#"peer.has("atomic")"#),
        "the stripper cut the line at a `//` inside a string literal and lost real code"
    );

    // ── and the real check really would notice a missing consumer ──────────
    let root = workspace_root();
    let bogus = Capability {
        name: "not-a-real-capability",
        value: CapValue::Bare,
        offered: None,
        honoured: Honoured::By {
            file: "crates/gunnar-wire/src/receive_pack.rs",
            code: r#"peer.has("not-a-real-capability")"#,
        },
        requires: None,
    };
    let Honoured::By { file, code } = bogus.honoured else {
        unreachable!()
    };
    let text = std::fs::read_to_string(root.join(file)).expect("read receive_pack.rs");
    assert!(
        !code_only(&text).contains(code),
        "the check would pass on a capability nothing reads, so it checks nothing"
    );
    // …and it passes on one that IS read, in the same file, so the negative
    // above is not just a file that never matches anything.
    assert!(code_only(&text).contains(r#"peer.has("push-options")"#));
}

/// The bytes on the wire are the table, on every surface.
///
/// Generating from a table proves nothing if a literal is written beside it.
/// Both hand-written `vec![]`s and the fourth list in `upload_pack.rs` are gone,
/// and this is what says so: the advertisement gunnar actually emits carries
/// exactly the table's names, no more and no fewer.
#[test]
fn the_wire_advertisement_carries_exactly_the_table() {
    fn names(lines: &[String]) -> Vec<String> {
        let mut n: Vec<String> = lines
            .iter()
            .map(|l| l.split_once('=').map_or(l.as_str(), |(k, _)| k).to_owned())
            .collect();
        n.sort();
        n
    }
    fn table_names(table: &'static [Capability]) -> Vec<String> {
        let mut n: Vec<String> = table.iter().map(|c| c.name.to_owned()).collect();
        n.sort();
        n
    }

    // `WantPolicy::Any` renders every row, so "no more and no fewer" is
    // asserted against the WHOLE table rather than against a filtered view of
    // it — a filtered comparison would agree with itself if the filter were
    // the bug. That the policy column really withdraws rows is
    // `the_v0_capabilities_promise_exactly_the_want_policy_in_force`.
    let everything = WantPolicy::Any;
    for kind in [Kind::Sha1, Kind::Sha256] {
        assert_eq!(
            names(&caps::receive_pack_capabilities(kind, "gunnar/test")),
            table_names(caps::RECEIVE_PACK)
        );
        assert_eq!(
            names(&caps::upload_pack_v0_capabilities(
                kind,
                "gunnar/test",
                Offered::default(),
                everything,
            )),
            table_names(caps::UPLOAD_PACK_V0)
        );

        // v2 is read back off the WIRE, through the real `UploadPack`, because
        // that is the surface whose list lived in another file.
        let fixture = Fixture::build(kind);
        let upload = UploadPack::new(&fixture.git, fixture.kind);
        let bytes = upload.capability_advertisement().expect("advertise");
        let response = Response::parse(&bytes);
        let on_wire: Vec<String> = response
            .lines()
            .into_iter()
            .map(|l| l.trim().to_owned())
            .filter(|l| l != "version 2" && !l.is_empty())
            .collect();
        let on_wire = names(&on_wire);
        assert_eq!(
            on_wire,
            table_names(caps::UPLOAD_PACK_V2),
            "the v2 advertisement on the wire is not the table"
        );
    }

    // Withdrawing `filter` really removes it from the v0 wire list, so the
    // `Offered` column is not decoration.
    let without = caps::upload_pack_v0_capabilities(
        Kind::Sha1,
        "gunnar/test",
        Offered { filter: false },
        WantPolicy::default(),
    );
    assert!(!without.iter().any(|c| c == "filter"));
    assert!(caps::upload_pack_v0_capabilities(
        Kind::Sha1,
        "gunnar/test",
        Offered::default(),
        WantPolicy::default()
    )
    .iter()
    .any(|c| c == "filter"));
}

// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// The other direction: honoured, but named by nothing
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
//
// # The class, stated once
//
// `every_advertised_capability_names_code_that_honours_it` walks the table and
// asks whether each row has a consumer. That catches **a row nothing reads**.
// It cannot catch the inverse — *a behaviour the server enforces that no row
// declares* — because there is no row to walk. Nothing to look at, nothing to
// go stale, nothing to fail.
//
// That inverse has produced four wrong answers in this tree in one day:
//
// | | what was enforced | what said so |
// |---|---|---|
// | v0 incremental fetch | `thin-pack` was advertised and only the v2 parser read it | nothing |
// | v0 capability rows | three rows cited the v2 parser, so the guard watched code that could not be wrong | nothing |
// | v0 lazy fetch | `WantPolicy::ReachableFromRefs` on every request | nothing — fixed in `8f4e6e0` |
// | `--shallow-exclude=side` | the exclusion was silently discarded | nothing |
//
// The v0 lazy fetch is the sharpest of them: **not a row nothing reads, but a
// policy no row names.** A stock client refused on its own side, gunnar never
// heard the request, and no log line existed anywhere to notice.
//
// So the two guards below walk the *code* and ask the table about it, rather
// than the other way round.

/// Every `peer.has("…")` / `peer.value("…")` in `text`, in source order.
///
/// The server's capability **readers**. A name here that is not in the
/// corresponding table is a capability gunnar acts on and never offers, which
/// is the inverse drift: a client cannot know to send it, so the branch is
/// dead, and if a non-git client ever did send it the server would honour a
/// promise it never made.
fn capability_reads(text: &str) -> Vec<String> {
    let mut out = Vec::new();
    for opener in [r#"peer.has(""#, r#"peer.value(""#] {
        let mut rest = text;
        while let Some(at) = rest.find(opener) {
            rest = &rest[at + opener.len()..];
            if let Some(end) = rest.find('"') {
                out.push(rest[..end].to_owned());
            }
        }
    }
    out.sort();
    out.dedup();
    out
}

/// **Every capability the server READS is one the server ADVERTISES.**
///
/// Seen red: this test was written against the tree at `c74053c` and failed
/// naming `side-band` — `upload_pack.rs` read `peer.has("side-band-64k") ||
/// peer.has("side-band")` while `UPLOAD_PACK_V0` offered only the 64k form.
/// Nothing in the tree ever sent the plain one, so the branch was dead; had a
/// non-git client sent it, gunnar would have opened a sideband and framed it in
/// 65515-byte packets at a peer that asked for 1000-byte ones. A capability
/// gunnar cannot keep is not a capability gunnar may read.
#[test]
fn every_capability_the_server_reads_is_one_it_advertises() {
    let root = workspace_root();
    let surfaces: [(&str, &str, &[Capability]); 2] = [
        (
            "upload-pack v0",
            "crates/gunnar-wire/src/upload_pack.rs",
            caps::UPLOAD_PACK_V0,
        ),
        (
            "receive-pack",
            "crates/gunnar-wire/src/receive_pack.rs",
            caps::RECEIVE_PACK,
        ),
    ];

    for (surface, file, table) in surfaces {
        let text = std::fs::read_to_string(root.join(file)).expect("read the surface's source");
        let reads = capability_reads(&code_only(&text));
        // Not vacuous: a scanner that found nothing would pass this loop
        // silently, which is the shape of a guard that can never be red.
        assert!(
            reads.len() >= 4,
            "{surface}: only {} capability reads were found in {file} ({reads:?}). The scanner \
             is looking at the wrong thing, and an empty list satisfies every assertion below",
            reads.len()
        );
        for name in &reads {
            assert!(
                table.iter().any(|cap| cap.name == name),
                "{surface} READS the capability `{name}` in {file}, and does not ADVERTISE it. \
                 A client is never told it may send `{name}`, so the branch is dead code at \
                 best; at worst gunnar honours a promise it never made, to a peer that guessed. \
                 Either add the row — with a `Honoured` and, if it depends on a policy, a \
                 `requires` — or stop reading it."
            );
        }
    }
}

/// **The red half.** The scanner must find real names and reject a fabricated
/// one, or the loop above is a walk over an empty list.
#[test]
fn the_capability_read_scanner_can_fail_and_ignores_comments() {
    // It finds what is really there.
    let root = workspace_root();
    let upload = std::fs::read_to_string(root.join("crates/gunnar-wire/src/upload_pack.rs"))
        .expect("read upload_pack.rs");
    let reads = capability_reads(&code_only(&upload));
    for expected in ["ofs-delta", "thin-pack", "side-band-64k", "object-format"] {
        assert!(
            reads.contains(&expected.to_string()),
            "the scanner missed `{expected}`, which upload-pack demonstrably reads: {reads:?}"
        );
    }

    // A name only a comment mentions is not a read, so the guard cannot be
    // satisfied — or tripped — by prose.
    let prose = "// peer.has(\"invented-capability\")\nlet x = 1;\n";
    assert!(
        capability_reads(&code_only(prose)).is_empty(),
        "a commented-out read counted as a read"
    );

    // …and a real one on the same line as a comment IS found, so the stripper
    // is not simply eating everything.
    let real = "let q = peer.has(\"invented-capability\"); // why\n";
    assert_eq!(
        capability_reads(&code_only(real)),
        vec!["invented-capability".to_string()],
        "the scanner cannot see a read at all"
    );

    // And the assertion the loop makes really would reject it.
    assert!(
        !caps::UPLOAD_PACK_V0
            .iter()
            .any(|cap| cap.name == "invented-capability"),
        "the table would accept a capability nothing advertises, so the loop checks nothing"
    );
}

/// The `pub <name>:` fields of the struct that `declaration` opens, read out of
/// `text`.
///
/// Deliberately naive and deliberately anchored: it takes the lines from the
/// declaration to the first `}` at column zero. Nothing in this workspace nests
/// a braced item inside a struct body, and a parser that handled a construct
/// nobody writes would be untested code standing between a guard and its
/// subject — the same argument `code_only` makes about block comments.
fn struct_fields(text: &str, declaration: &str) -> Vec<String> {
    let body = text
        .split_once(declaration)
        .unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("no {declaration:?} in this file"))
        .1;
    let body = body.split_once("\n}").map_or(body, |(head, _)| head);
    let mut out: Vec<String> = Vec::new();
    for line in code_only(body).lines() {
        let line = line.trim();
        let Some(rest) = line.strip_prefix("pub ") else {
            continue;
        };
        let Some((name, _)) = rest.split_once(':') else {
            continue;
        };
        let name = name.trim();
        if !name.is_empty() && name.chars().all(|c| c.is_ascii_lowercase() || c == '_') {
            out.push(name.to_owned());
        }
    }
    out.sort();
    out.dedup();
    out
}

/// Judge one [`caps::Policy`]'s verdict, or say what is wrong with it.
///
/// A function rather than three arms inlined in the loop below, because the
/// loop cannot reach every arm: no field of any `Config` is
/// [`caps::Declared::Invisible`] today, so that arm would be a branch of a
/// guard that has never once executed — a blind third of the check, in a test
/// written to find blind checks. `the_policy_census_can_fail` calls this
/// directly with a fabricated `Policy` and exercises all three.
fn check_verdict(
    root: &Path,
    surface: &str,
    policy: &caps::Policy,
) -> std::result::Result<(), String> {
    let field = policy.field;
    match policy.declared {
        caps::Declared::As(name) => {
            if !ADVERTISED
                .iter()
                .any(|(_, table)| table.iter().any(|cap| cap.name == name))
            {
                return Err(format!(
                    "{surface}'s `{field}` claims a client learns it from the capability \
                     `{name}`, and no surface advertises that. The claim is the whole value of \
                     the entry."
                ));
            }
        }
        caps::Declared::Refuses { seen_by, reason } => {
            if seen_by.is_empty() {
                return Err(format!(
                    "{surface}'s `{field}` says it refuses and names no test that saw the refusal"
                ));
            }
            for citation in seen_by {
                // Rejoined because the constants are written across two source
                // lines and carry the continuation's indentation.
                let citation: String = citation.split_whitespace().collect::<Vec<_>>().join("");
                let Some((file, test)) = citation.split_once("::") else {
                    return Err(format!("{citation:?} is not <file>::<test fn>"));
                };
                let text = std::fs::read_to_string(root.join(file)).map_err(|err| {
                    format!("{surface}'s `{field}` cites {file}, which cannot be read: {err}")
                })?;
                if !code_only(&text).contains(&format!("fn {test}(")) {
                    return Err(format!(
                        "{surface}'s `{field}` says the peer sees the refusal and cites \
                         {file}::{test}, which is not a test there. A citation that does not \
                         resolve is the claim without the evidence."
                    ));
                }
            }
            if reason.len() <= 120 {
                return Err(format!(
                    "{surface}'s `{field}` explains its refusal in {} characters; this arm is a \
                     claim about what a peer sees and has to carry it",
                    reason.len()
                ));
            }
        }
        caps::Declared::RefusesUncovered(reason) => {
            // An ADMISSION, so what it must carry is different from what `Refuses`
            // carries: no citation (there is nothing to cite — that IS the arm), a
            // longer argument than the escape hatch, and the way out named. An
            // admission that does not say how it stops being one becomes furniture.
            if reason.len() <= 200 {
                return Err(format!(
                    "{surface}'s `{field}` admits the refusal is uncovered in {} characters. \
                     This arm has to say what the peer sees AND what would cover it.",
                    reason.len()
                ));
            }
            let joined: String = reason.split_whitespace().collect::<Vec<_>>().join(" ");
            if !joined.contains("THE WAY OUT") {
                return Err(format!(
                    "{surface}'s `{field}` admits it is uncovered and does not name THE WAY \
                     OUT. An admission with no route back is how a gap becomes permanent."
                ));
            }
        }
        caps::Declared::Invisible(reason) => {
            if reason.len() <= 80 {
                return Err(format!(
                    "{surface}'s `{field}` is marked invisible with a {}-character reason; that \
                     is the escape hatch and it has to cost the argument",
                    reason.len()
                ));
            }
        }
    }
    Ok(())
}

/// **Every serving-side policy is declared somewhere — on the wire, or in a
/// refusal a test has watched arrive.**
///
/// This is the guard for the class, rather than for one member of it. The
/// question it makes unanswerable-by-omission is *"gunnar enforces this; how
/// does a client find out?"*, and the three legal answers are the arms of
/// [`caps::Declared`].
///
/// It works by reading the `Config` structs **out of the source** rather than
/// from a list beside them, so a new knob fails this test the moment it is
/// added — which is the only version of this guard that stays true. A
/// hand-written second list of field names is the exact shape (`push-options`
/// in a `vec![]`) that put four wrong answers on the wire.
///
/// Seen red four ways ; 2026-08-05, each naming its own subject:
///
/// * `pub stray_knob: bool` added to `upload_pack::Config` → *"upload-pack
///   enforces `stray_knob` … and nothing in `SERVER_POLICIES` says how a client
///   finds out"*;
/// * an entry left in `SERVER_POLICIES` after its field went → *"`SERVER_POLICIES`
///   classifies `a_removed_knob` for what is on offer, which is not a field of
///   `pub struct Offered {`"*;
/// * `Declared::As("allow-reachable-sha1-in-wants")`, one letter wrong →
///   *"claims a client learns it from the capability
///   `allow-reachable-sha1-in-wants`, and no surface advertises that"*;
/// * a `Declared::Refuses` citation with a typo in the test name → *"cites
///   …`::a_traversal_budget_of_one_refuses_a_clone_rather_than_truncating_itx`,
///   which is not a test there"*.
#[test]
fn every_serving_policy_is_declared_somewhere() {
    let root = workspace_root();

    // Not vacuous: three surfaces, and each really has fields.
    assert_eq!(
        caps::SERVER_POLICIES.len(),
        3,
        "a policy surface was added or lost: {:?}",
        caps::SERVER_POLICIES
    );

    let mut classified = 0usize;
    for surface in caps::SERVER_POLICIES {
        let text = std::fs::read_to_string(root.join(surface.file))
            .unwrap_or_else(|err| panic!("{} cannot be read: {err}", surface.file));
        let in_source = struct_fields(&text, surface.declaration);
        assert!(
            !in_source.is_empty(),
            "{}: `{}` in {} parsed to no fields at all, so every assertion below is about an \
             empty set",
            surface.surface,
            surface.declaration,
            surface.file
        );

        let mut listed: Vec<String> = surface.fields.iter().map(|p| p.field.to_owned()).collect();
        listed.sort();

        for field in &in_source {
            assert!(
                listed.contains(field),
                "{} enforces `{field}` (a field of `{}` in {}) and nothing in \
                 `SERVER_POLICIES` says how a client finds out. That is the shape of the \
                 `WantPolicy` defect: a policy the server applies to every request and no \
                 capability names, so a stock client refuses on its OWN side and the server \
                 never hears the request. Classify it — `Declared::As` if a peer must know \
                 before it asks, `Declared::Refuses` with a test that watched the refusal \
                 arrive, or `Declared::Invisible` with the argument.",
                surface.surface,
                surface.declaration,
                surface.file
            );
        }
        for field in &listed {
            assert!(
                in_source.contains(field),
                "`SERVER_POLICIES` classifies `{field}` for {}, which is not a field of `{}` \
                 in {} ({in_source:?}). A verdict on a knob that no longer exists reads as \
                 coverage and is not.",
                surface.surface,
                surface.declaration,
                surface.file
            );
        }

        for policy in surface.fields {
            if let Err(complaint) = check_verdict(&root, surface.surface, policy) {
                panic!("{complaint}");
            }
            classified += 1;
        }
    }

    assert!(
        classified >= 8,
        "only {classified} policy fields were classified across all surfaces, which is fewer \
         than gunnar has; this test is looking at the wrong structs"
    );
}

/// **The red half.** The field reader has to see real fields and has to notice
/// one that is missing, or the test above is a loop over nothing.
#[test]
fn the_policy_census_can_fail() {
    let root = workspace_root();
    let upload = std::fs::read_to_string(root.join("crates/gunnar-wire/src/upload_pack.rs"))
        .expect("read upload_pack.rs");

    // It reads the real struct.
    let fields = struct_fields(&upload, "pub struct Config {");
    for expected in ["agent", "budget", "limits", "offered", "want_policy"] {
        assert!(
            fields.contains(&expected.to_string()),
            "the field reader missed `{expected}`, which upload-pack's Config demonstrably \
             has: {fields:?}"
        );
    }
    // …and stops at the struct, rather than running on into the file. `Config`
    // is followed by `impl Default` and then by `WantPolicy`, so a reader that
    // did not stop would sweep up half the module.
    assert!(
        !fields.contains(&"wants".to_string()) && fields.len() < 10,
        "the field reader ran past the end of the struct: {fields:?}"
    );

    // A field the census does not classify is genuinely caught.
    let invented = "pub struct Fake {\n    /// doc\n    pub stray_knob: bool,\n}\n";
    assert_eq!(
        struct_fields(invented, "pub struct Fake {"),
        vec!["stray_knob".to_string()],
        "the reader cannot see a new field, so it can never report one"
    );
    assert!(
        !caps::SERVER_POLICIES
            .iter()
            .flat_map(|s| s.fields)
            .any(|p| p.field == "stray_knob"),
        "the census would accept an unclassified field, so it checks nothing"
    );

    // A doc comment naming a field is not a field.
    let commented = "pub struct Fake {\n    // pub ghost_knob: bool,\n    pub real: bool,\n}\n";
    assert_eq!(
        struct_fields(commented, "pub struct Fake {"),
        vec!["real".to_string()],
        "a commented-out field counted as policy"
    );

    // ── all three verdict arms, including the one no real field uses ───────
    //
    // `Declared::Invisible` is not on any `Config` field today, so the census
    // loop never enters that arm. A branch of a guard that has never executed
    // is a guard that has never been tested, so it is exercised here instead of
    // being taken on trust.
    let judge = |declared| {
        check_verdict(
            &root,
            "a fixture",
            &caps::Policy {
                field: "f",
                declared,
            },
        )
    };

    assert!(
        judge(caps::Declared::Invisible("too short to be an argument")).is_err(),
        "a one-line `Invisible` reason was accepted; the escape hatch costs nothing"
    );
    assert!(
        judge(caps::Declared::Invisible(
            "this is a reason long enough to be an argument rather than a label, which is the \
             entire bar the variant sets, and it is set at eighty characters"
        ))
        .is_ok(),
        "a real argument was rejected, so the `Invisible` arm refuses everything and says \
         nothing about length"
    );
    assert!(
        judge(caps::Declared::As("not-a-capability-anyone-advertises")).is_err(),
        "the `As` arm accepted a capability no table carries"
    );
    assert!(
        judge(caps::Declared::As("filter")).is_ok(),
        "the `As` arm rejected a capability gunnar demonstrably advertises, so its failure above \
         was not about the name"
    );
    assert!(
        judge(caps::Declared::Refuses {
            seen_by: &[],
            reason: "x"
        })
        .is_err(),
        "the `Refuses` arm accepted a claim with no test behind it"
    );
}

/// **The v0 WIRE carries exactly the table, plus the one documented exception.**
///
/// `the_wire_advertisement_carries_exactly_the_table` reads the v2
/// advertisement off the wire and the v0 one out of
/// `caps::upload_pack_v0_capabilities`. That asymmetry is the hole: the v0
/// capability string is assembled in `write_ref_advertisement`, which takes the
/// table's list and then **appends to it** —
///
/// ```text
/// extra.push(format!("symref=HEAD:{symref}"));
/// ```
///
/// — so `symref` has always ridden on the v0 wire while being in no table, seen
/// by no `Honoured`, and counted by no guard. It is not a wrong answer: git's
/// client reads it, gunnar computes it from the repository's real `HEAD`, and
/// `the_v0_advertisement_names_heads_branch` covers the value. It is an
/// *unwatched* one, and the next literal appended beside it would be too.
///
/// So this reads the actual first ref line and holds the whole capability set
/// to the table with `symref` named as the single exception. A second
/// off-table literal fails here.
///
/// Seen red both ways ; 2026-08-05: with `extra.push("no-done")` added to
/// `write_ref_advertisement`, this reports *"the v0 wire carries `no-done`,
/// which no row of `UPLOAD_PACK_V0` names"*; with the `symref` exception
/// misspelt so it stops matching, it reports the same sentence about `symref` —
/// which is what says the exception is load bearing rather than decorative.
#[test]
fn the_v0_wire_carries_exactly_the_table_plus_symref() {
    use gunnar_wire::upload_pack::Config;

    for kind in [Kind::Sha1, Kind::Sha256] {
        let fixture = Fixture::build(kind);
        // `WantPolicy::Any` for the same reason the v2 arm uses it: every
        // policy-gated row renders, so "no more and no fewer" is asserted
        // against the whole table rather than against a filtered view that
        // would agree with itself if the filter were the bug.
        let upload = UploadPack::new(&fixture.git, fixture.kind).with_config(Config {
            want_policy: WantPolicy::Any,
            ..Config::default()
        });
        let mut bytes = Vec::new();
        upload
            .write_ref_advertisement(&mut bytes)
            .expect("the v0 advertisement");
        let text = String::from_utf8_lossy(&bytes).into_owned();

        // The capability string is everything after the first NUL, up to the
        // end of that pkt-line.
        let nul = text.find('\0').unwrap_or_else(|| {
            panic!(
                "the v0 advertisement has no NUL, so it carries no capabilities at all: {text:?}"
            )
        });
        let rest = &text[nul + 1..];
        let line = &rest[..rest.find('\n').unwrap_or(rest.len())];
        let on_wire: Vec<&str> = line.split(' ').filter(|c| !c.is_empty()).collect();
        assert!(
            on_wire.len() >= 10,
            "only {} capabilities on the v0 wire ({on_wire:?}); this test is reading the wrong \
             bytes and every assertion below is about a short list",
            on_wire.len()
        );

        for entry in &on_wire {
            let name = entry.split_once('=').map_or(*entry, |(k, _)| k);
            // `symref` is the one capability whose value is a fact about the
            // repository rather than about the server, so it cannot be a
            // static row. It is named here, once, deliberately.
            if name == "symref" {
                continue;
            }
            assert!(
                caps::UPLOAD_PACK_V0.iter().any(|cap| cap.name == name),
                "the v0 wire carries `{name}`, which no row of `UPLOAD_PACK_V0` names. A \
                 capability appended beside the table is a promise with no `Honoured`, no \
                 `requires` and no guard — which is how `push-options` was advertised, parsed \
                 and discarded for a whole release. Wire: {on_wire:?}"
            );
        }
        // …and nothing the table promises went missing on the way out.
        for cap in caps::UPLOAD_PACK_V0 {
            assert!(
                on_wire
                    .iter()
                    .any(|entry| entry.split_once('=').map_or(*entry, |(k, _)| k) == cap.name),
                "`{}` is in `UPLOAD_PACK_V0` and is not on the v0 wire: {on_wire:?}",
                cap.name
            );
        }
        // The exception is real and not a spelling nobody emits.
        assert!(
            on_wire.iter().any(|c| c.starts_with("symref=HEAD:")),
            "the `symref` exception above is excusing something that is not there: {on_wire:?}"
        );
    }
}